CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
compressive strength of fly ash increase with increase in fineness of the fly
ash. The author suggested that the optimum percentage of fly ash replacement
in cement was 15% and there was a progressive fall in strength with further
addition of fly ash.
The finer the fly ash, the greater will be the water reducing effect.
Since increase in quantity of fly ash in the cement reduces the water demand
still further, a significant densifying effect results. The ability of any fly ash is
to change the properties of fresh concrete by reducing the water demand. It is
a function, not only of the particulate materials but also of mixing. Concrete
containing fly ash deceptive in that it appears less workable than its Portland
cement counterpart does. Because of the greater fines volume and the smaller
water volume, this has an increased effect on mobility when compaction
energy applied. The author concluded that fly ash has slower pozzolanic
reaction and does not contribute significantly to strength much before 10 to14
days. Fly ash used as pozzolana gives greater durability, lower permeability,
greater sulphate and acid resistance and reduced alkali aggregate reaction.
Swamy (1985) briefly reported that the fly ash can used as a partial
replacement of cement or both for nearly half a century, through still on a
very limited scale. This was rather regrettable considering the large quantity
of fly ash currently produced as an industrial by-product all over the world.
The vast potential it possesses in terms of economy in the consummation of
cement, energy saving and environment benefits. The paper, presented in two
parts, advocates three major areas of fly ash utilization in concrete
construction. The first part of the paper deals with the utilization of fly ash as
partial cement replacement, whilst the second part of the paper deals with the
utilization of the fly ash as lightweight aggregate in concrete and as filler for
special concrete. In the first part, the paper advocates a simple and direct
replacement of cement by fly ash in concrete. The author recommended that
30% replacement of fly ash by weight give all the desirable material
properties of concrete. The structural behaviour of the concrete containing fly
ash is almost identical to that of similar strength concrete. In the form of thin
sections, such as permanent formwork, thin sheet asbestos replacement, Ferro
cement boat construction and sprayed concrete, 50% to 70% replacement of
cement has achieved with sound technical advantages.
28 to 91 days for the mixes containing high volumes of fly ash. At 91 days,
the strength of fly ash concrete shown consistently to exceed that of the
control concretes. The additional strength of about 20 to 30% obtained
between 91 and 365 days.
beyond 28 days. The strength of concrete with 40%, 45% and 50% fly ash
content, even at 28 days was enough for use in reinforced cement concrete
construction. The author found that the abrasion resistance of concrete was
strongly influenced by its compressive strength, irrespective of fly ash
content. Abrasion resistance was found to increase with the increase in age for
all concrete mixtures.
The products built included an alley panel, curb, and gutter sections
in the City and county of Denver, a precast manhole and lid, and a twin tee
pre-stressed girder. Although cement products are just one of many materials
used in the construction of the built environment, its production has a large
25
Mark Reiner &Kevin Rens (2006) observed that fly ash as a partial
replacement for cement has been utilized for many years. It has almost
exclusively used in low volume percentages, such as 10% or 20% cement
replacement. This paper looks at high volume percentage replacements from
40% to 70%. These environmental benefits included 25% reduction in smog,
human health effects and fossil fuel use compared to the same element built
with a 100% Portland cement mix. The author found that economic benefits
included 15% capital cost reduction and 20% life cycle cost reduction, when
compared with a 100% Portland cement mix. Full scale testing includes a
complete mix design in addition to the construction of four concrete
infrastructures products. In addition, he suggested that symbiotic recycling of
waste material, such as fly ash in concrete, back into the built environment
can help reduce materials on the input side and pollution on the output side of
the bulk material flow of an urban city.
Kyle Marie & Marlay (2011) evaluated the hardened concrete and
durability performance of several HVFA concrete mixes. The various HVFA
concrete mixes evaluated within this study consisted of 70 percent
replacement of Portland cement by weight of cementitious material and
water-to-cementitious ratios (w/cm) ranging from 0.30 to 0.45. Studies were
conducted on hardened properties including: compressive strength, flexural
strength, splitting tensile strength, and modulus of rupture. A shrinkage
analysis was also performed to evaluate drying and free shrinkage. The
durability performance of the HVFA concrete was also evaluated. Results
obtained from the tests revealed that compressive strengths of HVFA concrete
are comparable to Portland cement concrete with a reduced w/cm. Also, a
reduction in concrete shrinkage was observed for HVFA concrete. The
durability testing showed HVFA concrete increased the corrosion resistance
and decreased the chloride penetration. Finally, the authors suggested that the
existing relationships for hardened material properties and durability of
conventional concretes are applicable to HVFA concretes.
strength for all grades of HVFA concrete. These results confirm the feasibility
that up to 80% of Class F fly ash can be suitably used as cement replacement
in concrete by using a rational mixture proportions. Rational mix design
method was proposed for the very HVFA concrete. 80% fly ash concrete may
be obtained using 136 kg Portland cement. The HVFA concrete was found to
be an adequate material for both structural and pavement application. The
authors concluded, the concrete containing fly ash of up to 80% of
cementitious material content can be proportioned to have adequate
workability when a more suitable Sp was used (Menta 2003).
results obtained from the proposed method used to evaluate flexural capacity
of beams with confinement.
result showed that mortar and concrete made with Portland cement-free
activated fly ash develop a high mechanical strength in short period of time,
have a moderate modulus of elasticity and better binding strength.
Jo Jacob Raju & Jino John (2014), High volume fly ash concrete is
recommended over the ordinary concrete as it considerably saves cement and
also prevents environmental pollution. The use of fibres improves specific
material properties of the concrete, impact resistance, flexural strength,
toughness, fatigue resistance, and ductility. The author made an attempt to
study the mechanical properties of HVFA concrete with addition of fibres at
0.1, 0.2, and 0.3% of cement and with 60% fly ash replacement with cement.
It was found that fibre additions have increased its strength characteristics
considerably over the ordinary cement concrete. A mathematical model was
developed using SPSS 20 for the strength parameters of HVFA concrete with
fibres. The major parameter that affected strength was total binders and water-
binder ratio.
36
compression zone. In this aspect, HVFA concrete beam has designed with
confinement in compression zone.
From the literature review, it was found that the HVFA concrete
exhibits reduced compressive strength, flexural strength and split tensile
strength properties during the earlier stages of curing (28 days). But the fly
ash reacts with CSH gel at later stages and increases the strength properties at
90 days of curing due to pozzolanic properties. When concrete is confined
with steel, the behaviour of the concrete is completely changed and exhibits
more load carrying capacity and ductility. The presence of fly ash in high
volumes also exhibits the similar behaviour under confinements.