1 2 3
Introduction Clinical profile Real-world experience
4 5 6
Overview of safety profile Programmatic fit Summary
Contents
GSK DTaP Hexavalent Vaccine : 17 years of experience
1 2 3
Introduction Clinical profile Real-world experience
4 5 6
Overview of safety profile Programmatic fit Summary
Combination vaccines offer a range of benefits over
monovalent vaccines
Fewer injections per clinic visit1 Reduced time loss for parents and
increased efficiency for HCPs1
1. Koslap-Petraco MB et al. J Pediatr Health Care 2008;22:300–309; 2. Kalies H et al. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2006;25:507–512; 3. Marshall GS et al. Pediatr Infect Dis J
4
2007;26:496–500
What is GSK DTaP hexavalent vaccine?
Diphtheria
Tetanus 2+1
Pertussis
Hib†
Poliomyelitis 3+1
Hepatitis B
*Containing active substances derived from diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis and Hib bacteria, the hepatitis B virus, and inactivated polioviruses 1, 2 and 3;
†Hib is provided as a separate powder and must be reconstituted in the DTPa-HBV-IPV suspension before use;
‡Schedule dependent on locally applied/recommended schedule as per local licensing;
§No data are available
– DTaP-HB-IPV/Hib Vaccine was first licensed in 2000 and is the latest step in the
development of the DTaP vaccine family1–8
DTPa/Hib DTPa-IPV/Hib
DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib
+ Hib
Diphtheria
DTPa Tetanus
Pertussis (acellular)
+ Polio Hib*
Poliomyelitis
Hepatitis B
DTPa-IPV DTPa-HBV† DTPa-HBV-IPV
+ Hep B
*Hib is provided as a separate powder and must be reconstituted in the DTPa-HBV-IPV suspension before use;
†DTPa-HBV is no longer available; ‡Previously marketed ex-US as Infanrix Penta
DTPa, diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis; HBV, hepatitis B virus; Hib, Haemophilus influenzae type b; IPV, inactivated polio virus
1. André FE. Vaccine 1999;17:1620–1627; 2. Capiau C et al. Vaccine 2003;21:2273–2287; 3. Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, 2014 Vaccines against poliomyelitis; 4. European Medicines
Agency (EMA). Public Statement on Infanrix penta, 2013 (EMA/376372/2013); 5. Bogaerts H. An Pediatr 2003;58(Suppl5):41–46; 6. GSK. Hiberix US PI. FDA 2016; 7. World
Health Organization (WHO), 2010. Poliorix package insert; 8. GSK. Engerix B PI Approved BPOM GDS12/IPI08 (14 February 2017). See slide notes for full reference information.
GSK DTaP hexavalent vaccine has been extensively
evaluated in clinical trials and real-world practice
1 2 3
Introduction Clinical profile Real-world experience
4 5 6
Overview of safety profile Programmatic fit Summary
GSK DTaP hexavalent vaccine
clinical development programme
Objectives of the GSK DTaP hexavalent vaccine pivotal trials Additional Ph IIIb/IV studies
Additional schedules
• Compare primary eg EPI, mixed,
immunisation ± HBV 2+1, 3+19,15‒17
3+1 schedule*4‒6 vaccine at birth9
Co-administration
• Assess booster with other
vaccination, immune paediatric vaccines18
N=1693 24 6 ≥96.6%
6 studies Seropositivity/seroprotection
(weeks)
N=265 6 10 14 ≥95.7%
1 study Seropositivity/seroprotection†
*Seroprotective thresholds: anti-diphtheria, ≥0.1 IU/mL; anti-tetanus, ≥0.1 IU/mL; anti-HBs, ≥10 mIU/mL; anti-polio, ≥1/8 dilution; anti-PRP, ≥0.15 g/mL; Seropositivity thresholds:
pertussis antigens PT, FHA, PRN ≥5 EL.U/mL;
†In a subgroup of infants not administered hepatitis B vaccine at birth, 77.7% of subjects had anti-HBs titres ≥10 mIU/mL;
‡Post-booster, 98.4% of subjects had anti-PRP concentration ≥1 µg/mL indicative of long-term protection
EL.U, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test units; FHA, filamentous haemagglutinin; HBs, hepatitis B surface antigen; IU, international units; PRN, pertactin; PRP, polyribosylribitol
phosphate; PT, pertussis toxoid
Dosing at months:
3 4 5 N=22,505
C=360
88.7% GSK
GSK DTaP
vaccine efficacy† Hexavalent
DTaP Vx
Vx
N=9554** 86.0%
C=120 vaccine efficacy§
*Laboratory confirmed Bordetella pertussis infection, no PCR, spasmodic cough ≥21 days; †As of 1 month after dose 3; ‡During a 30-month continued follow-up in a subset of children;
§At up to 60 months since last priming dose; Number of vaccine groups subjects relevant to efficacy calculation: ¶ n=4481, c=37; ** n=4217, c=33
C, number of pertussis cases considered for evaluation as per WHO definition;* N, number of enrolled subjects; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; WHO, World Health Organization
1. Schmitt HJ et al. JAMA 1996;275:37–41; 2. Greco D et al. N Engl J Med 1996;334:341–348; 3. Salmaso S et al. Pediatrics 2001;108:E81; 4. GSK. Infanrix hexa BPOM
12
approval GDS14/IPI10. Date of issue:13/03/2014.
