com
BAB 16
Efek dilusi dan Laba per Saham
Latihan konsep
Tema s pertanyaan singkat latihan masalah untuk Analisis
5. EPSA €”Menentukan surat 19, 20, 21 12, 13, 14 23, 24, 25, 5, 7
berharga yang berpotensi 26, 27, 28
dilutif.
Copyright  © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Menengah: IFRS Edition, Solusi manual 16-1
Untuk men-download lebih slide, ebook, solusi dan tes perbankan, kunjungi http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
Latihan
Tujuan Pembelajaran singkat latihan masalah
6. laba Hitung per saham dalam struktur modal yang 9, 10, 16, 17, 18, 19, 5, 8
sederhana 11, 15 20, 21, 22
7. laba Hitung per saham dalam struktur modal yang 12, 13, 14 23, 24, 25, 26, 4, 6, 7
kompleks. 27, 28, 29
16-2 Copyright  © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Menengah: IFRS Edition, Solusi manual
Untuk men-download lebih slide, ebook, solusi dan tes perbankan, kunjungi http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
Tingkat Waktu
Barang Deskripsi Kesulitan (menit)
E16-1 Penerbitan dan pembelian kembali obligasi konversi. Moderat 10A € “15
E16-2 Penerbitan dan pembelian kembali obligasi konversi. Moderat 15A € “20
E16-3 Penerbitan dan pembelian kembali obligasi konversi. Moderat 15A € “20
E16-4 Penerbitan, konversi, pembelian kembali obligasi konversi. Moderat 15A € “20
E16-5 Konversi obligasi. Sederhana 15A € “20
E16-6 Konversi obligasi. Sederhana 10A € “15
E16-7 Penerbitan dan konversi obligasi. Sederhana 15A € “20
E16-8 Penerbitan obligasi dengan waran. Sederhana 10A € “15
E16-9 Penerbitan obligasi dengan waran saham. Sederhana 10A € “15
E16-10 Penerbitan obligasi dengan waran saham. Moderat 15A € “20
E16-11 Penerbitan dan pelaksanaan opsi saham. Moderat 15A € “25
E16-12 Penerbitan, olahraga, dan perampasan opsi saham. Moderat 15A € “25
E16-13 Penerbitan, olahraga, dan berakhirnya opsi saham. Moderat 15A € “25
E16-14 Akuntansi untuk saham terbatas. Sederhana 10A € “15
E16-15 Akuntansi untuk saham terbatas. Sederhana 10A € “15
E16-16 Jumlah rata-rata tertimbang saham. Moderat 15A € “25
E16-17 EPS: struktur modal Simple. Sederhana 10A € “15
E16-18 EPS: struktur modal Simple. Sederhana 10A € “15
E16-19 EPS: struktur modal Simple. Sederhana 10A € “15
E16-20 EPS: struktur modal Simple. Sederhana 20A € “25
E16-21 EPS: struktur modal Simple. Sederhana 10A € “15
E16-22 EPS: struktur modal Simple. Sederhana 10A € “15
E16-23 EPS dengan obligasi konversi, berbagai situasi. Kompleks 20A € “25
E16-24 EPS dengan obligasi konversi. Moderat 15A € “20
E16-25 EPS dengan obligasi konversi dan saham preferen. Moderat 20A € “25
E16-26 EPS dengan obligasi konversi dan saham preferen. Moderat 10A € “15
E16-27 EPS dengan pilihan, berbagai situasi. Moderat 20A € “25
E16-28 EPS dengan perjanjian penerbitan kontingen. Sederhana 10A € “15
E16-29 EPS dengan waran. Moderat 15A € “20
*E16-30 hak saham-apresiasi. Moderat 15A € “25
*E16-31 hak saham-apresiasi. Moderat 15A € “25
Copyright  © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Menengah: IFRS Edition, Solusi manual 16-3
Untuk men-download lebih slide, ebook, solusi dan tes perbankan, kunjungi http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
JAWABAN PERTANYAAN
1. Efek seperti konversi hutang atau saham pilihan yang dilutif karena fitur mereka menunjukkan bahwa
pemegang surat berharga dapat menjadi pemegang saham. Ketika saham biasa yang dikeluarkan, akan ada reductionâ
€”dilutionâ €” laba per saham.
2. Perusahaan menerbitkan obligasi konversi karena dua alasan. Salah satunya adalah untuk meningkatkan modal tanpa memberikan
up kontrol kepemilikan lebih dari yang diperlukan. Alasan kedua adalah untuk mendapatkan pembiayaan dengan harga lebih murah. Hak konversi
menarik investor bersedia menerima tingkat bunga yang lebih rendah dari pada masalah utang lurus.
3. utang konversi dan utang yang diterbitkan dengan waran saham adalah serupa bahwa: (1) kedua memungkinkan penerbit untuk
mengeluarkan utang dengan biaya bunga yang lebih rendah dari umumnya akan tersedia untuk utang lurus; (2) kedua memungkinkan
pemegang untuk membeli saham issuerâ € ™ s kurang dari nilai pasar jika saham menghargai cukup di masa depan; (3) menyediakan
baik pemegang perlindungan keamanan utang jika nilai saham tidak menghargai; dan (4) keduanya adalah surat berharga yang kompleks
yang mengandung unsur utang dan ekuitas pada saat masalah.
4. Perlakuan akuntansi dari ¬ 160.000 â € • sweetenerâ € - untuk menginduksi konversi obligasi menjadi saham biasa merupakan
keberangkatan dari IFRS karena IASB memandang transaksi sebagai pensiun dari utang. Oleh karena itu, IASB mensyaratkan bahwa â
€ • sweetenerâ € - dari ¬ 160.000 dilaporkan sebagai beban.
5. (A) Dari sudut pandang penerbit, fitur konversi hasil utang konversi di bawah
biaya bunga tunai daripada dalam kasus utang nonconvertible. Selain itu, emiten dalam perencanaan pembiayaan jangka
panjang yang dapat melihat utang konversi sebagai sarana meningkatkan modal ekuitas dalam jangka panjang. Dengan
demikian, jika nilai pasar dari saham yang mendasari meningkatkan cukup setelah masalah utang, penerbit biasanya
dapat memaksa konversi utang konversi menjadi saham dengan memanggil masalah untuk penebusan. Di bawah kondisi
pasar, penerbit secara efektif dapat menghilangkan utang. Di sisi lain, jika nilai pasar saham tidak meningkat cukup untuk
menghasilkan konversi utang, penerbit akan menerima manfaat dari hasil uang tunai untuk tanggal jatuh tempo yang
dijadwalkan pada biaya bunga tunai yang relatif rendah.
(B) Pembeli memperoleh opsi untuk menerima baik jumlah wajah utang saat jatuh tempo atau
jumlah tertentu saham pada konversi. Jika nilai pasar dari saham yang mendasari meningkatkan di atas harga konversi,
pembeli (baik melalui konversi atau melalui memegang utang konversi yang berisi opsi konversi) menerima manfaat
apresiasi. Di sisi lain, harus nilai saham perusahaan yang mendasari tidak meningkat, pembeli bisa tetap mengharapkan
untuk menerima pokok dan bunga (lebih rendah).
