Austin ISD Community Meeting # 3 Options Handout

R
RD ANDERSON MILL RD IL D HO
NE WA
69 US MC
5
RD
27
68
HW LA
12.4
M HO
FM
F Y
18 WA
3 RD
LA
THERMAL DR
Assign the remaining 2008
RD
N ET
PA
undesignated ES to north
BU L
R ME
AD
BU R
RL
JO
LIC
A
RO
LL
central (in addition to 2004
KH
YV
AU
IL
DU
OL L
_
^ _
^
SS
LE
VA
L
Bond Program ES)
DE
RD
RD
PA
OW
R ME
R
RD
YA
RD
G ER
PAR
VD
BR LA
AU
AK
BL
ER
SS
M
LA
RIC
ER
0 RD
DE
F M 62
LA
ME
F
M
22
22
RD _
^ PA
ET RD
R ME
_
^ _
^ R
LA
_^_
BURN
^ RU
ND _
^
BE
RG
_
^ LA
D
R
_
^ ^
_
K
R
NO
RD
_
^
PA
8.2 B
RT AN
HL _
^
N
AN DE
ON
LA
DD RS
ON
IN
R
Pearce MS
^^
_ _
^
U
LA
ME
_
^
Q
_ _
^
CA
US
HW
WY
Y1 FE
DR
RG
SH
83 US
_
^
ES
_
^ _
^ ON
XA
D
LA
ON
0R
TE
_
^
62
LC
OF
_
^ KO
BA
FM
D
EN
AL
LV
IG _
^
LA _
^ US HW Y 290
MO-PAC EXPY
PIT
RB
_
^
3.6
CA
MA
_ ^
^ _
LA
RD
RD
_
^
Pease ES
OR
BURNET
51S
N
TS
T _
^
MA
45
TH
ST
^ _
_ ^ ^ ^
_ _
^
_
BLVD
51
G
_
^ ST
LO
ST
ST
D
YO
ST 4R
NE
2 24 _
^
T
AT
IO N
LA
PE
RS
E FM
LA
4.4B
HW
_
^ _
^
LA
_
^
LU
Y7
O SIT
IVE
^ _
_
ER
1 ^^
DA
_
3.4
CK
DR
Barton Hills ES &
A
EXP
EN
GU
DE
RE
FIE
D
LD
IN BLV
RD _
^ _
^
D
Zilker ES
26TH ST
ER
24TH ST
R RD
ESTE
AL
MANO G BLV
D FM
_
^ ER KIN
GD
9 69
N LUTH
MARTI _
^
RIN
ED BLU
BE 15T H
E _
^ _
^
SP
CA ST ST
VE _
^ 6T H
_
^ 11TH
^
_ 12TH
S ST ST
G
RD
BA
RT
_
^ 5T H
S T 7T H S T _
^ _
^ _
^
G
O
G
NS
2.2 C
_
^
AIRP
P RIN
3.9 B1
GS
^
_
S AV
RD
ORT
CE
_
^ SAR _
^
Joslin ES
CH _
^
S
Ortega ES
AVE ^
_
_
^
GRE
BLVD
T ZS
_ ^
_
G
TS
T ^
_
^ RI _
^
G
CON
VE
1S
^
_
G
D
_
^ RS
3R
SO
_
^ ID
G
UT E
HW
97
ES DR
FM
TP
BA
3.9 B2
KW ^
_
ST
Y
_
^
RO
DR
OL RIV
Oak Springs ES
TO
PH
_
^ ^
_ RF ER _
^
LI S
ST SI D
_
^
WY
2 90 _
^ ED
PO
D
HW Y
US ^^
_ R
BLV
FIT _
T
TO
ZH ^
_
TS
UG _
^ _
^ RI
N
VE
ATE
HR
1S
MO
G
D _
^ RS
ID
TG
_
^ E
LA
DR
S
IE
3.9 A
BEN W HI
WE
OD
TE BLVD
BR
_
^ TO ST
D
_^ Brooke ES
_
^ ^ _ DL
A
AT
E HW
_
^ ST
AS
Y7
1
_
^ SN
EY
_
^ LA _
^ BU
R
3.9 C
WIL_
^ _
^ LE
RD
L SO
_
^ _
^ IAM
CA
D
N
26
NN
AR
SH ON R
16.2 Sanchez ES
18
45 DR D
_
^ ^^
__
AC
_
^
FM
_
^
CHN
_
^
MA
NU
_
^ _
^ IC LO
OP
TT
_
^ SC EN
YB
_
^
SLAUG HTER LA
0.19
RO
WN
RD _
^
New High School
26
RD
18
D
_
^ _
^ _
^
3R
M
F
(land funded in previous

