Based on the way policy makers behave, this charge proved to be too narrow
a focus. While it is certainly true that data on behavior derived from properly
designed social experiments are more believable and do allow unambiguous
assertions of cause and effect, it requires more than random assignment to a
treatment and control group to make experimental data usable and reliable.
Background
Indonesia was once known as one of the Asian Tiger1 in economic field before
approximately $ 1,000 and between 1965 and 1990 the economic growth
average was 5.5%. Unfortunately, because the planning in the new order was
based on the economic growth that was influenced by Trickle Down Effect
on capital and loan from abroad that when the capital was withdrawn, we
were closed down while the others were transferred abroad. These
Base on World Bank report (2006), there are five factors that can be
situations.
1 Asian Tigers are called to the eight best performers -- Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan, Korea, China,
Malaysia, Thailand, and Indonesia -- grew at an average of over 5.5% per year in per capita terms
between 1965 and 1990. See Steven Radelet, Jeffrey Sachs, and Jong-Wha Lee.1997.”Paper :Economic
Growth in Asia”. http://www.cid.harvard.edu/hiid/609.pdf
reach higher education. It relates with the high cost of education itself.
buying things such as for books and uniforms still remain high. Another cost
that should be calculated when poor people let their children study at school
is opportunity cost if their children study in private school. The high cost of
education has made school only for particular people, regardless to the basic
Correlation between poverty and education level can be seen from the
high and later to senior high school relatively small in poorest group. 70.5
percent of them complete their study from junior high school and only 18.2
percent who can complete their education in senior high school. On the
contrary, among the richest group, 90.7 percent completed their education
in junior high school and 40 percent completed senior high school. From the
data shown it can be concluded that the better economic condition one lives
Types of Jobs; Poverty has also been connected with types of job. In
Indonesia, poverty is always attached with farming sector in rural area and
informal sector in urban area. In 2004, 68,7 percent of 36,10 millions of poor
people living in rural area and 60 percent of them worked in farming sector2.
2 Tahlim Sudaryanto and I Wayan Rusastra, “Strategies for Increasing Production and
Alleviating Poverty in Agriculture”, in Journal Litbang Pertanian,, 25(4),2006. P. 1
of 1984 until 2002, farming sector, whether in rural or urban area, is the
main cause of poverty. Moreover, the study also pointed out that farming
sector has contributed more than 50 percent of the total poverty number
and this is very contradictive when compared with service and idustry
sectors. The high level of poverty in farming sector has consequently caused
poverty rate increase to those who work as farmers than to those who work
in other sectors.
informal workers. Women acquire more unfavorable positions than men (ILO
(MDGs Report, 2005). The fact that HDI was higher than the two gender
low level of participation and opportunity for women in politic, economy, and
decision making processes. This MDGs report also points out that in GDI
system will directly and indirectly improve the poor people’s income through
improvement in villages are not good. This study also stated that
for two factors; Firstly, natural condition in which there is potency in soil
thos which has relationship with rural and urban development, or inter-
in Java. According to a data in 2004, people who live in Papua tend to have
poor probability four times bigger than those who live in rich natural
the factor of poverty. Today, government has the most popular program that
poverty alleviation.
Poverty Program (UPP). The question that we propose: “what are the process
reflecting the people needs, problem, and involving the stake holder?
CHAPTER II
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1. Policy
In public policy process, there are five steps and in each steps there
are some key question that must be answered to understand what the
policy into effect? What impact does this have on policy content?
Meanwhile, Lester and Steward explained there are six stages of policy
process, as follows:
1. Agenda setting
institutional agendas.
2. Policy Formulation
5 Ibid, p.24
behavior.
3. Policy Implementation
It has been described as what happens after a bill becomes law. Simply
law into effect or that the problem will be solved. Law must be translated
can see to it that the intent of the legislation is achieved at the point
4. Policy Evaluation
with the actual impacts of legislation or the extent to which with the
5. Policy Change
begins anew.
6. Policy Termination
Essentially, policy termination is the end point of the policy cycle. It can
problem. According to Deborah Stone, there are five types of policy solution:
(1). Inducement, which can be positive (ex, tax credits) or negative (ex,
penalties for pollution); (2). Rules, or other forms of mandated behavior such
to-know information; (4). Rights, which give certain people rights or duties,
body is charged with specific powers to improve decision making, such as the
In the policy formulation, many actors are involved. Lester and Stewart 8
a. Governmental Agencies
b. The Presidency
The president and/or executive offices are often involved in the policy
c. Congress
d. Interest Groups
7 Ibid p. 87
8 Ibid. p. 88-90
In USA, and followed by many countries, there are three models in analyzing
a. Rational-Comprehensive Model
following component:
1). The decision maker is confronted with a given problem that can be
2). The goals, values, or objectives that guide decision maker are clarified
3). A complete set of alternative policies for dealing with the problem are
prepared;
9 Ibid, p. 89-96.
1). The selection of goals or objectives and the empirical analysis of the
action needed to attain them are closely intertwined with, rather than
2). The decision maker considers only some of the for dealing with a
are evaluated;
This model propose that inputs (demands and supports) are converted by
the process of the political system (legislatures, the courts, etc) into
for the system and for environment in which the system exist. Demands
demography). Support includes action that help the system operate and
help to sustain it. Support is derived from: the political community, the
and welfare.
