Pediatric
ur ery International
© Springer-Verlag 1990
helpful in management decisions, especially in the pres- requiring weeks to months of intensive care and parenteral
ence of extra-abdominal TB. nutritional support as well as multiple operative pro-
Contrary to previous reports, most of the Mantoux tests cedures. Definitive surgery for the fistulae and strictures
were positive. Where recorded, the erythrocyte sedimenta- was delayed until nutritional parameters had been restored
tion rate was raised and anaemia was present in nearly all and at least 8 weeks of anti-TB drug therapy had been
cases. Low serum albumin in 86% also confirms the poor given.
nutritonal state of these patients, which probably indicates Abdominal TB is classically divided into peritoneal
both a population at risk and the effects of a debilitating (wet and dry, lymph node) and enteric forms according to
disease. the predominent pathology [1]. However, there is often
Colonoscopy and biopsy has been advocated as a diag- significant overlap in any one patient. In the surgical group
nostic modality, but its use is restricted to suspected enteric of peritoneal TB (22 cases), all made a rapid recovery after
TB of the colon and ileo-caecal region [12]. Laparoscopy diagnostic biopsy except 1) where bowel was entered and a
has been recommended for diagnosis, but because of mul- fistula developed, and 2) with complete bowel obstruction
tiple adhesions and bowel matting laparotomy and open who required lysis of serosal tuberculomatous adhesions.
biopsy have been preferred [15]. In those patients presenting to the paediatricians peritoneal
In the surgical group with abdominal disease histologi- TB was more common, although clinical differentiation
cal confirmation should be obtained before embarking on between the ascitic form and the adhesive form was indis-
long-term anti-TB therapy. To emphasize this point, the tinct. Ascites was present in 33% and in 2 cases was chy-
records of 30 cases of abdominal lymphoma seen at our lous in nature. Predominantly nodal TB (16 surgical cases)
hospital during the same 10-year period were reviewed. In was not associated with complications in this series, al-
7 of these ATB was the initial clinical diagnosis; 3 received though adhesive obstructions are commonly described
anti-TB therapy for 1, 2, and 1.5 months before crescendo [3, 7].
symptoms prompted referral for laparotomy and open bi- Enteric TB was found throughout the gastro-intestinal
opsy. All 3 had massive tumour load at the time of diagno- tract. In the acute phase perforation, haemorrhage, or pro-
sis. Similarly, of the 50 surgical cases seen lymphoma tein-losing enteropathy were the predominant presenta-
could not be confidently excluded on clinical grounds in tions. Although many patients initially had incomplete ob-
most, as the presenting symptoms of both diseases are stuction, nearly all healed completely without sequelae,
variable and non-specific and were only helpful in localis- strictures requiring surgery in only 4 cases. In 2 of these, 6
ing the disease to the abdomen. and 13 strictures were identified respectively and required
Thus, indications for surgery were: (1) to obtain tissue multiple resections and stricture-plasties [6, 9]. Perforation
for histopathological diagnosis, either by extra-abdominal of the bowel occurred in the acute phase in only 2 cases and
nodal biopsy or the smallest possible laparotomy to obtain was delayed in a further 2, but resulted in the greatest
a representative sample of involved peritoneum or lymph morbidity (Table 4). The perforation may be localised and
node; (2) exploratory laparotomy for acute complications; confined by matted bowel loops, the resulting abscess pre-
and (3) definitive management of complications, e.g. senting as an area of inflammatory oedema of the abdomi-
fistulae, stricture, and obstruction. nal wall initially. If untreated, it may discharge either into
One-half of the patients had a purely diagnostic lapa- adjacent bowel or externally, most commonly adjacent to
rotomy and biopsy. In this situation one must be particu- the umbilicus [2]. Free perforation with acute peritonitis
larly careful on entering the abdomen, as the peritoneum is was rare and usually implied extensive enteric involvement
thickened and oedematous and adherent to the abdominal and a degree of distal obstruction. At operation in the
wall. On two occasions bowel was inadvertently opened untreated child, minimal dissection should be performed.
during a diagnostic laparotomy; 1 patient developed an Although simple closure has been advocated, if there is
enterocutaneous fistula. No other complications were extensive involvement it might be wiser to exteriorize the
noted in this group and all responded rapidly to drug ther- affected loop [11]; a controlled fistula is then achieved.
apy. Prior to closure of the stoma a distal loopogram is done to
Great care must be taken at laparotomy in separating identify strictures that can be dealt with at the same time.
