3. Expert opinions
4. Impact Evaluation
5. Best practices
3
1.
Concept and
current situation
1.
5
1.
Classification of cloud
IaaS Hybrid
PROVISION of infrastructure as a
service
cloud
USE of mixed infrastructure
Enabler Provider
HW + SW
Actors Broker
Auditor involved
Final customer
Source: ONTSI 7
1.
i mprovement in
technological
management and security
h igh level of
standardization and
technological integration
p ositive impacts on
sustainability (green IT) and on
t
s
echnological amortization
ervice availability
the economy 8
1.
Interesting facts:
01.
According to IDC, global revenue
from cloud services will reach 55,500 02.
million dollars in 2014, with growth
rates of nearly 30%. By 2014 the
market share will have reached "A study published by Gartner
nearly 12%, positioning itself as the identifies Spain as being amongst
main driver in the industry the thirty leading locations to host
externalized services. The main
Source: “Worldwide and Regional Public IT Cloud Services 2010-2014 assets of Spain highlighted by
Forecast”, IDC Gartner are: reduced costs,
knowledge of other languages than
03. Spanish, good IT and transport
infrastructure and a strong link with
"Cloud computing saves costs and Latin America"
facilitates SMEs’ access to
computing, making it possible for Source: “Cloud Computing”, Bankinter Innovation Foundation
them to compete at the same
technological level as large
organizations"
Source: “Cloud Computing”, Bankinter Innovation Foundation
9
2.
Survey of SMEs
in Spain
2.
20.5%
HAVE a perfect knowledge of
cloud computing
24.7%
KNOW some examples or have
heard of some examples
54.9%
DO NOT KNOW cloud
computing solutions
"This figure is obtained as a result of adding up the total percentage of companies that
have a sound knowledge of cloud computing and those that can mention some Based on: Total number of companies (0 to 249), Source: ONTSI 11
examples. with websites
2.
27,2%
60.1%
algunos ejemplos, of micro-enterprises do not have any knowledge
o hablar de ellos
of cloud solutions 24,2%
28,9%
No los conozco Compared to micro-
60,1%
43,9%
43.9%
enterprises, SMEs have
Sí, los conozco deeper knowledge of
perfectamente
HAVE perfect knowledge
15,7%
15.7% cloud, 28.2 percentage
point higher.
27.2%
27,2%
algunos ejemplos,
o hablar de ellos
24,2%
24.2%
DO KNOW
some examples
28.9%
28,9%
No los conozco
60,1%
60.1%
43,9%
Sí, los conozco
DO perfectamente
NOT KNOW From 10 to 249
From 0 to 915,7% Based on: Total number of companies , with Source: ONTSI 12
websites
2.
0.9%
There is a high level of 21.7%
satisfaction with cloud
technology
Never used it
77.5%
Based on: Total number of companies (0 to 249), with websites Source: ONTSI 13
2.
77.5%
77.4%
20.1%
22.2%
2.5%
0.4%
From 10 to 249
From 0 to 9
14
Based on: Total number of companies (0 to 249) with websites that have
Source: ONTSI
some knowledge of cloud
2.
76.1% 50.6%
USE of some solution
USE of some solution 18.8%
USE of some solution
Environments controlled by
the organization
Private Cloud
Focused on niches:
59.9%
Community
Cloud
education
1.7%
health care…
13.9% 33.8%
Often in larger Higher levels of
Hybrid Cloud
companies Public Cloud elasticity and
scalability
Based on: Total number of companies using cloud, with Source: ONTSI 16
websites
2.
34.7% 18.2%
47.4% 11.7%
8.9% 8.2%
66.5%
Greater flexibility and scalability of 52.3%
technology management resources
Based on: Total number of companies using cloud, with Source: ONTSI 18
websites
2.
The main benefits perceived have to do with time and
costs
PERCEIVED BENEFITS DERIVED FROM USE OF CLOUD COMPUTING APPLICATIONS OR SYSTEMS IN THE COMPANY
70.6%
TIME saving
29.6 % 28 %
16.4%
4.6%
63.4 %
COST saving REDEFINITION PRODUCTS ORGANIZATION OTHER
of internal and services of internal staff
management
48.5%
IMPROVEMENT of productivity in
general
Based on: Total number of companies using cloud, with Source: ONTSI 19
websites
55,0% 2.
