htm
The dakhiometry
L'évolution de l'univers
La passion
et l'amour des
objets délicats...
L'Art magnifique du
Lointain des Rêves
en Miniatures...
It's worth seeing... >
Algebra irrationality.
The Archimedes' Property is the root of the Algebra irrationality.
Changing forms?
It is the Absolute Space main characteristic
done according to the Matter Conservation principle.
If you are the most closely concerned, please, click on this following
link:
in this web site so many actual reasons that point out this
Mathematics big false conceptions with Numbers.
So, while staying on the spot I would like to go further for so
much more true important problems that sciences yet ignore
than, to have an unceasing chat with Mathematics self-absorbed
behavior about their own quite particular irrational closed loop
fantasy.
In conclusion
Mathematicians ignore themselves that Mathematics is a most
greatest man's Empirical Work, their first attempt of science.
However they are missing the science gate entrance and science
is now as a big fantasie growing world, the technology door.
The just concept is really one unique cercle. The figure of a circle is no
Arithmetics and Algebra and also for the Analytic Geometry is that these
methods rest on the basis of the Number invention. From there, as
Numbers seems to be the Archetype of the universe, Mathematics try to
describe anything in nature as being in space.
Note that Numbers can be basically represented with the Integer series.
On any numerical base, we can represent Numbers as:
1, 2, 3,..., x,..., n.
For example,
nth root of (x)
can designates the whole Numbers series. This means that it is
designating nothing.
However, this is the basic difficulty and obstacle for the Mathematics
using Numbers as tool as means for representing the universe even by
abstraction. It is because from any given Number (x), there is no simple
equation as for example from a given:
(x)n
The reason is that going from one point (A) to the (B) one, it doesn't
suffice to be a point characteristic. A Number (x)n can't give directly an
(x) that is quite different to the [(x)n] position on anywhere of the
Number series.
In fact, the circle remains still unknown. Really, the Geometry was
formed on the belief that the universe heavenly bodies is floating in
Nothingness. The Platoo copass is only a mechanical system that can
produce a Practical-figure denoted as a circle or rather a wheel. The
first intuition of Geometry was done from empirical observations.
The dividing any angle is from a natural spatial structure like the
Squaring a Circle. That is the fact of a circle as completly formed by a
CONTNUITY OF ANGLE SUCCESSION. As a Line is formed as a
continuity of preseeding-and-succeeding Point, the perimeter of circle is
rationally defined as a succeeding-and-preceeding Element-of-angle.
On a circle, any not-an-element-angle can be formed as an angle
quantity that can be divided, particularly by Trisection division.
Therefore, with the spatial-language it can be spatially constructed this
division and also by the whole 4-opertions.
This was proved in Dakhiometry fundamentally like was is done for the
squaring a Circle. An angle is there defined as a given point of a circle
that can "see" a same given Arc value on this circle. More generally, as
Euclide's intuitively see it, there are really ONE CIRCLE in the universe.
Therefore, an angle is an ABSOLUTE QUANTITY, independently to any
figure form for example independenly to the Homothetie influence. Due
to the Discretness of matter, any angle transformation is done also as
rational determined quantity. Any angle transformation can be
constructed with the Spatial Language.
The mathematics behind the impossibility of squaring the circle is the just
understanding of this proof event. It is the event of true and real space
understanding from there human can get unbounded knowledge on the
wealthy of universal life. A such knowledge is necessarily unlimited as
the construction of universal laws are. It is how to access the human
capacity of deductive though, a mode of universal laws construction
according to aborscence process. This latter is like the sphere property of
how to grow and extend from a center to build its peripherical surface not
because a dependence of some center pressure but according to the
surface enrichment resulting from arborescence process.
I'm sorry. It should be: radius = Radius of a circle. I'm confusing it with
the light rays shining from a Solar center.
Note
Because of some confusion in Search and Replace key, there is some
extended not optimal world in this text. Please, the most easyest means
for a temporarily equilibrium is to note this following world convention:
"area" = aera
These are human words. However its have a quite rational meaning.
Because the suqring a circle is the key of mastering space knowledge. We
human are not closed up on a planet even if the Earth is for us a most
actractive cradle. It is why understanding the space matter through the
Space Constant allows us to enter in the heaven to enlighten more justlty
You know it the origin of the impossible law coming from the last
centuries where mathematicians became impotent in geometric resolution
of some problem. The origin comes from the epoch where mathematic
diverged into usual use of conventional language to measure space with
the possibility to expresse space with numeric expressions. This a quite
imprecise method and doesn't fit with the universe space element
precision. Thus with the squaring a circle, the angle trisection and the
doubling a cube, mathematicians telle that any number can fit with such
problem resolutions. Thus is impossible what can't be constructed withe
only the compass and the edge. And number that are used to measure
such impossibility is somme irrationnal and transcendental ones. Here is
the real repudiation of space by the human number language. The real
orign of such gulf between space elements with the human number
language worlds was from Pythagore that have a great devotion with his
number inventions.
Only the squaring a circle can give the Space Constant with which a real
vast gate is opened for allowing to enter in the matter space of the
universe. A simple example is how it allows to know by deduction aeras
and volumes of solid forms. The notion of the old Pi is far from such
possibilities.
I resolve the squaring a circle during spring 1982. It took me about least
than one week (exactely 3 days) to reach a convinced solution of the
squaring by spatial figures. However, I need approximately two months to
turn over and over around it to have a steady and clear valid solution.
The reciprocal of the squaring a circle was discovered during this period.
Then after that, I have to do bibliographic works to have a global view of
what was done about the Pi and the squaring a circle all along its history.
Note that because I did not have a clear idea on the anciant's works on
the squaring a circle that I succeeded easily to resolve this problem. It is
because I had no preconception and was standing before a virgin field
where I had to create everything for thinking. I can't talk about and
reveal my discover of the squaring solution to anybody. Everybody in
scientific world are deaf as a post about a such problem and also I prefer
to do not being bored stiff and then to be qualified as raving mad. Some
more long years was needed to really understand and to construct the
real basic proof of the Squaring a circle phenomenon in the universe. It
consists to prove the equality of surface of two different figure forms. It
is due to my knowledge on the basis of circle properties. The result in the
present days, is to know many ways of how to construct a squaring a
circle and a most important aspect is how to use and apply the different
modes of the Space Constant to resolve multiple rational and precise
space problems. The rich consequences of this Constant is truly endless.
It is really the key of rational space knowledge, physically and
mathamatically.
Pie was produced by cooker before the term Pi come to any thinking.
Thus, it was the proof of an anterior invention of "e" for a lunch before a
good scientific research for Pi.
- pi + ying (Japan)
Conclusion
Any operation needs a precise determined quantity. A rational number is
precisely characterized by a precise quantity. The precision property is
both a Begining together with an End. Note that according to this
definition, a Circle is a rational form.
An irrational number if there, is never ended. It means that it is never a
precise quantity number.
Therefore, rationally done, any irrational number is a ghost and then can
never produce any transformation into a (z).
Therefore, one should find this logic structure in space locations that are
common for these figures, after their transformation. This is the reasons
to paid attention at the intersection points of the circle and the square of
same surfaces.
Fig-1
Here on the left of this figure, are the circle and the square after a
surface form change.
2 - With relations between these points, one should compute the red
triangle, on the left. There is more of this triangle deduced from the
central symmetry of the whole figure. This triangle will be expressed
as functions of the lengths c, a and b of the triangle, draw on the right
of the figure.
- prooving + pi (Isreal)
- "descirbe" + pi + determined (Australia) Spposed that for example, a triangle can make a square from a
circle. From this result, there is no new idea, no new concept that can be revealed from space. In this case the
fundamental question is : where does come from a triangle ? What is the postulate for a triangle and the
consequences of this postulate ? Then somebody can invalidate this squaring a circle through the triangle, by
proving prooving that the triangle need angle definition. Because angle definition is only precisely defined by
the perpendicularity in a right angle. And where come from a right triangle ? Also there, a right angle is one
property of the circle ! And where come from a circle ? Here our thought meets a logic crossroads and a circle
is a direct Space Postulate : the circle is not a form. The circle is precisely the PERMANENCE REMNANT.
Therefore, as a square has precisely this right angle property then, a triangle that creates a square, is a
TAUTOLOGY. Consequently, a triangle that allows to create a square from a circle is an illusion of
anthropomorphic thinking type.
Now, why does on the figure-1 one can see a triangle in a circle ? The basic conscience is to see there only the
consequence of an ALREADY RESOLVED squaring a circle. Because we got the square directely from the circle
then, we can examine this finished construction for the purpose of measurement analysis. It is the real case
from that we can get the next formula of the Space Constant.
a2 + b2 = c2
- astronomical intersection
(airtelbroadband.in, India)
/Fullmetal-Alchemist-TAF-2009-circle.jpg)
understanding of an Angle?
Really.
It consists to discover the Just-Stone and
simply to put it at the Just-Place... -
Philosopher's + Stone + Transmutation +
Circle (comcast.net)
- Philosopher +Stone+Transmutation+Circle
(sbcglobal.net, Texas)
Fig-2
The symmetric
positions of the
two great circles
show any
relationships
that allows to
place the same
little circle C1 in
the different
precise locations
of the figure.
Particularly we
can note that :
L2 = R of C1
(Singapore, http://theebradmiller.webs.com
/photos/-Blood-Diaries-amp-Sigils
/transmutationZ22Z.jpg)
Actually.
This is the true notation for a such space-Key
that allow the unlimited understanding of the
universe space. This latter is the human
intrinsic property that allows to get the real
living for everybody. The basic understanding
of the universe Facts is to have a good
understanding on the whole space. This latter
is no more than the true being language of
life for the multiplicity.
Until now Mathematics methods are quite
ignoring what is Space because they ignore
that human knowledge needs a Key playing
the role of a true philosopher-stone. This
latter is no more than a necessary Key to
open the knowledge gate.
It is why mathematicians can't resolve the
basic three mathematic problems of the
squaring-a-circle, the trisection-of-an-angle
and the duplication-a-cube. Because we have
to know what are the common "impossibility"
points between these three problems.
Precisely, these three mathematic
impossibilities is due to the ignorance of the
space knowledge transmutation owing to a
real "philosopher's stone".
These three mathematicians' impossibilities
are due to the ignorance of the CURVILINEAR
SPACE property!
On may note that the Dakhiometry can
precisely resolve these above three basic
problems -and more- because it is perfectly
defined there the space as having the LINEAR
and CURVILINEAR main properties.
Practical Example:
L2 = R of C1
- mathmatic (Korea)
Fig-3
1 - In this figure, we can see that L1 is equate to the half of a
diagonal of a square of an edge of length C
Note for someones that he can not prove that there are somme
mathematical errors in my proves. This is because I can prove them in
different ways that yield sames results.
Now, to show that I have proved the equality of lenght [L1] let us
resume the anterior figure of an anterior text where it is shown how
[L1] is equal to the half of the diaginal diagonal of the square of side
|c].
- mathmatic (Mongolia)
- history + Pithagoras
For circles
|A] + [B] = [C]
These relations are deduced from analysis of the squaring the circle.
The conclusion is that [L1] is the side of the square inscribed in the
circle [C] .
Now, with a simple new effort, you may double this square of side
[L1]. Thus, you get the square of side [c] that is the square
circumscribed of the cercle [C]. Consequently,
b = L3 - L2
L1 = (1/2).(c).(sqr(2))
Note that [sqr(...)] means Square Root of the number in the following
parenthesis.
L3 = (1/2).(a + b)
L1 = (1/2).(c).(sqr(2))
L2 = R of C1
L3 = (1/2).(a + b)
Fig-4
The diagonal of a square circumscribed
to circle C has a known difference [d]
with its edge. This is the diameter [d]
of the circle C'1.
C'1 = C1
- pi circle (Argentina)
Actually.
"Minh vector" is significant to "enlightenment vector"
Exactly.
This Space-calcultator is an authentic spatial-structure creation to
get the solution.
One can note that all the Squaring a Circle method, are done
successfully according and certainly only to the Dakhiometry
method of space-structure creations!
It is the real Dakhiometry method that has nothing to do with the
current Mathematics.
It is justly tell.
Universal laws have only to read themselves to construct. It is noted
that human should also read the self to know the universe.
As you notice it, all the work are done with compass-straightedge
concept.
This means that the circle give to us the Constancy for defining the
different between speed of movement. It is to tell, there is no TIME, the
millenary belif illusion of man.
Note that difference of movement is expressed as the Speed or velocity
(Length/Time). This is no more than a conventional based speed stated
on the conventional unreal Time. A, universal constant Length, allows to
rationally express the movement characteristic that we know as speed.
This is the most exact concept definition for this new spatial
method. In Dakhiometry, there is a complete spatial mode for
calculation using spatial elements for exact determination of
spatial structure quantities. The whole 4 operations are easily
used for figure calculation. The Dakhiometry is not belonging to
Mathematics that are no more than a heap of huge complicated
Tricks and Receipes using Numbers Literatures. On must be in
conscience on the retardation of this empirical Mathematics.
Quantity ans Space is ignored in Mathematics even if these
"words" is in everyday use. It is the main condition to be abble to
The fact is that most of visitors are always crying to their famous
"Archimedes' Pi" proves that practical everybody hasn't some
understanding on what it is exposed here!
This above construction for calculating the Pi value from the spatial
strucure, is a one that I had used for a more best understanding with
mathematicians and their usual methods and their eternal and mystic
pythagorean theorem.
However the Dakhiomatry methods are more general than the usuel
Mathematics tricks and receipes. The true initial Dakhiometry
calculations are done directly from the method denoted as the
Dakhiometry Calculator Structure. Here next is shown an example of its
application to clarify a given problem analysis.
However, this new true concept is difficult to be understood. We are
used with Time from along all millenaries and also the circle is not yet
well know by most of mathematicians, particular by everybody on Earth!
Help... ?
- pi + in + maths (Turkey)
Actually. It is the basic purpose of the squaring a circle and is not only
for simple internal relationships of a circle. But not only for the
fundamental circle but it is a key for wealthy consequences in the
understanding of the whole space Forms.
- sumatori + pi + formula
Actually.
What mathematical formula don't use Pi.
- Mathmatic (Mongolia)
This is true. Because the bases are only from ratio and construction.
???
Sorry to tell you, that for the Dakhiometry the Irrationallity is only
from Mathematics Ignorance due to its false belief on Artificial
Numbers system.
It is time for everyone to be abble to rcognize that all the
Dakhiometry proceed on Spatial Language using only Spatial
elements. If one was formated by Old Bad Mathematics Dogma he
will still remains ever in the Nothingness as irrationally pious. It is
useless for him to acquaint the Dakhiometry Spatial Constant.
WHAT IS GIVEN HERE IS STRICTLY THE REASONS FOR FIGURING
OUT THE UNIQUE SPATIAL CONSTANT LENGTH IN THE ABSOLUTE
UNIVERSE SPACE!!!
A Length is for ever a CONSTRUCTIBLE THING !!!
(Pakistan)
- is pi rational (Hungary)
Actually.
Consequently:
Rational construction is done by interaction of matter with the capacity
of being related between them in defined relationships. For example,
Solving the Squaring a Circle is the beginning of:
2) - Knowing rationally these basic laws, defining any Aerea and any
form Volume are the direct consequences. They are needed to
define their necessary Mass center property.
Archimedes's Pi, how can they do to know not only precisely but
with what method are they proceed with to resolve the Squaring a
Ssphere and how do they to define precisely the necessary need on
Form characteristics both in theory and in technology?
... 2012
Fantastic go ahead!
Finally,
The Impossibility of the Squaring a Circle and of the Angle-
Trisection, anf The so-called Irrationality and Trancendental of
Number, are due to this next reason:
The most practical problem is to know that this Constant is a key for
understanding the diffrent Form Volumes and then used for mastering
their Mass-Center.
This is the true modern vast practical consequences from this basic
Spatial Constant initially considered by the Anciants as simply used to
resolve the Circle perimeter. This was only to define the First application
problem meet by builders: How to get a good measurement on circles
for conceiving big monuments.
- http://www.picstopin.com/524/the-rational-new-pi-accurate-value-
resolution (t-ipconnect.de)
- pi + calculator (Taiwan)
- squaringcircle (Finland)
More,
The irrationality of the Anciant's Pi suffers from an another big
Ignorance that is the the One about the circular form. A Circle
defined by a compas-mechnism is also an another No-Tning invented
by Mathematics to hide the Mathematics ignorance on the universe
Circularity Fact. Thus, even if in Mathematics there was invented a
prcise definition system another than the Numbers to describe the
continuity of Quantity, the fact of ignorinhg the Circularity imply that
necessary, a Mathematics Pi is nécessary an irrational Thing.
Finally, what about the Space Continuity (but not the Continuum
one)?
Therefore,
When one define a given Point (P), this definition necessary define
precisely any Point-between-two-other-defined-Points. That is the
fundamental definition of the universal Continuity of matter or ITS
PRECISE TRUE QUANTITY Definition.
In conclusion
2) - In fact, the Space reality rest only on the Point. Therefore, Line
and Curves are formed with Points. And in the universe Discrete
Matter Point is the Elemental matter dimension according to the
uniqueness principle. There is not one Not-a-Point in the universe.
This is the basic property of the Spatial Language.
Conclusion
The Dakhiometry is based strictly on the use of the spatial language
as the the true representation of the Space Realities.
The Pi length is determine as defined point to point line. Therefore
this Pi length is fully defined as quantity of spatial Points. the
Squaring a Circle solution is here from pure Spatial Langauge
resolution. The Pi is then always quite defined quantity of Points in a
defined Segment of Length.
no reason-behavior.
Therefore, proving the Not-a-Point will be transformed into the result
of an contradictory eternal Impossibility-Theorem. Note that it is
excluded from there the Euclide's Infinite Line because it is only from
Euclide's chimera.
I am sory,
because Mathematics of Numbers fact is a proof of Black Hole reality
and inversely.
- formul + pi + geometric,
- pi + are + rea + geetrik (otenet.gr, Greece) - pi + are + real +
geetrik (Greece)
In summary.
One can logically determine only the Shortest distance from any
determined-location to a set of another ones in the whole
universe space.
Note
If this latter statement is difficult for the understanding of usual
mind formed by Relativity as the Dynamics and its modern
derivatives ones, I give here an simple example using the current
welknown Number system.
So, do you know why Numbers begin only from (1) (but not from
Zero. Because Zero-represents-No-Quantity (the Zero is not-a-
number)?
Conseqently:
The Euclide's Line that begin to grow from Infinity and is
"restricted" between and by two Infinities is necessary a from usual
man's chimera !
In fact:
The Squaring-a-Circle proves that the Ratio (Pi =
Perimeter/Diameter) is from empirical irrelevent technique tempting
by the Anciants trying to resolve the impossible problem of a circle
perimeter measurement.
On should note that the Length "Pi" id only possible by obtaining the
Ratio-Of-Aeras. It is why to get the Length Constant Langth, on
should resilve the Mythical Sqyaring the Circle. Mathematic can
NEVER resolve the Squaring the Circle and more resolvin the
compareason bt reasuring the Diameter of circle. The Basic Reason is
that MATHEMATIC IS FOR EVER IGBORING THE CIRCUKARITY,
therefore, the Diameter of Circle. This ignorance is the source of the
Impossibilty of the Mathematic to resove the Squaring the Circle!
- Boston + MA (Massachusetts)
- http://imgarcade.com/1/pie-math-formula/"
- pi + equations (camcastbusiness.net))
Really, this structure of the Space is concretly and fully telling the Pi
equation. One have only to read it.
- proof of pi (Turkey)
It can be get when one is familar with circle property and also when
one is convinced that the universe is structured strictly by
Circles.
Then from there it can be seen that the Beginning of the Universe
Construction happens only from Circles and not mixted with Lines and
any another form. Because the Beginning of the univeres is starting
from FORLESS Universe of Matter. Therefore, only from Circles are
born the first matter forms denoted as the Squares.
From there was setting the linear aspect of the universe Space.
Really, the Dakhiometry can prove fully in "Top, Bottom, Left, Right,
Front, Back, Inside and Outside View", in Virtual and Real aspects of
this Squaring Circle as the Passage from the Permanent Circular to
Homogeneous and Isotropric properties of the universe Space.
The Squaring the Circle as the Beginning of the universe is not and
utopia.
This solution of the Squaring the Circle starting only from the Circle
was not exposed here in this web site because it is difficult for usual
mathematicians to have somme clear insight of the pure circular
property. The squaring a Circle will then be seen as a true JOKE for
Kids.
The fact is that the irrationallity and the Impossibility are not from
the Univers space properties. These bed of sickness is simply lodged
in the mathematicians thought.
In summary:
When, according to the Empirical euclidean stating that
""Figures Equality = Figures in Superposition"",
one tempts to associate by successive-points contact between the
Circle-and-the-Straight-Line ones then, Man should be disolved into
tears.
Corollary:
I) - The Irrationallity is ONLY the one from human error and also to
- yangtzeu (China)
... le Golden-River...
- the-rational-new-pi-accurate-value-resolution (Gabon)
After getting the square (K) from the Squaring construction, it needs to
be included into a general space structure denoted as the Dakhiometry
Calculator Structure. It is a spatial structure which has the wealthy
property of the universe Space Matter.
The Calculator structure consists to create and obtain the matter central
symmetry property. It is done by 90° rotation at four times to the
square (K) around the center (O) of the golden circle (C1). There the
Calculator gives to us, directly and simply any factor needed to
determine the precise Pi formula.
