Section 3-2
3-1. Continuous
3-2. Discrete
3-3. Continuous
3-4. Discrete
3-5. Discrete
3-6. Continuous
3-7. Discrete
3-8. Continuous
3-9. Continuous
Section 3-3
Section 3-4
4 4
2 3 64
3-19. a) ∫ kx dx = k x3 =k . Therefore, k = 3/64.
0
0 3
4 4
3 3 3 x4
E ( X) = ∫ x dx = =3
0
64 64 4
0
4 4
3 2 3
V( X ) = ∫ x ( x − 3) 2 dx = 4 3 2
∫ ( x − 6x + 9 x )dx
0
64 64 0
( )
4
3 x5 4 3
= 5
− 64x + 93x = 0.6
64 0
2 2
2
b) ∫ k (1 + 2 x )dx = k ( x + x ) = k 6 . Therefore, k = 1/6.
0
0
2 2 2
1 1 1 x2
2 2x 3
E ( X) = ∫ x(1 + 2 x) dx = ∫ ( x +2 x )dx = 6 ( 2 + 3 ) =11 / 9
0
6 6 0 0
2
V (X ) = ò (1 + 2 x)( x -
0
1
6
11 2
9
) dx
ò( x
2
= 1
6
- 22
9
x + 121
81
+ 2 x3 - 44
9
x2 + 242
81
x)dx
0
= 1
6
( x3
3
- 22 x 2
9 2
+ 121
81
x + 2 x4 -
4
44 x 3
9 3
+ 242 x 2
81 2
)
2
0
=
1.704
6
= 0.284
∞ ∞
−x
c) ∫ ke dx = k ( −e −x ) = k . Therefore, k = 1.
0
0
∞ ∞ ∞ ∞
E ( X) = ∫ xe −x dx , using integration by parts E ( X) = −xe −x + ∫ e −x dx = −e −x =1
0 0
0 0
∞ ∞
V( X) = ∫ ( x − 1) 2 e −x dx = ∫ ( x 2 e −x − 2 xe −x + e −x ) dx . Now, using integration by parts
0 0
∞ ∞ ∞
2 −x
∫x e dx = 2 ∫ xe −x . Therefore, V( X) = ∫ e −x dx =1 , because e −x is a probability density
0 0 0
function.
100 + k 100 + k
d) ∫ kdx = kx 100 = k 2 , k2 = 1, so k =1 (where k > 0)
100
101
E(X) = ∫ 1ξδξ = 100 .5
100
101
2
V(X) = ∫ ( ξ − 100 .5) 1δξ = 0.08333
100
0.8
0.7
0.6
mean
0.5
)
x
f(
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0 1 2 3 4
x
x x 3t 2 x3
b) F(X) = ∫ f (t )dt = ∫ dt = ,0<x<4
0 0 64 64
c)
1.0
)
X
(
F
0.5
0.0
0 1 2 3 4 x
x
3-19b:
(1 + 2 x)
a) f ( x ) = , 0 < x <2
6
0.85
0.75
0.65
)x
(f0.55
0.45
0.35
0.25
0.15
0 1 2
x
b) F(X) =
x (1 + 2t )
ò
6
dt =
1
6
(x + x2 , ) 0<x<2
0
c)
1.0
)x
(
F
0.5
0.0
0 1 2 3 4
x
3-19c: f ( x ) = e − x , x >0
a)
1.0
)x
(f
0.5
0.0
0
x
c)
1.0
)x
(
F
0.5
0.0
0
x
)x
(f
1.00
0.95
c)
1.0
)x
(
F
0.5
0.0
1 1
2
b) P (0.5 < X ) = ∫ 1 .5 x dx = 0.5 x 3 = 0.5 − 0.0625 = 0.4375
0 .5
0.5
0.5 0.5
2
c) P ( −0.5 ≤ X ≤ 0.5) = ∫ 1.5x dx = 0.5 x 3 = 0.125
− 0.5
− 0.5
d) P(X < −2) = 0
1 1
2 3
f) P ( x < X ) = ∫ 1.5x dx = 0.5x = 0.5 − 0.5x 3 = 0.05
x
x
Then, x = 0.9655
x
−
∞ 3000
3-23. a) P(X > 1000) = e
∫ 3000
dx = 0.7165
1000
x
−
2000 3000
b) P(1000 < X < 2000) = e
∫ 3000
dx = 0.2031
1000
x
−
3000
c) P(X < 3000) = e 3000
∫ 3000
dx = 0.6321
0
x
−
x3000
d) P(X < x) = e
∫ 3000 dx = 0.10
0
x x
− x x
x 3000 − −
e
∫ 3000 dx = − e 3000 = 1− e 3000 = 0.1
0
0
x
−
e 3000 = 0.9
x = 316 .2
x
−
∞ 3000
e) E(X) = e
∫x dx = 3000
0
3000
V(X) = (3000)2 = 9,000,000
20
3-24. a) P(19.75 < X < 20) = ∫ 2.0δξ = 0.5
19 .75
20 .1
b) P(19.9 < X < 20.1) = ∫ 2.0δξ = 0.4
19 .9
20 .25
c) E(X) = ∫ 2.0 xdx = 20
19 .75
20 .25
x
d) F(x) = ∫ 2.0dx = 2 x −39 .5 , 19.75 < x < 20.25
19 .75
1.0
F(x)
0.5
0.0
∞
−3
3-27. a) Show that ∫ 2 ξ δξ = 1 :
1
∞ ∞
−3
∫ 2x dx = − x − 2 = 0 − ( −1− 2 ) = 1
1
1
ξ
ξ
∫ 2ξ
−3
b) F(X) = δξ = − ξ−2 = 1 − ξ−2
1
1
∞
−2
c) E(X) = ∫ 2x dx = 2.0
1
5
−3
d) P(X < 5) = ∫ 2x dx = 0.96
1
∞
−3
e) P(X > 7) = ∫ 2x dx = 0.0204
7
∞
−10 ( x −5)
3-28. a) E ( X) = ∫ x10 e dx .
