TEAM SHAMAYOYONESEE

[chad bunnell] [samantha peters] [ryan herr]

SITE ANALYSIS
1219 BROADWAY LUBBOCK, TEXAS

[ZONING CODE]
The zoning code for our current site is set for
CB-2. Central Busniess District

Broadway Traffic Flow from and to 1-27

[LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS]
90% of required front yard should be landscaped
10% hard surface is allowed in front yard
All landscaping shall be visible from public right
of way

123’
Interior courtyard landscaping shall not be

Site
13th Street

included in required landscaping.

Street Trees must be single stump.

Avenue K
Avenue L
An automatic underground irrigation system is
preferred.
116’

SITE CLIMATE CONCERNS:

[SET BACKS] ADVERAGE HIGHES: ADVERAGE LOWS:
The Front Yard shall be designated as that January 52 January 24

with the lot line adjacent to Dedicated Street. Feburary 58 Feburary 29

March 66 March 36
Front yard Setback: April 75 April 45
No less than the average setback of May: 83 May: 56

adjacent buildings June: 90 June: 64

July: 92 July: 68
Back yard and Side yard Setback: August: 90 August: 66
No requirements September: 83 September: 58
[PARKING] October: 74 October: 47

Off street parking requirements: Novemeber: 62 Novemeber: 35

Decemeber: 53 Decemeber: 26
Boarding or Rooming houses: 1 space
[OTHER PROPERTY LINE RESTRICTIONS] each per occupant
EMPLOYEE TRANSPORTATION IN LUBBOCK:
Setback Encroachments:
Bay windows, cornices, eaves, belt courses, All permitted uses not specifically
DRIVE ALONE: 90,000
sills, awnings, canopies, chimneys: May addressed: 1 space per 300 sq. ft of
extend 2’ into any required yard floor area. CARPOOL: 14,716
No parking off street in front of building.
WALK: 2,044
Unclosed fire escapes, stairways, porch
overhangs and or balconies, covered or [HEIGHT RESTRICTION] OTHER MEANS: 90,000
uncovered: May extend 4’ into any required There is no height restriction for current
yard zonning code PUBLIC TRANSIT: 900
DESIGN ANALYSIS [1]
Design Intent: One of the key issues that this site presents is the limited space for park-
ing, as well as the set backs created by the adjacent buildings. The proposed design
increases the amount of site square footage available for parking and traffic circulation,
by elevating the north and west ends of the building off of the ground. This intern, creates
a nice entrance lobby, as well as more square feet (west end) due to the 43’ setback.
possible parking
space setbacks
Building Elements : The proposed design is a 7 story, steel
framed building that provides a building footprint of only 3405 sf
compared to the actual 31085 livable sf.
Cladding: The building has a combination of light-weight steel
panels and curtain wall glass. The cladding is arranged so that
the east and west facades of the building have a less glass with
higher R values. This reduced the energy costs significantly.
Service Core: The proposed core location was based on several
factors including: centrality to the main entrance and the need for
structural support of the north wing of the building. The core’s
placement allows direct access to all levels of the the building.

Parking: By decreasing the amount of square feet used for the

buildings footprint, more parking space becomes available. For
core the 31000 sf blding, 94 parking spaces will be needed.

Building Perpective with Available Parking (orange)

footprint
property lines
Energy Analysis Summary: The
intial energy cost of a 15 year
period will be $498 k. The cost
Building Program can be seen in the bar graph by
month. The summer months
require alot of cooling costs and
during the winter months an
average heating cost. The cost of
energy went down when I
removed the glass curtain walls
on the east and west side, but I
decided that this was not a
feasible answer to reducing the
overall cost.

Monthly Energy Consumption:

office space
Between May and September
retail/restaurant are the greatest amount of
live/work space cooling costs. This could be
structural support reduced with less area on the
Interior Perpective Showing Floor Levels and Service Core lobby east and west facing facades.
from core
loading dock/waste During the winter months, Oct
main entrance traffic through Feb, the heating costs
ground floor office are much larger than the overall
mail room cooling costs. This could be
cause by the elevated wings of
the proposed building.
traffic circulation
Annual Energy Consumption: As
core seen in the graphs, the majority
of the cost come from space
cooling, area lighting, ventilation
fans, space heating and water
heating. I was able to have these
loading dock/waste adjacent buildings numbers increase and decrease
according to how much glass
cladding I applied to the facades
and how much surface area was
exposed to the east and west
Building in Plan View Showing the Loading Dock and Traffic Circulation directions.
DESIGN ANALYSIS [2]
Building Elements: The proposed design is a 10 story concrete framed
building. The footprintof the building is 4025 sf. The total livable space
is 29313 sf. This is not the ideal foot print for this site.

