W
M
Every so often friends phone, saying that they have as I see it through my eyes, so you can see where I
1 heard Charles Wheeling give a lecture in their area; am coming from and where I am going.
0
7 and, from what he says, it is clear that he is opposed “The male is independent; the female needs a
0 to Ellen White and our historic teachings. Unfortu- provider. There is a design in this. Why? Women feel
nately, I have had other friends who have abandoned if they bear no children, they are unfulfilled. Why?
confidence in the Spirit of Prophecy after attending Why did God create everything before He made Adam
his meetings or listening to his sermon tapes. and Eve? Why did God not create Eve at the same
One cannot help but wonder how Charles can be time He made Adam?”
so successful in capturing the minds of faithful be- By this time, many in the audience are beginning
lievers at his meetings. So, briefly, I am going to ex- to feel they must be ignorant because they cannot
plain how he does it. If this is not a topic that inter- figure out what is being said. This gives them the
ests you, then do not read it. But I write to protect impression that Wheeling is more intelligent than they
other friends in advance. are—and, in turn, opens their minds to be willing to
In three meetings in Ringgold, Georgia, during consider new concepts which do not agree with their
Sabbath, June 30, 2001, and in a fourth meeting that beliefs.
night, Charles Wheeling presented a series of four A fundamental lesson we should take to heart is
lectures. One historic believer who attended them that it can be dangerous to listen to speakers whose
laboriously took thirty-two pages of very careful notes. belief systems are strange or unknown. You are ven-
The following quotations are reconstructed from turing on unstable ground when you do this. In con-
them. trast, you know you can trust the Bible and Spirit of
Prophecy when, bowing in prayer for guidance, you
Charles began the 10:00 a.m. morning meeting thoughtfully study those precious books for yourself.
(which was entitled “Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob”) I urge you to stay in the rich pastures of God’s Word;
by continually mixing allegorical and symbolical ap- stay away from the cliff.
plications as he related the Biblical story of those
three families. By the time the meeting was done, the “Now to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Visitors told
audience had good reason to be confused. You may Abraham he would have his own son. But he and
recall that telling confusing and/or boring stories was Sarah were very old and past childbearing age.”
one of the methods devised by Erickson, the founder The audience is now trying to follow Charles
of Ericksonian hypnosis, which captures peoples’ closely, and he launches into a detailed list of names
minds while they remain awake. He said it was the and what he considers to be their meaning. It is a
simplest way to hypnotize people. Although they re- hodgepodge of unrelated points, which only adds to
mained awake, they had become susceptible to what- the confusion. Here are a few samples:
ever he might tell them thereafter. Erickson’s theo-
ries were expanded by Bandler and Grinder (with “Sarai means the wife of the governor or lord.
their “neuro-lingustic programming”) and popular- Canaan means the land of humiliation, a place where
ized by Savage in his LAB courses (who, among oth- one will wallow in the dust. Eliezer, Abraham’s chief
DATE OF PUBLICATION: MARCH 2002
ers, taught them to over a thousand of our pastors servant, could be a representative of Satan. Elieser
and leaders). also means the great idol of Damascus. Damascus
(For more on Ericksonian hypnosis, Neuro-lin- means a holy place. Lot is the veil man, needing to be
guistic programing, LAB, and hypnosis, we refer you saved. Rebekah means she will fetter you. Esau is a
to our book, Hypnotism Tractbook [134 pp., 8½ x red man or rough handler, like a cowboy. Leah will
11, $10.50 + $2.50], which contains a collection of make you disgusted, ugly. Rachel is best of the flock,
several of our tracts on these topics). a good traveler, like us. Leah was covered up. Jacob
Here is a brief sample to show you the confusing could not see her. We are covered up by Jesus, so
nature of Wheeling’s initial 10:00 a.m. presentation: others cannot see our nakedness.”
“Today, I will present an interpretation of history Charles then explains the mandrake transaction
in this way:
2 Waymarks
W A Day with Charles Wheeling 3
M
1 “Leah’s son finds mandrakes. He takes them to settle down after crossing the Jordan and the next
0 Leah, his mother. Rachel sees him. She is peeking generation arises. Over and over again, the cycles of
7
0 out the window. She wants the mandrakes. Leah says, change come.