In fact this formula is deduced from the rectangle with given
sides L2 and L3. There, L1, L2 and L3 are perfectly and simply
determined by this structure.
Therefore, there is no problem. The Dakhiometry Calculator had done its
job!
Note
The Spatial Calculator is an unbounded wealthy means for many other
calclations... if one is mastering the Dakhiometry Spatial Language.
We can see that a just space structure can determine by itself the
needed solution. The squaring a circle is really an auto-transformation
event in the space.
EB = AD = a = L2 + L3
The calculator structure give directly that L1 is no more than the square
side length inscribed in the circle (C) And finally it can be get easily
without searching tricks:
You are informed that the Angle Trisection is also resolved by this
type of neat and simple resolution. There is an important remark
about science methods:
This is not the case for the millenary Algebraic formalism with all
its modern complicated formula. Necessary, these latter will soon
put the Algebaric Mathematics on the spot, where this science will
be lost in its unavoidable growing complications.
Until now the formula for the Circle and Sphere concerning their
Perimeters and Aeras, are found ONLY by trial-Error.
Inversely,
From a given Sphere of diameter (D),
Consequences:
Therefore,
there is never complex construction (as alive creatures) inside the
internal volume of any heavenly body where production of rotation
energy is necessary under its extrema plus-or-minus.
Religion Belivers.
On this next figure, the square (L2) perimeter is the exact measurement
of the Circle (C) perimeter.
It is equality not according to the Euclide's empirical
Superposition but by Real Rational Transformation of figures.
- "http://ugadyvubymy.net84.net/perpendicular-symbole-
in-mathematics.php" (Taiwan)
It is because,
In summary:
- dragster + car
3) - Each point of the wheel perimeter in motion have its own inertia
effort.
- pi + value (Philippines)
- rational + pi (Germany)
Dakhiometry Theorem:
This theorem is Practically done as follows:
Note
One get the square root and its inverse of any length situated
from 0 to 1 using this same theorem.
How the Dakhiometry Lamca theorem allows to get simply the following
ratios:
Thus, on any any dimension of this following figure, it can verify what is the
Universal Space Constant.
Sory, but
The Dakhiometry is not a Religion but the true human rational science
Fundamental basis
c) - We get then the unique (AH) that is the diameter (AH) of the circle
unique solution of the problem.
This is really a spatial calculator that can calculate both the circles
correponding to the aera or the perimeter of any square. It is
according to the Transformation Constants of the squaring a circle.
Any point (X) on the line (JH) has the same and unique line (JH)
as its PERPENDICULAR direction to a given line (AF). It is because
any given Angle, for example a perpendicular Angle, is an unique
Quantity.
In conclusion
The Squaring a Circle, the Trisection of an Angle and other so-called
impossible Mathematics problems are due to this wrong concept that the
Squaring a Circle and the Trisection of an Angle belong to the
mathematicians Realm system itself. It is wrong to belive that it suffice
to a Mathematicians to drawn figures and thus, they will a day resolve
these problems.
Therefore, with a such problem statement, the man thinking can stay
ouside of the Whole universe. One can then construc a logic plan that
will show where is the Input and the output of the Squaring a Circle.
This latter problem of the figuring out a circle with a same square
perimeter illustrates clearly that the Output solution is found because
whe have the Input of it. We are standing in the right logic when looking
from the outside of a transcendent system problem. Thus, any problem
of the nowaday universe should consider that the Circle will furnishe the
basic reasons for. The Circle properties are actually the root of any
problem resolution.
Important Note
The Space Constant is strictly the RATIO (AD/AH) of this
structure.
Therefore,
The TRUE SPACE CONSTANT SHOULD BE EXPRESSED (in Number form)
as:
(AD)/(AH) = 3.12019.../4 = 0.780048432857...
This is the basic Constant in ratio form used in the Circle Aera and
Perimeter.
It this this ratio value that should be used in place of any old mystic Pi,
used in any Mathamtics formula. That is to tell when being rationally
coherent, one should use in place of the alone Pi, the basic ratio
(Pi/4) expression.
Squaring the Circle is as the sky openning for the rain to fertilize the
whole Earth Science Soul Soil.
1/(0.780048432857...)= 1.28197168...
However, the Numbers are used here for mathematiciens who can know
nothing else than the simplistic artificial pythagorean Numbers.
Only the dakhi spatial language can expressed the universe precision on
Quantity. Here after a figure shows how with the spatial language, it can
be represented such fantastic Constancy of the univers Quantity. This
fact is really beyond the Mathematics impotance that are wholy
coagulated under their Number dogma.
(L2)/(L1) = 0.780048432857...
And also:
Now if this is really a Constant, its inverse value should be equal to the
length (AH), under this figure unit system.
Pi (numeric) = 3.120493733333333...
Therefore,
According to the precision of the Math-processor THERE IS
SOMETHING THAT GOES BADLY WITH THE NUMBER CALCULATION
METHOD depending to the possibility of the C.A.D. sofware with that
one use to draw. These sofwares has no need to produce high Math
decimal uses.
Right!
The little circle is exactly inscribed in the main circle quarter. This little
circle is also placed at the center of the main circle. And so on,.. there
are many other little circle placements. More the little circle is the
measurement of doubling the circle and the square fitting with a circle....
In brief, the little circle is the permanent memory of the space structure.
This the fact. Also in this basic space structure, we can find the secret
key of the Constancy of Space that allows precise absolute universal
measurements of the universe fullness.
Actually. Thank for your remark and for many other ones.
There was many remarks about this error on L2 analysis. However I
haven't understood why there is an error.
May be the error comes from a step of proof that is not detailed explicitly.
I am going to put right in the following.
This next figure is only possible AFTER the result of squaring a circle for
calculation of L1, L2 and L3 by numeral process.
R(c''1) = L2 = (1/2)[c(sqr(2)-1)].
Because of the C' radius are double of the C one. Therefore, to compare
radius of C1 to the C'1 one is equivalent to compare C1 radius to L2.
Examine this next figure. You will see unfold the rich consequences of the
circle/square structure. For example, the inscribed square in the C circle,
of side L1, is equal to the quarter of the C' one.
It is not as the old usual mathematics that institutes receipts in huge
works like any Civil Code. Then this latter is used to format the human
brain. Therefore, Mathematic are not laws but consequences of empirical
tricks compiled along the time. While the Dakhiometry knowledge method
is to practise reason deduction from most fondamental but simple real
laws to construct the complexities of the universe matter.
In brief:
* Or one should renounces the Dakhiometry and do not try to integrate it
into the old Mathematics,
* Or with an open minded one can get into the real new way of
knowledge to be abble to construct the wealthy life for everyone and for
all.
Fig-4-1
A homothetic of k=2, with center O, give C12 = 2.C1. Lengths are
only considered. Thus C12 contains two C1.
d = c (sqr(2) - 1)
radius of C1 = (1/2).(c).((sqr(2) - 1)
L1 = (1/2).(c).(sqr(2))
L2 = (1/2).(c).((sqr(2) - 1)
L3 = (1/2).(a + b)
The determination of data for a precise Pi value using the compass and
the rule is completed.
Note that along these analysis for the determination of the universal constant,
we are reading only spatial structure represented by different figures. Also,
figure are spatial matter even if they are done in coarse manners their logic
remain in our mind. Nothing of artificial or arbitrary determination was
introduced. Therefore, the value of this Constant is an authentic positive fact
and belongs really to the Permanence of the matter space.
Now we are going to finish it with calculations. Obviously the red triangle
of figure-1 is a rectangular one. Therefore Pythagoras' theorem allows to
write :
L 22 + L 23 = L 21
- is + there + a + pattern + in + Pi
- pi + accuracy
We get finally
the new natural constant of Pi and also some of its characteristics, as
follows :
- value of pi Romania
- "http://dukunprediksibola.com/the-rational-new-pi-accurate-value-
resolution"
This next above Pi under numeral formula can be purely with length
constructed as shown next in this present text. And if a Length is
considered as rational mathematic element then, Pi is necessary perfectly
Rational. - the + numberto + of +pi (sbcglobal.net, California, USA)
1) - Accuracy of 1/1000 : Pi = 3 . 12
2) - Accuracy of 1/10 000 : Pi = 3 . 12 02
3) - Calculator accuracy :
------- Pi = 3.12 01 93 73 14 31 77 5 ....
Your notes:
- "02 + pi + numbers"
- ...
( 234/75 ) = 3 . 12
perimeter = 2.Pi.R
With R the circle radius and Pi the above value.
perimeter that is a useful measure for the daily practice, however this
measure was until now an impossibility. And it is ignored that the
fundamental reason is the great contradiction between Continuum and
the practice of reality. Precisely this reality is no more than the Discreet
Matter. On this figure, in the case of figure a), one try to do what is
possible in practice that consists of measuring the circle when it rolls on a
Line. This problem was a so great mystery that on can find any thing as a
result. For example, it was found that using a process of one-to-one point
correspondence, one can prove that the infinite blue Line, is equate to the
half of the circle perimeter. Another thing is to try to paste a polygon on
the circle, until it may be confused with the circle perimeter. Any
operation is impossible according to this knowledge of continuum base.
This is because a continuous line can not be "broken" into dinstinct
points.
On the lower figure b), it is represented the same circle rolling on a road.
Now, we are in the thought of the discreet Matter. One can now applied
the one-to-one process of point to point correspondence. Therefore, the
perimeter that is composed of the out most exterior quantum of matter of
the circle surface. It can be now counted in point to point correspondence
with the straight blue "line".
Fig-4-2
Let a right triangle ABC inscribed in a
circle. On this figure 4-3, one can think
that the circle circumscribed to ABC is the
entire locus of the vertex A. But it is not
the true when A is at B or at C. The above
pastulates postulats and axioms indicate
One "thinks" Continuum and Infinity in manner so uncertain that one has
the pain to take conscience that these thoughts are not possible without
the Discontinuous of the matter. There are therefore giant theories, that
build the Continuum with the Discontinuous Facts. If one asserted that
everything is taken shape drowned in the Continuous, one however
ignores that this Continuous non-distinguished world is necessarily
constructed according from brick to brick process. Because, what is a Cut
in the Continuum of Real numbers? Why can one distinguishes "holes" in
rational numbers, while this world was supposed to be a Continuous? If
the Whole natural numbers appears in First, how can one assert that the
World is a Continuum?
One defines that the Infinite number is a number that is larger than any
given number.
Fatal contradictions:
In summary:
One finds thus, in education works the erroneous and uncertain notion :
"The infinity is a number larger than any given number".
The error is hidden under a seemingly formalism. This last masks the
unavoidable uncertainty of the Infinity notion, the philosophical or
mathematics ones, because precisely, it comes from its absence of
conscience in the human thought.
The natural just concept is the Succession that generate unbounded and
the Without-Limit notions. Thus, the real definition should be : "The
Evolution of the Life is such that, to any step of the life, there is always a
one by which, Life can go further"
This is not a theorem to prove. One can only verify it, because the
Succession is a Fact of the matter Movement, called the Recurrence.
According to this unbounded evolution, on can say that the Uniqueness is
a characteristic of the universe. The old mathematic known series are
very poor system due to language of number that drive to traps, holes,
forbidden things the most strange.
Conclusion :
Specifically,
the notion of Without-Limit can be understood as next. We suppose to be
standing on an immense plateaus of earth. Walking on this terrain, step
by step, represents the discontinuous of numbers. Then, we tell that this
terrain has a limit, if in the course of our step, the ground gives way,
because a ravine delimits the terrain. Another case, is that this immense
plateaus, has no Limit. Then, one would tell that to any number of steps
that one can make, there is always this one that one can do more
further... It is thus, the notion of the Without-Limit the same as the one
of the Absolute Liberty. It is now a problem for everyone of the human.
On the place of the Infinite word, anyone has to invent again, the just
term expressing this real Withiut Without-Limit notion that one finds in
the natural numbers series properties.
What are the view points of the Dakhiometry about this problem ?
For the Dakhiometry, matter is discret and the quantum space is
obsolutly defined. Lines are only directions determined by the motion in
the recurrent process. That is to say lines and precisely segments of line,
are only regularly succesive quantum locations in a precise direction.
Fig-4-3
Let be the intersection of the medians of
the right triangle that gives the point G.
This medians are matter and can not
appear or disappear without doing it
Practical Notes :
To see if G is at the center of gravity, one can divide each medians
into 1/3 parts. Then, one can count these parts at each side of point
G. The result must be the equality of matter between the two side of
G. on this figure, one can see that on the side GC, there is six parts
and on the side AG, there is also six parts. This means that G is the
center of gravity of matter shared along BC.
The value of space is not dependent of mass of matter. Space value are
concerning location and distance.
Because from the Anciant's time, space is nothingness. Thus any
Geometric value is not depedent to mass.
In Dakhiometry, space is concrete matter and length is a matter, thus
the question of Pi value according to mass is a valid one. However,
foundation of space matter rests on the existence of elemental
immutable matter. And this state has the property of without-
interaction because being immutable the elemental matter don't obey
to interaction laws and has no weight or mass. Thus element of space
as points and lines are pure distances absolutely located. Therefore, a
length value is an absolute one and do not depend of any another
physical factor else than as exclusively with absolute locations.
One see that with Geometric points, the Anciants cannot use Geometry
for calculation with numbers. The modern Real number series is
example of tempting to name the Continuum but unsuccesfully because
of Principle contradiction in that Continuum Conrinuum cannot be
Discretness of a Name. From there, Numbers begun to be buit as a
Is true.
The basic proof is as follows.
1) - The Symmetry is a basic property of any object in the universe.
Thus, the object center is a given data to define this object.
2) - A circle is defined by it given center plus one point of its
circumfrence.
Now, a GIVEN segment is defined by its given center and its two ends.
Therefore, necessarry, a given segment is sufficient to wholy define
a unique circle, as long as they have the same center.
Now that the Lam-Ca theorem is more familiar, it can be presented here,
another way of squaring a circle and a method of constructing a straight
segment equate to the perimeter of a circle.
This next figure shows that one tries to tell what is a circular aera by means
The proof of circle surface (S) in the following uses summation of circle
perimeters or circumferences (P) that compose it. Then, one get (P)
versus diameter (D) :
P = Pi.D
This perimeter is then a linear function of the diameters.
Consequently, any circle perimeter is function
of diameters varying from zero to any number
of the universe. Then, this perimeter (P) can
vary from zero to any number of the universe.
Particularly all these (P) numbers necessary
contains the natural Integer series beginning
from 1 to unbounded great quantities. The
figure here, shows the graph of this linear
function.
- PI + "MATEMATICS" (Slovenia)
- pi + value (Hungary)
- determination+of+the+value+of+pi (Ghana)
- pi + value (Maldive)
Actually, beginning of life was born from two matter structures that
contribute all along the universe history to furnish basic materials
and reasons developments for construction. As a Mother and a
Father are two complementary structures linked together to be able
to prepare a child, they are characterized as the yin and yang
principle of life. The two necessary circle and squarre structures
with which an unbounded way was opened. The Yin and Yang are
not ideology but only observations of the reality of the universal life
possibilities extending on heavenly globe bodies that fit to physic
conditions.
CIRCUMFERENCE PREAMBLE
- how to calculate the sinusoidal graph for day duration for Melbourne
(Australia)
Actually, concerning Melbourne, all the Earth seasons are the reversed
ones as shown on this next figure. The day duration with a good
approximation, may be considered with the Earth considered as a perfect
sphere. It is because on any Earth latitude, the day cycle is the same.
Fot the equinox in Spring and Autumn the Earth pole axis is in a plane
perpendicular to the Sun radius. This produce an equi-axis Earth distance
from the Sun. Therefore, the 24H circle duration is divided in two equal
parts for the day and night perimeter lengths.
- the root of all action square root of two (bell.ca, Toronto, Canada)
You have get an insight of action practice. So, plough more further to
gather in the crops.
Remind
y = (------------------>)
We have seen that the squaring a circle is done using a space Constant.
Then we can know how to transform any circular line into a straight one
and inversely.
C = P.(pi/4)
Dakhiometry theorem
Inversely,
2) - Theorem of the square perimeter
The perimeter of a square is equal to the perimeter of the circle of diameter
equal to the square one, time the inverse space Constant (4/pi).
Practical Exercice
From a given point marked on the ground, it is asked to two or
many children to have to placed themselves around this point.
They will do in such manner that they expressed by their location
what is the meaning of this point on the ground as a Central Point.
It is to say that the children have tp expresse their feeling about
the Central Symmetry.
There is a corresponding inverse exercice.
It is for somebody standing at a fixe centre and then to place
everybody around him in such manner that the whole form a circle
around it center. It wild be done in varying the distance or the
circle radius.
All these exercises will be an amazing and educative ones if there
is an equipment of photos and some computer that allow to verify
rapidly the circularity of these field events.
Conclusion
This is an example of what is deductive consequances that can be
done from a true circle postulate. Without the Central symmetry,
there is blankness of reason. From a such postulate unbounded
consequences can define what is the wealthy circular property in
the universe space.
From a such perfect central symmetry without no Form because
there was only space Direction, we can deduce that there was
necesssarily a matter process for space Distance definition. Space
as Direction and Distance is the logic of the universe as form
constructions. Therefore, there was necessarily one Beginning
from the pure central symmetry for the Distance Transformation
Generation.
Therefore, there is logically in the universe the Beginning of
Construction Event rationally defined in Dakhiometry as the
apprearance from the Circle property a relationship corresponding
to the Square form.
From there any form, included the Circle, the universe uniqueness
realities can be constructed as precise structures of forms in
space.
May be, from the Plato's compass was intituted the famous circle
definition. From there circle formula are defined by a radius. It is only a
creation from "idea".
Because practically and more basically, a circle should be accessed by its
diameter. Remember that manufacturing of tubes use a diameter to
specified any tube. And the first possible measurment of circular form is
the diameter. Also, astronomy uses diameter of heavenly bodies.
Plato tell that the world is based on the differents geometrical figures
included the circle. But this universe space description shows that he
don't know really what is the circular realm because a such theory is only
the Linear universe.
Definition of a circle
A circle is a structure of space locations in Circular Succession. Nothing
else out of this circular succession belong to a circle property.
Consequences
a) - According to these usual errors about a compass, one can draw many
geometrical figures with a compass ignoring that one is using only a
straight edge structure and the circle are there only a conventional figure
of "equal distance from a center point".
b) - In practice a square can't be constructed using only with the
property of a circle as circular points in succession. Because this circular
structure is in fact the Direction Structure or more wellknonw tell as
Angular Structure.
c) - From a circle there is uniquely one possible transformation: the
squaring a circle. This latter is the even from there Linear realm can be
revealed. It is the event of linear Direction that allows to measure the
Angle in space. Angle can be defined only when straight line exists in
conscience.
For example, to draw a square with circle, we need first to define at least
a 90° angle or its multiple. We do that because, we KNOW yet what is a
direction lines. But with only the real circular structure we can't know
what is a straight line.
Note
that universal laws means that strictly, nothing is outside of any
universal law. It is why there is no Nothingness. Nothing is in the
Nothingness according to the Nothingness should define No
Universal Law because anything is necessary properties from
universal laws.
The belief is that Linear tool can reproduce the Curvilinear realm.
Difference between Zeno's Clasical Exhaustion (Mz) and the Enhance
Archimedean one (MA), is that Zeno propose to do exhaustion with the
preceding half-step while the Archimedean axiom states that it is done
with a little more than a half-step. But both are unsuccessful courses.
2) - The way from points A and B can be precisely decomposed and fully
"exhausted" with the space structure. Point (A) is precisely equivalent to
point (B). But only using the Circular property and not the linear
archimedean exhaustion step.
Why is there a such result?
It is because in the space structure, there is the immortal presence of the
Space Constant!
From the biginning of human concept on space there is only linear mode
of undestanding space. Even if Plato tel that Geometric problems should
be resolved with compass-and-straight-edge, he was telling only linear
space meaning. The classical impossibility of resolving the squaring a
circle and the angle trisection are example of ignorance of the universe
space or the matter space. It is because the angle is a circle property.
The origin of space ignorance is to be unconscious that the circle is not a
form amongst so many other linear forms. So, it was a Plato's errors to
tell that tne universe is an assembly of triangle, squares and polygones
as layers in spherical sky.
True knowledge of the universe space should rest on the foundation that
the circle is not a form but a logic-of-form. The transcendent logic which
we have access to, is the Space Constant of Form Transformation exposed
in this present text.
1) - circumference definition
The circumference is composed of the number of discrete elemental
matters disposed successively in a same central symmetry, two by two.
Thus, a circumference is the "area" of a minimal circle crown.
2) - The summation of all the crown "areas" of a circle is then the total
"area" of the circle disk.
Reciprocal
- uniqueness + of + the + reciprocal + proof (USA)
1) - Polygon
2) - Curve
Measurement resulting :
At the ultimate boundary of a polygon and the circle perimeter, we
have a seemingly elemental line. However, the problem is : WHERE
these two lines should be surimposed as equality of form ?
In brief:
A polygone is a multi-direction line organisation. One name its
perimeter as a polyline construction.
A curve is a whole ONE direction Recurrent structure that allow to
define precisely an absolute point center.
Actually, it is done with a very low resolution apparatus that can tell
anything...
