861 tayangan

Diunggah oleh Surendra Elayathamby

- Design Examples to Eurocode
- Ccip Worked Examples Ec2
- Design Aids EuroCode
- Worked Examples Ec2 Def080723
- eurocode 4
- Eurocode Example Load Combinations
- Examples Eurocode2
- How to Design Concrete Structures Using Eurocode 2
- How to Design Beams With Eurocode 2
- Eurocode 2 - Beams
- Worked Example to Eurocode 2 Vol. 1
- Eurocode Load Combinations for Steel Structures 2010
- Eurocode Guide - Online
- Worked Examples to Eurocode 2
- Structrual Concrete Design to Eurocode 2 University Of Sheffield Structural Engineering Masters
- EC3 & EC4 Worked Examples
- Designers’ guide to EN 1994-1-1 Composite Steel and Concrete
- Integral Concrete Bridges to Eurocode 2
- CFD-Eurocode-2-2004
- Designers Guide to EN1991!1!2, 1992-1-2, 1993-1-2 and 1994-1-2 Handbook for Fire Design

Anda di halaman 1dari 8

Beams

4. Beams

R M Moss BSc, PhD, CEng, MICE, MIStructE O Brooker BEng, CEng, MICE, MIStructE

Designing to Eurocode 2

Introduction

The introduction of European standards to UK This guide covers the analysis and design of concrete beams to Eurocode 21

construction is a significant event. The ten design which is essentially the same as with BS 81102. However, the layout and

standards, known as the Eurocodes, will affect content of Eurocode 2 may appear unusual to designers familiar with BS 8110.

all design and construction activities as current Eurocode 2 does not contain the derived formulae or specific guidance on

British standards for design are due to be determining moments and shear forces. This has arisen because it has

withdrawn in 2010. been European practice to give principles in the codes and for the detailed

application to be presented in other sources such as textbooks.

This publication is part of the series of guides

entitled How to design concrete structures using The first guide in this series, How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2:

Eurocode 2. Their aim is to make the transition to Introduction to Eurocodes3, highlighted the key differences between Eurocode 2

Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures as easy and BS 8110, including terminology.

as possible by drawing together in one place key

information and commentary required for the It should be noted that values from the UK National Annex (NA) have been

design of typical concrete elements. used throughout this guide, including values that are embedded in derived

formulae (derivations can be found at www.eurocode2.info). A list of symbols

The cement and concrete industry recognised that related to beam design is given at the end of this guide.

a substantial effort was required to ensure that

the UK design profession would be able to use

Eurocode 2 quickly, effectively, efficiently and Design procedure

with confidence. With support from government,

consultants and relevant industry bodies, the A procedure for carrying out the detailed design of beams is shown in Table 1.

Concrete Industry Eurocode 2 Group (CIEG) was This assumes that the beam dimensions have previously been determined

formed in 1999 and this Group has provided the during conceptual design. Concept designs prepared assuming detailed design

guidance for a co-ordinated and collaborative would be to BS 8110 may be continued through to detailed design using

approach to the introduction of Eurocode 2. As Eurocode 2. More detailed advice on determining design life, actions, material

a result, a range of resources is to be made properties, methods of analysis, minimum concrete cover for durability and

available through The Concrete Centre to help control of crack widths can be found in the accompanying guide How to

designers during the transition period (see back design concrete structures using Eurocode 2: Getting started 4.

cover for details).

Fire resistance

Eurocode 2, Part 1–2: Structural fire design6, gives a choice of advanced,

simplified or tabular methods for determining the fire resistance. Using tables

is the fastest method for determining the minimum dimensions and cover

for beams. There are, however, some restrictions and if these apply further

guidance on the advanced and simplified methods can be obtained from

specialist literature. Rather than giving a minimum cover, the tabular method

is based on nominal axis distance, a (see Figure 1). This is the distance from

the centre of the main reinforcing bar to the top or bottom surface of the

Continues page 3

How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2

Table 1

Beam design procedure

‘How to’ guide Standard

1 Determine design life Getting started NA to BS EN 1990 Table NA.2.1

2 Assess actions on the beam Getting started BS EN 1991 (10 parts) and National Annexes

3 Determine which combinations of actions apply Introduction to Eurocodes NA to BS EN 1990 Tables NA.A1.1 and NA.A1.2 (B)

