F. ASEP, F. PICE, L.M. ASCE How Regulatory Boards Came About
Three-man Board of Examiners for Civil Engineers was
authorized by Public Act No. 2985 of February 1921 with the Secretary of Commerce and Communications as the appointing authority. In 1932, the Board was transferred under the Department of Public Works and Communications, with the Director of Civil Service as the Executive Officer of the Boards1. June 17, 1950 Republic Act 544, entitled an Act Regulating the Practice of Civil Engineering in the Philippines, now commonly known as the CE Law Initially under the Civil Service Commission, later in 1973 under the Professional Regulation Commission 1960s Association of Structural Engineers of the Philippines, September 1961 » Published Manual of Practice which included Scope of Services, Schedule of Fees and Code of Ethics. » Report of Lateral Loads Committee for Earthquake and Wind Loads led to the first Seismic Zone Map of the Philippines » Debated the Proposed Structural Engineering Law August 2, 1968 : Manila (Ruby Tower) Earthquake, 6.8 magnitude followed by April 1970 earthquake and Typhoon Yoling at 160 MPH Senate Building Code Committee formed, 1969 Late 1960s, several personalities as Guest Speakers John Blume Associate (Worling Wylie Jr.) of San Francisco, Calif Felix Kulka, Vice Pres. of T.Y. Lin Consultants Dr. Lambert Tall, Lehigh University, Pennsylvania Dean Nathan M. Newmark, University of Illinois, USA 1970s
National Structural Code of the
Philippines, 1972, First Edition, later endorsed by Secretary of Public Works Alfredo Juinio as part of National Building Code of the Philippines, P.D. 1096 Started Use of Desktop or Mini Computers , widely used for the first ADB Building, now the Dept of Foreign Affairs Bldg., on Roxas Blvd. 1970s Wind Effects Conference in Manila, UNDP and JICA sponsored, led to a Wind Zone Map, after Typhoon Yoling National Building Code, P.D. 1096 was promulgated which referred to the NSCP as the referral code for structures ASEP Sponsored ACI Building Code Seminar, December 1979 two members of the ACI Code Committee as main speakers Projects in the 1970s Leyte-Samar Multi-Span and Multi-type Bridge
Pantabangan Multi-Purpose Dam Project in
Nueva Ecija
North Expressway Extension to Dau,
Pampanga Thru a Viaduct 1980s LRT Line 1 started and completed 1983 Philippine Nuclear Power Plant in Bataan By mid-1980s, only significant structures were the ADB Bldg on EDSA Ortigas, and Pacific Star (then named Nauru) Bldg on Buendia Avenue 1980s ASEP worked on the 3rd Edition of the NSCP Vol 1, and the 1st Edition of Vol 2 for Bridges First High-Rise, Pacific Plaza Bldg on Ayala Ave Mini-computers or desktops more commonly used with software available for them 1990s Luzon Earthquake July 1990, Pinatubo Eruption and Typhoon Ruping in 1991 Severe power shortage, Calaca Power Plant Unit 2 ASEP Guide for Earthquake Design, 1991
High rise buildings construction, 2nd Mactan-
Mandaue Bridge, an extradosed prestressed concrete structure 2000 and beyond ASEP Earthquake Design Manual, 2001
NSCP, Volume 1, Buildings 6th
Edition, 2010 2000 and beyond 2011, ASEP marks its 50th Anniversary, recognizes 50 outstanding structural engineers Continuing economic growth spurred by real estate and building boom ASEAN Integration and cross-country practice Recommended readings on civil engineering history The Tower and the Bridge, David P. Billington, Princeton University, Chapters 1 & 2
Elementary Structural Analysis, John Wilbur and
Charles Norris, McGraw-Hill, Introduction
The Ancient Engineers, L. Sprague de Camp,
published by Barnes & Noble, 1993 Fees
Challenges confronting the profession requires taking
serious look at FEES’ determination » Locally, the present situation is a sellers’ market » Avoid price-bidding and its serious effects » How to price services for cross-country services » “Putting a price on human ingenuity. How much is an engineer’s solution worth?” Fees Historically, Percentage (%) of Project Cost has been the norm. But there are other ways, such as : » World Bank and ADB, mainly for government projects with loan covenants, based on the engineers time and compensation rates. » US Dept of Defense works, fees were negotiated based on sheet counts, assigning number of hours consumed per sheet or drawing. Fees ASCE Salary Cost times a Multiplier, plus the non- salary related costs. » Need to review the size of the Multiplier, to distinguish the situation from the US practice » Economic or financial situations could also be considered in arriving at this Multiplier, higher or lower based on supply and demand, or other commercial considerations Fees How to price Peer Review or Value Engineering work » PICE Value Engineering Manual suggests veering away from the percentage of “savings” concept Peer Review vs Value Engineering “Despite certain similarities, the project design peer review is not a value engineering study…
Value engineering assumes an adequate design
and attempts to match the effectiveness of the design while reducing cost, whereas a project peer review focuses on the quality of the design in meeting the project objectives (while still cognizant of cost).”
- ASCE Manuel 73, 2nd Ed., page 206
Which way to go Need to arrive at a consensus on which method/s should be the prevalent practice – one method does not suit all
Keep in mind the ethics and the esteem with
which pricing of the structural engineer’s service deserves
Keep away from engineer selection that may
result in price-bidding Ethics and Ethical Conduct WHY?
Present and near future market situation
How to handle Value Engineering and Peer
Review services
This presentation will cover only three of the
canons of Ethics PRICE - Bidding “It shall be considered unprofessional and inconsistent with honorable and dignified bearing for any member of the ASCE… to state a price for engineering services… when there are reasonable grounds for belief that price will be the prime consideration in the selection of the engineer….” “… ASCE is constrained from prohibiting or limiting the submission of fee quotations for engineering services and such prohibition or limitation has been removed from the Code of Ethics. However, the procurement of engineering services involves considerations of factors in addition to fee, and those factors should be evaluated carefully in securing professional services.” Reviews “To review the work of another engineer for the same client, except with the knowledge of such engineer, unless such engineer's engagement on the work which is subject to review has been terminated.”
A subsequent statement under that article
provides that:
“… even though the first engineer's services
have been terminated, it is a matter of common courtesy to let him know that his work is being reviewed.” Article 4 of our Code of Ethics, also from the old ASCE Code:
“It shall be considered unprofessional... to
attempt to injure, falsely or maliciously, the professional reputation, business, or employment position of another engineer. This does not remove the moral obligation to expose unethical conduct before the proper authorities. Neither does it preclude a frank but private appraisal of employees or of engineers being considered for employment.” New ASCE Code, Article 7 states that:
“Engineers shall continue their
professional development throughout their careers, and shall provide opportunities for the professional development of those engineers under their supervision.“ How to achieve better ethical conduct Better elaboration and dissemination of the guiding principles of the Canons of Ethics Have the subject of ethics made part of the Board examinations and licensure requirements More positive approaches in the teaching of Ethics in engineering school. Conclusion History gives the engineer better appreciation of his professions contribution to society and thus elevate his personal esteem Better ways of FEES determination will lead to proper and more deliberate approaches to ‘marketing’ the services Ethics provides proper norms of conduct of the profession given the growing complexity of the practice. Thank You!