opportunity and secure the continuity of many results already attained. The
goals to attain in the program are: First, to increase the poor’s welfare and
providing service to the community, especially for the poor, through pro‐poor
empowerment.
local level. In this context, the program always gives priority to the universal
The scope of KDP and UPP are basically open for all poverty prevention
labor intensive basis and provision of financing source through funding and
paid to the female group to utilize the revolving funds as well as other
of this activity covers the efforts to increase the community’s and local
of good governance.
condition as well as positive synergy for the community (especially the poor
the activities to support government and many other care groups in the
In international and global context, KDP and UPP are also directed to support
Nations; where 147 countries were represented directly by the State Head or
protection to the weak groups, human right and governance that was then
The seven of first range of MGDs above have been translated into
outlined in MDG not only merely serve as goal that must be attained by the
central government of each country, but also must serve as the development
The long-term vision developed in KDP and UPP, are to attain the poor
environment and finally manage all resources to settle the existing poverty
problems.
Mission of KDP and UPP, in time‐phase of 5 (five) to 6 (six) years to come, are
institutions therein.
outlined by KDP and UPP areas within certain time limit from period of 5 ‐ 6
gradually within such period. This Mission can be viewed and re‐evaluated
The general objective of KDP and UPP are to increase the welfare and job
opportunity for the poor in the rural areas through the enforcement of
management.
Program/Project Implementation
other matters relating to the KDP and UPP as well as to determine the
agreements between villages in how to carry out the KDP and UPP.
(Dusun/RW) to find the ideas fit the needs of the community, especially Poor
Households. The ideas presented by the community not just the idea of the
proposed activities in order to obtain funds KDP and UPP, but such ideas in
discuss the ideas of women's groups and set the proposed activities that are
to discuss the whole idea of projects, results of the probing process ideas
among groups.
feasibility of the project proposal of each village to be funded KDP and UPP.
discuss and rank the project proposals. Ranking is based on eligibility criteria
proposals to be funded through the KDP and UPP. Funding decisions should
be based on the ranking of proposals being made at the time of MAD Priority.
each step. The steps in the process, commonly, are: defining the problem,
economic policy in New Order in facing global financial crisis in 1998 was
regardless to the power and potency of local economy. If we trace back to the
past, the new order policy tend to use Elitist model in which public policy was
other words, the formulation of public policy utilizing elitist model can be
government was favorably relied on foreign capital and loan that when the
global financial crisis came, Indonesia cannot do anything because the capital
10 Ibid. p.54
significantly beyond U.S. $ 1,000 until $ 250. It led Indonesia as poor country
Indonesia into crises can be identified resembling from global financial crisis,
Agenda setting
unemployment and poverty became two big issues surround the elite level of
Indonesian government. Lester and Stewart said that an issue will receive
attention from public policy makers if (1) it has reached crisis proportions
and can no longer be ignored, (2) it has achieved particularity, in which the
it has wide impact, (5) it raises questions about power and legitimacy, (6) it
is fashionable14.
bomb that could topple the government which ends up like de javu (as new
order experience).
Alternative Choices
In this stage, government needs to consider many policies that can also
Cash Subsidy;
In the end, from many programs alternative, KDP and UPP are seen as the
appropriate ones. We know that KDP began in 1998 meanwhile UPP began in
5.1. Conclusion
KDP and UPP as a policy of poverty alleviation has been trying to implement
the pluralist models involves four main components in making policy, that is:
best choice. We argue that those programs are the best among the other
The steps are: search the subject problem; setting goals, values, or
In the context of balance of interest, those programs give benefit to all of the
income of the poor people, although the increasing does not significant.
interest groups also get a benefit from the projects particularly in the building
benefit, though they can really leave the poverty trapped. In the condition of
poverty, poor people will very happy to receive any number of money and
assistance. They will not care on the motive behind the assistance.
5.2. Recommendation
As the program that needs a lot of money, the government should be careful
have a long-terms result and actually be able to alleviate poor people from
poverty mud.
poverty alleviation, the government (and also all of actors) needs to consider
the factors that cause poverty. Base on World Bank report (2006), there are
five factors that can be considered as having relations with poverty. These
03/19/ekbis3.htm