page 1
CONTENTS
D. Environmental impacts
E. Stakeholders’ comments
Annexes
page 2
The purpose of project activity is to replace fossil fuel being used in reheating furnace (RHF), Continuous
hot dip Galvanising Line (CGL) furnaces and Coiler furnace at Lloyds Steel Industries Limited (LSIL) by
waste coke oven gas. The details on waste coke oven gas provided in this section.
The Coke Oven Gas is sourced from joint facility of Uttam Galva Metallics Limited (UGML) and LSIL.
UGML is being put up with sole intention to supply LSIL their entire finished product Pig Iron. LSIL will
use the pig iron for manufacturing of their product steel. UGML is within the same industrial facility
adjoining to LSIL manufacturing area and creating joint facility as they use common utilities like water,
Nitrogen, Oxygen etc.
The agreement between UGML and LSIL for creating joint facility where in the entire product of UGML
is supplied to LSIL and having common utilities including use of coke oven gas by LSIL will be made
available to DOE during validation process.
LSIL is a steel manufacturing company equipped with DR-EAF-Continuous slab caster based steel
plant of capacity about 600000 tonnes/year of steel. The fossil fuels are presently being fired in the
following furnaces.
(a.1) The Reheating Furnace for heating of ladle, turn dish etc uses Furnace oil for firing.
The project activity is to replace the fossil fuel being presently used with waste coke oven gas.
page 3
(b.1) LSIL proposes to replace this Reheating furnace (RHF) of capacity of 150 tonnes/hr which uses
furnace oil as fuel with new Reheating furnace of capacity 300 tonnes/hr which can use Coke Oven Gas
as fuel. The proposed new facility will result in increased plant of capacity of 1000000 tonnes/year of
steel.
(b.2) Continuous hot dip galvanising (CGL) and coiler furnaces which presently use LPG as fuel will
be modified to use coke oven gas instead of LPG. The modification will involve changing burners and
control system including piping of coke oven gas.
LSIL proposes to use only waste coke oven gas in the furnaces thus replacing the furnace oil/LPG
consumption.
The waste coke oven gas will be sourced from UGML who are putting 450 m3 blast furnace to produce
472000 tonnes/month of hot metal and 200000 tonnes/month of metallurgical coke. The coke oven gas is
obtained as by product during manufacturing of metallurgical coke which is used in blast furnace for
making hot metal.
UGML do not have any use for excess coke oven gas after using the coke oven gas in the blast furnace
and would be letting out into atmosphere after burning.
LSIL has entered into agreement with UGML to create the joint facility where LSIL will source the
entire finished product Pig Iron of UGML and common utilities are being used. LSIL will use the waste
coke oven gas which has the following composition and calorific value as delivered to LSIL at receiving
point by UGML. The agreement will be made available to DOE during validation.
This coke oven gas is fired instead of furnace oil in reheating furnace and coke oven gas will be fired
instead of LPG in Coiler furnace and CGL furnaces.
1 New reheating furnace capable of using coke oven gas for firing.
2 Modification of Coiler furnace for using coke oven gas instead of LPG.
3 Modification of CGL furnaces for using coke oven gas instead of LPG.
4 Pipe line to carry gas from gas holder to utility points of approximate length of 3 km.
1 The new reheating furnace capable of using coke oven gas is received and being installed.
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 4
2 Piping work from UGML to LSIL utility points will be completed by March 2010.
3 Commissioning expected by April-June 2010 after the continuous availability of coke oven gas.
The baseline is the same scenario existing prior to the start of implementation of project activity.
The base line is fossil fuel i.e. Furnace oil for RHF and LPG for Coiler/CGL furnaces are being fired in
pre project scenario and the same scenario of using fossil fuel for firing in furnaces would have been
continued in the absence of project activity.
The project activity reduces CO2 emissions from replacement of fossil fuels used in the furnaces by waste
coke oven gas which would have been otherwise flared by UGML before letting into atmosphere in the
absence of the project activity and in the project activity LSIL uses this waste coke oven gas in their
furnaces to provide required heat which would have been otherwise provided by firing fossil fuels like
furnace oil in reheating furnace and LPG in coiler and CGL furnaces. CO2 emission due to burning of
fossil fuel is avoided and thus achieves reduction in CO2 emissions.
In B.3 section it is explained that CO2 emissions due to base line fossil fuel are mainly considered and
CH4 and N2O are not considered to be on conservative side in calculating baseline emissions. In A.4.3
It is also explained that the Furnace oil for RHF and LPG for Coiler/CGL furnaces are being fired in pre
project scenario and the same are being replaced by WECM coke oven gas.
.
The total CO2 emission reduction for the entire crediting period of 10 years has been calculated as
1170800 tonne CO2 equivalent.
(3)The project activity will lead to sustainable development and promote sustainable Industrial growth by
conserving natural resources and preventing the thermal pollution even though no such statutory
requirement exists.
Social benefit to state
The project activity increases the employment within LSIL for skilled manpower and Professionals.
Skilled and unskilled labour will gain temporary employment while executing the project.
India is very deficient in crude oil and major portion of its oil requirements are met by imports. Hence
saving in the use of fossil fuel like furnace oil and LPG enables the scarce petroleum products to be made
available to the society for some other uses.
Economical Benefits to State
The project involves investment of around 600 million rupees and will involve more than 400 million
rupees capital equipment purchase. Engineering industry will benefit and provide employment
opportunity for professionals, skilled and unskilled people.
The state will generate revenue out of the manufacturing activities supported by the energy generation
and due to purchase of equipment for execution of project by way of Sales Tax; Excise Duty; Entry Tax
etc.
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 5
India is facing shortage of oil leading to import of major requirement of its oil needs which consumes
valuable foreign exchange leading to petroleum products starvation and hence the project activity enables
the country to bridge this gap by reduction in demand on petroleum products by company and save
valuable foreign exchange.
Environmental Benefit
The Project activity is waste heat recovery based Project by utilizing waste heat from coke oven gases
coming from process and thus effectively saving environment of thermal pollution. In the absence of
project activity coke oven gases would have been flared by UGML leading to thermal pollution. The
project activity displaces heat from fossil fuel and hence reduces CO2 emission
The project activity located at Lloyds Steel Industries Limited, Bhugano, Wardha Taluka & District,
Maharashtra. Latitude 200 42’ 4.45”, Longitude 780 37’ 15.24”. Nearest Railway station is Bhugano.
page 6
The CDM PDD is based on approved methodology ACM0012 version 03.2 and Sectoral scope; 01 & 04
EB 51 “Consolidated baseline methodology for GHG emission reductions from waste energy recovery
projects”
A.4.3. Technology to be employed by the project activity:
1) Description of how the project is environmentally safe and sound technology, and know how transfer.