4 Determine loading arrangements Getting started NA to BS EN 1992–1–1

5 Assess durability requirements and determine concrete strength Getting started BS 8500: 2002

6 Check cover requirements for appropriate fire resistance period Getting started and ‘Fire resistance’ Approved Document B. BS EN 1992–1–1: Section 5

section of this guide

7 Calculate min. cover for durability, fire and bond requirements Getting started BS EN 1992–1–1 Cl 4.4.1

8 Analyse structure to obtain critical moments and shear forces Getting started and Table 3 of this guide BS EN 1992–1–1 section 5

9 Design flexural reinforcement See ‘Flexure’ section of this guide BS EN 1992–1–1 section 6.1

10 Check shear capacity See ‘Vertical shear’ section of this guide BS EN 1992–1–1 section 6.2

11 Check deflection See ‘Deflection’ section of this guide BS EN 1992–1–1 section 7.4

12 Check spacing of bars Getting started BS EN 1992–1–1 section 7.3

Note

NA = National Annex

Table 2

Minimum dimensions and axis distances for beams made with reinforced concrete for fire resistance

Standard fire resistance Minimum dimensions (mm)

Possible combinations of a and bmin where a is the average axis distance and bmin is the width of the beam

Simply supported beams Continuous beams

A B C D E F G H

R60 bmin = 120 160 300 300 120 200

a= 40 35 30 25 25 12a

R90 bmin = 150 200 300 400 150 250

a= 55 45 40 35 35 25

R120 bmin = 200 240 300 500 200 300 450 500

a= 65 60 55 50 45 35 35 30

R240 bmin = 280 350 500 700 280 500 650 700

a= 90 80 75 70 75 60 60 50

Notes

1 This table is taken from BS EN 1992–1–2 Tables 5.5 and 5.6.

2 The axis distance, asd , from the side of the beam to the corner bar should be a +10 mm except where bmin is greater than the values in columns C and F.

3 The table is valid only if the detailing requirements (see note 4) are observed and, in normal temperature design, redistribution of bending moments does not exceed 15%.

4 For fire resistance of R90 and above, for a distance of 0.3l eff from the centre line of each intermediate support, the area of top reinforcement should not be less than the following:

A s,req (x) = A s,req ( 0 )( 1– 2.5 ( x/ l eff ) )

where:

x is the distance of the section being considered from the centre line of the support.

A s,req ( 0 ) is the area of reinforcement required for normal temperature design.

A s,req (x) is the minimum area of reinforcement required at the section being considered but not less than that required for normal temperature design.

l eff is the greater of the effective lengths of the two adjacent spans.

5 For fire resistances R120 – R240, the width of the beam at the first intermediate support should be at least that in column F, if both the following conditions exist:

a there is no fixity at the end support; and

b the acting shear at normal temperature Vsd > 0.67 V Rd,max .

Key

a Normally the requirements of BS EN 1992–1–1 will determine the cover.

Figure 1 Figure 3

Section through structural member, Simplified rectangular stress block for

showing nominal axis distances a and asd concrete up to class C50/60 from Eurocode 2

b εc

ε sc fcd

d2

x As2 0.8x Fsc

Fc

h>b Neutral axis

d

h z

a

As Fst

asd εs

b

Section Strain Stress block and forces

2

4. Beams

Figure 2

member. It is a nominal (not minimum) dimension, so the designer Procedure for determining flexural reinforcement

should ensure that:

a ≥ cnom + f link + f bar /2 and asd = a + 10 mm START

Table 2 gives the minimum dimensions for beams to meet the

standard fire periods. Carry out analysis of beam to determine

design moments (M) (see Table 3)

Outside scope of this guide

≤C50/60?

The design procedure for flexural design is given in Figure 2; this includes Yes

derived formulae based on the simplified rectangular stress block from M

Determine K from K =

Eurocode 2. Table 3 may be used to determine bending moments and bd 2 fck

shear forces for beams, provided the notes to the table are observed.

