TARLAC STATE UNIVERSITY

VICE PRESIDENT FOR ACADEMIC AFFAIRS

COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES

DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDIES
Tel. no.: (045) 982-2447 Fax: (045) 982-0110 website: www.tsu.edu.ph

RUBRIC FOR ASSESSMENT

HUM 1 – Art Appreciation

Criteria Poor Good Average Excellent Score

The content lacks a central
theme, clear point of view
Content
and logical sequence of
(30 points)
information.
0-9 points
The project presents long
Editing Score video sequences with no
(30 points) obvious editing.
0-9 points
The events in the
Script/Storyboard production seem not be in
(20 points) a cohesive order.
0-7 points
The audio is either
overpowering or way too
soft. Environmental noise
Audio Score
or secondary audio makes
(20 points)
it almost impossible to
hear the primary audio.
0-7 points
Some of the supporting
information does not seem to fit
the main idea or appears as a
disconnected series of scenes
with no unifying main idea.
10-18 points
The video appears to be
minimally or sloppily edited,
there are awkward transitions
between scenes.
10-18 points
Some scenarios lack transitions
resulting in some lapses with
regards to the order of events.
8-12 points
There are some environmental
noises that distract the audience
and/or the audio has inconsistent
volume.
8-12 points
Information is presented as a connected
theme with accurate, current supporting
information that contributes to
understanding the project's main idea.
19-24 points
The video is generally well-edited, but
lacks some continuity and polish, and
there are few or no awkward transitions
between scenes.
19-24 points
Scenes are chronologically ordered, and
smooth transitions from one scene to
another are evident.
13-16 points
The primary audio can be easily heard.
The project effectively mixes some
different types of audio.
13-16 points
The content includes a clear statement
of purpose or theme and is creative,
compelling and clearly written. A rich
variety of supporting information in
the video contributes to understanding
the project's main idea.
25-30 points
The video has a professional
appearance and the video is edited in a
way that makes the project interesting.
25-30 points
The whole story has a plot leading to a
spontaneous transition of every scenes.
17-20 points
The project appropriately mixes
different types of audio and has
extreme clarity.
17-20 points

Form No.: TSU-VPA-SF-07 Revision No.: 00 Effectivity Date: June 22, 2016 Page 1 of 1
 TARLAC STATE UNIVERSITY
VICE PRESIDENT FOR ACADEMIC AFFAIRS
The video uses more than one
The video project uses Various forms of media are highly
form of media but demonstrates The video uses multiple forms of media
only one form of media integrated, and the choice of media
Media Use poor integration of the media. and the choice of media is often
(images, audio, video, strongly contributes to the overall
(20 points) The choice of media is often appropriate for the project.
text). work.
inadequate or inappropriate.
0-7 points 8-12 points 13-16 points 17-20 points
Graphics and appearances
Graphics sometimes enhance the Graphics and appearances reinforce Graphics and appearances
Graphics and are unrelated to the story.
presentation. Images are medium content and demonstrate functionality. enhance meaning. Images are high
Appearances Images have low
resolution. Images are high resolution. resolution, eye-catching.
(20 points) resolutions.
0-7 points 8-12 points 13-16 points 17-20 points
Text and title are poorly Titles and text detract from Titles and text lack in a few places, but Titles and text add something special
Titles and Text composed or filled with trailer, as they add little to overall, they do not greatly detract from to the trailer, and do not detract from
(10 points) errors. nothing to the overall trailer. the trailer. overall trailer.
0-2 points 3-5 points 6-8 points 9-10 points

TOTAL

Date Submitted: November 28, 2019

Prepared by:

Mr. Henry M. Andres

Faculty, Department of English Language Studies

Noted by:

Dr. Brendalyn A. Manzano Dr. Aloysius T. Madriaga

Chairperson, Department of English Language Studies Dean, College of Arts and Social Sciences

Form No.: TSU-VPA-SF-07 Revision No.: 00 Effectivity Date: June 22, 2016 Page 1 of 1