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 7
The Reheating Furnace is being imported from Jiangsu Sky run Corporation China which is of proven
technology and all the technical details for operation of the equipment safely are provided by Jiangsu Sky
run Corporation. The modifications for Continuous hot dip galvanising line (CGL) furnaces and Coiler
furnace are being carried out by LSIL with new burners from indigenous suppliers. The technology is
proven. The installation is under CCOE and hence all approvals will be got from CCOE which ensures
that the installation is safe and of sound technology.
The purpose of project activity is to replace fossil fuel being used in reheating furnace (RHF),
Continuous hot dip Galvanising Line (CGL) furnaces and Coiler furnace at Lloyds Steel Industries
Limited (LSIL) by waste coke oven gas.
LSIL proposes to use only waste coke oven gas in the furnaces thus replacing the furnace oil/LPG
consumption.
The waste coke oven gas will be sourced from UGML who are putting 450 m3 blast furnace to produce
472000 tonnes/month of hot metal and 200000 tonnes/month of metallurgical coke. The coke oven gas is
obtained as by product during manufacturing of metallurgical coke which is used in blast furnace for
making hot metal.
UGML do not have any use for excess coke oven gas after using the coke oven gas in the plant and
would be letting out into atmosphere after flaring.
LSIL has entered into agreement with UGML to create the joint facility where LSIL will source the
entire finished product Pig Iron of UGML and common utilities are being used. LSIL will use the waste
coke oven gas which has the following composition and calorific value as delivered to LSIL at receiving
point by UGML. The agreement will be made available to DOE during validation.
This coke oven gas is fired instead of furnace oil in reheating furnace and coke oven gas will be fired
instead of LPG in Coiler furnace and CGL furnaces.
(a.1) The Reheating Furnace (RHF) for heating of ladle, turn dish etc uses Furnace oil for firing.
Capacity: 600000 tonnes/year
Make: MDH
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 8
(b.1) LSIL proposes to replace this Reheating furnace (RHF) of capacity of 150 tonnes/hr with new
Reheating furnace of capacity of 300 tonnes/hr which can use both Furnace oil/Coke Oven Gas. The
proposed facility will result in increased plant of capacity of 100000 tonnes/year of steel from present
600000 tonnes/year.
(b.2) Existing Continuous hot dip galvanising (CGL) and coiler furnaces will be modified to use coke
oven gas instead of LPG. The capacity of each furnace remains unchanged.
The Coke Oven gas which is a by product during manufacturing of metallurgical coke from coal which is
used in blast furnace to produce pig iron and excess coke oven gas after the use in coke ovens is a waste
gas which has to be let out to atmosphere and the waste coke oven gas has the following composition and
flow rate as delivered to receiving point of LSIL by UGML
UGML does not have any use for this excess coke oven gas in their process after their requirements are
met in coke oven batteries and have to let out into atmosphere after burning in the absence of project
activity.
Main equipment
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 9
1 The pipe line from this gas tank to utility points of approximately 3 km.
3 Coiler furnace and CGL furnaces modification in burner system to make them suitable for coke oven
gas firing. Make of burners is M/S Continental Thermal Engineers, Chennai, India.
Coiler furnace:
Capacity: 400000 tonnes/year
Fuel used: Coke Oven Gas
Specific Fuel consumption: 1210 MJ/tonne based on 3 year average
Fuel Consumption: 500 Nm3/hr of coke oven gas.
CGL furnaces
Capacity: 250000 tonnes/year
Fuel used: Coke Oven Gas
Fuel Consumption: 2550 Nm3/hr of coke oven gas.
The baseline is the same scenario existing prior to the start of implementation of project activity.
The base line is fossil fuel i.e. Furnace oil for RHF and LPG for Coiler/CGL are being been fired in pre
project scenario and the same scenario of using fossil fuel for firing in furnaces would have been
continued in the absence of project activity as it is business as usual scenario.
LSIL is a steel manufacturing company equipped with DR-EAF-Continuous slab caster based steel plant
of capacity about 600000 tonnes/year of steel. The fossil fuels are presently being fired in the following
furnaces.
1 The Reheating Furnace (RHF) for heating of ladle, turn dish etc uses Furnace oil for firing.
Capacity: 600000 tonnes/year
2 Continuous hot dip galvanising line (CGL) furnaces fuel used is LPG. Capacity 250000 tonnes/year
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 10
Normal life of steel mill equipment is 30 years as observed in industry. Reheating furnace is new. CGL
furnace and coiler furnace are approximately 16 years in operation. Expected balance life for these
furnaces is about 14 years.
The project activity reduces CO2 emissions from replacement of fossil fuels used in the furnaces by
Waste coke oven gas would have been otherwise flared by UGML before letting into atmosphere in the
absence of the project activity and in the project activity LSIL uses this waste coke oven gas in their
furnaces to provide required heat which would have been otherwise provided by firing fossil fuels like
furnace oil in reheating furnace and LPG in coiler and CGL furnaces. CO2 emission due to burning of
fossil fuel is avoided and thus achieves reduction in CO2 emissions.
The Coke Oven gas which is a by product during manufacturing of metallurgical coke from coal which is
used in blast furnace to produce pig iron and excess coke oven gas after the use in coke ovens is a waste
gas which has to be let out to atmosphere and the waste coke oven gas has the following composition and
flow rate as delivered to receiving point of LSIL by UGML
UGML does not have any use for this excess coke oven gas in their process after their requirements are
met in coke oven batteries and have to let out into atmosphere after burning in the absence of project
activity.
Heat from coke oven gas: 12250 x 4000 x 4.18 = 2.0482 x 10 8 kilojoules/hr
Heat produced by coke oven gas /year = 17942.2 x 10 8 kilojoules/year.
page 11
A.4.4. Estimated amount of emission reductions over the chosen crediting period:
Years Annual estimation of emission
reductions in tonnes of CO2eq
2010 117028
2011 117028
2012 117028
2013 117028
2014 117028
2015 117028
2016 117028
2017 117028
2018 117028
2019 117028
Total estimated reductions
1170280
(tonnes CO2 e)
Total number of crediting years 10
Annual average over the 117028
crediting period of estimated
reductions ( tonnes CO2 e)
A.4.5. Public funding of the project activity:
>> No public funding from parties included in Annex-I is available for the project activity. No ODA
funds are used in project activity.
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 12
B.1. Title and reference of the approved baseline and monitoring methodology applied to the
project activity:
>>
Title of approved methodology: “Consolidated baseline methodology for GHG emission reduction from
energy recovery projects”
Methodology No &Version : ACM 0012, Version 03.2, Sectoral Scope: 1&4 EB 51.
