Terre, a member of the Philippine Bar with “grossly immoral conduct,” consisting of
contracting a second marriage and living with another woman other than complainant, while
his prior marriage with complainant remained subsisting No judicial action having been
initiated or any judicial declaration obtained as to the nullity of such prior marriage of
respondent with complainant. Respondent was charged with abandonment of minor and
bigamy by complainant. Dorothy Terre was then married to a certain Merlito Bercenillo her
first cousin, with this fact, Atty. Jordan Terre succesfully convinced complainant that her
marriage was void ab initio and they are free to contract marriage. In their marriage
license, despite her objection, he wrote “single” as her status. After getting the
complainant pregnant, Atty. Terre abandoned them and subsequently contracted another
marriage to Helina Malicdem believing again that her previous marriage was also void ab
initio.
marriage
HELD: Yes. The Court considers this claim on the part of respondent Jordan Terre as a
spurious defense. In the first place, respondent has not rebutted complainant’s evidence
as to the basic fact which underscores that bad faith of respondent Terre. In the second
place, the pretended defense is the same argument by which he inveigled complainant into
believing that her prior marriage or Merlito A. Bercenilla being incestuous and void ab
initio (Dorothy and Merlito being allegedly first cousins to each other), she was free to
contract a second marriage with the respondent. Respondent Jordan Terre, being a lawyer,
knew or should have known that such an argument ran counter to the prevailing case law of
the supreme Court which holds that for purposes of determining whether a person is
legally free to contract a second marriage , a judicial declaration that the first marriage