bowel loops or obtaining representative lymph node biop- Dissection of bowel loops at initial surgery is likely to
sies. Two referred cases following exploratory laparotomy result in fistulae discharging through a dehisced wound -
done elsewhere for non-specific symptoms developed mul- 2 of our cases required months of intensive care and paren-
tiple entero-cutaneous fistulae. Once a fistula or faecal teral nutrition. Both cases required operative resection of
collection is apparent, management is along established the fistulae, release of adhesions, and resection of distal
lines with adequate drainage of intra-abdominal collec- strictured bowel before a satisfactory outcome was
tions, parenteral nutritional support, antibiotics for abdom- achieved. Bypass procedures are not recommended [7].
inal wall cellulitis and peritonitis, as well as anti-TB drug Although none of the children presenting to the surgi-
therapy. These are usually high-output fistulae because of cal unit died and recurrence of disease after full therapy has
distal bowel obstruction. As oral medication was initially not occurred, the resources required to treat complicated
precluded in this group, we used intravenous rifampicin disease are immense. Thus, emphasis must be laid not only
and intramuscular streptomycin initially. Quadruple oral on prevention in the first instance, which is a priority
drug therapy was instituted as soon as possible and strepto- public health item in most developing countries, but also
mycin discontinued. The patients developing complica- on early diagnosis and treatment. The spectrum of presen-
tions (perforation/obstruction) were all very ill, with many tation is varied, TB being the great mimicker. Any child
396
with a b d o m i n a l symptoms and a distended abdomen, par- 4. Gilinsky NH, Marks IN, Kottler RE, Price SK (1983) Abdominal
ticularly if showing evidence of m a l n u t r i t i o n or c o m i n g tuberculosis. S Afr Med J 64:849 - 857
5. Johnson CAC, Hill ID, Bowie MD (1987) Abdominal tuberculosis in
from an e n d e m i c area or i m m i g r a n t population, should be
children. A survey of cases at the Red Cross War Memorial Chil-
j u d g e d to have A T B until proven otherwise. Not only must dren's Hospital, 1976- 1985, SAfr Med J 72: 20-22
other pathology, e.g. l y m p h o m a or C r o h n ' s disease, be 6. Katariya RN, Sood S, Rao PG, Rao PLNG (1977) Stricture-plastyfor
excluded, but to e m b a r k on treatment without a firm diag- tubercular strictures of the gastro-intestinal tract. Br J Surg 64:
nosis c o n d e m n s the patient to either protracted unneces- 496-498
sary treatment or to delay in the true diagnosis [14]. Thus, 7. Koopoor VK, Sharma LK (1988) Abdominal tuberculosis (leading
article). Br J Surg 75: 2 - 3
no apology is made for early recourse to laparotomy. The 8. Palmer KR, Patil DH, Basran GS, Riordan JF, Silk DBA (1985)
prognosis is excellent if treatment is c o m m e n c e d early in Abdominal tuberculosis in urban Britain - a common disease. Gut
the course of the disease, mortality b e i n g associated with 26: 1296-1305
generalised disease. With supportive care and appropriate 9. Pujari BD (1979) Modified surgical procedures in intestinal tuber-
surgery complications can be successfully managed. culosis. BrJ Surg 66:180 181
10. Segal I, Ou Tim L, Mirwis J, Meiring J, Hamilton DG, Mannek A
Acknowledgements. The authors thank Ms. J. Melis for correlation of (1981) Pitfalls in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal tuberculosis. Am J
data and Ms. P. Ball for typing of the manuscript. Gastro-entero175: 30- 35
11. Sweetman WR, Wise RA (1959) Acute perforated tuberculous enter-
itis: surgical treatment. Ann Surg 149: 143-148
12. Tam PKH, Saing H, Lee JMH (1986) Colonoscopy in the diagnosis
References of abdominal tuberculosis in children. Austr Paediatr J 22:143 - 144
13. Taylor SP, Benatar SR (1989) The tuberculosis control programme
1. Bruckstein AG (1988) Abdominal tuberculosis. NY State J Med 88: - a time to re-evaluate? Editorial. S Afr Med J 76:639-640
18-21 14. Wald A (1987) Enteric tuberculosis: literature review. Mt Sinai J
2. Davies MRQ (1982) Abdominal tuberculosis in children. S Afr J Med (NY) 54: 443- 449
Surg 20: 7-19 15. Wolfe JHN, Behn AR, Jackson BT (1979) Tuberculous peritonitis
3. Foulkner RL (1964) Tuberculosis as a surgical disease of the abdo- and role of diagnostic laparoscopy. Lancet i: 852- 853
men. Ann Surg 160:806-813