- pi + human (Estonia)
- supernovas (Peru)
- having-a-concept-of-self (HongKong
- transcendent + pi (USA)
about (Philippines)
- properties+of+the+matter (Chile)
- "itegral" (Brazil)
The above summation formula (aa1) is the proof of how a circle "area" is
composed of.
we get:
D2/4 = [Sommation de zéro à D de ni(dx)]
Let a square of side equal to D. It can be seen that the circle aera is:
That is to tell
When (dx) is lesser than 0.2 then an integral and a differential equation
can be of an approximation without to much error. This is valid for
electronic signal processing using sampling analogic ones. However, a
differential and integral calculus should not be considered as precise
calculations. They are only mechanical methods to get the nearest value.
Conclusion,
It is the meaning of the summation equation (aa1).
The above summation of circumferences in a circle allows to know the
circle "area". It also give the proof of the circle "area" formula.
Dakhiometry theorem
1) - The circular disk (C) "area" with a radius (R), is equal the total "area"
of all the cocentric circumferences with radius situated between zero and
(R).
Dakhiometry theorem
1) - The "area" of circular disk (C) of radius (R) is equal the "area" of the
square of side (2R), time the Space Constant denoted as (Pi/4).
2) - The "area" of the square of side (2R) is equal to the "area" of the
circular disk (C) of radius (R), time the Space Constant inverted (4/Pi).
whith with Numbers that are only conventional talking and writing
languages.
Because the real intuitive mathematical notion that any alive needs to get
conscience and knowledge is the pure space concept of himself and of his
space envirronement. However, because the deep knowledge of space is
too hard to get and also because drawing geometric figures was not so
easy when lacking of drawing materials. For example, modern computer
gives a great capacity to us to get more and more complex space figures.
This is forbiden for the first human mathematicians. The Anciants can't
but choose a way of expressing mathematics concepts with conventional
languages. Thus, Numbers become the most used mathematic elements.
From there Pythagoras invented the universe as Numbers. Next,
Arithmetic, Algebraic and Analytic Geometry that was conscepts of space
transformed into number langages, are means of doing mathematics. The
basic difference between the first and the second method is the
impossibility of the first to get precision in matter laws knowledge.
Conventional talking and writing languages are separated with the pure
elements of space by a deep lack of the first to get precision of matter
laws. Precision is not an ideal of ideology. But precision is the property of
space construction in the universe that is needed for human to go further
into complexe constructions.
some physical law is difficult to know, even if it is very simple, this is due
to some particular state of human thought.
On can tell that the mystery of the squaring a circle is due from a so long
time where mathematicians had give up the effort of understanding the
Space as matter. This gived rise the impossibilities of resolving some
problems in Geometry. Geometry believes that human can get knowledge
by conventional language and thus manipulates only abstract thought.
However abstract thought are mostly imaginary and matter space
knowledge can not be reached by theses mathematicians. Therefore for
no longer, mathematics becames science of conventional language
formalisms. These are the cases for Numbers, Arithmetics, Algebra and
all what follow as their developments. Then, from simple natural laws,
mathematics go on into the super formalism complication.
Here, the Space Constant is a KEY for a vast means for going through the
space understanding. This Constant is not yet well received by the
current world science and techniques becaue most of scientists may see
there as a new receipts or tricks. Most part of you are interested in the
old Pi of how it is irrational or how it is composed of decimals.
Let a Cube (C) with the side equal to the cercle (C) diameters. We can
operate as the obove procedure to proove the surface of a circle with the
square one. Here we need to do in two times the Summatios of elemental
lengths to get the cube volume. And from these results, a new form of
the Space Constant give us the Sphere volume. It is done as follows :
Vol(S)<=>(Constant / 6)*Vol(C)
Vol(C)<=>(6 / Constante)*Vol(S)
In brief
According to the current notation about the old anciant's
notation on Pi we can state the following theorem.
Dakhiometry theorem
The volume of a sphere:
The volume of the sphere (S) is equal to the Cube (C) of side equal to the
sphere diameter, is given as:
Proof on solid volumes and surfaces have more basic procedure not given
Thus the Squaring a circle is the most simple while it is the most
fundamental KEY for space knowledge.
Actually, at same volume, circular perimeter and surface aure less than
the corresponding ones of a square or a cube.
There are many practical situations where one need to put a square form
in a cylinder one. It concerns mechanical constructions as well as for
foodstuff use. Then, the cyclinder circonference time the space Constant
factor give directly the maximum square perimeter. From there one gets
the maximum side of the square that can be adjust through this cylinder.
For a cylinder in a sphere, let us consider its section through its principal
axis of symmetry. We know that the volume (V) of a cyclinder is : V =
constant.[D.h] with D=diameter and h=(axis-length).
Consequences :
Relationship between circle and its inscribed square.
- the + inventer + of + pie + formula (USA)
Square (T) :
Pt = 4.d ; and St = d2
circle :
(P) and (S)
Square (c) :
Pc ; and Sc
P = (Pi/4). Pt = Pi . d
Pc = (4/pi) . P = 2.sqr(2) . d
Thus,
P/Pc = Pi / (2 . sqr(2))
And,
P = (Pi /(2 . sqr(2)) . Pc
Pc = ((2 . sqr(2)) /Pi) . P
St = d2
And,
S = (Pi/4) . d 2
Sc = (4/Pi) . S = (1/2) . d2
Thus,
S/Sc = Pi / 2
Et,
S = Sc . (Pi/2)
Sc = S . (2/Pi)
Conclusion:
It is important to generate these formula according to the method of
starting from a square as reference to aobtain the Space Constant. This
use allows to keep alive the method of thinking that consists of starting
from a base, then unfolding successive reasons for developping
construction. Remind that the circle and the square are directely linked
together in succession of series. So, from a base of a square as
reference, one can control the measurement of these series of figures.
In more, the use of the Space Constant from a reference, allows to easily
memorize the different formula without being dependent to their
formalism that will soon be a great confusion for scholastic teaching.
(Singapore)
Spatial proof
of the Recurrence as space property
It is why one can use an International System of units and all other
different conventional measuring unit system.
En brief:
As it is shown in the following, a ONE unit can start with any
dimension and then one can use it to make a space exhaustion
succession. As matter is fundamentally decrete, the Recuurence is a
space exhaustion succession that does never mett any hole in
space. Therefore, there is no Irrational, no Infinity. The Recurence
is a precise scanning of the universe fullness.
- pi ++ pattern (Autralia)
Not only the motion aspect of the recurrence, this latter is the
fundamental principe that allows construction of spatial forms.
Thus, it is a just notion when telling the following recurrence
relationship as "patterns". Because, understanding recurrence
allows to know how there a different forms in plane and 3D figures.
Therefore, the surfaces and volumes of solids can be WHOLLY
deduced from this recurrence base. In Dakhiometry, all the
elemental forms are precisely known from deduction, starting from
one spatial base.
- pi + rational (Switzerland)
- rational + pi (Nepal)
The unique matter in the universe is both space and motion. Matter is
dicrete thus, it is necessarry a finite quantity. On what foundation does
the motion come from ? It is not sufficient to tell that motion is energy. It
is only a tautology. The root of motion origin is in the discretness of
matter, without it there can be the universe construction. Thus we there
the key of opening the door for movement. It is the RECURRENCE in
matter.
Dakhiometry.
Recurrence definition :
discretness, one after the other without no rupture or no fault. And when
matter is in recurrence property it appears as movement phenomenon.
Nous are going there to make the proof of the matter space recurrence.
The contnuity of space is in the logic concept of successive spatial figures
that are independent et distintive between them. And the continuity is
expressed as the perfect relationships that link together these
independent figures. Thus, if a series of figures is formed successively in
the continuity of a law than we have proved the space Recurrence.
Notations:
Then, the perimeters and the "area"s of each series elements can be
deduced as follows :
P1 = k . Pt
Pc1 = Pt/(sqr(2))
S1 = k . St
Sc1 = St/2
P2 = k2 . Pt
Pc2 = Pt/(sqr(2))2
S2 = k2 . St
Sc2 = St/(22)
P3 = k3 . Pt
Pc3 = Pt/(sqr(2))3
S3 = k3 . St
Sc3 = St/(23)
Thus according to that the recurrence reproduces the same property, here
is the Space Constant, a general formula is as follows when the
successive ordinal take the one of the natural series number N :
Pn = kn . Pt
Pcn = Pt/(sqr(2))n
Sn = kn . St
Scn = St/(2n)
Reciprocal :
From these equations the reciprocal precurrence recurrence process can
be written. Thus, from a square inscribed in a circle of ordinal (n) it can
be established a same system in any ordinal order (t). The recurrence
step is well ordered. It is written as follows :
Pt = Pn / (kn)
Pct = Pcn . (sqr(2)n
S
n
t = St / (k )
Sct = Scn . (2n)
Results:
The Recurrence process in direct et reciprocal
modes in space, is fully established. In this example between a space (t)
an (n) the recurrence defines the absolute Fullness of matter. The
exhaustion between (t) an (n) is quite rational and precisely defined in
any direction of the recurrence process. Thus we have proved there that
in space the movement and its energy aspect, is completly and precisely
defined, in any direction, without missing any part as fault or hole. The
space is the a Fullness of rational matter.
Conclusion :
The figure representing this spatial series is the unique direct
fondamental proof of the Space Recurrence. And the Recurence concerns
the reproducibility of the spatial relationships between circles and
squares according to the tha Spatial constant (k). This proof is done in
two dimensions space. It is the basic law expression. It can be also
extended in the three dimensions when it concerns the solids to express
their volume and surfaces. This is then the proof of the total Fullness of
matter in the universe. This cancel the different old hypothesis of hole,
Nothingness, Infinity and Irrationnality tricks.
The different formula written here are only verification, and is given only
because one use to understand the recurrence with the natural number
series. However, the spatial construction is only the real valid proof.
converge this spatial series toward some Zero that is only language
convention. And seeking a zero in matter is a direct contradiction of a
discrete matter principle.
The circle is before the universe and is the permanent structure of matter.
Every thing and We, are made with the wealthy circular structure. Thus,
each of us is not only the stars dust but more fundamentally, we are also
before the universe. Therefore, the universe and each of us, are never
created. circle is not god becaause it is a basic structure amongst other
ones and what rests on circular structure also can't be god. Inversely, all
this Whole itself can't be god because god need not to create himself
when the universe and human are created. As matter is necessary
permanent and this Whole is god then, a god creation is only a feed-back
action in the Whole. His creation is necessary a closed loop sytem where
the Output human acts on the Input god. A such god can't never be a
Creator because he is at the same time created by his creation. In any
way that we do reasonning on god man sticks like glue to him. Therefore,
Creator and Creation are only ONE person. This ONE is not the famous
UNIT but this one god is only te man hiden under a mask.
It is an exact real fact that we can draw the start of evolution of the
universe. Drawing and explaining this event is a possibility inscribed in
our thought.
Exactly, at the starting of the Beginning, we all, in the past and in the
futur, are being witness to this event. There was really no form because
at this moment, there was not yet any form. However this event is in the
permanence of the matter properties. So we can draw and understand
the Beginning because, it belongs to our thought logic. It is really such.
In next time, I will expose the proof of the equality of the circle and the
transformed square surface. There is only simple elemantal logics. The
logic of the Recurrence that allows the starting of only 1, 2 and 3 then,
the proof is done ! It is simple, a supreme simplicity of the Beginning
where life was born. However, this simple proof can be understood only
with new concepts. What are exposed here in this text, contribute to this
understanding.
You are telling the Tao, it is a just physical image of the starting universe.
Because the Anciants had draw the symbole of the starting visible motion
in the universe when they established the visible rotation of the universe
Signification:
The Total "area" (S) is equal to the "area" of an ultimate elemental matter
time the total length of all the circumferences.
This is the definition of a rectangle with length equaled to the total lenght
of circumferences and with the width equaled to the ultimate length of
elemental matter !
Isn't it a clear definition of discrete matter "area", even if it concerns a
circular structure ?
A such process is the more exact the more (dx) value is near the utimate
elemental value.
Calculus of curvilinear aeras and volumes are usually done form graphic
of linear Analytical Geometry. These are only acceptable as usual
approximation. However using it as Mathematics exactness is a harmful
systematic error. The most use of such approximation method as for
example in the Fourrier analysis, should produce many unkown artifacts
and bad interpretations. It is because the Trigonometric sine function is
only a specific particular mechanical motion of a round solid piece. While
in the nature, there is no "wave sine trajectory". There is ONLY, parabolic
wave motion. The so many Fourrier function type used in analysis is
really an artificial bad systematic measurement method.
In fact, the fundamental Space Angle is really a severe science ignorance.
- integration calculus formulae for multiple function (New Zealand)
Actuallay. Because:
a) - Calculus are done only in linear algorithms.
b) - These algorithms are only forms of the famous exhaustion method.
It is useful but give only approximative results.
On left of the figure, bad integral calculus process for curvilinear function
versus linear variable. On right, correct integral calculus when applied
only to linear function.
These calculus methods are quite erroneous and give only rough
approximations. They are empirical methods and do not allows
mathematicians to verify their results. Thus, their applications are
generalized in any sciences.
Now that the squaring a circle is yet found we can show how these
curbilinear calculus are only eronneous from there one believes that a use
of infinitesimal object allows to go anywhere in forms of space. The
following calculation of the circle "area" using curvilinear function versue
linear variable, gives a quite high biasing result. And practical methods
that use also such algorithm gives same errors. It prove that measuring
the surface "area" to determine the Pi value of 3.1416 is a fact of
empirical practise.
- summation + pi (Canada)
Consequently
The error of Pi=3.14 is 0.1%. Thus:
(3.14)(0.1) = 0.314
Therefore
(10)(3.14) ± 0.314 = 9.9 and 10.1
And may considered as (10.Pi)
The result is that 31.4 is multiple 10 of 3.14.
That is to say "to put the cart before the horse". Instead of trying to
figure out from the circle the factor Pi as one does it when drawing milk
from an udder.
Nobody can't touch them. It is why tortoises are famous for their long life
time...
value + of + pi (USA)
- pi cake (Egypt)
S = Sum from 0 to CD of
[Square root2 of (BD.DE) ].dx
The total circle surface of (C) is then S = 2S
------------
Let : (dx)= 0.0001;
S=0;
BD=0;
Do :
BD=BD+dx;
S = S + 2 * [(BD).(CD-BD)*(dx)];
Loop from "Do" until BD = CD;
------------
Obtaining the circle surface S the Pi value is then :
Pi=S/[CD2/4]= 3.1415...
The more (dx) is tiny the more is the Pi value the one given in standard
Pi used in calculator. However, with (dx) = 0.001 the precision is
sufficient for usual uses.
Example, when the diameter CD=100, is divided into little parts d(x) for
surface summation, one get the experimental Pi values as :
(dx)=1; Pi= 3.1383...
(dx)=0.05; Pi= 3.141555...
(dx)=0.02; Pi= 3.141583...
(dx)=0.01; Pi= 3.141589...
(dx)=0.001; Pi= 3.141592549...
(dx)=0.0001; Pi= 3.141592651...
Note
With (dx) varying from (dx)=1 one get Pi=3.3836
But at higher (dx) the integral is no more valid.
One can see that empirical Pi values that was given in the whole anciant
word can be sitiated there.
I'm sory to tell it, because in science the space means Nothingness
then, Mathematics ignore the space properties as composed by
linear and circular mode, the two independent space characteristics.
So, Descartes and any mathematician ignore what is "geometric"
construction. The Descartes isoperimeter method is using linear
convergence only for convergence towards any given defined value.
It is not a rational means to get into the Circular Realm, the
unknown point of circle from where a true circle radius can be
defined
Note
This above Dakhiometry's exercise of calculus for the approximative
Pi, is not a paraphrase of Archimedes' Pi. But it is not also a
geometric construction because it uses algebraic notations to define
and simulate the approximative Archimedes' Pi determination.
Consequence on numeration
- a + linearly + dependent + set + can + be + extended + and + it +
will + stay + lineary + dependent (South Africa)
Trigonometric errors
- what + are + the + rules + in + significant + figures + for +
foundamental + operation (VietNam)
Note
For the Dakhiometry, the problem of angle measurement is completly
defined.
There is nothing to do with the quite empirical manners of Analytical and
Algebraic trciks to give the illusion of the current high science exactness.
There is no way to get into the exact science until one stays in the
ignorance of what is the fondamental universe Space.
The proof is to ask yourself, how on can construct the figure of any given
angle value without using the blindness of the Number illusion.
This is to tell that it is a big error to belive that the linearity of Number
can't never give a sight in the space angle realm.
It is clear that the squaring-a-circle has no meaning for the current
official science.
Because the how to have an access of any spatial angle is necessarily the
way of understanding the squaring a circle. For example, from
millenaries, the squaring-a-circle is for Archimedes the understanding of
how to square-a-square! It is also for the Analytic Geometry inventor, the
Trigonometry is only tricks of a recipe book, the way to overlap linear
realm on to the unknown of the circular one.
In Dakhiometry the space directions and the measurement of angle
between directions, consists of how to figure out the relationship between
these two fundamental characteristic of a real concrete and absolute
Space.
The so-called precision of trigonometry, scince the numercal capacity of
calculators is only an illusion. And the decimal founded for the
Archimedes' Pi is the capacity of modern science to catch at shadows.
Without using such tangible knowledge of the matter space, there will be
severely no exact science.
Important note
There is no sinusoidal curve in the nature of universal laws, as is
learned in the Current Trigonometry.
Even with the spatial circle construction of the Dakhiometry, it is completly
proved by construction that the angular function of a circle is a real
parabolic curve. Therefore, the Trigonometry is not only an approximative
That is to say
Azimuthal angle measurements is known when angle between zero and
90 degrees are known, according to circle symmetry. However, how to
known what is a given angle aside the multiple ones of 30 degrees.
The generation of curvature into the straigth line and inversely, are not
simply jokes. Here above is shown how Archimede is in error because he
believed that polygon straigth lines can be superimposed on a curvature.
Here in the following how can one figures out the distorsion when one
tries to use Trigonometry for describing circular lines. It is the case of the
usual wellknown
y=R.sin(wt) linear function.
- pastulation (Philippines)
Trigonometry starts to build ratios giving the sine and the cosine from a
point on the circle. It is always a true result. However, when apply in
Trigonometric determination, one can't but use a linear relation as the
y=R.sin(wt). The linearity comme from the time variable. It is there the
Basic Trigonometric construction error.
On the figure it appears in a fine red line the derivative of the (S) curve.
C'est facile à les dire mais, le chemin pour y semer la clarté est si long
et si diifficile, non pas en elle-même mais, parce que les
mathématiciens ne connaissent que ce qu'ils avaient appris et ce qu'ils
enseignent, toujours dans la rigidité morte du linéaire.
Voici une idée de comment générer les angles, si l'on ne sait qu'utiliser
le vieil langage des Nombres:
Mais cette formule simple, permet de calculer à la fois, tous les arc-sinus
et arc-cosinus. Comme simplicité de la Dakhiométrie, il n'y a pas
mieux!!!
Right!
However, it is only because angular quantities are directly the
circle property. Contrary to the Trigonometry that introduce errors
in the angle definition when it is done according to the linear
Analytic Geometry axis.
These are only formalism resemblances. One can see it only when
they are expressed in pure spatial language.
If a such trigonometry can be built with the Thales rules, all of the
world mathematicians of the anciant times probably had done yet
a such system.
There is really a more basic reason that allowss to get a so fertile
view point.
This following formulas are the basic ones for angle determination.
They are very fertile and easy in applications. When calculation
with spatial elements is applied with them then, the precise angle
properties can be unfolded by deduction in extended wealthy
space structure.
It is a basic remark.
Now that the angles are determined by a point (A) on a segment
(BD) then the answer will be more precise. A triangle is only a
brief of a circle circumference. The total triangle angles is only
situated between 0-180 degrees because the circle angles are
completly determined by the point (A) in (BD) can situated only
between (BA=0) to (BA=BD). It can varies back between (BA=BD
to (BA=0). This is a form of angle variation stricly between
(90.2=180) degrees
Because the linear is born from the circular then, the basic reason
is from a fixed point, two intersecting lines can be never more
than being perpendicular and make an angle no more greater than
(90.2=180) degrees. We should note that the perpendicular line is
then the property of circle angle. A Triangle can't have no other
angle property than the circle one.
The Dakhiometry had proved and spatialy constructed all the functions
to determined completly the basic angles between 0 and 90°. These
proofs rest on the basic properties of the absolute space the ones
unknown in Mathematics.
BA + AD = BD
Actually, only and strictly, circle properties can resolve the space
Direction and then, consequently, the linear realm.
You are informed that the Dakhiometry method of dtermining the space
Direction - usually denoted in the classical Trigonometry as Angles -.
They are done more simply, perfectly precise and with exactness.
Any angles are defined by the above ratio (BA + AD = BD). there is no
need of sine and cosine definition and no more their inverse as Arc-sin
for example, to expressed them in degrees or in another unit.
For example,
An angle is given as the ratio conventionally named as follows:
... etc
Also, from a given angle (a) in degrees for example, it can be simply
constructed its form as this above "cos" ratio. That is to tel, with any
ratio (BA/BD), one can figure out an angle without calculating the
Arcsin or Arccos that are only approxiations. And given any angle, one
can determine the ratio (BA/BD) corresponding to this angle.
Any angle value are rationally spatial constructed. and the usual
How can Astronomy and Cosmology can be built on such hugue errors?