5
Using integration by parts with u = x and dv = 10 e −10 ( x −5) dx , we obtain
∞
∞
∞ e −10 ( x −5)
E ( X ) = −xe −10 ( x −5) + ∫e −10 ( x −5) dx = 5 − = 5 .1
5
5
10
5
∞
Now, V ( X ) = ∫( x − 5.1)
2
10 e −10 ( x −5)dx . Using the integration by parts with u =( x −51
. ) 2 and
5
∞ ∞
dv = 10 e −10 ( x −5) , we obtain . ) 2 e −10 ( x −5)
V( X) = −( x −51 . ) e −10 ( x −5) dx .
+ 2 ∫ ( x − 51
5
5
From the definition of E(X), the integral above is recognized to equal 0. Therefore,
V( X) =(5 −5.1) 2 =0.01 .
∞ ∞
−10 ( x −5)
b) P( X > 5.1) = ∫10 e dx = − e −10 ( x −5) = e −10 (5.1−5) = 0.3679
5 .1
5 .1
120
600
3-30. a) E(X) = ∫x x 2
dx = 600 ln x |120
100 = 600 (ln 120 − ln 100 ) = 109 .39 µm
100
120
600
∫x
2
V(X) = 2
dx − E( x) 2 = 600 x |120 2
100 −109 .39 = 33 .19 µm
2
100
x
b) Average Cost = Coating Cost × Mean of the Coating Thickness
= 0.50 × 109.39 = $54.70
0.105
f(x)
0.100
0.095
1.0
F(x)
0.5
0.0
e −x / 10
3-32. Now, f ( x ) = for 0 < x and
10
x
1
∫e
x
Fx ( x) = −u / 10
du = −e −u / 10 = 1 − e −x / 10 for 0 < x.
10 0
0
0, x ≤ 0
Then, F ( x) =
x − x /1 0
1− e ,x > 0
a) P(X<60) = F(60) =1 - e-6 = 1 - 0.002479 = 0.9975
30
∫e dx =e −1.5 − e −3 =0.173343
1 −x / 10
b) 10
15
x
1
∫e du = 0.5 → x ≈ 6.93147
−u / 10
c)
10 0
∞
1 ∞ 2 − x / 10
σ 2 = V ( X ) = ∫ x 2 f ( x)dx − µ 2 =
10 ∫0
x e dx = e − x / 10 (( − x − 20) x − 200 ) | ∞0 −(10) 2
0
= 0 + 200 −100 = 100
σ= σ 2
= 100 = 10
10 70 10
3-33. a) P (1 < X < 10 ) = ∫1 f ( x ) dx = − |1 = 0.913
69 x
70 70 70
70
b) E ( X ) = ∫1 xf ( x ) dx = ∫1 dx = ln x |170 = 4.3101
69 x 69
70 70 70
Ε ( Ξ ) = ∫1 ξ φ( ξ) δξ = ∫1
2 2
δξ = 70
69
Var(X) = Ε ( Ξ 2 ) − [ Ε ( Ξ )] 2 = 70 − 18.5770 = 51.4230
c) 3*4.3101 = 12.93
Section 3-5
3-34. a) P(-1 < Z < 1) = P(Z < 1) – P(Z < -1) = 0.841345 – 0.158655 = 0.68269
b) P(-2 < Z < 2) = P(Z < 2) – P(Z < -2) = 0.97725 – 0.02275 = 0.9545
c) P(-3 < Z < 3) = P(Z < 3) – P(Z < -3) = 0.998650 – 0.00135 = 0.997300
d) P(Z < -3) = 0.00135
e) P(0 < Z ≤ 3) = P(Z < 3) – P(Z < 0) = 0.998650 – 0. 5 = 0.498650
3-36. a) P(-z < Z < z) = P(Z < z) – P(Z < -z) = 1 – 2P(Z<-z) = 0.95
So P(Z<-z) = 0.5(1 – 0.95) = 0.025
z = 1.96
b) P(-z < Z < z) = P(Z < z) – P(Z < -z) = 1 – 2P(Z<-z) = 0.99
So P(Z<-z) = 0.5(1 – 0.99) = 0.005
z = 2.58
c) P(-z < Z < z) = P(Z < z) – P(Z < -z) = 1 – 2P(Z<-z) = 0.68
So P(Z<-z) = 0.5(1 – 0.68) = 0.16
z=1
d) P(-z < Z < z) = P(Z < z) – P(Z < -z) = 1 – 2P(Z<-z) = 0.9973
So P(Z<-z) = 0.5(1 – 0.9973) = 0.00135
z=3
ξ − 20
3-38. a) P(X > x) = P(Z > z) = 0.5 where z = = 0. Thus x =20
2
ξ − 20
b) P(X > x) = P(Z > z) = 0.95 where z = = -1.645. Thus x =16.71
2
c) P(x < X < 20) = P(Z < 0) – P(Z < z)= 0.5 – P(Z < z) = 0.2
ξ − 20
So P(Z < z) = 0.3 where z = = -0.53. Thus x =18.94
2
3-39. a) P(X < 31) = P(Z < -3) = 0.001350
b) P(X > 30) = P(Z > -3.5) = 0.999767
c) P(33 < X < 37) = P(-2 < Z < 0) = P(Z < 0) – P(Z < -2) = 0.5 – 0.02275 = 0.47725
d) P(32 < X < 39) = P(-2.5 < Z < 1) = 0.841345 – 0.00621 = 0.835135
e) P(30 < X < 38) = P(-3.5 < Z < 0.5) = 0.691462 – 0.000233 = 0.691229
6250 − 6000
3-41. a) P(X < 6250) = P Z <
100
= P(Z < 2.5)
= 0.9938
0.62 − 0.5
3-43. a) P(X > 0.62) = P Z >
0.05
= P(Z > 2.4)
= 1 − P(Z < 2.4)
= 0.0082
b) P(0.47 < X < 0.63) = P(−0.6 < Z < 2.6)
= P(Z < 2.6) − P(Z < −0.6)
= 0.99534 −0.27425
= 0.7211
x − 0.5
c) P(X < x) = P Z < = 0.90.