B.2. Justification of the choice of the methodology and why it is applicable to the project
activity:
>>
The methodology sets out two types of project activity.
Type 1 All the waste energy in identified WECM stream, that will be utilized in the project activity, is, or
would be flared or released to atmosphere in the absence of project activity at the existing or new facility.
The waste energy is an energy source for
. Cogeneration or
. Generation of electricity or
.For generation of heat in element process (e.g. steam, hot water, hot oil, hot air) or
The project activity is for direct use as process heat source in furnaces and hence falls in type1 category
direct use as process heat source. The identified WECM is excess waste coke oven gas.
Applicable conditions of Methodology How the project activity meets the conditions
If project activity is based on use of waste pressure Not applicable as project activity is for direct use as
to generate electricity, electricity generated using process heat source.
waste gas pressure should be measurable
Energy generated in the project activity may be The project activity generates heat for use in
used within the industrial facility or exported furnaces from WECM and the generated heat is
outside the industrial facility used within the industrial facility. UGML has no
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 13
In case the energy is exported to other facilities an Not applicable as process heat generated will be
agreement is signed by the energy generation plant used for captive consumption only.
with recipient plants that emission reductions
would not be claimed by recipient plants for using
a zero emission source
For those facilities and recipients included in the LSIL is replacing the present RHF with new RHF
project boundary, which prior to the with increased capacity and hence can be treated as
implementation of project activity generated energy new facility.
on site, the credits can be claimed for a minimum Normal life of steel mill equipment is 30 years as
of the following periods observed in industry. CGL furnace and coiler
. The remaining life time of equipments currently furnace are approximately 16 years in operation.
being used. Expected balance life for these furnaces is about 14
. Credit period years.
page 14
The waste energy utilized in project activity was Coke oven Gas used in project activity is surplus
flared or released into the atmosphere in the after providing for internal use of UGML. UGML
absence of project activity. This shall be proven by has no further use in the process and would have
either one of the following flared through chimney in the absence of the
1 By direct measurements of energy content project activity. The same can be proven from site
2 Energy balance checks by DOE.
3 Energy bills
4 Process plant manufacturer’s original
specifications
5 On site checks by DOE
The project activity meets the applicability conditions set out in approved methodology
1. The base line calculations for CO2 emission reduction are in line with approved methodology and
are calculated using CEA data provided in CO2 data base Version 5.0 November 2009 available in CEA
web site www.cea.nic.in.
2. By successful operation of project activity, the project activity will be able to displace/ substitute
electricity of grid with an emission reduction of 117028 tCO2/annum (Ref. Section- B 6.3).
3. The project activity adds no additional GHG emission.
Hence it is concluded that the project activity meets the conditions set out in selected approved
methodology.
B.3. Description of the sources and gases included in the project boundary:
>>
In line with methodology, the project activity is for the recovery of waste heat from coke oven gases for
generation of process heat for direct use as heat in furnaces.
In the base line scenario, the heat would have other wise been generated by fossil fuel like furnace oil and
LPG.
In line with methodology the project boundary comprises of the RHF, CGL and Coiler Furnaces, piping
for coke oven gas
As per the approved methodology the geographical extent project boundary shall include the following:
1 The industrial facility where waste energy is generated (coke oven gas), that is, UGML
Project activity has no control over waste gas quantity and quality like flow and temperature. , Gas holder
is provided by UGML for temporary storage.
2 The facility where process heat in element process/steam/electricity are generated (generator of process
heat/steam/electricity). Equipment providing auxiliary heat to the waste heat recovery process shall be
included within the project boundary:
That is the actual project activity comprises of burning coke oven gas in furnaces where project
participant has full Control.
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 15
3 The facility/s where the process heat in element process/steam/electricity is used (the recipient plant(s)
and /or grid where electricity is exported. Not applicable as the project activity is for providing in house
requirement of direct heat to furnaces.
CGL 1 & 2
2550 m 3/hr
COILER FURNACE
500 m3/hr
RHF
9000 m3/hr
RECEIVING
POINT OF
LSIL
Table 1: Summary of gases and sources included in the project boundary, justification explanation where
gases and sources are not included.
conservative.
CO2 Excluded Not
Fossil fuel consumption in cogeneration plant
applicable.
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 16
page 17
B.4. Description of how the baseline scenario is identified and description of the identified
baseline scenario:
The baseline scenario is identified as the most plausible scenario among all realistic and credible
alternatives.
Realistic and credible alternatives should be determined for:
While determining the baseline scenario the project participant shall identify the realistic and
credible alternatives to the project activity, which would provide output equivalent to combined output of
all the sub systems in the project scenario. Therefore the alternatives should provide the same heat output
as in the project activity and should include the alternate use of the waste gas heat utilised in the project
activity.
The project participant is required to provide evidence and supporting documents to exclude
baseline options that meet the above mentioned criteria. The methodology provides 4 steps to
to determine baseline.
Step 1: Define the most possible baseline scenario for the generation of heat and electricity using
baseline options and combinations.
The baseline candidates should be considered for following facilities.
. For the industrial facility where the waste energy (coke oven gas) is generated UGML and
. For the facility where the energy is produced and consumed i.e.LSIL; and
Hence Baseline study has been carried for project proponent LSIL and UGML.
page 18
page 19
page 20
Step 2: Identify the fuel for the baseline choice of energy source taking into account the national
and/or sectoral policies as applicable
The base line is fossil fuel (Furnace oil for RHF furnace and LPG for Coiler and CGL furnaces) as the
fossil fuel being used as energy source from the inception of the manufacturing facilities. There is no
shortage of furnace oil or LPG as the same are available on demand from the refineries. The refineries use
both indigenous and imported crude oil to generate the fossil fuels.
STEP 3:
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 21
Step 2 and/or Step 3 of the latest approved version of the “ Tool for the demonstration and
assessment of additionality ’’ shall be used to identify the most plausible baseline scenarios by
eliminating non feasible options
Section B.5 covers the stepwise demonstration of additionality as per the “Tool for the demonstration
and assessment of additionality version 05.2 EB 39 ’’. We have demonstrated the additionality based on
step 3.
STEP 4: If more than one credible and plausible alternative scenario remain, the alternative with
the lowest base line emissions shall be considered as the most likely baseline scenario.
In step1 all the credible alternatives for waste gas and waste heat were considered. In the absence of
project activity UGML would have vented through chimney the excess waste coke oven gas as UGML do
not have further requirements in the process (W2) and LSIL would continue to use fossil fuel for
providing heat in their furnaces (H4).
Base line
The baseline is the same scenario existing prior to the start of implementation of project activity.