Determine K’ from Table 4 or

Table 3 K’ = 0.60d – 0.18 d2 – 0.21

Bending moment and shear coefficients for beams where d ≤ 1.0

Moment Shear

Outer support 25% of span moment 0.45 (G + Q) No Compression reinforcement

Is K ≤ K ’ ? required

Near middle of end span 0.900 Gl + 0.100 Ql

At first interior support – 0.094 (G + Q) l 0.63 (G + Q)a

Yes

At middle of interior spans 0.066 Gl + 0.086 Ql Calculate lever arm z from

At interior supports – 0.075 (G + Q) l 0.50 (G + Q) z = d 1 + 1 – 3.53 K ’

[ ]

No compression reinforcement required 2

Key

a 0.55 (G + Q) may be used adjacent to the interior span.

Notes

1 Redistribution of support moments by 15% has been included. Obtain lever arm z from Table 5 or use Calculate compression

2 Applicable to 3 or more spans only and where Qk ≤ G k. reinforcement required from

z= d [1 + 1 – 3.53 K ] ≤ 0.95d

3 Minimum span ≥ 0.85 longest span. 2 (K– K’) fck bd 2

As2 =

4 l is the span, G is the total of the ULS permanent actions, Q is the total fsc(d– d2)

of the ULS variable actions.

where

Calculate tension reinforcement

Table 4

Values for K ’

required from

As =

M

fsc = 700

[ x – d2

x ] ≤ fyd

fyd z

% redistribution d (redistribution ratio) K’

0 1.00 0.205 Calculate tension

Check minimum reinforcement

5 0.95 0.193 requirements (see Table 6) reinforcement required from

0.26 fctm bt d K’fck bd 2 fsc

10 0.90 0.180 As,min = where fck ≥ 25 As = + As2

fyk fyd z fyd

15 0.85 0.166

20 0.80 0.151

25 0.75 0.136 Check maximum reinforcement requirements As,max = 0.04 Ac

for tension or compression reinforcement outside lap locations

Table 5

z/d for singly reinforced rectangular sections

K z/d K z/d Table 6

0.01 0.950a 0.11 0.891 Minimum percentage of required reinforcement

0.02 0.950a 0.12 0.880 fck fctm Minimum percentage (0.26 fctm / fyka)

0.03 0.950a 0.13 0.868 25 2.6 0.13%

0.04 0.950a 0.14 0.856 28 2.8 0.14%

0.05 0.954 0.15 0.843 30 2.9 0.15%

0.06 0.944 0.16 0.830 32 3.0 0.16%

0.07 0.934 0.17 0.816 35 3.2 0.17%

0.08 0.924 0.18 0.802 40 3.5 0.18%

0.09 0.913 0.19 0.787 45 3.8 0.20%

0.10 0.902 0.20 0.771 50 4.1 0.21%

Key Key

a Limiting z to 0.95d is not a requirement of Eurocode 2, but is considered to be good practice. a Assuming fyk = 500 MPa

3

How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2

Figure 4

Strut inclination method Eurocode 2 offers various methods for determining the stress-strain

relationship of concrete. For simplicity and familiarity the method

Concrete strut in compression

presented here is the simplified rectangular stress block, which is

similar to that found in BS 8110 (see Figure 3).

y

class C90/105. However, for concrete greater than class C50/60, the

stress block is modified. It is important to note that concrete strength

is based on the cylinder strength and not the cube strength (i.e. for

class C30/37 the cylinder strength ( fck ) is 30 MPa, whereas the cube

Longitudinal Vertical shear strength is 37 MPa).

reinforcement in tension reinforcement

Vertical shear

Figure 5

Procedure for determining vertical shear reinforcement Eurocode 2 introduces the strut inclination method for shear capacity

checks. In this method the shear is resisted by concrete struts acting in

START compression and shear reinforcement acting in tension.

Determine vEd where: The angle of the concrete strut varies, depending on the shear force

vEd = shear stress at d from face of support [vEd = VEd /(bwz) = VEd /(0.9 bwd)] applied (see Figure 4). The procedure for determining the shear capacity

of a section is shown in Figure 5 (which includes UK NA values) and is

Determine the concrete strut capacity v Rd, max cot y = 2.5

in terms of shear stress in the vertical plane rather than a vertical force

from Table 7 as given in Eurocode 2. Where shear reinforcement is required, then

the angle of the concrete strut should be calculated. For many typical

beams the minimum angle of strut will apply (when cot y = 2.5 or y =

Is Is

21.8º) i.e. for class C30/37 concrete the strut angle exceeds 21.8º only

No No Redesign

vEd < vRd,max coty = 2.5? v Ed < v Rd,max cot y = 1.0?

section when the shear stress is greater than 3.27 N/mm2 (refer to Table 7).