0.05
Therefore,
x− 0.5 = 1.28 and x = 0.5641.
0.05
12 .1 −12 .4
b) P(X < 12.1) = PZ <
0.1
= P(Z < −3)
= 0.00135
and
12 .6 −12 .4
P(X > 12.6) = P Z >
0.1
= P(Z > 2)
= 0.02275
12 − µ
3-45. d) If P(X > 12) = 0.999, then P Z > = 0.999.
0.1
12−µ
Therefore, = −3.09 and µ = 12.309.
0.1
12 − µ
e) If P(X > 12) = 0.999, then P Z > = 0.999.
0.05
12 − µ µ = 12.155.
Therefore, = -3.09 and
0 . 05
0.5 − 0.4
3-46. a) P(X > 0.5) = P Z >
0.05
= P(Z > 2)
= 1 − 0.97725
= 0.02275
b) P(0.4 < X < 0.5) = P(0 < Z < 2)
= P(Z < 2) −P(Z < 0)
= 0.47725
x − 0.4
c) P(X > x) = 0.90, then P Z > = 0.90.
0.05
Therefore, x − 0 . 4 = −1.28 and x = 0.336.
0 . 05
90 .3 − 90 .2
3-47. a) P(90.3 < X) = P < Z
0 .1
= P(1 < Z)
= P(Z > 1)
= 1 − P(Z < 1)
=1 −0.841345
= 0.158655
89 .7 − 90 .2
P(X < 89.7) = P Z <
0.1
= P(Z < −5)
≅0 .
Therefore, the answer is 0.1587.
b) The process mean should be set at the center of the specifications; that is, at µ = 90.0.
89 .7 − 90 90 .3 − 90
c) P(89.7 < X < 90.3) = P <Z <
0.1 0.1
= P(−3 < Z < 3) = 0.9973.
1140 −1000
3-48. a) P(X > 1140) = P(Z > ) = P(Z > 2.33) = P(Z < -2.33) = 0.009903
60
900 −1000
b) P(X < 900) = P(Z > ) = P(Z > -0.17) = 0.432505
60
3-49. a) P(X > 9) = P(Z > 1.34) = 0.09012
b) P(5.5 < X < 8.5) = P(-0.35 < Z < 1.10) = 0.864334 - 0.363169 = 0.501165
c) Threshold = µ + 3.75σ = 6.23 + 3.75(2.064) = 13.97
5000 − 7000
3-50. a) P(X < 5000) = P Z <
600
= P(Z < −3.33)
= 0.0004.
x − 7000 x − 7000
b) P(X > x) = 0.95. Therefore, P Z > = 0.95 and 600 = −1.64. Consequently, x = 6016.
600
0.0026 − 0.002
3-51. a) P(X > 0.0026) = P Z >
0.0004
= P(Z > 1.5)
= 0.0668.
2.10 − µ
ˆ
c) P(X < 2.10) = P(Z < z) = 0.999 where z = = 3.09. Thus µ̂= 1.9455
0.05
ln( x) − 5
P( X ≤ x) = P (e W ≤ x) = P (W < ln( x)) = Φ = 0.95
3
ln( x ) − 5
= 1.65 x = e 1.65 ( 3) +5 = 20952 .2
3
2
c) μ = E ( X ) = eθ +ω /2
= e5 +9 / 2 = e9.5 =13359.7
2θ +ω 2 2
V (X ) = e (e ω −1) = e 10 +9 (e 9 −1) = e 19 (e 9 −1) = 1.45 x10 12
3-56. a) Find the values of θ and ω 2 given that E(X) = 10000 and σ = 20,000
2 2 2
10000 = eθ +ω /2
200002 = e 2θ +ω (eω − 1)
x = e θ and y = e ω
2
Let then (1) 10000 =x y and (2) 200002 = x 2y y( − 1) =x 2y 2 2
x− y
Square (1): 10000 = x 2 y and substitute into (2)
2
20000 2
=10000 ( y −1) 2
y =5
10000
Substitute y into (1) and solve for x: x= =4472.1360
5
θ = ln( 4472 .1360 ) = 8.4056 and ω 2 = ln( 5) =1.6094
ln( 10000 ) − 8.4056
b) P ( X > 10000 ) = P (e > 10000 ) = P (W > ln( 10000 )) = 1 − Φ
W
1.2686
=1 −Φ(0.63 ) =1 −0.7357 = 0.2643
W ln( x ) − 8.4056
c) P ( X > x ) = P (e > x) = P (W > ln( x )) = Φ = 0.1
1.2686
ln( x ) − 8.4056 −1.280(1.2686)
+ 8.4056
= −1.28 x =e = 881.65 hours
1.2686
3-57. β = 0.2 and δ = 100 hours
1
E ( X ) = 100Γ(1 + ) = 100 × 5! = 12, 000
0.2
2 2 2 1 2 10
V ( X ) = 100 Γ (1 + ) − 100 [Γ (1 + )] = 3.61 × 10
0.2 0.2
0.2
3-58. a) P ( X < 10000) = FX (10000) = 1 − e −100 = 1 − e −2.512 = 0.9189
0.2
b) P ( X > 5000) = 1 − FX (5000) = e −50 = 0.1123
1
3-61. E ( X ) = δ Γ1 + = 2.5
2
2 .5 5
δ = =
So 1 π
Γ1 +
2
25
Var ( X ) = δ 2Γ( 2) − ( E ( X )) 2 = − 2.52 = 1.7077
π
Stdev(X)= 1.3068
∞
3-62. Γ( r ) = ∫ x r −1e − x dx . Use integration by parts with u = x r −1 and dv =e-x. Then,
0
∞ ∞
Γ( r ) = − x r −1e − x + ( r − 1) ∫ x r − 2e − x dx = ( r − 1)Γ ( r − 1) .
