Statement of Purpose

This study addresses the impacts of the conflict and displacement on people in the

Philippines, the families that are involved in Political Dynasty

The concerns raised to our Filipino's Citizens that their families are on different positions

in the Government Status. The purpose of this Issue is to give stand to those Filipino's that are

not involved in Political Dynasty. Many Government officials in the Philippines are involved in

Political Dynasty Families, Although political dynasties are not illegal and the people have their

own right to vote, the Anti Political Dynasty Bill should be enacted because political clans are

equated with corruption and are not fair in the way that their name can easily capture the minds

of the voters. although the very mention of political dynasties is enough to spark controversy and

criticism it can be inferred that the reason why political dynasties are so widespread in the

country right now is its ability to implement or bring forth new policies for the benefit of the

masses with ease. The presence of political dynasty isn’t that much opposition to proposed

policies especially in local governments. Let us say, a family holding different positions in the

local government agree in a single beneficial policy or program, it would serve the peoples best

interests since there is no time wasted in arguing over a single matter. Progress is maximized in

this manner. Another point to consider is that political dynasties reflect the voters’ preference.

The fact that political dynasties lasts for more than one generation only strengthens the reality

that political dynasties, amidst all the criticisms, manage to serve the best interests and well

being of the people. All the people who were in Edsa 1 know that the Aquinos are great

examples of politicians that serve best for the nation. They brought democracy to the people and

that is what the people wanted. People are powerful. They elected these officials. And that choice
is backed up with the belief that this politician could bring reform and progress. People could

elect someone else, someone who is not a part of the family but the fact that they did not, though

they had the capacity to do so suggest that like the current governance they are willing to elect

this official in office and give him or her another term for they believe that he/she has the

capacity to do what is best. If people believe that members of certain family can bring forth the