9
rNTERNATIONAL
10
11
OF THE STATE OF ~.~M.I~11
12
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
13
14
LAURA ANN Case No. 411018
15
Plaintiff, Assigned All
16 Honorable Ronald M.
vs. NOTICE OF
17 IDDGMENT
18 RELIGIOUS Complaint
sued herein SAC
19 as Doe AND DOES
2
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
2 NOTICE THAT on June 9, 2010, _,..., ... _... was entered in the above-
6
Dated: July 10
7
8
BERT
9 HAROLD M. BRODY
G. SAMUEL
10
11 G. '-'<.U" ......."
Attorneys for Defendant
12 CHURCH OF
INTERNATIONAL
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- 1-
NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
8086/21051-006 Currentl19864663v1
"
ORIGIN
PROSKAl'ER ROSE LLP
BERT H. DEIXI.ER. SBN 70614
")
HAROLD M. BRUD'{. SBN 84927
]049 CcnlU[\, Park East. 3'::nd Floor
Los Angch.< C1\ 90067 -3:!06
3 Telephone: 310.557.2900 REC'D FILED
Facsimile: 310.557.219)
4 LOS ANGELES SUPERIO COURT
I
I
I
MOXON & KOBRIN MAY 25 2010
I
!
5 KENDRICK L MOXON, SBN 1.2$t'JG G VVINDOW
3055 Wilshire Boulevard. 'Suite <)"~ .WN
6 Los Angeles. California 900 I0
Telephone: (21 487~4468
7 Facsimile: (213) 487-5385
8 Attornevs for Dclcndant
CIIURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
9
JEfFER. MANGELS. BVTLER & MARMARO LLP
10 MARC MARMARO. SBN
A\'IY LERNER HILL SBN 216:;~8
II 1900 Avcnue of the Starl'. SC\'cmh Floor
Los !\ngde~. Calilomia 90067-4308
12 Telephone: (:; JO~· 203-8080
Fac!{imiie: (310) 203-0567
13
Alwrm:\'s lilr Dclcndan!
14 REI.IGIOrS TECHNOLOG'{ CENTER
15 SlrpEiUOi{ COlfH.T OF THE STATE OF CALIFOI{NIA
16 1-'01{ THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
17
25
16
(-~. I
::: 28 !
I
"-I
I
:------~--------- .
I IPROPOS[DI·JVO(;l\tENT
ThC' J)~mllrrer of DefenJant Chu~ch ofSdenlology International r-CSf"') 10 th~ ,,,,,,,"'H'
Amended Complaint ('"SAC') of Laur'd Ann DeCrescem::o ("'Plainlirf') came on regularly li.lr
Ill'tlring by the Courl on March 18.20 I0, at 8:45 a.m .. Ihe Honorable Ronald 1'.'1.. Sohigian, Judge
4 presiding. Kathryn Darnell, and Kimberly Miller. of I'vtctzger Law Group appeared as
counsel fbr 'Plaintiff, and Harold M. Brody, Esq. Proskaucr Rose LLP and Kendrick L, :Vloxon,
6 Esq. of Moxon & Kobrin appeared as counsel for CSt After considering parties' papers and
7 hearing oral argument. and good cause appearing therefore. the Court sustained Ihe Demurrer in its
R entirety, \·vithoUl to amend. on the ground that the SAC and each cause of action therein. is
<) burred by the applicable statutes of limitations and fails to slate facls sufficient to constitute 1.1
10 cauSe or action. A true and correct copy aftne Iranscript of thc Cou!1' 5 MUTch I&. 20 I 0 hearing
13 Lamc 011 reglilarly for hearing by the Court on April 30. 2010, <118:40 a,m .. the HI..1I1orahie Ronald
14 Moo Sohigian. presiding. Kimberly Miller. appeared as counsel for Plaintiff and Marc
!:; !'vlarmaro. Esq. of .!cner. :Vlangcls. Butler & Marmara LLP appeared as cOllnsd for RIC After
16 considering the parties' rapers ant! hearing oral argument. and !!ood causc appearing therefore. thc'
17 COllrt sustained Ihe Demurrer in its entirety. without leU\'C to amend. and dismissed the action in
IR its entirely, on the ground that the SAC, and each cause of action lherdn, is barred by
19 applicable statutes of limitations and fails to slate surficicnt to constit1.lte a cause of action. 1\
20 true and correct copy of the transcript of the Courfs April 30,20 I0 hearing on RTCs Demurrer is
21 attached hereto as Exhibit B.
ConsiSlent therewith, the Court hereby renders Judgment in this matter as follows:
D IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaimifftake nothing by the SAC, and that
Dclcndan!s recover their CO~1s herein in Ihe amount of:
/Jdit.
$
'27
i
; Dated;
i Judge o( t
781i2105~rdD'4
,. '
:urrent J 19f455711
IPIWPOSWI·1ll0GMF.:NT
~..
