by Caston Makaka
CHAPTER 1 Introduction
CHAPTER 9 Birds are the present day champions of the land Tetrapods
CHAPTER 1
Introduction
This module focuses on the diversity of animal life, a subject dreaded by many students of
biology. This dread is often reflected when the same students take up positions as lecturers,
when the course is often thrown from one lecturer to another. Many years of teaching this
course has shown that one need not know all the animal groups and the often times difficult
names to be comfortable in the area. For beginners, a basic understanding of the unifying
features and differentiating characteristics will go a long way in making the student find
his/her way through the myriad of animal groups. It is our hope that this module will help
students in appreciating the fact that in the myriad of animal life forms, there are basic
unifying features, which can be used to better understand the diversity of animals.
In this module the student is introduced to the concept of biodiversity, the nature of
metazoans, basic classification; the features important in uniting and separating the major
animal groups; and lastly a survey of the major animal phyla are given. It is impossible to
delve into animal diversity without making reference to evolution. The concept of evolution
will come out as the basis for all the diversity of animals present today. Evolutionary trends
will be highlighted in the major animal groups and the evidence for this will become
apparent as some of the diagnostic features of the animals will be reviewed. The dictum
that ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny will also be explored in illustrating the similarities
and differences between animal life. It is hoped that the selection of the animal groups used
in this module will not be misconstrued by the student as prioritising groups on the basis of
the author’s areas of interests but for purposes of illustrating evolutionary patterns.
Metazoans are multicellular, motile, heterotrophic organisms with a blastula stage in their
life cycle. Although motility may not always be an exhibited feature of metazoans in all life
stages, other features are normally quite evident even to the casual observer. Being
A number of theories have been put forward to explain the origins of metazoans (see
Rapport 1992) but the colonial theory seems to be the most plausible one. According to this
theory, metazoans are thought to have evolved from colonial flagellated protozoans,
probably the choanoflagellates or colonial ciliates. The individual cells in the colony are
thought to have been held together by an extracellular matrix (ECM). These protozoans,
living as a colony (Figure 1.1), are thought to have developed some interdependence which
made the colony more successful than the individual solitary forms. This colony is
envisioned to have evolved some form of differentiation, with an anterior end and a
posterior end and some cells specialised for locomotion and sensation, others for feeding
and still others for reproduction.
The new evolutionary invention (the blastea), taking place some 650million years ago in the
Cambrian is thought to have been highly successful and further evolution gave rise to
numerous multicellular metazoans. It is important to note, though that, not all evolutionary
lines were successful. Many blind ending lines in the fossil record are a testimony to the
millions of species that could not make it in the struggle for survival. The evolution of
animals, therefore, like the evolution of any other life forms, was not as it were, like a
guided form of branching, each with all the necessary tools for a successful lineage. We
need not emphasise the fact that all extant animal forms are a result of successful lineages
that have managed to make it to this day since some 3.5 billion years ago when the first life
forms emerged. Their existence today is however not an assurance of their continued
survival in the ever unending repertoire of life's demands. Many species are getting extinct
each day that passes by and still many more are on their way out. The African elephant
(Loxodonta africana) has been cited as one such species whose heydays are long past and is
on its way out.
Biodiversity or biological diversity is the variety of life in all its forms, levels and combinations,
including ecosystem diversity, species diversity and genetic diversity. Just as there are many
different ways to define biodiversity, there are many different measures of biodiversity. Most
measures quantify the number of traits, individuals, or species in a given area while taking into
account their degree of dissimilarity. Some measure biodiversity on a genetic level while others
measure within a single habitat or between ecosystems.
Traditionally there are two levels at which biodiversity has been described. In effect it uses
genetic diversity as a basis for valuing both species diversity (for their relative richness in
different genes) and ecosystem diversity (for the relative richness in the different processes to
which the genes ultimately contribute) (Foram Mehta, 2013)
In its simplest form Biodiversity refers to the totality of life in its various forms. When
taxonomic diversity is the point of reference, commonly, the species is the unit used as a
surrogate for assessing this biodiversity. Total biodiversity in the biosphere may never be
known. Biologists have approached the issue of coming up with total global diversity from
two angles: use of estimates and real inventories. Estimates of total biodiversity given by
various authorities have been precipitated by the knowledge that the number of newly
discovered organisms is quite large (about 13 000 species per year); pointing to the fact that
whatever total diversity is known to science is a miniscule amount of the total in the
biosphere. Thus, estimates have been obtained by inferring total diversity from well known
groups and the simplest of these approaches to calculating biodiversity is to compare the
ratio of known to unknown faunas. In 1985, Peter Raven postulated that for birds, mammals
and other well known animals, there are roughly twice as many tropical species than
temperate climate species. If this were true of all organisms, then of the 1.5 million species
It is now known that this approach is inaccurate because birds and mammals comprise only
a tiny fraction of all life forms and are not at all indicative of species such as insects, which
are often 10 times as numerous in a given tropical location as for a temperate area.
Erwin used the "bug bomb" method in which he fogged the tree canopy with insecticide and
collected thousands of dying insects as they fell into a number of big funnels placed on the
forest floor beneath. From these samples gathered over three seasons from the same spot,
tentative numbers were then available, from which Erwin drew his conclusions. He
calculated that there are 163 species of beetles living in the canopy of a single species of
tree. In turn, there are about 50,000 species of tropical trees worldwide, so this comes out
to 8,150,000 species of beetles. Then, assuming that beetles represent 40% of all arthropod
species, and finally that there are twice as many arthropods (mostly insects) in the canopy
than on the ground, came up with a rounded estimate of 30 million species for the world's
rainforests.
The total global biodiversity was extrapolated using butterfly population which are a
relatively well known group of organisms. Butterflies are easy to collect and are relatively
conspicuous and thus easy to identify and collect in any survey and were used by others to
calculate global biodiversity
Finally, there is mere opinion and pure guesswork, such as the 13.6 million species "working
estimate" developed by a United Nations-sponsored "consensus" effort. The data used: a
survey of the world's leading experts on each group of living organisms, simply asking each
what they felt the speculative total was. In a big contrast to Erwin's pumped up estimates,
he discredits the diminutive 13.6 million total as the product of "armchair biology", because
it is not based on any real experimental data .
Until someone comes forward with the hard evidence to produce a conclusive number, the
global species count, will continue to be the subject of wild speculation.
The parallel use of species inventories utilised figures of species of the different life forms
found in the literature. Conservatively there are 1.75 million species (Hammond, 1992)
Rana (2005), estimates that in the animal world there are 1 032 092 animal species in 35
phyla. These estimates are claimed to have been arrived at by taking an inventory of all
animal species known to science as cited in the literature. Rana’s inventory of the major
animal groups is depicted in Table 1.1. Earlier, Brusca et al (2003), by taking an inventory of
all animal phyla presented in the literature had come up with a total of 1 335 188 animal
species.
Table 1.1: Inventory of the major animal groups (After Rana, 2005)
The number of species in a given area is known as its species richness (S). The species being
the basic unit of classification is the most practical and commonly used currency when
referring to biodiversity. Species richness can be considered at various spatial levels; local,
regional and global. It is thus important to note that species richness is highly dependent on
the size of the area considered or sampled, as any increase in land area, results in an
increase in species richness. In fact for every 10-fold increase in area there is a doubling in
species richness. Rana’s inventory shown in the table above is at the global scale.
The number of species given by many authorities remains estimates and the completeness
and accuracy of the global animal diversity cannot be ascertained. The number of species
that still remain unknown and to be incorporated into the inventory is not known. A number
of reasons can be cited to account for this deficiency. The animal species record is not
adequate in part, because, many species have not been described. This is largely so because
of the daunting task of learning and familiarising with the already described fauna. In
addition one can only recognize the yet unidentified species if he/she knows those that have
been described.
Although the larger animal groups are relatively better known to science, the smaller ones
are hazily known. It is an acknowledged fact that there are by far fewer taxonomists for
invertebrates and particularly the Hexapoda (insects), which form the bulk of metazoans
11 Caston Makaka (in prep)
(about 85%) than for the larger animal groups. The species inventory is also largely
inaccurate because of errors of judgement. As pointed out by Gaston and Mound (1993),
the existing inventory contains large amounts of hidden synonymy. Synonymy arises when a
single species is given two or more names as a result of being erroneously recognized by
two observers as such. Thus whilst new discoveries and descriptions tend to increase the
species inventory list, many of these are later referred to synonymy for arbitration. For
example in 1979, 2116 species of beetles were newly described, but some 426 species were
later found to have been described before. For the years 1986-1987 and 1988-1989, the
rates of synonymy in the major insect orders were of the rates of 1/3 of the number of
newly described species in those years.
Although synonymy tends to pull down the numbers (once discovered) it is important to
note that there are certain groups of animals where very little is known. A case in point is
the terrestrial arthropods. In this group, already, close to a million species are recognised,
still a lot is anticipated from this phylum. Estimates put the undescribed at between 1 and
100 million, but conservative estimates are between 2-3 and 20 million, and for insects
alone, 10 million (Wilson, 1992). A large proportion of the undescribed species are thought
to be in the tropics and especially in third world countries.
We have referred to the total number of organisms in a locality demarcated at any scale as
the species richness (S). Species richness is a common way of measuring biodiversity and
involves counting the number of individuals - or even families – within a given area. This is also
expressed as Alpha diversity (α-diversity). This can be measured by counting the number of
taxa (distinct groups of organisms) within the ecosystem. For example, in a study of avian
communities in Hwange Main Camp, Hwange National Park, Zimbabwe, the author,
together with Mazire Samantha (2014) assessed alpha diversity by considering the number
species and noted that there were a total of 41 bird species. This is the α diversity for the
area. For birds, α diversity can simply be determined by undertaking a bird count as you
traverse the area. As one moves from one locality into another undertaking the same bird
count, one will encounter, in addition to those species already encountered, other new
species. As one goes through this second locality he/she will realize that not only had he/she
encountered new species, but some species encountered in the first were not encountered
in the second. The species encountered in the second locality also constitute the α diversity
for this second locality but the total number of species peculiar to either locality is called the
β diversity. At the ecosystem-level, measures of β diversity are often used to compare two
ecosystems or to determine changes over time in a given region. Beta diversity measures the
present and changes of species diversity between ecosystems; this involves comparing the
number of taxa that are unique to each of the ecosystems. In simpler terms, it calculates the
number of species that are not the same in two different environments. The resulting number
indicates to researchers whether there is any overlap in the species found in each group. Beta
diversity is given by the formula:
β = (S1 − c) + (S2 − c)
where S1 are number of species found in the first locality (community),
S2 are number of species found in the second locality (community) and C is
the number of species found in both communities.
Table 1.2: Hypothetical species, alpha (α), beta (β) and gamma (γ) diversities for three
communities.
Beta (β) diversity is more often represented by the similarities and not differences between
samples or communities. Two major indices of similarities are commonly used. These are
Jacquards’ coefficient of similarity and Soerensen similarity ( ) index. QS is given by the
following formula:
Diversity indices
Although many authors are contended with the use of the concept of species richness as a
good representation of diversity, some advocate for the use of some other indices that factor
in species abundance. One such index is the Shannon Wiener index of diversity. The Shannon
Wiener diversity index ( ) is calculated using the following formula:
Where is the proportion of individuals belonging to the ith species in the data set.
Using this index, a community with relatively high proportions of each species will have a
high diversity index indicating high diversity in the species than one in which a few species
are predominant. This is illustrated by the two communities shown below each with a
species richness of 3 but different Shannon diversity indices.
Figure 1.2: Two communities with the same species richness (S=3) but having different
Shannon diversity indices, being higher in the second community due to equal
representation.
= -∑ -0.364-0.321-0.258-0.231-0.202-0.163-0.066-0.025 = 1.63
The Shannon diversity indices for the other two communities have also been calculated and
are shown in the Table 1.3 below.
Table 1.3: Hypothetical species, numbers and diversities for three communities
If we make comparisons amongst the three communities with regards to total individuals,
the Miombo woodland, though having the least species richess (S=6), has the highest total
population of 671. On the other hand, although having the highest population, it has the
lowest Shannon diversity index (H'=1.32) because of the uneveness of species populations in
this community. A comparison of Grassland and Acacia communinities with the same
species richness (S=8) and the same total populations (438), diversity, as expressed by the
Shannon diversity index, is higher (H'=2.10 in the Accacia woodland because of the near
equality of the species populations as compared to the Grassland community (H'=1.63).
Shannon’s equitability (E H') can be calculated by dividing H' by H'max (here H'max =InS)
H'max is the maximum diversity of a community (plot/site/sample) when all species are
equally abundant and this is equivalent to In S. If there is complete evenness of species
abundances in the grassland community then each species would be represented by 438/8
or 54.75 individuals. Then
15 Caston Makaka (in prep)
H'max=-∑ (54.75/438In54.75/438) + (54.75/438In54.75/438) + (54.75/438In54.75/438) +
(54.75/438In54.75/438) + (54.75/438In54.75/438)+ (54.75/438In54.75/438) +
(54.75/438In54.75/438) + (54.75/438In54.75/438) =2.079
And since H'max = InS we can still arrive at the same answer by the formula:
Equitability (evenness) assumes a value between 0 and 1 with 1 being complete evenness.
Another index which takes into consideration the abundances of species is the Simpson
diversity ( ) index. It measures the probability that two individuals randomly selected from a
sample will belong to the same species. Simpson’s diversity index is then obtained by summing
up these probabilities.
The Simpson diversity index is calculated from the formula:
λ=
For the Grassland community the Simpson diversity index would be calculated as follows
λ =∑n (n-1)/N (N-1)
=185(184)/438(437) +87(86)/438(437) +54(53)/438(437) +44(43)/438(437) +35(34)/4389437)
+25(24)/438(437) +7(6)/438(437) +1(0)/438(437)
=0.178+0.039+0.0149+0.0099+0.0062+0.00313+0.000156+0.0
=0.251
The Simpson diversity index is also sometimes called the dominance index on the basis that
the contribution of the dorminant species in the community overrides the rest and those
with very few individuals contributing very little if any. Notice the very high contribution
made by species A (0.178) in the overall figure and the zero (0.0) contribution made by
species H. The Simpson diversity indices for the three hypothetical communities are shown
in Table 1.3 above. The Miombo woodland has the highest Simpson diversity index because
of the predominace of a few species (species C) in the community.
And for the Miombo and Acaccia woodland they are 51 and 14 respectively. The dorminant
species in these communities are A, C and F respectively.
The dominance of a single species is also visually evident when we consider the rank
abundance graph for a community which conforms to the quite common phenomenon
observed for many communities where there is usually a single dominant species with other
species contributing fewer and fewer individuals. The rank abundances of avian Orders
found in Main Camp Hwange is in consonance with this pattern (Fig 1.3).
In a study of bird species in a national park in Ghana, Wiafe et al (2010) set the relative
status for each species based on frequency of occurrence as follows:
• Super-common: species occurring within more than 50% of the census plots/sites
• Common: species found in between 20–49% of the census plots/sites
• Uncommon: species occurring within between 11–19% of the census plots
Weighted diversity
Some biologists are of the opinion that diversity based on purely richness and abundance
figures does not capture the real diversity and value of species and commuinties. In essence
they maintain that species are not equal. Some are more equal than others. To this end they
advocate for some way of placing value to those more valuable species when coming up
with diversity indices. Of note are those that advocate for the incorporation of a weighting
factor in the diversity index with the result that a community with many important species
(keystone species or rarer species) is considered richer than one with a fewer such species.
Still others place more weight on diversity at higher taxonomic level with the result that if
two communities have the same number of species, the one having the species from
different genera or families is considered richer than the one with all the species belonging
to the same genus or family.
The placing of more weight on taxa that do not have close relatives is also considered
worthwhile. The tautara lizards (Sphenodon) of New Zealand has sometimes been equated
to all the other reptilian groups (totalling 6 000 species) simply on the basis that it is quite
isolated in terms of kinship. This genus has remained quite unmodified and has given rise to
very few species ever since the age of reptiles, Mesozoic era, some 65 to 248million years
ago.
If more weight is placed on species which are contributing very little to rapid diversification
(speciation), what value should be placed on those that are really contributing immensely to
this divergence? This was a question that others thought about seriously and concluded
that instead of giving credit where it is not due, the rapidly diversifying taxa should be given
more weight in indices of diversity. However the placing of some form of weighting is
sometimes quite prudent when priorities of communities to be conserved are being made.
Otherwise for all other purposes of gaining insights into the diversity of species, species
richness is considered suffice. It is also important to note that for all other indices, the
starting point is to know the different forms and species and the taxa to which they belong.
We will begin with that aspect in this module.