6. Pandangan bahwa pengakuan akuntansi yang terpisah harus diberikan fitur konversi
utang konversi didasarkan pada premis bahwa ada nilai ekonomi yang melekat dalam fitur konversi atau panggilan pada saham
biasa dan bahwa nilai fitur ini harus diakui untuk tujuan akuntansi oleh penerbit. Dapat dikatakan bahwa panggilan tidak berbeda
secara signifikan di alam dari panggilan yang terkandung dalam pilihan atau perintah dan masalah yang demikian merupakan
jenis transaksi modal. Fakta bahwa fitur konversi berdampingan dengan karakteristik keamanan senior tertentu dalam
keamanan kompleks dan tidak dapat dipisahkan secara fisik dari unsur-unsur tersebut atau dari instrumen tidak merupakan
alasan logis atau kuat mengapa nilai-nilai dari berbagai elemen seharusnya tidak menerima pengakuan akuntansi yang terpisah.
Fakta bahwa hasil akhir dari pilihan yang diberikan pembeli dari utang konversi tidak dapat ditentukan pada tanggal penerbitan
tidak relevan dengan pertanyaan efektif mencerminkan dalam akuntansi mencatat berbagai elemen dari dokumen yang
kompleks pada tanggal penerbitan. Fitur konversi memiliki nilai pada tanggal penerbitan dan harus diakui. Selain itu, kesulitan
implementasi tidak dapat diatasi dan tidak boleh diandalkan untuk memerintah kesimpulan.
16-4 Copyright  © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Menengah: IFRS Edition, Solusi manual
Untuk men-download lebih slide, ebook, solusi dan tes perbankan, kunjungi http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
7. Metode yang digunakan oleh perusahaan untuk mencatat pertukaran obligasi konversi untuk biasa
Saham dapat didukung dengan alasan bahwa ketika perusahaan mengeluarkan obligasi konversi, hasil bisa mewakili
pertimbangan diterima untuk saham. Karena itu, ketika konversi terjadi, nilai buku dari kewajiban hanya dipindahkan ke saham
dipertukarkan untuk itu. pembenaran selanjutnya adalah bahwa konversi merupakan transaksi dengan pemegang saham yang
tidak harus menimbulkan laba atau rugi.
Di sisi lain, merekam isu saham biasa pada nilai buku dari surat utang terbuka untuk pertanyaan. Dapat dikatakan bahwa
pertukaran saham untuk surat utang melengkapi siklus transaksi untuk obligasi dan memulai siklus baru untuk saham.
Pertimbangan atau nilai yang digunakan untuk siklus ini transaksi baru maka harus jumlah yang akan diterima jika obligasi dijual
daripada ditukar, atau jumlah yang akan diterima jika saham yang terkait dijual, mana yang lebih jelas ditentukan pada saat itu
pertukaran. Metode ini mengakui perubahan nilai yang telah terjadi dan bawahan pertimbangan ditentukan pada saat obligasi
diterbitkan.
9. Jika sebuah perusahaan memutuskan untuk menerbitkan saham baru, pemegang saham lama umumnya memiliki hak, disebut sebagai hak
saham, untuk membeli saham baru yang dikeluarkan sebanding dengan kepemilikan mereka. Tidak ada entri diperlukan bila hak yang
dikeluarkan untuk pemegang saham yang ada. Hanya entri memorandum diperlukan untuk menunjukkan bahwa hak-hak telah dikeluarkan. Jika
dilakukan, korporasi hanya mendebit Cash sebesar pinjaman yang diterima, credits Berbagi Capitalâ €”Biasa untuk nilai nominal, dan perbedaan
dicatat dengan kredit untuk Berbagi Premiumâ €” Biasa.
10. Perusahaan dituntut untuk menggunakan metode nilai wajar untuk mengenali biaya kompensasi. Bagi kebanyakan share
Opsi berencana biaya kompensasi diukur pada tanggal pemberian dan dialokasikan untuk biaya selama masa bakti, yang biasanya
berakhir pada tanggal vesting.
11. Gordero akan menjelaskan diskon sebagai pengurang dari hasil uang tunai dan peningkatan
beban kompensasi. IASB menyimpulkan bahwa manfaat ini merupakan kompensasi karyawan.
12. Profesi merekomendasikan bahwa nilai wajar dari opsi saham ditentukan pada tanggal dimana
opsi tersebut diberikan kepada individu tertentu.
Pada tanggal opsi tersebut diberikan, korporasi foregoes alternatif menjual saham pada harga maka yang berlaku. Harga pasar
pada tanggal hibah dapat dianggap menjadi nilai yang majikan ada dalam pikiran. Ini adalah nilai opsi pada tanggal pemberian,
daripada grantorâ € ™ s keuntungan utama atau kerugian atas transaksi, yang untuk tujuan akuntansi merupakan kompensasi
apapun pemberi berniat untuk membayar.
13. IFRS mensyaratkan bahwa beban kompensasi diakui selama periode layanan. Kecuali ditentukan lain, periode layanan adalah
vesting periodâ €”waktu antara tanggal pemberian dan tanggal vesting.
14. Menggunakan pendekatan nilai wajar, biaya kompensasi total dihitung berdasarkan nilai wajar
pilihan pada tanggal opsi diberikan kepada karyawan. nilai wajar diestimasi dengan menggunakan model penentuan harga opsi yang
dapat diterima (seperti Black-Scholes option pricing model).
Copyright  © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Menengah: IFRS Edition, Solusi manual 16-5
Untuk men-download lebih slide, ebook, solusi dan tes perbankan, kunjungi http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
15. Keuntungan menggunakan saham dibatasi untuk mengkompensasi karyawan adalah: (1) saham terbatas tidak pernah menjadi benar-benar
tidak berharga; (2) mereka umumnya menghasilkan kurang dilusi dari opsi saham; dan (3) mereka lebih menyelaraskan insentif karyawan
dengan perusahaan insentif.
17. Perhitungan jumlah rata-rata tertimbang saham mengharuskan penyajian kembali saham
luar biasa sebelum dividen saham atau split. Saham tambahan yang luar biasa sebagai hasil dari dividen saham atau
perpecahan diasumsikan telah beredar sejak awal tahun. Saham yang beredar sebelum dividen saham atau split disesuaikan
sehingga saham tersebut dinyatakan atas dasar yang sama seperti saham yang dikeluarkan setelah share dividen / split.
18. (A) Laba per saham dasar adalah jumlah pendapatan untuk periode yang tersedia untuk setiap biasa
berbagi beredar selama periode pelaporan.
(B) keamanan yang berpotensi dilutif adalah keamanan yang dapat ditukar atau dikonversi menjadi biasa
saham dan karena itu pada konversi atau latihan bisa encer (atau menurunkan) laba per saham. Termasuk dalam kategori
ini adalah obligasi konversi, opsi, waran, dan hak-hak lainnya.