This means that this system can be use to define any direction in
the whole Absolute Space of the universe Globe.
This system may use the modern numeric technology that can
drive for a maximal pixel definition. This device can be refered to
any fixed defined direction.
Obviously each "E.T." may have his own reference of direction. This
is only to tell that eachone on Earth for example may have his own
conventional language. One needs only interpreter. Because it is
not yet possible to define the ansolute Latitude and Longitude of
the universe.
Thus for the Earth one need only to define any given fixe direction
as the one for fixed reference.
The use of Lazer Rays allows to associate the lazer Ray for
practical construction ... as spatial Lines of the Dakhiometry
Spatial Language construction.
This figure shows how one can construct the equality of aeras between two
different forms. Here is concerning to construct a square aera (S) from the
one of an equilateral triangle (ABCD).
Spatial construction is simple to get exactly the result.
Concerning aeras, the Lam-Ca theorem is the top.
One have to archive the Old pytagorean theorem in his big Museum and
should rapidly be in acquaintance with this great usefulness Lam-Ca. Any
miracle and more are from it.
fundamental:
Thus if one choose angle on the basis of 0-90° then a half circle
determine 90° of directions.
And a Whole circle is defining all the 90+90 = 180°
On can verify that all the Circle Possible Angles can be defined by all
the inscribed Triangle angles WITHOUT REDUNDANCY.
In the true rational definition of Circle for the Dakhiometry, the angle
definition rests on the Half-circle as capability for defining 0-90° angle
extend. The high exactness of spatial construction allows to use not
only the anciant's 0-90°. But the spatial aLanguage allows the used of
0-90n °.
And obviously also the angle definition with the total angles as equal to
Two-Pi, as the Two-Dakhiometry-Pi by spatial construction. Where for
example, the angle extend may be half-circle extend as [angle extend
= From 0 to 312019372702489... as wholy integers].
This will be used for defining more precisely the astronomic heavenly
bodies repartition over the wide universe Globe Space. The definition
of the univers globe angle (altitude and azimut) by successive ... one
to one definition on 312019372702489 extend. This will be accessed
for futur human's science technology. The present theorical basis is a
fact.
Consequence
From any point it can be
drawn perpendicualrs to three
sides of a triangle as a circle
center can do it to its three
chords forming an inscribed
triangle.
Important
Example.
On this above figure it can be done the mirror (xx') symetry of the ABC
triangle. The result is the same when doing a 90° rotation particular to
each separatly sides AB, AC and BC.
It proves that from any point (O), it can be drawn pependiculars to the
sides of a triangle because the total angle of a circle is 180°.
II) - The rational tools for doing the Four Operation on the Angle, by
Construction as the addition, the Substarction , the Multiplication and
the Division.
This means that the Dakhiometry had defined the rational and precise
definition and the measuring for Any Angle of a whole Circle.
And also the true Basic definition of any angle by construction.
Errors are due to that the Mathematics sinus and cosinus functions was
usually determined baddly according to Linear reference.
While for measuring angles, the Dakhiometry had defined the optimal
true Circular reference corresponding to the angle as characteristic
strictly from the circle property. The true varaiation of the sinus and
cosinus are exactly done according to parabolic trajectories.
It is noted that the usual mathematics parabolic curves (y=a.x2) is
seen only from an orthognal reference. It produce for mathematicians
the belief that a parabol is a linear function.
It is there also an error.
Because, it should be seen that the parabol is directly from the
Without the Circle knowledge the base of the Spatial Language there is
no possible rational science else than the usual Mathematics
presuppositions by axiomatic, postulates, hypothesis and also
divination.
The angles may be defined between (for example 0 and 90°) as for the
circle quadran (A). And for the whole circle, it suffices only to get the
complement (A1) and the supplement (A3) and (A4) from this first
quadran (A).
The usual angle values of 0-90° was only from the Anciants. This gives
the cumbersome decimal values that have no meaning according to
that the Trigonometry is only an approximative "do it as you like". It is
quite a bad joke to apply these angle vallues for astronomic faraway
observations particularly with the Pi = 3.14. The fact is that according
to these Trigonometry techniques of angle measurement the precison
is no more better than 2%. A 2% of light celerity is rather a big deal...
In summary
For the Dakhiometry method,
any true operation by construction on the Angle can be done as
one does it for the current Linear figures.
Note:
In the following and due to the angle complementary, a given,
or
Examples:
is written as:
INFORMATION:
A complet and precise Angle determination
in Dakhiometry
You are informed that Space direction or Angle is still
unkown in Mathematics even if it was created there
some apporximation with the empirical Trigonometry.
The Dakhiometry had achieved a complete precise and
rational scientific system of defining angle, according
to his full knowledge on the space circular realm.
Angle is rationally determined according to precise
space constructions.
It shows that the Trigonometry has a certainty no
better than 1e-6. It is not included there the classical
Archimdedes' Pi with its uncertainty at 1/10 of unit (
3.1??? ). This proof of errors is determined by spacial
constructions which is characteristics of absolute
precisions.
It is not easy to simply expose it here because a such
system need deeper basic space knowledge that
mathematicians has no access. It consists to know how
to calculate space structures with the space language
then, to know how to manipulate the circle and any
conics figures. We have to consider that Mathematics
Geometry and Analytic Geometry is really simplistic
when compare to the Dakhiometry science
possibilities.
Important difference:
Note
Such possibilities are one of the most important
consequences deduced from the Dakhiometry
squaring a circle solution.
1) ------------- Trigonometry:
;
Dakhiometry:
;
With the Pi value 3.1416... of computer:
;
2) ------------ Trigonometry:
;
Dakhiometry:
;
With the Pi value 3.1416... of computer:
3) ------------ Trigonometry:
;
Dakhiometry:
;
With the Pi value 3.1416... of computer:
;
Warning
Any of CAD sofware used in the whole word contains
the Archimedean Pi (as 3.1415...).
As circle are highly used in practical CAD designs,
paid attention that even if math processors used with
long floatting digit precision there are many great
errors during calculations for figure constructions. It
is because most of figure in modern technology
concerns circular forms.
Measurement Conclusion:
Measurements on figure lines are more precise with a
minimum use of digital number calculations. Therefore
the result with the Dakhiometry method is better than
the uncertainty of the Trogonometry plus the numerous
step for calculation using particularly the Euclidean
division.
Note
What are shown here are only first sight. The Dakhiometry circular angle
definitions are complete. Angle can be manipulate for precise
transformations as it can be done in linear mode.
Important
Sailors use to search their displacement direction according to stars with
the sextant navigation instrument. This latter rests on a three axis
coordinates principle. This is a method irrelevent in three dimensions
extraterrestrial space because there is no terrestrial horizontal as given
plane reference.
For the Dakhiometry method of spatial angle determination, it needs no
more the sextant principle. It suffices to determine the direction target
relatively to any fixe given reference direction. For example this latter is
determined by a faraway star that can give a sufficient good direction of
reference. It is considered there that the parallax of a faraway star is
equivalent to a fixed direction. Then the linear straight way toward the
target is known.
All the trigonometric formulas can be easily verifyed with these above
equalities.
For example, the (cos 2a) can be extended in its general form as
(cos n.a)
It is impossible in Trigonometry to express a such relationship because of
its formalism complication. But in Dakhiometry, a simple spatial structure
can define the multiplication of an angle (a) construction. Its allows to
construct a polygone in a circle without worying with the successive
reporting of a same arc or chord.
Note also that in Dakhiométrie all the four basic operations can be done on
the sine and cosine, for example:
(cos a)/(cos b)
is easily done. It suffice to read the result from the space structure. The
continuity of the sine and cosine should be done with these relationships
and not with the angular velocity as (w.t).
Yes.
Here, space direction rests in steady deep basic sources of space
properties. It is more precisely, clearly and completly defined in spatial
language. Angles are there defined not with linear Numbers but by
spatial elements of discrete space. That is, angular directions are
defined as space points seen from a given fixed point.
The Dakhiometry can spatially prove that the circular angle can be
represented in using relationships between three colinear line
segments as:
BA + AD = BD
In this case Any angle (a), for example between 0-90°, can be define
by a length (BM). This latter is used to figure out the particular angle
(a) by the spatial language forms. It is written as the following:
their local rest point and also of system of these elements that is
orbiting around their rest point according to the potential versus
kinetic energy law. One should consider that heavenly bodies orbiting
not in perfect circular orbits are also vibration whith ultra low
frequency. For the earth for example, the cycle is one year duration.
But we can consider that these duration is no more the vibration scale
and be considered as movement one. Heavenly bodies remains in
conservation energy because they are independnent object by matter
condensation process constructions. Thus, the Newton Universal
Gravitation is a contradiction where a Big Bang and a Big Crunch
principles are contradictory to the Energy Conservation in the Whole
universe. An absolute space has no expanding nor crunching
mechanism and the Relativity in space is only anthropomorphic
empirism of historic bad tale.
When was know rationally what are the circular properties then one
can define what is really an angle. Because angle is strictly the
property of a circle. An angle can be precisely defined when one can
defined a precise two-points on a circle. When a language composed
with spatial elements is known and used un science than Excact
Science can be built because any form in space is necessary derived
from the Circle knowledge. The Circle property is a Gate for the
knowledge of the whole universe.
This figure show that all this above function are quadratic ones. The sine or
cosine curve are denoted there by (1) and the red curve denoted by (2) is
the Trigonometric wellknown [{sin(wt)=y].
We can see that there are errors from this latter compared with the
Dakhiometry ones that are parabolic functions.
Note that this above formulas are only simple transcriptions of the
Dakhiometry's spatial structure towards simplistic Algebra numerical
formalisms.
But in their spatial structures it can be read directly the sine or cosine of
an angle and also they figure out directly the given angle. That is to tell, in
a spatial structure an angle is not directly read only as its sine but also as
its inverse denoted by the Arc-sine.
Therfore,
a) - A parabola is not generally defined by a focus and an axe director.
b) - A parabola should be defined by concentric circles as Focus and by
a fixed direction.
It is true.
Absolutely, we have to take any angle as the unit one. Then we have to
anlyze this problem as follows:
In the Natural Interger series, what can be divided by TWO?
Therfore, from an unit angle, only EVEN quantity can have a bisector. It
is only a true concept over the universe Fact.
This the rational logic applyed to the dicrete matter: only even
quantity of elemental matter can be exactly divided by two.
The old Mathematical Geometry are not space science but is only
empirical approach to some incomplete superficial formalism.
While the universe fundamental basic first reality denoted as space is
fully mastered by the Dakhiometry science. Space is quite known and
practised through its linear and curvilinear aspect.
Practising space is a clear conscience on Measurement. It is based on:
a) - A just conscience on Quantity and how to determine it.
b) - Measurements are concerned on the two space aspects. It is how
to determine: Linear and Curvilinear Quantities.
intersections. Note
* On a straight line, points determine distances.
* While on a circle, points is directions -or angle- determination.
In conclusion
In addition to the Linear World, the Dakhiometry masterises also the
Science of Angle in the true universe Space.
Statement.
Note
One may remember that the squaring a circle is a reversible
transformation. Therefore, in space, curve and straight line can be linked.
Finally, there is really a key that allow entering the circular form. the
Squaring a circle is the ONE and also the UNIQUE ONE to open the
circular structure for spatial knowledge. It is not exaggerated to tell that
the Sqaring a circle is the key opening to the universe space knowledge.
Comments:
Therefore,
On can conclude that the above error value of 1.34% on the surface
calculations or measurements, are a general characteristic of the
imprecise Algebra method.
Is Pi an irrational number ?
- "WHER" + THE + MATHEMATICAL + INVENTIONS (Vietnam)
Actually. A not so obvious one... - which one is height and which one is
length in rectangle (Canada)
A real anxious problem. Why a North is the North and a South is the
South, a 1 is 5V or an On and a 0 is a oV or an Off?
- a circle and its tangent which show the properties at the point of
tangency. (Carolina, USA)
If the little square is the transform of the circle [C]. Then the Pi value is
directly given as follows:
Pi = 4..(AB2/AD2)
or :
Pi = 4.(x2/y2)
Pi = 4/(AD2/AB2)
In brief:
These equation are quite rational. And they prove that
the following formalisme is also RATIONAL. And
consequently, Square Root of Two is necessary rational :
Now, there are many who complain or enjoy that the numeral Pi seems
not finish to calculate. But don't enjoy with it, I am sory to remind them
that they don't know how to divide. And also, they ignore that they fon't
know it. To enjoy more note that most of numerals division can't never
finish to an exact value.
Remind that the division use the Euclide's division algorithm. This process
is generally not an exact dividion. Mathematics don't know another
method to divide. The reason is of great funfamental one and even for a
mathematician of genius, Pythagoras is a magnificient example, we must
know that : numeral is not mathematic but only obey to human language
rules !
The problem is now to replace the whole calculation system with a rational one that allows to define
the exactness of space. This needs more than some remedy recipes.
Does squaring the circle done when the perimeter or the surfaces are
equal between them ?
Inportant
What must be said clearly about the squaring a circle.
The squaring a circle can not be done in the equality of the perimeter
between the circle and the square !
Exactly,
The squaring a circle is done under the following unique condition:
are equal
Inversely,
Transformation of a square to a circle can be done initially with the
Surface OR the perimeter of the square, to find the Surface of the
transformed circle. Reason of these conditions rests on the unique
correspondence between a numeral and its square and inversely. Example
: let [x] the length of the square Side OR the circle Diameter. Then :
4.x = x2
and thus :
4=x
This result is unique and immutable. And the squaring a circle with its
reciprocal, are done always with this factor [4] that is a part of the
constant denoted Pi.
To remember it :
TWO values of the one corresponding to ONLY ONR SURFACE of the other.
- "perimetr" (Gorgia)
This is a main point to understand why there is Pi. From that Pi appears
as a space constant and not as a particular effect of a circular form.
Then, any form of plane figure can has their "area" written as under the
above relationship (00f).
For the square :
with k=1; kx = y; it give: y.y = y 2
For a rectangular surface :
ky.(y)
For circle surface:
ky.(y)
In conclusion :
Pi is usually known as attached to circular figure but Pi is not a property
of circles. Now, we have to understand Pi as only a constant factor use for
homothetic space transformation.
How + to + figure + Pi
Fig-4-4
From a circle {C} inscribed in a square of side
length AD, one can obtain a litle circle {C1}
charactérizing this spatial system. Placing
{C1} at the center {O}, a segment [AB}
tangent to it can determine the side {AB} of a
square. This latter is the squaring of the circle
Results :
1) - The cyan rectangular surface is equal to {4 . Pi}.
2) - Examining the formula {4 . Pi}, one can see that it represents also
both the surface and the perimeter P of the circle {C}, when its radius is
R = 2. According that :
Inversely
From a length of 4.Pi, one can obtain any rectangle having this surface
value. Using the Lam-Ca theorem one gets a square representing this
rectangular surface. Then, the reciprocal of the squaring a circle can give
the circle {C}. This circle {C} has necessary the perimeter {4.Pi}.
The old pi values are empirical or mystical given value. This last is
a given quantity to aplay blindly. There is no means to know why
and how they come from some origins. While the new pi value 3.12
is an exact value. The exactness of it is founded on the spatial
structure from there it was calculate. It is spatial reasons that
come from a direct proof reciprocal one. Exactness that come from
its universal presence in any spatial structure transformation. This
value that can be figure out from spatial figures and not from
arbitrary discouse rules. This new spatial Constant is fully exact
and universal. It remains now to found how to precisely numerise
it for usual human language.
- pi + is + rational (Lithuania)
You are quite right, immutable right. Because there is more deeper
reasons that there is no irrational things in space. More latter I will
expose the complete means of how to calculate with spatial tools.
In space a solution is a precise point in the fullness of a structure
that composes the absolute discrete universe space. This allows
the real accurate and precise life construction. There is no need to
converge something toward somme unknown thing as one do it in
the anciant times.
(C/A)circle = (4/AD)
(C/A)circle = (C/A)square
Ce qui veut dire que la longueur donnant la Constante Pi est aussi:
Pi length = (AB').(C/A)square = 3.12019373...
Note :
From (Dint-ref), will be normalized this system with the Space Constant to
get the unit of measurement.
Consequently
Note
Practical exemple
Suppose that you are trying and verifying the Square a circle
construction. You like to have from a remote friend some opinion about
it. This latter will do it and on his computer, realizes this geometric
construction according to his usual manner. That is probably with a
figure quite different in its dimensions than your's one. Thus, he can
rapidly verify the different relationships between the geometric
elements. Finally to give a brief result, he can do a numerical measure
on his computer and then tels you his solution. His numerical result will
be understood by you because he is applying the normalized space
Constant as you do it yourself.
- proportionality + L1 + L2 + S1 + S2
Constant = 4(S1/S2) = Pi
The squaring a circle was revealed since four years, on this Earth. By the
Squaribg a circle, the New World is thus created and displaying.
Particularly, in full view of all mathematicians.
And what is the result of a such event? Because this is a Unique events:
the real world is creating, the reality, The One.
Results:
a) - Nothing is never notice by official institution, nobody is refering to my
works. It would be a sacrilege to open an institutional mouth and tell: the
squaring a circle is a fact of human life, the human evolution...
b) - What are most of you worrying? Its is something like "Archimedes' Pi",
the longest Pi, the irrational Pi. Thus most of people is still living in the
deep darkness of the Pass. They are dreaming all along their life and can't
see what is the Here and Now.
c) - Probably, most are telling that the squaring is not so important. May
be, this true proof doesn't be a true because it isn't the work of their own
Official National Idolized Great Genius.
These gestures are used here as "word" signs for language expressions.
The "OK" seems to me as telling that something is Okey or "Fine". Fine as
the thickness of a hair between the thumb and the index.
However, may be, the Zero as India mathematic symbol (0) is refered as a
circle, representing cyclic process figure. It is the case for any numeric
base, that allows cyclic counting notations for great numbers.
So your informations on hand and arm gesture languages are very
interesting for good relationships between human mutual understanding.
The importance of center of gravity definition, is the first basic datum need
during interaction. However, when center of gravity is a real measurement
impotence, it gives rise some difficult problems.
Why the Squaring a circle is a Creation of the New World? A new world is a
one that should replace the old false world. Thus here are what the False
and what the New are.
Numbers are only words. They can't be materials for knowledge. Thus the
thinking needs authentic concepts badly denoted as numbers. Then, the
thought needs to name the quantity in physic reality. These names of
object realities are not word but space construction. Therefore, naming a
space length or distance, is actually the how to construct precisely this
quantity. What is the real concept usually denoted as a number, is in fact
how the human thought can situated precisely this object quantity, in
constructing it. Thus a length or a direction being able to be named in our
thought, is in fact the know how to construct according to space language.
This are in daily practice needed for each of us, the know how to move in
gestures or in displacing.
In summary
1) - The false of the current sciences.
Human genius are buried in huge errors as they are living according to
empirical manipulations. Sciences do not know what is a Length and quite
ignore what is a Direction. Thus, they do not know how to precisely name a
quantity, the actuel space quantity. More deeply, he cant have some precise
things about circular space structure. The Trigonometry is an approxiamte
trick as well as the Archimedes' polygonal convergence for measuring the
circle. None of the mathematicians can have a just idea of the Angle
Trisection and the millenary unresolved three basic mathematic problems
on space.
The Trigonometry is an approxiamte trick for calculation as for the whole
Algebraic methods. Because the ANGLE quantity is a quite erroneous
concept of the Direction in space. You don't trust on my remark? So, I ask
you to only draw any precise angle. Only draw, any angle given between
the whole azimut direction. And also, draw any given length of a segment.
Please, if you dont succeed to do that with the compass and straigth edge,
then you have to conclude about of the great ignorance of the official
sciences and with what you are educated during generations!
2) - What about the New World introduced by the squaring a circle? The
squaring a circle is the basic knowledge starting at the universe
construction begining. Thus:
a)- ANY SPACE LENGTH CAN BE NAMED. That is to say, any space length
can be constructed. Quite precisely and fundamentally in the elemental
discretness precision.
b)- With the squaring a circle established. The Direction is also Quite
precisely determinated in space, as it does for the straigth length. Thus the
space Direction is not defined as in Trigonometry by the Angle. Therefore,
with the reality of the squaring a circle, ANY DIRECTION IN SPACE CAN BE
NAMED.
Would you draw precisely a given "angle", divided an another one, would
you like to inscribe (n) gones given in a circle? You can do it now, EASILY.
Easily,.. however, remind that its a millenary enigma for all the human
existing mathematician genius!
This two basic human mind conquests, is resumed in the event of the
publication on november 2002 of MY OWN SQUARING THE circle WORK.
The quite disdained by most of the whole so Official Today Mathematician
Genius.
So, the latter conclusion is for me: the real 3th millenary event of the
official human ignorance, the huge Big One. I take off my hat to them, the
big champions.
Note that any value {q.Pi} is also valid. Therefore, any fraction of Pi is a
measure of a straight segment and a perimeter of circle, provide that any
number is a square surface and any other derived forms as a rectangle of
the figure-4-4. We can state it as follows :
Fig-4-5
After construction of the length equate to
Pi, as done above in figure-4-4, we can see
in this figure-4-5, the construction of any
perimeter of the universe circles. Each
perimeter is equal to the surface of a
corresponding rectangle.