Functional diversity
Before we leave measures and assesssements of diversity let us consider another form of
diversity which, like weighted diversity, is imported from an ecological vview point. This is
functional diversity. Functional diversity considers the varieties of organism from a
functional point of view. An ecosystem which contains primary and secondary consumers
only is less diverse than one which contains primary producers, primary consumers and
secondary consumers which in turn is less rich than another which contains primary
producers, primary consumers, secondary consumers and tertiary consumers. In the same
line of thinking, an aquatic system which contains shredders only is less diverse than one
containing shredders and scrappers and detritus feeders.
Mittermeir and Werner (1990) introduced the term megadiversity centres to refer to those
areas where biodiversity is comparatively very high. Using this concept, a number of
regions/countries have been classified as megadiversity centres. These are Brazil, Zaire,
Madagascar, Columbia, Eucador, Peru, China, India, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Australia.
In a 1999 analysis, published in the book Hotspots: Earth’s Biologically Richest and Most
Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions, and a year later in the scientific journal Nature (Myers,
et al., 2000), 25 biodiversity hotspots were identified. Collectively, these areas held as
endemics no less than 35 percent of terrestrial vertebrates in an area that formerly covered
only 11.8 percent of the planet’s land surface. The habitat extent of this land area had been
reduced by 87.8 percent of its original extent, such that this wealth of biodiversity was
Biodiversity gradients
A closer look at the geographical positions of the megadiversity centres/countries proposed
by Mittermneir and Werner (1990) shows that most of them are located along or within the
tropics and very few if any from the temperate regions. This leads us to the concept of
biodiversity gradients. The one already alluded to here is the tropical- temperate
biodiversity gradient. Generally, there are more species within the tropics and fewer in the
temperate regions, thus there is a gradual decrease from the tropics to the temperate
regions. This has partly been attributed to the high primary productivity in tropical plants as
a result of the high sunlight intensities and rainfall regimes. This high primary productivity in
turn supports a rich fauna, which, with increased competition, leads to rapid speciation and
hence diversity. Another gradient which has been noted is altitudinal. It has been noted that
in some cases as altitude increases species richness decreases.This has been attributed to, in
part, to a decrease in temperature and oxygen concentrations with altitude.
In the major aquatic environments such as the seas and oceans, biodiversity, apart from
showing the latitudinal gradient shown by terrestrial life also shows variation with depth.
Most life forms occur in the top layers of waters which constitute the photosynthetic zone
because of high light intensities and sufficient dissolved oxygen. With increase in depths the
amount of light penetrating to these depths markedly decreases and life forms also
decrease as only carnivorous and suspension or detritus feeders become the only thriving
life forms.
Endemism is often found to be associated with certain biological features such as gigantism,
dwarfism, and low levels of self incompatibility, greater tendency towards asexual
reproduction, lower overall reproductive effort and poor dispersal abilities than widespread
species in the same area.
To date, classification in biology, apart from using the same morphological and anatomical
features has moved on to look at embryonic features, histology, cytology, ecological,
behavioural and now very commonly, biochemistry. Organisms hitherto grouped together
using the old criteria are being re-examined using these new methods, in some cases
confirming the earlier relationships and in some cases (a lot of them) unveiling completely
new kinships. As these new revelations come to light, new phylogenetic trees are being
reconstructed.
The importance of classification need not be over-emphasized. In everyday life we see how
life is made much easier by simply packing grocery items of similar use in the same shelves
in supermarkets, and books of same disciplines in the same shelves in libraries. Classification
in biology serves a number of functions: it simplifies the study of organisms by grouping
organisms sharing a number of features in common; it helps make inferences; and finally it
shows phylogenetic relations between organisms. The importance of making inferences
dawned to this author when he was asked a question on the reproductive biology of
chameleons as an undergraduate by a high school student who had a very high regard for
Whilst different schools of classification have immerged, they all seem, in the end to point
to some form of relationships between the organisms concerned. The phenetic school of
classification emphasizes the importance of taking into consideration as many shared
features as possible and working out where the strongest relationships lay by finding those
that share the greatest number of features in common. This has been made easy by the use
of computers that can handle large quanties of data. The Phylogenetic school on the other
hand argues that not all features are of evolutionary importance and not all of them should
be lumped together to find evolutionary relationships- only those that are of some
evolutionary importance should be considered, Not doing so, they argue, would result in
finding relationships in distantly related species showing convergent evolution. Whilst in
cladistic classification, emphasis is put on the branching patterns. (See Mayr, 1981 for a
review of these schools of thought).
The simplest unit or category of classification, as earlier indicated, is the species. So many
definitions have been muted as to what a species is and the definition given here is a
composite of all these definitions. It defines a species as a group of organisms of common
ancestry, sharing many characteristics in common, occupying the same habitat and niche,
and capable of interbreeding to produce viable offspring. This can be regarded as an all
encompassing definition put together to try and pin down the very elusive concept of a
species. Using one part of the definition may not be adequate as experience has shown. For
example defining a species as a group of organisms capable of interbreeding (the biological
species concept), though, applicable to many species may not be adequate in others. Slight
variations in behaviour patterns and biological clocks may guard against interbreeding in a
group of organisms of the same species temporarily separated by a barrier for a
considerable length of time.
Two or more species may seem quite related but do not satisfy the criteria to be classified
as a single species. These are grouped together in bigger grouping (category) referred to as
a Genus. Related genera constitute a Family and closely related Families form an Order.
Related Orders make a Class which in turn constitute a Phylum, and ultimately a Kingdom.
Often times an even higher category, Super kingdom, is included at the top of the hierarchy
(Figure 2.1). This classification is called Natural Biological Classification and it envisions
natural relations of decreasing affinities as we go up the ladder. By grouping a number of
Very often some intermediate categories are also included in the hierarchy and these tend
to complicate the whole hierarchy. These include subspecies, strains and varieties to refer
to subtypes of the same species and super species to refer to closely related species within a
genus. Other categories include sub- and super genus, sub- and super family, sub- and super
order, sub- and super class, sub- and super phylum etc. For our purposes here we restrict
ourselves to the use of the larger categories in the hierarchy.
As we have already alluded to, in biological classification, animals are grouped basing on
shared characteristics.The actual animal group that is placed in each category is called the
taxon. Thus the taxon Echinodermata is placed at the hierarchical level corresponding to the
category phylum: Echinodermata is the taxon; phylum is category. If we consider the
classification of humans the following categories and taxons are used.
Category Taxon
Phylum Chordata
Subphylum Vertebrata (Craniata)
Class Mammalia
Order Primate
By convention the species name is followed by the authors name and a year, the person
who first described the organism Homo sapiens and gave it its name, and the year the
description was publised. In the case of humans it was Carl Linneaus in the year 1758.
The second feature is that the number of shared (unifying) characteristics become fewer as
we go up the hierarchy. Thus, whilst all extant humans (Homo sapiens) share many
characteristics in common {e.g. sweat glands and pores on almost entire skin surface, very
short fine hair giving a naked look, a prominent chin, receding jaw and brow bones, cranial
capacity of around 1600cm3 , complex brain with high intelligence, large brain to mass ratio,
fingers with nails, prehensile hand with opposable thumb capable of both precision and
power grip and highly manipulative with intricate co-ordination of hands with brains, ,
upright walking with striding gait, ability to communicate using speech and symbols, ability
to use and make tools, unusually extended parental care for offspring, a complex social
system based on sharing and cooperation, purposefulness, the ability to build in the brain,
to scheme and plot with a vision of the outcome (creativity) and many others too many to
exhaust here}, the number of features we share with closely related forms in the genus
Homo are considerably fewer, more so in the family Hominidae that we belong together
with our distant fossil relatives like the Australopithecines and Pithecanthropus This is
markedly so in the Order primate and up the hierarchy.
How a species is defined will have bearing on the overall number of organisms described by
man. As we have already noted various species concepts have been put forward to try and
define what a species is for the various forms of life and varying reproductive and biological
traits. But whatever definition is used to pin down what a species is, a set of rules have to be
followed upon recognition of a new species so that it becomes known to science. The
International Code on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN) is a set of laid down rules,
recommendations and procedures to be followed by all zoologists to make new species
names available to science. The International Code on Zoological Nomenclature was
adopted by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature in 1901 and declared
Having discovered a new species, and, having satisfied oneself that it is indeed a new
species through consultation of available literature, or comparing it to related types in a
collection, a taxonomist has to follow, among other things the following: He/she will have to
give it a name following the binomial nomenclature. This is a system of naming a species
first proposed and used by Carl von Linne, the great naturalist of the 18th century. Carl
himself was able to describe and name more than 12 400 species (8 000 plant species and 4
400 animals including Homo sapiens) during his lifetime and thus is often credited as the
father of taxonomy. Binomial nomenclature involves giving the species a two name name-
binomen (meaning two names). The first name is the genus name and the second is the
specific name. The specific name should always be in Latin or be Latinized by adding a suffix
which makes it sound Latin. To emphasize this aspect, the originator of this system, Carl
himself, Latinized his own name, thus he become known as Carolus von Linnaeus. Thus,
following this rule, the familiar canine (familiar dog) is called Canis familliaris. The first name
being the generic name and the second name is the specific name (trivial name). The genus
name is the genus to which the species belong. The genus name should always be initialled
with a capital letter and the specific name with a small letter. In writing, the whole species
name should always be underlined and in printing it should always be italicized. Thus for
humankind and the migratory locusts the names are cited as Homo sapiens and Locusta
migratoria, respectively. The subfamily name is formed by adding the suffix -inae to the
stem of the genus name and the family is coined by adding the suffix -idea. Thus the
subfamily and family to which humans belong are Hominae and Hominidae respectively. The
superfamily standard ending is –oidea.
During the times of Carl, it is important to mention that each species used to have a long
name (a polynomial) which was descriptive in nature. Those who read “Hard Times” by
Charles Dickens would recall the Victorian era definition given by young Tom when asked to
define a horse in class by his teacher, Mr Mchokmchild. He gave a long definition of a horse
sounding like “.....a quadrupled, graminivorous, nonruminant...” That indeed was a
polynomial. Such was the nature of the names that they were mouthfilling and cumbersome
in saying them out and writing, and, in one of his treaties or essays, Carl decided to use
short hand to denote each species. It is this short hand, because it had two names (a genus
name and an epithet or specific name) that was later to be adopted and become the usual
way of referring to a species.
To make the species name available to science the author should publish it. For a name to
be said to have been published, the author should write an article and make it accessible in
large enough quantities to be distributed to other stalk holders (biologists and in particular
zoologists). Today, this usually involves publishing in a scientific journal. The article must
detail the morphology and/ anatomy, and if needs be , even the biochemistry, histology and
other aspects of the new find, highlighting the aspects that are significantly different from
other closely related species and hence warranting it to deserve being placed in its own
taxon. The description can be in the form of diagrams, descriptive statements, pictures and
sometimes acoustic recordings, behaviour patterns or any such evidence that will be of help
in separating it from other closely related forms. The location the new species was found,
Although the process of identifying new species and fixing of names appear meticulous and
thus not prone to error, many errors of judgement do occur and when they are eventually
discovered, are brought to a panel of Zoologists who arbitrate on such issues. Most cases
have to do with synonymy and homonymy. As we have already pointed out, synonymy
occurs when a species has accidentally been named more than once. The effect of this is to
inflate the species list and hence species richness. This may occur as a result of two authors
observing two developmental stages of the same organism and hence naming the two
morphological stages as different species. Once this type of error is discovered, whether by
one of the authors or by a third party, it is brought to the attention of the international
Panel of Zoologists for arbitration. In such cases, the senior name has priority over the junior
name. Thus, although both names are available to science, the senior name is considered
the valid name for the species and the other is discarded completely. The senior name is the
name which was given by the first author, i.e. the one who described and named it earliest.
In some cases the junior name may not necessarily be thrown away as in cases where the
junior name, because of popularity arising otherwise from extensive use or the stature of
the author. Discarding such a popularly known and used name may not do justice to many
who were very familiar with the species as associated with the name. In such cases,
although the senior name has priority over the junior name, the latter is retained and is
usually included after the senior name but in parenthis.
Homonymy occurs when two taxa have been united into one. Arbitration here involves
separating these into two taxa of which they really are. In such cases the taxon which was
described first retains the name and the second is given another name
As alluded to earlier in this chapter, although many species are described and named, a
significantly large proportion is later referred for arbitration because of hidden synonymy
and homonymy.
Classification Criteria.
In an introductory book of this nature our classification would rather remain at the coarse or
higher levels of classification such as Phyla (and in some cases Classes). Classification at such
higher ranks (i.e. class and phylum) should basically be broad based. That is, the features
used should be all inclusive. These features are highly conserved over generations. As
classification cascades down to lower and lower ranks more exact features become useful to
29 Caston Makaka (in prep)
separate closely related forms. Such classification becomes based on less conserved
features, characteristics controlled by more or highly mutable genes. The criteria considered
here is thus at very high levels and highly conserved features will be used. Most of such
highly conserved features are controlled by highly conserved genes called hox genes.Thus,
for example, genes which regulate growth rates and patterns (hox genes) also determine
the symmetry of the resultant animal. These appear to be highly conserved genes and are
represented quite extensively in the animal world as their effects permeate across wide
groups and determine underlining unifying features. This is ease to grasp when we note that
despite the differences in form, the phenomena of bilateral or radial symmetry transcends
across phyla. Despite chasms of differences certain underlying developmental patterns
separate and unite animal groups. It is such highly conserved features which we will use for
the purposes of separating and unifying the varied metazoan groups.
Although modern relationships in taxonomy are now largely based on molecular features
and biochemistry, these, to a large extent serve to confirm or dispel previously held kinships
(especially at species level) and we will make reference to them as they crop up.
Bilaterally symmetrical animals posses right and left sides that are approximate mirror
images of each other. In such animals, there is usually an anterior and posterior end, and
sense organs, to a more or less extent concentrated in the anterior portion of the animal.
This is referred to as cephalisation. This allows the animal, because it moves with the
anterior portion forwards, to be able to explore the new environment it is moving into
before the whole body moves on. The concentration of nervous tissues and sense organs in
the anterior portion is in consonance with the principle of neurobiotaxis which insists that a
concentration of nervous material evolves in the area of maximum environmental
stimulation (Parker and Haswell, 2003).
Bilateral symmetry has become synonymous with animals to the extent that many people
fail to appreciate any other form of symmetry in the animal world, and this is one reason
why many people fail to recognize animals with other forms of symmetry like the sponges,
cnidarians and echinoderms as metazoans in pictures and videos on TV sets.
From an evolutionary view point, bilateral animals are thought to be more evolved than
radially symmetrical animals. Using this line of thinking the echinoderms (like the sea
urchins) would be placed very close to the Cnidarians, for having radial symmetry, however
studies have shown that the former are even more advanced to warrant being placed
ahead of even such groups like the nematodes and annelids. Investigations have shown
that the embryo of these animals show typical bilateral symmetry, implying that the adult
pentaradial symmetry is a secondary evolutionary development.
It would appear that the genes for these two major types of symmetry (radial and bilateral),
evolved quite early in metazoan life and have tended to be passed down through evolution
without any modifications in these two major metazoan lines.
Using the classification based on symmetry we can add another notch onto our classification
based on levels of organisation depicted in figure 2.3. This is shown in figure 2.4. below.
Metazoans have for long time been divided into groups based upon the number of germ
layers formed during embryogenesis. These germ layers are groups of cells that behave as
distinct units during the early stages of embryonic development and give rise to distinctly
different tissues and /or organ systems in the adult. Thus metazoans can be classified as
either diploblastic, or triploblastic. Diploblastic (diplo=double) animals have only two
distinct layers following gastrulation (movement of cells into the interior of the embryo).
The outer layer is called the ectoderm and the inner layer is the endoderm. Examples of
diploblastic animals are the Cnidaria and Ctenophora.
Triploblastic (Triplo- triple) animals, which are the majority of metazoans have three germ
layers; endoderm, mesoderm and ectoderm. The mesoderm arises from either the
endodermal tissues or from a line of cells that form quite early in embryonic development
through incorporation of mesodermalizing factors in the early dividing zygote. The
mesoderm is thus a middle layer between the endoderm and ectoderm.
Figure 2.5: The body plans of metazoans based on the presence and/nature of coelom.
Source:http://image.wistatutor.com/content/animal-kingdom/body-cavity-
conditions.jpeg
One of the pieces of evidence for evolution first put forward by biologists were the
similarities between embryos of different animal groups which was used as part of the
evidence of common ancestry and popularised in the dictum 'ontogeny recapitulates
phylogeny'. According to Heackel who proposed this theory, animals, during their
embryonic development (ontogeny) retrace the morphologies and anotomies of their past
ancestral adults (phylogeny). In other words, in their embryonic development, animals pass
through the stages resembling their past ancestral forms. The exact consequence of this is
that goups of animals whose embryoes pass through a similar stage in their embryonic
devepments are deemed to have an ancestor of that form and hence the same ancestor at
some distant past. If the embryonic resemblences are transient, and, in the initial stages of
embryonic development, then they shared the same ancestor in the very long distant past
but if they are drawn out in time right up to the very late stages of development then they
are deemed to have had the same ancestor in the near distant past. Hence the more drawn
out the resemblances, the more related the groups are and Vis versa.
