GROUP NAME _______Kushina Food Corporation_____________

NAME OF STUDENT ________Jayco S. Avila_______

RUBRICS FOR SELF EVALUATION (30 POINTS)

Excellent Satisfactory Meets Needs Unsatisfactory TOTAL

Expectations Improvement
(10 – 9 pts) (8 – 7 pts) (2 – 1 point/s)
(6 – 5 pts) (4 – 3 pts)

Attendance He/She attended He/She attended He/She attended He/She attended He/She attended 9
100-91% of 90-81% of 80-71% of 70-61% of 60-51% of
This evaluates the
attendance of the group scheduled scheduled scheduled scheduled scheduled
member in meetings. meetings. meetings. meetings. meetings. meetings.

Task Fulfillment His/her output was His/her output was His/her output was His/her output was He/she did not 8
submitted submitted submitted submitted fulfill any tasks
This evaluates the
effectiveness of the group punctually, completely and completely, but incompletely, assigned to
member in accomplishing completely, and excellently, but not not excellently and poorly, and late. him/her.
the task assigned to
him/her.
excellently. punctually. punctually.

Cooperation ALWAYS Participates in SELDOM RARELY NEVER participates 9

participates in group discussions participates in participates in in group
This evaluates the ability of
the group member to group discussions. MOST OF THE TIME. group discussions. group discussions. discussions.
coordinate while
maintaining
professionalism.

GRAND TOTAL 26

REMARKS/COMMENTS OF RATING:

Attendance: ___I almost perfect the attendance when we the group have meetings___

Task Fulfillment: __I always do every task assigned to me by the leader, but sometimes I submit it late,__

Cooperation: ___Most of the time I’m involve with the group discussion___

________Jayco S. Avila__________
SIGNATURE OVER PRINTED NAME OF EVALUATOR

GROUP NAME ____Kushina Food Corporation____

GROUP MEMBER TO BE RATED ____Aira Morata____

RUBRICS FOR PEER EVALUATION (30 POINTS)

Excellent Satisfactory Meets Needs Unsatisfactory TOTAL

Expectations Improvement
(10 – 9 pts) (8 – 7 pts) (2 – 1 point/s)
(6 – 5 pts) (4 – 3 pts)

Attendance He/She attended He/She attended He/She attended He/She attended He/She attended 10
100-91% of 90-81% of 80-71% of 70-61% of 60-51% of
This evaluates the
attendance of the group scheduled scheduled scheduled scheduled scheduled
member in meetings. meetings. meetings. meetings. meetings. meetings.

Task Fulfillment His/her output was His/her output was His/her output was His/her output was He/she did not 9
submitted submitted submitted submitted fulfill any tasks
This evaluates the
effectiveness of the group punctually, completely and completely, but incompletely, assigned to
member in accomplishing completely, and excellently, but not not excellently and poorly, and late. him/her.
the task assigned to
him/her.
excellently. punctually. punctually.

Cooperation ALWAYS Participates in SELDOM RARELY NEVER participates 9

participates in group discussions participates in participates in in group
This evaluates the ability of
the group member to group discussions. MOST OF THE TIME. group discussions. group discussions. discussions.
coordinate while
maintaining
professionalism.

GRAND TOTAL 28

REMARKS/COMMENTS OF RATING:

Attendance: Always present_____________________________________

Task Fulfillment: _____She give assignment to everyone and the rest is on her________
Cooperation: _____Always active___________

_________Jayco S. Avila____________

SIGNATURE OVER PRINTED NAME OF EVALUATOR

GROUP NAME ____Kushina Food Corporation____

GROUP MEMBER TO BE RATED ____Adriel De Jesus____

RUBRICS FOR PEER EVALUATION (30 POINTS)

Excellent Satisfactory Meets Needs Unsatisfactory TOTAL

Expectations Improvement
(10 – 9 pts) (8 – 7 pts) (2 – 1 point/s)
(6 – 5 pts) (4 – 3 pts)

Attendance He/She attended He/She attended He/She attended He/She attended He/She attended 10
100-91% of 90-81% of 80-71% of 70-61% of 60-51% of
This evaluates the
attendance of the group scheduled scheduled scheduled scheduled scheduled
member in meetings. meetings. meetings. meetings. meetings. meetings.

