Engineering Geology
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/enggeo
Technical Note
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: The shear strength of rock discontinuities strongly depends on the water content especially when the rocks
Received 14 September 2012 contain clay materials. To assess the decrease in the mechanical properties of clay-infilled discontinuities due
Received in revised form 20 January 2013 to water saturation, a series of direct shear tests was performed using an advanced shear box that allows the
Accepted 5 February 2013
injection of water into the discontinuity. Results show that both the friction coefficient and the cohesion de-
Available online 14 February 2013
crease when the discontinuity is saturated. Overall, the shear strength of the discontinuity is considerably re-
Keywords:
duced to approximately 50% of its original value. This reduction has to be accounted for when conducting
Rock discontinuity stability analyses of rock slopes, dam foundations or underground openings.
Clay infill material © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Direct shear test
Water saturation
Shear strength reduction
Lubrication
0013-7952/$ – see front matter © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.02.002
34 F.L. Pellet et al. / Engineering Geology 157 (2013) 33–38
Table 1
Average values of mechanical and physical properties of the marl under study.
After Fabre and Pellet (2006) and Pellet and Fabre (2007).
therefore avoiding half box rotation. The tests can be performed with
a Constant Normal Load or by imposing a Constant Volume with no
joint dilation and no joint compaction. This equipment also allows
the hydro-mechanical behavior of rock discontinuities to be studied
using fluid injection into the center of the specimen. An extensive de-
scription was given by Hans and Boulon (2003) and by Buzzi et al.
(2007). The overall dimensions of this equipment, which is shown
in Fig. 1, are 1.2 m × 1.2 m.
The specimens used were marl cores retrieved from borehole.
They were 79 mm in diameter and 80 mm in height. These specimens
were then sawed in half; consequently the artificially created disconti-
nuities were perfectly smooth. Afterwards, the two parts of the speci-
men were sealed in the steel half boxes using a cement mortar made
up of a mixture of fast-curing cement and Vicat ordinary cement pre-
pared with an optimal ratio to obtain maximum strength for a mini-
mum curing time. Fig. 2 shows the two half boxes before and after
assembly, ready to be tested. The external dimensions of a half box
are 140 mm× 140 mm.
The main part of the testing program was the direct shear tests
that were performed on the marl discontinuities in parallel to the
joint surface. Additionally, in order to fully characterize the rock dis- Fig. 2. Specimen preparation: marl specimen sealed with a mortar in one half box (top
picture); the two half box assemblies ready to be installed in the shear box (bottom
continuities under study, a few swelling tests and some compression
picture); dimensions of the boxes are 140 mm × 140 mm.
tests were performed prior to the direct shear test.
Direct shear tests were carried out under two different humidity
conditions. The first series of tests were conducted on dry discontinu- discontinuity tends to dilate or to contract during shearing. The testing
ities and the second on discontinuities that had been saturated with conditions of the performed tests are summarized in Table 2.
water. The objective of these tests was to determine the effect of
the humidity conditions on the mechanical properties including the 3. Test results and discussion
friction coefficient and the cohesion of the discontinuities.
Direct shear tests were carried out with a shearing rate of 0.05 mm/s. 3.1. Swelling test
They were performed with either a Constant Normal Load (CNL) or at a
Constant Volume (CV). Both types of tests are able to determine if the To measure the swelling of the marl discontinuities, water was
injected into the center of the specimen after having applied a little
normal stress of about 0.1 MPa. Water injections were performed
twice a day, 5 to 12 h apart. During the test, the normal displacement
Place for boxes was kept at almost zero. Fig. 3 shows results for test TW-CV-21, where
the displacement was controlled and the increase of normal stress with
respect to time was recorded. After three days of water injection
(4300 min), the normal stress stabilized to 0.58 MPa. We can therefore
conclude that this clay is moderately susceptible to swelling due to the
Table 2
Shear test program and testing conditions: Constant Normal Load (CNL) and Constant
Volume (CV).
TD-CV-02 Dry CV 2
TD-CNL-03 Dry CNL 2, 5, 10, 16
TD-CNL-04 Dry CNL 5
TD-CV-05 Dry CV 5
TD-CV-06 Dry CV 16
TD-CV-17 Dry CV 5, 10, 12
TW-CNL-07 Saturated CNL 2, 5, 10,16
Fig. 1. Photograph of the shearing equipment (BCR3D).
