RL.4.1: Refer to details and examples in a text when explaining what the text says explicitly and
when drawing inferences from the text.
A. Use context (dialogue and narration in text) as clues to determining theme
B. Use graphic organizer to map, organize, and cite examples
C. Describe how stage directions and dialogue give clues about characters and theme
D. Find evidence in the text
RL.4.2: Determine a theme of a story, drama, or poem from details in the text; summarize the text
A. Use close reading skills to identify clues to the theme
B. Examine words and actions of Ant and Grasshopper and their significance
C. Understand story by summarizing key plot points
D. Identify and classify important details
Student Learning Goal: STATE YOUR GOAL FOR THE STUDENTS TO SHARE
Students will be able to identify the theme of “The Ant and the Grasshopper” by using close reading
to support their claims with textual evidence.
Students will demonstrate appropriate social skills, speaking skills, reading skills, and listening skills
by working in groups to come to a common understanding of the material. Students will practice
their public speaking skills in front of the class.
English Language Learner may have problems with vocabulary, reading aloud, and citing textual
evidence when determining theme. Students will work in heterogeneous groups to facilitate reading
comprehension and writing fluency. I will also use an ELL Scaffold to have my ELL students
respond orally, identify, and discuss key ideas and clues in Scene 1. Students with IEP will be
instructed in accordance to their education plan. One student is on a behavioral contract due to his
inability to behave and remain on task.
Some misconceptions may arise when students are differentiating between summary and theme. I
will challenge these students’ misconceptions by them work in pairs. In this way, students will
correct each other if one misinterprets the text or misinterprets theme vs summary. Misconceptions
will further be challenged when groups share their answers to their theme summary. By doing so,
students are able to hear other groups’ ideas of the theme and the textual evidence to support such
ideas.
Part 2: My Class
My Classroom Composite: (TEACHER, LEARNER) Whole group (broad needs of students;
observable patterns and trends; language and literacy subgroups; digital/technology fluency;
emotional regulation)
Students are performing at various levels of language proficiency and reading ability. Despite their
differing levels, these students love to collaborate and assist one another. Though there are language
barriers, there are students who work with others to translate and facilitate classwork. There are some
friend groups that remain constant and some bullying that occurs, especially regarding Steven, but I
have taken steps to remedy the situation and many of the students are responsive and growing more
inclusive. Because bullying does occur, I sometimes group Steven with specific students who are
positive influences to his education. Working in groups and pairs has increased class inclusivity and I
have seen less bullying as a result. Some students in the class are advanced while others are below
level. This is why I have created heterogeneous groups to work together and help one another learn.
There is a select group of students with IEPs and multiple ELLs that need extra academic support.The
more advanced students are willing to help those in their groups with the tasks at hand. By having ELL
students grouped and paired in heterogeneous groups, I have seen an improvement of these students’
skills when responding orally to questions and discussing the lesson and texts. Group work with
heterogeneous groups also prevents cliques and divisive relationships among students.
Accommodations/Adaptations/ Intervention (TEACHER, LEARNER, INSTRUCTION,
MANAGEMENT)
Focus student #1: Special needs (IEP goals; Focus student #2: English Language Learner
504; SST) (ELL); standard English Learner (SEL)
● Has IEP and paraprofessional
● Intelligent, gifted\ ● ccident (head injury)
A
● IEP goal of making friends ● brain damage impairs learning
● visual and auditory learner so will ● He’s a loner and does not interact with
excel with use of graphic organizer others
● Cerebral Palsy (wheelchair) ● CELDT determined ELL so I will use
● Eye tracking device to communicate ELL scaffold to check for
● Relies on the care provider understanding
● Has a paraprofessional (inside and ● Home language is Spanish
outside the classroom) ● Does not ask for help
● Learns faster than peers ● Group work encourages him to ask for
● Excels in math help and help others
● bullied by the other students. ● Excelles on individual homework
● family is loving and supportive assignments but not tests
● Group work allows student to feel a part ● Good student: attendance, respectful,
of the class rather than just having the ● Not a strong reader or speaker but
attention of his paraprofessional group dynamic helps improve
● Have Steven pair with another student speaking--sharing theme in pairs in
when determining theme while the front of class will help this skill
paraprofessional is with group-- allows ● Visual learner (visual representations
him to feel included while still being and examples)
supported in accordance of IEP ● Provide multiple means of
representation and engagement since
visual and kinesthetic
● should have him sit in the front so that
he can hear him better.