1"'
fI;
xhibit A
1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
2 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
'\I
13
14
THURSDAY, MARCH 18, 2010
15
16
17
18
19 FOR THE PLAINTIFFS: KATHRYN DARNELL,
ATTORNEY AT LAW
20
KIMBERLY MILLER
21 ATTORNEY AT LAW
22 fOR THE DEfENDANTS; HAROLD M. BRODY,
ATTORNEY AT LAW
23
KENDRICK L. MOXON,
24 ATTORNEY AT LAW
REPORTED BY:
25
ANGELA ZARATAN PARADELA
26 OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
CSR NO. 9659
27
28
1
9
10 (THE FOLLOWING PROCEEDINGS W~RE HELD IN
11 OPEN COURT:)
12
13 THE COURT: DECRESCENZO AGAINST CHURCH OF
14 SCIENTOLOGY, BC411018.
15 MR. BRODY: GOOD MORNING, YOUR HONOR. HAROLD M.
16 BRODY ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT MOVING PARTY.
n MR. MOXON: GOOD MORNING, YOUR HONOR. KENDRICK
18 MOXON ALSO ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANTS.
19 MS. DARNELL: GOOD MORNING, YOUR HONOR. KATHRYN
20 DARNELL OF METZGER LAW GROUP ON BEHALF OF PLAINTIFFS.
21 MS. MILLER: GOOD MORNING, YOUR HONOR. KIM MILLER
22 ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFFS, METZGER LAW GROUP.
23 THE COURT: ANYTHING FURTHER FROM THE MOVANT?
24 MR. BRODY: YOUR HONOR, OTHER THAN WE ARE PREP~RED
, J
~.
'~"
~
'-',
,_I;
~
11
'7
2 (PROCEEDINGS CONCLUDED.)
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
~ --;
.~
I· ~
, .J
~
.",
t-"
.~
1'-
10
11
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
12 S5
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
13
20
21
24
25
26 _____________ , CSR NO. 9659
27 OFFICIAL REPORTER
28
c),
t .~
•• 1
:siI .'.
"J r ·f
(')
~"',
~,
~
---------
1 ~ I
-- --
...
Exhibit B
n I
1 St'PSRIOR COURT OF THE STATE: OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
"~'.
J" 14
FRIDAY, APRIL 30, 2010
15
16
17
18
19 FOR T~E PLAINTIFFS: KIMBERLY MILLER
ATTORNEY AT LAW
20
Foa THE DEfENDANTS: MARC MARMARO,
21 ATTORNEY AT LAW
22
23
REPORTED BY:
25 ANGELA ZARATAN PARADE LA
OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
26 CSR NO: 9659
,- . '\ 27
28
Ex (3
1
EiI.:
'" ( ~
I",
"'~"
H
3 REASON WHY I ASKED YOU ABOUT IT. IT' S NOT REALLY HARD TO
4 UNDERSTAND WHY, ASSUMING THAT THEY WERE FILED ON THE DATE
6 WORK.
15 MINUTE.
t
..\
1~
5 THE RECORD DOES REFLECT THAT, NOT THE RECORD I HAVE IN HAND,
6 BOT THE COMPUTER-MAINTAINED RECORD DOES REFLECT ON THE 16TH
'
l» .:.:
~ <,
i,
;
H
5 SIGNATURE.
{} DOES THAT SOUND OKAY FROM THE PLAINTIFF'S
7 POINT OF VIEW?
i"-
I"
~
5
7 JURY.
S ON THE 30TH OF MARCH, 2010, AFTER I HAD MADE
r.;"
'.J
a ::;
j
""~
21
8 PERSON ON INQUIRY.
9 THIS IS DISCUSSED IN A NUMBER OF CALIFORNIA
10 CASES. ONE THAT'S CONVENIENT IS THE MTT.T,~ CASE AT 108
11 CALIFORNIA ~J.A 4TH 625. THE LANGUAGE I HAVE
i
"-II I' "
.:~.
""r'~
8
5 PLAINTIFF'S BEHALF.
6 BUT ONCE THE PLAINTIFF BECOMES AWARE OF FACTS
j ·
• J
~
~
-
<: ,
"-
~
2::
1 SUICIDE.
2 PLAINTIFF ALLEGES THAT SHE BELIEVED THAT IF
1 FOR IT ~-
3 ASK THE CLERK AND TOLD THE CLERK THAT I NEEDED TO BE ABLE TO
4 CHECK IN UP --
t .J!•
• .l
11
9 38, 52, 64, 80, 110 -- NOT 110 -- IT'S 101, ACTUALLY, AND
10 115.
12
5 INDEED THERE'S NOTHING SPECIAL ABOUT WHEN SHE DID CONFER WITH
15 INTERNET, WHEN SHE LEFT SHE DID HAVE DUTY TO INVESTIGATE THE
16 VALIDITY OF HER CLAIMS - - CONSULTING AN ATTORNEY - - AND SO
17 FORTH.
13
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
,-"
, "-..
• ,1
(I/J ". ...
r·)
~;. .....
'"
~
•
1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
13 SS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
14
21
22 MAY 4, 2010
23
24
25
26
r··
M !""'"
...,
.....
1"
$
31
3 I declare that: I am employed inlhe county of Los Angeles. California. I am over the age or
eighteen years and not a party to the \....ithin cause: my business address is 2049 Century Park
4 Suite 3200, Los Angeles, California 90067-3206.
5 On May 25. 2010, I served the Inr~pt"n document, described as:
6 (pROPOSEDI ORDER
7 I!l by placing 0 the original a true copy thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes
addressed as follows:
8
SEE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST
9
o (By Fax) By transmitting a true and correct copy thereof via facsimile transmission
10 10
23
24
25
26
27
if?
....
~~
c~
3:
SERV1CE LIST
2 Raphael Metzger. BY FEDERAL EXPRESS
Metzger law Group
3 40 I E. Ocean Blvd .. Suite 800
Long Beach, CA 90802-4966
4
Barry Van Sickle, Esq. BY U.S. MAil
5 1079 Sunrise Avenue. Suite B-315
Roseville. CA 95661
6
Marc Marmaro, Esq. 8Y U.S. MAIL
7 JetTer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro LLP
1900 Avenue of the Stars, Seventh Floor
8 Los Angeles. CA 90067-4308
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
26
27