Indophenol method
The indophenol solution, 0.25 g/L of 2,6 dichloroindophenol, was
60 standardized by titration with 2.0 mL of standard ascorbic acid solution
and 5 mL of 3% metaphosphoric acid-8% acetic acid solution (HPO,-
HOAc) to the end point (a persistent rosy pink color). Consumption of
the blank was determined by titrating indophenol solution with 7 mL of
HPO,-HOAC solution plus a given amount of water equivalent to the
volume of indophenol solution used in the previous standardization ti-
tration. For the sample titration, 50 rnt. of sample was mixed with an
equal volume of HPO,-HOAc solution before filtering. A volume of
filtrate equivalent to about 2 mg of ascorbic acid was then titrated with
-A- H202-NaOCI indophenol solution using the procedure described including titration of
20 \
0 - n - Methylerie blue the blank.
- l - Riboflavin
t \ Iodine method
\
I I I I
01 The iodine solution (O.OOSM)was standardized in the usual way with
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 O.OlM thiosulfate solution. For sample analysis, 5 mL of sample, 20 mL
of water and 2 mL of 1% starch solution were titrated with standardized
Time (min) iodine solution.
Fig. l-Comparison of the destruction rates of ascorbic acid by
photochemical methods of riboflavin and methylene blue, and HPLC method
chemical H202-NaOCI treatment method.
A high performance liquid chromatograph (Model 45, Waters Asso-
ciates. Milford. MA) was eouiDDedwith a UV detector (Waters Asso-
To study the destruction rates of ascorbic acid at different pH’s, 21 , 1 1*
ciate, Milford, MA) was used (Bradbury and Singh, 1986) for ascorbic
pg/mL ascorbic acid solutions containing 6 pg/mL riboflavin @ H 7.5, acid determination. The column used was jr-Bondapak C-18 (30 cm X
5.5 and 3.5) were prepared by addition of calculated amounts of ascorbic 3.9 mm, Waters Associates, Milford, MA). The mobile phase (flow rate
acid and riboflavin into 0.01 phosphate buffers of pH 7.5, 5.5 and 3.5, 1.3 mL/min) was aqueous 0.005M KH,PO, adjusted to pH 4.6 with
respectively. The content of ascorbic acid was determined by measuring dilute HCl and acetonitrile (30:70, v/v). Ten pL of sample was injected.
absorbanceof solutions at 265 nm for samples at pH 7.5 and 5.5, or at The ascorbic acid was quantitated at 265 nm by the UV detector.
245 nm for samples at pH 3.5 using a spectrophotometer.
-0- pH 7.5
9 p9r-K: -.- pH 5.5
21 pgmLl
80 -O- 35 pgml-, .-7J 20 -v- pH 3.5
-A- 63 ,ugml-, ::
-0- 105 pgml 0
.-
60 ; 40
::
0
40 ‘5 60
::
E
20 i 80
0 100
0 3 6 9 12 15 0. 3 6 9 12 15
Time (min) Time (min)
Fig. 2-Riboflavin-sensitized photooxidation of ascorbic acid Fig. 3-Riboflavin-sensitized photooxidation of ascorbic acid at
with different initial concentration during light storage. different pH during light storage.
Ascorbic acid content in commercial beverages dophenol method. The proposed method could measure ascorbic
Repeatability of the method for analysis of ascorbic acid con- acid in some colored samples such as tomato juice and grape
tents in selected commercial beverage was tested (Table 1). The juice. Ascorbic acid contents in tomato juice and grape juice
results show ~4% relative standard deviation for three samples could not be measured by AOAC indophenol method because
studied. The riboflavin sensitized photochemical method for as- of color interferences. Among the 12 tested samples, the ascor-
corbic acid contents in commercial beverages gave precise re- bic acid contents in 9 samples were successfully determined by
sults in analyzing real fruit juices and sport drink. the proposed method. However, considerable differences were
The recovery test results with known amounts of added as- observed between references and the proposed method for ac-
corbic acid in four different commercial beverages were com- erola drink, vegetable juice cocktail and apple juice. Reasons
pared (Table 2). Almost 100% recovery was shown with no for these differences are uncertain.
observed significant deviation for any of the samples tested.
To test the reliability of the method, 12 commercial beverage
samples were collected, and parallel determinations using well REFERENCES
established methods and the proposed procedure were com- AOAC 1980. Official Methods of Analysis, 13th ed. W. Horwitz (Ed.), p. 746.
Association of Official Analytical Chemists,, Washington, DC.
pared. The indophenol method has interference from colored Bodannes, R.S. and Chan, P.C. 1979. Ascorbw acid as a scavenger of singlet
samples (especially red), thus, for some samples, the second oxygen. FEBS Letters. 105: 195-196.
iodine titration method, which has less interference form colored Bradbury, J.H. and Singh, U. 1986. Ascorbic acid and dehydroascorbic
content of tropical root crops from the south pacific. 3. Food Sci. 51(4):
acid
solutions, was used. However, redox impurities can cause prob- 975-978,987.
lems in that analysis. The third HPLC method for determination Casella, L., Gullotti, M., Marchesini, A., and Petrarulo, M. 1989. Rapid en-
zymatic method for vitamin C assay in fruits and vegetables using per-
of ascorbic acid was used, but with interfering constituents, sep- oxidase. J. Food Sci. 54: 374-378.
aration of ascorbic acid was difficult in some beverages. Chou, P. and Khan, A.U. 1983. L-ascorbic acid quenching of singlet oxygen
delta molecular oxygen in aqueous media; generalized antioxidant prop-
The results with the proposed method, and the three estab- erty of vitamin C. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 115: 932-936.
lished methods were compared (Table 3). The concentration of Doner, L.W. and Hicks, K.B. 1981. High-performance liquid chromato-
graphic separation of ascorbic acid, erythorbic acid, dehydroascorbic acid,
ascorbic acid varied greatly among the different samples. The dehydroerythorbic acid, diketogluonic acid, and diketogluconic acid. Anal.
proposed method had a distinct advantage over the AOAC in- Biochem. 115: 225-230. -Continued on page 368