TW-CV-21 Saturated CV 5, 10, 12
After Hans and Boulon (2003), reproduced with the permission of John
TW-CV-23 Saturated CV 2, 5, 10
Wiley Ltd.
F.L. Pellet et al. / Engineering Geology 157 (2013) 33–38 35
Water injection
2 MPa 5 MPa 10 MPa 12 MPa 16 MPa
0.4 0.02
–
Swelling [mm]
Dry discontinuity TD-CV-02 10.8 14.0 18.2 22.8
TD-CNL-03 14.3 – – – –
0.3 0
TD-CNL-04 11.9 – – –
Mean value 12.3 14.0 18.2 – 22.8
0.2 -0.02 Standard. dev. 1.8 – – – –
Saturated TW-CNL-07 18.1 13.9 12.1 – –
0.1 -0.04 discontinuity TW-CV-21 14.8 10.1 8.7 6.4 –
Mean value 16.5 12.0 10.4 6.4 –
Standard. dev. 2.3 2.7 2.4 – –
0 -0.06
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Time [minutes]
discontinuity test TW-CV-21 are presented in Fig. 4b; the values of
Fig. 3. Normal stress as a function of time for a displacement-controlled swelling test
the normal stiffness are less, as the rock material is softer due to
(test TW-CV-21).
the presence of water.
The secant normal stiffness kn of the discontinuities are summarized
presence of smectite, as it was previously demonstrated by Sato et al. in Table 3. They were computed on the unloading path of each cycle.
(1992). This indicates that for each stress level, the normal stiffness modulus
is the difference between the maximum normal stress attained and
3.2. Compression test zero (complete unloading) divided by the corresponding displacement
increment. Despite the fact that the values of the moduli are slightly
Fig. 4 shows the results of compression tests. Test TD-CV-02 was scattered, it can be seen that the normal stiffness substantially increases
performed with four different levels of normal stress (2, 5, 10 and with normal stress for the dry discontinuity. On the contrary, for the sat-
16 MPa) and the results are shown in Fig. 4a. After the first loading– urated discontinuity there is a slight decrease in stiffness.
unloading cycle (2 MPa), an irreversible displacement of about 0.2 mm These opposite trends can be explained by the fact that although the
was measured. The subsequent cycles lead to a larger irreversible discontinuities were considered to be smooth from a rock engineering
displacement, up to 1.2 mm for 16 MPa. Results for the saturated point of view, the specimen sawing left tiny marks rather like micro as-
perities. Therefore, the surface of the dry discontinuity is less even and a
a 18
16
a 8
σn = 16MPa
Normale stress [MPa]
14 6
σn = 10MPa
12
4 σ n = 5 MPa
Shear Stress [MPa]
10
2 σ n = 2 MPa
8
6 0
4 -2
2
-4
0
-3.5 -3.0 -2.5 -2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 -6
Normal displacement [mm] -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Shear displacement [mm]
b 18 b
0.0
16 Βn = 2 MPa
14
Normal displacement [mm]
Normal stress [MPa]
-0.2
Βn = 5 MPa
12
10 -0.4
Βn = 10MPa
8
-0.6 Βn = 16 MPa
6
4
-0.8
2
0 -1.0
-3.5 -3.0 -2.5 -2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Normal displacement [mm] Shear displacement [mm]
Fig. 4. Normal stress versus normal displacement for compression tests performed Fig. 5. Shear test TD-CNL-03 performed on a dry discontinuity under Constant Normal
prior to the shear test, a — dry discontinuity (test TD-CV-02), b — saturated interface Load (2, 5, 10 and 16 MPa): a — Shear stress versus shear displacement, b — normal
(TW-CV-21). displacement versus shear displacement.
36 F.L. Pellet et al. / Engineering Geology 157 (2013) 33–38
Table 4 a
Shear stiffness Ks [MPa/mm] and maximum shear stress τpeak [MPa] of dry discontinu- 8
ities for different normal stresses (2, 5, 10, 12, 16 MPa). σno = 12MPa
6 σno = 10MPa
2 MPa 5 MPa 10 MPa 12 MPa 16 MPa
σ no =5 MPa
4
-1.0
Six direct shear tests were conducted on a dry marl discontinuity.