(C) Laba per saham dilusian adalah jumlah pendapatan untuk periode yang tersedia untuk setiap biasa
saham yang beredar dan untuk setiap saham yang akan menjadi luar biasa dengan asumsi penerbitan saham biasa
untuk semua efek berpotensi saham biasa dilutif selama periode pelaporan.
(D) struktur modal yang kompleks ada setiap kali struktur modal companyâ € ™ s termasuk dilutif
sekuritas.
(E) saham biasa Potensi tidak saham biasa dalam bentuk tetapi memungkinkan pemegang untuk memperoleh
saham biasa pada olahraga atau konversi.
19. obligasi konversi adalah efek berpotensi dilutif dan bagian dari laba per saham dilusian jika mereka
konversi meningkatkan EPS pembilang kurang dari itu meningkatkan EPS denominator; yaitu, EPS setelah konversi kurang
dari EPS sebelum konversi.
20. Konsep bahwa keamanan mungkin menjadi setara dengan saham biasa telah berkembang untuk memenuhi
melaporkan kebutuhan investor di perusahaan yang telah mengeluarkan beberapa jenis obligasi konversi, opsi, dan waran. Sebuah
keamanan yang berpotensi dilutif adalah keamanan yang tidak, dalam bentuk, saham biasa tetapi yang memungkinkan pemegangnya
untuk mendapatkan saham biasa pada olahraga atau konversi. Para pemegang efek tersebut dapat mengharapkan untuk berpartisipasi
dalam apresiasi nilai saham biasa yang dihasilkan terutama dari pendapatan dan potensi pendapatan dari perusahaan penerbitan.
Partisipasi ini pada dasarnya adalah sama dengan pemegang saham umum kecuali bahwa keamanan dapat membawa dividen
ditentukan menghasilkan return yang berbeda dari yang diterima oleh pemegang saham umum. Daya tarik untuk investor dari jenis
keamanan sering didasarkan terutama atas hak potensi ini untuk berbagi dalam peningkatan pendapatan potensial dari perusahaan
penerbitan daripada setelah kembali tetap atau pada karakteristik keamanan senior lainnya. Selain itu, karakteristik panggilan dari opsi
saham dan waran memberikan investor kontrol potensial atas sejumlah jauh lebih besar dari saham per dolar dari investasi
dibandingkan jika investor memiliki saham langsung.
16-6 Copyright  © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Menengah: IFRS Edition, Solusi manual
Untuk men-download lebih slide, ebook, solusi dan tes perbankan, kunjungi http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
21. efek konversi dianggap sekuritas berpotensi dilutif setiap kali konversi mereka
akan menurunkan laba per saham. Jika situasi ini tidak mengakibatkan, konversi tidak dianggap dan hanya EPS dasar
dilaporkan.
22. Berdasarkan metode treasury saham, laba per saham dilusian harus ditentukan seakan luar biasa
Pilihan dan waran yang dilaksanakan pada awal tahun (atau tanggal masalah jika kemudian) dan dana yang diperoleh dengan
demikian digunakan untuk membeli saham biasa pada harga pasar rata-rata untuk periode tersebut. Sebagai contoh, jika
sebuah perusahaan memiliki 10.000 waran yang beredar dieksekusi pada $ 54, dan harga pasar rata-rata dari saham biasa
selama periode yang dilaporkan adalah $ 60, $ 540.000 yang akan diwujudkan dari pelaksanaan waran dan penerbitan 10.000
saham akan menjadi jumlah yang cukup untuk mengakuisisi 9.000 saham; dengan demikian, 1.000 saham akan ditambahkan
ke saham biasa yang beredar dalam menghitung laba per saham dilusian untuk periode tersebut. Namun, untuk menghindari
efek positif tambahan pada laba per saham,
23. Ya, jika waran atau opsi yang hadir, peningkatan harga pasar dari saham biasa dapat
meningkatkan jumlah saham biasa yang berpotensi dilusi dengan mengurangi jumlah saham repurchasable. Selain itu,
peningkatan harga pasar saham biasa dapat meningkatkan beban kompensasi yang dilaporkan dalam rencana hak apresiasi
saham. Hal ini akan menurunkan laba bersih dan, akibatnya, laba per saham.
24. Antidilution adalah peningkatan laba per saham yang berasal dari asumsi bahwa konversi
sekuritas telah dikonversi atau bahwa pilihan dan waran sudah, atau saham lain telah diterbitkan pada pemenuhan kondisi
tertentu. Misalnya, kondisi antidilutive akan ada ketika dividen atau persyaratan bunga (setelah dikurangi pajak) dari keamanan
convertible melebihi EPS saat ini dikalikan dengan jumlah saham biasa dapat dikeluarkan setelah konversi keamanan. Hal ini
dapat digambarkan dengan asumsi perusahaan dalam situasi berikut:
$ 13.600
Laba per saham dengan asumsi konversi = = $ 0,54
20.000 + 5.000
Efek antidilutive ini terjadi karena bunga obligasi (setelah dikurangi pajak) dari $ 3.600 lebih besar dari EPS saat ini $ 0,50
dikalikan dengan jumlah saham dapat dikeluarkan setelah konversi obligasi (5.000 saham).
25. Kedua laba per saham dasar dan laba per saham dilusian harus disajikan dalam modal kompleks
struktur. Ketika operasi dihentikan dilaporkan, per saham dalam jumlah harus ditampilkan untuk pendapatan dari operasi yang
dilanjutkan, dan laba bersih.
26. IFRS dan US GAAP secara substansial sama dalam akuntansi untuk kompensasi berbasis saham. Sebagai contoh, kedua
IFRS dan US GAAP mengikuti model yang sama untuk mengakui kompensasi berbasis saham. Artinya, nilai wajar saham dan
opsi diberikan kepada karyawan diakui selama periode dimana jasa employeesâ € ™ berhubungan.
Copyright  © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Menengah: IFRS Edition, Solusi manual 16-7
Untuk men-download lebih slide, ebook, solusi dan tes perbankan, kunjungi http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
27. (A) Berdasarkan IFRS, Norman harus â € • bifurcateâ € - (membagi) yang Componenta ekuitas €”nilai konversi
optiona €”dari obligasi. Di bawah iGAAP, obligasi konversi dicatat sebagai berikut.
(B) Norman membuat entri berikut untuk mencatat penerbitan di bawah US GAAP.
(C) IFRS memberikan representasi yang lebih setia dampak dari obligasi, dengan merekam secara terpisah utang dan
ekuitas komponennya. Namun, ada kekhawatiran tentang keandalan model yang digunakan untuk memperkirakan porsi
ekuitas obligasi.
*28.
28. Antidilution ketika beberapa sekuritas yang terlibat ditentukan oleh peringkat surat berharga untuk
mungkin dilusi maksimal dalam hal efek per saham. Dimulai dengan yang paling dilutif, laba per saham berkurang sampai salah
satu sekuritas mempertahankan atau laba meningkat per saham. Ketika peningkatan laba per saham terjadi, keamanan yang
menyebabkan peningkatan laba per saham dikecualikan. Perhitungan sebelumnya oleh karena itu disediakan pengenceran
maksimal.