Design Intent: One of the major issues of this project is the large space needed on an Cladding: The building is composed of stone and glass. The cladding
extremely small site. In this design proposal, I tried to tackle this problem by going vertical. is arranged so that the east and west facades have a minimul amount
I also wanted to place a garden/patio area 5 floors up to create a unique restuarant environ- of glass. This is the orientation that created the most efficient building.
ment for this area. There is also a relatively large area left for parking spaces and landscap-
ing. Service Core: In this building there is two service cores for conve-
nience and speed of circulation throughout the building. The place-
ment also helps block some of the intense west sun light.

Parking: Due to the footprint of the building this is not the best choice
of the three for parking

Energy Analysis Summary:

The initial energy cost of a 15 year
period will be $499K which is not the
best of the three, but relatively close.
The more tinted the windows were
the better. The position of the north-
ern shaft core helps lower the cost as
well.

Energy Analysis Monthly Summary:

Building Perspective Site Circulation Because of the relatively equal
amount of hot and cold weather in
Lubbock, the placement of galzing
through out the building had little
effect on the energy costs.

Energy Analysis Annual Summary:

The moajority of the energy goes to
cooling. The second greatest cost is
lighting. These numbers varied
based on the location and orientation
Main Entrance
of the glazing on the building.
CORE

C
O
R
E

Building Cores
DESIGN ANALYSIS [3] Building Elements: This proposed design is a 11, story steel frame building, with a
concentration on the amount of green space created. The shifting of the floor slabs
creates outdoor space to help minimize the carbon footprint created by the building.
Design Intent: One of our main group concerns for our site was parking. This design is an attempt to minimize Cladding: The main cladding of the building consists of light weight recycled aluminium
the building footprint and allow for some on site parking. Another concern with the site is the lack of green space panels and a curtain wall system who's glass has a high r value. The arrangement of the
in downtown Lubbock. Through this design, we tried to reduce the buildings carbon footprint and add some cladding is to defer away from the “typical” Lubbock building which a block and grid system.
sustainable features to the building. Service Core: The core is located in the far south east corner of the building. The location
allows for security to and from the core and service entrances away from the general public.
The core does not become the main structural element of the building, where as the column
grid is the focus.
Adjacent Buildings
Parking: There will be a required amount of 91 parking spaces. The concentration
On open space will allow for more parking on the ground level. If needed, parking
Building Footprint Will be accessible underground, connecting to the core.
Energy Analysis Summary:
Core The energy cost of a 15 year period will be
$432,000. This cost is reflected in the bar
graph to the right. The months of June, July,
and August will require mazimum cooling
costs and during the cooler moths the building
will require an average hearting cost. The cost
of the required energy reduced when I
Possible Parking removed the amount of curtain walls or
covered glass with a perforated panel system.
The initial savings by implementing these
changes did not produce enough savings for
the bulding through energy cost or building
supplies to make the changes feasible.
Building Perspective

Core
Green Space
Office Space
Restaurant Monthly Energy Consumption:
Lobby Since weather is extreme in both the winter
and summer months in Lubbock, the costs
results are much higher. One way to cut cost
to the owener is to install some sustainable
features like solar panels or using new tech-
nolgy to capture wind energy. Another option
for the building owner is to make sure all
mechanical equipment is Energy Star rated.

Interior breakdown

Traffic Flow
Adjacent Building

Annual Energy Consumption:

Core
Represented by the pie charts, we can see the
Service Entrance
most demanding costs are space cooling and
water heating. I was unable to alter the
amount demanded by these two building
Public Traffic Flow
requirements enough to alter the make p of
the building. The obvious answer to the space
N cooling dilema would be to line the amont of
curtain walls on the facade
Adjacent Building
Site Plan
GROUND FLOOR N

[main entrance]

05

[lobby area]

[reception desk]
07

06

18

17

16

15

14

13

12

10
11
5

9
04

02

[drive way entrance]

03

01

[piloti] [HVAC shaft] [janitor closet] [pad-transformer]

CORE N

[ADA bathroom] [plumbing shaft] [elevators]

07 12” 8’2”

06

05

07
18

17

16

15

14

13

12

10
11

7’5” 7’ 06
7
5

9
6

04

18

17

16

15

14

13

12

10
11
5

9
04

02
02

03

2’6” 2’4”
01

[telecommunication closet] [electrical shaft] [fire stair]