‘What will you give me?’ A typical Jew. Mandrakes “We think we are the people of God. Seventh-day
were plants that can cause conception in women, an Adventists. We inflate ourselves, thinking we already
aphrodisiac. The barren becomes pregnant. Rachael know everything. We develop myths and legends. We
wanted a child. So this is how Jacob and Rachael make heroes of ourselves and tell the world how im-
have a son of the promise. The three women—Sarah, portant we are. We think we are the remnant! We have
Rebekah, and Rachel—all have something to do with placed a cloud over Scripture. It is only what we say
the Holy Spirit. We will talk about this later.” Scripture says. We cling to these decades-old man-
The meeting ends. made ideas. But we must read the Bible as it reads
in order to know the truth.
The 2:00 p.m. Sabbath meeting begins. It carries “Now, when the SDA movement was born, we
the intriguing title, “Changing Times/Changing brought certain baggage along. We used the proof-
Minds.” The time has come for Charles to begin chang- text method of proving things. Not good. All Chris-
ing those in his audience. Eventually, Charles arrives tians did that back in 1844. What we are doing is go
at his main topic for the day: The Adventist Church to the Bible, take a verse here and there, and say,
and its flawed prophet and teachings. ‘This is what the Bible says.’ We prove the Sabbath
“The early Christian church was disowned, cast this way. Doing this works occasionally; teaching the
out. Friends had mock funerals for those disowned. Sabbath by proof-texting is alright, but it can be mis-
Early Adventists were also outcasts. Most of them used to prove wrong ideas.”
were young people. God made us out of dirt. Early You should be aware of the fact that Charles’ be-
Adventists said they would never have a creed. James liefs run parallel to many of those espoused by our
White said this, and others did also. —But today we liberals. Ridicule of the so-called “proof-text method”
have a creed, the 27 Fundamentals. We have a set of is one of their techniques. Such ridicule was promi-
doctrines, a creed! People are rotten and behave as nently used in the two liberal sermons at the 1995
human beings. Adventists have canned answers. Yet Utrecht Session, preached in an attempt to prove that
that is the spirit of Catholicism! We need to learn women’s ordination was Scriptural. The Bible obvi-
from the past. We do not need canned answers.” ously does not support their position, so the liberals
By this time, many in the audience are favorable have to weaken our confidence in what the good Book
to Charles’ idea, that we should not have “canned teaches. (The liberals maintain that, instead of rely-
answers”; for we do not want “the spirit of Catholi- ing on the clear words of Scripture, we should let
cism.” What they do not realize is that he is about to our Ph.D. “scholars” analyze the original languages,
lead their impressionable minds toward a rejection the historical context, and ancient “cultic symbols”
of another type of “canned answers”: the Spirit of in order to arrive at the correct meaning. We must
Prophecy writings and our historical prophetic be- trust our souls to the “Bible scholars.”)
liefs. A similar approach is used by Adventist gays, to
Similar techniques are used by other itinerant prove that Scripture supports homosexuality! They
preachers. You will be told that you need to go by attempt to talk away the eight or so passages which
“the Bible only,” that “truth is progressive,” that “there directly condemn homosexual practices.
is new light for our time,” and that Ellen White wrote The truth is that the Bible is full of specific rules,
“for her time in history.” Then, freed from the con- commands, and promises. By declaring that we will
straints of the Spirit of Prophecy, the preacher pre- no longer consider or obey “proof texts,”—we destroy
sents his errors as the “new light needed just now.” If the ability of the Scripture to teach and guide us. We
you object, he tells you that you should accept “new have decided that we will no longer believe what we
light.” If you quote Spirit of Prophecy disproving his read!
“new light” theory, he will say “we must go by the Having destroyed the Scriptural safeguard in the
Bible only.” What he is saying is, “Accept my inter- minds of some at the meeting, Charles is now pre-
pretation of the Bible, not the Spirit of Prophecy’s.” pared to lead them into deeper levels of Wheeling
—As soon as the preacher belittles the Spirit of Proph- theology:
ecy, get out of there quick and take your loved ones “Here’s an example of the faulty use of the proof-
with you! text method: ‘Judas went out and hanged himself; go
Charles continues: and do thou likewise.’ See, you can prove anything
“Every movement goes through a process of with proof texts! Seventh-day Adventists fell into this
change. In the process of being born and living, they fallacy. That’s why some of our doctrines are not true.