0 0
9
c) Γ 2 ( ) =7 Γ 7
2 ( 2) =7 5 31
2 2 2 2 ( 1Γ)2 105 1/ 2
=π
16
=
11.6317
Section 3-6
3-69.
Normal Probability Plot
.999
.99
.95
Probability
.80
.50
.20
.05
.01
.001
Because the points in normal probability plot pass the fat pencil test, we conclude that the normal distribution is an
appropriate model.
3-70.
Normal Probability Plot Normal Probability Plot
.999 .999
.99 .99
.95 .95
Probability
Probability
.80 .80
.50 .50
.20 .20
.05 .05
.01 .01
.001 .001
The dimension from both machine one and two seem to have a normal distribution with approximately the same mean.
Dimension from machine two tends to have higher variability than those from machine one, note the difference in the
horizontal scale.
3-71.
Normal Probability Plot
.999
.99
.95
Probability
.80
.50
.20
.05
.01
.001
The normal distribution is a reasonable model for the data. It also appears that the variance has been reduced.
3-72.
Normal Probability Plot
.999
.99
.95
Probability
.80
.50
.20
.05
.01
.001
3-73.
Normal Probability Plot for Flatness Lognormal base e Probability Plot for Flatness
ML Estimates - 95% CI ML Estimates - 95% CI
99 99 ML Estimates
ML Estimates
Mean 3.18533 Location 1.00490
95 95
StDev 1.78176 Scale 0.558967
90 90
Goodness of Fit 80
Goodness of Fit
80
AD* 1.478 70 AD* 0.743
70
Percent
Percent
60 60
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
5 5
1 1
0 4 8 1 10
Data Data
Weibull Probability Plot for Flatness
ML Estimates - 95% CI
99 ML Estimates
95
90 Shape 1.92093
80 Scale 3.61414
70
60
50 Goodness of Fit
40 AD* 0.983
30
Percent
20
10
3
2
Based on three probability plots, the log normal (base e) appears to be the most appropriate choice as a model for the
flatness data.
3-74.
Normal Probability Plot for Time Lognormal base e Probability Plot for Time
ML Estimates - 95% CI ML Estimates - 95% CI
99 ML Estimates 99 ML Estimates
Mean 5.3036 Location 1.21821
95 95
StDev 4.22784 Scale 1.12824
90 90
80
Goodness of Fit Goodness of Fit
80
70 AD* 1.052 AD* 1.12
70
Percent
Percent
60 60
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
5 5
1 1
99 ML Estimates
95
90 Shape 1.18814
80 Scale 5.60911
70
60
50 Goodness of Fit
40 AD* 0.68
30
Percent
20
10
5
3
2
Weibull probability density model appears to provide the most suitable fit to the data.
3-75.
Normal Probability Plot for Duration Lognormal base e Probability Plot for Duration
ML Estimates - 95% CI ML Estimates - 95% CI
99 ML Estimates 99 ML Estimates
Mean 4.43 Location 1.21103
95 95
StDev 2.45595 Scale 0.908494
90 90
80
Goodness of Fit 80
Goodness of Fit
70 AD* 1.011 70 AD* 2.205
Percent
Percent
60 60
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
5 5
1 1
99 ML Estimates
95
90 Shape 1.72033
80 Scale 4.91235
70
60
50 Goodness of Fit
40 AD* 1.437
30
Percent
20
10
5
3
2
The normal distribution appears to be the most appropriate choice as a model for the data.
3-76.
Normal Probability Plot for TimetoFailur Lognormal base e Probability Plot for TimetoFailur
ML Estimates - 95% CI ML Estimates - 95% CI
99 ML Estimates 99 ML Estimates
Mean 4.38 Location 1.07042
95 95
StDev 4.24880 Scale 0.930132
90 90
80
Goodness of Fit Goodness of Fit
80
70 AD* 2.192 AD* 0.461
70
Percent
Percent
60 60
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
5 5
1 1
99 ML Estimates
95
90 Shape 1.14500
80 Scale 4.61938
70
60
50 Goodness of Fit
40 AD* 0.643
30
Percent
20
10
3
2
Based on three probability plots, the log normal (base e) appears to be the most appropriate choice as a model for the time-
to-failure data.