Documented immune persistence across vaccine antigens* for up to
7 years with a 3+1 schedule1–3
100
seropositivity (%) †
80
60
40
20
0 Anti-diphtheria‡ Anti-tetanus* Anti-PT* Anti-FHA Anti-PRN Anti-HBs Anti-PRP Anti-polio type1 Anti-polio type2 Anti-polio type3
Figure created from data tables2,3 Age 4‒6 years, N=174–198 Age 7‒9 years, N=51–193
polio type1/2/3, ≥1/8 dilution; ‡Data for 4–6 years consider the neutralisation assay in addition to ELISA, if only ELISA 68.7 (61.7, 75.1)3
EL.U, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test units; FHA, filamentous haemagglutinin; HBs, hepatitis B surface antigen; HBV, hepatitis B virus; Hib, Haemophilus influenzae type b; IU, international
units; PRN, pertactin; PRP, polyribosylribitol phosphate; PT, pertussis toxoid
1. Zinke M et al. Hum Vaccin 2010;6:189–93; 2. GSK. Infanrix hexa BPOM approval GDS14/IPI10. Date of issue:13/03/2014. 3. GSK. Data on file, 2014N203547_00 – Infanrix 17
hexa persistence data graphed in Zinke et al. 2010
Hepatitis B
Quick Key Fact
234 11–14
98.4%
97.6% overall produced an
had seroprotective anamnestic response (n=289)
(95.1–99.0)
antibody titres against
hepatitis B†1
initially seronegative subjects
92.1% (anti-HBs <6.2 mIU/mL) produced
(84.5–96.8) an anamnestic response (n=89)
*Pooled across different primary vaccination schedules; †Defined as subjects with an anti-HBs titre ≥10 mIU/mL
HBs, hepatitis B surface antigen; HBV, hepatitis B vaccine; IU, international units
1. GSK. Infanrix hexa BPOM approval GDS14/IPI10. Date of issue:13/03/2014. 2. Behre U et al. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2016;12:2916–2920
15
Preterm infants are at increased risk of acquiring
pertussis and having severe outcomes1–3
5x 2x
Increased risk of severe disease Increased risk of hospitalisation
with a history of prematurity in preterm vs full term infants
(OR: 5.00; 95% CI: 1.27, 19.71)1 (IRR: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.47, 2.71)2
4.5x ~4x
Increased risk of disease Increased risk of death
in infants born at 23–27 weeks vs full term in infants born at <36 vs ≥36 weeks
(IRR: 4.49, 95% CI: 2.33, 8.67)2 (OR: 3.8; 95% CI: 2.0, 7.0)3
1. Marshall H et al. Pediatr Infect Dis 2015;34:339–345; 2. Riise OR et al. Pediatr Infect Dis 2017;36:e151–e156; 3. Haberling DL et al. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2009;28:194–198;
20
4. Tozzi AE et al. Vaccine 2014;32:793–799
High immunogenicity against pertussis in preterms was
observed with GSK DTaP hexavalent vaccine1,2
2 4 6 months 2 4 6 18–24 months
Primary vaccination1 1 month after
booster vaccination1
100 100
80 80
60 60
40 40
20 20
0 0
Anti-PT Anti-FHA Anti-PRN Anti-PT Anti-FHA Anti-PRN
Vaccine response Vaccine response
1. Vazquez L et al. Acta Pædiatrica 2008;97:1243–1249; 2. Omeñaca F et al. Vaccine doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.01.005
21
The graphs have been independently created by GSK using data from the source
Contents
GSK DTaP hexavalent vaccine: 17 years of experience
1 2 3
Introduction Clinical profile Real-world experience
4 5 6
Overview of safety profile Programmatic fit Summary
Pertussis
Quick Key Fact
Cause Symptoms
• Respiratory infection Prevention
caused by the Gram-
negative bacterium
Bordetella pertussis1
• Not all patients present with • Vaccination is the most