Although this dictum has fallen out of favour with some in the biological sciences it gives
some plausible explanations to the many relationships between the metazoans. The fact
that all metazoans pass through a blastula stage early in their embryonic development is not
a disputed fact. It is reasonable to suggest that this convergence is not by mere coincidence
and this definitely points to common ancestry in the distant past. That, later embryonic
developmental stages do vary to varying degrees in the major groups is also an uncontested
fact. It is rational to suggest that this points to later divergence of the lineages in the groups
with the passage of time.
It is usually assumed that similarity among early embryonic stages is the result of
evolutionary conservation (Seidel, 1960; Sander, 1983; Buss, 1987; Raff, 1996; and Hall,
1996 cited in Galis et al 2002). Even though von Baer (1828) did not believe in evolution by
descent, he was the first to propose that early changes in ontogeny were more likely to have
cascading consequences than later changes when most of development has already taken
place (Galis et al., 2002). The early stages of cleavage and gastrulation are often remarkably
similar among metazoans (Gilbert and Raunio, 1997). The succeeding stage, organogenesis,
is far more diverse among metazoans than cleavage and gastrulation (Gilbert and Raunio,
1997). This, as already alluded to, points to a common ancestry and subsequent divergence.
It is important to emphasize that although the similarity of cleavage and gastrulation is
largely due to conserved similarity, it is also, to an important extent due to convergence. For
a book at this level we are going to dwell on the former and students interested in the later
twist can quench their thirst in the works of Galis and Sinervo (2002).
As will become clear later, these two groups of bilaterans show marked divergence in
developmental patterns but strong similarities within each of the two groups. They have
marked differences in cleavage patterns, the stage at which cell fate is determined, the
nature of gastrulation, the fate of the blastopore and origins of the mouth or anus, origins
of the third germ layer (mesoderm) and hence coelom formation and the type of larvae
which finally develop from the embryo. It is important to emphasize at this juncture that
although one set of developmental patterns are predominantly characteristic of one group
of animals, they nonetheless are not a preserve for that animal group only. Exceptions do
occur here and there and this is the nature with many aspects in biology. This will be quite
evident when we consider the developmental stages. In summary it is suffice to say that
protostomes are characterised by the following: spiral cleavage of blastomeres, determinate
development- cell fate being determined quite early in embryonic development with the
result that twinning is not possible; mouth forming from the blastopore opening and anus
developing elsewhere.; the mesoderm derived from a mesodermal cell whose origins are
quite early in embryonic development, schizocoelic coelom formation- a coelom which
develops from the splitting of mesodermal tissue; and finally the embryo developing into a
trocophore larva. In addition to these characteristics there is a trend in the major
protostomes phyla for the presence of ventral nerve cord and a dorsal heart as shown in the
Annelid-Mollusc-Arthropod Line.
On the other hand, deuterostomes predominantly exhibit the following: radial cleavage of
blastomeres; indeterminate development -fate of cell being determined quite late in
embryonic development (at least after a few cell divisions) and hence making production of
twins quite possible in this group; gastrulation by invagination; the blastopore forming the
anus and mouth forming elsewhere; mesoderm forming through outpocketing of endoderm
and thus coelom forming through pinching off of coalesced, spherical, fluid-filled
endodermal tissue- a process called enterocoely. In addition to these characteristics there is
a trend in the major deuterostomes phyla for the presence of dorsal nerve cord and a
ventral heart as shown in the Echinoderm-Chordate Line. For us to grasp the differences
between these two groups of Bilateria we need to explore their early embryonic
development. Now, here, we make a detour and explore the nature of early embryonic
development in the Bilateria.
Certain aspects of the early cleavage patterns are determined by the amount and
distribution of yolk, while other features are determined by the genetic programming of
that particular organism. The first two divisions of the zygote have planes running parallel to
the polar axis of the cell and the cleavage leads to 2 then 4 cells (blastomeres). Because this
cleavage is complete (cleavage planes pass completely through the cell, producing
blastomeres that are completely separated from one another by thin membranes), it is
referred to as holoblastic cleavage (Fig 2.8 A, B). Holobastic cleavage occurs in isolecithal
(evenly distributed) and weakly to moderately telocithal eggs ova. In some cases cleavage is
incomplete. This is known as incomplete cleavage or meroblastic cleavage. Meroblastic
cleavage occurs whenever very large amounts of yolk are present (as in strongly telolecithal
eggs). In this type of cleavage, cleavage planes do not pass readily through the dense yolk,
so the blastomeres are not fully separated from one another by cell membranes (Fig 2.8 C).
In holoblastic cleavage, after the second cleavage the amount and distribution of yolk in the
egg determines the nature of further cleavage patterns resulting in two patterns i.e.
complete and equal cleavage and complete but unequal cleavage.
Complete and equal cleavage is characteristic of eggs with relatively small amounts of yolk
that is also evenly distributed. Such eggs are also referred to as homolecithal or isolecithal
eggs. Cleavage in such eggs results in blastomeres above and below the plane of cleavage
being of equal size because of the uniform distribution of yolk. Continued repeated divisions
result in a sphere of small blastomeres, the blastula. In such cases a single layer of
blastomeres constitute the blastula with the fluid filled blastocoel (Fig 2.8 A).
The other type of cleavage, that is, complete but unequal cleavage occurs when there are
moderate amounts of yolk restricted to the vegetal hemisphere (telelecithal eggs). In such
eggs division occurs in such a way that the blastomeres at the animal hemisphere are
relatively smaller than those in the vegetal hemisphere (Figure 2.8 B). These are called
It is important to note, at this point, that the least evolved of the Metazoa, the Porifera (also
called Parazoa= besides the animals) show complete cleavage and the larvae are usually at
the blastula stage of development. In this group, further development occurs well after the
larva has escaped from the parent. The majority of sponges possess a parenchymaula larva,
in which monociliated cells occur on the outer surface, save for the posterior pole (Figure
2.9). This is an example of stereoblastula as it is composed of solid mass of cells. In some
porifera however, the blastula is said to be a coeloblastula. Further larval development will
involve the turning of the larva inside out so that the ciliated cells which were once outside
are on the inside -the typical sponge condition.
Invagination involves cells of the vegetal half of the blastula infolding into the interior
forming a new cavity called an archenteron. This is also sometimes referred to as a primitive
gut. The blastocoel surrounds this new cavity which opens to the outside by an opening
called a blastopore (Fig 2.10).
In the second type of gastrulation, i.e. epiboly, cells of the animal hemisphere of the blastula
overgrow those on the vegetal half. (Figure 2.11). This is a characteristic typical of
protostomes.
Figure 2.11; Gastrulating by epiboly in the zebrafish embryo, Note the enveloping layer
In ingression, cells of the blastula wall multiply and fill the blasocoel (Figure 2.12).
Radial Cleavage.
Radial cleavage occurs in Deuterostomes. In this type of cleavage, cleavage planes are
oriented parallel or at right angles to the polar axis of the egg. The tiers (layers) of
blastomeres arrange themselves radially around the polar axis, and corresponding
blastomeres of different tiers are located directly above and below each other (Figure 2.13).
Spiral cleavage.
This occurs in a group of organisms referred to as protostomes. The cleavage planes are
oriented obliquely to the polar axis of the egg. Successive tiers of blastomeres arrange
themselves radially about the polar axis, but corresponding blastomeres of different tiers
are offset with respect to those above and below. This results in a blastomere in an upper
tier resting in the furrows between two blastomeres in the next lower tier (Figure 2.13).
After gastrulation the radial symmetry is replaced by bilateral symmetry.
Mesoderm formation
The mesoderm has either of two origins: endodermal or from the mesentoblast (Figure
2.14). Its origins from the former is characterised by the evagination of the endodermal wall
into the blastoceol of the gastrula. As the embryo develops the evaginated pouches pinch
off from the endoderm and proliferate in the blastocoel forming mesodermal tissue which
either completely fills the blastocoel or partially filling it (Figure 2.14). Such mesodermal
formation occurs in deuterostomes (excluding the vertebrates). Mesoderm formation from
the mesentoblast involves, first the division of the mesentoblast into teloblast cells which
occupy some ventral-lateral positions in the blastocoel. These in turn will proliferate to give
mesodermal tissue which may or may not entirely fill the blastocoel. This type of mesoderm
formation occurs in Protostomes.
Coelom formation
In animals where the mesoderm is formed from the out pocketing of the endoderm
(deuterostomes), the coelom is a consequence of this process, as the pinched off spherical
mesodermal tissue becomes fluid-filled upon formation (Fig 2.14). This is referred to as
enterocoelous coelom formation and the coelom is sometimes referred to as an enterocoel.
On the other hand, where the mesoderm is derived from the proliferation of the
mesentoblast (protostomes), a slit may occur in it resulting in the formation of a coelomic
cavity. This process is called schizoceoly and the coelom so formed is called a schizocoel
(Figure 2.14). As we have already pointed out, bilaterans bearing a coelom are called
coelomates or eucoelomates. Fig 2.14 below summarises develpmental patterns after
nerve cord becomes knotted with ganglia in each segment from which segmental nerves
enervate segmental viscera and body wall.
The occurrence of segmentation (Figure 2.17) in highly divergent groups like the arthropods
(protostomes) and chordates (deuterostomes) points to the evolution of this feature more
than once in the animal kingdom and serves to illustrate the highly adaptive nature of this
phenomenon.
Figure 2.17: Relationships between the Bilateria, note the occurrence of segmentation in
both protostomes and deuterostomes
Some authors are of the opinion that the cnidarians, bearing a diploblastic organisation and
having no organ at all to show, seem too distant to be capable of giving rise to metazoans
with organs and organ systems. Fossil evidence also disqualifies them on the same grounds
that saw the sponges falling by the wayside. This leaves the triploblastic Platyhelminthes in
the race. These, have ciliated bodies and Willimer (1990) and Barnes et al (1993) favour the
possibility of these worms being the progenitors of the rest of the Metazoa. These, they
argue, because they have bodies covered by cilia, they could probably have arose from a
ciliated protozoan, probably a Cilliophora. They contend that these Cilliophora could have
become colonial, giving rise to a primitive Platyhelminthes of the same ancestry with the
Acoela. Thus if the sponges are ruled out of the line of contenders of higher metazoan
ancestry, then choanoflagellates also fall out as the possible progenitors of the primitive
multicellular animals themselves.
The Acoela, though now significantly diverged from the progenitor, are still close to the
ancestral stalk with their non-permanent synctyial gut and lack of bilateral symmetry and a
loose association of cells. From the ancestral Acoela-like form evolved the other worms (like
the nematodes, Rotifers, kinorhynks etc), the annelid ancestors, the lophophorates and the
deuterostomes. Thus instead of envisioning a phylogenetic tree as has been the tradition,
they see the kinships as akin to a field of grass.
The Coelomates are further divided into Protostomes and Deuterostomes. The Protostomes
(= mouth first) as we have seen are characterized by a mouth which develops from the
blastopore, spiral determinate cleavage, a stereoblastula and hence gastrulation through
epiboly, mesoderm forming from a 4d blastomere and schizocoelic coelom formation. This
group is also further divided into those that undergo moulting (ecdysis), the Ecdysozoa
(Arthropods) and those that do not, the Lophophotracha (Annelida and Mollusca).
So far, our construction of the phylogenetic relationships has been based on morphological
and anatomical features. The use of genetic methods has recently been employed to
analyse the relationships. Small subunit rRNA (SSU rRNA or 18S rRNA) phylogenies generally
have supported the Protostome–Deuterostome (P/D) branch point although they have
suggested reassignment of some taxa from one of these clades to the other, (e.g.,
pogonophorans not shown here) have been reassigned from Deuterostomia to Protostomia
(Valentine, 1997). SSU rRNA data have also confirmed the fact that the Protostomes may
comprise two major branches the Ecdysozoa, including arthropods and the Lophotrochozoa,
including annelids. Aschelminths appear to be a polyphyletic assemblage of Protostomes,
some of which are more closely allied to Ecdysozoa with others allied to the
Lophotrochozoa. Moreover, some molecular data suggest that at least some of the
acoelomate flatworms are lophotrochozoan Protostomes (Valentine, 1997).
The Vertebrata are thus a subphylum in the Phylum Chordata and thus constitute a very
small proportion of the metazoans (4%) (Fig 2.21). As we have already alluded to, the
vertebral column is a firm supporting girdle lying dorsally inside the vertebrate's body. It is
composed by a series of ring-like structures (either bone or cartilage) linked together in a
chain made firm by articulating protuberances anterior and posterior to each unit. Thus,
although the vertebrates are in essence a biological grouping, the invertebrates are a loose
collection of heterogeneous animal forms, embracing the primitive sponges (phylum
Porifera) to the advanced arthropods, echinoderms and the urochordates and
cephalochordates. The latter two groups, like the vertebrates, are also chordates, and, to
differentiate them from Vertebrates, they are called protochordates or Invertebrate
Chordates.
The theory of 'ontogeny recapitulating phylogeny’ as mooted by Haeckel has also had its
fare share of criticism. But here, we insist that these had formed a rational basis for
relationships and the relationships being established today using other criteria like
biochemistry together with cladistics are not resulting in the complete over hall or
rewriting of the kinships, but slight modifications here and there as we have seen in the
sequence analysis of the 18S r RNA which has resulted in very little alteration in the overall
picture in the Protostomes/ deuterostomes dichotomy. As a beginning we thus advocate
for their use, and, as the student gets his/her feet firm in the subject, can then learn the
excerptions. We thus serve to bridge the gap.
Although the great extinction events of the late Permian (250 million years ago) and the
Late Mesozoic (some 150 million years ago) resulted in massive extermination of animal life,
the diversification which were to follow these events, though marked, were not anything
comparable to those of the Cambrian explosion. These two extinction events resulted in the
wiping off of about 90% and 50% of all aquatic and land Families respectively, but the
rebound of life as the remaining species filled in the gaps left out by the victims were not
anything near the Cambrian explosion. The latter was just of great seismic proportions.
Thus, although new families and orders evolved after these extinction events, there was no
evolution at the phylum level. It would thus appear that there have been no new
evolutionary inventions to alter on a grand scale the fortunes of the Metazoa as did
happened in the Cambrian.
Of the 35 phyla of extant metazoans, there are nine major ones, based on their high
representation in terms of both species numbers and populations. These are the Porifera,
Cnidaria, Platyhelminthes, Nematoda, Annelida, Mollusca, Arthropoda, Echinodermata and
Chordata (Table 2.2). These make up 99.2% of all animal species. We will consider these
phyla one after the other, looking at the distinguishing and the phylogenetic trends that
they exhibit. Although kinships linking the primitive multicellular animals with the other
metazoans are still an area of hot controversy, here, for now, we follow tradition and start
with the sponges.
Table 2.2: The major animal phyla and their estimates (extracted from Brusca, 2003)
Phylum Estimated no of species examples
Porifera 5 500 Freshwater sponge
Cnidaria 10 000 Portuguese man of war
Platyhelminthes 20 000 tapeworm
Nematoda 25 000 hookworm
Anellida 16 500 Garden earthworm
Mollusca 93 000 Garden snail (Helix)
Echinodermata 7 000 Sea cucumber
Arthropoda 1 097 631 crab
Chordata 49 693 Tunicate
Total 1 324 324
The Porifera (pore-bearing organisms) are considered the most primitive of all metazoans.
Although multicellular, like all the other metazoans, the cells are not truly specialized into
tissues; they are loose associations of cells. They are thus sometimes referred to as the
Parazoa (meaning beside the animals). In addition to the lack of tissues, they differ from
57 Caston Makaka (in prep)
other metazoans in having no nervous tissues and hence having no coordinated activities.
Unlike other animals also, their principle opening, the osculum is exhalent and not inhalent.
The body of sponges is constructed on a system of water canals that bring water, nutrients
and dissolved gases into the sessile animal. They live a sedentary life, attached onto rock,
cement blocks or pieces of timber
Sponges are largely marine with very few species (about 150) out of the 10 000 described
species being freshwater. They live in the intertidal zones attached to rocks, or any other
had substrata.
The body wall (Figure 19) is composed of three cell layers- the outer pinacoderm, a middle
mesohyl, and inner choanocyte layer lining the atrium. The pinacoderm layer is composed of
flattened cells called pinacocytes. These form an outer sheath of cells perforated at intervals
by the ostia, openings which traverse the whole body wall into the atrium. Each ostium is an
opening through an elongated pinacocyte cell which traverses the whole breath of the body
wall. These cells are thus referred to as porocytes because of the bore or lumen which they
form, presumably as a result of cell invagination. The pinacoderm cells have at their bases
some contractile fibres which they alternatively contract and relax thereby opening or close
the pores in the porocytes.
