Submitted by:

STUDENT
TAN ANDREA D.
NAME:
Last name Given name Middle initial

STUDENT
20180174087
NUMBER:

QUESTION
ACTUAL QUESTION SOLUTION AND FINAL ANSWER
NUMBER
•Ho = 60 Ha ≠ 60
• ∞ = 0.01
The average typing speed of a good typist is said • tabular value : 2.575
to be 60 words per minute. In a certain company,
45 applicants were given a typing test and the • Computed value of z
results showed a mean of 55 words per minute (55−60)√45
=
10
1
with a standard deviation of 10 minutes. Based = - 3.35
on these results, can we say that the typing
speed of the 45 applicants is below the average? • Decision : Reject Ho, Accept Ha because the z score of – 3.35 is
Use ⍺=.01. within the rejection area
• Conclusion : I therefore conclude that the 2 critical values (cutoff
points) are -2.575 and 2.575. Since -3.35is outside of this interval we
reject the null hypothesis and accept alternative hypothesis.

In a certain college, the average NCEE score Sample 1 Sample 2

of the first 50 engineering freshmen students 82 78
is 82 with a variance of 64. The first 45 BA x̅
freshmen students have a mean NCEE score σ² 64 49
of 78 with a variance of 49. Based on these n 50 45
2 information, can we say that the difference is
the value of the mean of the two groups can • Ho: x̅ ̅ 1= x̅2
be attributed to chance? Use 1% level of Ha : x1 ≠ x2
significance. • ∞ = 0.01
• tabular value : 2.575
•Computed value :
 82−78
64 49
= 2.60
√ +
50 45
• Decision : Reject Ho, Accept Ha
• Conclusion : I therefore conclude that the difference between the mean
scores is significant and can’t be attributed to chance.

Sample 1 Sample 2
82.45 80.67
x̅
σ² 49.9 56.78
n 32 32
A researcher is trying to determine whether a new • Ho: 82.45 = 80.67
teaching technique is superior to the old teaching Ha: 82.45 ≠ 80.67
3 technique . two groups of students with 32 members
• ∞ = 0.01
each were taken for 3 months and the result are shown
below. • Computed value of z
82.45−80.67
= 49.9 56.78 = 0.97
√ + 32
32
• 2.575 > 0.97

• Conclusion : I therefore conclude that the computed value is less than

tabular value so we Accept Ho and Reject Ha.
X Y
4.5 4.9
x̅
σ² 0.31 0.20
σ 0.56 0.345
A car battery dealer is trying to determine which of the n 40 40
two brands of car battery he is selling has longer life
4
span. He conducted an investigation by interviewing his
customer and was able to get the following result. • Observed difference : -0.4

• Standard deviation of difference :

0.56^2 0.45^2
=√ +𝑙 = 0.1136
40 40
• DF : 89

• 95% confidence interval for the difference

(-0.6257, -0.1743)

• T-test = -3.5211

• Population 1 ≠ Population 2: P-Value = 0.0006

Population 1 < Population 2: P-Value = 0.9997
Population 1 > Population 2: P-Value = 0.0003
• Ho = 4.5 yrs = 4.9 yrs .56 = 0.31
Ha = 4.5 yrs ≠ 4.9 yrs .45 = 0.20
•∞ = 0.01
• Tabular value = -2.575.

• Z-Value = -0.83

4.5−4.9
Z=
0.31 0.20
√ + 40
40
= - 3.54

• The computed value of z = -3.54 is less than the critical value -2.575.
Hence it reject the null hypothesis
• Conclusion : There is a significant difference between the two means
 A. Scatter Diagram

The following data show the total cost of production of

commodity z with the corresponding output over a
period of 10 years.

a. Draw a scatter diagram b. Estimate the regression equation: y= a + bx

b. Estimate the regression equation: y= a + bx
5
c. Test for the significance of the value of b at x y xy x2 y2 x- y- ( -x) (y- )
.05 level significance
21.5 5 107.5 462.25 25 -12.04 -33.5 403.34
23.7 20 474 561.69 400 -9.84 -18.5 182.04
25.7 35 899.5 660.49 1225 -7.84 -3.5 27.44
34 50 1700 1156 2500 0.46 11.5 5.29
22.5 10 225 506.25 100 -11.04 -28.5 314.64
53.5 60 3210 2862.25 3600 19.96 21.5 429.14
24.2 40 968 585.64 1600 -9.34 1.5 -14.01
27.4 40 1096 750.76 1600 -6.14 1.5 -9.21
38.5 55 2117.5 1482.25 3025 4.96 16.5 81.84
64.4 70 4508 4147.36 4900 30.86 31.5 972.09
 335.4 385 15305.5 13174.94 18975.00 0 0 2392.60