97
FM
_
^
bond program)
9 73
_
^
FM
_
^
FM 1626
_
^
0.18
D
3R
New Middle School

97
FM
5
IH-3
(land funded in previous

bond program)
US HWY 183
FM
FM
13
96
27
7
0.17
Three new undesignated
elementary schools in
future bond program
FM 1626
AISD Facility Master Plan Task Force

Options for Community Meetings - January 12 & 13, 2011
FACILITY MASTER PLAN OPTIONS – COMMUNITY MEETINGS JANUARY 12 & 13, 2011
OPTION 2.2 C:
Close Joslin ES and reassign student population into Sunset Valley ES. Reassign a portion of the Sunset Valley
student population into Boone ES and Cunningham ES to balance utilization.
Background
• Total population for Joslin, Sunset Valley, Boone and Cunningham attendance zones is 1,936 students.
• Total capacity of four schools is 2,314 elementary students, leaving an excess of 378 seats.
• Current boundaries result in a projected percent of population for the 2014-15 school year of:
o 95% - Joslin ES
o 67% - Boone ES
o 104% - Cunningham ES
o 97% - Sunset Valley ES
Rationale
• Joslin ES has a permanent capacity of 374 students, the lowest of the four schools.
• Joslin ES has a Facility Condition Index (FCI) of 44.1%, similar to Cunningham and Sunset Valley ES. Boone
ES has a low FCI of 17.4%
Impact
• An estimated 475 students would be affected by this proposal.
• An estimated annual savings of $1,266,595 and an estimated capital cost avoidance of $8,466,116
could be realized.
• The proposed option would result in a projected percent of population for the 2014-15 school year of:
o 88% - Boone ES
o 117% - Cunningham ES
o 118% - Sunset Valley ES
Existing Boundaries Proposed Boundaries
Advantages
• Annual cost savings and capital cost Disadvantages
avoidance
• Affects a large number of students and
families due to the need to also move
Sunset Valley students to Boone and
Cunningham
• Sunset Valley and Cunningham over-
capacity by 2014-15 school year
1
OPTION 2.2 C:
School Name Action

Boone ES Receive students from Sunset Valley
Cunningham ES Receive students from Sunset Valley
Joslin ES Close Joslin and reassign student population to Sunset Valley
Receive students from Joslin and reassign a portion of student population to Boone ES
Sunset Valley ES and Cunningham ES
Current
2014 2014
Perm. Net. Migr. 2009 % 2009 % Proj. % Proj. %
FCI School Name Cap. Fact. Enroll. Cap. Pop. Cap. Enroll. Cap. Pop. Cap.
17.4% Boone ES 752 0.0121 502 67% 496 66% 510 68% 504 67%
39.4% Cunningham ES 627 (0.1250) 553 88% 632 101% 568 91% 649 104%
44.1% Joslin ES 374 0.0382 326 87% 314 84% 371 99% 357 95%
41.1% Sunset Valley ES 561 (0.0628) 463 83% 494 88% 508 91% 542 97%
2,314 1,844 1,936 1,957 2,052
Proposed
2014 2014
Perm. Net. Migr. 2009 % 2009 % Proj. % Proj. % Students
FCI School Name Cap. Fact. Enroll. Cap. Pop. Cap. Enroll. Cap. Pop. Cap. Affected
17.4% Boone ES 752 0.0121 654 87% 646 86% 667 89% 659 88% 0
39.4% Cunnigham ES 627 (0.1250) 615 98% 703 112% 640 102% 731 117% 0
0.0% Joslin ES 0 0.0000 - 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 314
41.1% Sunset Valley ES 561 (0.0628) 550 98% 587 105% 620 111% 662 118% 161
1,940 1,819 1,936 1,927 2,052 475
Cost or Savings Categories Amount Yrs Extended Includes

Operational Savings $519,359 10 $5,193,590 M&O, Food Service, Equip., etc.
Salaries and Benefits Savings $761,432 10 $7,614,320 Admin., Clerical, Custodial, etc.
Moving Costs ($14,196) 1 ($14,196) Associated with closure
Transportation $0 10 $0 No new routes required
Total $1,266,595 $12,793,714
Capital Cost Avoidance Amount

Deficiencies 1 - 5 for Joslin $ 8,466,116
Total $ 8,466,116
Future Bond Impact Amount

$ -
Total $0
2
OPTION 3.6:
Close Pease ES and reassign student population to home elementary school.