-1.2
The shear test results giving the shear stress versus shear displacement 6 no =10MPa
and shear displacement versus normal displacement are shown in -1.4 6 no =12MPa
12
10
Normal stress [MPa]
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Shear displacement [mm]
Fig. 6. Photos of the dry discontinuity after testing (test TD-CNL-03). Left: lower part; Fig. 8. Normal stress versus shear displacement — test TD-CV-17 performed on a dry
right: upper part. discontinuity with Constant Volume (initial normal stress: 5, 10, and 12 MPa).
F.L. Pellet et al. / Engineering Geology 157 (2013) 33–38 37
Table 5
Shear stiffness Ks [MPa/mm] and maximum shear stress τpeak [MPa] of saturated dis-
continuities for different normal stresses (2, 5, 10, 12, 16 MPa).
a 6
σn= 16 MPa a 4
4
σn= 10 MPa σno= 10 MPa
σn = 5 MPa
Shear stress [MPa]
σno = 2 MPa
0 σno = 1 MPa
0
-2
-4
-2
-6
-8
-1 -4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Shear displacement [mm Shear displacement [mm]
b 0.0
σn= 5 MPa
b 0.0
σno = 1 MPa
σn= 2 MPa σno = 2 MPa
-0.5
Normal displacement [mm]
Normal displacement [mm]
-2.0
σno = 10 MPa
-1.5
-2.5
-3.0 -2.0
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Shear displacement [mm] Shear displacement [mm]
Fig. 9. Shear test TW-CNL-07 performed on a saturated discontinuity with initial nor- Fig. 11. Shear test TW-CV-23 (Constant Volume) performed on a saturated discontinu-
mal stresses of 5, 10, and 16 MPa: a — Shear stress versus shear displacement, b — normal ity with initial normal stresses of 2, 5, and 10 MPa: a — Shear stress versus shear dis-
displacement versus shear displacement. placement, b — normal displacement versus shear displacement.
38 F.L. Pellet et al. / Engineering Geology 157 (2013) 33–38
12
Despite the fact that additional tests would be needed to investi-
gate the effect of different water content and saturation ratios, the
10
strength reduction of the discontinuities, evidenced before, explains
Normal stress [MPa]
why the rock slope stability could be critical during the rainy season
8
or after the snow melting period. Moreover, the changes in stiffness
moduli enhance the acceleration of movements recorded in rock slopes
6
that are monitored. In this respect, some interesting correlations could
be achieved on case histories.
4
5. Conclusions
2
0
The mechanical properties of infilled-clay discontinuities are sub-
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 stantially changed by the humidity conditions (i.e. water content).
Shear Displacement [mm] Overall, the shear strength is considerably reduced when the water
content increases. Even if this conclusion is not surprising, it is impor-
Fig. 12. Normal stress versus shear displacement — test TW-CV-23 performed on satu- tant to accurately determine how much the strength of the material is
rated discontinuity with Constant Volume (initial normal stress: 2, 5, and 10 MPa).
reduced when its water content is increased. In the present study, the
shear strength of a dry discontinuity in a marl specimen is reduced by
approximately 50% when the discontinuity is saturated. This conclu-
4. Discussion on the effect of water content on the shear properties sion should help when performing stability analyses of rock slopes,
dam foundations or underground openings by taking into account
The observations described above outline a significant difference more realistic discontinuity shear strength parameters. Therefore in
between the behavior of dry and saturated discontinuities. the future, safer and more reliable designs could be achieved.
In terms of shear strength, the maximum shear stress versus normal
stress is presented in Fig. 13a for dry discontinuities and in Fig. 13b for References
saturated discontinuities. In both cases, it seems that the Mohr–Coulomb
Boulon, M., 1995. A 3D direct shear device for testing the mechanical behaviour and the
failure criterion is relevant, at least up to a normal stress of 10 MPa. Due hydraulic conductivity of rock joints. Second Int. Conf. on Mechanics of Jointed and
to the lubricant effect of water, the friction angle is much lower for the Faulted Rock MJFR-2, Vienne, Balkema ed. Rotterdam, Pays Bas, pp 407-413.