(see Table 7)

As with BS 8110, there is a maximum permitted shear capacity, vRd,max ,

(when cot y = 1.0 or y = 45º), but this is not restricted to 5 MPa as in

Yes (cot y = 2.5) Yes

BS 8110.

Determine y from:

0.18 fck (1 – fck /250) ] Deflection

Calculate area of shear reinforcement: Eurocode 2 has two alternative methods for checking deflection,

Asw vEd bw

= either a limiting span-to-depth ratio may be used or the theoretical

s 0.9 d fywd cot y

deflection can be assessed using the expressions given in the Code.

The latter is dealt with in detail in another guide in this series, How to

Check maximum spacing for vertical shear reinforcement: design concrete structures using Eurocode 2: Deflection6.

s l, max = 0.75 d

span/250 and this is the procedure presented in Figure 6.

Table 7

Minimum and maximum concrete strut capacity in terms of stress

fck

20

v Rd,max cot y = 2.5

2.54

v Rd,max cot y = 1.0

3.68

Flanged beams

25 3.10 4.50

28 3.43 4.97 Flanged beams can be treated in much the same way as in BS 8110.

30 3.64 5.28 The main differences compared with BS 8110 are that the assessment

32 3.84 5.58 of the flange width is more sophisticated (see Figures 9 and 10) and

35 4.15 6.02

40 4.63 6.72 that Eurocode 2 contains a check to confirm that the shear stress at

45 5.08 7.38

50 5.51 8.00 Continues page 7

4

4. Beams

Figure 6 Figure 8

Procedure for assessing deflection Determination of steel stress

START 320

280

Determine Factor 1 (F1)

For ribbed or waffle slabs

F1 = 1 – 0.1 ((bf/bw) – 1) ≥ 0.8† 260

(bf is flange breadth and bw is rib breadth)

Otherwise F1 = 1.0 240

Where the slab span exceeds 7 m and it supports

brittle partitions, F2 = 7/leff ≤ 1.0 200

Otherwise F2 = 1.0

180

Determine Factor 3 (F3) 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0

F3 = 310/ss

Where ss = Stress in reinforcement at serviceability Ratio Gk /Qk

limit state (see Figure 8)

ss may assumed to be 310 MPa (i.e. F3 = 1.0)

c2 = 0.8, gG = 1.35 c2 = 0.6, gG = 1.25

Note: As,prov ≤ 1.5 As,req’d (UK National Annex) Increase

As,prov c2 = 0.6, gG = 1.35 c2 = 0.3, gG = 1.25

c2 = 0.3, gG = 1.35 c2 = 0.2, gG = 1.25

Is basic l/d x K x F1 x F2 x F3 ≥ Actual l/d ? c2 = 0.2, gG = 1.35

No

Yes

To determine stress in the reinforcement (ss), calculate the ratio

Check complete Gk/Qk, read up the graph to the appropriate curve and read across

to determine ssu .

† The Eurocode is ambiguous regarding linear interpolation. It is understood that

As,req 1

it was the intention of the drafting committee that linear interpolation be used

and this is in line with current UK practice.

ss can be calculated from the expression: ss = ssu

As,prov d ( )( )

Figure 7

Basic span-to-depth ratios

36

Notes

34 1 For two-way spanning slabs, the check should be

carried out on the basis of the shorter span.

fck = 50

32 2 This graph assumes simply supported span condition

fck = 45 (K = 1.0).

fck = 40 K = 1.5 for interior span condition

30

K = 1.3 for end span condition

fck = 35 K = 0.4 for cantilevers.

28 fck = 32

Span to depth ratio (l/d)

fck = 30

26 4 Curves based on the following expressions:

fck = 28

1.5

1.5 fck r 0 r0

24

fck = 25

fck = 20

l

d [

= K 11 +

r

+ 3.2 fck

( )]

r

–1

22 where r ≤ r 0

20 and

1.5 fck r 0 r’

18

l

d [

= K 11 +

( r – r ’)

+

fck

12 r0 ]

16

where r > r 0 .

