Time COMMENTS

Affirmative Negative 1A 1N 2A 2N
1AC 1NC 2AC 2NC/1NR 1AR 2NR
OV
OV
OV
OV
OV
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
2AR
1AC 1NC 2AC 2NC/1NR 1AR 2NR
OV
OV
OV
OV
OV
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
2AR
1AC 1NC 2AC 2NC/1NR 1AR 2NR
china diplo says yes OV
engagment now thumps OV
disads
OV
OV
OV
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
2AR
1AC 1NC 2AC 2NC/1NR 1AR 2NR
us law prevents coop over OV space conolizatoin causes no conlization don’t get we have only been in orbit we concede no
space with China sopead of dieases bacteria area and the moon conlonization
Colonizing mars is key to OV will be reliant on earth space coops sovlves aff calls for mars don’t get the turn
solving extinction
bilat coop solves OV any risk of extinctoin deters
conolization
space colonizatino solves OV no mars conolization
civilization brink
tech critique fails OV
1 growth is will cause war
2 growth non sustainable
3 decline will not cause war
4 growth cuase warming
5 collapse creates changes
and solves warming
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
2AR
1AC 1NC 2AC 2NC/1NR 1AR 2NR
exisiting regime leads to OV weaponizing space is key yes space war now will cuz weaponization is critical yes miscalc no risk of miscalc
space conflicts now ext now'

increase space tension OV weaponization will fail crebile says that we need don’t read a card on it resaurrnce prevents the multiple checks
causes nuke war deterrence need arms race return
ressaurace
space deterrence with OV risk of attacks are low weaponiation will spillover no reason why it will spill space weaponization asias pivot is a check
reassurance stops wars over to earth
space debry makes OV best data concludes no no answer to asteroids asteroids cards are from not going for the asteroids
monitoring impossible- impact to heg 26 years aggo internal links
asteroids aliens
extinction OV we have to deflect the esclations coming if space wars collapses heg
asteroids asteroids coming would cuz sattilies
trigger
space war destorys world 1 econ decline is bad collapse coming now heg solves great power
econmy conflicts
econ leads to extinction 2 leads to war growth is unstatnible- space conlization
specificly its becoming less collapses the ecoonomy
hospitable to human life
pablo9- space war destroys 3 lean towards towards resource restainted leads to extinctionk
heg empirics on collapse constrains growth
heg solves great power war 4 degrotwth makes warming its gonnat ake more than growth is sustatinble
worse one earth
space wars destroyo eath 5 concded that aff is biggest growth collapses the conceded technology
monitoring interanl link to solve enviorment
warming
k2 warming 6 we need four more dedev is true will take
extinction 7 planetsf
worse than past 65 ages
no impact
millions years cuz of
8 growth
econ growth cuases loss
of biod
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
2AR
there is not a growth
sustaibble claim coming
from the 2nr
no reason why growth
doesn’t solve

loss of biod is not an impact

no alternative to growth

econ decline leads to war

1AC 1NC 2AC 2NC 1AR 2NR
bilat coop solves relations OV NO us russia war best yes china russia war no analysis pivot is not responsive
prevents crisis empiraics
reverse cuasual relations OV no miscalc yes miscalc china wouldn’t attack coop solves scs war cuz
stop conflict without a earth based solves tensions
trigger
scs wars and cyber conflict OV asia pivot would keep they conceded that obama
backlash from happening will be pished which will
increase tensions
scs war ineev without coop OV as long as we access an have a lot of nukes
internal link we will solve
esclation coming-XI OV vote neg
china escclates 1
Extinciton-Whitner 11 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
2AR
1NC 2AC 2NC/1NR 1AR 2NR 2AR
Us should build OV perm do both no perm do both doesn’t the perm does both of all
offshore wind farms reason why you cant work
do both
Solves warming OV need sattiltes to solves intrisitic perms are bad no mutual exculsivity

OV offshore is bad solves warming backup powers mean

never can soslve
OV solves warming better tech can solve warming
than the aff can
OV solving in the status quo links to elections
already
1 solves multiple warming
causes
2 CP solves beter
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
1NC 2AC 2NC/1NR 1AR 2NR 2AR
Clitions wins in 2016 OV case OW and turns trump card case O/W turns disasd
Louis 16 disasd
China tech trade links OV hegs solves disad heg solves the da coop solves the disad
turn
Turns case trumps kills OV uq overwhelms the nuclear terror would no link extension
nasa clintion does not link kills any terror
Trumps caues terrorism OV something thumps We have to acess the list of more important
the disad bigger internatl link issues
terrorism leads to OV there is no link to uq link was before trump has no space
extinction diasd we ware not orlando thumper plcies
military ev
1 no nuke terror too shift the posture they have conceded no
many obstacles spin link
2 the engagement would there are too many
mean trump isolation barriers to nuke terror
wouldn’t matter asia war
pivot
3 no thumper means uq case solves the impacts
4 doesn’t take into case heg solves
the econ power of isis
other terror groups
5 trump would be us chiang coops solvevs
precieved as a weak instability
president
6 bad rhetoric
7 the race is close
8 there is a marginal risk
of the link
9 space miliratization
would be big and in the
public speher
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
1NC 2AC 2NC/1NR 1AR 2NR 2AR
us moving towards OV case solves disad japan would backlash to appeasment key to the containement dias
containment any form of appeasment allinaces turns the aff -coops isnt
biggest internal links
plan is a form of OV contaitnment makes contatinemnt creatse they are being pressuerd containment is bigger
appeasment the impacts inev more military now link because of japan
cooperations
china freak out build OV past engagmenet nushan says t hat are japan will never go there is no risk of the aff
nukes should trigger preeicing china as a nuclear happening
power is a bad thing
prolif across china and OV aff is key to no detternce only in like the us backlash is going to
asia disescation space and the plan happen
doesn’t assure anyting
about backlash
OV we need a comb of disads O/w turns the disad only allowes for japan would freak out if
appes and case deterence of hundreds of we appease china
detterncene deteernces
1 space coops is key ja[an would get nukes japan and china are big
from prolif after the aff compiterot
2 relations adv is a better internal link to they hate the usage of
aturn relations nukes
3 empirics prove that no reason why they
relations solve would retaliate
4 no intnentions of no reverse cuasualtiy on
going nuclear heg
5 timeframe dis[rpvpefs
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
1NC 2AC 2NC/1NR 1AR 2NR 2AR
make a blockade in the OV extend the perm
ocean with the navy
naval blockade creaes OV perm do the cp theory crap
necessary china changes
OV resolvse not certain
OV should not
immediatey
OV us still has tech lead
1 us wouldn’t win the
war
2 case is a disad
3 contatinmenet is bad
4 china would say no
5 whitney 11 china us
would cause exg
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
1NC 2AC 2NC/1NR 1AR 2NR 2AR
OV
OV
OV
OV
OV
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
1NC 2AC 2NC/1NR 1AR 2NR 2AR
OV
OV
OV
OV
OV
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
1AC 1NC 2AC 2NC/1NR 1AR 2NR
OV
OV
OV
OV
OV
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
2AR
1AC 1NC 2AC 2NC/1NR 1AR 2NR
OV
OV
OV
OV
OV
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
2AR
1AC 1NC 2AC 2NC/1NR 1AR 2NR
OV
OV
OV
OV
OV
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
2AR
1NC 2AC 2NC/1NR 1AR 2NR 2AR
OV
OV
OV
OV
OV
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
1NC 2AC 2NC/1NR 1AR 2NR 2AR
OV
OV
OV
OV
OV
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20