Philippine History
Meaning of History
Sources of History
Historical Criticism
Colonial Historiography
Philippine Historiography After World War II
Characteristics of Contemporary Philippine
Historiography
“In order to know the destiny of
the people, it is necessary to open
the book of its past.”
- Jose Rizal (The Philippines A Century Hence)
study of past events presented in chronological
order and with explanation
artifacts
c. Oral and Video Accounts
Primary Sources ( materials produced by people
or groups directly involved in the event;
participants/eyewitnesses to the event)
Secondary Sources (testimony of anyone who is
not an eyewitness; books, articles, and scholarly
journals)
Historians attempt to understand the past
Historians attempt to understand the past based
on evidence
Historical evidence that comes directly from
society is called primary source.
Historians interpret the primary source to
decide what they actually tell us about the past
Interpretation: The process of deciding on
the meaning of a historical source
Based on these interpretations, historians
attempt to create a narrative (a story)about
what happened in the past
Historical narratives and interpretations are
known as secondary sources.
In order for a source to be used as evidence
in history, basic matters about its form and
content must be settled
1. External Criticism
2. Internal Criticism
The problem of authenticity
To spot fabricated, forged, faked
documents
To distinguish a hoax or misrepresentation
1.Determine the date of the document to see
whether they are anachronistic
e.g. pencils did not exist before the 16th
Century
2.Determine the author
e.g. handwriting, signature, seal
3. Anachronistic style
e.g. idiom, ortography, punctuation
4. Anachronistic reference to events
e.g. too early, too late, too remote
5.Provenance or custody
e.g. determines its genuineness
6. Semantics – determining the meaning of a text or word
7.Hermeneutics –determining ambiguities
The Problem of Credibility
Relevant particulars in the document – is it
credible?
Verisimilar – as close as what really happened
from a critical examination of best available
sources
1.Identification of the author
e.g. to determine his reliability; mental processes, personal attitudes
2.Determination of the approximate date
e.g. handwriting, signature, seal
3. Ability to tell the truth
e.g. nearness to the event, competence of witness, degree of attention
4. Willingness to tell the truth
e.g. to determine if the author consciously or unconsciously tells falsehoods
5. Corroboration
i.e. historical facts – particulars which rest upon the independent testimony of
two or more reliable witnesses
Historians
Secondary
Historiography Sources
Lesson
Navigator
period of darkness or backwardness
period of advancement or enlightenment
Teodoro Agoncillo
pioneered nationalist historiography
in the country by highlighting the role
of the Filipino reformists and
revolutionaries from 1872
“lost history”
PHILIPPINE HISTORIOGRAPHY AFTER WORLD WAR II
Renato Constantino
“people’s history”
PHILIPPINE HISTORIOGRAPHY AFTER WORLD WAR II
Zeus Salazar
“Pantayong Pananaw”
PHILIPPINE HISTORIOGRAPHY AFTER WORLD WAR II
Reynaldo Ileto
Samuel Tan
Colonial Histories
Emphasis on Lowland Christianized Filipinos
Political Narratives
Patriarchal Orientation
Elite-centric Perspectives
3. You have been assigned to write a brief history about your family,
organization, school, or village. The objective of the project is to
examine the available primary documents such as letters, minutes
of the meeting, pictures, and other memorabilia that you can use
in making a historical account. It is important to identify and
explain the turning points or highlights of your historical narrative.
Your paper will be graded based on extensiveness of the primary
documents to be utilized and organization of the historical
account.