14

12

0.40% 0.60% 0.80% 1.00% 1.20% 1.40% 1.60% 1.80% 2.00%

5

How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2

Figure 11 Figure 9

Procedure for determining flexural capacity of flanged beams Definition of lo, for calculation of effective flange width

START

Carry out analysis of beam to determine design

moments, M (see Table 3)

l1 l2 l3

beff = (bw + beff1 + beff2) where Figure 10

beff1 = (0.2b1 + 0.1 l0) ≤ 0.2 l0 ≤ b1 Effective flange width parameters

beff2 = (0.2b2 + 0.1 l0) ≤ 0.2 l0 ≤ b2

Note: The flange width at the support will be beff

different from that at mid-span. beff,1 beff,2

For symbols refer to Figures 9 and 10

bw

M b1 b1 b2 b2

Determine K from K =

bd 2 fck

where b = bw at support b

b = beff in span

Figure 12

Placing of tension reinforcement in flanged cross section

Determine K’ from Table 4 or

K’ = 0.60d – 0.18 d2 – 0.21 where d ≤ 1.0

beff

As

Calculate lever arm z from

d

z=

2 [1 + 1 – 3.53 K ≤ 0.95d ] hf

x = 2.5 (d – z)

Neutral axis in

flange. Design

Yes as rectangular

Is x ≤ 1.25hf ? section (Figure 2)

and then check

longitudinal shear

(Figure 14)

No

Figure 13

Neutral axis in web

Calculate moment capacity of flange from:

Notations for the connection between flange and web

MR,f = 0.57 fck (beff – bw) hf (d – 0.5hf)

M – MR,f Fd A

and Kf = yf

fck bw d 2

Compressive struts

Fd beff

Dx

Asf

Sf

No

Is Kf ≤ K ’? Redesign section A hf

anchored beyond Fd + D Fd

this projected point

Calculate area of reinforcement required from Check longitudinal

MR,f M – MR,f shear Fd + D Fd

As = + (see Figure 14) bw

fywd (d – 0.5 hf ) fywd

6

4. Beams

Figure 14

the interface of the flange and web can be resisted by the transverse Procedure for determining longitudinal shear capacity of flanged beams

reinforcement in the flange. The position of the neutral axis should

be determined, and then the area of reinforcement can be calculated

Calculate the longitudinal shear stress

depending whether it lies in the flange or web (see Figure 11). from: vEd = D Fd/(hf D x)

(see Figure 13)

should be distributed across the full width of the effective flange as

Determine the concrete

shown in Figure 12. The span-to-depth deflection checks using ratio of Is length of Yes strut capacity from Table 8

flange under consideration

tension reinforcement should be based on area of concrete above in tension?

or from:

vRd = 0.16 fck (1 – fck/250)

centre of tension steel.

No

Longitudinal shear

The shear stress in the vertical plane between the flange and web should Determine the concrete strut capacity

from Table 8 or from:

be assessed according to section 6.2.4 and Figure 6.7 of the Eurocode vRd = 0.195 fck (1 – fck/250)

(reproduced here as Figure 13). The change in force in the flange can

be assessed from the moment and lever arm at a particular location.

The Eurocode states that the maximum length that can be considered Determine y f from:

No No

for the change in force is half the distance between the maximum

moment and the point where the moment is zero. Clearly, the maximum

Is v RD > vEd ?

yf = 0.5 sin-1 [ vEd

0.2 fck (1 – fck /250) ] Is v RD > vEd ?

longitudinal force will occur where the change in moment, and Yes (cot y f = 2.5) Yes (cot y f

= 2.0)

therefore force, is the greatest; for a uniformly distributed load on a

Calculate area of transverse reinforcement from:

continuous beam this will be the length of beam closest to the support. Asf vEd hf

=

s fyd cot y f

Figure 14 shows a flow chart for assessing the longitudinal shear

capacity; in many cases the transverse reinforcement in the slab will be

sufficient to resist the shear force. This check is included to ensure that Table 8

where particularly thin flanges are used there is adequate reinforcement. Concrete strut capacity for longitudinal shear in flanged beams

The longitudinal shear capacity is based on the variable strut inclination fck v Rd,max (when cot y = 2.5)

method, which was described in the section on vertical shear. Flange in tension Flange in compression