Background
• Pease ES has no attendance zone; it is an all transfer school.
• Total capacity of Pease is 293 elementary students; it is not cost effective to operate.
Rationale
• Pease ES has a Facility Condition Index (FCI) of 71.9%, the highest in the District.
Impact
• An estimated annual savings of $712,296 and an estimated capital cost avoidance of $7,668,770 could
be realized.
Advantages Disadvantages
• Not a neighborhood school, students could • Historic building.
return to home school or request a transfer • Diverse enrollment
to another school
• A relatively small number of students and
families affected
• Highest FCI in the District
• Not cost effective to operate
3
OPTION 3.6:
School Name Action

Pease ES Close
Current
2014 2014
71.9% Pease ES 293 1.0000 252 86% 0 0% 300 103% 0 0%
293 252 0 300 0
Proposed
2014 2014
71.9% Pease ES 0 1.0000 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 252

Total $712,296 $7,302,501

Deficiencies 1 - 5 for Pease $ 7,668,770
Total $ 7,668,770

$ -
Total $0
4
OPTION 3.9 A:
Close Brooke ES and reassign student population into Zavala ES and Allan ES. Reassign a portion of the Allan ES
student population into Norman ES to balance utilization.
Background
• Total population for Brooke, Zavala, Allan and Norman ES attendance zones is 1,524 students.
o 110% - Brooke ES
o 56% - Zavala ES
o 56% - Allan ES
o 74% - Norman ES
Rationale
• Brooke ES has a permanent capacity of 430 students, the lowest of the four schools.
• Brooke ES has a Facility Condition Index (FCI) of 32.6%, which is comparable to the other three schools.
Impact
could be realized.
o 104% - Zavala ES
o 82% - Allan ES
o 79% - Norman ES
Advantages
• Annual savings and cost avoidance from Disadvantages
closing Brooke ES
• Brooke ES students south of Town Lake still
• Improves percent of capacity at Allan ES
bused long distances. (could be resolved if
and Zavala ES within target range
3.9 C were approved)
• Slightly improves Norman ES percent of
• Affects a relatively large number of students
capacity
and families
5
OPTION 3.9 A:
School Name Action

Brooke ES Close and reassign student population to Zavala and Allan
Zavala ES Receive students from Brooke ES
Allan ES Receive students from Brooke ES
Norman ES Receive students from Allan ES
Current 3.9a
2014 2014
32.6% Brooke ES 430 (0.0579) 423 98% 449 104% 445 103% 472 110%
31.2% Zavala ES 580 0.1062 375 65% 339 58% 361 62% 326 56%
32.1% Allan ES 673 0.1011 392 58% 356 53% 416 62% 378 56%
32.2% Norman ES 486 (0.1421) 326 67% 380 78% 310 64% 361 74%
2,169 1,516 1,524 1,531 1,537
Proposed 3.9a
2014 2014
0.0% Brooke ES 0 (0.0579) - 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 469
31.2% Zavala ES 580 0.1062 632 109% 571 98% 665 115% 601 104% 0
32.1% Allan ES 673 0.1011 631 94% 573 85% 606 90% 550 82% 0
32.2% Norman ES 486 (0.1421) 326 67% 380 78% 331 68% 386 79% 0
1,253 1,263 1,144 1,270 1,151 469

Transportation $0 10 $0 TBD
Total $1,301,382 $13,312,674

Deficiencies 1 - 5 for Brooke $ 5,477,387
$ 5,477,387
6
OPTION 3.9 B 1:
Close Ortega ES and reassign student population into Govalle ES.