4 Waymarks
One is the investigative judgment. Charles then “exposes” another “terrible” thing
“Now, the Sabbath is true; but some of our cardi- about Ellen White:
nal doctrines have no basis in Scripture. Fortunately, “The last two chapters of Prophets and Kings were
as they have matured, some Adventists have chal- not written by Ellen White. They used other of her
lenged Adventist ideas. But then, when they do, they writings on the subject.”
are ostracized. What should be done? Adventists
should sit down and study with them, so they can Of course they did! Ellen White died before the
learn the truth. I believe you want to know the truth, book was completed, and her helpers had to piece
don’t you? together the closing two chapters from her earlier
“In the past, Adventists who have questioned the writings. What is wrong with that! That fact is well-
doctrines have been smeared instead of being listened known. So, yes, she did write the closing two chap-
to. Dr. J.H. Kellogg was smeared. His character was ters; it was all her writings!
smeared. But Charles does not stop with that. He next turns
“Then there is the role of Ellen G. White. The leg- his guns on our historic teachings.
ends and myths about her have gotten out of hand. “R.R. Figuhr, General Conference president in the
People have made her larger than life. Years ago, I late 1950s and 1960s, was an impatient person. Some
was not permitted to know this. It was covered up facts were brought to Figuhr. So he appointed a com-
because it would makes waves and rock the boat. We mittee, called the Daniel Committee. Important schol-
need to correct some problems about the teachings ars in Adventism were put on that committee. It met
of Ellen G. White.” eight to ten years secretly. Scholarly papers were pre-
Charles then makes much of essentially nothing. sented on Daniel, like the Investigative Judgment, etc.
He speaks mysteriously about how, in earlier decades, But it was locked up. After the committee studied it;
church leaders tried two or three times to correct it was locked up. ‘Don’t publish this,’ they were told.
some of these “problems” about Sister White; but they They locked up the findings and never told us about
were not able to do so, fearful that they would be it.”
branded “heretics” if they exposed these mysterious Here we are told of more ominous, terrible se-
“problems” which Charles does not identify. crets that Charles only hints at. Why? Because if he
Then he mentions the 1919 Bible Conference and said much more, the audience would quickly see his
how church leaders attending it identified the prob- insinuations do not amount to anything. The truth is
lems—but were so horrified at their discovery, they that, prior to the middle of the 1950s, we had godly
determined to bury the truth so it would never be men in our college Bible departments. They were sea-
known. soned pastors and evangelists who had been hired
The real truth is that a small group of men were because they were tried and proven as solid laborers
at this meeting; and, during it, a little discussion about in the Advent cause. Back then, the same held true
some quibbling, which originated with slanted hints for our editors.
by one member (W.W. Prescott), was made for a short But a change came. Some of our men started go-
time before they passed on to other matters. I have a ing to Protestant, Catholic, and secular universities
copy of that 1919 Conference incident. (See my Analy- for doctorates in religious subjects. While there, they
sis of the 1919 Bible Conference—Part 1-3 [WM– imbibed non-Adventist teachings about the law, grace,
537-539], in which I carefully go over the entire con- salvation, the Sanctuary, and Daniel and Revelation.
versation). When the on-again, off-again meetings of the
Charles has now warmed up to his subject, and Daniel Committee began about 1960, the solid Bible
he next passes to a direct attack on a well-known teachers clashed with the newly arrived liberal Bible
historical incident. He charges that Ellen White never teachers. The result of several years of meetings was
held that Bible out at arm’s length. The truth is she a miserable collection of discordant views, hardly
did hold heavy Bibles, not once but twice. Read again worth publishing. As more and more university-brain-
Chapter Four of my book, Prophet of the End. It will washed men were hired in the 1960s as Bible teach-
thrill your heart. (Pages 42-43 discusses the two Bible ers, the situation became so bad, the meetings of the
incidents.) The large Harmon family Bible weighed Daniel Committee were eventually terminated. Some
18½ pounds. In the E.G. White Estate vault, in Takoma of our leaders had learned a terrible truth: The new,
Park, I held that Bible in my hands in the mid-1950s. university-trained Bible teachers were going to hol-