●
(TEACHER, LEARNER, TARGET, ASSESSMENT, INSTRUCTION, MANAGEMENT)
Multiple means of How will students engage in the process of new learning? How will
engagement the content become accessible, meaningful, and relevant to the
learner? How will you monitor and assess this process?
Multiple means of What principles of choice for the product of learning will you
expression accept? How will you provide a space for communication,
(Practice & assessment) creativity, critical thinking, and collaboration (4C’s)? Which
measures will you use to assess products of learning?
Managing the classroom How will you manage the classroom/setting so students transition
environment successfully their instructional stages and student groupings? How
will you create an optimal learning environment (space, time,
pacing, interactions, expectations, assessment)?
Pairings will be predetermined before the start of the lesson to facilitate
Simultaneously a quick transition from lecture to group work. During my explanation
of theme, students will take out their composition books and takes notes
that they can refer to later when collaborating with their peers. Though
the pairs are predetermined, they change often so that students do not
work with the same student every time. These pairs are randomized and
produce groupings of mixed ability. This also provides another means
of engagement as the person they work with is different every time.
Because this is not the first time we have done collaborative work in
pairs, students are aware of the class expectations when collaborating,
which includes: remaining on task, being respectful, maintaining a
proper noise level, etc. I will divide the lesson into four main stages
(Explain, Model, Close Reading, and Share) in order to properly
manage time. In terms of space, the desks are grouped into tables to
facilitate collaboration.
STAGE 2: TEACHING
Introduce Topic:
● Ask students what their favorite show/movie/book is and what message/lesson they gained
from it (class discussion)
Explain:
● Explain to students that theme is message/lesson author wants to communicate to the reader
● Have students take notes in cornell style (“theme” on left, definition on right)
● Explain that in order to identify the theme, students must pay attention to the characters' actions
and words
● Tell students that words and actions happen for a reason--think about what happens as a result
of actions
● Introduce Big Question when thinking about theme: “What message does the author want to
get across to the reader?”
Share:
● Have pairs share summaries in front of class (informal assessment)
● Let pairs display graphic organizer/summary in way they see fit (Google Doc, Google Slides,
SmartBoard, whiteboard, etc.)
● After each pair shares, open discussion to class: Was the evidence sound? Proper summary?
Clues lead to theme? Agree or disagree? Why? (informal assessments)
● Have students return to assigned seats after all share
● Computers (Chromebooks)
● Whiteboard
● Composition books
● SmartBoard
● iPads
● Textbooks
At the end of this lesson, I will be able to adapt my instruction for this group of students as the
formative assessments will allow to identify and rectify any gaps in students’ learning. I can return to
this lesson the next day to clarify any confusion.
MY PERSONAL REFLECTION
What new information did I get about my students in relation to their learning preferences?
In this lesson we may learn a little more about how his students learn and interact with one another. I
will also be able to determine if my class benefits from visual learning (videos, graphic organizers,
modeling)
Depending on the outcome of the informal assessment data, I will be able to either continue with the
current method of instruction or change to incorporate different models of teaching to help all of the
students in the class.
How effective were my practices? What will I keep, what will I improve and what will I discard?
Students worked well in the group assignments. For the ELL students the visuals and video helped by
showing the themes, ideas, and ways to gather textual evidence. Next time, I will make groups of four
rather than pairs to make the sharing aspect of the lesson less repetitive and therefore more engaging.
We learned that as a teacher it is important to create activities that help all types of learners to be
successful in the lessons. This lesson helped us to design creative and universal for the students.