net/publication/265005203
DiabCare 2008: Survey on Glycaemic Control and the Status of Diabetes Care and
Complications Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in the Philippines
CITATIONS READS
7 1,014
3 authors, including:
Cecilia Jimeno
University of the Philippines Manila
68 PUBLICATIONS 260 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Cecilia Jimeno on 18 November 2015.
Abstract
Introduction: DiabCare 2008 study was conducted to 42.5% of patients had LDL levels >2.6 mmol/L; 14.3% had
understand the current status of diabetes care in the triglycerides >2.2 mmol/L; 19.2% had HDL<1 mmol/L and
Philippines. It is the continuation of the similar studies 53.9% of the patients were on lipid lowering agents.
conducted in 1998 and 2003. It is expected to shed 68.4% patients were hypertensive and 64.4% were
some light on the changes in status of diabetes care receiving anti-hypertensive medication. Microvascular,
over the past decade in the Philippines. macrovascular and severe late complications were
reported in 68.1%, 14.8% and 9.4% patients respectively.
Methodology: A total of 770 diabetic patients were The rates of diabetic complications were cataract
recruited from general hospitals, diabetes clinics and 32.7%, neuropathy symptoms 45.2%, microalbuminuria
referral clinics, out of which 724 were type 2 diabetic 15.8%, history of angina pectoris 10.7% and cerebral
patients. The following information were collected stroke 4.7%. Two thirds of the non-insulin users were
during direct patient interview and review of medical worried about starting insulin therapy.
records: demographic data (date of birth/age, sex,
educational status, marital status, ethnicity, etc), Conclusion: The results are suggestive of inadequate
medical history (duration of diabetes and concomitant control of blood glucose among Filipino patients with
diseases), risk factors, clinical examination reports, self- type 2 diabetes mellitus, with a significant proportion
monitoring data, diabetes education, complications, of the sample having associated complications and
eye and foot examinations, diabetes management co-morbidities. This warrants immediate attention as
and HbA1C measurement. Quality of life, adjustment diabetes control and complications status has not
to illness, and compliance to medications and health improved over the past decade.
maintaining behaviors were also evaluated using
structured questionnaires. Keywords: DiabCare, Diabetic complications, Glycaemic
control, Hypertension, Dyslipidaemia
Results: The mean HbA1c was 8.03 ± 1.96 % and only
15.0% of the patients achieved ADA target of <7%.
complications and quality of life, along with other of the centralized measurements.
psychosocial aspects. The relationship between the
physicians’ perception and their current practices for Statistical Plan:
diabetes management was also evaluated. A sample size of 1988 patients was calculated
based on the least prevalent complication i.e.
M ethodology cardiovascular disease (CVD) among diabetes patients,
to provide adequate probability of capturing even
DiabCare Philippines 2008 survey was conducted the lowest occurring complication. Windows based
between December 2008 and May 2009 across 40 software (PEPI, version 4) by PM Gahlinger and JH
centers in the Philippines. Consecutive patients were Abhramson, 1993-2001, with 5% level of significance
enrolled by the individual physicians involved in the and 20 to 30 % margin of error was utilized for the
study. About 40 doctors participated in this study above calculation. The data set for analysis of various
which were mainly primary physicians, diabetologists parameters had been confined to age (18- 85 years),
and endocrinologists practicing across the Philippines. BMI (18-40 Kg/m2), HbA1c (4-16%), FPG - 54-306 mg/
Investigators from each center selected patients dl (3-17 mmol/), PPG - 54-500 mg/dl (3-27.77mmol/l)
from their clinical records or databases. Patients for and the duration of diabetes up to 25 years.
inclusion were required to have received treatment for Both the primary and secondary end points were
diabetes in a particular centre for the last 1 year, analyzed through descriptive statistics. The former
and were also required to visit the clinic at least were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD),
once during last 3-6 months apart from the initial visit. range or percentages while the latter as number
Patients were enrolled after evaluation of inclusion/ and percentage. ANCOVA and logistic regression
exclusion criteria. methods were applied to analyse the influence of
The study details were explained to the eligible predictor variable on change in outcome variables
patients who were then asked to sign the informed for continuous and discrete variables respectively. All
consent form upon expressing their willingness to tests were two-sided and a p- value of less than 0.05
participate in the study. The study did not necessitate was considered significant.
any specific visit and the data was collected during Novo Nordisk was responsible for CRF collection,
the patient’s routine visit to clinic. transportation of blood samples to central laboratory
for HbA1c estimation, data management, quality control
Data Collection and HbA1c Assessment: and statistical analysis.