The mesohyl layer is gelatinous layer containing amoeboid cells and skeletal structures (the
spicules and spongin fibres). As we have already noted the skeletal material occurs in
various shapes and compositions. Amoeboid cells of various types occur in the mesohyl
layer. There are amoeboid archeocytes which are totipotent and thus responsible for
production of other cell types including eggs and sperms. These are large nucleated cells
capable of phagocytic activity and digestion of engulfed food particles. Amoeboid
scleroctyes and spongocytes are responsible for the secretion of the spicule and protein
spongin fibres respectively.
As pointed out earlier, the Asconoid sponges are small in size. They have failed to attain
larger sizes by the restriction which is brought about by a none corresponding increase in
surface area as size increases. This tends to limit sufficient uptake of food material and
gaseous exchange through the choanocyte layer.
Other species of sponges have attained relatively larger sizes by folding the body wall to
varying degrees. This folding of body wall resulted in the extensive increase in surface area
for food and gaseous exchange. The Syconoid body structure, to which we turn now, has
been accompanied by a manifold increase in body size. Some amongst this group have
attained sizes of up to a metre in height and diameter.
In some more specialized Syconoid sponges, pinacocytes proliferate and sort of plug the
incurrent canals leaving smaller dermal pores which lead into subdermal spaces before
connecting to the incurrent canals. Water now flows through the dermal pores into
subdermal pores then into incurrent canals leading into prosopyles, into flagellated
chambers to the atrium through prosopyles, and out through the osculum
Figure 20: A Syconoid sponge, Scypha. Though it isn’t evident from the outside, Scypha has a
Syconoid body plan. (Source: http://www.freethought-forum.com)
Leuconoid structure.
This is thought to be the most evolved in the sponge world. Its efficiency is evidenced by the
occurrence of some of the largest sponges (up to 2metres high and 2metres in breadth). In
these sponges the body wall is extensively folded with the flagellated chambers also
becoming folded (Figure 22). Water now moves in through dermal pores, subdermal spaces,
incurrent canals, prosopyles, flagellated chambers, and out
through apopyles and excurrent channels which finally unite
to form larger channels leading out through the osculum.
Figure 22: Construction of a Leuconoid sponge. Note the
extensive folding which has taken place in these sponges
Sponge classes.
There are 10 000 described species of sponges exhibiting various levels of organisation.
Some exhibit the Asconoid structure only, some the Syconoid and others the Leuconoid
structure and still others have body forms that traverse through all the body forms, passing
from Asconoid to Syconoid to Leuconoid in their life cycles. Sponge structure is thus not a
criterion used in their classification, but as we have already alluded to, nature and chemistry
of skeletal material become quite handy in sponge classification into classes. The 10 000
described species of sponges are grouped into 4 classes: Calcarea, Hexactinellida,
Desmospongia and Sclerospongia.
The Hexactinellida or Hyalospongia are commonly known as the glass sponges from the
appearance of their skeletal spicules. The spicules are hexaxons and often fused to form a
lattice like structure. They are made of siliceous material, hence the glass appearance. Their
bodies are usually cup or vase-shaped and height averages from 10 to 30cm. They lack a
pinacoderm but have an epidermis consisting of a net-like synctium formed by pseudopodia
of amoebocytes that form interconnecting structures. The Syconoid structures dominate in
these sponges and are entirely marine, occurring in deep waters. Figure 24 a and b shows
common deepwater Hexactinellida and Euplectella.
The Desmospongia have a variable skeleton consisting of either siliceous spicules or spongin
fibres or a combination of both. When both siliceous and spongin fibres exist, the spicules
are usually connected to or completely embedded in the spongin fibres. All Desmospongia
are leuconoid and they constitute the largest class with over 90% of all the classes. The
Leuconoid structure allows them to attain very large sizes with some, like the tropical
loggerhead sponges (Spheciospongia) forming masses more than a meter in height and
diameter. Pigment granules present in amoebocytes in many species make this group
frequently brilliantly coloured. They are distributed from great depths to shallow water.
Examples include the common bath sponges (family Spongidae), like Spongia and
Hypospongia.
The Sclerospongia are a small group of sponges with a small number of species found in
grottoes and tunnels associated with coral reefs. They are leuconoid with siliceous spicules
and spongin fibres and an outer encasement of carbonate.
CHAPTER 4
The Cnidaria are typically dimorphic (exhibit two body forms); the
polyp and the medusa (Figures 24 and 25).
Figure 24: The Polyploidy form of cnidarians.
(Sourcehttp://www.mbgnet.net/salt/coral/animals/cnidar.htm)
The polyp is tubular with the oral end up and the aboral end used for sticking on rocks.
Polyps may occur as solitary individuals as in Hydras or colonial like in Obelia. The medusa is
the motile form and umbrella like. It is an inverted version of the polyploidy form, with
tentacles hanging down from the mouth which faces downwards from the medusa. The top
surface is referred to as the exumbrella and the oral surface is called the subumbrella. The
mesoglea in the medusa is often quite massive, giving the whole animal a jelly-like
appearance, hence the term jellyfish which is used to refer to the medusae of some
Some Cnidaria only exhibit the polypoid form and others the medusoid form and still others
pass from one form to another in the life cycles. It is important to note that the two morphs
do not represent alternation of generations as in plants. In fact, the two forms are both
diploid. In forms that alternate between polypoid and medusoid morphs, one form is usually
predominant and the other less conspicuous. For examples in the hydrozoans, Obelia exhibit
both forms, but the polypoid form is the dominant form. In hydra only the Polypoid form
exist.
Figure 26: Section through the body wall of Hydra showing the body layers and associated
structures. (Source: http://cas.bellarmine.edu/tietjen/images/cnidarians.htm)
As already noted, the body wall is composed of two germ layers; the epidermis and an inner
gastrodermis, and in between, a gelatinous mesoglea which is usually cellular (Figure 26).
The epidermis is composed of five major cell types; the epitheliomuscular cells, interstitial
cells, cnidocytes, mucous secreting cells and sensory nerve cells. The epitheliomuscular cells
67 Caston Makaka (in prep)
are columnar cells that line the outside. At their basis are strands of contractile filaments
which contract and relax when the animal is disturbed thereby bringing about bending. In
between these cells are interstitial cells that are totipotent and give rise to either the
epitheliomuscular cells or germinal cells like eggs and sperms.
The third cell types in the epidermal layer are the cnidocytes. These are located throughout
the body wall, interspaced between the epitheliomuscular cells and they are particularly
abundant on the tentacles. They contain organelles capable of eversion (protrusion by
turning inside out) called cnidae. Typically a cnidocyte is an ovoid cell with a basal nucleus
(Figure 27).
B
Figure 27: (A) A cnidocyte containing a nematocyst and (B) A nematocyst being discharged
upon stimulation by pre or predator. (Source:
http://www.tutorvista.com.biology/polymorphism-coelenterata)
68 Caston Makaka (in prep)
One end of the cell interfacing with the environment contains a short bristle-like process
called a cnidocil in hydras (hydrozoans) and jellyfish (scyphozoans). This, in ultrastructure, is
basically a flagellum.
Cnidae include the nematocysts, spirocytes and ptychocytes. The nematocysts (Figure 27)
are stinging organelles that are varied in form. They are used in prey capture and defence.
They are capable of penetration and delivering a toxin. The nematocyst is like a capsule
which contains a coiled, usually pleated tube. The end of the capsule directed to the exterior
is covered with a thread-like flap called an operculum. Stimulation of the cnidocil by a prey
or predator readily elicits the discharge of the nematocyst. This is due to rapid entry of
water into the cnidocyte caused by a change in the permeability of the cell as a result of the
stimulation. The discharged nematocyst is of varying length, consisting of a thread and
equipped with spines at its base. It penetrates the skin of the victim, get anchored by the
spines and discharge the toxins to kill or immobilize its victim.
The spirocyst is an adhesive structure found in some anthozoans. Upon discharge the thread
gelatinizes to form an adhesive net that is used in prey capture. Like the spirocyst, the
ptychocyst is an adhesive structure but is elaborately pleated and devoid of spines. This is
the typical cnidae in some sea anemones.
All the three types of cnidae, once used, like the sting in bees, are discarded. New
cnidocytes can be regenerated from interstitial cells and the developing cnidocyte is called a
cnidoblast.
Some cnidarians are notorious for their very painful stings and, with others; the toxins can
be lethal to animals as large as the size of an adult man. It is quite common to see along
some beaches with warnings such as ‘Beware of sea wasps” a warning which keeps off all
who have experienced the excruciating pain of these stings.
The fourth cell types, the mucous secreting cells are abundant in the basal disc of the sessile
polyps. They secrete mucous for prey capture, protection and adhesion. The last types of
cell, the sensory nerve cells are receptors. They are elongated cells perpendicular to the
epidermal cells. Their bases give rise to neuron processes and their distal ends terminate in
a sphere or sensory bristle. These receptor cells are particularly abundant in the tentacles.
The gastrodermis is also composed of a number of cell types. One type, the nutritive
muscular cells are oriented perpendicularly to the long axis of the body stalk and thus form
a circular layer bordering the gastrovascular cavity. They serve to engulf particulate food
from the gastro vascular cavity for intracellular digestion. Being flagellate, they also help to
continuously stir the contents of the gastrovascular cavity. Enzymatic gland cells are
interspaced between the nutritive muscular cells, where their tipped ends directed towards
the mesoglea are wedged. They are responsible for extracellular digestion by secreting
enzymes into the gastrovascular cavity. The gastrodermis, like the epidermis, also contains
mucous secreting cells, these being particularly abundant in the region around the mouth
where they serve to secrete mucous which aids in lubricating the food and thus facilitate
ease swallowing of prey. Also present in the gastrodermis of some cnidarians like the
cubozoans and scyphozoans are nematocysts.
Feeding is brought about by the activity of the tentacles. Stimulation of cnidocil in the
tentacles results in discharge, entangling and paralysing of prey. The prey is then brought
into the mouth region by the tentacles and the prey is swallowed. Mucous in the mouth
region aids swallowing and once the food is in the gastro vascular cavity, enzymatic gland
cells secrete proteolytic enzymes which initiate the digestion. This results in a soupy broth.
The nutritive muscle cells continuously agitate the contents of the gut by the beating of
their flagella. And also, through their phagocytic activity they take up the particulate food in
the soup broth and digestion continues intracellulary.
In the whole Cnidarian group, there are no specialised organs for gaseous exchange and
nitrogenous waste excretion. These occur throughout the body surface.
Classes of Cnidaria
The cnidarians are divided into 4 classes: Hydrozoa, Scphozoa, Cubozoa and Anthozoa,
mainly on the basis of whether a polyp or medusa is the dominant feature in the life cycle.
The nature of the medusae, in medusoid forms is also used as criteria for classification.
In the Hydrozoans, the polyp (Figure 28). Is the dominant feature and the medusae are less
conspicuous.
The most common hydrazoan is the freshwater Hydra which exhibits the polyploidy form
only. It is a common laboratory animal used on investigations into behaviour patterns in the
Cnidaria. Hydra is a small tubular organism just visible to the eye. Its body consists of a
Obelia, another common hydrazoan, exhibits both the medusoid and polypoid form (Figure
29 and 30). The Polyp, which is colonial basically consist of a vegetative structure built on a
series of highly branched stalks. To the unwary observer it thus appears plant-like. Each
stalk is an individual contributing to the built up of the whole colony. Each stalk is like a tube
within a tube. The outer tube, called the perisarc, is none living and is the product of the
secretion of the inner tube, the coenosarc. It is annulated prior to each branching to allow
for bending as water currents move the different individuals relative to each other. The
coenosarc, which is living, is built on the basic cindarian structure- the diploblastic
condition- common in all cnidarians. Within the coenosarc is the gastrovascular cavity
which is continuous throughout the whole body of the colony. The vegetative body consists
of a horizontal stem or stolon called a hydrorhiza. From the hydrorhiza arise vertical
In the jellyfish (Cubozoa and Scyphozoa) the medusoid form is the dominant morph and the
polypoid forms, being restricted to small larval stage, are very inconspicuous and transient.
They are however distinguished on the bases of the shape of the bell (umbrella or bell-like
medusa), the nature of the bell margin and number of tentacles or tentacle clusters.
Their gonads are gastrodermal like hydromedusae and like hydromedusae release their
gametes into the water. Upon fertilization the zygotes develops into a planura larva that
settles and grow into a small inconspicuous polyp that buds juvenile medusae that will grow
into adults. Examples include Cyanea capillata, Chrysaona, Stomolophus and Chironex
fleckers.
The sea anemones (Figure 33) are solitary polyps that occur throughout the world in coastal
waters. They commonly live attached to rocks, shells and submerged timbers.
The other anthozoan group, the corals live as solitary or colonial forms and secrete hard
external skeletons of calcium carbonate (Figure 34). Each polpy generation builds on the
skeletal remains of the previous generations to 'construct' rocks which will develop into
coral reefs.
CHAPTER 5
Figure 35. Whole mount of planarian Platyhelminthes. Note the two protuberances in the
head region which function as mechanoreceptors.
Their nervous system, unlike the nerve-net present in Cnidarians is slightly more elaborate
with an anterior nerve mass (cerebrum) aggregating in the head region and usually two
ventral nerve cords that run posteriorly (Figure 37). This may be in the form of a ladder like
structure as in the turbellarians due to transverse nerves connecting the two nerve cords.
Free-living forms have also developed some sensory structures in the head region but these
have been lost in parasitic forms. These sensory structures occur as mechanical or light
sensitive structures in the planarians. The free-living forms and some parasitic forms have
primitively developed a true alimentary canal with a mouth and gut but no anus. The gut is
thus said to be blind ending. In these groups with a digestive system, the mouth is
primitively midventral to terminal. In the more derived (advanced parasitic) forms the gut
has completely disappeared.
The body wall is composed of an outer epidermis followed below by basal membrane then
circular and longitudinal muscles. The epidermis may be ciliated or thrown into folds like
microvilli and microtriches, adaptations to either a free-living or parasitic existence. In the
free-living forms the cilia is used as gliding structures in bringing about locomotion and in
the parasitic forms the cilia and microtriches serve to increase surface area for absorption of
food materials from the fluids of their hosts in which they are resident.
There are four classes of Platyhelminthes, the free-living Turbellaria, the Monogenea,
Trematoda, Opisthobothridae and Cestoda.
Turbellaria
The turbellarians are mainly free-living with most of them being aquatic, living in freshwater
and marine environments. Very few are terrestrial, living in very dumb habitats. The
woodlice are one example of a terrestrial turbellarian. The turbellarians vary in size from a
few centimetres to the giant planarians. Their bodies are typically leaf like (Figure 38). Being
free-living they show most of the primitive feature. Anteriorly, in the head region are,
usually tentacle- like structures, the auriles which are sensitive to a variety of stimuli
including light to which they respond by negative taxis when exposed to high intensity light.
The gut
Turbellarians like all other flatworms do not have an entire alimentary canal. At the anterior
end is a mouth which is usually borne at the end of an eversible pharynx. The pharynx leads
into a short oesophagus which bears a muscular bulb which is used in pumping food into the
intestines. The nature of the intestines varies from group to group depending on the size of
the worms. In the very small Acoela there is no permanent gut. The intestine is composed of
a cynctyial mass into which ingested food is digested intracellularlly. In relatively bigger
cutenellids, macrostomids and rhabdocoels the gut is a simple sac. In the triclads the
intestines is triradiate with one anterior and two anterior ceaca and in the polyclads, to
which the popular planarians belong, the gut is thrown into a number of diverticula which in
turn also have diverticula. The result is the complete ramification of the entire space
between the gut and body wall and hence eases distribution of nutrients in these animals
which are devoid of a circulatory system. The pharynx also shows the same trend in
complexity with the simple turbellarians having a simple pharynx and the complex ones
having complex pharynx that can be everted and swallow the pray outside the body cavity.
Excretory system
Excretion is typically through protonephridial tubes. Flame cells with nephridial tubes
terminate in two lateral collecting tubes which run anteriorly (Figure 40) and open to the
exterior in the anterior region.
Reproduction.
Reproduction is typically both sexual and asexual. In many worms, a cut of the worm into
two halves results in the regeneration of the other half, and with many species serial cuts
along the body results in each segment regenerating the missing portions.
Turbellarians are typically hermaphroditic (Figure 41) although cross fertilization is the
norm. Variations do occur in the turbellarians with regards to the nature and disposition of
the sexual organs, but typically, the female reproductive system consists of ovaries
anteriorly located and connected via oviducts to germinal chamber posteriorly from which a
single tube connects to the genital pore ventrally. The genita pore is a common pore and
serves both the female and male system. A copulatory sac connects to the genital chamber.