20 2.94 3.59

25 3.60 4.39

Rules for spacing and 28

30

3.98

4.22

4.85

5.15

quantity of reinforcement 32

35

4.46

4.82

5.44

5.87

40 5.38 6.55

Minimum area of longitudinal reinforcement 45 5.90 7.20

50 6.40 7.80

The minimum area of reinforcement is As,min = 0.26 fc tm b t d/fy k but

not less than 0.0013b td, where b t is the mean width of the tension

zone (see Table 6). For a T-beam with the flange in compression, only

the width of the web is taken into account in calculating the value of b t.

The maximum area of tension or compression reinforcement, outside

lap locations should not exceed As,max = 0.04 Ac

The minimum clear distance between bars should be the greater of:

■ Bar diameter

■ Aggregate size plus 5 mm

■ 20 mm

7

4. Beams

Selected symbols

Symbol Definition Value Symbol Definition Value

Ac Cross sectional area of concrete lo Distance between points of zero moment

As Area of tension steel l/d Span-to-depth ratio

As2 Area of compression steel M Design moment at the ULS

As, prov Area of tension steel provided x Depth to neutral axis (d-z)/0.4

As, req’d Area of tension steel required xmax Limiting value for depth to neutral axis (d – 0.4)d where d ≤1.0

beff Effective flange width z Lever arm

bt Mean width of the tension zone a cc Coefficient taking account of long term 0.85 for flexure and

effects on compressive strength and of axial loads

bmin Width of beam or rib

unfavourable effects resulting from the 1.0 for other phenomena

bw Width of section, or width of web on flanged beams way load is applied (From UK National Annex)

d Effective depth d Ratio of the redistributed moment to the

d2 Effective depth to compression reinforcement elastic bending moment

fcd Design value of concrete compressive strength acc fck /gc for fck ≤ C50/60 gm Partial factor for material properties 1.15 for reinforcement (gs)

1.5 for concrete (gc)

fck Characteristic cylinder strength of concrete

r0 Reference reinforcement ratio Rfck /1000

fctm Mean value of axial tensile strength 0.30 fck(2/3) for fck ≤ C50/60

(from Table 3.1, Eurocode 2) r Required tension reinforcement at mid-span As/bd

to resist the moment due to the design

hf Flange thickness loads (or at support for cantilevers)

K Factor to take account of the different See table NA.4 in r’ Required compression reinforcement at As2/bd

structural systems UK National Annex mid-span to resist the moment due to the

leff Effective span of member See Section 5.3.2.2 (1) design loads (or at support for cantilevers)

References

1 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS EN 1992–1–1, Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures – Part 1–1 General rules and rules for

buildings. BSI, 2004.

2 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS 8110–1: The structural use of concrete – Part 1, Code of practice for design and construction. BSI, 1997.

3 NARAYANAN, R S & BROOKER, O. How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2: Introduction to Eurocodes. The Concrete Centre, 2005.

4 BROOKER, O. How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2: Getting started. The Concrete Centre, 2005.

5 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS EN 1992–1–2, Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures. General rules – structural fire design. BSI, 2004

6 WEBSTER, R & BROOKER, O. How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2: Deflection. The Concrete Centre, 2006.

■ Guides in this series cover: Introduction to Eurocodes, Getting started, Slabs, Beams, Columns, Foundations, Flat slabs and Deflection. For free

downloads, details of other publications and more information on Eurocode 2 visit www.eurocode2.info

■ This guide is taken from The Concrete Centre’s publication, How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2 (Ref. CCIP-006)

■ For information on all the new Eurocodes visit www.eurocodes.co.uk

Acknowledgements

The content of this publication was produced as part of the project ‘Eurocode 2: transition from UK to European concrete design standards’. This

project was part funded by the DTI under the Partners in Innovation scheme. The lead partner was the British Cement Association. The work was

carried out under the guidance of the Concrete Industry Eurocode 2 Group, which consists of representatives from:

Alan Baxter and Associates • Arup • British Cement Association • British Precast • Building Research Establishment • Clark Smith Partnership •

Concrete Innovation and Design • Construct • Department for Trade and Industry • Office of the Deputy Prime Minister • The Concrete Centre •

The Concrete Society • Quarry Products Association.