The base line is fossil fuel i.e. Furnace oil for RHF and LPG for Coiler/CGL furnaces are being been fired
in pre project scenario and the same scenario of using fossil fuel for firing in furnaces would have been
continued if waste coke oven gas is not available.
The project activity reduces CO2emissions from replacement of fossil fuels used in the furnaces by waste
coke oven gas which would have been otherwise burnt by UGML before letting into atmosphere in the
absence of the project activity and in the project activity LSIL uses this waste coke oven gas in their
furnaces to provide required heat which would have been otherwise provided by firing fossil fuels like
furnace oil in reheating furnace and LPG in coiler and CGL furnaces. CO2 emission due to burning of
fossil fuel is avoided and thus achieves reduction in GHG emissions.
B.5. Description of how the anthropogenic emissions of GHG by sources are reduced below
those that would have occurred in the absence of the registered CDM project activity (assessment
and demonstration of additionality):
It is required to describe how the anthropogenic emissions of GHG by sources are reduced below those
that would have occurred in the absence of registered CDM activity. The proposed CDM project activity
is designed to generate heat from the waste coke oven gases emitting out of an established industrial
manufacturing process i.e. coke oven complex which would have been let into atmosphere after burning
in the absence of project activity . The reduction in GHG emissions due to burning of fossil fuel is
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 22
achieved by using only the waste coke oven Gases to generate heat whereas in the absence of the
proposed project activity heat requirement would have been met by burning fossil fuel.
It is required to explain how and why the proposed project activity is additional and therefore not the
baseline scenario in accordance to the selected baseline methodology.
As per the decision 17 / CP.7 AND 18/CP.9 a CDM activity is additional, if anthropogenic emissions of
GHGs by sources are reduced below those that would have occurred in the absence of registered project
activity. The tool for the demonstrations and assessment of additionality (version 05.2) EB 39 requires the
project participant to demonstrate and assess additionality, as per the steps given below:
We have discussed realistic and credible alternatives available to project activity in B.4 and have come to
conclusion that fossil fuel is base line option as the fossil fuel is being replaced by using waste coke oven
gas as direct heat source. We hereby proceed to establish the additionality of proposed project activity
using “the tool for the demonstration and assessment of additionality” (version 05.2) EB 39.
As per the guidelines for PDD preparation it is needed to demonstrate the consideration of CDM
benefits were seriously considered if the starting date of project activity is before validation date.
LSIL board met on 25/10/2008 and discussed the feasibility of waste coke oven gas from UGML being
used instead of furnace oil in reheating furnace. The chairman informed the board about clean
development mechanism and CDM benefits will be available if company applies for this project. After
deliberations it was decided to and apply for CDM registration.
In line with requirement of CDM a letter Notification regarding CDM status dated 30/10/2008 was sent to
UNFCCC Secretariat by letter and by email to cdmregistration@unfccc.int on and acknowledgement
from UNFCCC received on 21/11/2008. A letter of notification regarding CDM status was delivered to
CDM Authority of India by hand delivery.
1 The chairman informed the board regarding the availibilty of waste coke oven gas from near by Uttam
Galva Metallics Limited (UGML) plant and proposal received from UGML for using such waste coke
oven gas reheating furnace of Lloyds Steel Industries Limited
2 He further informed the board that this waste coke oven Gas heat can be utilised to generate heat in
reheating furnace to heat the slabs instead of furnace oil for which Clean Development Mechanism
(CDM) benefits available and these benefits will make the project viable. The project will generate some
steam by more efficient use of waste heat in reheating furnace and this steam will be utilized in process
replacing coal based steam and hence will also be eligible for CDM benefits.
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 23
3 He further informed the board that to avail such CDM benefits it is desirable to apply to appropriate
authorities for CDM registration and CDM benefits would make project viable.
The tool for the demonstration and assessment of additionality version 05.2 outlines four steps to
demonstrate additionality.
Time line of activities
Time line of activities of Project Activity Time line of activities for CDM registration
Board Resolution 25/10/2008 Board resolution 25/10/2008
Agreement with Notification regarding 21/11/2009
UGML 15/01/2009 CDM project activity
to UNFCCC
Starting of pipe line 01/11/2009 Appointment of DOE 12/01/2009
laying work for validation
Expected receipt of 25/12/2009 Submission of PDD to 10/04/2009
Reheating Furnace DOE for pre
validation check
Expected date of 28/02/2010 DOE Comments 10/06/2009
completion of piping receipt after pre
and storage tank work validation check
Installation of 25/03/2010 DOE confirmation 10/01/2009
reheating furnace that PDD can be
resubmitted
Modification of Coiler 25/03/2010 PDD resubmission 23/01/2009
and CGL furnaces To DOE for
validation
Expected date of 14/04/2010 to
commissioning 15/6/2010.
STEP 1 - Identification of the alternatives to the project activity considered with current laws
and regulations
Identify realistic and credible alternatives In section B.4 all the possible alternatives have been
Proposed activity not undertaken as CDM discussed for the alternatives recognised were:
project activity.
1 The methodology lists six realistic and credible
All other plausible and credible alternative alternatives for waste gas and the alternative to vent
continuation of current situation to atmosphere the waste coke oven gases after
flaring was the only option in the absence of project
activity for UGML.
page 24
1 Alternative shall be in compliance with All the alternatives are in compliance with current
legal and regularly requirements. legal and regulatory requirements.
Additionality tool provides the option of selecting Step 2 or Step 3. LSIL select step 3 and hence proceed
to Step 3.
STEP –3 Barrier analysis to show additionality.
Sub-Step 3.a Identification of barriers that would prevent the implementation of the type of the
project activity.
Investment
barriers
Debt funding is LSIL has incurred losses when the steel industry faced acute recession a
not available for few years back. The company has accumulated losses and is under BIFR
this type of (Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction, Government of India)
3.a.1 proposed project with debt restructuring of liabilities. Hence the company faces the financial
activity. barrier due to the non availability of fresh funds to carry out expansion
activities both from financial institutes and equity market. The company’s
finance demands go through close scrutiny of the concerned financial
institutions and have not been able to secure institutional loans for project
activity. The details of company financial are as follows
Nature of company:
Financials of company
(Rs in Millions)
2008-09 2007-08
Sales 28415.644 24773.629
Profit (loss) after tax for the year(164.8545) (46.8921)
Profit(loss) brought from previous
year (12631.012 ) ( 12162.091)
payment made as per
debt restructuring 461.4 826.7
page 25
How CDM CDM revenues will enable the company to overcome the barrier partially by
revenues help to providing higher wages and other facilities to attract skilled people and also
alleviate the send existing staff for training and developing necessary skills. But as the
above barriers company has accumulated losses making available higher wages to certain
set of people can lead to internal worker problem on parity of wages and also
company fails to attract the best talent due to its reputation of loss making
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 26
organisation.