The following information were collected during
direct patient interview and review of medical records: Outcome measures:
demographic data (date of birth/age, sex, educational The primary outcome for this study was the
status, marital status, ethnicity, etc), medical history status of glycemic control of Type 2 diabetic patients
(duration of diabetes and concomitant diseases), risk as measured by the mean and standard deviation
factors, clinical examination reports, self-monitoring of the HbA1c, as well as the proportion of study
data, diabetes education, complications, eye and participants who are within the target goals for good
foot examinations, diabetes management and HbA1C glycemic control. Generally, the glycemic target is
measurement. Laboratory assessment was performed either a value less than or equal to 7.0% or in some
only for HbA1c, whereas for all other investigations, guidelines, a more stringent target of < 6.5%. The
the most recent data from patient’s medical records mean HbA1c was compared against this benchmark;
was captured. A standardized Case Report Form (CRF) as well, patients were classified as being in control
was used for recording data. or uncontrolled, upon comparing their study HbA1c
In addition, patients were interviewed to evaluate with these targets and the proportion of patients who
quality of life using a questionnaire adapted from the had good glycemic control was calculated.
WHO-5 Well Being Index 11 and the DAWN (Diabetes
Aspirations Wishes and Needs) survey which consisted R esults
of Ps y ch o s o c i a l q ue s t i onna i r e , a nd C om p l i a n c e
questionnaire. In WHO-5 well-being questionnaire, A total of 770 patients were initially enrolled in the
responses (All or most of the time) are considered as study, but only 724 ( 94% of the patients) were type 2
Positive and responses (Some of the time or not at all) diabetic patients and included in the present analysis
are considered negative and responses are measured (data of other diabetic patients are excluded from
as positive responses (%) and negative responses (%). the analysis). The response rate was more than 85% in
Blood samples for HbA1c measurement were majority of the study variables. However, the response
collected from venous/capillary blood (as per National rate was lower for HbA1c by records (76.8%), HbA1c
Glycosylated Standardisation Programme (NGSP) by survey (45.7%), triglyceride value (74.9%), cholesterol
guidelines) by the participating clinics. The samples value (78.2%), nephropathy evaluation (76.2%) and eye
were stored at 20C to 80C for testing purposes and complications (photocoagulation assessment – 64.9%,
discarded immediately after analysis. Bio-Rad HPLC D cataract assessment- 66.9%, advanced eye disease
10 or Variant 2 method was used for the estimation assessment- 63.9%, legal blindness assessment- 0%).
of HbA1c. Bio-Rad was also responsible for the lab HbA1c by records are the results which have been
selection, supervision as well as the quality assurance done in the course of their regular follow ups, while
Table I. Demographic and metabolic characteristics of Study Participants, Table II. Distribution of Participants according to Achievement of Glycaemic
N=724, 2008. targets According to Various Guidelines, N=724, 2008.