Viteline glands distributed within the body are connected to the oviducts and provide
nourishment to the developing egg. In other turbellarians there may be numerous pairs of
ovaries, but only a single pair of oviducts. The male reproductive system consists of two
tubes running anteriorly and receiving tubes (Vas deferens) from numerous testes lying in
the parenchymatous tissues. The tubes lead posteriorly before uniting to give a single tube
which terminates in a penis armed with stylets which in turn opens in the common genital
aperture. In some species, instead of a penis a cirrus is present. Sperm transfer is mutual,
the penis of each partner being inserted into the copulatory sac of the other as they abbut
to each other oppositely. Sperm transfer occurs and sperms are stored in the copulatory
sacs from which they will subsequently move and enter the oviducts enroute to the ovaries
where fertilization occurs as soon as the eggs are released.
The Monogenea.
These are mainly parasitic on the external surfaces of aquatic organism like fish, frogs and
reptiles and some have been reported on hippos. Monogeneans, as the name implies, are
typically single host/generation parasites suitably adapted to ectoparasitism through
development of architecturally modified structures to fit into specific host sites.
Like the turbellarians they are flattened and thin (Figure 42). They bear surface attachment
organs in the head region (haptor) and more conspicuous ones in the posterior region called
opisthohaptors. The opisthohaptors are well sculptured structures with anchors (hamuli),
hooks and clamps. The anchors and hooks are elongated keratinized structures that pierce
into host tissue to secure the parasite in place. The clamps help secure the parasites in its
specific host site by clamping onto the skin of the host just like clothespins. All these
structures serve to allow the bearer to cling tenaciously to the outer surface of its host and
thus not lose hold as the host moves against water currents.
Body wall
Like the turbellarian body, the monogenean body wall is covered by epithelia, but unlike
that of the former, it is not ciliated. The epidermis is made of either a layer of cells or a
synctyium which is continuous with cells originating deeper in the parenchyma cells. A basal
lamina follows below, and then a layer of longitudinal and circular muscles respectively.
Reproductive system
The reproductive systems of monogeneans are very similar to that of the Trematoda except
that one or two vaginas may be present. Monogeneans are typically hermaphroditic with
each worm bearing one set of either reproductive system. The female reproductive system
typically consists of a single ovary connected to an ootype by an oviduct. Before the oviduct
reaches the ootype it is joined by three tubes; a vitelline tube from the numerous vitelline
glands, a tube from the seminal receptacle and another from the vagina. From the ootype
which, is surrounded by a Mehli's gland, the uterus continuous anteriorly to the outside
through a common genital opening. The male reproductive organs consist of a pair of testis
(there can be many testis but they are usually two), from which vas efferentia lead to a vas
deferens which in turn lead to a cirrus pouch containing seminal vesicles and prostate
glands. From the cirrus pouch emerge a copulatory organ with spines at its distal end (the
cirrus) which leads to the outside during copulation through the common genital atrium and
pore.
Monogeneans are typically one host parasites, producing eggs that hatch into free
swimming onchomiracidia which attach onto new hosts. The onchomiracida have some
hooks at the posterior which are retained in the adult as the attachment hooks of the
opistohaptor. In some Monogeneans, like the gyrodactyllidae a single larva, viviporously
gives rise to another young one which soon after being produced also gives birth to another
larva which does the same until a host is located and entry is achieved. Mucous produced by
host are thought to elicit a chemotactic response in the onchomiracidium which aids host
location and attachment.
The Trematoda
The male system is composed of two testes whose vas eferentia unite anteriorly to form the
sperm duct (vas deferens). The vas deferens runs towards the anterior and opens into a
pouch, the cirrus sac, equipped with seminal vesicles and prostate glands. From the cirrus
pouch an eversible copulatory organ (cirrus) terminates in the common genital atrium.
The opisthobothrid bodies are covered by a synctyial mass as in the trematodes. Below this
is basal lamina as in the trematodes then circular and longitudinal muscles. They have the
typical platyhelminthes nervous system with, an anterior cerebral ganglion linked to two
ventral nerve cords that run posteriorly with cross commissures at intervals. Excretion is
effected by protonephridia that collect into two lateral collecting tubes that open into a
bladder in the posterior region before opening to the outside through a nephridiopore.
Their reproductive systems are similar to those of the trematodes, but, unlike the
trematodes their life cycles are simple and direct. The eggs, which are voided together with
the host's excreta, hatch to give rise to ciliated larvae called cotylocidium which enters a
new host (if present) to develop into the adult. In those species that are parasitic on
ectothermic vertebrate, the larvae have to be ingested first by a molluscan host which then
passes it to the definitive vertebrate host as it is ingested in turn. The opisthobothrids are
not very specific in their host selection, with some species having been identified in up to
twenty different hosts.
The Eucestoda
This is a group comprising highly evolved internal parasites with two to three or four hosts.
The eucestodes or true tapeworms, with a few exceptions, are internal parasites living, at
one time in their life cycles, in the gut of their vertebrate hosts and their associated tubes.
They have lost most of the features that their free-living and less derived parasitic relatives
possess. They do not possess a gut and all the light sensitive structures associated with their
relatives. They occur as parasites in the gut lumens, blood vessels, the coelom, heamocoel
and internal organs and muscles. The use of multiple hosts (both invertebrate and
vertebrate) and the alteration of host behaviour are some of the hallmarks of parasitic
evolution in this group.
The neck region is short non segmented section of the worm, the posterior end of which
gives off new proglottids by transverse division. The young proglottids of the strobilus are
those close to the neck region and the youngest one abbuts against the neck. The oldest
proglottids are those at the terminus of the strobilus. The strobilus is composed of a series
of proglottids each with a full complement of reproductive organs (both male and female
reproductive systems). The proglottids mature as they traverse to the end in the production
line and the oldest are at the end. Here they release free eggs to the exterior (anapolysis) or
bud off as bags full of eggs (apolysis. These, together with the excreta or faeces of the host,
are passed to the outside.
Body wall
The Eucestoda body is covered by epithelia which is typically a cynctial mass composed of
cells whose roots are embedded in the parenchyma tissues. The outer wall is thrown into
many folds of microvilli called microtriches. These serve to increase the surface area for
nutrient absorption from the host fluids. The synctial mass contains amongst other
organelles, numerous mitochondria. The mitochondria contain very few cristae probably
signifying the heavy reliance on anaerobic respiration (Bush et al., 2003)). These epithelia is
covered by a glycocalyx, which is a carbohydrate rich mucous layer responsible for buffering
the epidermal layer from the host enzymatic activity as well as allowing for absorption of
mineral salts and bile salts. Below the epithelial layer is the basal lamina below which are
circular and then longitudinal muscles. Dorso-ventral and oblique muscles are also present.
The female reproductive system is composed of, usually a single bilocular ovary from which
leads, anteriorly, a short oviduct to an ootype which is surrounded by a Mehli's gland.
Before reaching the ootype the tube receives a tube from the seminal receptacle and
ovivitelline duct. Thus sperm from the seminal receptacle fertilizes the egg enroute to the
ootype. From the ootype, two tubes take root, a blind ending uterus leads anteriorly and a
vagina courses its way laterally or ventrally to the genital atrium and opens to the outside
through the gonopore. A lot of variability occurs with regards to the precise number of
reproductive systems in a single strobila. In some forms there is a single pair, in others there
are two sets of male and female systems, and still in others, there are two sets for the male
and one set of female system. Exchange of sperms can and do occur between two
proglottids of the same individual or between two adjacent individuals, but the later is
naturally favoured. Self fertilization does occur but cross fertilization is thus the norm.
Protandry (maturation of male sex organs before maturation of female organs and
gyndantry (maturation of female sexual organs before male sexual organs) normally guard
against self fertilization.
Nematodes (nemas =threadlike), as their name suggest, are typically threadlike (Figure 50)
with both ends tapering (fusiform) or rounded (filiform). In some, sexual dimorphism is the
norm, with the male being filiform or fusiform and the female, especially when mature
94 Caston Makaka (in prep)
attains some grotesque forms due to high fecundity. These (like Heterodera, Tetramere and
Meloidogyne species) may attain pear shapes (succate) or spherical forms as the inside
become engorged with developing eggs. Characteristic of all these aberrant variations is the
appearance of a constricted neck like region after the head region. Nematode sizes of range
from 0.3mm to 8m long. The largest nematode on record is Placentonema gigantisim
isolated from the placenta of the blue sperm whale.
The body of the nematodes is covered by a cuticle which may be variously ornamented or
sculptured with annular rings. Anteriorly is the mouth which is surrounded by lip-like
structures varying in number between zero and six? In the primitive aquatic forms, the six
lipped condition is quite common and in others there is reduction as a result of fusion or
lose (Figure 51). The anterior is also equipped with sensila, numbering 18 in the primitive
aquatic form. These sensila are in the form of amphids, which are openings into the body,
below which are hidden a glands. These, together with the papilla, cephalic alae and bristle-
like structures serve for chemosensation and mechanoreception. Posteriorly the body
tapers and there is a subterminal anal or cloacal opening. The cloaca (present in males) is
usually provided with a gubernuculum which guide the spicule out of the cloaca during
copulation and a bursa which tenaciously holds onto the females during activities preceding
procreation. In some nematodes (the Phasmida) there is an opening in the terminal region
which opens into a gland below the surface called the phasmida. This is also chemosensory
like the anterior amphids and is of great taxonomic importance at higher ranks of
classification. The anus like the mouth is also surrounded by sensory structures like anal or
cloacal papilla and caudal alae.
Body wall
The nematode body wall is covered, as alluded to earlier, by a cuticle overlying a synctyal
epidermis. The nature of cuticle layers and their numbers vary from group to group, and can
be from two to nine, but basically it is composed of an outer epicuticle followed by a median
zone and finally an inner collagen fibrous layer overlying the synctyial epidermis. The
callogenous fibres are made up of three layers whose fibres are crossed so as to resist any
stretching due to the high hydrostatic pressure inside. Below the body wall are longitudinal
muscle fibres responsible for the adulatory locomotion of nematodes. There are four muscle
bands, two ventro-laterals and two dorso-laterals (Figure 53). The muscles are constructed
in manner unique to the Nematoda, terminating in U-shaped cells which abut with the
epidermis and elongated arms that directly 'enervate' (link to) the nerve chords (Figure 54).
The muscle fibres are arranged in bands inside the body wall to correspond with areas not
accommodating the nerve chords.
Between the body wall and the gut there are no tissues, giving the characteristic
pseudocoelomate condition of the nemas. The pseudocoelom is fluid-filled and contains,
very rarely some coelomocytes, usually not numbering more than four. The fluid in the
pseudocoelom acts as a hydrostatic skeleton as its acts against the muscular activities of the
longitudinal muscles. The gut is single cell layered and its contents are under the high
hydrostatic pressure of the fluid in the pseudocoelom, only the two valves between the
anterior gut and the posterior gut serve to prevent the gut contents from being forced out
anteriorly or posteriorly to the exterior.
Figure
56: Nematode Nervous system and associated structures. (Source: http://sharon-
taxonomy2009-p2.wikispaces.com/file/view/nematode.gif/99304909/nematode.gif)
An anterior nerve ring (ganglion) around the oesophagus (Figure 56) is all that the nematode
has to show for a brain (Bush et al 2001). A number of nerve chords course anteriorly from
the nerve ring to enervate the sensory structures in the head region (the papilla and
amphids). Also from the nerve ring, two major nerve chords (ventrally and dorsally) and two
minor nerve chords (laterally) run to the posterior. In the anal region, another nerve ring,
the anal nerve ring connects the longitudinal nerves and from this ring emerge nerves that
supply the phasmida and the caudal alae and anal papilla (if present).
The excretory system.
The nemas have an excretory system peculiar to them (Figures 56 and 57). It consists of two
rennete cells which are medially situated in an H-shaped system of tubes. Each of the two
arms of the H system runs subepidermally posteriorly and anteriorly along the length of the
worm. The cross of the H system occurs subterminally anterior in the body and a tube
originating meridonially on the cross leads to the outside to release the excreta.
Classification of nematodes.
There are about 1600 to 2000 described nematodes, with up to 1million yet to be described
(Barnes, 1993). These nematodes are classified into two classes depending on whether they
bear or do not bear a phasmida. The two classes are the Secenentea and Adenophorea.
Classification of annelids.
Annelids are classified into three classes, The Polycheata, the Clitella (subclasses
Oligochaeta, Hirudinea and Branchiobdella) and the Aleometamorpha.
Figure 63: Model of Circulatory system of annelids and associated structures (Source:
http://cronodon.com/files/Lumbricus_circulation_POV.gif)
These are the Annelida close to the primitive annelids with typical metameric segmentation
and having a clitellum, a group of segments that secrete mucous used in cocoon moulding.
Subclass Oligochaeta.
These bear most of the primitive structures. They are a characterized by few cheata or few
groups of cheata. Amongst these is Lumbricus terrestris, an extensively studied laboratory
animal which bears many of the features in this group and will be presented here because it
is typical of the group.
L. terrestris is typically terrestrial. Its body is covered by a cuticle which is kept moist (Figure
64) by mucous produced by gland cells in the epidermis. Each segment bears four pairs of
cheata in the lateral and ventro-lateral sides of the worm. Each segment bears
metanephridia which open into the coelom through a nephrostome and to the outside
through a nephridiopore. In the prostomium is a suproesophageal ganglion connected to
the suboesophageal ganglion by circumoesophageal commissures and the typical
ganglinated ventral nerve chord run posteriorly (Figure 62). The dorsal blood vessel which
runs anteriorly gives of branches which run ventrally as semi loops which become swollen in
the pharyngeal area to give rise to lateral hearts (Figure 63). There is an elaborate gut, with
mouth, buccal cavity, oesophagus, crop, gizzard, intestine and anus (Figure 61).
Prior to sperm transfer, which is mutual, two worms pair out and get involved in a complex
presperm transfer behaviour involving massive secretion of mucous with which the pair
smears itself with. The two worms then lay antiparallel with ventral sides abutting against
each other (Figure 65). The copious mucous secreted by the clitellums of each worm hold
the two together. Each of the pair then releases sperms which move externally towards the
seminal receptacle of the other for temporal storage. After sperm transfer the two separate
and each release eggs which move externally to the clitellum region where they are
temporarily stored under the mucous. The mucous, together with the eggs then slides
forwards passing through the spermotheca where the eggs are fertilized before being shed
enclosed in the cocoon which sloughs off the head of the worm (Figure 66). The eggs hatch
to give young ones similar in all aspects to the adults
L. terestries is valued by many farmers who associate its presence with high soil fertility. This
is largely due to its feeding behaviour which involves feeding on the remains of plant
remains together with the soil particles. It does literally eats its way as it burrows into the
soil anteriorly and egests through the other terminus casts of soil. The soil casts which
constitute the faeces of the worm are mainly soil and much of the ingested organic material.
The organic material has however been greatly made more particulate and hence easier
for microbial decomposition. These worms thus make the soil more fertile by partially
degrading plant debris as well as creating burrows which help aerate the soil and thus
favouring microbial proliferation and hence nutrient release to crops.
Subclass Hirudinea
The leeches, as they are commonly called have largely been modified for a parasitic mode of
life, although some are still free-living. They have secondarily lost the internal segmentation
as there are no longer any septa internally. Segmentation is still quite evident as shown by
the segmental ganglia in the ventral nerve chord. The associated segmental nerves and the
segmental vessels of the closed blood circulatory system also betray the typical annelid
metameric segmentation. The surface annulations which occur in this group which may be
misconstrued as evidence of segmentation do not, however, correspond to the internal
segmentation.
Class Polycheata
These are largely marine although there are also many freshwater forms. In marine
environments the numerous species of Polychaetes play a fundamentally important role in
the maintenance of food chains and the whole ecological balance of the seas, thus
supporting the seemingly endless stocks of fish we like to eat.
Polycheates are characterized by bearing the typical biramous parapodia with groups of
chaetae and a head region typically bearing sensory structures (Figure 69). Supporting the
parapodia are proteinecious rods called aciculums. The detailed structure of parapodia
varies from group to group. The polychaetes have secondarily lost internal septa, and
segmentation is still quite evident from the outside. They are commonly grouped into two,
the motile or errant polychaetes and the sedentary ones. The errant polychaetes are in turn
divided into two easily identifiable orders on the basis of the nature of the mouth and
proboscis. The two orders are Phyllidacida and the Eunicida.
The Phyllodocidae (Figure 70) are characterized by a highly agile or eversible proboscis. The
mouth typically borne at the tip of the proboscis bears jaw like structures and teeth like
structures which are used to stab prey and predator. The Eunicida bear a protrusible mouth
bearing a sclerotized jaws, spine like mandibles and maxilla of varying numbers. (Fig?)