Background
• Total population for Ortega and Govalle ES attendance zones is 713 students.
• Total capacity of the schools is 972 elementary students, leaving an excess of 259 seats.
o 74% - Ortega ES
o 80% - Govalle ES
Rationale
• Ortega ES has a permanent capacity of 374 students, the lower of the two schools.
• Ortega ES has a Facility Condition Index (FCI) of 40.2%, which is slightly higher than Govalle ES.
Impact
could be realized.
o 126% - Govalle ES
• Small number of students and families • Govalle ES reaches 126% of permanent
affected capacity by 2014-15 school year.
• Ortega ES has a high FCI
• Moves Ortega intact to Govalle
• Ortega and Govalle are within 2 miles of
one another
• Annual savings and cost avoidance
7
OPTION 3.9 B 1:
School Name Action

Ortega ES Close and reassign student population to Govalle ES
Govalle ES Receive students from Ortega ES
Current 3.9b
2014 2014
40.2% Ortega ES 374 0.0875 286 76% 263 70% 300 80% 276 74%
36.1% Govalle ES 598 (0.1244) 394 66% 450 75% 419 70% 478 80%
972 680 713 719 754
2014 2014
0.0% Ortega ES 374 0.0875 - 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 263
36.1% Govalle ES 598 (0.1244) 624 104% 713 119% 660 110% 754 126% 0
972 624 713 660 754 263

Total $1,153,873 $11,777,131

Deficiencies 1 - 5 for Ortega $ 6,082,090
Total $ 6,082,090

$ -
Total $0
8
OPTION 3.9 B 2:
Close Oak Springs ES and reassign student population into Blackshear ES.
Background
• Total population for Oak Springs and Blackshear ES attendance zones is 591students.
• Total capacity of the schools is 1,010 elementary students, leaving an excess of 419 seats.
o 88% - Oak Springs ES
o 44% - Blackshear ES
Rationale
• Oak Springs ES has a permanent capacity of 411 students, the lower of the two schools.
• Oak Springs ES has a Facility Condition Index (FCI) of 26.5%, which is lower than Blackshear ES at 34.7%.
Impact
could be realized.
o 105% - Blackshear ES
• Blackshear ES percent of capacity within • Parent involvement could be more difficult
target range • Longer walk to school
• Annual cost savings and capital avoidance
• Moves Oak Springs intact to Blackshear
9
OPTION 3.9 B 2:
School Name Action

Oak Springs ES Close and reassign student population to Blackshear ES
Blackshear ES Receive students from Oak Springs ES and Govalle ES
Current 3.9b
2014 2014
26.5% Oak Springs ES 411 (0.0744) 311 76% 336 82% 337 82% 364 88%
34.7% Blackshear ES 598 (0.0627) 239 40% 255 43% 248 42% 265 44%
1,010 550 591 585 629
2014 2014
0.0% Oak Springs ES 411 (0.0744) - 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 336
34.7% Blackshear ES 598 (0.0627) 554 93% 591 99% 590 99% 629 105% 0
1,010 554 591 590 629 336

Transportation $0 10 $0 TBD
Total $1,146,969 $11,707,965

Deficiencies 1 - 5 for Oak Springs $ 4,225,932
Total $ 4,225,932

$ -
Total $0
10
OPTION 3.9 C:
Close Sanchez ES and reassign students north of Town Lake to Zavala and Metz ES. Adjust boundaries between
Linder and Zavala ES (or Brooke ES if 3.9 A were not approved), and between Mathews and Zavala ES. Build a
new 800-student elementary school south of Town Lake to receive students from Sanchez, Metz and Travis
Heights ES
Background
• Total population for Sanchez, Metz, Zavala, Linder, Travis Heights, and Mathews attendance zones is
3,377 students.
• Total capacity of the schools is 3,559 elementary students, leaving an excess of 187 seats. Closing
Sanchez and constructing a new elementary school would increase the capacity to 3,780 seats.
o 100% - Sanchez ES o 125% - Linder ES
o 89% - Metz ES o 126% - Travis Heights ES
o 104% - Zavala ES o 81% - Mathews ES
Rationale
• Sanchez ES has a permanent capacity of 580 students.
• Sanchez ES has a Facility Condition Index (FCI) of 26.8%.
Impact
• An estimated 1,080 students would be affected by this proposal.
could be realized.
o 100% - New Elementary o 98% - Linder Early Childhood
o 55% - Metz ES o 109% - Travis Heights ES
o 71% - Zavala ES o 71% - Mathews ES
o 97% - Linder ES
• Students south of Town Lake would attend a • Requires construction of new elementary
school in their immediate neighborhood. school in future bond program
• Provides some relief for Linder and Travis • Results in Metz, Zavala and Mathews under
Heights ES capacity in 2014-15 school year.
11
OPTION 3.9 C:
School Name Action