3-77. The normal distribution does not provide a reasonable model based on the normal probability plot. The data did not lie
along the line and did not pass the fat pencil test.
Probability Plot of slor intensity
Normal - 95% CI
99
Mean 810.5
StDev 128.3
95 N 35
AD 0.888
90
P-Value 0.021
80
70
Percent
60
50
40
30
20
10
1
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200
C1
3-78. Based on three probability plots, the normal appears to be the most appropriate choice as a model for the temperatures of
effluent from a sewage treatment facility.
60
50
40
30
20
10
1
40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58
Temp
Probability Plot of Temp
Lognormal - 95% CI
99
Loc 3.872
Scale 0.05658
95 N 24
AD 0.595
90
P-Value 0.109
80
70
Percent
60
50
40
30
20
10
1
40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58
Temp
20
10
3
2
1
35 40 45 50 55
Temp
Section 3-7
3-79. The function is a probability mass function. All probabilities are nonnegative and sum to 1.
c) P(X > 4.5) = P(X = 5) + P(X = 6) + P(X = 7) = 0.158 + 0.140 + 0.018 = 0.316
1.0
0.9
0.8
)
x
(0.7
F
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
3-80. The function is a probability mass function. All probabilities are nonnegative and sum to 1.
e) Graph of F(x)
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
)x0.6
(
F
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
3-81. The function is a probability mass function. All probabilities are nonnegative and sum to 1.
1.0
0.9
)x
(
F
0.8
0.7
0.6
1 2 3
3-82. The function is a probability mass function. All probabilities are nonnegative and sum to 1.
d) P(X ≥ 1) = 1
1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 30
e) E(X) = 1 × + 2 × + 3 × + 4 × = =3
2 5 2 5 2 5 2 5 10
1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4
V(X) = 1
2
× + 22 × + 32 × + 42 × − (3) 2 = 1
2 5 2 5 2 5 2 5
f) Graph of F(x)
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
F(x)
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
1 2 3 4
3-83. The function is a probability mass function. All probabilities are nonnegative and sum to 1.
b) P(X > 11) = P(X = 12) + P(X = 13) = 0.05 + 0.05 = 0.10
c) P(8 ≤ X ≤ 12) = P(X = 8) + P( X = 9) + P(X = 10) + P(X = 11) + P(X = 12) = 0.91
3-84. a) P(X = 10 million) = 0.4, P(X = 5 million) = 0.5, P(X = 1 million) = 0.1
c)
0.5
0.4
)x
(
p
0.3
0.2
0.1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
x
E(X) = 6.6
d)
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
)x
(0.6
F
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
x
3-85. a) F(x)
x 0 1 2 3 4 5
F(x) 0.1 0.25 0.50 0.75 0.90 1.00
b) Mean:
5
E ( x ) = ∑ xf ( x)
x =0
= 0(0.1) + 1(0.15) + 2(0.25) + 3(0.25) + 4(0.15) + 5(0.1) = 2.5
Variance:
5
V ( x) = ∑ x 2 f ( x ) − µ 2
x =0
3-86. a) F(x)
x 0 1 2 3
F(x) 0.7 0.85 0.95 1.00
b) Mean:
3
E ( x ) = ∑ xf ( x)
x =0
= 0(0.7) + 1(0.15) + 2(0.1) + 3(0.05) = 0.5
Variance:
5
V ( x) = ∑ x 2 f ( x ) − µ 2
x =0
= 02 (0.7) = 12 (0.15) + 22 (0.1) + 32 (0.05) − 0.52 = 0.75
c) P ( x > 1.5) = P( x = 2) + P ( x = 3) = 0.1 + 0.05 = 0.15
d) P ( x ≤ 2) = P( x = 0) + P ( x = 1) + P ( x = 2) = 0.7 + 0.15 + 0.1 = 0.95
Section 3-8
3-87. A binomial distribution is based on a fixed number of independent trials with two outcomes and a constant probability
of success on each trial.
a) reasonable.
b) independence assumption not reasonable.
c) The probability that the second component fails depends on the failure time of the first
component. The binomial distribution is not reasonable.
d) not independent trials with constant probability.
e) probability of a correct answer not constant.
f) reasonable.
g) probability of finding a hole on the chip is not constant.
h) If the fills are independent with a constant probability of an underfill, then the binomial distribution for the number
packages underfilled is reasonable.
i) Because of the bursts, each trial (that consists of sending a bit) is not independent.
j) not independent trials with constant probability
3-88. a)
0.25
0.20
0.15
f(x)
0.10
0.05
0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
x
b)
1.0
0.8
0.6
F(x)
0.4
0.2
0.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
x
20 15 5
3-89. a) P ( X = 15 ) =
15 0.5 (0.5) = 0.0148
20 0 20 + 20 1 19 20 12 8
b) P ( X ≤ 12 ) =
0 0.5 0.5
1 0.5 0.5 +... +
12 0.5 0.5 = 0.8684
20 19 1 20 20 0
c) P ( X ≥ 19 ) =
0.5 (0.5) +
20
0.5 (0.5) = 0
19
20 13 7 20 14 6
d) P (13 ≤ X < 15 ) =
13 0.5 0.5 +
14
0.5 0.5 = 0.1109
e)
1.0
F(x)
0.5
0.0
0 10 20
x
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
f(x)
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0 5 10
x
b) The cumulative distribution function is
d) The value of X that appears to be least likely is 10, although the probabilities for values of x greater than
1 are very small.