16-8 Copyright  © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Menengah: IFRS Edition, Solusi manual
Untuk men-download lebih slide, ebook, solusi dan tes perbankan, kunjungi http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
Copyright  © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Menengah: IFRS Edition, Solusi manual 16-9
Untuk men-download lebih slide, ebook, solusi dan tes perbankan, kunjungi http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
16-10 Copyright  © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Menengah: IFRS Edition, Solusi manual
Untuk men-download lebih slide, ebook, solusi dan tes perbankan, kunjungi http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
(B) 330.000 (The 30.000 saham yang diterbitkan dalam dividen saham diasumsikan out
berdiri dari awal tahun.)
Copyright  © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Menengah: IFRS Edition, Solusi manual 16-11
Untuk men-download lebih slide, ebook, solusi dan tes perbankan, kunjungi http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
$ 300.000
EPS terdilusi = = $ 1,40
200.000 + 15.000
16-12 Copyright  © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Menengah: IFRS Edition, Solusi manual
Untuk men-download lebih slide, ebook, solusi dan tes perbankan, kunjungi http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
Copyright  © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Menengah: IFRS Edition, Solusi manual 16-13
Untuk men-download lebih slide, ebook, solusi dan tes perbankan, kunjungi http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
* ¬ 1.940.000 â € “ ¬ 1.900.000 (Nilai wajar obligasi konversi (baik kewajiban dan ekuitas
komponen dikurangi dengan nilai wajar dari komponen kewajiban). Sisa di akun ini bisa
ditransfer untuk Berbagi Premiumâ €”Biasa.
* *¬
¬ 1.928.665 â € “ ¬ 1.900.000 (Angela memiliki keuntungan karena jumlah pembelian kembali
komponen kewajiban kurang dari nilai tercatat komponen kewajiban.)
16-14 Copyright  © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Menengah: IFRS Edition, Solusi manual
Untuk men-download lebih slide, ebook, solusi dan tes perbankan, kunjungi http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
Penyesuaian ekuitas:
nilai wajar obligasi konversi
(Dengan kedua kewajiban dan ekuitas) ....................... Â ¥ 112.000
Kurang: komponen Kewajiban ............................... 110.413
Penyesuaian untuk Berbagi Premiumâ €”Konversi Ekuitas
......................................... Â ¥ 1.587
Copyright  © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Menengah: IFRS Edition, Solusi manual 16-15
Untuk men-download lebih slide, ebook, solusi dan tes perbankan, kunjungi http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
Penyesuaian ekuitas:
nilai wajar obligasi konversi
(Dengan kedua kewajiban dan ekuitas) ....................... $ 55.500
Kurang: komponen Kewajiban ............................... 54.000
Penyesuaian untuk Berbagi Premiumâ €”Ekuitas Konversi
.......................................... .................... $ 1.500
16-16 Copyright  © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Menengah: IFRS Edition, Solusi manual
Untuk men-download lebih slide, ebook, solusi dan tes perbankan, kunjungi http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
Copyright  © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Menengah: IFRS Edition, Solusi manual 16-17
Untuk men-download lebih slide, ebook, solusi dan tes perbankan, kunjungi http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
(B) Bahkan jika waran yang nondetachable, yang masuk dalam (a) akan sama.
Setiap utang yang diterbitkan dengan waran dianggap sebagai instrumen senyawa untuk tujuan
akuntansi.
LIN PERUSAHAAN
Journal Entri September
1, 2010
Jadwal 1
Jadwal 2
bunga yang masih harus dibayar selama 3 bulan â € “(Â ¥ 24.000.000 X 3/12) ............ Â ¥ 6.000.000
16-18 Copyright  © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Menengah: IFRS Edition, Solusi manual
Untuk men-download lebih slide, ebook, solusi dan tes perbankan, kunjungi http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
Copyright  © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Menengah: IFRS Edition, Solusi manual 16-19
Untuk men-download lebih slide, ebook, solusi dan tes perbankan, kunjungi http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
( Catatan untuk instruktur : Harga pasar saham tidak memiliki relevansi dalam entri sebelum dan
satu berikut).
Catatan : Ada 5.000 pilihan yang belum dieksekusi pada 3/31/12 (20.000 â € “3000 â €“12.000).
16-20 Copyright  © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Menengah: IFRS Edition, Solusi manual
Untuk men-download lebih slide, ebook, solusi dan tes perbankan, kunjungi http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
Copyright  © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Menengah: IFRS Edition, Solusi manual 16-21
Untuk men-download lebih slide, ebook, solusi dan tes perbankan, kunjungi http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
Cara lain untuk melihat transaksi ini adalah bahwa 2.400.000 saham pada awal tahun harus
disajikan kembali untuk dividen saham terlepas dari mana pada tahun dividen saham terjadi.
Cara lain untuk melihat transaksi ini adalah bahwa 4.640.000 saham pada awal tahun harus
disajikan kembali untuk pemecahan saham terlepas dari mana pada tahun perpecahan saham
terjadi.
16-22 Copyright  © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Menengah: IFRS Edition, Solusi manual
Untuk men-download lebih slide, ebook, solusi dan tes perbankan, kunjungi http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
(Sebuah)
tanggal saham Pecahan Saham
Peristiwa Posisi Penyajian luar biasa Tahun tertimbang
 ¥ 3256000000 â € “ ¥ 900.000
(C) Laba per Saham = = Â ¥ 1,678.75
1.939.000
 ¥ 3688000000 =  ¥ 1,902.01
1.939.000
b  ¥ (432.000.000) =  ¥ 222,80
1.939.000
Copyright  © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Menengah: IFRS Edition, Solusi manual 16-23
Untuk men-download lebih slide, ebook, solusi dan tes perbankan, kunjungi http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
16-24 Copyright  © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Menengah: IFRS Edition, Solusi manual
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
Income data:
Income from continuing operations .................................... $15,000,000
Deduct 6% dividend on preference shares ......................... 300,000
Ordinary share income from discontinued operations ...... 14,700,000
Deduct discontinued operations loss, net of tax ............... 1,340,000
Net income available for ordinary shareholders ................ $13,360,000
Copyright  © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Menengah: IFRS Edition, Solusi manual 16-25
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
€ 300,000 – income tax of € 120,000 – preference dividends of € 60,000 (6% of € 1,000,000) = € 120,000
(income available to ordinary shareholders)
16-26 Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Intermediate: IFRS Edition, Solutions Manual
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
$1,897 + (1 – .40)($5,938)
= $5,460 = $.57
2,000 + (2,500 X 1/2 yr.) + 5,000 + (2,500 X 1/2) 9,500
Note : The answer is the same as (a). In both (a) and (c), the bonds are assumed converted for the
entire year.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Intermediate: IFRS Edition, Solutions Manual 16-27
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
[ Note to instructor : In this problem, the earnings per share computed for basic earnings per share
is € 1.23 ( € 1,540,000 ÷ 1,250,000) and the diluted earnings per share is € 1.23. As a result, only one
earnings per share number would be presented.]