Lack of Present lay out of the plant does not have the infrastructure does not have
2 infrastructure for correct technology to handle coke oven gas as all jobs within a radius of 40
implementation m could be a source of fire/ignition . Un authorised persons can not be
of the technology allowed to work in the area without shutting down the gas system. As per
present lay out ,the material handling systems like EOT cranes work on
overhead and run by electric supply connected with DSL ;there are
continuous sparks . This is very dangerous the gas area has to be completely
modified with new infra structure layout. This can be proved by plant
records.
How CDM
revenues help to CDM revenues help to overcome the barrier by changing the lay out and
alleviate the shifting and carry out infra structure changes.
above barriers
Lack of previous Company has no previous experience of using coke oven gas. Hence
3 experience in having no previous experience acts as technical barrier. This can be
using coke oven supported by plant records.
gas.
How CDM CDM revenues enable company to appoint with previous experience by
revenues help to offering higher wages and other incentives. But as the company has
alleviate the accumulated losses making available higher wages to certain set of people
above barriers can lead to internal worker problem on parity of wages and also company
fails to attract the best talent due to its reputation of loss making
organisation.
Uncertainties of The coke oven gas is sourced from UGML and the operations of UGML
4
availability of Blast furnace is not under control of LSIL. Any planned or unplanned
coke oven gas. shutdowns which are in control of UGML will immediately affect coke oven
gas supply which will disrupt LSIL production. This is definite barrier which
can not be overcome by LSIL and hence has to carry alternative furnace oil
storage and burner system in addition to coke oven gas system. This can be
supported by the agreement with UGML and plant visit.
How CDM The CDM alleviate the barrier by allowing LSIL maintain the alternative
revenues help to existing system to eliminate disruption of production. But this is partial
alleviate the alleviation as the coke oven gas is sourced from UGML where LSIL do not
above barriers have control.
5 Regulatory and As the whole area will attract classification of highly hazardous area they
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 27
technological come under Chief Controller Of Explosives CCOE and permissions are to be
problem sought and got.
The following restrictions will be placed due to the poisonous and explosive
nature of coke oven gas
This acts as regulatory/ technological barrier for coke oven gas based heat
generation. This can be supported by CCOE regulations.
How CDM CDM revenues will help the company to plan provide for instrumentation to
revenues help to detect any leakages and increase the safety provisions so that regulatory
alleviate the conditions are adhered strictly.
above barriers
No control over As coke oven gas is being sourced from UGML the project proponent does
6
coke oven gases not have control on quality and quantity of gas availability.
and Related
design problem. The coke oven gas produced by the pyrolysis process contains tar,
ammonia,napthlene,light oil and sulphur before the gas is used as fuel. The
cleaning process is responsibility of UGML as LSIL is getting the surplus
coke oven gas after UGML have used coke oven gas in their processes.
The furnace burner system is designed to use clean coke oven gas and due to
any reason the coke oven gas is not free of these impurities then furnace
working will be affected. The design of furnace burner is critical and hence
unclean coke oven gas will present design problem.
Water present in coke oven gas will also present design problems as the pipe
line might get clogged if the atmospheric temperature falls below 4 deg c.
The above can be supported by research article “coke manufacturing” in
pollution prevention and abatement hand book of world bank group,
research article “investigation of the hazards of using manufactured gas in
Baltimore ” by Shrader and other research articles.
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 28
How CDM The CDM alleviate the barrier by allowing LSIL maintain the alternative
revenues help to existing system to eliminate disruption of production. But this is partial as
alleviate the the coke oven gas is sourced from UGML where LSIL do not have control.
above barriers .
7 Production The composition of coke oven gas is critical as it decides the heat
related problem availability. As the composition of coke oven gas can not be fully
guaranteed the heat availability in the furnace can be subjected to variation
and this will directly affect LSIL production.
The problem of what to do with coke oven gases when LSIL furnaces are
shut down is a concern which has to be addressed. The following two
options are being considered.
Option 1 A boiler needs to be installed which will burn the coke oven gases
and produce steam. LSIL have presently no use for this steam and hence
have to find a consumer for steam. LSIL is considering installation of such
boiler so that waste heat is used and not wasted by burning while sending it
to atmosphere through chimney. This option needs extra investments to the
extent of approximately Rs 80 million.
Option 2 LSIL will send coke oven gases to chimney and flare them before
letting out into atmosphere. The energy is wasted and LSIL have to provide
flare system at an additional cost of approximately Rs 30 million.
How CDM CDM revenues will enable the company to overcome the problem by
revenues help to providing one of the above options or any other measure.
alleviate the
above barriers
8 Whether fossil 1 Barrier 1 : fossil fuel based system is very well established technology and
fuel based heat do not face skilled personnel problem as pool of trained people is large while
generation face waste heat recovery systems are developing technology which is why skilled
the barriers personnel problem is faced by project activity. As LSIL is operating the
fossil fuel based system from inception it is business as usual and hence this
barrier will not be faced.
3 Barrier 3 : Company has fossil fuel handling experience hence furnace oil
based systems will not face this barrier in . As LSIL is operating the fossil
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 29
fuel based system from inception it is business as usual and hence this
barrier will not be faced.
4 Barrier 5: fossil fuel based heat generation is steady and proper regulations
are in place. As LSIL is operating the fossil fuel based system from inception
it is business as usual and hence this barrier will not be faced.
5 Barrier 4,6,7 : These are specific coke oven gas related barriers not
applicable to fossil fuel based systems. As LSIL is operating the fossil fuel
based system from inception it is business as usual and hence this barrier
will not be faced.
Barriers due to
prevailing
practice.
How CDM CDM revenues help to make the project activity feasible and enable the
revenues help to company to put the project activity and cross the barrier of prevailing
alleviate the practice of not using the waste heat in sponge iron industry.
above barrier
Whether fossil Fossil fuel based heat generation does not face this barrier as it is common
fuel based heat practice to establish such units.
generation face
the barrier
Sub-Step –3.b. Show that the identified barriers would not prevent the implementation of at least
one of the alternatives (except the proposed project activity).
In section B.4 all the realistic and credible alternatives have been discussed in step 1 in line with
methodology and in the above section the barriers have been discussed and the concludes as follows:
The conclusion arrived was the continuation of use of fossil fuel as fuel in the furnaces was the only
viable and credible alternative( H4) as it is existing scenario and is business as usual scenario also.
page 30
None of these units are having furnaces using coke oven gas for heating
in furnaces.
