Schering 1

Bibliography

Baker-Eveleth, L., & Stone, R. W. (2015). Usability, expectation, confirmation, and

continuance intentions to use electronic textbooks. Behaviour & Information

Technology, 34(10), 992–1004.

https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2015.1039061

Brooke, C. G. (2009). Lingua Fracta. New Jersey: Hampton Press.

Chi, Y. (2014). The E-volution of Publishing: Challenges and Opportunities in the

Digital Age. Publishing Research Quarterly, 30(4), 344–351. https://doi-

org.libproxy.lib.ilstu.edu/10.1007/s12109-014-9384-1

Clary-Lemon, J. (2015). Museums as material: Experiential landscapes and the

Canadian museum for human rights.” Retrieved from

http://enculturation.net/museums-as-material.

Cisneros, J. D. (2006). (Re)Making the immigrant body: Rhetoric, materiality, and

social protest in “La Gran Marcha.” National Communication Association

Conference, 2008, San Diego, Ca.

Cope, B., & Phillips, A. (Eds). (2006). Future of the book in the digital age. Great

Britain: Oxford.

deNoyelles, A., & Raible, J. (2017). Exploring the use of e-textbooks in higher

education: A multiyear study. Retrieved from:

https://er.educause.edu/articles/2017/10/exploring-the-use-of-e-

textbooks-in-higher-education-a-multiyear-study

Dilger, B. (2006). Extreme usability and technical communication. In Scott, J. B.,

Longo, B., & Wills, K. V. (Eds) Critical power tools: Technical

 Schering 2

communication and cultural studies, (pp. 47-69). Albany: State University of

New York Press.

Eyman, D. (2015). Digital Rhetoric: Theory, Method, Practice. Michigan: U of Michigan

Press.

Farkas D. K., & Farkas J. B. (2002). Principals of web design. London: Longman.

Fesel, S. S., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2018). Individual variation in children’s

reading comprehension across digital text types. Journal of Research in

Reading, 41(1), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12098

Frost, E. (2018). Apparent feminism and risk communication: Hazard, outrage,

environment, and embodiment. In Haas, A., and Eble, M. (EDs) Key theoretical

frameworks: Teaching technical communications in the twenty-first century, pp.

23-45. Louisville, CO: University Press of Colorado.

Gaskell, P. (1995). A new introduction to bibliography: The classical manual of

bibliography. Delaware: Oak Knoll Press

Glenn, C. (1995). Remaping rhetorical territory. Rhetoric Review, 13(2), 287-303.

Gregory, C. L. (2008). “But I want to read a book ”An investigation of

undergraduates’ usage and attitudes towards electronic books. Reference &

user services quarterly, 47(3), 266-273.

Gurak, L. J. & Smiljana Antonijevic. (2008). Digital rhetoric and public discourse,

In Lunsford, A., Eberly, R. A., & Wilson, K. H. (Eds.) The Sage Handbook of

Rhetorical Studies pp. 520-531, California: SAGE Publications.

Hay, L. (1987). Genetic editing, past and future: A few reflections by a user.

Transactions of the Society for Textual Scholarship, 117-133.

 Schering 3

Howard, N. (2009). The book: The life story of a technology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins

UP.

Houghton Mifflin Harcort. (2019). Houghton Mifflin Harcourt appoints Mike Evans

as chief revenue officer, new leadership role enables deeper focus on

customer. Retrieved from https://www.prnewswire.com/news-

releases/houghton-mifflin-harcourt-appoints-mike-evans-as-chief-revenue-

officer-new-leadership-role-enables-deeper-focus-on-customer-

300899947.html

Howell, V. (2014). E-books and reading experiences. The Journal of Publishing

Culture. 2. N.p.

Joseph, R. (2015). Higher Education Book Publishing-from Print to Digital: A Review

of the Literature. Publishing Research Quarterly, 31(4), 264–274. https://doi-

org.libproxy.lib.ilstu.edu/10.1007/s12109-015-9429-0

Kahler, J. E. (2017). Accessibility, textbooks, and Access Services. Journal of Access

Services, 14(3), 138–145.

https://doiorg.libproxy.lib.ilstu.edu/10.1080/15367967.2017.1348901

Landow, G. P. (Ed.) (1994). Hyper/Text/Theory. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP.

Jones, N. & Walton, R. Using narratives to foster critical thinking about diversity and

social justice. In Haas, A, and M. Eble (Eds.) Key theoretical frameworks:

Teaching technical communications in the twenty-first century, pp. 241-267.

Louisville, CO: University Press of Colorado.

