Page 1 of 2

Republic of the Philippines

NORTHWEST SAMAR STATE UNIVERSITY
Calbayog City Campus

FINAL DEMONSTRATION TEACHING RATING SHEET

Student Teacher: ____________________________________________________________
Cooperating Teacher:_________________________________________________________
Subject Demonstrated:_______________Date:________Time: Started ______Ended: _____
School:_____________________________________________________________________

Direction: Please check the student teacher's numerical rating of the given item on the
column to which it is found

O VS S US Poor
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR 10 8 6 4 2
I. CLASSROOM PREPARATION/MANAGEMENT
1. Classroom was structured to enhance learning.
(Display boards, seating arrangements, lights and ventilation)
2. All necessary visual aid/instructional materials
were prepared ahead of time.
3. Board work was prepared before classes started.
4. Teacher was flexible in his/her time management.
5. He/she maintained order and discipline in the classroom.
Total Score
Sub Rating : (total score/5) x 20%

II. TEACHING AND LEARNING PROCESS ( 50%)

The Teacher
1. Clearly formulated the objectives of the lesson.
2. Attained the objectives of the lesson.
3. Showed proficiency in the required language of instruction.
4. Presented the lesson in a way which captured the interest
of the learners.
5. Use real life situation, concrete objects, print and non-print
materials in the presentation/development of the lesson.
6. Consider interweaving of task/skills/process and content.
7. Provided meaningful connections between and among learning
opportunities, prior knowledge, relevant events and the
learner's lives and experiences.
8. Employed/utilized integrative strategies
___ integration of values in the subject taught.
___ integration of Science and Health concepts in English
as content.
___ integration of SK/HKS concepts in Filipino as content
___ integration of EPP, HKS and MSEP.
___ integration across learning areas.

9. Provided varied activities to encourage participation of

everyone specially slow learners.
10. Provided varied activities for interactive/group work/cooperative
learning.

revised: CY 2009
 Page 2 of 2

O VS S US Poor
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR 10 8 6 4 2

11. Acted as facilitator during class discussion.

12. Provided varied learning activities congruent to the objectives
lessons.
13. Recognized pupils individual differences and provided activities for
remediation reinforcement enrichment

14. Asked questions that developed critical skills,

e.g. open ended uestions.
15. Gave homework as a follow-up of the lesson
/used textbook/materials, clearly/appropriately
/ used instructional materials creatively to get ideas across.
16. Showed mastery of the subject matter.
The Pupils
17. Were actively engaged troughout the lesson.
18. Asked/answered questions reflecting Higher Order Thinking Skills.
19. Were generally happy in class.
20. Were generally motivated to learn more.
Total Score
Sub Rating : (total score/20) x 50%

III. Assessment of Pupils

1. Learning was evaluated through seatwork exercises/paper
and pencil tests,portfolio assessment, etc.
2. Learner's other needs were diagnosed after the lesson.
3. The lesson was assessed to determine if the objectives
were attained within the alloted time.
Total Score
Sub Rating : (total score/3) x 20%

IV. Classroom Interaction

(rate the teaching-learning process as a whole in terms of interaction)

1. Teacher-Pupil interaction.
2. Pupil-pupil interaction.
3. Pupil-materials interaction.
Total Score
Sub Rating : (total score/3) x 10%

FINAL RATING

COMMENTS/SUGGESTIONS:

EVALUATOR
(signature over printed name)

revised: CY 2009