Site
Danielle Lerma
Standard 360
Atlas Standard 360 Survey
2010/12/07
Individual report
Company Site
Survey Standard 360
Atlas standard 360 survey
Completed questionnaires 50
Date 2010/12/07
Skill overview
Individual values
A summary of skills
Details
Answer distribution in %
Neither
Weighted Strongly agree nor Strongly
Parameter average agree Agree disagree Disagree disagree Total
Stress 3.5 17 23 57 3 0 35
management
Communication 4.0 20 57 23 0 0 40
Decision-making 3.3 3 23 75 0 0 40
Leadership 3.4 13 22 60 5 0 55
Social and 4.2 40 44 15 2 0 55
networking
Teamwork 3.8 33 25 35 7 0 55
Skills by role
Shows how each respondent role has evaluated the skill
Stress management
xx prioritizes assigned tasks under stress
xx maintains a positive outlook at work
xx reacts constructively to criticism
xx uses his/her emotions constructively in difficult situations
xx works productively in stressful environments
xx maintains his/her focus in stressed situations
xx is good at spotting new opportunities
Individual values
Definition
Can work constructively and fluidly in stressful or unpredictable situations without losing
focus or direction.
Interpretation
A high score usually indicates that the leader is capable of leading his/her employees
through crises without stressing them unnecessarily.
C+
Good
Score: 3.5
Communication
xx compromises when necessary
xx expresses respect for the opinions and views of others
xx brings clarity to communication when something is unclear
xx makes presentations with confidence and gets his/her message across clearly
xx expresses his/her opinions clearly
xx listens to others to gain understanding
xx clearly expresses his/her requirements and expectations of me
xx is open and honest in his/her communication
Individual values
Definition
Promotes dialog and understanding through communication.
Interpretation
A high score usually indicates that the leader encourages an open and safe work
environment where knowledge-sharing and synergy thrive.
B
Very good
Score: 4.0
Decision-making
xx allocates resources optimally
xx is willing to modify his/her own decisions when appropriate
xx respects the decisions of others
xx considers alternative options
xx makes necessary decisions, even if they are unpopular
xx consults with relevant parties before making major decisions
xx clearly communicates his/her decisions to relevant parties
xx ensures that decisions are being executed
Individual values
Definition
Ability to make clear decisions based on a solid foundation and implement these
decisions.
Interpretation
A high score usually indicates that employees rarely find themselves unsure about what is
expected of them, and thus find it easier to perform their tasks.
C
Good
Score: 3.3
Leadership
xx provides me with opportunities for growth and development
xx motivates me if I have an uninteresting task
xx provides me with tasks suitable to my professional level and experience
xx tells me if the quality of my work is unsatisfactory
xx continuously ensures that I know my goals
xx delegates tasks to the appropriate resources
xx allocates resources optimally
xx provides me with tasks, I find challenging
xx creates a motivating environment for goal-achievement
xx recruits talented employees
xx expresses his/her recognition when I do my work well
Individual values
Definition
Can guide, distribute work, and offer employees the opportunity to perform optimally.
Interpretation
A high score usually leads to enterprising, independent and high-performing employees.
C+
Good
Score: 3.4
Definition
Can obtain support/collaborative companionship through binding relationships and
networks.
Interpretation
A high score indicates that the manager can easily create essential conditions to ensure
flow and quality in work execution.
A-
Excellent
Score: 4.2
Teamwork
xx gets along well with most people
xx engages me in dialogue
xx is helpful
xx promotes new ways of collaboration through his/her network
xx supports others on the team
xx is credible
xx respects and maintains deadlines, and other agreements
xx listens to others to gain understanding
xx expresses respect for the opinions and views of others
xx understands and respects the role of other players on the team
xx knows and respects his/her role in team-based situations
xx brings valuable knowledge and skills to the team
Individual values
Definition
Can motivate employees/ team to achieve synergy through collaboration.
Interpretation
A high score usually indicates that the leader is able to create a stimulating work
environment for high-performing employees.
B-
Very good
Score: 3.8
Open-response questions
Individual values
Text-based answers to open questions. The answers have been given with a promise of
anonymity and it is not possible to see who have given the answer.
Benchmark comparison
Individual values
Question breakdown
Shows all numeric questions.
Individual values
Line
# Question Self Manager Su
34 xx consults with relevant parties before making major decisions 4.0 4.0 3.
35 xx continuously ensures that I know my goals 4.0 3.0 3.
36 xx tells me if the quality of my work is unsatisfactory 4.0 3.0 3.
37 xx expresses his/her recognition when I do my work well 3.0 4.0 2.
40 xx is helpful 3.0 5.0 3.
44 xx clearly expresses his/her requirements and expectations of me 3.0 4.0 4.
45 xx compromises when necessary 3.0 4.0 4.
46 xx brings clarity to communication when something is unclear 3.0 4.0 4.
47 xx is open and honest in his/her communication 3.0 4.0 4.
48 xx clearly communicates his/her decisions to relevant parties 3.0 4.0 3.
49 xx ensures that decisions are being executed 3.0 4.0 3.
50 xx openly and honestly offers knowledge and skills to help others 2.0 5.0 4.
51 xx asks for help when it is needed 3.0 5.0 4.
52 xx is able to negotiate acceptable solutions for all parties involved 3.0 5.0 4.
53 xx respects and maintains deadlines, and other agreements 3.0 5.0 4.
54 xx is credible 3.0 5.0 3.
55 xx brings valuable knowledge and skills to the team 3.0 5.0 2.
Scale Description Values
Agree 1-5 5-point classic Likert scale 5.0: Strongly agree
Continuous 4.0: Agree
3.0: Neither agree nor disagree
2.0: Disagree
1.0: Strongly disagree