Comparison Between Head Types: Hemi, SE, F&D and Flat – Pressure V... https://pveng.com/home/asme-code-design/comparison-between-head-ty...

A cylindrical shell made of 0.500 inch thick Sa-516 70 material (rated to 20,000 psi at 100°F) is rolled to 48”
OD. The inside diameter (ID) ends up at 47”. This cylinder and the seams joining it to any attached heads are
fully radiographed, and there is no corrosion allowance. The ASME VIII-1 calculated design pressure for the
cylinder is 420 psi.

Four commonly used head types on vessels are Hemispherical (Hemi), Semi Elliptical (SE), Flanged and
Dished (F&D) and Flat. For this article, each of the four heads is attached to the cylinder, with diameters
matching on the ID. The wall thickness is varied to meet the 420 psi rating of the cylinder. The full calculation
set is linked below.

The results – thickness, height, volume and weight of one head only, including straight flanges when present:

Head Thickness [in] Outside Height [in] Volume [US gal] Weight [lbs]

Cylinder, 24” long 0.5 24 180.25 506.7

Hemi 0.2474 23.75 117.7 245.5

SE * 0.4947 13.74 70.1 397.3

F&D * 0.8901 10.29 47.7 602.9

Flat 3.9120 3.91 0 1920.8

* Including the 1 ½” straight flange

1 of 8 6/17/2019, 7:27 PM
Comparison Between Head Types: Hemi, SE, F&D and Flat – Pressure V... https://pveng.com/home/asme-code-design/comparison-between-head-ty...

The hemispherical head has a simple radial geometry: the depth of the head is half the diameter. With a 47”
ID, the required wall thickness is 0.2474”, about half the thickness of the shell. Because the head is thinner
than the shell, a standard code 3:1 taper is used on the transition. (The transition is part of the stronger head,
the shell is not tapered down on the straight section because it needs the full thickness.)

Usually a hemi head cannot be formed from a flat sheet, instead it is made from welded pieces, making this,
the thinnest head, sometimes the most expensive. It is commonly used in large diameter or high pressure
applications where material savings are important. Two spherical heads back to back make a storage
sphere, the most efficient shape for pressurized storage.

The Semi Elliptical head has an elliptical form – the most common ratio is 2:1 – or the width of the ellipse is
twice the depth. (the width of the head is 4x the head depth). Other ratios are possible but not commonly
used. In practice the fabricator will often make the SE head from 3 radii that approximate an ellipse – large in
the crown, smallest at the outside diameter, with an intermediate radius in the middle. Code rules dictate
how close the approximation has to be to a true ellipse. Code rules also exist allowing a two radius – crown
and knuckle – which would normally be considered as a F&D head, to be considered a SE head if special
values are used (Ug-32(c): An acceptable approximation of a 2:1 ellipsoidal head is one with a knuckle radius of 0.17D
and a spherical radius of 0.90D.).

This 2:1 SE head is made from half of an ellipse, so the head depth is a quarter the diameter. The depth is
half as much as the hemi head, but more than the F&D and Flat head. SE heads can be made from a flat
plate, resulting in what is often the most economical head for low pressure vessels.

The SE is not as efficient at handling stresses as the hemi, so the design rules require more thickness. The
ASME code design formulas for a 2:1 SE are very close to that of the cylinder – in this case resulting in a
required thickness of 0.4947” for the SE vs 0.500” for the cylinder.

2 of 8 6/17/2019, 7:27 PM
Comparison Between Head Types: Hemi, SE, F&D and Flat – Pressure V... https://pveng.com/home/asme-code-design/comparison-between-head-ty...

Flanged and Dished heads are commonly used where pressure is moderate and the overall height is
important. Here a 48” inside radius (equal to the outside diameter of the cylinder) used for the crown of the
head, along with a tight 2.973” knuckle results in a head that is lower than the semi-elliptical. The tight
knuckle radius results in high forming stresses – in this case post forming heat treatment (stress relief) is
required.