Build a new 800 student elementary school to receive students from Linder, Travis Heights,
New Elementary Sanchez and Metz ES (South of river)
Travis Heights ES Reassign a portion of student population (East of I-35) to New ES
Close and reassign student population to New ES (South of river), Metz ES (between river
Sanchez ES and Cesar Chavez) and Zavala ES (between Cesar Chavez and East 11th St.)
Metz ES Reassign a portion of student population (South of river) to New ES
Receive students from Sanchez and Metz (South of river) and Mathews ES
Zavala ES (East of I-35)
Mathews ES Reassign a portion of students (East of I-35) to Zavala ES
Linder Early Child. Continue to receive Linder PK and K students
Linder ES Receive students from Zavala ES (along Pleasant Valley Rd.)
2014 2014
0.0% New Elementary 0 0.0000 - 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
36.4% Travis Heights ES 486 (0.0504) 528 109% 556 114% 584 120% 615 126%
26.8% Sanchez ES 580 0.0833 611 105% 564 97% 627 108% 579 100%
29.5% Metz ES 542 0.0229 492 91% 481 89% 495 91% 484 89%
31.2% Zavala ES 580 0.1062 632 109% 571 98% 665 115% 601 104%
31.8% Mathews ES 397 0.2007 359 90% 299 75% 385 97% 321 81%
0.0% Linder Early Child. 432 0.0000 - 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
19.7% Linder ES 542 (0.0706) 842 155% 906 167% 628 116% 676 125%
3,559 3,464 3,377 3,385 3,276
2014 2014
0.0% New Elementary 800 0.0000 722 90% 722 90% 800 100% 800 100% 0
36.4% Travis Heights ES 486 (0.0504) 464 96% 489 101% 505 104% 532 109% 67
26.8% Sanchez ES 0 0.0833 - 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 564
29.5% Metz ES 542 0.0229 330 61% 323 60% 307 57% 300 55% 158
31.2% Zavala ES 580 0.1062 503 87% 455 78% 457 79% 413 71% 116
31.8% Mathews ES 397 0.2007 300 76% 250 63% 336 85% 280 71% 49
0.0% Linder Early Child. 432 0.0000 358 83% 358 83% 425 98% 425 98% 0
19.7% Linder ES 542 (0.0706) 725 134% 780 144% 489 90% 526 97% 126
3,780 3,403 3,377 3,319 3,276 1,080

Transportation 10 $0 Savings TBD
Total $1,556,924 $15,728,945

Deficiencies 1 - 5 for Sanchez $ 9,424,688
Total $ 9,424,688

New Elementary 2 $ 28,100,000
Total $28,100,000
*land costs not included
12
OPTION 4.4 B:
Close Barton Hills and Zilker ES and reassign student population into Becker and Dawson ES.
Background
• Total population for Barton Hills, Zilker, Becker and Dawson attendance zones is 1,006 students.
o 77% - Barton Hills ES
o 79% - Zilker ES
o 44% - Becker ES
o 52% - Dawson ES
Rationale
• Barton Hills ES has a permanent capacity of 251 students, the lowest of the four schools. It is not cost
effective to operate. Zilker ES has a permanent capacity of 460 students.
• Barton Hills ES has a Facility Condition Index (FCI) of 33.5%, similar to Becker and Dawson. Zilker ES has
an FCI of 55.0%, the third highest in the District.
Impact
could be realized.
o 107% - Becker ES
o 96% - Dawson ES
• Improves percent of capacity for Becker • Students from Barton Hills and Zilker will need
and Dawson to cross Lamar Blvd. to attend Becker or
• Not cost effective to operate Barton Hills ES Dawson.
• Zilker ES has high FCI
• High in-migration at both schools, area
population does not support either schools
13
OPTION 4.4 B:
School Name Action