DEMOGRAPHIC AND METABOLIC DATA VARI- ADA GUIDE- EU GUIDELINES IDF/ AACE
CHARACTERISTICS ABLES LINES GUIDELINES
Age (years)* 61.56 ± 11.30 Target N (%) Target N (%) Target N (%)
Gender, male/female 222/ 488 (30.7/67.4%) HbA1c <7 109 ≤6.5 66 (9.1) <6.5 77
(%) (15.0) (10.6)
BMI (kg/m2)* 25.72 ± 4.0
≥7 223 > 6.5 266 (36.7) ≥ 6.5 255
BMI groups:
(30.8) (35.2)
≥23 / ≥25 kg/m2 74 / 52.1%
≤ 7.22 337 ≤6 185(25.5)
Duration of diabetes (years)* 9.0 ± 6.0
(46.5)
Waist circumference: (%)
>6-<7 134 (18.5) < 6.1 187
Male (≥90 cm) / Female (≥80 cm) 54.4 / 72.4 %
(25.8)
FPG
Duration of diabetes groups: (%)
(mmol/
≤1 / 1-5 / >5-10 / >10 years 4.28 / 27.9 / 28.7 / 34.0 %
dL)
> 7.22 210
Age at onset (years)* 52.20 ± 11.27
(29.0)
Educational status
≥7 228 (31.5) ≥ 6.1 360
LCTRW# 13 (1.8%) (49.7)
5 years 87 (12.0%) Main cohort, n=724. ADA, American Diabetes Association; EU, European Diabetes
Policy Group; IDF, International Diabetes Federation; AACE, American Association of
10 years 231 (32.0%) Clinical Endocrinologists
recommended targets. Table 5 gives a comparison was seen in the screening numbers for albumin over
of HbA1C target achievers for the years 1998 and the past decade. Screening numbers for albumin in
2008 as per various guidelines showing that proportion 1998 and 2008 were 13% vs. 45.6%. 9 As compared
of patients achieving glycaemic control targets has to 2003 there is a rise in the proportion of patients
not improved over these last 10 years. However this with serum creatinine values > 2mg/dl (7.3% vs 6%).
should be considered cautiously in the light of missing Also the proportion of patients with macroalbuminuria
HbA1c data for majority (54.3%) of the present study has grown two fold since 1998 (2% vs 1%) though
population. Data shows that only 15% patients in this the absolute number of patients is small. Proportion
2008 survey achieved the ADA HbA1c target, though of patients presenting with neuropathy symptoms has
three fold more patients achieved FPG target (46%). remained similar over the past decade; 42% in 1998,
One of the potential explanation for this could be the 53.6% in 2003 and 45.7% in 2008. More patients had
inadequate PPG control. Unfortunately PPG values were undergone foot examination in the present study
available only for less than one fourth of the present in comparison to 2003 (81.9% vs. 64 %). Overall
study population. Results thus suggest more emphasis there is considerable improvement in the screening
on frequent monitoring of PPG and its control either patients for diabetic complications though it is still not
with dietary modifications, OADs, short acting insulin optimal. In future efforts should be directed towards
or premix insulin. Further, mean HbA1c in DiabCare further improvement in screening rates in addition to
Malaysia 2008 was 8.7% whereas that of Singapore educating patients and care givers about appropriate
was 7.8%. 12 management of complications.
Age at onset and duration of diabetes emerged
Table V: Percentage of patients achieving glycemic targets in DiabCare as significant predictor variables for all selected
1998 and 2008 complications except for macrovascular complications
GUIDELINE TARGETS 1998 2008 for which duration was significant. However, other
variables could also predict selected complications as
HbA1c (%)
shown by the unadjusted odds ratio (Table VI and
ADA < 7% 16.0 15.0 VII). Hypertension was a significant predictor variable
EU < 6.5% 7.0 9.1 for all complications except for serum creatinine. Thus
AP ≤ 7.5% 16.0 23.2 earlier treatment of diabetes and good control of
hypertension emerge as important factors in preventing
ADA, American Diabetes Association; EU, European Diabetes Policy Group; AP, Asia-
Pacific Type 2 Diabetes Policy Group or controlling complications.