10 5 5
3-91. a) P ( X = 5) =
5 0.1 (0.90 ) = 0.0015
10 0 10 10
1 9 2 8 10
b) P ( X ≤ 2) = 0 0.10 0.90 + 1 0.10 0.90 + 2 0.10 0.90
=0.9298
10 9 1 10
10 0
c) P ( X ≥ 9) =
9 0.10 (0.90 ) + 10 0.10 (0.90 ) = 0
10
3 7 4 10
6
d) P (3 ≤ X < 5) =
3 0.10 0.90 + 4 0.10 0.90 = 0.0686
3-92. Let X denote the number of defective circuits. Then, X has a binomial distribution with
40 0 40
n = 40 and p = 0.01. Then, P(X = 0) = 0.01 0.99 = 0.6690 .
0
3-93. Let X denote the number of parts that will successfully pass the test. Then X has a
72 5
binomial distribution with n = 7 and p = 0.80. P(X=2) = 0.8 0.2 = 0.0043
2
3-94. Let X denote the number of times the line is occupied. Then, X has a binomial
distribution with n = 8 and p = 0.45
8 2 6
a) P ( X = 2) =
2 0.45 (0.55 ) = 0.1569
8
0.45 (0.55 ) = 0.9916
0 8
b) P ( X ≥ 1) = 1 − P ( X = 0) = 1 −
0
c) E(X) = 8(0.45) = 3.6
æ50 ö æ50 ö
÷0.1 (0.9 ) + ç ÷0.1 (0.9 ) = 0
49 1 50 0
c) P ( X ³ 49 ) = ç
ç 49 ÷ ç 50 ÷
è ø è ø
a) P ( X > 153
. ) = P ( X ≥ 2) = 1 − P ( X ≤ 1)
=1 − [( ) 0.01
20
0
0
0.99 20
+ ( ) 0.01
20
1
1
0.99 19 ]
=0.0169
c) Let Y denote the number of times X exceeds 1 in the next five samples. Then, Y is
binomial with n = 5 and p = 0.1897 from part b.
éæ5 ö ù
P( Y ³ 1) = 1 - P( Y = 0) = 1 - êç
ç ÷ ÷0.1897
0
(0.8103 )5 ú = 0.6507
ëè 0 ø
ê ú
û
The probability is 0.6507 that at least one sample from the next five will contain more
than one defective.
3-97. Let X denote the passengers with tickets that do not show up for the flight. Then, X is
Binomial with n = 125 and p = 0.1.
a)P( X ³ 5) = 1 - P( X £ 4)
éæ1 2ö 5 0 1 2 5 æ1 2ö 5 1 1 2 4 æ1 2ö 5 2 1 2ù3
êçç ÷÷0.1 (0.9) + çç ÷÷0.1 (0.9) + çç ÷÷0.1 (0.9) ú
êè 0 ø è1ø è2ø ú
=1- ê ú
1 2 5 1 2 5
ê+ æç ö÷0.13 (0.9)1 2 +2 æç ö÷0.14 (0.9)1 2 1 ú
êë çè 3 ÷ø ç4÷
è ø úû
= 0.9 9 6 1
b)P( X ³ 6) = 1 - P( X £ 5) = 0.9 8 9
c) E(X) = np = 125(0.9) = 112.5
σ X = np(1 − p) = 125( 0.9 )( 0.1) = 3.354
3-98. Let X denote the number of defective components among those stocked.
100
0.02 ( 0.98 )
0 100
a ) P ( X = 0) = = 0.133
0
102 0 102 102 1 101 102 2 100
b) P( X ≤ 2) = 0.02 0.98 + 0.02 0.98 + 0.02 0.98 = 0.666
0 1 2
c) P( X ≤ 5) = 0.981
3-99. Let X denote the number of students who successfully land the plane.
9 0
(0.80 ) (0.20 ) = 0.13422
9
a) P ( X = 9) =
9
9 9
0 (0.80 ) (0.20 ) = 0.000001
0
b) P ( X = 0) =
9 1
(0.80 ) (0.20 ) = 0.301990
8
c) P ( X = 8) =
8
σ2 = V(X)=np(1-p) = 4.748
σ= V ( X ) =2.179
3-102. n=20,p=0.13
2 3 1 0 7
(a) P(X=3) =
p (1−p)
=0.235
3
(b) P(X≥3) = 1-P(X<3)=0.492
(c) µ = E(X) = np = 20*0.13 = 2.6
σ= V ( X ) = 1.504
Section 3-9.1
ε −5 5 0
3-104. a) Π( Ξ = 0) = = ε − 5 = 0.00674
0!
b) P ( X ≤ 3) = P ( X = 0) + P ( X = 1) + P( X = 2) + P( X = 3)
−5e −5 51 e −5 52 e −5 53
=e + + +
1! 2! 3!
= 0.2650
e −5 56
c) P( X = 6) = = 0.146
6!
e −5 59
d) P( X = 9) = = 0.0363
9!
3-107. a) Let X denote the number of calls in one hour. Then, X is a Poisson random variable with
e −20 20 18
λ = 20. P( X = 18 ) = = 0.0844 .
18!
e −10 101 e −10 10 2 e −10 10 3
b) λ = 10 for a thirty minute period. P(X ≤ 3) = e − 20 + + + = 0.0103
1! 2! 3!
c) Let Y denote the number of calls in two hours. Then, Y is a Poisson random variable
e −40 40 30
with λ = 40. P( Y = 30 ) = = 0.0185
30!
d) Let W denote the number of calls in 30 minutes. Then W is a Poisson random variable
e −10 10 10
with λ = 10. P ( W = 10 ) = = 0.1251
10!