In summary:
The Lam-Ca theorem alows to define in the circle-square spatial
structure a quantity that can be in four forms : the surface of the
circle {C}, the surface of a square of side length {AB}, the surface of
the cyan rectangle and also the Perimeter of the circle {C}.
Actually.
Any segment on a straight line can be a diameter for a circle. Then,
any Number measuring this diameter can be represente a
constructible number. More any square root of this diamater can be
also constructed. This means that any irrational number can be
constructed on this line "of Numbers". Therefore, there is no irrational
Number, provide that all of them are constructible.
This is for particular constructions with the circle property. But there is
in Dakhiometry, a specific spatial structure where constructions of
CONTIGUOUS defined points proving thet there is no irrational hole
between adjacent and successive segment lengths. This valid for any
numeral base even for binary and hexadecimal ones. This shows that
every numeric base are only conventional things for man-Numering-
counting. The true Quantities are the one constructible an definable by
spatial elements.
Solution
We get finally the circle of perimeter equal to 3. It is the one the
diameter of which is equal to one side of this rectangle.
Consequence
Any quantity of circle perimeter can be spatially constructed. More
basically tell, there in no Irrational Number.
Important
The Dakhiometry can do such construction from any given quantity
beginning from Zero to unlimited one. You may verify that
Mathematicians can do a such complete resolution because there is no
fundamental bases in Mathematics.
Rivers of Ethiopia are all looking on to the inside of Africa continent. Because of the
Ethiopia high reliefs particularly along the Eritrea ones that close any river to flow towards
the Red Sea. So the Ethiopia characteristic is mainly to look on to Africa continent and less
toward the Eastern.
Fig-4-5-1
Here are the basic characteristic of
the spatial structure of a square.
This can be shown by the two
circles C1 and C2. The surface of
C2 is two times the C1 one.
The squaring of the circle [C] is
thus precisely determined by these
two characteristic circles [C1] and
[C2]. Therefore the squaring of
circle [C] is given by the side [AB]
of the resulting square. And the
precise length [AB']is the length of
Pi value.
Actually, AB is tangent to two circles [C1] and [C2]. The reason is that
the point {A], is the center of a hmothecy of factot h = (Square Root
of 2) of the latter two circles.
The point [B] allows thus a precise and unequivocal intersection point
in the square, for the squaring the circle [C].
- anthropomorphism + in + Life + of + Pi
How to figure out the square root of (2) and the square root of (Pi)
lengths, with the compass and stratght edge
The length
SQUARE ROOT of TWO is the
FIRST UNIVERSAL CONSTANT
of rational construction in the matter space
- square + root + of + pi
Note that square root of 2 shown here is not due to the diagonal of a
square. It belong to a whole space structure of any ith-root quite
In fact, any quantity from zero to the universe greatest one, can be
writtenunder square-root form as successive discrete continuity. This
shows that Numbers are strictly conventional formalism of words
language. Numbers characteristics is that they don't obey and be
expressed in true successive continuity.
Hereafter are figured out lengths of Square root of 2 and square root
of Pi.
These lengths are rational provide that they are results of compas and
straight edge constructions. These constructions are here given
according to the circle Theorem, given latter in this text.
Fig-4-5-2
The figure 4-4 is resume here to show how the square root of 2 and
the square root of Pi are obtained. These legnth values belong to the
number Q series.
The diameter of [C} is equal to 4 and the one of [C'} is its half that is
equal to 2. You may mesure and verify that AE and AF are these
values :
This is because :
AO = 2 x Square Root of (2)
That is : AB = 2 x Square Root of (Pi)
formalism to kids
biginners in math?
This next spatial calculation is done rapidly in the most short way if
we are currently in use with the new spatial method of four basic
operations as addition, substraction, multiplication and division. It is
because the spatial language is an universal reality. It is not built
according to so many particular human languages done with artificial
conventions.
Thus, it is expected that in the futur, kids can rapidly learn, mastering
and inventing spatial solution of most complicated technical
construction problems. Until now it is not really the natural
phenomena that are complicated. What is complicated is only the
human empirical sciences that rest on their languages coagualted in
formalism of algebraic numerical calculations due to their ignorance on
fundamental facts of space.
Knowledge of space reality is in itself the action of humnan living.
Length of Pi is calculated
latter in this text as R4=
(square root of Pi).
Then R4 intersecting with
the tangent OM by OT is
the square root of Pi.
This next figure shows
also how to verify that
OT2 = 2.(OT') = OP = Pi
- Square + Root + of +
Pie + Formula (India)
Surely.
For example considering my personal case, I was during thirty
years a laboratory assistant where I was only a simple dumb
machine. Aside this situation, never any of my own work
exposed in this web site was accepted by any scientific journal
for publication. If there was no internet possibilities, the present
squaring a circle remains still unknown and may be, for ever it
remains as the glorious possibility of Mathematic Impossibility!
But still from year 2000, sciences are not yet intersted to
replace the present precise Space Constant and was still
prefering the old empirical erroneous Archimedes' Pi. In brief,
this current world is really living a nigthmare and is not so
optimistic.
Note that the four operations for calculation using spatial elements
need at first to chooe any conventional unit of length that allows then
to fefine length quantities according to this figure unit.
This is not an artificial convention but rest on the basic logic of
successive quantitities of the ultimate elemental matter. In fact what
is known as Induction principle for theory numbers is done on the
base of the unit ONE (the 1 number). But mathematicians ignore that
this ONE (the 1) is only a necessary logic representing the ultimate
element of quantity. From there the Integer Number series can't never
rest on the base of a ZERO. Zero is not a Quantity and therefore,
should not be a Number.
According to this Number theory starting necessarily from the (1) the
Arithmetics and the Algebraic need not to initialize a defined unit to go
on calculation. Because Arithmetics and Algebraic are only in one
particular case of Conventional Number beginning from the Number 1.
Spatial calculation of space structure needs at first to define a unit of
length. It is because space has two main characteristics:
1) - Directions
2) - Distances.
In Direction one can access to the whole universe direction space. But
in Distance the whole universe space should be define by homothetic
considerations. This last space characteristic gives rise to the need of
chosing measurement unit because homothetic realm is composed of
different length scales.
- C1 symbol (Philippines)
(N1;N) = (N;N2)
They are two unit arcs of circle (C1). This means that the two formed
angles are equal:
(N1;Ô;N) = (N;Ô;N2)
This is a reason to state that a tangent (AN) to a circle (C1), has the
radius (AN) a symmetric axis.
Conclusion
Tangent Theorem:
Any tangent to a circle intersect the coresponding unique circle
radius always at 90 degrees
and not from basic reason. In fact the Morley theorem should be start
from the true source of trisector construction that should be done from
any triangle property. Its final result should be the trisector
construction and not the inverse that is the little equilateral triangle.
So, this Morley triangle should be really starting from the defined to
reveal the defined equilateral triangle. There is no random. This latter
is only the virtual world to designate what we ignore in the universe.
For example, Mathematics has invented the Irrational Numbers
because Mathematique ignore what is the Quantity uniqueness. Only
language worlds is creating as Numbers to simulate the missing
Quantity concept. This is the fact of irrational belief replacing the
rational basic quantity.
When one know how to construct a triangle by constructing all its
trisectors then one can construct any n-trisector of a triangle. Note
that these constructions are additive operation and not dividing one.
From there the internal little equilateral triangle appears only as a
particular case of the trisector construction.
In conclusion
There is more much high interesting thing to learn than to repeat any
of the empirical Mathematics trick product... Because without the
space language, Mathematics can't do nothing else than to turn around
a vicious closed loop.
It is shown above that aera of circle C2 is two times the C2 one. This
the base of this proof. We will consider here the square of these two
circle radius.
This is the proof that tangent AN intersects at point M the two circles
C2 and C.
The how to define the unit in space construction allows the mastering
of spatial calculation, the perfectly precise and exact method for
rational space manipulation. The Da-khi-Hoc is actually mastering a
such method.
The solution is given when we see that all circles are homothetic
forms. Thus, circles C1 and C2 are necessarrily homothetic forms.
The circle is the reminiscence of the matter permanence from that the
unicerse is endless constructed.
The above little circle C2 shows that the square root of 2 is inherent to
the circle. That is to say, the square root of 2 is a Permanent universe
quantity. Because matter is discrete, the square root of 2 is
necessarily a precise quantity.
The square structure allows to construct (C1) and (C2) in space to get square root of 2 length.
Therefore, this latter is a rationnal and universal quantity. While a diagonal of a unit square is a
dummy object because one cannot know what is a length=1. This latter is not a unique value.
A unit length must be defined as only a convention.
OO1/OO2 = sqr(2)
Therefore, along a universe line we can get any ratio of lengths equal
to the square root of 2. On this next figure some of these ratios are
shown as:
(OA/Oa)=(OB/Ob)=(OC/Oc)=sqr(2)
This is the proof that an universe line can be generated from the
square root of 2. These lengths are exhaustively from the ultimate
discrete matter to the universe length.
(OA/Oa)=(OB/Ob)=(OC/Oc)=sqr(2)
We can state that Oa, Ob and Oc as the unit for measurement. Thus,
we have:
(OA/unit Oa)=sqr(2)
(OB/unit Ob)=sqr(2)
(OC/unit Oc)=sqr(2)
Consequently
Because OA, OB and OC can be any quantity from the elemental one
to the whole universe matter quantity, we can see that the lengths OA,
OB and OC can be as:
OA = sqr(2)
OB = sqr(2)
OC = sqr(2)
c2 = a2 + a2 (5-2-1).
c2 = 2.a2 (5-2-2).
From this result, one established that the square root of 2 is irrational
because the diagonal and a side are uncommensurable together. We
see herafter that a such formalism is an great ERROR of reasonning
Figure 4-5-3
a2 = c . (c/2)
et :
a2/c = (c/2)
Finally :
c = 2 . (c/2) = c
The fact that one draws this circle diameter (c) and then,
following the square (a2), proves that the circle diameter as
square diagonal is directly commensurable with the square
edge! This is due to the relationship structure property of the
absolute space.
Therefore, the Pythagore's and Socrate's proof as reported by
Plato's description and also to the modern Numbers Theory. all
these irrationality demonstrations are false because the absolute
space is ignored.
- mathmatic (Iraq)
- mathematic (Nigeria)
- mathematic (Turkey)
- "mathmitic" (USA)
- mathematic (Mongolia)
- mathematic (Hungary)
- mathematic (Poland)
- mathematic (Albania)
- mathematic (Azerbaidjan)
- mathematic (Latvia)
- mathematic (Iceland)
- mathematic (Thailand)
- mathematic (Caucasus)
- mathematic (Indonesia)
- mathematic (Georgia)
- mathematic (Romania)
- MATHEMATIC (Mexico)
- mathematic (China)
- Mathematic (Malaysia)
- mathematic (Cambodia)
- mathematic (Vietnam))
- mathematic (Myanmar)
- mathematic (Indonesia)
- mathematic (Cambodia)
- mathematic (Namibia)
- mathematic (Ukraine)
- mathematic (Korea)
- mathematic (Myanmar)
- mathematic (Vietnam)
- "mathamatic" (Israel)
- "eureuka"
Let (d) a diagonale and (c) the side of any square. A little more
complicate and because one know only the empirical Pythagoras
theorem, it was used to establish the diagonal and side relationship
as:
d2=2.c2
From there it was concluded that there is Irrational Number.
This result was only systematic error or only ideological consideration.
Because the relationship {d ; c} is simply a rational ratio as:
Theorem:
In any square, a diagonal is directly and
precisely proportional to its side and is
spatialy constructible.
It can be find for any square the same length constant as:
...... :-)
In brief, "square of a square root " is really an opening into the deep
space knowledge, the fundamental one.
Let (n) and (x) two integers. Consider that (n) is the greatest of the
series and (x) is any of the integer that may constitutes an unity as
reference. We know that n is unlimited but a countable number. The
natural number numver series can thus written in such manner that
"square of a square root " is the most important understanding of the
Recurrence. In the following how to make series of squares numbers
from the natural numbers one.
We have starting:
nx
But
nx = (n-x)x = nx-x2
Then,
nx = (n-x)x-x2 = nx-2x2
In continuation
nx = nx-3x2
nx = nx-4x2
nx = nx - n(nx2)
Conclusion:
The above formula shows the Unbounded Concept. Unbounded
starts from the beginning of a series and contues unlimited.
While the infinity concept is a bad and contradictory conventional
process that defines a precise particular object: the "end". The
contradiction is that one can't define an "end" that is not defined
because it can never be reached. So the infinity concept is a
tautology.
And the numerals that are least than 1 are also rational, because
in space language there are precise constructions to build any
numeral between Zero and One as well as any one in the
unlimited series N.
figure (Canada)
We can use this value to compute the side of the square that has
the same surface of the circle. Thus, if {D} is the diameter of the
circle and {L} the side length of this square, we have :
Fig-5
This figure-5 resumes the practical uses of the circles and square
equalities. On can obtain any circle or square, from an initial squaring
a circle. This needs only the use of the uniqueness of angular
characteristic of the equality figure.
If I understand that the "area" of lune is the one of a circle, then here is
the construction of
Theorem :
ANY "area" of circle CAN BE EQUALIZED TO ANY "area" of ANY
DEFINABLE FORM.
"area".
On can obtaine more different forms if they are direct related to the
square or the rectangle one.
Inversely
Triangles and rectangle can be associated in their forms. Then, a square
can alxways be representative of these "area"s. Therefore, this square
can always be transformed in circle of equal "area". This is the reciprocal
of these constructions.
By extending :
Corollary Theorem :
Aby crescent-of-lune "area" can be equalized to any "area" of
defineble form.
Conclusion
The possibility of quaring a circle and its reciprocal allows to increase
greatly the richness of spatial knowledge.
Actually.
A crescent can be formed only in such manner. Without such condition,
one will observe only a thing look like a cricle.
An intersting question.
we have:
a) - A line and a curve are two quite different mode of space placement.
Fondamentally, space has only these two modes of successive placements
even if any location can be occupied by a point of the two succession
modes.
b) Therefore, a plane can intersect a sphere. While two planes belonging
to the realm of linear succession, can never form a curve of successive
points.
Consequence
If ever an intersection of two space objects is a curve then, two planes
cannot be concluded as forming this intersection.
Thus one can tell that this two planes is not yet intersecting. Rather, they
are parallel planes. An another mysterious talk that seems odd but is a
real logic:
Two parallel planes are two planes intersecting along a curve...
Algebra irrationality.
The Archimedes' Property is the root of the Algebra irrationality.
diagonal (Canada)
Let (c) and (d) the side and the diagonal of a square.
Then the aera of the square of side (c) is the half of the the one with a side (d).
This seems to be obvious. But its obviousness is only due to their current definitions.
Thus, we have to oint out the basic property that allows how it is true that thes two
figures have 4 right angles.
a) - First let us refer to the basic figure of circle. Any figure of three points has
necessarry their three points on a circle.
b) - In a circle any maximum angle is of 180 coventional degrees. Thus the
maximum angle that the sum of the angle formed by the tree sides of a triangle is
180 degrees.
b) - A square and a rectangle has two diagonals that divided them into two triangles.
These two triangles are central symmetric relative to the circle center, where their
diagonals intersect.
c) - Now, we can note that the square and the rectangle have also two perpendicular
axis of symmetry different from their diagonals. Thus, if the two rectangular
triangles in both figures have each a 90 degree angles then, according to their
perpendicular axis, the other angles of these triangles are necessarry right.
Therfore, it is true that the square and the rectangle have four right angles because
both have a symmetry center plus two rectngular axis of symmetry. These later
reference axis form a total of 360 degrees or more explained, these axis divide each
two figures into 4 right angles at each vertex of the square and the rectangle.
There are the fondamental space properties. Space has two aspects: the Distance
and the Direction.
The homothetie is the property of Distance et don't affect the Direction and inversely
the rotation dont affect the distance of a system.
It is why the rotation and the linear displacement are quite mutual independant.
However, both obey to a same principe: the Recurrence principe of motion. that
produce movement.
The Lamca theorem resolves simply all the cases of this problem.
- "pastulates" (Philippines)
For example:
There is much things to tell about the matter space properties. Here are
only given statements on the space properties according to the
Dakhiometry:
Dakhiometry Laws:
Matter properties: The discret Space.
It was so difficult to have some access to the circular form. Because the
difference between point succession between circle and straight line
was unknown. The current quite linear Trigonometry is an example of
such misunderstanding.
The basic difference is that a next point successive to any point is not
the same for a circular and for a straight line. The space properties is
then well characterized only by these two aspects.
The absolute space has two properties: the Linear and the Circular
aspect. This can be understood and be adjusted into Two different
physical properties:
1) - The Linear DISATNCE one in Space.
2) - Plus the DIRECTION one as the second characteristic of the
Space Circular property.
Therefore,
A) - A line-Distance should be defined wholy as formed by THE
preceeding-succeeding-Location Refered all along one defined
Direction as the structure of a Set of successive discrete-matters.
This is the Space Linear property.
B) - While:
Consequently,
Without such basic elemental conscience, only possible in the
universe Absolute Space, the presupposed Continuity in the universe
is simply a Science of Nothingness produced from Illusion.
Consequently:
The [ D = Pi.R ]
We can see now clearly that from there are originated the
Contradictions. Because:
At first,
these contradictions necessary give rise to the Mathematics
IMPOSSIBILITY of Squaring the Circle.
And secondary,
The Irrationallity that are strictly from the artificial
pythagorean Number System.
It is to noted that:
These two points are common to the Line and the Circle when they
are tangent.
non-successive points
Consequently
- nature abhores a vacuum (UK)
points with the curve. This is not exact and even it is false because a
line is only defined by two points (It is known from Euclide). But we
admit it temporally.
An another basic example of linear function that gives false result is the
Archimedes' exhaustion with polygons to tempt describing the circular
line. Fundamentally, it is because a polygone side is never a point or if
it has two points, it doesn't be successively on a same circle. It is why
only the Space Constant of the squaring a circle can give a direct and
whole morphing of the circle-square. The Space Constant is not a
function nor linear neither curvilinear.
There are too much false ideas to throw out and too much modes of
though to change!
- a sort if triangle that has equel sides equel angles (UK Birmingham)
The only basic fundamental concept of any thing is that the whole
universe is a whole of universal laws of matter.
For any human the element of conscience is then necessarily the
element of matter. Actions in the universe are then action of systems of
matter.
Therefore, the basic of thinking and body action are done and described
with Quantities of matter. It is why human science is concerning the
How and the Why matter systems are going in actions.
Consequently, understanding life action in the world need to know
matter Quantity. This the most basic element of knowledge.
In human life societies need communication. From there are invented
languages to talk about anything happening in life. Particularly there is
science society where scientifics must invente some specific language
concerning the object matter. As matter is at first Quantities, sciences
need to name each Quantity of any object. From there was created
language worlds as Numbers that may be used to designate object of
matter.
However, most of scientifics confuse the world Number with the reality
of object matter. That is to tell we use to eat the world Bread and are
missing the real bread from the baker. In brief, we are using to catch at
shadows, because rules of Number language, is never univeral laws of
matter Quantity.
wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Dantes-Inferno.jpg)
All of the pyramid sections are located at the a same mass center which
is the pyramid mass center one.
In corollary
Any of pyramid with inclined axis but with a same same altitude have
their mass center G located at a fixe plane passing through the mass
center of the right pyramide.
The cone center of gravity is the same of the pyramide one where it is
inscribed.
Definition
In brief
Remind that The succession process logic concern the spatial point
layout. Even in discrete and FINITE universe matter, A MATERIAL POINT
IS ALWAYS A SAME SUCCESSIVE POINT. A SUCESSIVE LOCATION IS A
PERMANENT PROPERTY OF SPACE. Therefore, the succession or
recurrence is not a means to drawn infinite parallel lines for a meeting
point at the Infinity! Because the succession is done with a same point
in a same direction. We have just given definition of the Recurrence or
the Induction.
Not only right angle but all of these pyramids or cones of any form of
base with equal aeras and equal altitudes, have equal volumes.
An another trick
- constant of cone bei einer secant (Germany)
The high elevated teepee summit may be also an efficient solution for
rain water flowing on animal fur. We may note that no animal has a
plane back surface. And if man has a nearly plane back, it is because
he has no buffalo fur. :-)
Actually.
Squaring a nice teepee is morphing it into a square buffaloskin
pyramide.
Knowing that :
H 2 = A 2+ B 2
Or simply:
It is because:
aera of equilateral triangle traingle is only the x ratio of each of
the interested side squared.
Let (h) the height of any right or inclined pyramid with an elliptic
base. Let this ellipse inscribed in a rectangle with an aera (S).
Then the pyramid volume (Vol) is written simply as follows:
Vol(pyra-ellips) = (Pi/12).(S).h
- dertermine the angle between the ABC and edges of the pyramid by
replecing planes projections (ricona.net.ua, Ukraine)
Note:
sqr(.) means Square Root of (.)
If one would transform the equilateral form of the base from any given
Surface form (S), then the Transform equation is as follows:
S = L2.(sqr(3)/4)
L = 2.sqr(S)/(sqr(sqr(3))
Or under usual mathematic form written as:
On this next figure is shown how to determine the gravity center (G) of the
equilateral pyramid.
The distance (PG) of center G from any equilateral pyramid summit (P) is as follows:
The Algebraic forms are used here to be more easy readable by all. However, these
examples of equilateral triangle transformations can be done precisely, proved and
calculated very simply by pure spatial constructions in Dakhiometry.