saturated discontinuities with a substantial drop from 22° for a dry dis- Buzzi, O., Hans, J., Boulon, M., Deleruyelle, F., Besnus, F., 2007. Hydromechanical study
of rock–mortar interfaces. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 32, 820–831.
continuity to 12° for the saturated discontinuity. At the same time cohe-
Cariou, S., Dormieux, L., Skoczylas, F., 2009. Swelling of a bentonite plug: a microcmechanical
sion slightly decreases from 0.41 MPa to 0.32 MPa. Additionally, both approach. In: Eberhardsteiner, J., et al. (Ed.), ECCOMAS Multidisciplinary Jubilee Sympo-
normal and shear stiffness moduli change considerably in the presence sium, Computational Methods in Applied Sciences.
Fabre, G., Pellet, F., 2006. Creep and time dependent damage in argillaceous rocks. In-
of water.
ternational Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 43, 950–960.
Fujii, Y., Ishijima, Y., Ichihara, Y., Kiyama, T., Kumakura, S., Takada, M., Sugawara, T.,
Narita, T., Kodama, J.I., Sawada, M., Nakata, E., 2011. Mechanical properties of aban-
a 8 doned and closed roadways in the Kushiro Coal Mine — Japan. International Jour-
nal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 48, 585–596.
Mohr-Coulomb
7 Hans, J., Boulon, M., 2003. A new device for investigating the hydro-mechanical proper-
Maximum shear stress [MPa]
TD-CNL-03
TD-CNL-04 ties of rock joints. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in
6 TD-CV-06 Geomechanics 27, 513–548.
TD-CV-02 Hendron Jr., A.J., Patton, F.D., 1987. The Vaiont slide — a geotechnical analysis based on
5 TD-CV-17
new geologic observations of the failure surface. Engineering Geology 24, 475–491.
TD-CV-05
Indraratna, B., Oliveira, D.A.F., Brown, E.T., 2010. A shear-displacement criterion for
4
soil-infilled rock discontinuities. Geotechnique 60, 623–633.
Jafari, M.K., Amini Hosseini, K., Pellet, F., Boulon, M., Buzzi, O., 2003. Evaluation of shear
3
strength of rock joints subjected to cyclic loading. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake
Engineering 23, 619–630.
2 Cohesion = 0.41 MPa
Friction angle= 22°
Li, D., Wong, L.N.Y., Liu, G., Zhang, X., 2012. Influence of water content and anisotropy
1 on the strength and deformability of low porosity meta-sedimentary rocks under
triaxial compression. Engineering Geology 126, 46–66.
0 Nara, Y., Morimoto, K., Yoneda, T., Hiroyoshi, N., Kaneko, K., 2011. Effects of humidity
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 and temperature on subcritical crack growth in sandstone. International Journal
Normal stress [MPa] of Solids and Structures 48, 1130–1140.
Nara, Y., Morimoto, K., Hiroyoshi, N., Yoneda, T., Kaneko, K., Benson, P.M., 2012. Influ-
ence of relative humidity on fracture toughness of rock: implications for subcritical
b 8
crack growth. International Journal of Solids and Structures 49, 2471–2481.
Mohr-Coulomb
7 Pellet, F., Fabre, G., 2007. Damage evaluation with P-wave velocity measurements dur-
Maximum shear stress [MPa]
TW-CNL-07
ing uniaxial compression tests on argillaceous rocks. International Journal of
TW-CV-21
6 Geomechanics, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) 7, 431–436.
TW-CV-23
Sato, T., Watanabe, T., Otsuka, R., 1992. Effects of layer charge, charge location, and energy
5 change on expansion properties of dioctahedral smectites. Clays and Clay Minerals
40, 103–113.
4
Vallier, F., Mitani, Y., Boulon, M., Esaki, T., Pellet, F., 2010. A new shear model for accounting
scale effect in rock joints behaviour. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 43, 581–595.
3
Zhang, Q., Shen, M., Ding, W., Clark, C., 2012. Shearing creep properties of cements with
2 different irregularities on two surfaces. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering 9,
210–217.
Cohesion = 0.32 MPa
1 Friction angle = 12 °
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Normal stress [MPa]
Fig. 13. Normal stress versus maximum shear stress, a — dry discontinuities, b — saturated
discontinuities.