Ahorro en tiempo
More than half of the micro-enterprises consider 76,2%
productivity improvement as a benefit 55,0%
Ahorro en tiempo
PERCEIVED *
BENEFITS DERIVED FROM USE OF CLOUD COMPUTING APPLICATIONS OR SYSTEMS IN THE COMPANY, BY COMPANY
SIZE
76,2% Time saving is
55,0%
55.0% perceived above all in
Ahorro en tiempo small enterprises
64,0% 76,2%
76.2%
Ahorro en costes
TIME saving
63,2%
64,0%
Companies with 10 to
64.0%
Ahorro en costes
249 employees
63.2%
63,2%
perceive slightly
64,0%
higher cost savings
COST saving
Ahorro en costes
42,2%
42.2% 63,2%
de productividad
general
50.7%
50,7%
*Three first benefits mentioned
IMPROVEMENT on productivity 42,2%
From 10 to 249
de productividad Based on: Total number of companies using cloud, with Source: ONTSI 20
in general From 0 to 9
general websites
2.
1.0% 4.3%
0.6%
25.9% are generally very
17.9% 25.9% satisfied with the provider
and/or providers
Quite satisfied Not satisfied at all *It includes responses from companies that have declared being very or quite satisfied
**It includes responses from companies that have declared being very or quite satisfied
Based on: Total number of companies using cloud, with Source: ONTSI 22
websites
2.
SECURITY AND
LOSS OF
CONFIDENTIALITY
CONTROL OF PROCESSES
Source: ONTSI
Doubts about integrity Doubts about availability Dependence on provider Loss of control of processes Security and confidentiality
23
2.
30.5%
Budget restrictions
14.2%
Cost factor
Based on: Total number of companies using cloud, that are aware of its existence but do not use it
Source: ONTSI 24
2.
Interesting facts:
02.
01. Lack of sufficient knowledge
about the technical and
Enterprises using cloud economical benefits of this new
technological model along with the
computing declare that the
performance level of providers is costs arising from initial
optimal recruitment largely explain the
high percentage of SMEs that do
not use cloud computing
03. 04.
16.1% of SMEs that are aware 63.4% of enterprises using cloud
of the existence of the would recommend the use of the
technology but do not use it technology without any
have expressed their intention of reservation to enterprises with
using it in the future similar characteristics
Source: ONTSI 25
2.
Scope
• The scope of the investigation includes micro-enterprises (0 to 9 employees) and SMEs (10
to 249 employees) with websites of some type located in the whole national territory.
Sample size
• To compile the information, an online survey methodology has been applied, through a
Web ad-hoc application and after previous telephone contact.
Margin of error
• Margin of error for the 1,700 surveys is ± 2.37% under most unfavorable statistic
conditions (p=q=0.5), with 95% degree of confidence.
Perceived barriers:
o lack of common legal framework
o loss of control and dependence
by clients
o deep ignorance in the market about what it
is and the advantages it offers
o the development of SaaS services is
very dependant on the capacity
of telecommunication networks
Source: ONTSI 28
3.
Perceived advantages:
o cost model without infrastructure
amortization
o it facilitates immediate launch of projects.
o it facilitates focused and business
oriented ICT
o it facilitates access to new services
Perceived barriers:
o growing dependency on the provider
o privacy and legal requirement problems
o possibility of losing control over
the technology, but above all, over the
corporate processes
Source: ONTSI 29
3.
Perceived advantages:
o cost savings
o avoiding duplication
Many public entities are
currently carrying out a o development of teleworking
previous phase of reflection o shared services consolidation
and prospect. Perceived barriers:
o integration and interoperability problems
o uncertainty about performance
o "locked-in" effect with providers
Source: ONTSI 30
4.
Impact
Evaluation
4.
Total return of
Public
Treasury 678
million euro
Source: Obtained from the Economic Impact Model developed by 32
*Methodology based on macroeconomic input-output tables. Deloitte
4.
90%
+
Small deployments
≈ 100 users
60-90%
Average
Community deployments
Hybrid Cloud
Cloud ≈ 1,000 users
30-60%
Large deployments
≈ 10,000 users
33
Source: Accenture
4.
Office universalization.
Mobile access.
Virtual storage
Storaged data in remote servers.
Observatory Website:
www.ontsi.red.es
Observatory e-mail:
observatorio@red.es
Follow us
http://twitter.com/#!/ONTSI
All rights reserved. This publication may be copied and distributed on any medium, provided its authors are given due
recognition. This publication cannot be modified or used for commercial purposes.