For more information on Eurocode 2 and

other questions relating to the design, use Riverside House, 4 Meadows Business Park,

and performance of concrete contact the Station Approach, Blackwater, Camberley,

National Helpline on: Surrey GU17 9AB

Fax: +44 (0)1276 606801

helpline@concretecentre.com

www.concretecentre.com

Ref: TCC/03/19 All advice or information from The Concrete Centre is intended for those who will evaluate the significance and limitations of its

contents and take responsibility for its use and application. No liability (including that for negligence) for any loss resulting from such

ISBN 1-904818-29-3 advice or information is accepted by The Concrete Centre or its subcontractors, suppliers or advisors. Readers should note that

publications from The Concrete Centre are subject to revision from time to time and they should therefore ensure that they are in

Published February 2006

possession of the latest version. This publication has been produced following a contract placed by the Department for Trade and

© The Concrete CentreTM Industry (DTI); the views expressed are not necessarily those of the DTI.

- Design Examples to EurocodeDiunggah olehdonsoly
- Ccip Worked Examples Ec2Diunggah olehHerrMeier4221
- Design Aids EuroCodeDiunggah olehprakashcg123
- Worked Examples Ec2 Def080723Diunggah olehdan_ospir
- eurocode 4Diunggah olehsélem Az
- Eurocode Example Load CombinationsDiunggah olehRobert Ellul
- Examples Eurocode2Diunggah olehcitizenkaneg
- How to Design Concrete Structures Using Eurocode 2Diunggah olehAdil Javed Chaudhary
- How to Design Beams With Eurocode 2Diunggah olehIoan Sosa
- Eurocode 2 - BeamsDiunggah olehmm507
- Worked Example to Eurocode 2 Vol. 1Diunggah olehvbisketi
- Eurocode Load Combinations for Steel Structures 2010Diunggah olehAram Chtchyan
- Eurocode Guide - OnlineDiunggah olehOlynn Arifuddin
- Worked Examples to Eurocode 2Diunggah olehamin66932250
- Structrual Concrete Design to Eurocode 2 University Of Sheffield Structural Engineering MastersDiunggah olehfatabass
- EC3 & EC4 Worked ExamplesDiunggah olehplienovyras
- Designers’ guide to EN 1994-1-1 Composite Steel and ConcreteDiunggah olehLuis Sequeira
- Integral Concrete Bridges to Eurocode 2Diunggah olehRm1262
- CFD-Eurocode-2-2004Diunggah olehbookssearcher
- Designers Guide to EN1991!1!2, 1992-1-2, 1993-1-2 and 1994-1-2 Handbook for Fire DesignDiunggah olehJon Wong
- DesignersHandbookToEurocode2_Pages1_113Diunggah olehPetko Petkov
- Concise Eurocode 2Diunggah olehNishani Sandamalika
- Designers’ Guide to Eurocode 1 - Actions on BridgesDiunggah olehalbsteinpor
- steel_designDiunggah olehAdrian Pislaru
- Design of Columns to EurocodeDiunggah olehKasun Karunaratne
- ETABS 9.7Diunggah olehyohanes
- Designers' Guide to Eurocode 8 Design of Bridges for Earthquake Resistance (Designers' Guides to the Eurocodes)Diunggah olehPomija
- Concise Eurocode 2Diunggah olehtadesse1
- Structural Design Eurocodes 2009Diunggah olehshuxin24