In the DiabCare 2008 study, the mean LDL, HDL Table VI: Odds for diabetes-related complications in type 2 diabetes
and triglycerides levels were 2.91± 1.19, 1.38 ±2.62 and mellitus
1.81±2.87 mmol/l respectively. The mean LDL, HDL and Inde- Cataract Serum Neurologi- Macrovas-
triglycerides levels were 3.05± 1.16, 1.48±0.77 and 1.36 pendent Creatinine cal Symp- cular Com-
±0.87 mmol/l in PAD-SEARCH study 2007. 8 Difference Variable >2mg/dl toms plications
could be because of the preferential inclusion of Age 0.93(0.90- 0.95 (0.91- 1.03 (1.01- 1.02 (1.00-
patients with dyslipidemia to for PAD-SEARCH study. 0.96)* 0.99)* 1.05) * 1.04)*
A rise in the proportion of patients receiving anti- Sex 2.23(1.39- 1.48 (0.63- 1.35 (0.94 0.72 (0.47-
hyperlipidemic drug is seen in 2008 as compared to 3.57)* 3.45) -1.94) 1.12)
2003 (53.9% vs. 34.4%).10 However it needs to be further Age at 1.04 (1.02- 0.97 (0.93- 1.00 (0.99- 0.99 (0.98-
improved as only half of the population received onset 1.06)* 1.01) 1.01) 1.01)
treatment for diabetic dyslipidaemia. The increasing use Duration 1.08 (1.05- 0.98 (0.92- 1.09 (1.06- 1.08 (1.04-
of anti-hyperlipidemic drug could be the reason for 1.12)* 1.05) 1.12)* 1.11)*
decrease in the proportion of patients with TG > 2.2 Hyperten- 2.45 (1.51- 0.65 (0.21- 1.63 (1.12- 2.34 (1.38-
mmol/l when compared to 2003 (27.3% vs. 19.2%).10 The sion 3.96)* 1.99) 2.37)* 3.96)*
percentage of patients with hypertension in DiabCare On insulin 0.83 (0.56- 3.79 (1.85- 1.62 (1.16- 2.14 (1.41-
2008 study was 68.4% and 64.4% of patients were 1.24) 7.72)* 2.25)* 3.27)*
on hypertensive medications. Similar to the findings
HbA1c 1.27 (0.78- 0.46 (0.12- 0.48 (0.31- 0.59 (0.34-
regarding the therapy of dyslipidemia, the increase in 2.07) 1.75) 0.74)* 1.03)
the number of individuals being treated for hypertension
FPG 0.50 (0.24- 0.29(0.05- 0.18 (0.07- 0.22 (0.06-
is a positive sign that physicians are trying to improve 1.03) 1.53) 0.41)* 0.69)*
the care of diabetic patients. However, given that
SMBG 1.27(0.86- 2.10 (1.10- 1.61 (1.17- 2.14 (1.40-
both dyslipidemia and hypertension are major risk 1.88) 3.99) * 2.23) * 3.25)*
factors for cardiovascular disease, treatment of these
Data presented as odds (95% confidence interval); *p<0.05; FPG, Fasting Plasma
two problems needs to be improved. Glucose; SMBG, Self monitoring of blood glucose
Compared to the data in 2003, an increase was Odds for binomial data: Odds for “sex” expressed as male vs female; odds for “hyper-
tension” expressed as the reciprocal of subjects with SBP ≥140 mmHg or DBP ≥90
noted in the number of patients undergoing eye mmHg or use hypertensive medication vs. non-hypertensive subjects; odds for “SMBG”
examination in the present study (61.7% vs. 52%). 10 expressed as subjects doing SMBG vs. subjects not doing SMBG; odds for “On insulin”
expressed as subjects with insulin therapy vs. subjects without insulin therapy. Age,
This indicates a positive change as it may help to Duration of diabetes, HbA1c, FPG and onset age were continuous variables
detect cataract and retinal changes at an early stage Macrovascular complications: Patients with any or all of the below mentioned complica-
tions - Angina pectoris, MI, CABG/Angioplasty/Stents, Stroke
in patients with diabetes. A notable improvement
Table VII: Odds for diabetes-related complications in type 2 perceived a healthy state of well-being. Adherence
diabetes mellitus, Age at onset and diabetes duration being the to treatment questionnaire indicated an acceptable
risk factors status. However close to two thirds of the non-insulin
Independent Cataract Serum Neurological Macrovascular users were still worried about starting insulin therapy.
Variable Creatinine Symptoms Complications This calls for increasing efforts and resources towards
>2mg/dl educating patients and care givers to overcome the
Age at onset 1.08 1.04 (1.00- 1.01 (1.00- 1.01 (0.99-1.03) barriers to insulin therapy.