The project activity is to generate heat from excess waste coke oven
gas generated in coke ovens after the use of gases in coke ovens. The
coke ovens produce coke and coke is used in steel industry where the
blast furnace is used for melting. Hence the steel unit which does not
have blast furnace do not have requirement of coke and hence coke oven
gas is not available as they do not have coke ovens.
The industry followed the practice of letting the excess coke oven gases
out into atmosphere without utilising waste heat.
As per the ministry web site www.steel.nic.in the small steel mills split
up is as follows
Excess Coke oven gas in all the above industries is being used for
captive power generation and are under CDM project activities . If the
part of coke oven gases could have been used in furnace heating then
also 5 out of 36 units make less than 15% diffusion.
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 31
None of these units are having furnaces using coke oven gas as heat source.
The industry followed the practice of letting the excess coke oven gases out
into atmosphere without utilising waste heat.
As per the ministry web site www.steel.nic.in the small steel mills split up is as
follows
Excess Coke oven gas in all the above industries is being used for captive
power generation and are under CDM project activities .
1 LSIL do not have blast furnace and coke oven batteries which generate coke
oven gas.
2 Excess coke oven gas is sourced from UGML after their consumption of
coke oven gas in coke ovens
3 Coke oven gas is used as heat source only and no power generation is done.
.
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 32
STEP 1. Identification of
alternatives to the project
activity consistent with
mandatory laws and
regulations.
Y
Project is
Additional
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 33
a) The methodology gives 4 steps to determine the baseline. All these 4 steps have been discussed in B.4
and arrived at baseline scenario of W2/H4 as the WECM would have been flared before letting into
atmosphere and the existing business as usual scenario where fossil fuel is used to provide heat in
furnaces of LSIL.
The baseline is the same scenario existing prior to the start of implementation of project activity.
The base line is fossil fuel i.e. Furnace oil for RHF and LPG for Coiler/CGL are being been fired in pre
project scenario and the same scenario of using fossil fuel for firing in furnaces would have been
continued in the absence of project activity as it is business as usual scenario.
The methodology lists realistic and credible alternatives to project activity and arrives at conclusion of
continuation of current situation as the only plausible alternative in the absence of project activity.
b) The emission reductions are achieved by displacing fossil fuel used in furnaces with waste coke oven
gas which uses only waste heat and does not use any fuel.
c) The additionality has been proved using additionality tool “the tool for the demonstration and
assessment of additionality” (version 05.2) EB 39.
d) The baseline emissions have been calculated for scenario 1 using equations 1, 1a, 1a.2, 1h. The
methodology states that if the project activity is generation of heat only then one of the two sub sections
under scenario 1 shall be used for estimating the base line.
As the project activity is for generation of heat only ,Base line emissions are calculated for Scenario 1 as
the heat is obtained from fossil fuel in baseline. The applicable equations is 1a.2
The heat generated is calculated by using gas analysis and calculate heating value and the flow of
WECM. As 100% heat is generated by WECM the metered values of flow will be used and heating value
is calculated using gas analyser data.
The methodology requires capping for element of conservativeness. We have selected Method 2 using
manufacturer’s data and applicable equation 1g to calculate baseline cap f cap.
page 34
As the project activity is for generation of heat only, Base line emissions are calculated for Scenario 1 as
clarified by note under this scenario. The applicable equations is 1a.2
BE Ther.y = f cap*f wcm**∑ ∑( (HG j y *EF heat, y )+(MG/ ή mech,tur)) *EF heat, y (equation 1a-2)
MG/ ή mech,tur = 0 as no mechanical energy is generated in the project activity the equation becomes
BE Ther.y = Base line emissions from thermal energy during the year in tons of CO2
HG j y = Net quantity of heat supplied by the project activity in the year TJ
EF heat, y = CO2 emission factor t CO2/TJ
wcm = fraction of total heat generated by project activity using waste energy =1 as the heat generation
Is purely from waste energy
f cap= fraction of total energy produced using equation 1h
EF CO2,I,j
EF heat, y = ∑wsi,j ------------- ( 1a-22)
ή EP,I,y
As UGML is a new plant and no historical data is available Method 3 Case 1 is selected and following
equations will be used to estimate f cap.,
Q OE,BL
f cap = ------------ (1h)
Q OE, y
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 35
Q OE,BL = Output energy that can be theoretically produced to be determined on the basis of maximum
recoverable energy from WECM which would have been released in the absence of project activity.
The project emissions (PE y) are zero as no cleaning of gases is done in the project activity and no
electricity is used for any other purpose during handling of delivered coke oven gas. No auxiliary fuel is
used while using waste energy.
Emission Reductions
ER y = BE Therm, y - PE y = BE Therm, y
page 36
page 37
Base line
The base line is Furnace oil/LPG which could have been fired if waste coke oven gas is not available. The
furnace oil is used in RHF and LPG is used in CGL and Coiler furnaces in current situation.
The project activity reduces GHG emissions as Waste coke oven gas would have been burnt by UGML
before letting into atmosphere in the absence of the project activity and LSIL uses this waste coke oven
gas in their reheating furnace to provide required heat which would have been otherwise provided by
firing Furnace oil/LPG. GHG emission due to burning of fossil fuel is avoided and thus achieves reduction
in GHG emissions.
BE Ther.y = f cap*f wcm**∑ ∑( (HG j y *EF heat, y )+(MG/ ή mech,tur)) *EF heat, y (equation 1a-2)
MG/ ή mech,tur = 0 as no mechanical energy is generated in the project activity the equation becomes
BE Ther.y = Base line emissions from thermal energy during the year in tons of CO2
HG j y = Net quantity of heat supplied by the project activity in the year TJ
EF heat, y = CO2 emission factor t CO2/TJ
fwcm = fraction of total heat generated by project activity using waste energy =1 as the heat generation
is purely from waste energy
f cap= fraction of total energy produced using equation 1g
EF CO2,I,j
EF heat, y = ∑wsi,j ------------- ( 1a-22)
ή EP,I,y
EF CO2,I,j = CO2 Emission factor for base line fuel t CO2/TJ
ή EP,I,y =Maximum efficiency 100%
wsi,j = fraction of total heat that is used by the recipient =1 as total heat is used is purely waste energy.
As UGML is a new plant and no historical data is available Method 3 Case 1 is selected and following
equations will be used to estimate f cap.,
Q OE,BL
f cap = ------------ (1h)
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 38
Q OE, y
Q OE,BL = Output energy that can be theoretically produced to be determined on the basis of maximum
recoverable energy from WECM which would have been released in the absence of project activity.