The flanged and dished head requires more thickness than the matching cylinder, here 0.8901”. Again a
code standard 3:1 transition on the straight flange portion of the head (Which only needs to be 0.5000”)
handles the difference in thickness. Unless the height is important, a vessel with a pressure as high as this
48” design would typically use a SE instead.

The hemi head is the most efficient, containing the pressure in pure tension. The other designs substitute
various amounts of bending stresses at lower efficiency to lower the head height and pay for it in increased
weight. This flat head, working purely in bending, pays for it with a massive 3.9120” thickness. Flat heads
are usually reserved for processes that require flat inside surfaces.

Many solutions have been developed to provide flat heads on the inside of the vessels without the huge
weight of steel a flat head requires:

A flat plate with tie rods or rings connected to the SE or F&D head it is mounted in. The head supports the load, and
the plate provides a flat surface for the process.
Pouring a flat concrete floor in SE or F&D heads. The weight is still very high, but much less steel is used.
Thin flat plate supported by exterior beams across the width.
Thin flat plate with stay rods (or tubes) through the length of the vessel to the opposite flat head.
Thin flat plate with diagonal stay rods tied to the shell – often seen in boilers.

The ASME VIII-1 code equations used for Cylinders and Hemi heads are easily derived. The ½” thick
cylinder ends up with a stress equal to the code design stress limit of 20,000 psi. When calculated by FEA
using a Tresca formulation, the stress is 20,484 psi Tresca or Stress Intensity P1-P3. Also the 0.2474” thick
hemispherical head ends up with a stress of 20,364 psi. Both stresses are very close to the target of 20,000
psi.

3 of 8 6/17/2019, 7:27 PM
Comparison Between Head Types: Hemi, SE, F&D and Flat – Pressure V... https://pveng.com/home/asme-code-design/comparison-between-head-ty...

Stress Intensity (P1-P3) in a Cylinder and Hemi Head equaling the code design target stresses. The
discontinuity zone shows the highest stresses (thin shell beside the transition).

The stress is higher in the discontinuity zone of the head to shell junction (23,060 psi). The VIII-2 code rules
allow for these increases over small distances and provides limits. The stress in this case is acceptable. The
VIII-1 rules, beyond the requirement for a 3:1 taper, ignore these stresses which by experience are known to
work.

The Tresca stresses provide a very close match between the VIII-1 code rules and the measured FEA
stresses for the cylinder and the Hemi head by VIII-2 FEA methods. However, VIII-2 changed from using
Tresca (P1-P3 stress) to von Mises formulation.

4 of 8 6/17/2019, 7:27 PM
Comparison Between Head Types: Hemi, SE, F&D and Flat – Pressure V... https://pveng.com/home/asme-code-design/comparison-between-head-ty...

Von Mises stress in the cylinder and hemi head – the cylinder stress is now 12% below the VIII-1 code

Theoretically von Mises stress results range from equivalent to Tresca (P1-P3), to 15% lower. In this
example the reported stress in the cylinder is now 17,740 psi, 12% below the reported Tresca value, but the
reported stress in the hemi head remains at 20,322 psi.

FEA results are required to be done to VIII-2 methods, including the use of von-Mises stress reporting,
however VIII-1 stress equations that are derivable are done to Tresca methods. VIII-2 has rules for the design
of cylinders which match the Tresca stress methods, however, VIII-2 allow the use of Part 5 FEA rules to
replace Part 4 design rules.

The designer will get a thinner cylindrical shell when designing to VIII-2 part 5 than VIII-2 part 4. As FEA
methods from VIII-2 part 5 gradually replace code rules as found in VIII-1 and VIII-2 part 4, reduced
cylindrical thicknesses will be seen. The hemi heads will not change.

The remainder of this article uses von Mises reported stress.

The VIII-1 formulation for 2:1 SE heads results in required thicknesses equal to that of the shell. However,
the code equation is not a predictor of actual stress. It is a design rule that produces results that are known
to work based on a combination of what can be easily calculated, and appropriate factors of safety to keep
the design safe. The actual stress in the SE head is higher in the knuckle region and equal to the design
stress in the crown. VIII-1 nozzle reinforcement rules account for this requiring more reinforcement in the
knuckle region.