There are wonderfull changing color precious stones. This is the proof that light
energy are only particular phenomena of a matter medium. Here, this latter is the
particular precious stone structure.
Important NOTE
For those who are hard conservative mind believing to the fineness of
Irrationnality in things, to the Continuum generating infinities, to the
Impossibility of problem resolutions, to the separation of algebraic from
the geometric resolution methods, they may read this following note:
I can tell you that no one mathematician can produce such rational
reasonning. Simply because the Succession is too difficult to be in
conciousness for human. The proof is more understood when you ask
any man to explain what is Movement or simply what is Time. Man is
confused between these two concepts because he has no access to the
understanding about Succession principle of matter.
A Dakhiometric definition
About the Quantity Theory
The WHY
Because Zero is Not a Number. It is why it takes a so long time before
that it was invented in India. Therefore, if one can tell 1, 2, 3,...
objects, the Zero object is always a conjecture never resolved. Zero is
neither the Void nor the Abcense of object. The Void is the Void
therefore, there is not any object in the Void. In the contrary, the
Absence is ALWAYS the non-presence of some GIVEN object. Thus,
there is not Zero object in the Absence.
Consequently
The HOW
How a Zero sumbol is so important to the Number Theory?
The main reason is that the Number comme from no more than the man
empiricism of accessing different objects in the world. The first
conscience of object is then to COUNT them. Counting is an analogical
It explain also why tempting to explain the Zero as the Void or as the
infinitly minus is impossible. Because Zero is not a Quantity but a
coventional Word.
Finally,
The Zero can't represent the Void or the Absence of thing. But it really
represent the END of a CYCLE.
From such result, what is Counting and what material is needed for
Counting?
a) - In Fact, the (1, 2, 3, ...) is not really useful to count Great Quantity
more than an economical numeral base choosen. Fo example the binary
base is composed of only (0 and 1).
b) - Mainly, what we need for counting is ONLY THE NECESSARY ZERO
symbol. Clearly, this means that counting Quntity need only the
technique of registrering the Cycles of counting iterations, that
compose any quantity to measure.
c) - For example, what is important for you?
Therfore, the Zero is not a number, but a Word to indicate the cycles
of Quantity counting cycles.
From there, one can see that the Zero is not belonging to the Number
series (1, 2, 3, ...). Strange isn't?
Thus, we know from there that animals know what is counting the
quantities however, they have not an universal animal language to
invent talking between them, about great quantities with some Zero
language convention.
The Zero is then no more than sonely from the human language word.
In conclusion
The Numbers are only empirical and conventioanl language means
of man used for empirical counting the necessary matter
Quantity. Therfore, Numbers is a false idea of science for matter
Quantity.
The series (Zero, 1, 2, 3,...) are only man discourses very useful
until now but it is not true science tools for Quantity concepts.
Note
1) - The Zero is very useful because it is a language articulation
being abble to designate a large amount of real Quantities, when
one has only the method of Counting to access Quantities.
In brief:
The Numbers series can be considered a conventional Length
representing (1 meter) - or any other unit - . Then the Integer
series is only the usual reference to designate some quantity of
Length. The Number problem is how to associate a series of (1
meter) to measure any of the universe length. Generaly, it is a
measurement enough sufficient for any practical measurement of
Length quantity. But even if one use the micro, the pico or less
scale, we are always staying in conventional man's discourses.
However, one know that there are many problem on these system
precision. For example in Mathematics one tempts to define the
measurement precision by some known Congruence method. A
more precision was tempted to elaborate the Real Numbers using
the trick and recipe according to the Dedekind-Cut. However, this
manner of doing-it-as-you-like, had put the Mathamatics against
the wall to draw there the limits of the Mathematics universe.
Sciences need only to know that they are concerned by the Matter
On this next figure some matter objects are represented in red color.
Particular objects are defined by their unity. For example, the
uniqueness of a stone unity is represented here by rounds disposed
successively on a line. However, this is only an usual way to represent
ordering things on figure as schoolboys in close order. Because the
Succession principle is not dependent of form. This a most important
basic characteristic of Succession. The understanding of it allows us
How a man is going to tell to his friends or how his memory reminds to
him, how much stones he counted?
Step (1)
Along human history this is no so easy even if he has intutively the
quantity concept. He ends to define signs or symbols to correspond
precisely to some quantity. For example, this man can invent six
symbols for his word language to define quantities from 1 to six
objects. This is shown on the figure at step (1). These are symbols or
words that can be traduced by talking.
Step (2)
However with six symbols the corresponding quantities is quite enough
for desingnating a great quantity of stones. This a great hard problem
for him to know the quantity of stones he can meet. Persevering in
seeking a better method to describe much more quantities. Finally
allong time, an another man find intuitively that succession of matter
object can be valid with another placement structure than the linear
one. Thus, a low number of things can be place on a wheel and can be
continually count even if they are in cyclic repeeted. The continuity of
counting can be precisely defined, if one notes the end or the beginning
of the cycle.
Then with six words one can added to it an another one for defining the
Cyclic Succession. Therefore, the man added to his 6 defined words a
seventh one the meaning of that is to define a use-again the six
preceding known words for continuation of counting. The result is that
this man has invented seven human language symbols to a possibility
of designating most of quantities he hope it!
Step (3)
Latter the man tries to complete his technique of counting for defining
any quantity with a wheel structure. Using these limited seven words,
how to write and to memorize any quantity?
From example of the succeeding six first words, he finally finds that he
can also produce the succession of the succession of the latter six
words that happens at each circular cycle.
From this advanced results, he denotes the seventh symbol with a
round for denoting that a cycle is finishing and a new one can begin.
This symbol is the represented as a round added to the One symbol.
As succession can be embeddes successiveley he concludes that it
suffices to add a round at each new cycle. Therefore, the writing of a
language for any quantities is then completed as is shown at step (3)
on the figure.
Finally, the writing language for defining quantity is to overlap
succession of unity in succession of cyclic counting.
This is the final method of counting for knowing quantity. The most
used is the decimal based counting that can fit practically for any
quantity of matter. We must tell that this technique is only a language
one that have nothing to do with the actual matter space structure.
On conclusion
Only with the Dakhiometry Principe of Succession, we can explain the
reason of the human technique of getting quantities using counting the
successive process. This is the Why of the human language Numbers.
The How is that man succeedes to construct a such technique because
THE CHARACTERISTIC OF THE SUCCESSION PRINCIPE IS TO CONCERN
ONLY MATTER POINTS AND THUS IS FORMLESS. Consequently, human
language can be invented simply for practically designating any
quantity according to the Succession property to be formless and thus
being endless embedded the one into the another.
Corollary
As Succession allows matter to appear in movement.
According to that succession can be endless embedded together, the
movement phenomenon can be anylized as follows:
1) - Uniform
2) - Uniform accelerated
3) - Non-uniform accelerated
In brief
The usual concept of Succession in Numbers Theory is not an Infinite
Line as one uses to represent. The basic Succession concept is only a
logic principle of the discrete matter as the fullness of the universe.
That is to tell, element of matter is the matter discretness but between
two elements, the fullness of matter imply that there is no hole or
nothingness. The Succession concept is representative of this principle.
Consequently, the usual Number series of Numbers Theory are only the
"do it as you can" of the human language convention.
The Sun is displacing in the sky. Sun is the life center. Thus, it is
important to deduce that any life event can be measured according to a
displacement of the Sun in sky. It is why the sundials are not some
unimportant gadgets of the anciant time. A sundial is a length
measurement device used to measure the Sun displacement one.
The Sun is rotating thus a sundial can be a circular rotating device. One
can regularly place six objects on a wheel uniformly rotating.
The Sun displacement in sky can be refered as displacement, according
to some fixed star position. With a such apparatus we can reproduce
some length of these displacements denoting events in a day life.
in continuation, he can also count the next six cycles of cycles. And so
on... his count technique can be efficient for unlimited count
measurements!
Remark:
At first, this device shows what is the real meaning of the HUMAN
WORD named ZERO which is used as a sign to denote successive cycles
and not erroneously tell as representing the Nothingness of the Devil or
any God or Ghost or any Infinity or any Black Hole or Big Crunch and
Big Bang.
In second, we tell here that these are displacement length
measurements and not the ones of the Sun's or the wheels rotation
speed. Because we don't need any dummy factor as used with the usual
TIME belief. You can note that this diagram is like the one of a watch.
Pedagogy
Therefore, you should teach to kinders that a watch give a
displacement length in proportion to the Sun one. Thus, you cease
to tell harmfull stupid dummy thing as "a watch gives the TIME".
Doing so, you make kinders growing with the just idea that
accessing to space need to know length Quantity. On the
astronomical view point, the exact idea is that a watch measure
the EARTH'S GROUND DISPLACEMENT RELATIVELY TO THE SUN
CENTER.
The Dakhiometry can clearly give the WHY of the count property for
human. Thus from there, no more ignorance can be tell about the so
mysterious Numbers in the universe. Youngers must be teached with a
such truth about matter laws.
COROLLARY:
because that any point is the successive of an another one,
EACH POINT IS THUS THE PRECEEDING ONE OF AN ANOTHER POINT.
Parenthesis...
There is a common World though. A one particularly coming from
Polynesian legends and recently known with Gauguin. This though
is deep embeded in any alive as human. Because he is
constructed with matter laws, any human wear in background
many questions about the Being and on his Existence. It is the
famous questionning: "Who are we? Where do we come from?
Where are we going?".
You may note there the Fundamental basic Principe of Succession.
It is why in the first counting device, The fact of using only succession
of counting dont allow to find no end of counting. This process is like
the one of catching at shadows! The succession process is only
concerning ONE point property: each point is only the successive or the
preceeding one.
Because with a reference point on the circle, he can precisely tell what
is the quantity of a total Sun successive displacement lengths.
It is why he can now determine event in a day, any successive days,
successive seasons. Because his wheel can successively represent the
Sun successive displacements. The successive years are possible in
reference to the aged human...
The introduction of (Io), is in fact the Zero invention which was the
wheel symbol designating the circular cycle. Therefore, the Zero is the
basic success of the human counting process allowing unlimited
quantity definition.
In conclusion:
One can tell that ignorance of the WHY and the HOW of counting is not
allowed scince since now. It is the Most Fundamental principle without
that no science is possible if there is no precise Quantity Concept.
Example:
The series :
1, 2, 3, ...etc
is representation by human language words, the SUCCESSION FACT
While:
0-1
are words for representing the ends of length of 1 unit of length.
0-2
are words for representing the ends of 2 units of length.
0-3
are words for representing the ends of 3 units of length.
...etc
Consequence:
The matter point property of Succesion allows the Movement
phenomenon. Thus the object movements are only successive of
displacement lengths or the succession of successive lengths of
displacement.
Consequently, human can since now, throw out the TIME. This latter is
the human thougth poison. It graws the dogma devouts and spread out
the plage to all the human on Earth.
Important Notes
You may found this Reasons of Counting more explained in details, in
the same chapter written in French on this same website. If you are
interested about it, please make it readable for you with a human more
precise translation in your usual familar language. The French text is
denoted as:
"comptfr.htm"
Actually it is a tree process. The root of the tree is the unity part from
there are growing branches of growing quantities. The universe
quantity is a tree. Each quantiy is at a step of the successive growing
form where there is no void between successive quantities.
This above figure shows how a spatial element (AB) should be the
It is an exact expression.
The Succession is a concept that designates a concrete process of
discrete or elemental matters. It is because only one element can be a
succession of an another one. One element location should do one
bounce to be in a next localisation. In the immutable universe there is
the Conservation principle, that don't allows overlapping of matter.
Space locations as matter is then the space of successions of locations.
For example it is a contradiction for Continuum dogma to assert that
one can count in the Continuum. Because the first continuum definition
is that it is the No-Succession world.
Because in this case theses laws are not universal. No reason asserts
that our Universal Laws are made from Nothingness. If we note that
universal Law means "happening in the whole Ubiquity and also
Immutability or No-Time".
- détermination + de + Pi (China)
- c1 discontinuity (Japan)
Also, for any space scale, C1 represent the permanent relationship between a
surface and its double. Particularly, C1 contains the define ratio between a circle
surface to the square one circumscribed to it.
It consists here to produce a square (S) of aera equal to the circle (C).
After constructing and placing the little circle (C1) at the square center, two tangents
of (C1) drawn from corner A and B of the square intersect themself at point (M).
Result
The point (M) is the middle of the square (S) side. (M) is the middle of side EF of
square (S).
In fact, the tangent of circle (C1) is only a way for memory. The segment AM can be
defined by the intersection of (C2) and (C) at point (M). The aera of (C2) is twice the
(C1) one. See further figure for the circle aera definition.
Space-Cst= [(sqr(2.sqr(2)-1)+(sqr(2)-1)]2
TT = k.22;
or :
k = TT/4 = 0,78004843...
Important
The Dakhiometry can do complete calculations-by-construction for any
scale of figure. The scale defined here is only for everybody more easy
understading.
Actually.
There is a unique certainty about a length. It is the length of the
Space Constant. We are certain that this Constant length is both the
staight line and the curvilinear one! Wealthy consequences can be
deduced from this base.
- square inscribed in a circle, find the area of the circle (USA California)
It is easy to see that the square where a circle is inscribed has an aera
two time the one of the square inscribed in this circle.
So, the aera S of the inscribed square is equal to the half of the one of
the square where this corresponding circle is inscribed. We write as:
S = D2/2 or 2S = D2
C = (Pi/4). D2
C = (Pi/2).S
- pi+is+rational (UK)
- "mathamatic" + pi (Germany)
- pi + is + rational (USA)
I had exposed this problem all along my texts in this website here. It
was exposed all the aspects and consequences of the squaring a circle.
There was not only the quite particular aspect that an Old Pi is now
seeing as a simple trick to approximate a factor denoted as Pi, to
measure the circle circumference. Particularly, there is no ideologic
discourse in may texts. And if there are ideologies, they are from the
current world the ideology of them is to protect their stake and not
according to human reason of science.
Thus the squaring a circle is a general useful and indispensable key for
a human advanced knowledge. Because of it general quality, the Space
Constant is also the solution for the usual particular problem concerning
the circle the property of that was NEVER really known. For example,
amongst many possibilities, the Space Constant allows to know what is
This day on March 2008 is now really the "Pi Day". Because it is the
First Time that someone tells practicaly the numeral 3.12. Good! It
remains for the billion of little calculators on Earth to tell simply the
same truth. What a world more infinite than the universe!
- PI + in + "matematics" (Kyrgyzstan)
- mathematic (Poland)
Calculation layout
- formula pi (Portugal)
- pi compas (Mexico)
- pi + value (Ukraine)
regain his basic capacity of linking to rational space, the reality needed
for the life development.
- pi geometry (Croatia)
Fist pioneers!
Space-Cst= [(sqr(2.sqr(2)-1)+(sqr(2)-1)]2
R1 = (2.sqr(2)-1)
R2 = sqr(R1)
R3 = (sqr(2)-1)
R4 = R2+R3
Finally
Space-Constant = [R4]2
Segment AH = R2 = sqr(R1)
Pi Length = AP = (R4)2
Finally, how to do R4
squared?
Final result:
Note:
For example when the Space Constant Length by itself is chosen as this
Unit.
In spatial Language,
whatever is the choosen UNIT-Length:
The space structure of this above next figure and also the
Pi-Formula prove directly this
Diameter = Unit
Conjecture:
And now,
What is the meaning of the Absolute Space represented
precisely by the Space-Constant???
(Philippines)
AB = Pi
Perimcircle = Pi.MN
Perimsquare = AB.4
Then,
Perimcircle = Perimsquare
Or
Pi.MN = AB.4
Pi = (AB.4)/MN
Such equality comes from the reason that the quantity (4), is no more
than the SCALING FACTOR for the Pi, in any figure scale.
It is why
in Dakhiometry the old name Pi, is more Justly denoted as the Space
Constant provided that it value is always valid in any space scale.
Fantastic isn't?!!!
Result
In summary
The universe Absolute Space is characterized to have the two
properties of being Curvilinear and Linear.
The Absolute Space is then defined by ONE Constants in the two
forms concerning the Quadratic and the Linear ones. They are
given through the Circle to the Square Transformations.
The unique Space Constant construction is given in its two forms on
the above figure and next under two numeral form representations:
Under such spatial forms, the direct and the reciprocal of circle versus
square, can be get easily when is given AB or MN.
It is to don't-forget-me.
In anciant time Euclide try to see the factor that link between a circle
and a line. This comes from the fact that a running wheel performs a
rotation cycle with its diameter. It is the same problem that
Archimedes temps to resolve. It is to resolve the circle circumference
with equivalent polygons.
Thus the classical Squaring a Circle is concerned only to know the
circle diameter as a factor given by a circumference Length. Extended
to the aeras equality is due only to that it was supposed that the
diameter of a circle is probably concerned as a common factor.
But really, Aeras or Circumferences are not clearly defined as a "to be
or not to be" way for resolving the squaring a circle.
Thus logically, it should be stated that:
When one had done the squaring a circle, one should underline
this common factor as both the Aeras and the Lines as this
equalities or this unity in the circle-square equivalence.
Consequently, this unity has the main meaning of the Universal
Transformation Constancy, the property of that defines the
concretness of the Absolute Space.
... the perimeter of this cercle and this square with its new aera.
Actually, it is because this new square is in fact, the result of this
circle squaring. Really, the squaring a circle has the simultaneity
property for the universe Beginning event where process of
construction was starting at a whole. It is the characteristic of the
whole universe Absolute Space. This explain the pertinency of the
Dakhion ubiquity as a physical property.
Actually.
It can be noted that the squaring a square is neither forbidden nor
impossible. One can do easily the squaring a square, with a circle as a
relational medium.
- transcendentaal pi (Netherland)
Really, the circle is intrinsic to any linear figure. The circle is trully the
root origin of Forms in the universe. Forms in the universe is as the Tree,
where the root is the Cricle Circle properties. It is why the Space is both
Isotropic and Homogeneous. At the origin, the Space is in Permanent
state. At this time tne universe is circular and the spase is only Isotropic.
When appeared the Linear property in space, this latter get the property
on being in the capacity of matter in mutual interaction. The universe
Beginning can then started according to the event of the Squaring the
Circle process for the fulness of Isotropic and Homogeneous Space
properties.
We can actually determine all the principles from there are originated all
the Truth as a Whole that we human can access. All the truth from there
are formed our rational knowledge.
Next figure resumes a more deeper inside view of the Squaring a Circle
properties.
In fact, there are really a double equivalent results given by the squaring
problem solutions. The Key (AB) of this problem gives rise to two
It show that the ratios between the three Circles and the three Squares
circumscibed to theses circles are equal to the same Space Constancy
divided by 4.
A) - A Length.
B) - An Aera.
C) - And a Right-Angle.
Fantastic isn't?
In fact, the Circle produces a turnkeySquare or a ready-made
Square for the Beginning of the universe construction.
Note
A such universal Constancy in the universe space misrepresents
the Einstein's Relativity where his mass-spatio-time can be
deformed at any time and where the Space can have no
determined form.
- pi + length (Hungary)
Note
All these calculations rest on logics justified by perfect reasons that are
not exposed here but can be verified by everyone everywhere in the
world.
- miracle geometry
This next figure resumes all the above spatial constructions. It is here
no more any resolution of old Pi using the impotent Geometry.
It is not the case for the old Geometry. This latter is only a
cobventional drawing that of figures replacing the words of a
given talking language. That is to tell the Geometry may more
efficient if one replaces it by cartoons or diagrams. Geometry is
only a conventional incomplete language as like for the different
Number systems. There, the symbols are only conventions. Like
the modern numeric systems, that is no more than conventional
technique for defining words that may carry any conventional
meaning.
With the Spatial Language the difference is that this latter allows
to directly work on the universe Space by using it on direct
homothetic samples. The universe Space has precise basic
alphabets when are used allows the direct understanding of the
universe phenomena.
One can not clamed that hi is inventing the Suaring the Circle and
consequently the Pi Value, if he dont know completly the Spatial
Language... because the Squaring a Circle is directly the
consequences of the Spatial Language Definition. There are more
interesting consequences about the Squaring-Circle that are not
yet exposed here. Particularly the squaring-a-Circle directly from
pure circle elements.
Conclusion:
We had gotten this formula according to spatial analysis of the Spatial
Constant, given by the squaring a circle.
What is done there:
We was doing there the reciprocal of this formula according to the same
spatial method.
It consists to find from a square, the basic remanences of circle from
where a square is structured: the Space Constant. Because in a square,
there is no known data to determine this Constant (3.12...) while only
the circle properties allow to get it. In brief, a square can be
transformed into a circle only and only, when a squaring a circle is yet
known.
All the numerical values that we meet along the squaring a circle are
only used because of the standard habit of Algebraic an Arithmetics
only known by the current Mathematics.
- extraterrestrial + "prrof"
- why+pi+is+rational
- pi+is+rational
- exact+rational+value+of+pi
The circle aera proof can be done only when a Space Constant is
known. This latter allows to do the squaring a circle. Next, with
the Space Constant the squaring a circle can appear. This step is
the event of the possible measurement conscience for knowledge
of the universe. Finally, according to the measurement possibility
of a Space Constant as reference, the circle aera can be now
formulated.
Considering this next figure and with the Lamca theorem giving the
equivalent rectangles from a square, the circle aera is directly given in
the circle-square spatial structure.