- Polymer.pdfDiunggah olehSurendra Elayathamby
- Polymer.pdfDiunggah olehSurendra Elayathamby
- PolymerDiunggah olehSurendra Elayathamby
- SCA Building Vol 11Diunggah olehSurendra Elayathamby
- PE Pipes, Fittings, Specials & Accessories for Sewerage ApplicationDiunggah olehSurendra Elayathamby
- VERIFICACIÓN POR CORTE.pdfDiunggah olehTUAMIGOVANCITO
- Tanzania_Laboratory Testing Manual (2000)Diunggah olehSurendra Elayathamby
- Bell Amphibious ExcavatorsDiunggah olehSurendra Elayathamby
- LABOR LAWDiunggah olehtimam
- 17150 Submission of as-Built Drawings for 'E' Type Culvert Crossings at Parantha-Poonagary LineDiunggah olehSurendra Elayathamby
- Ictad Book No (Ictad-Dev-17)-Site InvestigationDiunggah olehSurendra Elayathamby
- Ductile Iron Pipe Installation Guide 05 2015Diunggah olehMahmoud Alsuradi
- RectangularTanks 25-3-2015Diunggah olehSurendra Elayathamby
- Correct Your English Errors (2nd Ed) 2017Diunggah olehFrancyMungedi
- Dip Bridge CrossingsDiunggah olehsofianina05
- Pipeline Maker Tape.pdfDiunggah olehSurendra Elayathamby
- PDR Report - Cover RC031210[1]Diunggah olehSurendra Elayathamby
- PDR Report - Cover RC031210[1]Diunggah olehSurendra Elayathamby
- DI-Pipes & FittingsDiunggah olehSurendra Elayathamby
- pipe catlouge.pdfDiunggah olehJagdish Shrestha
- Laboratory Testing Manual (2000).pdfDiunggah olehandressaoliveira2301
- s.s. Ray-reinforced Concrete Analysis and DesignDiunggah olehSurendra Elayathamby
- Prestressed-Concrete-Krishnaraju.pdfDiunggah olehSurendra Elayathamby
- Timber works.pdfDiunggah olehSurendra Elayathamby
- Kilinochchi Tender Price Schedule - Final[1]Diunggah olehSurendra Elayathamby
- Draft Pdr Report Annexs Rc141210[1]Diunggah olehSurendra Elayathamby
- ImationLOCKv20-E Manual.pdfDiunggah olehRaul Cuayla
- Cube_Strength.pdfDiunggah olehSurendra Elayathamby
- 00_施工監理計画書_2013 July.docDiunggah olehSurendra Elayathamby
- DI-Pipes & FittingsDiunggah olehIsuru Deshan Wijewardana

- 03 Presentazione Codice Ansys SattaminoDiunggah olehnarender_kumar
- Voulme-1-Hydraulic-Presses-Design-of-Press-Body.pdfDiunggah olehStephane Durel Mbida
- pp-rcd-usd-tDiunggah olehJustinne Cas
- Group4_ProblemSet1Diunggah olehMatthew Carandang
- qqqDiunggah olehheherson juan
- Mechanics Cw 3Diunggah oleh0808276k
- E-TN-CBD-AISC-LRFD93-002.pdfDiunggah olehOswaldo Saavedra Bayona
- Tehnical sheets for hardoxxDiunggah olehZeu Aress
- Civil Paper 1Diunggah oleh9290010274
- Design Aid for Composite ColumnsDiunggah olehNikkiPopa
- Timoshenko vs Euler-Bernoulli Beam- Fractional Visco-elastic BehaviorDiunggah olehpraveenpinnoji
- Hollowblock slabs.pdfDiunggah olehFractos
- Steel Structures Design Based on Eurocode 3 (2018, Springer Singapore).pdfDiunggah olehMini Rambo
- SFD-AISC-360-05Diunggah olehScribdmarific
- BEeM 101.01Diunggah olehAnonymous I8nZsDqlmh
- MS1241-91Diunggah olehHanizam Sulaiman
- StaadPRODiunggah olehThomas John Doblas Agrabio
- PscDiunggah olehhuzefahussain745
- EVERYTHING ABOUT GATEDiunggah olehtigersayooj
- Limit State.xls.Diunggah olehSubbarao Kakumanu
- Enercalcs BEam W10x15 Check Calcs PropertiesDiunggah olehManoj Jaiswal
- IS 9178 (Part 1) - 1978Diunggah olehbhustlero0o
- COMMNETS-Towards a Consistent Design of Structural ConcreteDiunggah olehLiang Shi
- Syllabus.pdfDiunggah olehNasir
- chenDiunggah olehStevie Chandra
- Review of AISI Design Guide for Cold-Formed Steel Purlin Roof Framing SystemsDiunggah olehapirakq
- Raft FoundationsDiunggah olehjosem_rojasc
- Lecture 30 and 31Diunggah oleharjun505
- 7_portal_frames_warwick_banks.pdfDiunggah olehAliasTT
- Rumus.pdfDiunggah olehAri Wibowo Nugroho