Anda di halaman 1dari 3

Search our site

33. What was the Indus administrative
machinery like?
about us
© 1995-2019 24!

Seated male figure with head missing. The hair style can be partially
reconstructed by a wide swath of hair and a braided lock of hair or ribbon
hanging along the right side of the back. Discovered in Mohenjo-daro in the

I would like to know something about the nature of the administrative

machinery, their irrigation patterns and nature of society...though i am fully
aware that the type of sources we have to analyse these things are minimal.

Rita Wright
You ask a difficult question to answer without texts, though they often don’t
tell the true story. When I think of living in an Indus city, using the available
data, some ethnographic analogy and a bit of imagination, I think of people
living in neighborhoods (we have that evidence at Harappa, and see my book
on this, chapter 5) and a kind of self-organizing group of people maintaining
some aspects of their streets, etc. I can think of other group enterprises too
(again take a look at my book or I can answer more questions if you like). But
then when I look at trade, it does seem that an organizing body of some sort
went beyond the neighbourhood organization. Unlike our early thoughts about
places like Mesopotamia, where the texts had led us to believe that the State
did EVERYTHING, we know now that was not the case. There were
independent craftsmen, for example, and even traders. So when I think of the
Indus, now, I regard that as a distinct possibility. Well, then who was
responsible for these coordinated city plans. There, I think we have to concede
that a strong leadership (single person, body of people, strong kinship groups,
?) shared concepts about how cities should be built across a wide region, and
then built there cities according to a local plan.


Log in or register to post comments