10(15305.5)−(335.4)(385)
b= 10(13174.9)−(335.4)2

b = 1.24

a = 38.5 – 1.24 (33.54)

a= -4.4120 , -4.27

y= a+bx

y= -4.41- 1.29x

y = -4.27 – 1.29x

r 0.85
covariance 265.8444444
covariance 265.8444444

c. Test for the significance of the value of b at .05 level significance

Significance level = 0.05

Standard error of regression slope = 0.5338282

T-value = 2.42462

Conclusion : I therefore conclude that there is a significant relationship

between the cost and outputs of production, Since the p value of 0.0419 (when
t is 2.42 and df is 8 ) is less than the significance level of 0.05, it can be said
that the slope of the regression line is significantly different from 0.
 a. Generate the equation y=a +bx

x y xy x2 y2
18.5 11.5 212.75 342.25 132.25
20 11 220 400 121
The data below shows the income (x) and the 35.2 23.2 816.64 1239.04 538.24
expenditure (y) in (P1,000) of typical household for a 22.8 15.6 355.68 519.84 243.36
period of 10 months.
20.4 10.5 214.2 416.16 110.25
a. Generate the equation y=a +bx 23.4 23.1 540.54 547.56 533.61
50.7 43.2 2190.24 2570.49 1866.24
b. Test for the significance of the value of b 65.2 60 3912 4251.04 3600
6 30.3 30.5 924.15 918.09 930.25
25 23 575 625 529
311.5 251.6 9961.2 11829.47 8604.20
 10(9961.2)−311.5(251.6)
b= 10(11829.47)−(311.5)2

b = 0.9988 / 1

a = 25.6 – 1(31.15)
a = 5.96

Y= 5.96 + 0.998X

b. Test for the significance of the value of b

∞ = 0.05

Standard error of regression slope = 0.37

T-value = 2.73

Conclusion : Since the p value of 0.0258 is less than the

significance level of 0.05 ,the slope of the regression line is
significantly different from 0 and there is a significant diffrence
betweeen income and ependiture of a household

a. Compute the value of r.

The following data show the total cost of
production of commodity z with the x y xy x2 y2
corresponding output over a period of 10 years. 21.5 5 107.5 462.25 25
23.7 20 474 561.69 400
a. Compute the value of r.
25.7 35 899.5 660.49 1225
7
b. Conduct a test of significance for the value 34 50 1700 1156 2500
of r. assume that ⍺=0.05 22.5 10 225 506.25 100
53.5 60 3210 2862.25 3600
24.2 40 968 585.64 1600
27.4 40 1096 750.76 1600
38.5 55 2117.5 1482.25 3025
 64.4 70 4508 4147.36 4900
335.4 385 15305.5 13174.94 18975.00

𝟏𝟎(𝟏𝟓𝟑𝟎𝟓.𝟓)−(𝟑𝟑𝟓.𝟒)(𝟑𝟖𝟓)
r=
[𝟏𝟎(𝟏𝟑𝟏𝟕𝟒.𝟗)−(𝟑𝟑𝟓.𝟒)𝟐 ][𝟏𝟎(𝟏𝟖𝟗𝟕𝟓)−(𝟑𝟖𝟓)𝟐
√

r = 0.8461. / 0.85

b. Conduct a test of significance for the value of r. assume that

⍺=0.05
0.05
∞= = 0.25
2

•. Tabular value = 0.25 and df = 8 is 2.306

•. Tcomputed

. R = 0.8461153

∞ = 0.05

Conclusion : Since the r value of .8461 is greater than the p critical value
of . 6319, it can be said that there is a significant linear realtionship
between the cost and output of production

A. Compute the value of r

the following values show the intelligence quotient (IQ)
and the corresponding NCEE scores of 10 incoming x y xy x2 y2
freshmen in a certain college.
8 120 96 11520 14400 9216
A. Compute the value f r 85 65 5525 7225 4225
B. Using a=.05 test the significance of the 110 65 7150 12100 4225
value of r
80 66 5280 6400 4356
 95 70 6650 9025 4900
90 86 7740 8100 7396
95 87 8265 9025 7569
112 93 10416 12544 8649
93 81 7533 8649 6561
86 90 7740 7396 8100
966 799 77819.0 94864.00 65197.00

𝟏𝟎(𝟕𝟕𝟖𝟏𝟗)−(𝟗𝟔𝟔)(𝟕𝟗𝟗)
r=
[𝟏𝟎(𝟗𝟒𝟖𝟔𝟒)−(𝟗𝟔𝟔)𝟐 ][𝟏𝟎(𝟔𝟓𝟏𝟗𝟕)−(𝟕𝟗𝟗)𝟐
√

r = 0.4384 / 0.44

B. Using a=.05 test the significance of the value of r

0.05
∞= = 0.25
2
T.tabular = 2.575

Tcomputed =

= 1.3858 / 1.39

Conclusion : I therefore conclude that Tcomputed is less than Ttabular so we

Accept Ho and Reject Ha

Since the value of R 0.4384 is less than the p critical value of .6319, there is no
significant relationship between IQ and NCEE scores of incoming freshmen
students.