16-28 Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Intermediate: IFRS Edition, Solutions Manual
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
(b) If the convertible security were preference shares, basic EPS would be
the same assuming there were no preference dividends declared or the preference shares
were noncumulative. For diluted EPS, the numerator would be the net income amount of
$7,500,000 and the denominator would be 2,072,000.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Intermediate: IFRS Edition, Solutions Manual 16-29
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
* $1,000,000 ÷ $100
Note : Preference dividends are not deducted since preference shares were assumed
converted into ordinary shares.
(a) Diluted
Shares assumed issued on exercise ...................................... 1,000
Proceeds (1,000 X £8 = £8,000) ............................................... Less: Treasury
shares purchased (£8,000/£20) .................... 400
Incremental shares .......................................................... 600
£40,000
Diluted EPS = = £3.77 (rounded)
10,000 + 600
(b) Diluted
Shares assumed issued on exercise ...................................... 1,000
Proceeds = £8,000
Less: Treasury shares purchased (£8,000/£20) .................... 400
600
X 3/12
Incremental shares .................................................................. 150
£40,000
Diluted EPS = = £3.94 (rounded)
10,000 + 150
16-30 Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Intermediate: IFRS Edition, Solutions Manual
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
(a) The contingent shares would have to be reflected in diluted earnings per
share because the earnings level is currently being attained.
(b) Because the earnings level is not being currently attained, contingent
shares are not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share.
(a) Diluted
The warrants are dilutive because the option price ($10) is less
than the average market price ($15).
OR
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Intermediate: IFRS Edition, Solutions Manual 16-31
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
Cumulative
Fair Compensation Percentage Compensation Expense Expense Expense Expense
Date Value Recognizable Accrued Accrued to Date 2008 2009 2010 2011
Cumulative Compensation
Fair Compensation Percentage Accrued to Expense Expense Expense Expense Expense
Date Value Recognizable Accrued Date 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
(b)
2009
Compensation Expense .................................................................... 60,000
Liability Under Share Appreciation Plan ................................... 60,000
2012
Liability Under Share Appreciation Plan .......................................... 130,000
Compensation Expense ............................................................. 130,000
2013
Compensation Expense .................................................................... 400,000
Liability Under Share Appreciation Plan ................................... 400,000
16-33
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
16-34 Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Intermediate: IFRS Edition, Solutions Manual
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEMS
PROBLEM 16-1
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Intermediate: IFRS Edition, Solutions Manual 16-35
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
(b) Equity:
Calculations :
Share Capital Share Premium
At beginning of year .......................... 300,000 shares € 600,000
From share rights (entry #3) ............. 9,500 shares 209,000
From share warrants (entry #4) ........ 1,600 shares 44,800
From share options (entry #6) .......... 9,000 shares 270,000
Total ............................................ 320,100 shares € 1,123,800
16-36 Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Intermediate: IFRS Edition, Solutions Manual
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
PROBLEM 16-2
2009 No journal entry would be recorded at the time the share option plan
was adopted. However, a memorandum entry in the journal might be made on November
30, 2009, indicating that a share option plan had authorized the future granting to officers
of options to buy 70,000 shares of $5 par value common stock at $9 a share.
2010 January 2
No entry
December 31
Compensation Expense .................................... 88,000
Share Premium—Share Options ............... 88,000
(To record compensation expense attributable
to 2010—22,000 options at $4)
2011 December 31
Compensation Expense .................................... 80,000
Share Premium—Share Options ............... 80,000
(To record compensation expense attributable
to 2011—20,000 options at $4)
2012 December 31
Cash (20,000 X $9) ............................................. 180,000
Share Premium—Share Options
(20,000 X $4) ................................................. 80,000
Share Capital—Ordinary (20,000 X $5) ..... 100,000
Share Premium—Ordinary ........................ 160,000
(To record issuance of 20,000 shares of $5 par
value stock upon exercise of options at option
price of $9)
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Intermediate: IFRS Edition, Solutions Manual 16-37
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
PROBLEM 16-3
(c) No change for part (a), unless the fair value of the options change.
16-38 Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Intermediate: IFRS Edition, Solutions Manual
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
PROBLEM 16-4
The computation of Fitzgerald Pharmaceutical Industries’ basic earnings per share and the diluted
earnings per share for the fiscal year ended June 30,
2010, are shown below.
= $1,500,000 – $75,000 1
1,000,000
= $1,425,000
1,000,000
= $75,000
= $1,695,000
1,300,000
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Intermediate: IFRS Edition, Solutions Manual 16-39
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
outstanding
Proceeds from exercise of options
(200,000 X $15) .......................................................... $3,000,000
16-40 Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Intermediate: IFRS Edition, Solutions Manual
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
PROBLEM 16-5
(a) Melton Corporation has a simple capital structure since it does not have
any potentially dilutive securities.
(b) The weighted-average number of shares that Melton Corporation would use
in calculating earnings per share for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2010, and May 31, 2011, is
1,600,000 and 2,200,000 respectively, calculated as follows:
2010 2011
Income from operations .......................................... $1,800,000 $2,500,000
Interest expense 1 ..................................................... 240,000 240,000
Income from continuing operations before
taxes ...................................................................... 1,560,000 2,260,000
Income taxes at 40% ................................................ 624,000 904,000
Income from continuing operations ....................... 936,000 1,356,000
Discontinued operations loss, net of income
taxes of $240,000 .................................................. 360,000
Net income ............................................................... $ 936,000 $ 996,000
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Intermediate: IFRS Edition, Solutions Manual 16-41
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
= $240,000
= ($936,000 – $60,000*)
1,600,000
= $360,000
2,200,000
= $996,000 – $60,000
2,200,000
= $.43
16-42 Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Intermediate: IFRS Edition, Solutions Manual
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
PROBLEM 16-6
(a) The number of shares used to compute basic earnings per share is
4,951,000, as calculated below.
(b) The number of shares used to compute diluted earnings per share is
5,791,000, as shown below.
(c) The adjusted net income to be used as the numerator in the basic earnings
per share calculation for the year ended December 31, 2011, is $10,350,000, as computed
below.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Intermediate: IFRS Edition, Solutions Manual 16-43
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
PROBLEM 16-7
* $6,000,000 ÷ $10
= $1,057,200
675,000
a Preference shares are not assumed converted since conversion would be antidilutive. That
is, conversion of the preference shares increases the numerator $240,000 ($4,000,000 X .06)
and the denominator 120,000 shares [(4,000,000 ÷ 100) X 3]
Market price
16-44 Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Intermediate: IFRS Edition, Solutions Manual
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
PROBLEM 16-8
2011 2010
Income from continuing operations before $1,400,000 $660,000
taxes ...................................................................
Income taxes ......................................................... 560,000 264,000
Income from continuing operations .................... 840,000 396,000
Discontinued operations loss,
less applicable income taxes of $160,000 ........ 240,000
Net income ............................................................. $ 600,000 $396,000
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Intermediate: IFRS Edition, Solutions Manual 16-45
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
The basic earnings per share computation uses only the weightedaverage of the
ordinary shares outstanding. The diluted earnings per share computation assumes the
conversion or exercise of all potentially dilutive securities that are not antidilutive.
