CASE DESCRIPTION lier. The blood pressure was 160/90, the heart rate was
84, and she was afebrile. There was no jugular venous
A 74-year-old white woman with a three year history
distension. The lungs were clear. The cardiac examina-
of orthopnea, exertional dyspnea, and chest tightness
tion revealed a 2/6 continuous murmur, best heard at the
was admitted when these symptoms became acutely
left upper sternal border, which did not change with hand
,,:o.rse over a 2 week period. Her past history was sig-
~rip or Val~alva maneuver. There were no subconjunc-
mflcant for a mild chronic normochromic normocytic
tIval petechiae, Osler's nodes, Janeway lesions, or lym-
anemia, but was otherwise unremarkable. Her blood
phadenopathy. The white cell count was 11,000, with
pressure was 130170 mm Hg, and her heart rate was 76.
72% neutrophils, 9% lymphocytes, 15% monocytes, and
There was no jugular venous distension. Diffuse expira-
3% eosinophils. All five sets of blood cultures isolated
tory wheezes and bilateral basal rales were heard on lung
streptococcus sanguis. Pulsed Doppler echocardiography
exam, and the cardiac exam showed a 2-3/6 systolic
demons.trated continuous flow in the pulmonary artery,
murmur along the left sternal border. There was trace
suggestIve of a moderate sized patent ductus arteriosus.
edema. The chest X ray showed mild cardiomegaly, and
No valvular disease or vegetations were seen. She was
the ECG showed an inverted T wave in AVL, but was
treated with intravenous penicillin G for a total of 30
otherwise normal. Her admitting diagnosis was heart
days, and recovered. During her hospital stay she had
failure, and she improved with diuretic treatment. How-
two episodes of chest tightness, associated with new T
ever, echocardiography showed normal left ventricular
wave inversion in leads V2-V3. Myocardial infarction
wall.motion and valves, and the left ventricular ejection
was ruled out by cardiac enzymes.
fr~ctlOn was 70% by MUGA scan. Spirometry revealed
After discharge, she continued to have cxertional dys-
mlld obstructive lung disease. On the basis of these stud-
pnea, wheezing, orthopnea, and paroxysmal nocturnal
ies the diagnosis was changed to asthma, and treatment
dyspneain in spite of treatment for asthma. She was ad-
was changed to prednisone, albuterol, and theophylline.
mitted twice at age 86 with chest tightness similar to her
Two years later, she developed worsening exertional
and paroxysmal dyspnea, orthopnea, and bipedal edema, previ?us episodes: which was accompanied by deeper
antenor T wave mversion. Myocardial infarction was
and was eventually readmitted in respiratory failure. The
again ruled out by cardiac enzymes. A cardiac catheter-
blood pressure was 102/60 and the heart rate was 98.
ization was performed (Table I). Oximetry demonstrated
!he~e was no jugular venous distension. On lung exam-
a step-up in oxygen saturation from the right ventricle to
matIon, there were diffuse rhonchi, wheezes, and bilat-
the pulmonary artery (Fig. 1). There was mild pulmo-
eral basal rales. An S3 gallop was noted, and there was
nary hyp~rtension, and a calculated pulmonic to systemic
2 + bipedal edema. The ECG was unchanged. The chest
flow ratIO of 1. 5: 1 by oximetry. Early appearance of
X ray showed pulmonary congestion. She responded
contrast in the pulmonary artery was noted on 30 degree
well to intravenous diuretics, and therapy for asthma.
Pulm~nary congestion was thought to be due to respira-
tory dIstress syndrome, which was attributed to noncom- From the University of Rochester, New York.
pliance with asthma medications.
