Results showed that there has been a significant increase in the number of farmer-
respondents who borrowed from formal sources of capital after the program
implementation in the study area. It was found out that the program did not help farmers
in settling loan obligations, however, the small indemnity payments helped farmers in
minimizing their loan defaults.
PCIC delivered indemnities before the set days (60) with the longest time of
release of 51 days and a fastest of 17 days. Nevertheless, the study found out that there
iv
was a significant difference (P584) between the actual mean (P2,920) amount of
indemnity and the mean entitled (P3,504) indemnity payment that should be received by
the farmers under the program at five percent probability level. This means that a
substantial amount of the indemnity payment was being taken away from the farmer-
claimants. Yet farmers cited that instead of having portion of capitals to be wasted
whenever losses occurred, with indemnity payment at least some amount could have been
plowed back and would have not been irretrievably lost.
Majority (72%) disagreed that their fear regarding risks inherent to agriculture
was reduced because of the Rice Crop Insurance Program. Seventy-five percent of the
farmers disagreed that rice insurance program protected their investment from the natural
calamities, pests and diseases that can be associated to the small indemnity they received.
They also added that the crop insurance program did not influence their decision to use
more input and expand their farm area. Furthermore, all of the respondents claimed that
they were not being able to replant when crop damage occurred. This happened because
all the indemnities given to them were used in paying their loans partially.
Forty-eight (80%) of the respondents indicated that they were moderately satisfied
with the program since they received indemnity payments from the program that can
alleviate their situation even minimally when misfortunes occurred due to natural
disasters. Twelve (20%) farmers who were not satisfied complained about the amount
deducted for every loan they make which was the premium. Furthermore, farmer-
respondents concluded that they are willing to participate in the rice insurance program as
they are willing to participate in the farmers’ assistance activity offered by cooperatives
together with LBP. These findings indicate that the patronage of these farmers towards
the Rice Crop Insurance Program will continue as long as formal lenders would be
willing to offer loans.