16-46 Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Intermediate: IFRS Edition, Solutions Manual
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Intermediate: IFRS Edition, Solutions Manual 16-47
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
CA 16-1
(1) Both convertible debt and debt issued with share warrants are accounted for as compound
instruments. IFRS requires that compound instruments be separated into their liability and equity components.
Debt issued with warrants is considered a compound instrument whether the share warrants are detachable or non-detachable.
(2) Companies are not permitted to adjust compensation expense when share options become worthless
because the share price does not rise since market conditions are reflected in the determination of fair value at the grant date.
(3) The treasury-share method is used to include options and warrants in EPS computations. The proceeds from the assumed
exercise of the options or warrants are assumed used to acquire treasury shares at the market price.
(4) Companies report compensation expense for employees share purchase plans because the cost of
employee services must be measured as the services are performed. The total compensation cost is allocated to the periods
benefited by employees’ services.
The employee shares in any dividends paid by the company and can sell the shares if/when the price of the shares goes up.
CA 16-2
(a) Devers recognizes that altering the estimate will benefit Adkins and other executive officers of the
company. Current shareholders and investors will be forced to pay out the bonuses, with the altered estimate as a critical factor.
(b) The accountant’s decision should not be based on the existence of the compensation plan.
CA 16-3
(a) 1. The objective of issuing warrants to existing shareholders on a pro-rata basis is to raise new equity capital. This method
of raising equity capital may be used because of preemptive rights on the part of a company’s shareholders and also
because it is likely to be less expensive than a public offering.
2. The purpose of issuing share warrants to certain key employees, usually in the form of a nonqualified share option plan,
is to increase their interest in the long-term growth and income of the company and to attract new management talent.
Also, this issuance of share warrants to key employees under a share-option plan frequently constitutes an important
element in a company’s executive compensation program. Though such plans result in some dilution of the shareholders’
equity when shares are issued, the plans provide an additional incentive to the key employees to operate the company
efficiently.
3. Warrants to purchase its ordinary shares may be issued to purchasers of a company’s bonds in order to stimulate the sale of
the bonds by increasing their speculative appeal and aiding in overcoming the objection that rising price levels cause
money invested for long periods in bonds to lose purchasing power. The use of warrants in this connection may also
permit the sale of the bonds at a lower interest cost.
16-48 Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Intermediate: IFRS Edition, Solutions Manual
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
CA 16-3 (Continued)
(b) 1. Because the purpose of issuing warrants to existing shareholders is to raise new equity capital, the price specified in the
warrants must be sufficiently below the current market price to reasonably assure that they will be exercised. Because
the success of the offering depends entirely on the current market price of the company’s shares in relation to the
exercise price of the warrants, and because the objective is to raise capital, the length of time over which the warrants
can be exercised is very short, frequently 60 days.
2. Warrants may be offered to key employees below, at, or above the market price of the shares on the day the rights are
granted except for incentive share-option plans. If a share-option plan is to provide a strong incentive, warrants that can
be exercised shortly after they are granted and expire, say, within two or three years, usually must be exercisable at or
near the market price at the date of the grant. Warrants that cannot be exercised for a number of years after they are
granted or those that do not lapse for a number of years after they become exercisable may, however, be priced
somewhat above the market price of the shares at the date of the grant without eliminating the incentive feature. This
does not upset the principal objective of share option plans, heightening the interest of key employees in the long-term
success of the company.
3. Income tax laws impose no restrictions on the exercise price of warrants issued to purchasers of a company’s bonds. The
exercise price may be above, equal to, or below the current market price of the company’s shares. The longer the period
of time during which the warrant can be exercised, however, the higher the exercise price can be and still stimulate the
sale of the bonds because of the increased speculation appeal. Thus, the significance of the length of time over which the
warrants can be exercised depends largely on the exercise price (or prices). A low exercise price in combination with a
short exercise period can be just as successful as a high exercise price in combination with a long exercise period.
(c) 1. Financial statement information concerning outstanding share warrants issued to a company’s shareholders should
include a description of the shares being offered for sale, the option price, the time period during which the rights may be
exercised, and the number of rights needed to purchase a new share.
2. Financial statement information concerning share warrants issued to key employees should include the following: status
of these plans at the end of each period presented, including the number of shares under option, options exercised and
forfeited, the weighted average option prices for these categories, the weighted average fair value of options granted
during the year, and the average remaining contractual life of the options outstanding.
3. Financial statement disclosure of outstanding share warrants that have been issued to purchasers of a company’s bonds
should include the prices at which they can be exercised, the length of time they can be exercised, and the total number
of shares that can be purchased by the bondholders.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Intermediate: IFRS Edition, Solutions Manual 16-49
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
CA 16-4
(a) Generally, the requirements indicate that employee share options be treated like all other types of
compensation and that their value be included in financial statements as part of the costs of employee services. This requires
that all types of share options be recognized as compensation based on the fair value of the options. Fair value for public
companies would be estimated using an option-pricing model. No adjustments after the grant date would be made for changes
in the share price—either up or down.
For both public and nonpublic companies, the value of the award would be charged to expense over the period in which
employees provide the related service, which is generally considered the vesting period.
Expense is recognized over the service period with adjustment (reversal) of expense for options that do not vest, if employees
do not meet the service requirement.
(b) According to Ciesielski’s commentary, the bill in the U.S. Congress would only record expense for the
options granted to the top five executives. They also are recommending that the SEC conduct further study of the issue and
therefore delay the implementation of the new standard. From a comparability standpoint, it is highly unlikely that recording
expense on only some options would result in useful information. It will be difficult to compare compensation costs (and income)
for companies—some that use share options extensively and some that pay their employees with cash.
(c) Here is an excerpt from a presentation given by Dennis Beresford (former FASB chair) on the concept
of neutrality, which says it well.
The FASB often hears that it should take a broader view, that it must consider the economic consequences of a new accounting
standard. The FASB should not act, critics maintain, if a new accounting standard would have undesirable economic
consequences. We have been told that the effects of accounting standards could cause lasting damage to American companies
and their employees. Some have suggested, for example, that recording the liability for retiree health care or the costs for
share-based compensation will place U.S. companies at a competitive disadvantage. These critics suggest that because of
accounting standards, companies may reduce benefits or move operations overseas to areas where workers do not demand the
same benefits. These assertions are usually combined with statements about desirable goals, like providing retiree health care
or creating employee incentives.
There is a common element in those assertions. The goals are desirable but the means require that the Board abandon
neutrality and establish reporting standards that conceal the financial impact of certain transactions from those who use financial
statements. Costs of transactions exist whether or not the FASB mandates their recognition in financial statements. For
example, not requiring the recognition of the cost of share options or ignoring the liabilities for retiree health care benefits does
not alter the economics of the transactions. It only withholds information from investors, creditors, policy makers, and others
who need to make informed decisions and, eventually, impairs the credibility of financial reports.
One need only look to the collapse of the thrift industry to demonstrate the consequences of abandoning neutrality. During the
1970s and 1980s, regulatory accounting principles (RAP) were altered to obscure problems in troubled institutions. Preserving
the industry was considered a greater good.