S = AM
2
Therefore:
S = AM2 = AP.AD
According to the squaring a circle, the square aera is equal to the circle
(C) one.
It suffice now to examine this figure to read and express the theorem
of circle aera. This latter is directly defined in the space structure when
the squaring a circle is resolved.
With AP = Space-Constant,
the aera of the circle (C) is there precisely equal to:
Or practical expressed:
The aera of a circle is equal to its Diameter time the Space Constant.
a) - Note that the squaring a circle can be done with the condition that
the square aera is equal to the aera and/or the circonference of the
initial circle. Therefore this above statement is a quite exact and
precise one.
b) - To prove it, consider this next figure. This latter shows that the
diameter AD of circle (C) is equal to it radius squared (R2).
Explainations:
Because we have according to the squaring a circle:
aera (C) = AM2 = AP.AB = AP.AD = Pi.AD
with AP=Pi and also:
AD = (AD/2)2 = (AD2)/4
Thus, with AD=4,
circle aera = Pi.AD = Pi.(AD2/4) = (Pi/4).AD2
As the squaring a circle happens when the square aera is equal both to
the circle aera and its perimeter then,
While stating only the circle aera we get both the aera and the
perimeter of the circle ones! Therefore, reading directly from the
squaring a circle structure we get the basic complete two circle
theorems as follows:
May be, the ratio of two sides in a triangle is the ratio of the square
root of this two sides squared.
Application
A sphere aera can be calculated with an algorithm using
successive circle aeras.
Algebraic Integral calculus is only an approximation. There is
proof using straight edge and compass that shows precisely a
such aera construction of the sphere. From that, one can define
any part of a such spherical aera.
The Space Constant is a more fertile basic space property than what is
known with the Anciant Pi. This latter is only a means for measurement
of a circle.
The Archimedes' pi is accurate within 1/10 (3.1...) what ever are the
decimal digits of a computer used.
In Fact, there is nothing else than the Space-Constant. The Pi is only man
anecdotal history.
Particularly, the two caracterized circle denoted as (C1) and (C2) are
representative to this structure constancy.
Consequently,
The ration (AC/AD) represent the space constancy of circle/square
system.
This figure show why in any figure scale the space-constant is truly
immutable and consquently the Space-Constant is a true universe
Fact.
Important
It should be noted that the two circles (C1) and (C2) is the proof
that the square-root of 2 is a Constant.
Therefore, the (square root of 2) is a rational quantity
because a constancy is necessarily a rational precisely
determined value.
Statement of Space-Constant TT
TT = 4[S/(D2)]
TT = 6[V/(D3)]
These above (TT) for aera and volume show that space is characterised by
two realms that are the Linear and the curvilinear oneS. As space is the
universal unity then it must be some relationship linking these two space
forms. A such something should be universal and should not be particular
arangements in space construction.
It is why this space unity is the simple spatial constant denoted here ad
the (TT). This is a new concept that has nothing to do with the Anciant Pi
attached to the difficulties of measuring a circle.
Aside this theorical statement for the Constant (TT), its uniqueness is also
illustrated in practice. It can be proved in Dakhiometry that this Constant
Fundamentally
The circle transmutes in structure to reveal space elements in possible
conscience of measurement. This is the birth of a square the Anciants
denoted as the life birth. The meaning of the squaring a circle from
that measurement conscience in space was possible. Therefore, the
statement of the squaring a circle should be as follows!
TT = 4[(S)/(D2)]
TT = 6[(V)/(D3)]
S(1-TT/4)
s(TT/4)-[S(1-TT/4)] = S(TT/2 - 1)
These figure are wholy inscribed in the space structure. They can be
constructed precisely. Therefore, a common simultaneously tangent at
these sfigure can be determined by construction.
You will see that the space constant is a most usefull key for
understanding the solid form.
Je le vous dirai lorsque j'aurais exposé les surfaces et les volumes des
solides, après les avoir justifié sur des fondements. La Constante de
l'Espace, y joue un grand rôle principal.
Mon œil.
Même en géométrie des parallèles se rejoignant à l'infini, on ne peut
faire de telle prouesse..
Maintenant, essayez de tracer un trinagle de 60 degrés en tout, somme
de ses trois angles, vous verrez que vous ne pouvez plus dormir.
Cependant, un cercle de 60 degrés peut se faire dans une Géométrie où
l'angle droit est égale à 30 degrés. Essayez d'abord de fabriquer une
telle Géométrie... où l'on perd non seulement le Nord mais aussi, son
Latin. Il est possible que le jour où le mathématicien, las, avait renoncé
à monter une telle folie à 30 degrés et après avoir vidé toutes ses
bouteilles à 55 degrés seulement, qu'il se résignait à revenir vers sa
Géométrie sagement sphérique.
AP.
2R=1/AP
- Singapore (Indonesia)
The solution here is a true one according to the theorem of the circle
always defined by three points.
When three points are on a line then this line is the maximum circle of
the universe with the maximum universe length as diameter. When this
three points are on a same location then it is the ultimate elemental
circle.
The theorem is:
Three points define always an unique circle because they define
the total space directions.
The logic property of discrete point succession is then use to prove that
the Universe Great Circle is also rationally determined according to any
three given points.
At the figure rigth is shown how to define the universe Great Circle by
choosing 3-points (A, B, C) on a line. It can be seen that "line" (ABC)
should belong to the universe Great Circle according to the above law.
Finally:
arcs (BA + AC + CB) = 180°
Conclusion
A) - A, B, and C define necessarily a circle according to that three-point
in curvilinear succession define one unique circle.
B) - According to the following theorem of inverting length, then the
ration (1/zero) is necessarily the Greatest Circle diameter of the
Discrete and finite universe.
Important property
At the universe scale There is no more distiction between linear and
curvilinear mode. This a logic consequence that can explain why the
immutable elemental matter activity is done along a straight line. This
allows to state that the electromagnetic action comming from far away
stars hit the Solar system in perfect straigth line manner. Only
refraction in media can deviate the media light phenomena.
- discretness (Ukraine)
The basic reason for any science is that the universe is the one of
Discrete matter.
That means if there was not any matter then there is no universe
because the universe matter is a Quantity et not some nothingnesse.
The ultimate matter is at least One Elemental matter. This latter is
necessary this elemental quantity.
Therefore,
In conclusion
The Zero-is-not-a-number but only the ultimate one elemental matter:
the dakhion. This give rise to the definition of the minimal One Point
that necessary constitutes Lines and Curves in the Space.
Inverse of length
Note
This construction is directly derived from
the Lamca theorem. It allows to state an
usefull theorem for inverting any length
AP!
For the Number system, the ZERO is useful only to delimit the series-
of-Counting-Numbers Zone. For example:
One can see that with all preceeding tools it can be done yet many
precise constructions in space.
Now we can proceed to choose and to define this circle as an unit circle.
However
Note that all this new method remains quite inefficient even if one use
the most Famous of most Great Anciant mathamatician invention, the
Famous Number 3.14 of the Great Modern Conservative human though.
Unhappily, independently of any reason, everybody is "free" to chose to
what he want to obey to.
Important Remark
One may note there, that spatial language is the most simple. However
it needs the capacity of an overall vision of space to be abble to
discover the wealthy basic space structure.
Discussion:
In a such figure, any square can give any rectangle of equal aera. Thus,
the segment AP is of any length. That is to say: may any length AP be a
Space-Constant?
though.
Unhappily, all of this Planet world are yet practised the millenarry
immutable an indestructible old erroneous Pi value...
Square root of 5 is done as for the 3 one on this figure by replacing the
length 3 by the one of 5.
Square root of decimals are done with the same construction. It is
because the decimal convention is only the homothetic for language of
numbers. Number Languages are necessarry full of holes due to the
impossibility to conventionally name the so numerous objects in
continuity of space. While spatial homothetic property is recurrently
continous even if space is discrete. The recurence principle is a
principle of continuity of no-hole space-reality.
From these bases we can see that a dimensionless point can never be
located. Thus it can't be measured because dimensionless point is
unconsciousness and can't never be measured. The dimensionless point
is the consequence of the Anciant' incapacity to know what is Space.
From a such bad foundation of space it grew the Continuum belief. And
many examples of indefined space can be seen when Mathematics
proved that "a Part is greater than a Whole" and also, the modern
difficulty of defining the Real Numbers set where dimensionless point
leaves a line made of holes from where Mathematics created the
so-called many difined Infinity Sets. With the incapacity of knowing
what is space, the old and modern Mathematics have no foundation to
be classed as advanced sciences.
Logics proof:
There is the real fact of Narural integer Numbers. Although Rational
and Irrational numbers may be mixed on a line, these two types of
number worlds are necessarily incommunicable between them.
If one can produce from irrational numbers some rational ones then, one
produced there a contradiction to irrational numbers. The above examples
show this contradiction. Therefore, Irrationality is only a FALSE
FORMALISM.
This proves that there is a quite FALSE and virtual Irrational World
built by Mathematicians with a False Euclidean Division method. This
latter confusion gives rise to the current Irrationality Belief.
What is irrationnal...
is precisely the Human Irrationality Concept characteristic!
More serious:
This whole current World is guilty to be blind continually on all the
rational reasons of science exposed by the Dakhiometry.
Actually, any number of different series types can be applyed with this
Root-n following formula as square root.
The following formula is under usual Algebraic form however, it can be
spatialy constructed in figures. This give the best proof of rational and
precise constructions for any length quantity representation. There, any
line is really precisely the continuous formation of space quantity.
Actually!
According to the current Theory of Numbers,
A Theorem of
Any Root n of Number (x), is statted as follows:
Calculations Examples :
Pay attention:
It is there not a pleonasm. Because in Mathematics, an irrational number
[root p (x)] is defined as a particular number quite different from an
integer x.
Mathematician should define two different numbers:
Conclusion
Really, if one find an equality between an Irrational number and an
Integer one,
it is the proof that the famous Irrational Root of numbers is directly and
concretly related and belong to the Rational Natural Integers. Therefore,
there is not Irrational Numbers but only a bad Euclidean mathematic
division method based on Exhaustion search.
There should not some missing space. If there is one, it comes from
approximation practise.
Because the squaring a circle proves that
there is Conservation of Space between the
The truth is reached only when one can get what is the real
conscienciousness of the physic around him. The most basic material
presence that can never vanishe is what everybody can be sensitive. It
is the material Space. Therefore, being conscious of the space is to
know how to measure it and to act with and on it. We denoted it as the
fundamental universal language of space. Because a real basic of
language allows to exchange, to transform in uniqueness and
multipilicity system.
All of statistic mechanics use the Pi. Examples are given with the Gaus,
Fermi, Dirac, Bose, Einstein, Maxwell, Bolzman,... ect. This Pi come
from integral and trigonometric functions where one uses mathematic
three times its diameter. From these usual practise the circle perimeter
as a proportion of its diameter remain until now. Because nobody can
tell the exact means to measure a circular line then, the corresponding
of a circle perimeter with its diameter became an remains until now as
some mysterious trick for the human thought.
Now AB should have the possibility of the two basic motions: le linear
and the rotation ones. That is one point mass A and B should move in
an elemental displacement L. Also, AB should rotate around its center
O, but necessarry in elemental angle quantity (a). But because the
displacement quantity L is necessarily the one of A and B then, the
elemental angle (a) should ne determined by the linear elemental
length L.
This rotation is really a basic rotation. But it can be seen that A and B
don't follow a circular line. A and B is displacing along linear polygonal
trajectory. Therefore, rationnally it is contradictory to state that "Pi is
three time the diameter of a circle".
There are really vistual audio frequenty when ears are becoming idle
for golden agers...
Solution
The direct solution of this construction is to
use the different angles properties in a
square. Therefore, the maximum cylinder
volume is placed in a half-sphere
according to the immutable angle (A) of
any square.
Here we have to place angle (A) from the
center (O), symmetrically to the vertical
axis, of the given half-circle.
this angle intersects the circle at two points (M) and (N). These latter is
the diameter of the cylinder base which has the maximum volume in
the half-sphere (C).
Note
This proof is valid for any cone and cylinder having a same vertical or
inclined axis, but with their base on a same plane. This canonical figure
shows how to construct section of a such maximum cylinder in a cone.
Theorem
A volume of any cone is precisely inscribed between two volumes
of a first cylinder where it is inscribed in and a second one of
maximum cylinder that is inscribed in it. These two types of forms
must have a common axis.
Valencia)
Naturally, these inscribed forms equalities are valid for any common
axis forms and not only for straight axis in square section.
According to that:
GH = L = BC/2 = h/2
Then, the volume of the cube of side GH is:
V(cube GH) = h3/8
That give:
L3 = h3/8
Finally the third root of (L3) is:
L = h/2
Results:
Because the volume of the cylinder correponding to the cube where it is
incribed. It is as:
V(cyclinder GH) = (Pi/4).V(cube GH)
Then, we can consider that the maximum of the cylinder volume is the
maximum if the one of its correponding cube GHEF.
It is because a cube or a parallepipede inscribed in the cube of side BC,
is maximum in volume if, all its sides are equal to BC where it is fully
filling thoughout the volume of its container where it is inscribed.
Conclusion
Therefore, the maximum of the cylinder inscribed in the cone ABC of
height and diameter (h), has precisely its heigh and its diameter (L)
equal to:
L = h/2
Consequence:
The volume of cone ABC is equal to 8 times the one of the cone GMH,
Dakhiométrie
Générale formule de fonctions puissances.
Example ici de construction pour la forme du parabole
- diagram schematic de parabolas (Dominican Republic)
- how to draw a circle tangent to a line and a circle (Norway, Intility din
IT-avdeling)
Until now Geometry while knowing how to draw a circle with a compass
it ignores what is a really a circle. The Geometry realm is only a linear
one. It is why this lack in knowledge give rise to irrationnality, the
incommensurable space Holes. In Mathematics curves are only
simulated by approximative Algebraic tools. Simulation is never a
precise definition method. Space is not created and can't be never
described only by lines. It is the case for number theory of the Line of
Reals number definitions.
Space is not obly Linear but necessarily Linear-And-Circular. More
exactly tell with a just order of reasons, basic space is Circular
generating Linear structures.
Only with a such basic understanding, human sciences can have a more
understanding on behavior of any object in space, the space on Earth
and the extraterrestrial space. The Dynamics is only a primary
simulation for beginning of a science. The forces is a verry narrow tool
for defining movement. Only true relationships according to space
structures is the authentic science knowledge of universal laws.
The following figures may appears as usual innocent ones. But really,
from there can be deduced precisely the how and the why are the
changes in the universe. True knowledge begings on reserach about the
absolute space and sciences begin there.
and more generaly, when (Y) is any quantity form one usually writes it
under so many algebraic number formalisms. Example given as root or
exponetial forms...
However, this is here a more generalized view point through spatial
figure forms. The usual geometric or algebraic parabola is nothing than
a very particular understanding of a more complete spatial structure.
In Dakhiometry, a parabola is nothing else than a whole spatial complex
description. For example, in spatial language, a parabola relationship
can represent an aera of a square! It is a new understanding of the
Potential law of matter in space. With basic understanding of matter
there is an unique science of matter. There is no dichotomy between
pure Ppatial Language and Physics.
Generalization
Therefore, we have there the precise general formula of spatial
constructions for all power functions where are included the parabola,
hyperbola and exponent forms.
All these functions rest on an unique basic second degree parabola form
construction.
Note
A parabola is a form belonging to the space structure. Consequently,
exponent functions are also space structure. The Algebraic forms are
only imperfect and approximations understanding of space when using
Numbers of conventional language.
Important Notes
If you are asking for such known problem, may be it is because
you want to know how is my answer about the "gravity" provide
that the classical known gravity is the Newton's central force one.
The parameter (a) here, is the location potential of a system that
have a Rest-point because, a Constant gravity as the (g) is false
as general factor. The (g), e.g. as 9.8, is false because the
Newton's Universal Gravitation is only a false empirical
hypothesis.
The true universal law of space is that any celestial system is
basically the space duo parameters Potential/Rest-point.
Therefore, in such system, the gravity factor denoted here as (a),
should be an accelerated gravity factor of object falling motion
toward the Rest-Point. This is because the trajectory distance is
the square root of potential energy.
Remind that the Newton's central force is inversely proprtional to
the squared distance denoted as function of (1/R2). So, the usual
use of Earth gravity as (g=9.81) is only an approximation for
cases of Earth surface objects. But this central force theory
implies that the pressure in the Earth center is very high. While
with the Potential/Rest there is no such contradiction. A rest point
for an object means its equilibrium situation. Therefore, near the
rest point there is two cases of equilibrium:
bodies as how they are formed and why a star and a galaxy
systems can appear as universal orbiting systems.
It is clear that the Newton's Central Force is not only a quite
simplistic but also a false model.
You may have your own solution. Here is an another one proposed.
Note
These constructions are nice
generators of hyperbola from all the
locus of (C) centers. Axis (x;y) of
these hyperbola are determined by the
middle of tangents from (P) to the fixe
circle (Co). OP is the bisector symmetrical axis of (x;y) angle. The
middle of OP is the axis intersection. It is clear that axis (x;y) are limits
of these hyperbola. These locus are really hyperbola because it is clear
that these axis are their limits as asymptotes. While a parabola can't
have any asymptote.
- a circle and its tangent which show the properties at the point of
tangency. (Carolina, USA)
This figure show how we can get the orthogonal axis hyperbola when
tangent from point P to (Co) form a rigth angle. The whole hyperbola is
generated by symmetry on the bisector axis for (Co) and P positions.
Conclusion
Conical belong wholy to rational and precise space structure. The
consequences are of great fertility.
For example, this next figure can be a collector at the focal (F), of the
surrounding electromagnetic and sound energy in a solid angle. An
another practical application is to use the hypebolic surface to produce
dimmed headlight of cars.
Note
With the squaring circle law the unit solid angle denoted as (sr)
steradian, can be precisely defined as a circle of a sphere instead of
refering to a square surface. On this figure the solid angle is the one
with center (O) of sphere (Co).
machines.
May be.
The so-called Conic is from the Anciant's empirism the thinking mode is
to Things and then to "analogically think" their everyday observations.
What is "conic?
One nows that Conic is originated from curiosity seen according to the
different Figures of light shadowed on this cone.
Conclusion:
As light is linear then, the Conic are from Linear Figures. Whatever are
the algebraic function formalism and the semingly "curves" of these
conic functions,
ANY CONIC FORMALISM IS QUITE FROM LINEAR FUNCTION!
Therefore, I am sorry to tell them that all of the "conic" given in this
present text are precisely from Curvilinear constrution ones!
Consequently:
Any of the current Conic described in the current Mathematics have to
be thrown avay.
All of any functions is NECESSARY defined by CIRCLES!
There is ONE basic universe Circular Function that shows the property
of the universe Circle not as the endless Infinity/Nothingness but as the
Permanence of a Circle. The Perimeter of a circle is not the infinity of
Beginning and the Infinity of its Endless as was stated by Moebius. The
truth is that the perimeterr of a circle is the symbol of the Permanence.
Definition of an asymptote
Let a function y = f(x) (f-1),
1) - (f-1) has no asymptote if (x) and (y) are simultaneously unlimited
quantities.
2) - (f-1) has an asymptote if only (y) goes toward zero when (x) goes
to unlimited quantities and inversely.
c) - Perimeters of an ellipse and the one of a circle are cyclic and have
no linear infinity. Therefore, generation of an ellipse is limited and has
no unlimited variation and no asymptotic conditions.
This error is originated from Anciants studies on conic that had a partial
view on parabola and in continuation for modern Mathematics. We see
there that the line plus a point for conic are artificial Mathematic
definition.
Conclusion
The present parabola and hyperbola exposed above in this text are
really a parabola an a hyperbola precisely and rationally defined
according to spatial language..
qui ne dit rien si c'est que plus c'est compliquée, plus les Maths sont
forts. Cette tare est transmissible par contagion pour le formatage des
esprits des générations et générations de scolastiques.
Par expérience vécues, je sais que tout ce monde dit de science est
sourd aveugle et muet du penser.
Je vous laisse, essayer de sortir de vos coniques maladroits et fausses,
servant depuis des siècles à racconter des bobards sur la mécanique
céleste et qui continue encore malgré les résultats que je présente en
public sur Internet, depuis déjà 12 ans!
Dans le cas des figures classées comme conique, elles sont des
variations d'une même raisons de base. Ses aspects ne sont pas des
dispersions de similitudes que l'on a mis dans un même sac par
analogie formaliste. Elles sont bien l'unicité dans sa diversité. Le voir
ainsi appartient au domaine de la connaissance alors que ses
applications sont des qualités de science exacte.
La figure ci-contre, indique la définition pratique commune de tout
conique. Elle se fait par le triangle isocèle PFH. P est un point d'une
conique dont F est le focal et H un point de sa directrice. Il n'est
représenté ici que la parabole et l'hyperbole. L'ellipse n'y est pas
indiqué puisqu'il n'est pas encore explicité ici. Mais l'ellipse fait partie
de cette définition commune.
Conséquences
Tout l'espace de l'univers, peut être décrit par la forme de
conique. L'univers est un cercle et du cercle peuvent s'exprimer pour
la Condensation de la matière en astres qui se fait selon la
dégénérescence du cercle vers l'ellipse. Cette transformation est
l'expression du Potentiel de l'Espace en énergie cinétiique. L'Astronomie
est intéressée par la description des formes coniques. L'ellipse concerne
la formation des systèmes astraux. Puis, en interne seulement aux
systèmes astraux, peuvent s'appliquer le parabole et l'hyperbole.