the characteristic ‘whoop’ important preventative
Contagiousness when coughing; they may strategy against
present with vomiting, sleep pertussis1,2
• One case can lead problems and exhaustion2,3 • As vaccination does not
to up to 17 cases in
• Young children may turn blue provide lifelong immunity
an unvaccinated against pertussis, booster
population4 from a lack of air while
coughing2,3 vaccinations are needed to
• Asymptomatic carriers, maintain protection at an
particularly adults and • Initial symptoms are similar individual and community
adolescents, are one of the main to those of the common cold,
sources of infection1,2
level2
including a runny nose, slight
• Three-quarters of infants fever and a sore throat2,3 • Every infection prevented is
0‒3 months of age catch the one that needs no treatment
infection from family members, (lowering the need for
primarily from their mothers5 antibiotic use)3
1. World Health Organization (WHO). Wkly Epidemiol Rec 2015;35:433–460; 2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2018. Pertussis. In: The Pink Book:
23
Epidemiology and Prevention of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/pert.html (accessed August 2018); 3. National Health Service (NHS)
Choices, 2016. Whooping cough. http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/Whooping-cough/Pages/Introduction.aspx (accessed August 2018); 4. Kilgore PE et al. Clin Microbiol Rev
2016;29:449–486; 5. Bisgard KM et al. Pediatr Infect Dis 2004;23:985–989
Pertussis disease control: real-world evidence
Disease reduction with DTPa vaccination 2+1 schedule in Italy and Sweden*
60
40
20
0
1925 1940 1955 1961 1970 1985 1995 2000 2012
Figure is reproduced with modifications from a royalty-free source (Eurosurveillance): Gonfiantini MV et al.
Epidemiology of pertussis in Italy: Disease trends over the last century. Euro Surveill 2014;19(40):pii=20921
140
(per 100,000)
120
100 Mainly GSK DTaP vaccine used
80 from 1996–1998 (except
60 Gothenburg area)
40
20
0
1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015
*Since pertussis immunisation recommendations were issued in 1961, Italy has always used a 2+1 vaccination schedule, while in Sweden, DTPa has been administered in a 2+1
schedule since 1996; †GSK market knowledge: Infanrix hexa has been used exclusively from 2006–2015
DTPa, diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis; DTPw, diphtheria-tetanus-whole-cell pertussis; SP-MSD Pa2c, Sanofi Pasteur-MSD two-component acellular pertussis vaccine
1. Gonfiantini MV et al. Euro Surveill 2014;19:pii=20921; 2. Swedish Institute for Communicable Disease Control, 2017. Pertussis surveillance in Sweden – Nineteen year report.
18
https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/contentassets/65ed8f6dbdab4999bc358fcd9b657e77/pertussis-sweden-nineteen-year-report.pdf (accessed March 2018); 3. Sanofi Pasteur
MSD. Hexavac EPAR – scientific conclusion. EMA, 2012. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-
_Scientific_Conclusion/human/000298/WC500074684.pdf (accessed March 2018)
Haemophillus Influenzae Type B
Quick Key Fact
Two hexavalent
5 years1
vaccines (including 3 90.4 (70.6–96.8)
(N=2893)
GSK DTaP
hexavalent
vaccine) 3+1 100.0 (52.7–100.0)
3 89.6
Two hexavalent
7 years2 vaccines (including
GSK DTaP 3+1 100.0
hexavalent
vaccine)