Task Fulfillment His/her output was His/her output was His/her output was His/her output was He/she did not 9
submitted submitted submitted submitted fulfill any tasks
This evaluates the
effectiveness of the group punctually, completely and completely, but incompletely, assigned to
member in accomplishing completely, and excellently, but not not excellently and poorly, and late. him/her.
the task assigned to
him/her.
excellently. punctually. punctually.

Cooperation ALWAYS Participates in SELDOM RARELY NEVER participates 9

participates in group discussions participates in participates in in group
This evaluates the ability of
the group member to group discussions. MOST OF THE TIME. group discussions. group discussions. discussions.
coordinate while
maintaining
professionalism.

GRAND TOTAL 28

REMARKS/COMMENTS OF RATING:

Attendance: Always present_____________________________________

Task Fulfillment: _____He do what is assigned to him and help others too________

Cooperation: _____Always active___________

_________Jayco S. Avila____________

SIGNATURE OVER PRINTED NAME OF EVALUATOR

GROUP NAME ____Kushina Food Corporation____

GROUP MEMBER TO BE RATED ____Maxine Tuyay____

RUBRICS FOR PEER EVALUATION (30 POINTS)

Excellent Satisfactory Meets Needs Unsatisfactory TOTAL

Expectations Improvement
(10 – 9 pts) (8 – 7 pts) (2 – 1 point/s)
(6 – 5 pts) (4 – 3 pts)

Attendance He/She attended He/She attended He/She attended He/She attended He/She attended 7
100-91% of 90-81% of 80-71% of 70-61% of 60-51% of
This evaluates the
attendance of the group scheduled scheduled scheduled scheduled scheduled
member in meetings. meetings. meetings. meetings. meetings. meetings.

Task Fulfillment His/her output was His/her output was His/her output was His/her output was He/she did not 9
submitted submitted submitted submitted fulfill any tasks
This evaluates the
effectiveness of the group punctually, completely and completely, but incompletely, assigned to
member in accomplishing completely, and excellently, but not not excellently and poorly, and late. him/her.
the task assigned to
him/her.
excellently. punctually. punctually.

Cooperation ALWAYS Participates in SELDOM RARELY NEVER participates 8

participates in group discussions participates in participates in in group
This evaluates the ability of
the group member to group discussions. MOST OF THE TIME. group discussions. group discussions. discussions.
coordinate while
maintaining
professionalism.

GRAND TOTAL 23

REMARKS/COMMENTS OF RATING:
Attendance: ________Sometimes abent________________________

Task Fulfillment: _____She do her part_______

Cooperation: _____Most of the time active in group discussion__________

_________Jayco S. Avila____________

SIGNATURE OVER PRINTED NAME OF EVALUATOR

GROUP NAME ____Kushina Food Corporation____

GROUP MEMBER TO BE RATED ____Dyan Reuyan____

RUBRICS FOR PEER EVALUATION (30 POINTS)

Excellent Satisfactory Meets Needs Unsatisfactory TOTAL

Expectations Improvement
(10 – 9 pts) (8 – 7 pts) (2 – 1 point/s)
(6 – 5 pts) (4 – 3 pts)

Attendance He/She attended He/She attended He/She attended He/She attended He/She attended 7
100-91% of 90-81% of 80-71% of 70-61% of 60-51% of
This evaluates the
attendance of the group scheduled scheduled scheduled scheduled scheduled
member in meetings. meetings. meetings. meetings. meetings. meetings.

Task Fulfillment His/her output was His/her output was His/her output was His/her output was He/she did not 9
submitted submitted submitted submitted fulfill any tasks
This evaluates the
effectiveness of the group punctually, completely and completely, but incompletely, assigned to
member in accomplishing completely, and excellently, but not not excellently and poorly, and late. him/her.
the task assigned to
him/her.
excellently. punctually. punctually.