Becker ES Receive students from Barton Hills and a portion of student from Zilker (82B)
Dawson ES Receive students from Zilker (82A and 82C)
Barton Hills ES Close Barton Hills and reassign student population to Becker
Zilker ES Close Zilker and reassign student population to Dawson and Becker
Current
2014 2014
37.1% Becker ES 524 (0.0935) 194 37% 214 41% 207 39% 228 44%
27.0% Dawson ES 505 0.2007 335 66% 279 55% 313 62% 261 52%
33.5% Barton Hills ES 251 0.8859 347 138% 184 73% 366 146% 194 77%
55.0% Zilker ES 460 0.5927 524 114% 329 72% 580 126% 364 79%
1,739 1,400 1,006 1,466 1,047
Proposed
2014 2014
37.1% Becker ES 524 (0.0935) 467 89% 515 98% 509 97% 561 107% 0%
27.0% Dawson ES 505 0.2007 590 117% 491 97% 584 116% 486 96% 0%
0.0% Barton Hills ES 0 0.0000 - 0% - 0% - 0% - 0% 184
0.0% Zilker ES 0 0.5927 - 0% - 0% - 0% - 0% 329
1,029 1,056 1,006 1,092 1,047 513

Salaries and Benefits Savings $1,524,470 10 $15,244,700 Admin., Clerical, Custodial, etc.
Total $2,266,637 $22,959,986

Deficiencies 1 - 5 for Barton Hills $ 4,894,150
Deficiencies 1 - 5 for Zilker $ 12,649,785
Total $17,543,935

$ -
Total $0
14
OPTION 8.2 B:
Close Pearce MS and reassign student population into Garcia and Webb MS. Reassign a portion of the Webb
MS student population into Dobie MS to balance utilization.
Background
• Total population for Pearce, Garcia, Webb and Dobie MS attendance zones is 2,885 students.
• Total capacity of four schools is 3,998 middle school students, leaving an excess of 1,113 seats.
o 71% - Pearce MS
o 73% - Garcia MS
o 104% - Webb MS
o 90% - Dobie MS
Rationale
• Pearce MS has a permanent capacity of 1,078 student, Webb and Dobie both have capacities under
1,000.
• Pearce MS has a low Facility Condition Index (FCI) of 15.2%, all middle schools in the area have low FCIs,
the highest being Webb at 25.1%.
Impact
could be realized.
o 88% - Garcia MS
o 121% - Webb MS
o 140% - Dobie MS
• Annual cost savings and capital avoidance • Longer travel distances for some students
• Because Pearce 6th grade students are • Pearce MS community investment in an
currently attending home elementary Early College Prep School.
school, this option would only affect the
current 7th grade class attending Pearce,
approximately 159 students
15
OPTION 8.2 B:
School Name Action

Pearce MS Close and reassign student population to Garcia, and Webb
Garcia MS Receive students from Pearce
Webb MS Receive students from Pearce and reassign a portion of student population to Dobie
Dobie MS Receive students from Webb
Current
Net. 2014 2014
Perm. Migr. 2009 % 2009 % Proj. % Proj. %
15.2% Pearce MS 1,078 (0.3382) 452 42% 683 63% 505 47% 763 71%
4.7% Garcia MS 1,215 (0.1398) 689 57% 801 66% 761 63% 885 73%
25.1% Webb MS 804 (0.1720) 573 71% 692 86% 693 86% 837 104%
15.7% Dobie MS 902 (0.1495) 603 67% 709 79% 689 76% 810 90%
3,998 2,317 2,885 2,648 3,295
Proposed
Net. 2014 2014
Perm. Migr. 2009 % 2009 % Proj. % Proj. % Students
0.0% Pearce MS 1,078 0.0000 - 0% - 0% - 0% - 0% 683
4.7% Garcia MS 1,215 (0.1398) 839 69% 975 80% 919 76% 1,068 88% 0
25.1% Webb MS 804 (0.1720) 691 86% 835 104% 803 100% 970 121% 0
15.7% Dobie MS 902 (0.1495) 914 101% 1,075 119% 1,072 119% 1,260 140% 0
3,998 2,444 2,885 2,793 3,298 683

Salaries and Benefits Savings $1,477,480 10 $14,774,800 Admin., Clerical, Custodial, etc.
Transportation ($244,060) 10 ($2,440,600) Additional routes required
Total $1,881,140 $19,419,062

Deficiencies for Pearce MS $7,443,511
Total $7,443,511

$ -
Total $0
16
OPTION 3.4:
Reassign a portion of the Maplewood ES student population into Campbell ES to balance utilization.
Background
o 72% - Campbell ES
o 130% - Maplewood ES
Impact
o 90% - Campbell ES
o 103% - Maplewood ES
• Balances percent of capacity at both
schools
17
OPTION 3.4:
School Name Action