The F&D head, even with its thicker construction, has much higher stress in the knuckle region. It is common
in thinner F&D heads to exceed the VIII-2 allowable stresses in the knuckle. Programs like Nozzle Pro often
cannot calculate nozzles in F&D heads, because the heads fail VIII-2 rules, even without the added stress of
an included nozzle. F&D heads are known to be safe, but if the heads were invented today, the required
thickness for some would be higher. Designers are particularly cautioned about putting large nozzles in the
knuckle region

5 of 8 6/17/2019, 7:27 PM
Comparison Between Head Types: Hemi, SE, F&D and Flat – Pressure V... https://pveng.com/home/asme-code-design/comparison-between-head-ty...

SE (left) and F&D head – the knuckle stresses are higher, especially in the F&D head

Be cautious using FEA for the design of these two head types because the knuckle stresses are in tension in
the longitudinal direction (along the length of the shell) but can be compressive in the radial direction. The
knuckle of these heads can buckle if made too thin.

As FEA methods are more commonly used, we expect that F&D head thicknesses (for large diameter thinner
heads) will be higher. We do not expect SE head designs to change much.

VIII-1 formulas for flat heads result in heads that have center section stresses as calculated by FEA much
lower than code rules allow. The flat head is in bending, which has allowable stresses of 1.5x membrane, or
30,000 psi in this case. The actual center stress is half of this. The code rules are more focused on the head
to shell transition where an overbuilt head keeps the transition safe.

6 of 8 6/17/2019, 7:27 PM
Comparison Between Head Types: Hemi, SE, F&D and Flat – Pressure V... https://pveng.com/home/asme-code-design/comparison-between-head-ty...

Very low code allowable stresses in the flat head, higher in the shell junction.

As designers get more freedom to use VIII-2 FEA methods in flat head design, where possible the heads will
be made thinner all round, with more thickness in the center than the edges. These thinner heads will have
more rotation at the head to shell junction requiring the designer to give this area much deserved attention.
As FEA use becomes more common, we expect flat head thicknesses to reduce.

Download the Compress ASME calculation set for the four heads and cylindrical shell. [PVE-3101, Cameron
Moore, Michael Tomlinson, Laurence Brundrett]

We work to many ASME standards to design and validate pressure vessels, boiler, fittings
and piping systems. We have experience designing thousands of vessels and fittings to
multiple codes.

Pressure vessel design to ASME VIII-1 and VIII-2

Hot water heaters and boilers to ASME I and IV
Piping to B31.1, B31.3, B31.5 and others
Burst testing to multiple codes

We use Compress, PV Elite, Design Calcs, Nozzle Pro and our own in-house software.

Finite Element Analysis (FEA) – We use FEA to design and validate fittings and vessels that
cannot be designed by rule-based codes like VIII-1 or B31.3.

Pipe Stress Analysis – Pipe stress analysis is mandatory for British Columbia registration
and it is recommended practice for many other systems.

Canadian Registration Number (CRN) – We are Canada’s largest independent registrar of

7 of 8 6/17/2019, 7:27 PM
Comparison Between Head Types: Hemi, SE, F&D and Flat – Pressure V... https://pveng.com/home/asme-code-design/comparison-between-head-ty...

fittings, vessels and piping under the CRN program registering for more than a thousand
customers.

Pressure Vessel Engineering has twenty years of successful experience in the pressure
vessel field working for more than a thousand customers.

Six Professional Engineers on staff licensed to stamp and sign off on designs for use in all
Canadian jurisdictions.
Fast and professional assistance from our team.

Need help? Our contact information is to the right.

Pressure Vessel Engineering Ltd.

120 Randall Drive, Suite B
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
N2V 1C6

519-880-9808

8 of 8 6/17/2019, 7:27 PM