Phylum Mollusca
The mollusc are the soft bodied animals thought to have evolved from the flatworm but
underwent wide adaptive radiation to be become the second largest animal phyla after the
Arthropoda. They occur in both terrestrial and aquatic environments. In the aquatic
environment, many are marine and others have moved into freshwater. One group, the
Gastropoda have taken the challenge to make the terrestrial environment their second
home after the marine environment.
Molluscs, as the name implies are soft bodied animals. Because of the very unifying features
or defining features (synapomorphies) occurring in this group we follow the tradition of
described a primitive hypothetical (Archetype or supposed ancestral) mollusc (Figure 72)
with most of the features present and then as we move on to the different groups we look
at the excerptions.
The nervous system is primitively simple with a circumoesophageal ring from which two
pairs of nerve chords run posteriorly as the visceral and pedal nerves, enervating the viscera
and foot respectively. The nervous system as we will see in some molluscs like the
octopuses (Class Cephalopoda) is highly developed and aids learning capabilities.
The gut is entire, with a mouth anteriorly which leads into an oesophagus. The mouth is
provided with a rasping tongue or ribbon-like organ, the radula, which sits on a collagenous
like pedal, the odontophore. The radula (Fig 73) is equipped with chitinous teeth-like
structures arranged in transverse rows which are used to rasp food materials and thus take
them into to the buccal cavity. The odontophore together with the radula can be protruded
through the mouth by protractor muscles. With radula teeth held against the surface to be
rasped, the retractor muscles attached to the odontophore then pull the radula, thereby
scrapping the surface with the hooked teeth tearing off fragments which are swallowed
with the aid of copious mucus. Although mineralized with Ca 2PO4 and Fe3O4, the radula
The Mollusca are one such group which has been able to exploit all the potentialities in the
primitive body plan and this has paid off. To date about a 100 000 species of molluscs have
been described and these are placed into 7 classes, viz Cheatodermomorpha,
Neoniomomorpha, Monoplacophora, Polyplacophora, Gastropoda, Bivalvia and
Cephalopoda.
Class Cheatodermomorpha
These are thought to have retained only a few of the primitive molluscan features. They are
wormlike and have lost the shell, the eyes and tentacles (Fig 76). They live in mud burrows
with heads down, feeding on the organic matter in the soil as they burrow. The anterior
placed mouth is equipped with the radula housed in a radula sac. The foot is greatly
reduced and the mantle cavity open posteriorly usually protruding from the burrow. The
mantle cavity houses the opening to the anus and nephridia and is equipped with a single
pair of bipectinate ctenidia. Lose of shell has been compensated by development of scale-
like structures that cover the vermiform body. Fig ? shows the variety in this relatively very
small group of molluscs.
Class Neoniomomorpha.
These, like the Cheatodermomorpha, have lost most of the primitive molluscan features.
They are vermiform, elongated in the posterior anterior axis, but unlike the former, their
bodies are laterally compressed (Figure 76). They possess a reduced, ridged foot which
usually lay concealed in a ventral groove. The mantle overlies the animal dorsally and
overlaps in the lateral margins, usually concealing the much reduced foot. They have lost
the ctenidia, and in its place, posteriorly is a gill. The mouth opens ventrally anteriorly,
housing the radula inside a radula sac.
Class Monoplacophora.
These have retained the primitive shell overlying the animal in the dorsal position (Fig 78
and 79). The shell is usually conical or cup-shaped with a foot ventrally and a head
anteriorly. Between the mantle margin and the foot that is in the mantle cavity are five to
six pairs bipectinate ctenidia and six pairs of nephridia.
Class Polyplacophora.
These are generally known as the chitons. They have lost the anterior posterior elongation.
They are elongate to oval in shape with the dorsal part covered by 8 overlapping shell plates
(Fig 80). The mantle overlaps at the margins of the plates as a muscular ridge. Ventrally is a
foot and in the mantle cavity are varying numbers of gills ranging from 6 to 88. They are
known for their ability to cling tenaciously to rocks and other hard substrata. This, they
achieve by using their muscular mantle margins as suction cups. If detached from the
substratum, which requires a lot of effort, they quickly roll into a ball like a millipede, until
they secure another surface for attachment. They are known for their grazing habits on
algae attached on rock using their robust radula.
Class Gastropoda.
These is the largest molluscan class with up to 75 000 species of both aquatic and terrestrial
forms. These primitively show the dorsal shell which houses the whole organism although
some have secondarily lost it. Primitively they have a well developed foot, a visceral mass, a
head with eyes and tentacles and a mouth bearing a radula. They are united by exhibiting
torsion at some stage in their development with many retaining it as adults. Torsion is a
phenomenon in which the visceral mass has been turned through 180 o with respect to the
head and foot so that the mantle cavity now opens to the anterior over the head (Fig 81).
Torsion is thought to occur as result of the unequal development of foot retractor muscles.
In the other group of the Heterobranchia (Fig ?) there remerged a tendency towards
reduction, internalization or loss of the shell; a reversal of torsion; loss of the ctenidial
gaseous exchange apparatus and its replacement with a lung or bodily folds and tendency
towards hermaphroditic condition. The first groups to emerge were the marine
Opisthobranchia then the Pulmonates. The Pulmonates (snails and slugs) become terrestrial
although some remained aquatic. These developed a gaseous exchange apparatus for the
terrestrial environment, the lung ((Figure 82). This was achieved by extensive folding of the
wall of the mantle cavity enclosed and with a contractile opening called the pneumostome.
Most of them retained the helical shell although with thinner constituents, but others, the
Symnomorpha completely lost the shell and become the land slugs (Figure 83). Also to
evolve from the Heterobranchia were the Germnomobranchia and the Alligastropoda. The
former retained most of the Opisthobranchia and pulmonate mollusc features and the latter
retained most of the Prosobranchia and Opstobranchia traits.
Class Scaphopoda.
These are the tusk shells (Fig 84), so called because of their elongated shells that resemble a
tusk. The bodies are elongate in the dorso-ventral axis and the visceral mass is completely
enclosed by the mantle which secrets the hollow tusk like shell open at either end. They live
in vertical burrows with their heads and foot downwards feeding off the detritus in the mud
burrows. Protruding downwards is the cylindrical foot which is modified as a burrowing
apparatus together with the head with a mouth anteriorly. The mouth is surrounded by
adhesive rod like clubed feeding structures called captacula. The mouth is equipped with
radula which is used to scrape on the detritus below. The mantle cavity is posterior and into
it drains the egesta and the excreta.
Class Bivalvia.
The Bivalvia include the clams, scallops, mussels, oysters. These are laterally compressed
molluscs with bodies enclosed in a two shell valves at the lateral sides. The shell valves are
connected dorsally by an elastic ligament which tends to make the ventral edges of the
valves open slightly. The animal is enclosed within the valve and is restricted to the dorsal
aspect of the shells leaving a space ventrally and latero-ventral through which the muscular
foot may protrude in the ventral space between the valves. A small head appears anteriorly.
This bears the mouth which is equipped with the radula. The bipectinate gill is replaced by a
monopectinate gill. The elastic dorsal ligaments tend to pull the valves open and these are
countered by the action of a pair of abductor muscles which pull the valves together so that
123 Caston Makaka (in prep)
the whole animal is enclosed. These almost sedentary animals may be attached to the rock
through their shells by byssal threads. Figure 86a and b show the external morphology and
internal anatomy of the bivalvia respectively.
Figure 86a: External morphology (shell, right half) of a freshwater Unionidae bivalve,
Ceolatura kunenensis, collected from Tokwe River, Zimbabwe. Magn x 8. (Photo by CM
Makaka)
Bivalvia classification into subclasses is mainly based on gill structure. There are three
subclasses, two major and a minor one. These are the Protobranchia and Lamellibranchia
and Septibranchia
The Cephalopoda are now only represented by two distantly related subclasses, the
Nautilodea (Nauttilus and Allonautilus) and the Coleoidea (octopuses, squids and cuttlefish).
In the Coleoidea the shell has been internalized or is absent and in the Nautiloidea the
external shell has been retained. The nautiloids have retained the shell which has become
planospiral and composed of a series of chambers (Fig 86). Only the youngest, anterior most
chamber is inhabited by the animal though a thin filament of tissue (siphuncle) runs back
through the other closed chambers. In this group, which is largely sessile, secretion of
chamber occurs anterior most in the planospiral shell and the animal moves into the new
chamber, and closes the one behind by secreting a shell wall. Water enters the mantle
cavity anteriorly and it is pushed out by muscular contraction of mantle cavity resulting in
movement.
Phylum Arthropoda
126 Caston Makaka (in prep)
The arthropods are a loose grouping of metazoans of diverse characteristics unified by a few
shared characteristics. As a group, the arthropods are thought to be polyphyletic. From a
biological view point, they are a very successful group. They form the largest animal group
with over 85% of all animal species and have been around for a very long time. Fossil
records show that by the close of the Cambrian, some 505 million years ago, the arthropods
were already quite a massive group represented everywhere by forms which have changed
very little up to this day. Some authorities estimate that there are over one million extant
species of arthropods with a population estimated at 1018 at any given time. The insects
constitute the largest proportion of these arthropods, with close to a million insect species
and constituting about 80% of all metazoans.
The cuticle is a ridged inelastic covering and thus restricts growth once hardened. It is thus
periodically shed to allow for growth. Prior to shedding (moulting or ecdysis) a new cuticle is
formed just below the older cuticle by the underlying epidermis. The older cuticle, after
much of it has been digested by enzymes secreted by the epidermis and resorbed by the
epidermis, breaks along lines of weaknesses typically starting anteriorly and the arthropod
“craws” as it were, from the old cuticle. The new cuticle, which, soon after the old one has
been shed, is light in colour and still soft and allows for increase in the size of the animal.
This increase in size is achieved by either taking in water or air. Soon the new cuticle
hardens and the pale colour disappears as it becomes melanised.
The process of moulting is quite spectacular as one marvel at the animal literally crawling
out of its old cuticle and the sudden increase in size. It however, makes the animal
vulnerable to predators as the animal is less active. It has been noted that it is during
moulting that mortalities are high in the arthropods. Prior to moulting the animal thus tries
to secure a place where it is less prone to attacks by hiding in secluded places.
Arthropods as a group are also characterized by a metameric body, with each segment
primitively having a pair of appendages. Anteriorly is a legless segment, the acron and
posteriorly the pygidium, and in between a series of segments of variable number. This
construction, together with the structure of the nervous system, as we will note, has been
interpreted to suggest an annelid progenitor to the arthropods exhibiting itself in an
onychophoran-like animal.
Tagmatism is quite extensive in the Arthropoda. This is the organization of body segments
into functional units, such as a sensory and feeding region followed by a locomotory region
and finally a digestive and reproductive region. In many arthropods, these occur as the head
region, the thorax and abdomen, in others there is a head region highly fused to the thorax
to form a cephalothorax and then an abdomen. The anterior head which is made up of a
variable number of anterior segments bears sensory organs like antennae in the
Crustaceans and Uniramia. Housed in the head region is brain which is highly complex using
the standards obtaining in the invertebrate world. The dorsal brain is connected to
suboesophageal ganglia by commissures from where a ventral nerve cord runs posteriorly
with nerve ganglia in each segment issuing out segmental nerves.
The open circulatory system is a typical feature of the arthropods (Fig ?). Blood, more
correctly called heamolymph is pumped anteriorly into an artery usually by a dorsal heart or
The major tracheal tubes are at interval swollen into bulb like sacs which serve as oxygen
stores. The tracheal tubes issue out small branches, which, as the ramify the body, become
smaller and thinner, ending blindly as finger like tubes poking into and between cells
without disrupting their cell membranes. The insect tracheal system thus supply and
remove gases from tissues without the need of an internal fluid transport medium like
blood.
There is variability in organs used for excretion and osmoregulation. In the aquatic
arthropods (Crustacea) it is effected by coelomoducts which terminate in glands opening to
the outside, usually at the base of body appendages like legs and feeding appendages. In
land arthropods it is achieved by blind ending tubes which float in the heamocoel and open
into the hindgut. These tubes, called Malphigian tubules, actively pump mineral salts
together with nitrogenous wastes into their lumens and water follows secondarily from the
heamocoel due to osmosis. The Malphigian tubes empty their contents into the gut from
where water is reabsorbed and the rest are excreted together with faeces through the anus.
The million and odd Arthropods which are also united by their lack of ciliated cells in their
bodies are classified into three extant subphyla, the Chelicerata, Biramia and Uniramia.
Classes of Arthropods
There are five major classes of arthropods and each class can be separated based on shared
characters. These are the Arachnida, Crustacea, Diplopoda, Chilopoda and Insecta. The
Arachnida, together with minor classes like the Merostomata falls under the subphylum
Chelicerata. The Crustacea, Diplopoda, Chilopoda and Insecta are often grouped together as
the Mandibulata because of presence of mandubulate mouthparts. Many authors however
argue that the mandibles in the Crustacea are not homologous with those in the latter three
groups. The latter are also commonly grouped together as the Uniramia on the bases of
their having unbranched appendages unlike in the Crustacean where the appendages are
commonly branched and hence falling into their own subphylum the Biramia.
The Chelicerata stand out as a distinct group from other arthropods by their lack of
antennae and mandible. Their lack of mandibles deprives them of any opposable feeding
structures, as occur in the crustacean and Uniramia. Their carnivorous feeding behaviour is
consequent on the nature of the mouth. They use their chelicerae to pierce or rapture their
prey which they then spoon into the mouth using the pedipalps and other walking legs, or
flood it with digestive enzymes for predigestion to take place before they suck the partially
digested soupy materials with their buccal pumps. The lack of antennae is compensated in
some forms by the modification of the pedipalps into feelers. This lack of antennae is also
reflected in the nature of the brain which is devoid of the third ganglionic mass enervating
the antennae in the other arthropod groups.
Class Merostomata.
This is a small group of about four species all classified into a single order Xiphesura. They
are all marine and characterized by a horseshoe shaped carapace covering the dorsal aspect
of the prosoma (Fig 92). The latter is composed of an acron and six segments. The carapace
is large and overlaps anteriorly so the mouth is ventral. It also overlaps laterally so that the
legs are invisible from above. Conspicuous on the carapace are paired compound eyes. All
the prosomal appendages are pincer like except for the last pair which bears spines which
are used for burrowing into the mud sands which constitute the greater proportion of the
coastal areas which form their home in their benthic mode of life. All the prosomal
appendages originate from the midventral line of the prosoma and the front ones are
radially arranged around the mouth and their bases from part of the oral region
(gnathobases) used in crushing the molluscan shells which form the major diet of these
animals.
The opisthosoma is flat and plate-like and wedges in a notch posteriorly in the horseshoe
shaped anterior carapace. Laterally, it is provided with spines, and quickly constricts to an
anal region from which a post anal caudal spines issues. Also characteristic of this group is
Class Crustacea (crabs, lobsters, shrimp, isopods, water fleas, copepods, etc.)
Primarily aquatic with most species being marine and few terrestrial representatives
Like the arachnids, their bodies are divided into 2 regions (cephalothorax and abdomen). As
alluded to earlier, they bear biramous appendages (forked segmentation). Borne on the
cephalothorax are 2 pairs of antennae, 3 pairs of mouthparts and at least 5 pairs of legs.
Most species are scavengers or predatory.
Subphylum Uniramia
Class Diplopoda (millipedes)
The Diplopoda are primarily herbivorous and all are terrestrial. Their bodies are divided into
two regions; a head and trunk. The head bears one pair of antennae and often a pair of
compound eyes. Each compound eye is composed of a number of facets each functioning as
an individual visual structure so that many images of the some object are formed and send
to the brain where they are fused into a single image. Body segments are usually cylindrical
and each is composed of two fused segments (a condition referred to as
diplosegmentation). Typically two pairs of legs per segment. The reference to this group as
the millipedes (thousand legs) is thus a misnomer as there are no species bearing this
number of legs. The largest species of millipede is the African giant millipede
(Archispirostreptus sp and can attain lengths of up to 22.8cm
The insect body is typically divided into three regions; head, thorax and abdomen (Figure
94). Head with 5 pairs of appendages: a pair of antennae for chemoreception (and in few
species sound perception -mosquitoes) protrude in the anterior dorsal region of the head; a
fused labrum, a pair of mandibles, a pair of maxillae, and a fused labium form the feeding
mouthparts. Many orders have modified mouthparts with some groups having lost or
reduced mouthparts. The insects thus exhibit a numerous feeding strategies.