1. Kalies H et al. Vaccine 2008;26:2545–2552; 2. GSK. Infanrix hexa BPOM approval GDS14/IPI10. Date of issue:13/03/2014.
22
Contents
GSK DTaP hexavalent vaccine: 17 years of experience
1 2 3
Introduction Clinical profile Real-world experience
4 5 6
Overview of safety profile Programmatic fit Summary
In clinical trials, GSK DTaP hexavalent vaccine was
generally well tolerated in children <2 years of age1–8*
100
Doses followed by a reaction (%, ± 95% CI)†
Solicited local
60 injection-site reactions Solicited systemic reactions
40
20
0
Pain Redness Swelling Drowsiness Irritability/ Loss of Fever Diarrhoea Vomiting Restlessness Unusual
fussiness appetite crying
*Grade 3 reactions defined as: pain, crying when a limb was moved, or spontaneously painful; redness and swelling, diameter >20 mm;
†Symptoms reported during the 4-day post-vaccination period (Days 0–3); ‡Pooled analysis of GSK-sponsored interventional studies
1. GSK. Infanrix hexa EU SmPC. EMA, 2018. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/000296/WC500032505.pdf (accessed March 2018);
2. Arístegui J et al. Vaccine 2003;21:3593–600; 3. Zepp F et al. Vaccine 2004;22:2226–2233; 4. Schmitt HJ et al. J Pediatr 2000;137:304–312; 5. Avdicová M et al. Eur J Pediatr 2002;161:581–587; 24
6. Gatchalian S et al. Philipp J Pediatr 2007;56:153–161; 7. Tichmann I et al. Hum Vaccin 2006;2:249–254; 8. Heininger U et al. Vaccine 2007;25:1055–1063; 9. GSK. Data on file, 2016N295531_00 – Pooled
safety analyses Infanrix hexa as reflected in SmPC since 2008 (GDS 8.0)
More than 17 years of post-marketing safety surveillance
Safety profile of GSK DTaP hexavalent vaccine administered as a 2+1 or 3+1
schedule
1. GSK. Data on file, 2017N344344_00 – Doses sold DTP vaccines from launch until Sept 2017; 2. Baldo V et al. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2014;10:129–137
26
Contents
GSK DTaP hexavalent vaccine: 17 years of experience
1 2 3
Introduction Clinical profile Real-world experience
4 5 6
Overview of safety profile Programmatic fit Summary
GSK DTaP hexavalent vaccine has the widest documented
co-administration options of any 6-in-1* vaccine1‒3
Pneumococcal MMRV
Rotavirus vaccines
vaccines vaccines
*Containing active substances derived from diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis and Haemophilus influenzae type b bacteria, the hepatitis B virus, and inactivated polioviruses;
†A potential increased risk of fever or convulsion (with or without fever) has been observed when Infanrix hexa is co-administered with Prevnar or Prevnar131;
‡Due to an increased risk of fever, tenderness at the injection site, change in eating habits and irritability when Bexsero is co-administered with other vaccines, separate vaccinations
1. GSK. Infanrix hexa BPOM approval GDS14/IPI10. Date of issue:13/03/2014. ; 2. Sanofi Pasteur SA. Hexyon SmPC, 2018; 3. MCM Vaccine BV. Vaxelis SmPC, 2017; 4. Chevallier B et al. Pediatr Infect
Dis J 2009;28:S109–18; 5. Tichmann-Schumann I et al. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2005;24:70–77; 6. Gimenez-Sanchez F et al. Vaccine 2011;29:6042–6048 7. Vesikari T et al. Vaccine 2010;28:5272–5279; 8. 28
Ciarlet M et al. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2009;28:177–181; 9. Zepp F et al. Eur J Pediatr 2007;166:857–64; 10. Deichmann KA et al. Vaccine 2015;33:2379–86.
GSK DTaP hexavalent vaccine can be used in a
range of standard vaccination schedules1
GSK DTaP hexavalent vaccine was highly immunogenic and well tolerated
when evaluated in different vaccination schedules2–7
Preferably
3-dose <18 months of age
schedule
Preferably
2-dose between 11 and
schedule 13 months of age
Preferably
EPI*
<2 years of age1,8
*A birth dose of HBV vaccine must be given; recommended vaccine schedule is at 6, 10, 14 weeks
EPI, Expanded Program on Immunization; HBV, hepatitis B vaccine
(0, 1 mo) 2
3
3x
4
HBV
5
6
4x
HBV
7
5x 7,8
HBV
GSK DTaP hexavalent vaccine can be given regardless of whether infants received an HBV
vaccine at birth*
*In the EPI schedule, a birth dose of HBV vaccine must be given when no HBV booster vaccination is provided;1
†
From 6 weeks to 6 months of age
EPI, Expanded Program on Immunization; HBV, hepatitis B vaccine
1. GSK. Infanrix hexa BPOM approval GDS14/IPI10. Date of issue:13/03/2014. ; 2. Lim FS et al. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2007;36:801–806; 3. Tejedor JC et al. Pediatr Infect
Dis J 2006;25:713–720; 4. Reinert P et al. Arch Pediatr 2008;15:263–270; 5. Avdicová M et al. Eur J Pediatr 2002;161:581–587; 6. Pichichero ME et al. Pediatr Infect Dis J 32
2002;21:854–859; 7. Gatchalian S et al. Philipp J Pediatr 2007;56:153–161; 8. Cheng HK et al. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2004;35:685–692
Contents
GSK DTaP hexavalent vaccine: 17 years of experience
1 2 3
Introduction Clinical profile Real-world experience
4 5 6
Overview of safety profile Programmatic fit Summary
Summary: GSK DTaP hexavalent vaccine
*Containing active substances derived from diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis and Haemophilus influenzae type b bacteria, the hepatitis B virus, and inactivated polioviruses 1, 2 and 3;
†Immune persistence to 3+1 schedule