Campbell ES Receive students from Maplewood ES
Maplewood ES Reassign students from PA 41B and the southern portion of PA 41E to Campbell ES
Current
Net. 2014 2014
20.8% Campbell ES 524 0.0504 396 76% 377 72% 395 75% 376 72%
36.5% Maplewood ES 355 0.2848 388 109% 302 85% 592 167% 461 130%
879 784 679 987 837
Proposed
Net. 2014 2014
20.8% Campbell ES 524 0.0504 489 93% 466 89% 496 95% 472 90% 0
36.5% Maplewood ES 355 0.2848 274 77% 213 60% 469 132% 365 103% 0
879 763 679 965 837 0

Operational Savings $0 10 $0 M&O, Food Service, Equip., etc.
Salaries and Benefits Savings $0 10 $0 Admin., Clerical, Custodial, etc.
Moving Costs $0 1 $0 Associated with closure
Transportation $0 10 $0 Additional routes required
Total $0 $0

$ -
Total $0

$ -
Total $0
18
OPTION 16.2:
Reassign a portion of the Akins HS student population into Crockett HS to balance utilization.
Background
o 134% - Akins HS
o 91% - Crockett HS
Impact
o 125% - Akins HS
o 102% - Crockett HS
• Improves percent of capacity at both
schools
• Improves vertical alignment
19
OPTION 16.2:
School Name Action

Akins HS Reassign a portion of the student population to Crockett HS
Crockett HS Receive students from Akins HS
Current
Net. 2014 2014
6.5% Akins HS 2,394 (0.1190) 2,710 113% 3,076 128% 2,835 118% 3,218 134%
30.5% Crockett HS 2,163 (0.0851) 1,763 82% 1,927 89% 1,810 84% 1,978 91%
4,557 4,473 5,003 4,645 5,196
Proposed
Net. 2014 2014
6.5% Akins HS 2,394 (0.1190) 2,516 105% 2,856 119% 2,640 110% 3,314 138% 220
30.5% Crockett HS 2,163 (0.0851) 1,964 91% 2,147 99% 2,013 93% 1,882 87% 0
4,557 4,480 5,003 4,653 5,196 220

Operational Savings $0 10 $0 M&O, Food Service, Equip., etc.
Salaries and Benefits Savings $0 10 $0 Admin., Clerical, Custodial, etc.
Moving Costs $0 1 $0 Associated with closure
Transportation $0 10 $0 Additional routes required
Total $0 $0

$ -
Total $0

$ -
Total $0
20

Austin ISD Community Meeting # 3 Options Handout

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Austin ISD Community Meeting # 3 Options Handout

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

R

Bond Program ES)

(land funded in previous

New Middle School

(land funded in previous

AISD Facility Master Plan Task Force

School Name Action

Cost or Savings Categories Amount Yrs Extended Includes

Capital Cost Avoidance Amount

Future Bond Impact Amount

Close Pease ES and reassign student population to home elementary school.

School Name Action

Cost or Savings Categories Amount Yrs Extended Includes

Capital Cost Avoidance Amount

Future Bond Impact Amount

School Name Action

Cost or Savings Categories Amount Yrs Extended Includes

Capital Cost Avoidance Amount

Close Ortega ES and reassign student population into Govalle ES.

School Name Action

Cost or Savings Categories Amount Yrs Extended Includes

Capital Cost Avoidance Amount

Future Bond Impact Amount

School Name Action

Cost or Savings Categories Amount Yrs Extended Includes

Capital Cost Avoidance Amount

Future Bond Impact Amount

School Name Action

Cost or Savings Categories Amount Yrs Extended Includes

Capital Cost Avoidance Amount

Future Bond Impact Amount

School Name Action

Cost or Savings Categories Amount Yrs Extended Includes

Capital Cost Avoidance Amount

Future Bond Impact Amount

School Name Action

Cost or Savings Categories Amount Yrs Extended Includes

Capital Cost Avoidance Amount

Future Bond Impact Amount

School Name Action

Cost or Savings Categories Amount Yrs Extended Includes

Capital Cost Avoidance Amount

Future Bond Impact Amount

School Name Action

Cost or Savings Categories Amount Yrs Extended Includes

Capital Cost Avoidance Amount

Future Bond Impact Amount

Anda mungkin juga menyukai