Many observers believe that the effect was to delay action and hide the true dimensions of the problem. The public interest is
best served by neutral accounting standards that inform policy rather than promote it. Stated simply, truth in accounting is
always good policy.
16-50 Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Intermediate: IFRS Edition, Solutions Manual
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
CA 16-4 (Continued)
Neutrality does not mean that accounting should not influence human behavior. We expect that changes in financial reporting
will have economic consequences, just as economic consequences are inherent in existing financial reporting practices.
Changes in behavior naturally follow from more complete and representationally faithful financial statements. The fundamental
question, however, is whether those who measure and report on economic events should somehow screen the information
before reporting it to achieve some objective. In FASB Concepts Statement No. 2, Qualitative Characteristics of Accounting
Information ( paragraph 102), the Board observed:
Indeed, most people are repelled by the notion that some ―big brother,‖ whether government or private, would
tamper with scales or speedometers surreptitiously to induce people to lose weight or obey speed limits or would
slant the scoring of athletic events or examinations to enhance or decrease someone’s chances of winning or
graduating. There is no more reason to abandon neutrality in accounting measurement.
The Board continues to hold that view. The Board does not set out to achieve particular economic results through accounting
pronouncements. We could not if we tried. Beyond that, it is seldom clear which result we should seek because our constituents
often have opposing viewpoints. Governments, and the policy goals they adopt, frequently change.
CA 16-5
(a) Dividends on outstanding preference shares must be subtracted from net income or added to net loss
for the period before computing EPS on the ordinary shares. This generalization will be modified by the various features and
different requirements preference shares may have with respect to dividends. Thus, if preference shares are cumulative, it is
necessary to subtract their current dividend requirements from net income (or to add them to net loss) regardless of whether or
not the preference dividends were actually declared. Where the preference shares are noncumulative, only preference dividends
actually declared during the current period need be subtracted from net income (or added to net loss) to arrive at the income to be
used in EPS calculations.
In case the preference shares are convertible into ordinary shares when assuming conversion, dividend requirements on the
preference shares are not deducted from net income. This applies when testing for potential dilution to determine whether or not
the diluted EPS figures for the period are lower than earnings per ordinary share figures.
(b) When options and warrants to buy ordinary shares are outstanding and their exercise price (i.e.,
proceeds the corporation would derive from issuance of ordinary shares pursuant to the warrants and options) is less than the
average price at which the company could acquire its outstanding shares as treasury shares the treasury share method is
generally applicable. In these circumstances, existence of the options and warrants would be dilutive. However, if the exercise
price of options and warrants exceeded the average price of the ordinary shares, the cash proceeds from their assumed
exercise would provide for repurchasing more ordinary shares than were issued when the warrants were exercised, thereby
reducing the number of shares outstanding. In these circumstances assumed exercise of the warrants would be antidilutive, so
exercise would not be presumed for purposes of computing diluted EPS.
(c) In arriving at the calculation of diluted EPS where convertible debentures are assumed to be converted, their interest (net of tax)
is added back to net income as the numerator element of the EPS calculation while the weighted-average number of ordinary
shares into which they would be convertible is added to the shares outstanding to arrive at the denominator element of the
calculation.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Intermediate: IFRS Edition, Solutions Manual 16-51
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
CA 16-6
(a) Earnings per share, as it applies to a corporation with a capitalization structure composed of only one
class of ordinary shares is the amount of earnings applicable to each ordinary share outstanding during the period for which the
earnings are reported. The computation of earnings per share should be based on a weighted average of the number of shares
outstanding during the period with retroactive recognition given to share splits or reverse splits and to share dividends. The
computation should be made for income from continuing operations, and net income. Companies that report a discontinued
operation, should present a per share amount for this item either on the face of the income statement or in the notes to the
financial statements.
(b) Treatments to be given to the listed items in computing earnings per share are:
1. Outstanding preference shares with a par value liquidation right issued at a premium, although affecting the
determination of book value per share, will not affect the computation of earnings per ordinary share except with respect
to the dividends as discussed in 4. below.
2. The exercise of an ordinary share option results in an increase in the number of shares outstanding, and the computation
of earnings per share should be based on the weightedaverage number of shares outstanding during the period. The
exercise of a share option by the grantee does not affect earnings, but any compensation to the officers from the granting
of the options would reduce net income and earnings per share.
3. The replacement of a machine immediately prior to the close of the current fiscal year will not affect the computation of
earnings per share for the year in which the machine is replaced. The number of shares remains unchanged and since
the old machine was sold for its book value, earnings are unaffected.
4. Dividends declared on preference shares should be deducted from income from continuing operations and net income
before computing earnings per share applicable to the ordinary shares and other residual securities. If the preference
shares are cumulative, this adjustment is appropriate whether or not the amounts of the dividends are declared or paid.
5. Acquiring treasury shares will reduce the weighted-average number of shares outstanding used in the EPS denominator.
6. When the number of ordinary shares outstanding increases as a result of a 2-for-1 share split during the year, the
computation should be based on twice the number of weighted average shares outstanding prior to the share split.
Retroactive recognition should be given for all prior years presented.
7. The existence of a provision for a contingent liability on a possible lawsuit created out of retained earnings will not affect
the computation of earnings per share since the appropriation of retained earnings does not affect net income or the
number of shares outstanding.
16-52 Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Intermediate: IFRS Edition, Solutions Manual
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
CA 16-7
I hope that the following brief explanation helps you understand why your warrants were not included in Rhode’s earnings per share
calculations.
Earnings per share (EPS) provides income statement users a quick assessment of the earnings that were generated for each ordinary
share outstanding over a given period. When a company issues only ordinary and preference shares, it has a simple capital structure;
consequently, the only ratio needed to calculate EPS is the following:
However, corporations that have outstanding a variety of other securities—convertible bonds, convertible preference shares, share
options, and share warrants—have a complex capital structure. Because these securities could be converted to they have a potentially
―dilutive‖ effect on EPS.
In order not to mislead users of financial information, the accounting profession insists that EPS calculations be conservative. Thus, a
security which might dilute EPS must be figured into EPS calculations as though it had been converted into common stock. Basic EPS
assumes a weighted-average of common stock outstanding while diluted EPS assumes that any potentially dilutive security has been
converted.
Some securities, however, might actually inflate the EPS figure rather than dilute it. These securities are considered antidilutive and are
excluded from the EPS computation. Take, for example, your warrants. The computations below provide a good example of how
options and warrants are treated in diluted EPS. In these computations, we assume that Rhode will purchase treasury shares using the
proceeds from the exercise of your warrants.
If we assume that Rhode exercises 30,000 warrants at $30, the company does not simply add 30,000 shares to ordinary shares
outstanding; rather, for diluted EPS, Rhode is assumed to purchase and retire
36,000 [(30,000 X $30) ÷ $25] treasury shares at $25 with the proceeds. Therefore, if you add the 30,000 exercised warrants to the
ordinary shares outstanding and then subtract the 36,000 shares presumably purchased, the number of shares outstanding would be
reduced to 94,000 (100,000 + 30,000 – 36,000). Because the ratio’s denominator would be reduced by this inclusion, it would cause the
ratio to increase, which defeats the purpose of the assumed exercise. These warrants are considered antidilutive and, therefore, are not
included in EPS calculations.