The thorax bears three pairs of legs and typically, two pairs of wings. Wings are absent in
primitive forms or secondarily lost in the more derived orders. The cerci, a pair of forked
structures at the terminal end of the body is all that the usually large abdomen has to show
for an appendage in the typical insect
CHAPTER 6
Phylum Echinodermata
This is a phylum of marine organism showing radial symmetry in the adult, in particular the
pent radial symmetry. The larval stages, however exhibit bilateral symmetry, and this
feature removes them from any kinships with the cnidarians that also show a radial
symmetry in the adult stage. The name Echinodermata means spiny skin, giving reference to
some of the echinoderms, the Echinoidea with spiny body coverings. The phylum contains
more than 6000 species which include the starfish, brittle stars, sea urchins, sea cucumbers
etc. Typically the mouth is ventral, an internal skeleton of calcium carbonate plates and a
water vascular system consisting of a ring canal, radial canals and tube feet are the major
distinguishing features of this group.
The internal calcareous skeleton is covered by spines and skin and it varies from group to
group and from one species to another. In sea cucumbers the skeleton is made of
degenerated calcareous plates which are buried in the fleshy body, while in starfish the
skeleton is made from movable calcareous plates thus forming flexible joints.
Their water vascular system (Figure 95) is a very vital component because almost all the
functions of these organisms, including locomotion, respiration and feeding, are facilitated
by this system. The water vascular system is basically a hydraulic network of canals - which
runs through the entire body of these marine animals. These animals carry out various life
functions by varying the internal water pressure in this hydraulic network. It is composed of
a ring canal which is connected to radial canals. The latter run within each arm of the
animal. Within the arms the radial canals associate with tube feet that project to the ventral
surface of each arm in depressed grooves (ambulacral areas) and are used to get a purchase
on the substratum as the animal moves. By varying the amount of water in the tube through
regulation in the ampulae the tube feet can be retracted or extended. The ring canal is also
connected to the outside through a stone canal which opens though a pore called a
madreporite, making the contents of the water vascular canals the same as sea water.
These (figures 96) are thought to be most primitive of all echinoderms. They are
characterized by typical pentaradial plan with five arms that are often highly branched so
that as many as 200 arms are not uncommon. Being sessile, their bodies are attached to the
substratum by a stalk of variable length through the aboral surface. The dorsal surface bears
both the mouth and annual openings giving the gut a characteristic U-shape. A porous
calcareous plate, the madreporite, also opens in the dorsal surface. A water vascular ring
canal surrounds the oesophagus and radiate into each arm as umbulacral canals. Paired
rows of tube feet emerge dorsally from each arm along the umbulacral groove. The podia
are thus organs of feeding and not for locomotion as in the other echinoderms. Nerve tissue
surrounds the mouth as the circumoral ring which issue out radiating nerves into the arms.
Below the skin is a calcareous shell made of plates or ossicles.
the whole arm in locomotion. To this end the arms are well equipped with massive ossicles
which occlude much of the arm volume. The ossicles are fused in chains much like the
vertebrae bones of vertebrates and intervertebral muscles serve to bend the arms as they
gain purchase on the substratum and move the animal.
Class Concentricycloidea.
Of all the Echinodermata, these are relatively new to biology as the first specimens well
drenched from ocean bottoms as recent as 1986. These are disc shaped, and unlike all the
other groups, lack arms (Fig?). Ventrally, are two concentric rings of water vascular rings,
and dorsally are a series of covering plates. Two species have been described; one in the
waters of Bahamas and the other of the Coast of New Zealand. The Bahamas type has a
ventral mouth provided with a blind ending stomach and the New Zealand form has no gut
at all.
Class Echinoidea
Figure 9:
Structure of the naked echinoid test of Goniocidaris parasol. (a) Naked test. (b) Test with
radioles. (Source:
http://content.answcdn.com/main/content/img/McGrawHill/Encyclopedia/images/CE21
0900FG0010.gif)
Class Holothuroidea.
These are normally elongate echinoderms (Figure 100), with bodies elongated along the oral
aboral axis and the arms have become incorporated into the body of the animal. The result
is that they lie on their sides, thereby acquiring the equivalence of ventral and dorsal sides.
The ventral has side three umbulacral grooves and dorsally are two umbulacral grooves. A
through gut runs from the mouth anteriorly to the anus posteriorly. The mouth is usually
provided with tentacles which are highly branched or shield like. These serve for filter
feeding and are supported internally by the water vascular system. The gut terminates in as
expanded rectum, cloaca and finally the anus. Opening into the cloaca are tubes connecting
Tube feet scattered throughout the body wall are mainly for locomotion. In some forms
they are used as organs for firm attachment to the substratum and in others they are quite
elongated so that they are used for locomotion, wholly suspending the whole organism
above ground. Body peristaltic contraction aided by the skeletal ossicles that projects from
the body are also used for locomotion in some groups. However in all forms locomotion is
very slow. The skin is leathery and below it is a loosely organized cancerous skeleton of
minute icicles. The skin is provided with circular and five longitudinal muscles. Unlike in
other groups where the madreporite links with the surrounding sea water, in the
holothurians it lies free in the body cavity. The holothurians are gonochoristic and a single
gonopore discharge near the oral tentacles. Development may be direct or indirect. Direct
development occurs in species that brood either in the body cavity or the ovary and indirect
development occurs in those that do not brood.
The class contains 1150 extant species categorized into six orders on the basis of nature of
oral tentacles, tube feet and body shape.
Figure 101: Some Chordates Representatives- Tunicate, fish, reptile, bird and mammalia
(Source: http://tolweb.org/tree/ToLimages/dein.gif)
Chordates (Figure 101), the Phylum to which humans belong, though the most conspicuous
group of animals, constitute a very small proportion (about 5%) of the metazoans. They are
united by their having a number of shared characteristics (Figure 102) some of which are
very transient in some groups. Collectively they have a firm flexible rod running dorsally and
longitudinally inside the animal’s body. This is called a notochord and serves as a supporting
structure at some stage in the life cycle of the animal. It is composed of vacuolated elastic
cells that provide a supporting frame to the animal. This is transient or last the whole life of
the animal. Segmental muscle blocks or myotomes are attached to the notochord and serve
as structures to bring about torques required for locomotion.
A hollow nerve chord runs longitudinally above the notochord. A coelom, ventrally located
in the trunk region houses the heart, excretory, and reproductive organs. The coelom is
restricted to the trunk region of the animal and extends to the head region or tail region. A
series of openings from the gut to the outside occur in the pharyngeal region to allow for
water to be extruded to the outside during feeding. These are called pharyngeal slits or
visceral clefts. In the aquatic chordates they serve to house the gills. In the terminal region
behind the anus, typically, extends a tail of varying length depending on the group.
The chordates are divided into three subphyla, two of these, the Urochordates and
Cephalochordates are referred to as Protochordates or invertebrate chordates on account
of their lacking vertebrae bones and hard skeleton, distinct head, brain and cranium. The
notochord may or may not persist into adulthood and serves for locomotion in their aquatic
environments. They are usually mucofilter feeders with expanded pharyngeal regions for
filter feeding. The third subphylum the Vertebrata to which the fish, amphibians, reptiles,
birds and mammals belong are characterized by a notochord which is quite transient in its
existence; lasting only the embryonic stages, to be soon replaced by hard skeleton in the
form of bone or cartilage as adulthood is attained.
Subphylum Urochordata
The urochordates are free-living, sessile and solitary or colonial invertebrate chordates.
They exhibit the chordate features only in their embryonic forms; in their adult form, they
hardly resemble the chordate body plan. Included here are organism commonly called
tunicates. The notochord, nerve chord and post anal tail only appear in the larval stages (if a
larval stage is present) and disappear altogether in the adult stage excerpt in a few genera.
They secrete a hard outer covering housing the animal inside, called a tunica. This is
composed of either cellulose or protein.
A through, U-shaped gut runs from mouth to anus. The mouth, typically tentaculate leads
into a very wide, highly perforated pharynx, where filter feeding is effected. The mouth is
bordered by a branchial siphon through which water currents are directed into the animal's
body. An artrial siphon channels the water current to the outside, carrying with it the egesta
released from the anus which terminates in the atrium surrounding the pharyngeal area. A
partially closed blood circulatory system serves to move blood in either direction from the
heart which is ventrally situated. A single ganglia, in between the branchial siphon and the
artrial siphon is all there is for the tunicate to show for a brain.
Tunicates are typically hermaphroditic, with a single ovary and testes that open into the
atrium. They bear no excretory system and lack a coelom.
There are about 2 000 tunicates classified into three classes; the Ascidicea, Larvacea and
Thaliacea
In the colonial form two organisms may share the same test or tunica as well as a single
atrial siphon.
Class Thaliacea.
The Thaliacea are either solitary or colonial (Fig 106)). Each animal is elongate and in the
colonial form all the individuals share a single continuous shell and internal canal into which
all the atrial siphons open. All individuals (zooids) thus have their branchial siphons open to
the outside and opposite the atrial siphon which open to the inside releasing their contents
into the communal central tube. Many zooids make up a single colony which appears like a
single large cylindrical organism. No wonder these animals have been mistaken for large
serpents in the marine environment.
Some forms appear as either solitary or aggregate animals (Fig 106). The salutary animal
reproduces asexually and the aggregate form reproduces sexually.
Class Larvacea
This class bears all the typical chordate features; a persistent post anal tail, a notochord and
a dorsal hollow nerve cord and open pharyngeal slits (Fig 107). These animals usually very
small (not more 15mm), has an anterior mouth opening which leads into a pharyngeal
region perforated by slits. It secretes a test or house of chitinous material plus protein into
which it lives and is at liberty to abandon when clogged by detritus or other materials. The
house has a screen through which water and microscopic food particles can enter. A current
driven by the beating of cilia in the pharyngeal area leads the material into the buccal cavity
and into the pharyngeal area where microscopic plankton is trapped and channelled into
the gut. Water from the pharynx is drawn out and passed out through pores in the
pharyngeal area. An escape door, which is usually closed by an operculum-like structure,
allows the animals to escape and inflate another readymade house when it is clogged.
Figure 108: Amphioxus (Top -external), bottom -section through body. (Source:
http;//www.biosci.org/V02/p0149/ijbsV02/p0149g01.jpg
The appendicular skeleton consists of the pectoral and pelvis girdles together with the
associated paired pectoral and pelvis fins and the median fins (dorsal, caudal and ventral
fins) in the aquatic vertebrates. In the land vertebrates (Tetrapods) the paired fins are
replaced by some paired limbs, the fore and hind limbs, both terminating in five fingers or
toes (digits) -the typical pentadactyl limb of land Vertebrates. The median fins have
disappeared completely.
Vertebrates are highly cephalised animals, with a brain situated anteriorly and protected
within the skull and major sensory organs also in the head region. The head bears the eyes,
olfactory and auditory organs. Positioned anteriorly is the mouth, a transverse slit which
opens into the buccal cavity. Primitively there are pharyngeal slits posteriorly placed in the
lateral position in the head towards the trunk region. These are present in aquatic
vertebrates as gill slits but only present in the embryonic forms in the advanced (land)
vertebrate. Connecting the head to the trunk region is usually a constricted region- the
neck.
The trunk bears the coelomic cavity, the reproductive and excretory organs. Ventrally in the
region connecting the trunk to the tail, is the anus. Anterior to this opening are the urinary
and genital openings, sometimes united to form the urinogenital aperture and in some
groups this urinogenital aperture is united posteriorly with the gut to form the cloaca which
opens to the outside as the cloacal aperture.
Extant vertebrates are classified into two super classes; The Pisces and Tetrapods. The
Pisces in turn are grouped into three classes: the Agnatha, the Chondrichthyes and
Actinoptergii. The Tetrapods, which are largely a terrestrial fauna, are grouped into four
classes: Amphibia, Reptilia, Aves and Mammalia.
Class Chondrichthyes.
These are typically cartilaginous fish whose skeletons are basically composed of cartilage, a
relatively hard material composed of mainly fibrous protein called collagen forming a matrix
around collagen secreting cells. Their pharyngeal slits open to the outside as gill slits. The
gills are housed in the pharyngeal area and there are no opercular covers. This group
includes the sharks, rays and skates. The Sharks, the most conspicuous group of the
Chondrichthyes are characterized by rasp bodies covered by cosmoid scales of similar
composition to mammalian teeth. They lack paired fins and the caudal fin is heterocercal,
i.e. the upper and lower lobes are asymmetrical. They maintain buoyancy by continual
swimming because they lack swim bladders. If they stop swimming they sink. Most of them
are active swimmers and predatory, being provided with robust teeth to crush the hard
shell of molluscs which constitute their major diet. The skates are bottom dwellers.
Class Oesteichthyes
These are bone fishes that populate both the marine and fresh water environments. They
typically possess a bony skeleton. Bearing paired fins, a stream-lined body and a homocercal
caudal fin, they are active swimmers with high manoeuvrability. Their gill openings are
typically covered with a bony operculum which, in addition to the buccal pump serves to
Class Amphibia.
The amphibians are believed to be the earliest land tetrapods, being descendent from the
Coelacanths through the genus Rhipidistia. Amphibians as a group are not quite
independent of water. Their soft bodies and shell-less eggs are prone to desiccation in the
terrestrial environment. They thus go back to water for reproduction; laying their eggs in
water or very dump places and relying on water and water films for sperm transfer to eggs.
Fertilization is thus external and prone to the vagaries of the outside environment. Many of
us have seen, first hand, the vast numbers of eggs laid by the common garden frog Rana
temporaria in pools or stagnant water, all in the vain attempt to maximize survival rates.
Apart from having lungs for respiration, many amphibians are also dependent on cutineous
respiration. To this end, the skin is highly vascularised and is kept moist by secretions from
epidermal glands which serve to dissolve atmospheric oxygen. Secretion from these
epidermal glands, in some cases act as deterrent secretions with offensive odours against
predators. The dependency of the amphibians on water has also meant that they had to
retain some of the apparati for gaseous exchange in water. Thus most amphibian larvae are
hatched with gills which will later degenerate during metamorphoses as adult stage is
attained. In some cases the gills are even retained even in the adult form. A good example is
the Mexican salamander, Axolotl.
Amphibians have significantly improved circulatory system over that of Pisces. The heart is
typically three chambered, there being a second auricle in addition to the single one in
fishes. Oxygenated blood thus goes back to the heart for pumping before being released
into the systemic circulation. Like fishes, amphibians are ectothermic.
Amphibians used to constitute a very large group of vertebrates but their diversity is
currently highly demished, and, to date a viral epidemic is on the rampage in the amphibian
world, threatening to wipe out many species of amphibians, especially the frogs and toads.
Extant amphibians are grouped into three major Orders; the wormlike caecilians or Apoda,
the tailed Salamanders (Urodela) and the Frogs and toads (Anura) (Fig? To?).
Class Reptilia
These are generally creeping animals from which they get their name (repitilios- to creep).
Their vertebrae column has a single point of articulation to the head (occipital condyle). The
lower jaw characteristically bears many bones. The teeth are rarely differentiated
To further increase the rigidity of the landing device, the femur is linked proximally to a rigid
structure, the synsacrum, which is composed of central sacrum linked anteriorly to the
lumbar and a few thoracic vertebrae, and posteriorly too few caudal vertebrae all fused to
form a rigid girdle.
The birds mouth is modified into a horny structure (the rhombotheca) bearing no teeth. The
nature of bird’s beak is very often species specific and forms a very important taxonomic
feature. The beak comes in various forms; short and pointed as in the weavers like the
quelia, long and spear like in the hammer kops, long and spoon shaped as in the spoonbills,
short and hooked like in the Aquidae (the eagles) etc. The loss of teeth has been
compensated by the evolution of the gizzard in the place of the stomach which takes over
Class Mammalia.
Mammals are the present day dominant vertebrate group on land. They are typically
terrestrial although some groups have secondarily gone back to water. As a group,
mammals are unified by a number of characteristics: possession of mammary glands from
which they suckle their young; presence of hairs or furs, anucleate red blood cells;
endothermic metabolism; presence of diaphragm separating the thoracic cavity from the
The diaphragm, separating the thoracic cavity from the abdominal cavity is functionally an
important structure for efficient gaseous exchange. It aids in the ventilation mechanism,
and, together with the efficient four chambered double pump heart, make oxygen supply to
body tissues very efficient- no wonder mammals are amongst the most active group of
animals. The endothermic nature of mammals arises from their ability to efficiently produce
enough energy for bodily requirements as well as for keeping the body warm and hence
constant regardless of fluctuations in ambient temperatures. This, as we have seen in birds,
allow them to be independent of temperature changes in the external environment and
hence enable them to inhabit wide ranging habitats. The presence of hair serves to enhance
this endothermic nature. By keeping warmed air close to the body the hairs or furs help to
keep the internal body temperature constant.