3-108. a) Let X denote the number of tremors in a 12 month period. Then, X is a Poisson random
e −6 610
variable with λ = 6. P (W = 10 ) = = 0.0413
10!
b) λ =2(6) = 12 for a two year period. Let Y denote the number of tremors in a two year
e −12 12 18
period. P (Y = 18 ) = = 0.0255
18!
c) λ = (1/12)6 = 0.5 for a one month period. Let W denote the number of tremors in a
e − 0 . 5 0 .5 0
one-month period. P (W = 0) = = 0.6065
0!
d) λ = (1/2)6 = 3 for a six month period. Let V denote the number of tremors in a six-
month period.
Π(ς > 5) = 1 − Π(ς ≤ 5)
ε −3 3 0 ε −3 31 ε −3 3 2 ε −3 3 3 ε −3 3 4 ε −3 3 5
= 1− + + + + +
0! 1! 2! 3! 4! 5!
= 1 − 0.9161
= 0.0839
3-109. a) Let X denote the number of cracks in 5 miles of highway. Then, X is a Poisson random
variable with λ = 10. P ( X = 0) = e −10 =4.54 ×10 −5
b) Let Y denote the number of cracks in a half mile of highway. Then, Y is a Poisson
random variable with λ = 1. P ( Y ≥ 1) = 1 − P ( Y = 0) = 1 − e −1 = 0.6321 .
c) The assumptions of a Poisson process require that the probability of a count is constant for all intervals. If the
probability of a count depends on traffic load and the load varies, then the assumptions of a Poisson process are not
valid. Separate Poisson random variables might be appropriate for the heavy and light load sections of the highway.
3-110. a) Let X denote the number of flaws in 10 square feet of plastic panel. Then, X is a Poisson random variable
with λ x = 0.05/ft2. Let Y be a Poisson random variable with λ y =0.5/10ft2. Then, the probability there are no
surface flaws in the auto’s interior is P( Y = 0 ) = e −0 .5 = 0.6065 .
[ ]
10
b) Let Y denote the number of cars with no flaws, P( Y = 0 ) = e- 0.5 = e- 5 = 0.00674
c) Let W denote the number of cars with surface flaws. Because the number of flaws has a Poisson distribution, the
occurrences of surface flaws in cars are independent events with constant probability. From part a), the probability a
car contains surface flaws is 1−0.6065 = 0.3935. Consequently, W is binomial with n = 10 and p = 0.3935.
P(W ≤ 1) = P(W = 0) + P( W = 1)
10 10
= 0.3935 0 (0.6065 )10 + 0.3935 1 (0.6065 ) 9
0 1
= 0.0504
3-111. a) Let X denote the failures in 8 hours. Then, X has a Poisson distribution with λ = 0.32.
P ( X = 0) = e −0.32 = 0.7261
b) Let Y denote the number of failure in 24 hours. Then, Y has a Poisson distribution
with λ = 0.96.
ε −0.96 (0.96 )1 ε −0.96 (0.96 ) 2
Π(Ψ ≥ 3) = 1 − Π(Ψ ≤ 2) = 1 − ε − 0.96 + + = 1 − 0.9269 = 0.0731
1! 2!
3-113. Let X denote number of calls exceeding the maximum design constraint. X follows a Poisson
distribution with λ = 9. P( X > 10 ) = 1 − P( X ≤ 10 ) = 1 − 0.706 = 0.2941 .
3-114. a) Let X denote the number of flaws in 25 square yards. Then, X is a Poisson random
variable with λ = 25(0.01) = 0.25. P(X = 0) = e-0.25 = 0.7788.
b) Let Y denote the number of flaws in one square yard, then P(Y = 0) = e-0.01 = 0.99
c) P(Y = 0) = 0.99. Let V denote the number of square yards out of 10 that contain no
flaws. Then, V is a binomial random variable with n = 10 and p = 0.99.
Section 3-9.2
3-118. a) P( X ≤ 0) = 0
∞ ∞
b) P( X ≥ 3) = ∫ 3e −3xdx = −e −3x = e −9 = 0.0001234
3 3
2 2
c) P( X ≤ 2) = ∫ 3e −3xdx = −e −3x = 1 − e −6 = 0.99752
0 0
3 3
d) P(2 < X < 3) = ∫ 3e −3x dx = −e −3x = e −6 − e −9 = 0.002355
2 2
x x
e) P( X ≤ x) = ∫ 3e −3t dt = −e −3t = 1 − e −3x = 0.05 and x = 0.0171
0 0
3-119. If E(X) = 5, then λ =0.20
∞ ∞
−0.2 x
a) P ( X > 5) = ∫ 0.2e dx = −e −0.2 x = e −1 = 0.3679
5 5
∞
−0.2 x
b) P(X > 15 ) = − e = e −3 = 0.0498
15
∞
−0.2 x
c) P( X > 20 ) = − e = e −4 = 0.0183
20
x x
−0.2 t
d) P ( X < x ) = ∫ 0.2e dt = − e −0.2 t = 1 − e −0.2 x = 0.95 and x = 14.9787.
0 0
3-120. Let X denote the time until the first count. Then, X is an exponential random variable with
λ = 3 counts per minute.