Calculation of f wcm
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 39
Calculation of ∑ ∑HG j y
Calculation of EF heat, y
EF CO2,I,j
EF heat, y = ∑wsi,j ------------- ( 1a-22)
ή EP,I,y
EF CO2,I,j = CO2 Emission factor for base line fuel t CO2/TJ
ή EP,I,y =Maximum efficiency 100%
wsi,j = fraction of total heat that is used by the recipient =1 as total heat is used is purely waste energy.
page 40
6 f cap 1 1 1 Assumed.
Actual value to
be taken during
every year
calculations.
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 41
Project emissions
PE y =0
Leakage
page 42
B.7. Application of the monitoring methodology and description of the monitoring plan:
page 43
Description of Metered value for WECM/Waste gas and gas composition. Log book of hourly
measurement methods reading is signed by plant manager daily. The average hourly reading is
and procedures to be calculated and this average reading is multiplied by working hours to arrive at the
applied: day’s energy. Meters calibrated regularly. LSIL internal consumption meter and
export meter whose value can be cross checked with UGML meter.
QA/QC procedures to The meters will undergo maintenance/calibration once every year. Sale records
be applied: and purchase receipts will be used to ensure consistency.
Accuracy of Meter : 0.5%
Supportive Document: Technical specifications of meter
Any comment: Data will be measured and cross checked .sales receipts will be used for
verification. Records will be maintained for 12 years as per CDM requirement
The objective is to facilitate adoption of authentic baseline emission data and also
to ensure uniformity in the calculation of CO2 emission reductions by CDM
Project developers, the Central Electric Authority in cooperation with GTZ
CDM-India has compiled a data base containing the necessary data on CO2
emissions for all grid connected power stations in India. The data base currently
covers the five fiscal years 2000-01 to 2007-08.CEA intends to update data base
at the end of each financial year.
The document gives the emission factor for fossil fuels considered. We have used
these values.
QA/QC procedures to nil
be applied:
Any comment: Most recent version of data base to be used.
page 44
Source of data to be CEA CO2 Data base Version 5.0 November 2009.
used:
Value of data applied
for the purpose of
calculating expected
emission reductions in
section B.5
Description of Government of India, Ministry of Power, and Central Electricity Authority in
measurement methods technical cooperation with Indo-German Energy Programme have issued “CO2
and procedures to be Baseline Data base for the Indian Power Sector’ User Guide Version 5.0
applied: November 2009. This document along with CO2 Data base excel calculations are
available on web site www.cea.nic.in
The objective is to facilitate adoption of authentic baseline emission data and also
to ensure uniformity in the calculation of CO2 emission reductions by CDM
Project developers, the Central Electric Authority in cooperation with GTZ
CDM-India has compiled a data base containing the necessary data on CO2
emissions for all grid connected power stations in India. The data base currently
covers the five fiscal years 2000-01 to 2007-08.CEA intends to update data base
at the end of each financial year.
The document gives the emission factor for fossil fuels considered. we have used
these values.
QA/QC procedures to nil
be applied:
Any comment: Most recent version of data base to be used.
Calculated ex-ante value for EF CO2,is y = 117028 t CO2/TJ fixed for entire credit
period.
page 45
page 46
Description of Metered value for WECM/Waste gas and gas composition. Log book of hourly
measurement methods reading is signed by plant manager daily. The average hourly reading is
and procedures to be calculated and this average reading is multiplied by working hours to arrive at the
applied: day’s energy. Meters calibrated regularly. LSIL internal consumption meter and
export meter whose value can be cross checked with UGML meter.
QA/QC procedures to The meters will undergo maintenance/calibration once every year. Sale records
be applied: and purchase receipts will be used to ensure consistency.
Accuracy of Meter : 0.5%
Supportive Document: Technical specifications of meter
Any comment: Data will be measured and cross checked .sales receipts will be used for
verification. Records will be maintained for 12 years as per CDM requirement
(B) Scope
This procedure is applicable to waste heat based project of LSIL.
(C) Responsibilities
We define below the responsibilities of the professionals involved in running the project activity.
Shift Engineer (Operations): Responsible for proper operation of the mechanical equipment and
reporting hourly and eight hourly data of quantity WECM consumed, temperature and pressure of
WECM and product output. The report is then sent to the Manager (O & M) for his review.
Shift Engineer (maintenance): Responsible for proper maintenance management. The report is
then sent to the Manager (plant) for his review on a daily basis
Manager (Plant): Responsible for operation, maintenance and management of plant will be
reviewing the monitored parameters shift-wise and presenting a daily executive summary report, duly
signed by himself, to the General Manager (Plant).
He will be in charge of all CDM related matters and CDM officer will be directly reporting to him
CDM officer: He will be reporting to General Manager and will be responsible for preparing required
documentation and reviewing the accuracy of various reports with counter checks along with project
developer. He will be responsible for internal audit every month regarding CDM project matter.
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 47
B.8. Date of completion of the application of the baseline study and monitoring methodology and
the name of the responsible person(s)/entity(ies):
>>
Preparation of this document has been done by “Lloyds Steel Industries Ltd, Engineering division.”
whose address is
Responsible person for baseline and monitoring methodology covered in this PDD.
Mr R.M.Alegavi
Vice President (Technology)
Lloyds Steel Industries Ltd
Engineering division
21-B Modern Centre
Sane Guruji Marg
Mahalaxmi
Mumbai 400011
Tel No 91-22-30418111, 30418221 Fax No 91-22-30418260
rmalegavi@lloyds.in, rmalegavi@hotmail.com
page 48
The project activity reduces the environmental pollution by eliminating presently used fossil fuels.
The waste gases would any way have been let into atmosphere by waste gas generator UGML in the
absence of project activity.
LSIL have got consent to establish for the project activity and consent to operate will be got after
commissioning of modified system which is expected in April-June 2010.
E.1. Brief description how comments by local stakeholders have been invited and compiled:
>>
LSIL identifies as stake holder the following parties
The company officials personally met the representatives of Panchayat and appraised the details of
project activity. Then the meeting with village sarpanch was held approximately after a fortnight on
02/02/2010 to discuss and receive comments and clarify immediately
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 49
Application for consent to establish has been received. Consent to operate will be received after pre
commissioning activities.
4 Equipment suppliers.
The equipment specifications provided, enquiries issued and orders released after consultations.
The board members considered the project on 25/10/2008 and appreciated environment friendly project.
Bhugaon village sarpanch is the elected head of Panchayat body created for looking after interests of the
village.
page 50
2 How the village is benefited 1 The pollution caused by furnace oil and LPG use will
be totally eliminated as waste gas from Uttam Galva
will now be used which would have been let into
atmosphere by Uttam Galva after flaring.