 LEVEL 4: RESTAURANT N LEVELS 5-10: TYPICAL OFFICE N

[handrails]

106’

[outdoor seating]

[office space]
[lobby and indoor seating]

50’ 50’

[office space]

[kitchen]

25’ 45’ 45’

SECTION Elevator
Shaft

Analysis Roof

Railing
10 Floor
-Structural System & Construction Type
In our design proposal we used a Rigid Frame steel structure with an irregular grid pattern. The Building utilizes post and beam type
construction.
The the floors are constructed of composite steel deck slabs that have no greater spans than 15 feet. The approximate depth of the
slabs is 8-12 inches. 9th Floor
Piloti be attached to individual base plates on the roof slab of the third floor.

14'-0"

1'-0"
-Estimated Size of Members
The size of the members that we used are 17” x 13” columns and 8” deep beams. We found that the 17” x 13” columns were 8th Floor
the average sized columns for a building of similar comparison. The 8” deep beams are plausible because of the relatively short

12'-0"
spans, 15’ and 12’6. Although for the drive through area a 26” deep beam was needed for the 43’ span.

-Fire Resistance Strategy Steel

1'-0"
Column
Fire Escapes: 2 located on 1st floor - The main entrance and one located by the core. Fire stairs are both smoke proof an has two hour 7th Floor

4'-1 1/2"
walls and 1 hour doors.
Fire Extinguishers - Drystand Pipes will be installed with in the fire stair to be accessed by the fire department. Each floor will be
equipped with a sprinkler system.
All structural members will be equipped with a fire rating of two hours.

4'-0"
6th Floor

3'-10 1/2"
Curtain
Wall 5th Floor

138'-11"
4th Floor
Restaurant Area

3rd Floor

8'-1 1/2"
3'-10 1/2"
25'-0"

2nd Floor

2'-2"
Steel Beam
1st Floor
STRUCTURE + MEP
Building MEP Analysis
-Zoning Design Decisions
We have uniform zoning throughout the whole building except for the second and third floors because of the side piloti building. Those
two floors though are zoned the same.

-Heating and Cooling Systems

In this design we are using a VAV heating and cooling system. We chose this because it allows a high degree of local temperature
control at a moderate cost. It is economical to operate and virtualually self-balancing. It is also the most versitile and widely used system
in large buildings.

-Configuration and Size of Major Equipment Spaces

We have 2250 sq.ft of major equipment space located in the basement of the building.

-Size of Members and Components

The size of the ductwork members is 1’ x 1’. The size of the VAV control box is 18 inches because the square footage of each floor is
larger than 1500 sq.ft.
ENVELOPE SYSTEM

Electrical Conduit

Supply Duct Curtain Wall

Return Duct Steel Column

Reinforced
Concrete Slab

Elevator
Shaft
Gypson
Drop-Down Ceiling

Steel Beam
Bathrooms
ECOTECT ANALYSIS ArchiCAD Educational version, not for resale. Courtesy of Graphisoft.

Energy Balance Evaluation

Key Values

Project Name: Calculated heat transfer coefficients:

Project Location: Lubbock U values [Btu/sq ft,F,hr]
Activity Type: Multiple Building shell average: 0.47
Evaluation Date: 12/2/2010 5:59 AM Roofs: 0.76 - 0.76
External walls: 0.50 - 1.07
Tempered floor area: 18208.73 sq ft Basement walls: 0.79 - 0.79
Ventilated volume: 199538.53 cu ft Openings: 0.23 - 0.23
Outer heat capacity: - Btu/sq ft,F

Energy Consumption

Yearly total Yearly specific

Source kBtu/year USD/year kBtu/sq ft,year USD/sq ft,year

7.6% Natural gas 91818 0 5.04 0.00
92.4% Electricity 1123662 0 61.73 0.00

Total: 1215480 0 66.78 0.00 1215480 kBtu

66.78 kBtu/sq ft

Carbon Footprint

CO2 emission as a result of operating this building is 104 tons CO2/year

This amount of CO2 is absorbed in one year by 1.2 acres

(roughly equivalent to 0.9 football fields) of tropical forest. 104

Monthly Energy Balance

Emitted energy per Month

589232.7 Mechanical cooling

Hot water
400000
300000 Mechanical ventilation
200000 Infiltration
100000
Transmission
0
[kBtu] Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
0
Solar gain
100000
200000 Green energy
300000 Human heat gain
400000
Electricity

Primary heat source

Supplied energy per Month Primary hot water source
TEAM SHAMAYOYONESEE

[chad bunnell] [samantha peters] [ryan herr]