1) - Expression de la connaissance:
Après la transformation du Cercle en carré qui est génération des
Directions en Distance, la mesure de l'espace peuvent se faire par
dégénérescence du cercle en expression selon les lois de coniques. La
dégénérescence du cercle se fait par dissociation du point centrale, qui
ne peut s'exprimer qu'en Direction, en deux points séparés marquant
de la Distance.
2) - Expression de science de mesure:
Tout l'espace de l'univers peut alors se décrire à partir de deux
sommets référencés d'un triangle isocèle, pout pour définir le troisième
sommet dans la totalité de l'espace univers. C'est là la vraie expression
des coniques.
Alors que les Mathématiques restent figées depuis des millénaires, sur
quelques spécificités des formes de paraboles, d'hyperbole et d'ellipse,
on peut constater la connaissance pleine de l'espace en Dakhiométrie.
Ainsi, sur la figure, on peut voir que dans le triangle isocèle PFH, si l'on
se réfère aux deux points F et H, on trouve dans l'espace les formes de
parabole, d'hyperbole et d'ellipse, décrivant par le troisième point P.
Mais que si l'on se réfère aux deux points {P, F} ou {P, H}, on trouve la
forme-source qui est celle d'un cercle. En variant les paramètres du
triangle PFH, on peut ainsi décrire toutes les variances de point de la
totalité de l'espace. C'est bien le cercle qui est la Source de toute
forme de l'espace. Ceci n'est que la réciproque. Parce qu'avec l'ellipse
on trouve la preuve du théorème directe où, d'un cercle, il naît une
ellipse et les autres formes de base de coniques. Voilà la science vraie
des lois de l'espace où il n'y a pas de dichotomie fantaisiste, un
mauvais mirage entre "Mathématiques et la Physique" ou Esprit-
Matière.
La voici:
1) - Il n'y a pas de mouvement absolu de l'objet, lorsque l'objet
est au point de repos.
2) - Il est en equilibre-par-le-mouvement, lorsqu'il n'est pas en
son point de repos.
La qualité des joueurs de billard est d'avoir l'esprit géomètre très aigue.
On le voit se manifester à coup sûr, par les champions qui voit l'espace
du billard non de manière analytique mais, cet espace dans son entier
complet, où il n'y a plus de passé ni de futur. C'est ça, l'espace.
Alors, avec un billard bien au point en forme d'ellipse, je crois que les
joueurs s'en régaleraient à y concevoir leurs coups magiques avec
précision. Parce que l'espace d'une ellipse est très bien plus riche en
relations spatiales que celles d'un rectangle.
Actually.
Because universe space is pure absolute structure. Therefore, matter
should be constructed according to self portant structure. It is why
archtectural estetic can found construction founding on natural function
logic without which geometrical forms are only coagulated sceneries.
In practice most of stars orbits are done as elleptic ones but not as a
perfect circle.
It is because they are not precicely done on a given iso-potential
circle. It is because stars are form from the Matter Condensation
Process where the energy distributions are not done by discrete
manner from the initial elemental matter cloud. Therefore a star is
composed of:
EP + ER + Edelta(R)
The circle (C) of this system defines the characteristic of the initial
personal cloud from where the star was formed from a larger star
system. For example Matter-condensation produces the Galaxy, Star
series, Star systems and Planet systems.
One can note that in space everything is basicaly from a circle, not
only for the Square but particularly also for the Elipse forms.
According to the circle (C) one may note that it is wrong to tell
as by Kepler did it that an orbital ellipse has TWO FOCUS.
The truth is that an ellipse should be defined from a centered
structure defined by a Circles (C). It is a general property
from the Dakhiometry that allows to define all the ellipse
spatial form properties as aera and volume of ellipsoides.
One can note on this next figure that the ellipse (MN) form is
produced by two circles (C1) and (C2) rotating on the main circle
(C). The two ellipse focus is only a secondary property
consequuences!
- spherical astronomy
From a circle (C) and any point (F1) of any of its radius and from (C)
center (F2), an isoscele triangle (F1PE) defines a point (P) of an unique
ellipse with diameter (MN). When (F1) goes until the (C) circonference
then, the figure define a pure Circle construction that is defined as
follow:
A circle is generated by a isoscele triangle (F1PE), the summit (P) of
which is a fixed point while the side (EP) is a constant length.
Construction
a) - From any given fixed point F1, draw any segment EF1
b) - Draw TP, a median of EF1
c) - Join E to F2 that intersect TP at point (P) as one of the ellipse to be
formed.
Note that point (P) is the construction of the center of a circle internally
tangent to (C) and to this latter internal point F1.
Explicitly tell,
EF2 = radiusC = Constant
EP = PF1; as isoscele triangle sides
Then,
PF1+PF2 = EP+PF2 = EF2 = Constant
The altutude TP of the tiangle isoscele (F1PE) are tangent to the ellipse
formed. Many others of the ellipse properties are deduced from this
basic spatial structure. For example, the ellipse center is defined by the
line joining the middle of two sides of the isoscele triangle intersecting
the diameter MN. On this figure is shown it as line (TO) where (O) is
the ellipse center.
The main principle of this transformation is that the Circle can divided
itself from one central center, into two separated ones. It is the case
seen for an alive cell multiplication.
When this doubling of circle center happens in such manner that the
isoscele triangle is exterior to the circle (C) then, the figure
transformed is a hyperbola when point (F1) is a point and a parabole
when point (F1) is a line.
The 3D figure for solid surfaces, are obtained when we considered e.g.
the axis (y) as an axis of symmetry.
Application
For example, from a given square surface, defined as points of ellipse
or of hyperbola or of parabola, how can we determine their different
parameters such that all of them constitute the fullness of this given
square surface? It can be extended for a 3D volume.
Note
The current science of the Universal Gravitation laws has nothing to do
as Physics laws. It is quite an impotent fiction of man.
With deductive reasons as is for the Dakhiometry method, you will find
through these fundamental problems, the true universal laws of Matter
Condensation from where anything in the universe is constructed!
Moralité
Il est temps que je mets les points sur les "i".
1) - Chacun croit que c'est évident mais, cette structure peut décrire
rationnellement et précisément la formation des astres.
2) - L'ellipse n'a pas deux foyers interchangeables que l'on ne sait que
faire de l'un ou de l'autre. L'ellipse a deux centres dont l'un est l'Origine
et l'autre la Naissance. Les deux a des fonctions complémentaires de
Création ou de Construction des lois de la matière.
3) - Cette structure de l'espace exprime la structure des lois mêmes de
l'univers, dans ses manifestations de construction.
a) - Elle éclaire le mécanisme du développement complexe du vivant
comme multiplication en cellules. Une étude plus complète peut y
révéler l'histoire de la formation de la matière atomique.
b) - Aussi incoyable que cela paraît aux esprits de robot, cette
configuration de l'espace, exprime clairement que l'ŒUF et la POULE
est Un.
Ces remarques vous semblent de la fiction. Mais vous pouvez être sûr
qu'aucune imagination fantaisiste que l'on prête jusqu'à maintenant sur
les extraterrestres, n'arrive à la cheville de telles réalités rationnelles.
En déduction
Si l'homme sait compter, ce n'est pas parce qu'il y a des Nombres
comme modèle de l'univers. Il sait compter parce que la matière est
Quantité selon le Principe de Succession. Si la matière est accessible
par la quanrité, nous en déduisons que l'Espace matière est aussi
Quantité, selon la quantité de succession de localisations. Il y a donc
quantité de matière dans la quantité de localisation. Couramment, on le
désigne par Masse en un Centre dans l'espace. C'est pourquoi,
Etant quantité, l'espace est ABSOLU.
Logic of dicrete matter and space as Potential Energy imply that Motion
is necessarily ABSOLUTE. It is why the Dybamic definition of motion
with a Force is inconsistent because a Force law is a Relativity
expression according to that an acceleration is always a relativity
concept. Relativity means that motion can be measured only as motion-
in-background-of-motion. Relativity is generated from ignorance of
space reality where this latter is a contradictory concept of Infinity in
Nothingness. Nothingness is nothingness particularly it has no
dimension as for Mathematics, infinity is a dimension.
Preuves expérimentales
a) - Il n'y a pas de Mouvement sans la présence d'objet matériel. On ne
peut jamais prétendre attraper un Mouvement. Attraper signifie aussi
Mesurer.
b) - Etant une propriété de l'objet, le mouvement est absolu. Ce qui
signifie que l'on peut attrapper et mesurer le mouvement, en absolu. Il
suffit d'attrapper l'objet en question!
Jusqu'à ces lignes, vous êtes encore baba sur l'absolu du mouvement.
Mais, avec l'esprit moins formatté par les Savants des Institutions
Scientifiques, vous vous rendiez compte peut-être que,
EFFECTIVEMENT, on attrappe toujours le mouvement, dans la vie de
tous les jours!
Exemples:
1) - Quand vous portez un litre d'essence dans un bidon,
n'est-ce pas là le bidon, un moyen pour vous d'attrapper le
mouvement?
2) - Quand vous coincez l'eau dans une vallée, derrière la prison des
barrages hydrolyques,
n'est-ce pas là, le moyen d'attrapper le Mouvement?
3) - Quand vous vous donnez un mal fou de produire et conserver des
atomes de matière avec lesquelles, vous en tirez de l'énergie nucléaire,
n'est-ce pas là, le moyen d'attrapper le Mouvement, même rebelle?
4) - Quand l'on reçoit une baffe sur la figure,
n'est-ce pas là, une occasion de ne pas vouloir attrapper le Mouvement?
5) - Quand un athlète apprend à courir vite,
N'est pas là par le moyen de son corps, pour qu'il crée Son Mouvement
Absolu, rien qu'à lui, perdant ou gagnant?
6) - Quand, sur le sol on trébuche et tombe et que l'on grimace de
douleur,
n'est-ce pas là, le souhait de ne pas attrapper le Mouvement?
7) - Si vous ne pouviez pas résister aux cyclones,
n'est-ce pas là que le Mouvement n'est pas Relatif? Parce qu'avec cette
relativité, on peut tuer les mouvements du cyclone, comme deux trains
roulant de concert à la même vitesse, peuvent annuler leurs
mouvements relatifs.
8) - Pourquoi, les bateaux ne peuvent jamais être en totale sécurité sur
la mer agitée?
N'est-ce pas là, pour la même raison, que le bateau reçoit le
Mouvement Absolu de la mer et ne peut pas y échapper par quelle
méthode de mouvement relativiste.
9) - Quand on a rien de toutes les avantages précédentes,
N'est-ce pas là, l'absence de Mouvement, la Non-Exisrence, la
complétude de la Mort?
Alors,
Ajoutez [M.(vinconnue)2] dans la formule Relativiste d'Einstein,
E = [M.(vinconnue)2] + M.c2
Vous aurez incontestablement, la Mort dans l'Ignorance.
En conclusion:
Relisez ce texte en toute modestie.
Faites ce qui vous plaira, mais n'imitez pas par dévotion, l'Ignorance
des vieilles Sciences de la Croyance de l'homme, qui ne sont capables
que de fabriquer des moyens de Destructions de l'homme et de la
Terre.
- mécanique rationnelle
Vous allez dire "mais il ignore donc tout"? Il faut une sacrée claivoyance
pour faire cette remarque. Car celui qui SAIT TOUT, est celui qui ne sait
vraiment rien.
a) - L'espace matière est absolu, sans quoi il n'y a pas d'univers de ces
astres dans le ciel. L'espace est absolu tel que les chose peuvent y être,
sans quoi, personne ne peut savoir s'il y a le Nord, le Sud, l'Est et
l'Ouest ni non plus qu'elle-est, son ici-et-maintenant.
b) - Or si l'espace absolu est tel qu'il est pour chacun et pour tous à la
fois, il y a néanmoins des personnes qui ne reste pas en place. Chacun
voit le monde dans ses Mouvements. Tout se déplace aussi.
c) - Comment peut-on décrire l'espace qui Est et l'espace qui se
déplace en mouvement? Si l'on prend les obejts qui bougent comme
témoin de mouvement, on se soumet nécessairement à la relativité des
uns aux autres. Or si l'on ne pense au Mouvement, que seulement
comme un rapport des uns aux autres, c'est que l'on IGNORE que
l'espace est absolu et qu'il faut le décrire autrement que par le FIGÉ!
Par exemple comme Newton et tous les Savants scientifiques, sans
exception, qui n'ont que des notions relatives.
d) - Un effort pour accéder à l'idée que l'espace est fixe dans l'absolu,
mais que l'espace est aussi à la fois le Contenant et le Contenu. Ce qui
veut dire que le Mouvement est contenu par l'espace ou que l'espace
est Mouvement. L'espace matière est donc à la fois le Lieu et à la fois le
Déplacement du Mouvement
e) - La loi de l'espace univers où tout se construit sans cesse où il n'y a
de Permanence que le Changement, se lit, pour ceux qui le peuvent. La
loi de l'espace univers se lit directement dans l'espace, par le langage
de l'espace.
1) - Déplacement en cercle
a) Le lieu se réfère à 1 point fixe F1 et un point d'un cercle de centre
F2.
b) Les localisations dans l'univers de ce déplacement, est indiqué par le
sommet d'un triangle isocèle intérieur au cercle F2, dont (F1F2) est la
base.
2) - Déplacement en un autre type de courbe (ellipse)
a) Le lieu se réfère à 1 point fixe F1 et un cercle de centre F2.
b) Les points de localisation du mouvement sont indiqués par le
sommet d'un triangle isocèle intérieur au cercle (F2) dont un sommet
de la base se trouve sur le point F1 et le côté de l'autre passe par le
centre F2 du cercle.
3) - Déplacement en ligne droite
a) Le lieu se réfère à 2 points fixes F1 et F2. F1 et F2 peuvent être deux
cercles égaux.
b) Les localisations dans l'univers de ce déplacement, est indiqué par le
sommet d'un triangle isocèle dont (F1F2) est la base.
4) - Déplacement en courbe (hyperbole)
a) Le lieu se réfère à 1 point fixe F1 et un cercle de centre F2.
b) Les points de localisation du mouvement sont indiqués par le
sommet d'un triangle isocèle dont un sommet de la base se trouve sur
le point F1 et le côté de l'autre passe par le centre F2 du cercle.
5) - Déplacement en un autre type de courbe (parabole)
a) Le lieu se réfère à 1 point fixe F1 et une droite D.
b) Les points de localisation du mouvement sont indiqués par le
sommet d'un triangle isocèle dont les côtés sont pour l'un
perpendiculaire à (D) et l'autre passe par le centre F2 du cercle. Ici, le
cercle F2 peut être de rayon nul.
When he tell that any object goes toward its rest point, he didn't know
that he had an absolute space concept. However he was right.
The following spatial formulas can be easily done in practice of Arts. For
architectural drawing it can be realized with mechanic systems. There
are not only compass and rules for many practical uses.
Also, algorithms for computer can produce these different line forms, in
absolute situation without axis referent bothers of analytical geometry
calculations. This concerns 2D and 3D mode.
It may concern also robot movements where too much freedom axis
cannot be easily resolved by complicated analytical linear calculations.
Here is a Dakhiometry new space consept that, may be, is yet difficult
to conceive for mathematicians and physicians:
What we see as Movement in space is only simple forms and
complex form structures of a material system. This is the space
property consequence where form is potential energy. Therefore we
should see heavenly bodies systems as fixe forms and not as random
movements according to some virtual Universal Gravity. This form can
be transformed under any interaction. Hyperbola and parabola are also
fixe forms that don't go to "infinity". They are limited by the system
energy.
It is really such.
Because movement are phenomena of matter interactions.
Universe interactions are energy exchanges not for destruction
but always for construction. For exemple, from these five basic
movement functions it can be deduces the oval form of an egg.
The spatial construction of an ovale has nearly a structure like the
yolk in a bird egg.
Note
With the spatial language and according to the Absolute Space,
orbits of heavenly body, is not observed relatively from the Earth
as an ellipse form. Precisely any observation of heavenly bodies
relatively from the Earth, should be as a perfect oval form. Far
from the Earth this oval form can be confused approximatly with a
circle. But near to the Earth as the Moon does, the orbit of this
latter should appears in measurement as a pefect oval a little
streched in its longest axis.
Note
An artificial satellite with circular
orbit around the Earth is only an
absolute one. But relativeley to an
observer standing on the Earth
surface, the true observed orbit of
this satellite is as shown in this
next figure. This latter shows the relative orbit of a stallite at
1000 km altitude seen from a signal collector fixed on Earth. The
reality of hevanly orbits are Absolute ones and prove that tne
space is absolute. It is why the Einstein Relativities contradict the
universe reality.
Relatively from a fixed point on the Earth surface, any artificial
satellite should have rather an oval form!
This relative trajectory is not a virtual one calculated from an
Yes the two motions should be composed in the total relative one.
Yes the two motions should be composed in the total relative one.
It is why when we mesure only the distance between the
observer from the observed object while donot know the observer
motion, the result will be a virtual one.
Unhappily, it is the case for all the measures done in Astronomy!
From this real trajectory according to the real distance between the
earth from the Sun, we can note that the time of Hot-Sun is shorter
than the one of cooling Night during the Earth's 24h. Then, the
hot-house effect is quite invalidated. This so-called effect is more
pronounced when we consider this trajectory of real distance during a
whole year duration.
Consequently, on Earth it is the globe law as ring structure that furnish
a perpetual energy activity. There is not the Earth hot chore of magma
that is created by the Newton Gravitational law. A globe structure is
only deduced from the matter condensation process that in turn, rests
on the Absolute space potential/rest-point principle.
Note All these relative may seem too strange to you because until now
they are not mentionned in Astronomy.
However, these orbits are the everyday truth and practised by
everybody. For example any team playing ball are practising and
mastering such complicate relative trajectory. So when one run after a
ball, the one main thing is to look after this ball without worrying about
its trajectory form. While really, the whole ball trajectory is the most
complocated one. In fact the heavenly body relative trajectories are the
Note
All these spatial constructions of relative trajectories are reversible.
This is to say that if a relative trajectory is précisely measured then,
the absolute initial orbit of a heavenly body around its rest-center can
be deduced from there.
For example, if the relative orbit of Mars or Venus are measured then
their absolute orbit around the Sun can be defined. It is the possibility
for any star if their distance from the Earth can be well defined.
Therefore, science can proved that the Earth is not the Universe center.
Until now all the heavenly bodies orbit are defined theorically using the
hupothetic Newton's Universal Gravity as foundation. It is a false
method to search object location by the masses.
From this result, we can see that there are always stange behavior in
the different planet orbit, if astronomists are supposing that all the
planets of the Solar sytem are theoricaly a circle or nearly an ellipse.
From there they use the Relativity theory to justifyed any of this
strange orbital behavior.
All these values define the parabola inscribed in this two given
data. Also from given initial energy and angle of trajectory it can
be determined precisely and simply all the other such trajectory
characteristics.
The following figure shows the five basic FORMS seen as movements.
Figure resumes the Five Basic space stucture for universal laws of
movement.
1) - The two masses is the first down because there is no last arrived.
2) - The two masses is the last down because there is no first arrived.
In conclusion
Potential between Location in space ignore the mass quantity hierarchy.
Absolute space means that a same Potential corresponds to a
defined distance and inversely, whatever is the distance
direction.
One uses to tell: what a paradoxical law. Because one uses to think the
conventional Force, as the mass time the acceleration of an object...
Conclusion
Allez-y avec vos formules et baguette magique appelées Théorème de
(Pythagore, Thalès,... Newton, Einstein,...). Avec la vue Relativiste de
vos Dieux, dites moi ce que vous voyez à votre l'horizon. Je crois que le
fond d'un puit, ça s'appelle une impasse!
- mécanique rationnelle
Here is how to draw any decimal length, provide that a unit length is
defined.
Unluckily...
Finally
A circle is not really a form because it is only the remanence or the
persistence of vision or the memory of the matter space before the
beginning of the universe construction. A cirlce is only a BASIC
LOGIC of space!
The dakhiometry, text DK001EN (sep 2001) The Simultaneity and the
Conservation are notions of the Permanence of the universe.
The Accuracy, the Certainty and the Doubt (nov 2001) Mathematical
accuracy is a mechanical process while Certainty and Doubt are the engine of
the evolving Self. Some analysis of the Non Euclidean contradictions.
The Proof of the universe Evolution Process (oct, 2002) The beginning
of the universe construction used the squaring a circle to allows the central
symmetry to establish the left-right symmetry for the alive.
The Proof of the squaring a circle (oct, 2002) Proof of the surface
equality after the squaring a circle.
The basics of Matter. The proof of Thales' theorem. The proof of the
Pythagoras' theorem. (oct, 2002) Properties of Matter allows to state
some foundations on the knowledge. From these bases, simple proof can be
done one the Thales' and the Pythagoras' theorems.
New Proof of Light Refraction and Reflection Laws (dec, 2004) New
Proof according to the Dakhiometry method that shows that light is not a
particle and a wawe that may have a trip of 13 billion of celerity distance...
New Proof of Light Refraction and Reflection Laws (dec, 2004) New
Proof according to the Dakhiometry method that shows that light is not a
particle and a wawe that may have a trip of 13 billion of celerity distance...
Correspondences :
HOME