4 Plans for village development LSIL is making continuous efforts to involve in works
to provide social benefits to the society.
page 51
Sarapanch, village Bhugaon raised the points of activities required to be carried out by company
for benefiting the village. The company will work with panchayat so that the progress of the village
people and facilities are addressed.
Permission have been sought from the State agencies like MSEDCL, MSPCB, etc. wherever required
legally and consent to establish have been received and required consent to operate will be received
before commissioning of power plant.
LSIL have got consent to establish for the project activity and consent to operate will be got after
commissioning of modified system which is expected in April – June 2010.
LSIL Board of directors which has external directors representing the financial institutions in the board
meeting of 25/10/2008 and their approval has been received. The board appreciated the project activity
and directed to apply for CDM registration
E.3. Report on how due account was taken of any comments received:
>>
The relevant comments and important clauses mentioned in the project documents/ Detailed project
report, clearance from MSPCB (Maharashtra State Pollution Control Board) were considered while
preparation of CDM Project Design Document. LSIL management representatives met various stake
holders for appraisal regarding project activity and sought the support.
LSIL management has decided to interact with village panchayat to make sustainable contribution to
village welfare. The proposed schemes will target problems of drinking water and education.
All the stake holders appreciated the energy efficient environment friendly project activity which has
sustainable contribution to the development.
LSIL received the comments from all stake holders and have taken care in specifying the new Reheating
furnace and modification of CGL and Coiler furnaces. LSIL have taken steps to get the project activity
registered with CDM EB.
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 52
Annex 1
page 53
Annex 2
The project activity does not use any ODA financial assistance and also public funding from Annexure 1
Countries.
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 54
Annex 3
BASELINE INFORMATION
a) The methodology lists realistic and credible alternatives to project activity and arrives at conclusion
of continuation of current situation as the only plausible alternative in the absence of project activity.
The baseline is the same scenario existing prior to the start of implementation of project activity.
The base line is fossil fuel i.e. Furnace oil for RHF and LPG for Coiler/CGL are being been fired in pre
project scenario and the same scenario of using fossil fuel for firing in furnaces would have been
continued in the absence of project activity as it is business as usual scenario.
b) The emission reductions are achieved by displacing fossil fuel used in furnaces with waste coke oven
gas which uses only waste heat and does not use any fuel.
As the project activity is for generation of heat only, Base line emissions are calculated for Scenario 1 as
clarified by note under this scenario. The applicable equations is 1a.2
BE Ther.y = f cap*f wcm**∑ ∑( (HG j y *EF heat, y )+(MG/ ή mech,tur)) *EF heat, y (equation 1a-2)
MG/ ή mech, tur = 0 as no mechanical energy is generated in the project activity the equation becomes
BE Ther.y = Base line emissions from thermal energy during the year in tons of CO2
HG j y = Net quantity of heat supplied by the project activity in the year TJ
EF heat, y = CO2 emission factor t CO2/TJ
wcm = fraction of total heat generated by project activity using waste energy =1 as the heat generation
Is purely from waste energy
f cap= fraction of total energy produced using equation 1h
EF CO2,I,j
EF heat, y = ∑wsi,j ------------- ( 1a-22)
ή EP,I,y
EF CO2,I,j = CO2 Emission factor for base line fuel t CO2/TJ
ή EP,I,y =Maximum efficiency 100%
wsi,j = fraction of total heat that is used by the recipient =1 as total heat is used is purely waste energy.
1 Calculation of f cap
As UGML is a new plant and no historical data is available Method 3 Case 1 is selected and following
equations will be used to estimate f cap.,
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 55
Q OE,BL
f cap = ------------ (1h)
Q OE, y
Q OE,BL = Output energy that can be theoretically produced to be determined on the basis of maximum
recoverable energy from WECM which would have been released in the absence of project activity.
Calculation of f wcm
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 56
Calculation of ∑ ∑HG j y
Calculation of EF heat, y
EF CO2,I,j
EF heat, y = ∑wsi,j ------------- ( 1a-22)
ή EP,I,y
EF CO2,I,j = CO2 Emission factor for base line fuel t CO2/TJ
ή EP,I,y =Maximum efficiency 100%
wsi,j = fraction of total heat that is used by the recipient =1 as total heat is used is purely waste energy.
page 57
6 f cap 1 1 1 Assumed.
Actual value to
be taken during
every year
calculations.
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 58
Project emissions
PE y =0
Leakage
The baseline reductions are ex ante based and fixed for entire crediting period.
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 59
Annex 4
MONITORING INFORMATION
Serial Activity
No.
1.0 GHG Performance Parameter
1.1 The following parameters will be monitored :
• Coke oven gas consumption.
• Temperature and pressure of coke oven gas .
• Net production from furnaces.
• Calorific value of WECM
• Waste gas WECM quantity
Plant operation and maintenance: plant manager will be responsible for total plant
operation and maintenance of all project equipment and monitoring equipment.
2.0 Metering System
2.1 The metering system for the waste heat based project activity of
• Flow meters for monitoring coke oven gas flow to each furnace.
• Gas analyser of waste gas WECM
Temperature gauge for WECM
• Pressure gauge for WECM
The Shift Engineer shall monitor hourly and eight hourly data on total production from,
WECM consumption, and net heat available. The hourly data shall be recorded in the
generation log book and the eight hourly data shall be recorded in the plant log book. The
complete and accurate records in the plant log book shall be signed by the Shift Engineer.
Both of these reports shall be sent to the Manager (Plant)
page 60
t with alarming System which gives a prior indication of any fluctuations in the operating
of the consumption thereby enabling the operators to take necessary preventive measures.
These measures will be undertaken in order to detect and minimize the uncertainty levels in
data monitoring.
6.0 Experience and Training
6.1 All the Shift Engineers (operation and Instrumentation) shall be qualified engineers/
technologists. The technical staff will also be trained by OEM representatives.
6.2 Emergency Preparedness Plan
The total heat generating system will be equipped with an “Automatic Alarming System”
which helps the operators to take necessary preventive actions before any kind of non-
functioning of the gas system which may results. LSIL shall have a fire fighting system in
place.
In addition to the above the following standard procedures for tackling emergencies arising
from,
• No coke oven gas flow
Internal audit
CDM officer will carry out internal audit every month as per internal audit plan and
prepare all necessary CDM related documentation. He will be reporting to General Manager
The company has in place “Audit Plan” which envisages regular monitoring and audit of
CDM project . The project performance review will be carried out under this audit plan by
CDM officer of the company who will be directly reporting to General Manager.
Reference
Project Design Document, maintenance manuals, standard OEM procedures and CDM
documentation.
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 61
Appendix
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 62
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 63
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 64
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 65
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 66
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 67
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03
page 68
-----