Lutkewitte, C. (Ed.) (2014). Multimodal Composition: A Critical Sourcebook. Boston:

 Schering 4

Bedford St. Martins

Mangen, A., Walgermo, B., & Brønnick, K. (2013). Reading linier texts on paper

versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International

Journal of Educational Research, 58, 61-68.

McGann, J. (2004). A note on the current state of humanities scholarship. Critical

Inquiry, 30, 409-413.

-- (1991). The textual condition. New Jersey: Princeton UP.

Medina, C., & Walker, K. (2018). Validating the consequences of a social justice

pedagogy: Explicit values in course-based grading contracts. In Haas, A, and M.

Eble (Eds.) Key theoretical frameworks: Teaching technical communications in

the twenty-first century, pp. 46-67. Louisville, CO: University Press of Colorado.

Min, S. (2019). Pearson ditches print textbooks for college students in digital-first

strategy. Retrieved from: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/pearson-ends-regular-

revisions-of-print-textbooks-for-college-students-in-digital-push/

Office of the Lieutenant Governor of Illinois. (2013). The Illinois p-20 education

overview and resource guide. Retrieved from

https://www2.illinois.gov/sites/P20/Documents/Full%20P-20/Illinois%20P-

20%20Education%20Resource%20Guide%202013.pdf

Pew Research Center. (2019). Social media facts sheet. Retrieved from

https://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/social-media/

Katz. S. (1992). The ethics of expediency: Classical rhetoric, technology, and the

Holocaust. College English, 54(3), 255-275.

Khadka, S. & Lee, J. C. (Eds.) (2019). Bridging the Multimodal Gap: From Theory to
 Schering 5

Practice. Utah: Logan State UP.

Kinskey, C., King, H., & Lewis Miller, C. (2018). Open educational resources: an

analysis of Minnesota State Colleges and Universities student

preferences. Open Learning, 33(3), 190–202.

Lunsford, A., Ruskiewicz, J. J., & Walters, K. (Eds). (2016). Everything’s an Argument.

(7th ed.). Boston: Bedford St. Martins.

McGraw-Hill, (2019). McGraw-Hill continues to rapidly expand access to affordable

college course materials for millions of students in the 2019-20 school year.

Retrieved from: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/mcgraw-hill-

continues-to-rapidly-expand-access-to-affordable-college-course-materials-

for-millions-of-students-in-the-2019-20-school-year-300900071.html

Moeller, M. & Jung, J. (2014). Sites of normalcy: Understanding online education as

prosthetic technology. Disability Studies Quarterly, 34(4).

Millar, M., & Schrier, T. (2015). Digital or Printed Textbooks: Which do Students

Prefer and Why? Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, (2), 166.

Neumann, M., Finger, G., & Neumann, D. (2017). A Conceptual Framework for

Emergent Digital Literacy. Early Childhood Education Journal, 45(4), 471–

479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-016-0792-z

Rickert, T. (2013). Ambient Rhetoric. Pennsylvania: Pittsburg Press.

Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J., Courduff, J., Carter, K. & Bennett, D. (2013). Electronic

versus traditional textbooks: A comparison study on the influence of

university students’ learning. Computers and Education, 63, 259-266.

Roen, D., Glau, G. R., Maid, B. M. (Eds.) (2016). The McGraw-Hill Guide: Writing for
 Schering 6

College, Writing for Life. (4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Scott, J. B., Longo, B., & Wills, K. V. (2006). Introduction: Why Cultural Studies?

Expanding Technical Communication’s Critical Toolbox. In Scott, J. B., Longo,

B., & Wills, K. V. (Eds.) Critical power tools: Technical

communication and cultural studies. Albany: State University of New York

Press.

Seok, S., & DaCosta, B. (2017). Gender Differences in Teens’ Digital Propensity and

Perceptions and Preferences With Regard to Digital and Printed

Text. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 61(2),

171–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0134-4

Sutherland, K. (Ed). (1997). Electronic text: Investigations in method and theory.

Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Tanselle, G.T. (1995). "The Varieties of Scholarly Editing, In D.C. Greetham (Ed.)

Scholarly Editing: A Guide to Research, (pp. 9-32). New York, Modern Language

Association.

Warninck, B. & Heineman, D. S. (Eds) (2012). Rhetoric online: The politics of new

media. New York: Peter Lang.

Woody, W., Daniel, D., & Baker, C. (2010). E-books or textbooks: Students prefer

textbooks. Computers and Education, 55(3), 1-13.

Weisberg, M. (2011). Student Attitudes and Behaviors Towards Digital

Textbooks. Publishing Research Quarterly, 27(2), 188–196.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-011-9217-4