∞
∞
a) P ( X > 0.5) = ∫3e dx = − e −3 x = e −1.5 = 0.2231
−3 x
0.5
0.5
1/ 6
( ) = ∫3e
1/ 6
b) P X < dx = − e −3 x = 1 − e −1 / 2 = 0.3935
10 −3 x
60
0
0
2
c) P (1 < X < 2) = − e −3 x = e −3 − e −6 = 0.0473
1
x
−3t = 1 − e −3 x = 0.95 .
f) P(X < x) = 0.95 and P(X < x) = − e
0
Therefore, x = 0.9986 minutes.
3-121. Let X denote the time until the first call. Then, X is exponential and
λ= 1 = 1
E ( X ) 12 calls/minute.
∞ x x ∞
1 e −12 dx = − e −12
a) P ( X > 30 ) = ∫ 12 = e −2.5 = 0.0821
30 30
b) The probability of at least one call in a 10-minute interval equals one minus the
probability of zero calls in a 10-minute interval and that is P(X > 10).
−x ∞
P ( X >10 ) = −e 12 = e −5 / 6 = 0.4346 .
10
Therefore, the answer is 1− 0.4346 = 0.5654.
− x 10
c) P (5 < X < 10 ) = − e 12 = e −5 / 12 − e −10 / 12 = 0.2246
5
−t x
d) P(X < x) = 0.90 and P ( X < x ) = −e 12 =1 −e −x / 12 = 0.90 . Therefore, x = 27.63 minutes.
0
1 / 30
1 / 30
a) P ( X < 2) = ∫
0
50 e −50 x dx =− e −50 x
0
= 1 − e −50 / 30 = 0.8111
3 / 40
3 / 40
b) P ( 2.5 < X < 4.5) = ∫
1 / 24
50 e −50 x dx =− e −50 x
1 / 24
= e −25 / 12 − e −15 / 4 = 0.101
c) E(X) = λ = 50 in 1 hour
In a twenty-minute interval, E(X) = 50/3 = 16.667.
e −16 .667 16 .667 2
d) P(X=2) = =0
2!
3-123. Let X denote the distance between major cracks. Then, X is an exponential random
variable with λ = 1/E(X) = 0.2 cracks/mile.
∞ ∞
−0.2 x
a) P(X > 10) = ∫ 0.2e dx = − e −0.2 x = e −2 = 0.1353
10 10
b) Let Y denote the number of cracks in 10 miles of highway. Because the distance between cracks is exponential, Y is
a Poisson random variable with λ 10(0.2) = 2 cracks per 10 miles.
e −2 2 2
P(Y = 2) = = 0.2707
2!
c) σ X = 1/λ = 5 miles
15 15
−0.2 x
d) P (12 < X < 15 ) = ∫ 0.2e dx = −e −0.2 x = e −2.4 − e −3 = 0.0409
12 12
∞
−0.2 x
e) P(X > 5) = −e = e −1 = 0.3679 . By independence of the intervals in a Poisson process, the answer is
5
0.36792 = 0.1353. Alternatively, the answer can also be found as P(X > 10) = e-2 = 0.1353. The probability does
depend on whether or not the lengths of highway are consecutive.
f) By the memoryless property, the answer is P(X > 10) = 0.1353 from part b.
3-124. Let X denote the time until a failure occurs. Then, X is an exponential random variable
and λ = 1/4.
1 1
−x / 4
a) P(X < 1) = ∫ 14 e dx = 1− e − x / 4 = 0.2212
0 0
2 2
−x / 4
b) P(X < 2) = ∫ 14 e dx = 1− e − x / 4 = 0.3935
0 0
4 4
c) P(X < 4) = ∫ 1
4
e − x / 4dx = 1− e − x / 4 = 0.6321
0 0
d) P(X < b) = 0.03
b b
−x / 4
∫4e
1 dx = − e − x / 4 = 1 − e − b / 4 = 0.03
0 0
−b / 4
e = 0.97
b
− = ln( 0.97 )
4
b = 0.122
1 1
∫
1
λ
e − x / λ dx = − e − x / λ = 1 − e −1 / λ = 0.03
0 0
e −1 / λ = 0.97
1 .
− = ln( 0.97 )
λ
1
= 0.03
λ
λ = 33 .3
3-125. Let X denote the time until a message is received. Then, X is an exponential random
variable and λ =1/2.
∞ ∞
−x / 2
a) P(X > 2) = ∫ 21 e dx = −e −x / 2 = e −1 = 0.3679
2 2
b) The same as part a.
c) E(X) = 2 hours.
3-126. Let X denote the number of calls in 30 minutes. Because the time between calls is an exponential random variable, X is a
Poisson random variable with λ =1 / E ( X) = 0.1 calls per minute ⇒ 3 calls per 30 minutes.
a) P(X > 3) =
−3 0
[
−3 1 −3 2 −3 3
1 − P( X ≤ 3) = 1 − e 0!3 + e 1!3 + e 2 !3 + e 3!3 = 0.3528 ]
b) P(X = 0) = e−3 30 = 0.04979
0!
c) Let Y denote the time between calls in minutes. Then, P( Y ≥ x) = 0.01 and
∞ ∞
P( Y ≥ x) = ∫ 0.1e −0.1t dt = −e −0.1t = e −0.1x .
x x
Therefore, e −0.1x = 0.01 and x = 46.05 minutes.
∞
∞
Π(Ψ ≥ 120 ) = ∫ 0.1ε δτ = −ε − 0.1τ = ε −12 = 6.14 × 10 − 6
− 0.1τ
d)
120
120
e) The probability of no calls in one-half hour is (from part b) e-3 = 0.04979. Therefore, for four non-overlapping one-
half hour intervals, the probability of no calls is (e-3)4 = (0.04979)4 = 6.14 × 10-6.