This explanation should address any concerns you may have had about the use of your warrants in EPS calculations. If you have any
further questions, please call me.
Sincerely,
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Intermediate: IFRS Edition, Solutions Manual 16-53
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
5. The accounts to which the proceeds from these option exercises are credited are Share
Capital and Share Premium.
6. The number of outstanding options at March 29, 2008, is 28,444,760 at an average exercise
price of 403.1p.
(c) M&S also has a performance share plan, deferred share bonus plan,
restricted share plan UK share incentive plan, share matching deal plan, and an M&S
employee benefit trust.
16-54 Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Intermediate: IFRS Edition, Solutions Manual
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Intermediate: IFRS Edition, Solutions Manual 16-55
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
(a) Account
Current Liabilities 554,114
Convertible Debt 648,020
Total Liabilities 1,228,313
Equity 176,413
Net Income 58,333
(b) Sepracor is doing very well. Its ROA and ROE are above the industry
average. However, its debt level is quite high, compared to the industry. This may suggest it
is a riskier investment and may require a higher rate of return than the 5% coupon. Investors
likely were attracted to the convertible bonds due to the possibility that Sepracor’s share
price will increase, and they can cash in on these gains when they convert to ordinary shares.
(c) Under IFRS, the debt and equity components of a convertible bond are
separately recorded as liabilities and equity. Assuming an liability component of $398,020, for
the Sepracor bonds, the following adjusted amounts would be used in the analysis. Since
Bayer, if it had convertible bonds, would allocate the bond amount between debt and equity,
the same should be done for Sepracor to make their ratios comparable.
Reclassified:
Account
Current Liabilities 554,114
Convertible Debt 398,020
Total Liabilities 978,313
Equity 426,413
Net Income 58,333
The adjustment results in Sepracor reporting a higher level of equity and less debt. Although
Sepracor reports the same ROA, but lower ROE, the debt to assets ratio is in line with the
industry level, suggesting Sepracor may not be as risky as the earlier analysis suggests. The
5% rate may be about right.
16-56 Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Intermediate: IFRS Edition, Solutions Manual
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
ACCOUNTING
A mortization S chedule
Interest
Expense Discount Carrying Value
Date Cash Paid (9%) Amortized of Bonds
1/1/11 $161,494
12/31/11 $12,000 $14,534 $2,534 164,028
12/31/12 12,000 14,763 2,763 166,791
12/31/13 12,000 15,011 3,011 169,802
Diluted EPS
Net income $30,000 $27,000
Add: Interest savings (see schedule above) 14,763 14,534
Adjusted net income (1) $44,763 $41,534
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Intermediate: IFRS Edition, Solutions Manual 16-57
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
ANALYSIS
EPS Presentation
2012 2011
Net income $30,000 $27,000
Basic EPS $ 3.00 $ 2.70
Diluted EPS $ 2.80 $ 2.60
EPS standards are important to analysts who rely on reported earnings per share numbers in their
analyses. A price-earnings (P-E) ratio is the price per share divided by earnings per share. Analysts
use P-E ratios in a variety of analyses, including the evaluation of earnings quality and the
assessment of a company’s growth prospects. The more variation in how companies compute
EPS, the less comparable are EPS numbers across companies and across time for the same
company.
PRINCIPLES
IFRS for convertible debt primarily differs from U.S. GAAP on convertible debt in that IFRS requires
that companies split the proceeds from issuance into a liability component and an equity
component. For example, in part (a) Garner estimated the portion of the proceeds attributable to
the liability component of the bonds. Under U.S. GAAP the proceeds from Garner’s bond issue
would be recorded entirely as bonds payable:
16-58 Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Intermediate: IFRS Edition, Solutions Manual
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
Supporters of the IFRS treatment would argue that separating the bond issue into liability and
equity components provides more representational faithful information into the financial
statements. That is, the resulting financial statements do a better job of representing the
underlying economics of the transaction. When bond investors buy bonds with a conversion
feature, they are very likely paying something for the option to convert (i.e. investors value the
option to become equity holders). Supporters of the U.S. treatment would argue that estimating the
value of the conversion option is difficult and that the resulting number is not very reliable. Thus,
IFRS potentially sacrifices reliability in favor of representational faithfulness while U.S. GAAP does
the reverse.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Intermediate: IFRS Edition, Solutions Manual 16-59
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
PROFESSIONAL RESEARCH
(b) The objectives for accounting for stock compensation are (as stated by
IFRS 2, paragraph 1): The objective of this IFRS is to specify the financial reporting by an
entity when it undertakes a share-based payment transaction. In particular, it requires an
entity to reflect in its profit or loss and financial position the effects of share-based payment
transactions, including expenses associated with transactions in which share options are
granted to employees. IFRS 2, IN5 states the role of fair value measurement: For equity-settled
share-based payment transactions, the IFRS requires an entity to measure the goods or
services received, unless that fair value cannot be estimated reliably. If the entity cannot
estimate reliably the fair value of the goods or services received, the entity is required to
measure their value, and the corresponding increase in equity, indirectly, by reference to the
fair value of the equity instruments granted.
For equity-settled share-based payment transactions, the entity shall measure the goods or
services received, and the corresponding increase in equity, directly, at the fair value of the
goods or services received, unless that fair value cannot be estimated reliably. If the entity
cannot estimate reliably the fair value of the goods or services received, the entity shall
measure their value, and the corresponding increase in equity, indirectly, by reference to the
fair value of the equity instruments granted (par. 10).
12. The fair value of those equity instruments shall be measured at grant date ( par. 11).
16-60 Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Intermediate: IFRS Edition, Solutions Manual
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
Typically, shares, share options or other equity instruments are granted to employees as part
of their remuneration package, in addition to a cash salary and other employment benefits.
Usually, it is not possible to measure directly the services received for particular components
of the employee’s remuneration package. It might also not be possible to measure the fair
value of the total remuneration package independently, without measuring directly the fair
value of the equity instruments granted. Furthermore, shares or share options are sometimes
granted as part of a bonus arrangement, rather than as a part of basic remuneration, eg as an
incentive to the employees to remain in the entity’s employ or to reward them for their efforts
in improving the entity’s performance. By granting shares or share options, in addition to
other remuneration, the entity is paying additional remuneration to obtain additional benefits.
Estimating the fair value of those additional benefits is likely to be difficult. Because of the
difficulty of measuring directly the fair value of the services received, the entity shall measure
the fair value of the employee services received by reference to the fair value of the equity
instruments granted (par. 12).
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Intermediate: IFRS Edition, Solutions Manual 16-61
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
PROFESSIONAL SIMULATION
Explanation
(a) The controller’s computations were not correct in that the straight arithmetic
average of the ordinary shares outstanding at the beginning and end of the year was used.
Financial Statements
(b)
16-62 Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Intermediate: IFRS Edition, Solutions Manual
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit http://downloadslide.blogspot.com
Schedule A
* Computation of weighted-average number of shares adjusted for dilutive securities
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kieso Intermediate: IFRS Edition, Solutions Manual 16-63