Extant mammals are grouped into three subclasses, the Prototheria (Monotremes),
Metatheria (Marsupials) and Eutheria (Placentals) (Figure? to?). The Monotremes are
thought to be the most primitive mammalian forms and are believed to be the closest to the
reptilian mammalian ancestors. These, like reptiles, they lay eggs and their legs are covered
with scales. Upon hatching the young ones suck milk oozing from mammary glands below
the skin in between hairs on the mother's belly. Although they suckle their young like all the
other mammals they lack nipples or teats and do not have external ears. Adult monotremes
lack teeth which are only present in the young ones. In the adult the teeth are replaced by a
horny beaklike structure. They lack a vagina but insteady possess a cloaca. Their testicles are
abdominal and not suspended in scrotum outide the body like in the other mammalian
CHAPTER 7
The arthropods are the largest group of animals constituting about 80% of all animals. The
majority of these animals are the insects (comprising about 70% of all animals). The other
arthropods (Crustacea, Chelicerates, Chilopoda, Diplopoda, Symphyla and Pauropoda) put
together constituting only 7%. Insects are thus as Dhaliwal (1999) puts it -the lords of this
planet. They are found in every conceivable habitat; marine water, freshwater, brackish and
the terrestrial environment; under varying environmental conditions, in the ice of the Arctic
and Antarctica, in the hot and cold deserts of the Kalahari and Siberia and even in hot
springs (Dhaliwal 1999); occurring as either free-living and grading from imperceptible to
perceptible levels of parasitism; subsisting on nearly anything organic- algae, fungi animal
and detritus and even hydrocarbon in oil spills. Their food acquisition methods are
unparalleled; there being true hunters and parasites, browsers and grazers, suspension and
deposit feeders and still others utilizing chemoautotrophic and photosynthetic symbionts.
Many are solitary and still many others are quite organized and live in colonies exhibiting
varying levels of division of labour and specialization, reaching its zenith in the bees where
some members, for the wellbeing of the whole colony, have sacrificed their reproductive
capabilities. They have evolved to be amongst the best of architects; burrowing and building
galleries to consistent geometric specification and orientations. Amongst them are some of
the most proficient foragers and hunters that leave man green with envy. Still others have
ventured into agriculture and slave making, areas hitherto thought to be a preserve for
mankind. In fact insects learnt the ropes of these trades well before men evolved.
The highly cryptic nature and camouflage exhibited by some members of this group like the
praying mantis, the stick insects and melanic moths have no doubt served as great lessons
for mankind during times of war but he has not mimicked them to any level comparable
with the models (the insects themselves).
In this chapter we start by considering insect evolutionary history then move on to look at
the features that make insects a success story then wind up by giving a survey of the major
insect orders.
The search for an arthropod ancestor, just like the search for the ancestor of any other
animal group, centres on opening up archives of more primitive animal forms, bearing some
similarities, which sometimes, though less developed or primitive would most probably
have formed a basis or frame for modification to give rise to the descendent whose ancestry
is being sought. This search has led biologist to zero down the progenitor of the arthropod
to an annelid like ancestor, most probably related to present day Onychophorans. Insects,
apart from having features that are annelid-like and hence can be traced directly to the
latter also possess characteristics which are not present in the annelid but present in the
Onychophorans. The Onychophorans on the other hand, apart from resembling arthropods
also have some features common with annelid and not present in the arthropods. This has
been taken to be suggestive of an intermediate group linking the two.
Apart from having features common in both annelids and arthropods and thus serving as a
probable link between the two the onychophorans also have features peculiar to
themselves which warrant them being placed in a separate class. Snodgrass (1952) has thus
envisioned a classification which ties the three groups as phyla in the super phylum
Annulata (Romoser 1973). By the Cambrian each group was firmly fixed and it is thus
possible that they all emerged in the Precambrian.
That the progenitor of these three groups is an annelid or annelid-like ancestor is now
widely accepted, and the polycheate annelids, being the oldest of the annelids have been
touted as the most probable ancestors or the closest to the real ancestor (Romoser, 1973).
Opinion differs on the exact transition from the annelid-like ancestors to the arthropods.
Whilst Meglisth (1967) envisioned a direct evolution from polycheate to arthropods
Snodgrass (1982) and Sharov (1966) are of the opinion that from an ancestral wormlike
organism evolved two lines; one that gave rise to the annelid polycheate and the other one
giving rise to a lobopod, the latter subsequently branching to give the Onychophorans and
arthropod groups. (Romoser 1973) (Fig. 2.3)
Figure 23? Schematic representation of the proposed evolutionary tree of the Arthropoda
The establishment of the arthropod line then saw the branching to give three groups which
are often given subphylum status; the Trilobita (trilobites), Chelicerata (chelicerates) and the
Mandibulata (mandibulates). The trilobites, having had their heydays in much of the
Palaeozoic failed to witness the end of this era, they become extinct in the Devonian period
and are known to us only through their fossil remains. The chelicerates as we have seen in a
previous chapter are still extant and are represented today by the horseshoe crabs,
scorpions, spiders, ticks and mites. The Mandibulata are divided into a number of classes:
the Insecta or Hexapoda (beetles, butterflies, bees, locust, bugs, flies etc) the Crustacea
(crabs, shrimps, barnacles, copepods, and sow bugs) and the Myriapoda which is a
composite group composed of four classes; the Chilopoda (centipedes), the Diplopoda
(millipedes), the Symphyla (symphylans), the Pauropoda (pauropopds).
The kinships between the three subphyla is clouded in controversy with some investigators
envisioning a monophyletic origins and others a diphyletic one but it is clear that by the
Cambrian all three groups had established themselves quite well as shown by the fair
representation of each group in the rock strata dating to this age. Fossil evidence is also
conclusive on the fact that the Tribilobita are the oldest of the three groups.
Menton (1973) is of the view that these groups are polyphyletic. Thus the Mandibulata
(Crustacea, Chilopoda, Diplopoda, Symphyla, Pauropoda and Insecta) are a polyphyletic
group. She envisaged the development of the mandibles in Crustacea as being totally
Insect origins
Now we narrow down to our target group, the insects. After the branching of the Trilobita,
the next to branch off were the Crustacea in the Silurian period leaving the Mryiapoda and
insect line (Sharov 1966, cited in Romser 1973). During the Devonian the Insecta branched
off, evolving from a Myriapoda or protomyriapoda-like progenitor. Menton is of the view
that the protomyriapoda from which the insects evolved from was more like a Symphylan as
evidenced by the similarities in the symphylan head appendages and mouthparts. This
landmark transition is thought to have involved the loss of locomotory organs from the rest
of elongate body and their retention in the region just distal to the head region. This region,
the thorax thus became a specialized area for locomotion, which as we will see shortly, also
developed wings.
The first insects to emerge in the Devonian were apterous (wingless). Today they are
represented by the Thysanura which are soft bodied. From these primitive insects some
insect groups were to develop which were better able to stand to the challenges of the
terrestrial environment. Thus we see in the Lower Carboniferous the evolution of insects
that were better able to cope with the ferocious predators (amphibians) that have just
emerged from the water onto land. These insects evolved wings. This allowed them to
evade the predatory amphibians and the reptiles that later evolved from the amphibians
during this time. These insects populated the terrestrial environment with very little
challenge from competitors and predators. The wing was however primitive in that although
capable of efficient flight could not be folded over the body when the insect was at rest
because of the lack of a wing flexion mechanism. The bearers of this primitive wing
(Paleopterous insects as they are called) thus could not fully utilize refuge provided by
microhabitats away from predators. The paleopterous insects had their heydays in the
Carboniferous and Permian and today are represented by the dragonflies (Odonata) and
mayflies (Ephemeroptera).
The Upper Carboniferous saw the emergence of insects with the ability to flex their wings
(Neopterous insects). The evolution of the wing flexion meant that they could fold their
wing over their abdomens when at rest. This had unprecedendent effects on the bearers.
These insects had the dual advantage of being capable of flight to escape predators and at
the same time occupy microhabitats like crevicies to evade the same when at rest. They
became the dominant insect group and have maintained this pole position to this day,
constituting 97% of all insects and 90% of the insect orders (Romoser (1973). The Neoptera
include all present day insects serve for the Apterygota and Paleoptera.
The last major or milestone achievement in the evolution of insects was the evolution of
metamorphoses in the neopterous insects in the Upper Carboniferous. Metamorphoses
involve a gradual change in body form from larval form to adulthood. This can be simple or
complex. In the simple or incomplete form, also referred to as hemimetabolous
metamorphosis, the young insect is a small wingless replica of the adult which develops into
the winged adult over a period of time, growing in spurts during periods of moulting or
ecdysis. Complete metamorphosis involves the development of a young one which is totally
Extant insect are categorised into as many as 29 orders basing on relationships between
them. We will come back to look at some of the characteristic of the major insect orders but
for now let us make a detour and look at the some of the characteristics that make insects
the champions in the metazoan world.
Organisms owe their success to inherent characteristics (inherited traits which thus can be
passed from parent to offspring) that confer a survival advantages on the bearers. This
means that the bearer/s can survive to attain reproductive age, reproduce offspring that will
in turn pass on the button stick as they in turn reproduce. We are thus carriers of the 'good'
genes that we should pass onto to the next generation! With the environment constantly
changing (as it has always been the case) it follows that the larger the repertoire of
advantageous traits the better off are the bearers; many of the traits offering survival
advantages under contemporary conditions and still many others to serve for any
eventualities. The latter constitute preadaptions. The present day adaptions, the
preadaptations and the novel adaptations which may crop up in the gene pool due to
mutations all serve to ensure that the bearer's survival is not limited to the present , but
also to the future so that the group continues to survive and diversify today and in future (in
the next epochs, eras and eons).
The aspect we have just alluded to brings us to the second dimension to success in
biological entities. This is survival of group through time, and, here we talk of deep time,
time into the past and into the future. This, as it were, has largely been availed through the
Ever since these early times insects have occupied the habitats they occupy today serve for
the terrestrial environment. But even though, they were the first to occupy the terrestrial
environment, with the result that when the land vertebrates moved onto land in the
Carboniferous times, some 280 million years ago, they were ‘surprised’ to find out that the
new territory already had inhibitors in the form of insects populating the soil in burrows,
climbing and hoping from grass to grass, tree to tree and still others, in the air, flying. If
these second invaders were not surprised, then, part of the reason for their moving onto
the land was in pursuit of the insects as food items. The insects provided abundant food for
the first vertebrate invaders, the amphibians and later the reptiles that evolved from them
in the late Carboniferous to Permian. To deny the insects their top position, even on this
criterion alone, would be unjust to one group immensely favoured by nature; but denial
may not surprise me because the judge (humankind) is an interested part in the contest and
his strong bias is pervasive: consider this fact: dinosaurs roamed the earth in their diversity
for close to 200million years, but mankind, who has only been around for less than a million
years and is already under threat of climate change caused by his carelessness, want to
judge the dinosaurs as being one group 'least adapted' to cope up with the troubles of this
world.
We have already alluded to the cosmopolitan nature of insects in our opening remarks in
this chapter. Yes insects inhabit every conceivable habitat in the earth's biosphere. This
brings us to the third dimension on our measure of success- extent of geographical
distribution. It is only the widest variety of antics that can guarantee the bearer to survive in
any game in the repertoire of demanding games for survival in the different environments.
Except in the marine environments, insects are not found wanting in this aspect and they
have their representatives in the very cold of the cold environments, the very hot of the
hottest deserts. By geographical extent, insects occupy undoubtedly the most extensive of
territories and this makes them once again the most successful group of animals. Perhaps it
is because of their cosmopolitan nature that every human culture practices entomophagy!
As you pose to reflect on what you are reading about and gaze into the air and the
surroundings, perhaps the first animal that comes into your sight is an insect of some sort.
This brings us to our fourth dimension of biological success- large population numbers. We
have already noted that insects are the most speciose of not only animals but the whole
living world. In addition, insects are also good contenders for the pole position for
champions in the animal world in terms of population numbers. If the unicellular animals
are disregarded and only the metazoans are considered, then no doubt insects come out
tops. Many of us have seen, as we take a casual walk in the home garden, a single vegetable
leaf being home to several hundreds aphids, not to mention the thousands of ants that visit
our homes on foraging engagements, the hundreds of thousands of elate termites that
decorate the urban tower lights at dusk after rains in early summer and the tens of millions
Using all the four criteria commonly used to measure biological success; species diversity,
survival through geological time, extent of geographical distribution and population
numbers, insects come up tops on all aspects. They are indeed the undoubted land lords
and man should simply learn to coexist with them - a fact long known by the entomologists
and crop protectionists after the dismal failure of chemical control measures during the
insecticide boom of the 1940s to 60s.
Throughout their extensive evolutionary history insects have acquired many distinctive
structural, developmental, physiological and behavioural attributes, well perfected, which
have and still enable them to remain the dominant group.
Waterproof exoskeleton
In a previous chapter we mentioned that the Cambrian boom was characterised by the
evolution of novel characteristics which resulted in the complete change of the fortunes of
the bearers. The evolution of a wax covered chitinous waterproof exoskeleton was one such
evolutionary invention that changed the fortunes of the insects (and the arthropods as a
whole) on a scale that was never to be repeated again in the evolution of this group. It was
a milestone evolutionary invention because the bearers could move onto the desiccating
terrestrial environment. What else would this group want? Because they were now
immune to desiccation which otherwise would have rendered the whole exercise futile
because of their small size, they could now occupy the land environment feeding on the
numerous plant food available. The Bryophytes and Pteridophytes had already occupied the
vast terrestrial environments. With abundant food, many opportunities opened up; with
fewer predators on land, the insects multiplied to populate all the terrestrial habitats and
niches hitherto vacant. They populated, as we have already noted, most favourable and
even the least of favourable environments.
Apart from waterproofing, the insect exoskeleton also serves a variety of purposes. It is light
for easy movement both on land and in air. It is of great strength for muscle attachment and
for protection against predators and acts as the first line of defence against pathogens
(viruses, mycoplasmas, bacteria, and protozoa). It is vital in the water relations of aquatic
insect by curbing excessive loss of salts from the body. It has been modified into a tool for
digging (as in the sclerotized claws of burrowing insects), for preying (as in the spined
forelegs of mantids for example) and oviposition (as in the ovipositor of many insects).
Above all it maintains the shape of the insect.
Physiological adaptations.
Many insects exhibit some developmental arrests in their life cycles. During this period of
developmental arrest the insect is inactive and no development takes place. This is called
diapause and often serves to overcome adverse condition like very cold periods or periods
of inadequate food. Diapause can occur at any stage in the development of an insect; it can
be in the egg, larvae or adult stage and is elicited by environmental cues such as long day
length which may act as an indicator to the pending adverse conditions. When it occurs in
the adult the adult insect suspends all adult behaviours like courtship and mating.
Insects, being mainly terrestrial have also evolved ways to limit water loss. Insects are
uricotellic implying that they excrete uric acid, a relatively non-toxic nitrogenous waste
which can be flushed out of the insect body with minimal amounts of water. This thus
serves to conserve water in the body as minimum amounts of water are lost from the body.
The Pteryogota are primitively winged insects although some have secondarily lost the
winged condition. They are subdivided into two super orders; Exopterygota and
Endopterygota, depending on the nature of early development. The Exopterygota are
characterised by wings which develop externally and the Endopterygota by wings which
develop internally from imaginal buds. Both groups exhibit some form of metamorphoses.
The Exopterygota exhibit incomplete metamorphoses, with the wingless young one (nymph)
resembling the adult into which it develops. Because they exhibit incomplete
metamorphoses they are said to be hemimetabolous and they constitute the Hemimetabola
group. They are divided into the Paleoptera and Neoptera orders. The Endopterygota
exhibit complete metamorphosis in which the young (larva) is completely different form the
References
BARNES, R.S.K. (et al) (1993). The invertebrates: a new synthesis. Publisher: Oxford:
Blackwell, 1
Brusca RC and Brusca GJ (2003). Invertebrates. 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates Inc. Publisher,
Saunderland, Massachusetts
Galas, F. and Sinervo B. (2002). Divergence and Convergence in early embryonic stages of
Metazoans. Contributions to Zoology, 71 (1/3)
Bush, Albert (et al) (2001). Parasitism: the diversity and ecology of animal parasites.
Publisher: Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press,
Bush et al (2003)
Gilbert, SF, Raunio, AM. (1997). Embryology. Constructing the organism. Sinauer Associates,
Sunderland, MA.
Moore, Janet (2003). An Introduction to the Invertebrates
Romoser, W.S. (1973). The Science of entomology. New Kork: Macmillan Publishing.
Wilson, EO (2001). The diversity of life. London, Penguin
Valentine, J. W. (1997). Cleavage patterns and the topology of the metazoan tree of life.
Proc Natl Acad: 94(15): 8001–8005.
RANA, S.V.S (2003). .Essentials of Ecology and Environmental Science. New Delhi : Prentice
- Hall,