(1.06- 1.07)* 1.03)*
1.11)*
C onclusion
Duration 1.15 1.09 (1.03- 1.10 (1.07- 1.08 (1.04-
(1.10- 1.16)* 1.13)* 1.12)*
1.20)* DiabCare 2008 along with similar data from previous
*p<0.05. Data presented as odds (95% confidence interval). The model used to obtain
studies conducted over the last 10 years suggest a
the odds adjusts for poor status of glycaemic control among Filipino type
onset age and duration of diabetes. Macrovascular complications: Patients with any
or all of the below mentioned complications - Angina pectoris, MI, CABG/Angioplasty/
2 diabetic patients. A small proportion of patients
Stents, Stroke achieving target HbA1c despite close to half the study
population achieving FPG target emphasizes the need
The proportion of patients on OAD and insulin in for improvement in monitoring and adequate control
2003 and 2008 are given in the Table VIII. The use of PPG. Increasing obesity prevalence suggests the
of biguanides has increased since 2003 study (73.6% need for the implementation of sustained patient
vs.56 %) while use of sulphonylurea was slightly education measures on the importance of weight
reduced (56.4 % vs. 60%).10 Increased use of metformin control and the tools available for the same. Why
is line with the global recommendations supporting the majority of patients are not receiving treatment
its use. Marginal reduction in sulphonylurea use could for diabetic dyslipidemia is a cause for concern and
be due to the introduction of DPP-4 inhibitors used requires training the treating physicians on lipid targets
by close to 10% of the present study population. and optimal use of anti-hyperlipidemic agents. There
There is a considerable increase in the proportion of is considerable improvement in the screening rates for
patients using insulin (42% in 2008) in comparison to diabetes complications though it is still inadequate.
2003 (24.1%). In the current study mean daily dose Efforts on increased screening should be continued and
of insulin has also increased in comparison to 2003 treating physicians should be trained on management
study (41.28 U/day vs. 26.1 U/day). Close to half of complications. Increased use of insulin, newer insulin
of the patients on insulin were using newer insulin analogues and pen devices is a positive trend though
analogues and similar proportion of patients were using two thirds of the non-insulin users are still worried about
insulin pen devices. This shows growing awareness, starting insulin. There is an urgent need to educate
acceptance and confidence on insulin therapy among patients and prescribers to address the barriers to this
patients and prescribers. important tool in diabetes management. In summary,
the status of diabetes care in the Philippines appears
Table VIII: Proportion of patients on lifestyle modification and below the accepted standards and DiabCare 2008
therapy calls for urgent measures to improve the delivery of
quality care among the patients with Type 2 diabetes
VARIABLES 2008 2003
mellitus.
Smokers 11.8 15.4
Alcohol 8.8 14.3 Acknowledgements:
OAD 78.5 71.3 The authors would like to thank Novo Nordisk
South East Asia Oceania regional office for generously
Insulin 42 11.5
providing grant for this study and to all the expert
Regular self-mon- 46.2 16.1 panel members, investigators and staff of the various
itoring
hospitals for their support. Novo Nordisk South East
OAD, oral antidiabetic drug
Asia Oceania regional office was responsible for the
appropriate tabulation, presentation of data for this
Compared to the 2003 DiabCare study, a manuscript.
considerable improvement was noted in the proportion
of patients self-monitoring their blood glucose levels i.e. References
16.1% in 2003 and 46.5% in 2008 respectively. Studies
have shown that SMBG in addition to the standard 1. Soria MLB, R, Sy RG, Vega BS et al. The incidence
therapy assist in improving the glycaemic control of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Philippines: A 9-year
though it does not contribute much when practiced cohort study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2009; 86:130-133.
alone.13 2. Dans AL, Morales DD, Velandria F et al. National Nutrition
As per the WHO-5 well-being index and the DAWN and Health Survey (NNHeS): atherosclerosis-related diseases
QoL questionnaire about half the study population and risk factors. Phil J Intern Med 2005; 43:103–15.