The English language has undoubtedly been enriched by foreign loan words. However, it is not
merely by borrowing that its vocabulary has been made richer. The chief enrichment of language has been
due to the regular processes of word formation; the addition of new words to the English vocabulary which
have been formed by old and familiar material. A large part of the speech is made up of words formed from
native elements or from those foreign ones which have become thoroughly naturalized in the language.
There are several processes by which new words have been formed- by derivation (by adding prefixes and
suffixes); by word composition (in which two or more existing words are combined to form compounds); by
using existing words as other parts of speech (conversion); through processes of back-formation and
shortening.
Derivation
One of the commonest as well as oldest methods of word-making is called derivation. Derivation is a
process of word formation by which a new word is formed by the addition of a prefix or a suffix to an
existing word. A prefix is put before a word whereas a suffix is put at the end of a word. Bitterness and
kindness are formed by adding the suffix -ness to bitter and kind; misconduct and misbehaviour are formed
by adding the prefix mis- to conduct and behaviour. It is necessary to distinguish derivation from inflection.
Both make use of suffixes but derivation makes a new word (good-goodness, author-authorship), whereas
inflections merely change the form of the word to mark such distinctions as those of case, number, tense,
person etc. (look-looks-looked-looking). The affixes (prefixes and suffixes) can be divided into two
categories- native and foreign.
Native Affixes
New words are formed by adding affixes of native origin to both native and foreign words. Some
much used native suffixes are as follows:
Suffixes used to form substantives-
(i) -dom ( Christendom, boredom, freedom, martyrdom),
(ii) -ship (ownership, companionship, craftsmanship, horsemanship),
(iii)-ness ( goodness, kindness, truthfulness, bitterness);
suffixes used to form adjectives-
(iv) -ly (lordly, cowardly, heavenly, scholarly),
(v) -y (fiery, creepy, noisy, healthy),
(vi) -ful (powerful, fanciful, harmful, cheerful) and
(vii) -ed ( blue-eyed, good-natured, renowned).
Native prefixes of wide application are:
(i) mis- (mismanage, mislead, misconception, misrepresentation),
(ii) un- (unhappy, unfair, unprofessional, unkind),
(iii)be- (befool, befriend, bemoan).
(i) The Old English ending –isc (now –ish) was chiefly added to names of places or nations to
form adjectives like Englisc (English). It was first extended to words whose meanings were
cognate to these national names (for e.g. heathenish), then gradually came words like
childish, churlish. From 16th century it began to be used to form adjectives like bookish,
greenish, et al.
(ii) The use of ending –en to denote female beings (corresponding to the masculine peow, fox,
we find the feminine piewen, fyxen) was gradually discarded because of some difficulty of
application and the French ending –ess came to be used extensively.
(iii) Another extensively used ending is –er (OE –ere). At first its use was limited to the making
of nouns denoting agents from other nouns only but now we make new words by adding –er
to verbs (e.g. snorer, sitter, writer, reader).
(iv) A variant or –er is –eer, (sonneteer, pamphleteer, profiteer). Another variant of –er is –ster
(gangster, fibster, youngster).
(v) The suffix –en is added to adjectives to form verbs- harden, weaken, sweeten, and lessen.
Foreign Affixes
Apart from these native affixes there, English language has been enriched by a multitude of
derivatives formed with the affixes borrowed from other languages. Most of these affixes, like the native
ones, can be appended to words of both native and foreign origin to form new derivatives.
French Affixes- Of the French affixes that have taken root in English, some are as follows:
(i) en- (prefixed to nouns, adjectives, verbs to form verbs as enlist, enslave, endanger, endear,
enlarge, enact)
(ii) -ment (added to verbs to form nouns such as nourishment, enlightenment, acknowledgement,
employment)
(iii) -ess (this French suffix has been naturalised and by means of this suffix feminine nouns like
shepherdess, goddess, countess, hostess, lioness can be derived)
(iv) -able ( serviceable, companionable, drinkable, punishable, unutterable)
(v) -esque (picturesque, picaresque, Romanesque)
(vi) –age (mileage, breakage, shortage)
(vii) -ee (appended to verbs to denote persons affected by the action, as employee, trustee,
examinee, nominee)
(viii) demi- (meaning half, semi, such as demi-god, demi-angel).
Latin Affixes- Latin affixes in English have acquired great vitality, some are as follows:
(i) -al (suffixed to verbs to form nouns of action- arrival, refusal, betrothal, renewal; to nouns to
form adjectives- brutal, musical)
(ii) -ous (to form adjectives from nouns- dangerous, murderous)
(iii) -ation (organisation, starvation, mystification)
(iv) re- (recover, reappear, renew, recollection)
(v) post- (postscript, postwar, postgraduate)
(vi) dis- (distrust, disobedient, disease, disbelieve)
(vii) pre- (Pre- Raphaelite, pre-war)
(viii) pro- ( pro-British, pro-Vice Chancellor).
Greek Affixes- Some of the most vital affixes are Greek in origin:
Derivation is a method by which new words are formed by adding something to existing words. The
two processes, back-formation and shortening form words, not by adding, but by subtracting something from
existing words. They have had a considerable share in the formation of the English vocabulary.
Back-formation
Back-formation is a word-making process by which new words are formed by subtracting something
from old ones. According to Jespersen such back-formations, as they are very conveniently termed by Dr.
Murrray, owe their origin to one part of the word being mistaken for some derivative suffix. The adverbs
sideling, grovelling and darkling were originally formed by the means of the adverbial ending –ling, but in
such phrases as ‘he walks sideling’, ‘he lies grovelling’, etc., they looked exactly like participles in –ing, and
the consequence was that the new verbs to sidle, to grovel, and to darkle were derived from them by the
subtraction of –ing. The Banting cure was named after one Mr. Banting; the occasional verb to bant is
accordingly, a back-formation. The ending which is often subtracted is –y. The noun greed, the verbs laze,
cose and jeopardy are derived respectively from greedy, lazy, cosy and jeopardy by the subtraction of –y.
The old adjective corresponding to difficult was difficile as in French, but about 1600 the adjective difficult
(the noun minus y) made its appearance. Puppy from French poupee was thought to be formed by means of
the petting suffix y, and thus pup was created; the words cad and pet were similarly formed from caddy and
petty respectively. Several verbs originate from nouns in –er (-ar, -or), which were not originally agent
nouns. Verbs have been formed from them by the subtraction of –er. The nouns harbinger, rover, pedlar,
burglar, hawker, beggar, butcher call into existence the verbs to harbinge, rove, peddle, burgle, hawk, beg
and butch; and the Latin words editor, donator, vivisector, produce the un-Latin verbs to edit, donate,
vivisect, etc. Some of these back-formations have been more successful than others in being generally
recognized in Standard English. It is not usual in Germanic languages (English being one of them) to form
compounds with a verb as the second, and an object or a predicative as the first part. Hence, when we find
such verbs as to housekeep, the explanation must be that –er has been subtracted from the perfectly
legitimate noun housekeeper (or –ing from housekeeping). The other examples of this formation are to
backbite, to partake, to soothsay, conycatch, to dressmake, to matchmake, to typewrite etc. The verbs to
henpeck and to sunburn are back-formations from the participles henpecked and sunburnt.
Shortening
Word formation is a continuum in which categories shade into each other and the fluidness of
word-formation arises both from complex processes of change over centuries and from casual usage
untouched by the theories of language.