Later that year, she was readmitted with two weeks of Received June 4, 1992; revision accepted September 1, 1992.
intem:ittent high grade fevers, shaking chills, and ar-
Address reprint requests to Dr. Chi-Ling Hang, University of Roch-
thralglas. She had undergone root canal work and drain- ester, Cardiology Unit, Box 679, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester
age of a dental abscess approximately two months ear- NY 14642. '
...A
Fig. 2. A: Left ventriculography in the 30-degree RAO view, demonstrating the early appearance of contrast in
the pulmonary artery. B: Aortography in the 50-degree LAO view, demonstrating a small patent ductus and
contrast in the pulmonary artery.
of the patent ductus. Our patient not only presented with 2. Woodruff W, Gabliani G, Grant A: Patent ductus arteriosus in the
chest pain typical of exertional angina pectoris with nor- elderly. South Med J 76:1436, 1983.
3. Fontana R, Edwards J: "Congenital Cardiac Disease: A Review
mal coronaries, but also had significant ECG changes of 375 Cases Studied Pathologically." Philadelphia: W.B. Saun-
consistent with ischemia. She was found to have a wide ders Co., 1962.
pulse pressure (160/50) during catheterization. The eti- 4. Bank! H: "Congenital Malformations of the Heart and Great Ves-
ology of the angina may be similar to the mechanism sels: Synopsis of Pathology, Embryology and Natural History."
seen in aortic insufficiency [6]. The combination of sys- Baltimore: Urban and Schwarzenberg, 1977.
5. Zarich S, Leonardi H, Pippin J, Tuthill J, Lewis S: Patent ductus
temic arterial runoff through the patent ductus and left arteriosus in the elderly. Chest 94:1103-05, 1988.
ventricular diastolic overload/left ventricular hypertro- 6. Keys A, Shapiro MJ: Patency of the ductus arteriosus in adults.
phy may result in subendocardial hypoperfusion during Am Heart J 25:158-186, 1943.
physical exertion. 7. Campbell M: Natural history of persistent ductus arteriosus. Br
In premature infants, a patent ductus may be closed Heart J 30:4-13, 1968.
8. Danilowicz D: Patent ductus arteriosus: Recent advances. Hosp
pharmacologically with indomethicin. Surgical closure is
Med 47-72, April 1985.
required in infants unresponsive to indomethicin, and 9. Fairley GH, Goodwin IF: Patent ductus arteriosus in adult life.
may be accomplished at low risk in infants, children, and Brit J Dis Chest 53:261-277, 1959.
young adults. In adults, the risk of the operation may be 10. Erdman S, Levinsky L, Levy M: A simple method for closure of
increased by pulmonary hypertension and atherosclerotic patent ductus arteriosus in elderly patients. Ann Thorac Surg 27:
84, 1979.
changes in the great vessels. Erdman et al. [10] and
11. Bell-Thomson J, Jewell E, Ellis F, Schwaber J: Surgical tech-
Bell-Thomson et al. [11] have each described a simple nique in the management of patent ductus arteriosus in the elderly
surgical technique. Closure may also be performed per- patient. Ann Thorac Surg 30:80-83, 1980.
cutaneously, using a plug [12] or an umbrella occluder 12. Porstmann W, Wierny L, Warnke H, Gerstberger G, Romaniuk
via an arterial [13] or transvenous [14,15] approach. Our P: Catheter closure of the patent ductus arteriosus: 62 cases
treated without thoracotomy. Radiol Clin North Am 9:203-218,
patient, who has just celebrated her 87th birthday, re-
1971.
cently returned for follow-up without signs or symptoms 13. Rashkind W, Cuaso C: Transcatheter closure of patent ductus
of heart failure, and only rare episodes of chest pain. She arteriosus: Successful use with a 3.5 kilogram infant. Pediatr
does not wish closure of the defect, but will consider Cardiol 1:3-8, 1979.
transvenous catheter closure if her symptoms progress. 14. Bash S, Mullins C, Hellenbrand W, Tait M: Non-surgical closure
of patent ductus arteriosus: Clinical application of the Rashkind
PDA occluder system. Circulation 75:583, 1987.
REFERENCES 15. Wessel D, Keane J, Parness I, Lock J: Outpatient closure of the
patent ductus arteriosus. Circulation 77:1068-1071, 1988.
1. White P, Mazurkis S, Boschetti A: Patency of the ductus arteri-
osus at 90. N Engl J Med 280:146, 1969.