Cooperation ALWAYS Participates in SELDOM RARELY NEVER participates 8

participates in group discussions participates in participates in in group
This evaluates the ability of
the group member to group discussions. MOST OF THE TIME. group discussions. group discussions. discussions.
coordinate while
maintaining
professionalism.
 GRAND TOTAL 24

REMARKS/COMMENTS OF RATING:

Attendance: ___Sometime absent_________________________________

Task Fulfillment: _____He make up compared to the past activity she do more now________

Cooperation: ____she became more cooperative lately_____

_________Jayco S. Avila____________

SIGNATURE OVER PRINTED NAME OF EVALUATOR

GROUP NAME ____Kushina Food Corporation____

GROUP MEMBER TO BE RATED ____James Waldie____

RUBRICS FOR PEER EVALUATION (30 POINTS)

Excellent Satisfactory Meets Needs Unsatisfactory TOTAL

Expectations Improvement
(10 – 9 pts) (8 – 7 pts) (2 – 1 point/s)
(6 – 5 pts) (4 – 3 pts)

Attendance He/She attended He/She attended He/She attended He/She attended He/She attended 10
100-91% of 90-81% of 80-71% of 70-61% of 60-51% of
This evaluates the
attendance of the group scheduled scheduled scheduled scheduled scheduled
member in meetings. meetings. meetings. meetings. meetings. meetings.

Task Fulfillment His/her output was His/her output was His/her output was His/her output was He/she did not 9
submitted submitted submitted submitted fulfill any tasks
This evaluates the
effectiveness of the group punctually, completely and completely, but incompletely, assigned to
member in accomplishing completely, and excellently, but not not excellently and poorly, and late. him/her.
the task assigned to
him/her.
excellently. punctually. punctually.

Cooperation ALWAYS Participates in SELDOM RARELY NEVER participates 8

participates in group discussions participates in participates in in group
 This evaluates the ability of group discussions. MOST OF THE TIME. group discussions. group discussions. discussions.
the group member to
coordinate while
maintaining
professionalism.

GRAND TOTAL 27

REMARKS/COMMENTS OF RATING:

Attendance: Always present_____________________________________

Task Fulfillment: _____He do his part in the chapter________

Cooperation: ___sometimes active___________

_________Jayco S. Avila____________

SIGNATURE OVER PRINTED NAME OF EVALUATOR

GROUP NAME ____Kushina Food Corporation____

GROUP MEMBER TO BE RATED ____Xavier Plantado____

RUBRICS FOR PEER EVALUATION (30 POINTS)

Excellent Satisfactory Meets Needs Unsatisfactory TOTAL

Expectations Improvement
(10 – 9 pts) (8 – 7 pts) (2 – 1 point/s)
(6 – 5 pts) (4 – 3 pts)

Attendance He/She attended He/She attended He/She attended He/She attended He/She attended 8
100-91% of 90-81% of 80-71% of 70-61% of 60-51% of
This evaluates the
attendance of the group scheduled scheduled scheduled scheduled scheduled
member in meetings. meetings. meetings. meetings. meetings. meetings.

Task Fulfillment His/her output was His/her output was His/her output was His/her output was He/she did not 7
submitted submitted submitted submitted fulfill any tasks
This evaluates the
effectiveness of the group punctually, completely and completely, but incompletely, assigned to
member in accomplishing
 the task assigned to completely, and excellently, but not not excellently and poorly, and late. him/her.
him/her.
excellently. punctually. punctually.

Cooperation ALWAYS Participates in SELDOM RARELY NEVER participates 8

participates in group discussions participates in participates in in group
This evaluates the ability of
the group member to group discussions. MOST OF THE TIME. group discussions. group discussions. discussions.
coordinate while
maintaining
professionalism.

GRAND TOTAL 23

REMARKS/COMMENTS OF RATING:

Attendance: ___missing in action sometimes__________

Task Fulfillment: _____Sometimes other member do his part______

Cooperation: _____Most of thr time active__________

_________Jayco S. Avila____________

SIGNATURE OVER PRINTED NAME OF EVALUATOR