El Kholy
Presented by :
1. Safinaz Samir Abou Elata (Team leader)
Mobile number: 0187923166
e.mail : s.aboulata@yahoo .com
Table of Contents:
Abstract . page 1
Introduction. page 2
References
Appendices
Abstract
Families in this area are of total 302 family, sample size chosen is 5% (15
families) as, for ISDF size of population of the research is 25 officials,
sample size chosen is (15 officials)
Introduction:
The issue of this research is testing the two conflict management styles of
both parties, inhabitants of Ramlet Boulak slum area and authorities
(ISDF).
Moreover, the study of appropriate tools and techniques to manage the
conflict in order to,
Convince inhabitants evacuate to enable responsible authorities develop
and improve the area.
Where the slum area of Ramlet Boulak is located near very important
governmental and touristic
Establishments like radio and television union and the ministry of
external affairs, this area is classified by
the( ISDF) as slum unsafe area of the second degree, this slum area is
characterized by its high economic value which is not appropriate for
urban construction on it or with the activities performed by the
inhabitants ,more over the ISDF action regarding evacuation of such area
for reallocation
Of the area for the activities appropriate for its real value and saving the
inhabitants lives, the researchers while in this slum area conducting the
sample collection on Sunday 31st of October 2010 one of the buildings in
this slum area collapsed and one female died as a result of this accident.
In addition the inhabitants may oppose the evacuation of the slum area
due to some social and economical interests so ,we can assume that
conflict may arise due to the contradiction of interests between the
inhabitants and the( ISDF) responsible for the evacuation which requires
study and analysis of styles and Strategies of handling conflict.
Literature Review:
The researchers have applied the 5 A's techniques by Porisoff and victor
to identify the conflict management styles:
*Area profile: Ramlet Boulak slum area, total area 4 feddans, total
pieces 333, building area 3 Fadden, and classified as unsafe area.
*Sewage system:
Building is connected to ground tanks 189
Other: 43
Remaining undefined, 101
Total 333
*Electricity:
Connected to the network 220,
Other 12,
Remaining undefined, 101
Total 333
*Economical Activities:
Car tyres work shops, car reparing, carpenter workshop, oygen welding
workshop, retail shops (kiosks)
Competing collaborating
Compromising
Avoiding accommodating
3-Attitude:
This sort of communication tries to remove the foundation of pseudo
conflict, as well as perception which may blur meanings, the role of
effective conflict participant to maintain and open mind toward all parties
involved.
According to (ISDF) options and alternatives Ramlet Bolak inhabitants
responses are expected to be one of the following:
A- Willing to accept forms of offered compensation.
B- Ignoring the ISDF requirements by rejecting proposals.
C- Accepting the partner –ship proposal.
D – Obying the order to evacute with unfair compensation.
E- Asking for over valued compensation.
Each of the previous responses reflects a conflict management style of the
inhabitant side, it becomes clear that the compromise style is reflected in
case of accepting forms of compensation mentioned in number (A)
above.
An avoiding style is translated in form of rejecting all ISDF proposals
mentioned in number (B) above.
A collaborative style in case of partnership acceptance mentioned in
number (C) above.
Accommodating styles will arrise in case of evacuation with unfair
compensatrion – mentioned in number (D) above.
Finally a competing style is demonstrated in case of asking for
overvalued compensation mentioned in number (E) above.
5- Analysis:
Testing of the hypothesis reaching results will determine the review
(Analysis) (accepting the hypothesis) or not reviewing (not accepting the
hypothesis).
6
The methodology:
Tools:
The researchers have used conflict resolution questionnaire” consists of
25 questions designed to identify conflict styles of the respondents
translated into Arabic language, for the purpose of this research the
researches have used the five LiKert scale.
Sample:
Researchers have included the following demographic data to determine
the effect on conflict resolution style on respondents.
Gender Male Female
Parties Involved ISDF Inhabitants
Age 25-30 36 & above
The sample size chosen 30 people, 15 from each party: 63% male and
37% female.
Statistical tool :
Researchers used the excel program to analyze data.
Results:
The results showed a significant difference in the style of conflict
management between parties
Parties involved
1 2 3 4 5
ISDF 70 35 55 85 130
Ramlet 48 42 68 72 145
Bolak
140
Conflict Management presented to Prof /DR Sayed
El Kholy
Age
1 2 3 4 5
20-35 50 46 54 93 157
>36 68 31 69 64 118
160
140
Gender
1 2 3 4 5
Male 76 51 78 89 156
Female 42 26 45 68 119
160
10
140
References:
2- koura research institutes for human settlements (2006), the project for
conflict-Management-and-negotioation.html
Appendices
Questionaire
2. I am always willing to listen to other's opinions, but I also want to give them mine.
(1) Strongly disagree (2) disagree (3) neutral (4) agree (5) strongly agree
5. When someone else thinks they have a good idea I cooperate and help them.
(1) Strongly disagree (2) disagree (3) neutral (4) agree (5) strongly agree
9. When a conflict occurs, I tend to back out of the situation and do something else.
(1) Strongly disagree (2) disagree (3) neutral (4) agree (5) strongly agree
10. I don't like to rock the boat, so I cooperate with others and accept instructions
easily.
(1) Strongly disagree (2) disagree (3) neutral (4) agree (5) strongly agree
11. When pursuing my priorities, I am usually firm and not swayed by others.
(1) strongly disagree (2) disagree (3) neutral (4) agree (5) strongly agree
12. During conflict, I immediately work to get everyone's concerns out in the open.
(1) strongly disagree (2) disagree (3) neutral (4) agree (5) strongly agree
14. Differences of opinion are not always worth worrying about, so I usually avoid
them.
(1) strongly disagree (2) disagree (3) neutral (4) agree (5) strongly agree
15. I like to ask others for their opinions and try to find ways to cooperate.
(1) strongly disagree (2) disagree (3) neutral (4) agree (5) strongly agree
16. Once I have taken a position, I don't like to have others try to talk me out of it.
(1) strongly disagree (2) disagree (3) neutral (4) agree (5) strongly agree
17. When there is a conflict, I make a point of presenting my view, and I invite others
to do the same.
(1) strongly disagree (2) disagree (3) neutral (4) agree (5) strongly agree
22. I am a decision maker, but I make a point of listening to others to find the best
solution possible.
(1) strongly disagree (2) disagree (3) neutral (4) agree (5) strongly agree
24. I often keep to myself, because most things are not worth arguing about.
(1) strongly disagree (2) disagree (3) neutral (4) agree (5) strongly agree
أرحب بالستماع الى اراء الخرين و لكن أريد أن يستمعوا الى رأيي – 2
عندما ينشأ خلف دائما أعيد ترتيب أولوياتى حتى يحل الخلف – 8
ل أحب أن أضع العقبات و لذا أتعاون مع الخرين و أتقبل التعليمات بسهولة – 10
فى أثناء الخلف أعمل فورا على أن يعلن الخر عن اهتمامته – 12
أحب أن أسأل الخرين عن ارائهم و أوحاول أن أجد طريقة للتعاون معهم 15 -
عندما يكون هناك خلف أعبر عن وجهة نظرى و أدعو الخرين لفعل ذلك – 17
أرى أنه أكثر أهمية أن أتوافق مع الخرين من أن أكسب المناقشة معهم – 20
أنا صانع قرار و لكنى أستمع للخرين حتى أصل الى أفضل حل ممكن – 22