Until now, our analysis of the impact of changes in prices and income on consumer
demand has been qualitative rather than quantitative; that is, we focused on the
“big picture” to identify only the directions of the changes and said little about their
magnitude.
THE ELASTICITY CONCEPT
THE ELASTICITY CONCEPT
Suppose some variable, such as the price of a product, increased by 10 percent. What
would happen to the quantity demanded of the good?
The primary tool used to determine the magnitude of such a change is elasticity
analysis. An elasticity measures the responsiveness of one variable to changes in
another variable. For example:
The sign of the elasticity determines the relationship between G and S. If the elasticity is
positive, an increase in S leads to an increase in G. If the elasticity is negative, an
increase in S leads to a decrease in G.
Whether the absolute value of the elasticity is greater or less than 1 determines how
responsive G is to changes in S. If the absolute value of elasticity is > 1, then the
relationship between G and S is elastic. If the absolute value of elasticity < 1, then the
relationship between G and S is inelastic.
THE ELASTICITY CONCEPT Using Calculus
An alternative way to measure the elasticity of a function G = f(S) is
This relationship among the changes in price, elasticity, and total revenue is called
the total revenue test.
Marginal Revenue and the Own Price Elasticity of Demand
Notice that when −∞ < E < −1, demand is
elastic, and the formula implies that MR is
positive.
Time
Demand tends to be more inelastic in the short term than in the long term.
Time allows consumers to seek out available substitutes.
Expenditure Share
Goods that comprise a small share of consumer’s budgets tend to be more inelastic
than goods for which consumers spend a large portion of their incomes.
CROSS-PRICE ELASTICITY
Cross-price elasticity of demand, which reveals the responsiveness of the demand
for a good to changes in the price of a related good.
where β0 = ln(c) and the βi’s are arbitrary real numbers. This relation is called a
log-linear demand function.
Elasticities for Nonlinear Demand Functions (2)
Source: Brooks, Chris. 2014. Introduction Econometrics for Finance 3rd edition.
New York: Cambridge Press.
REGRESSION ANALYSIS
REGRESSION ANALYSIS
Suppose a television manufacturer has data on the price and quantity of TVs sold
last month at 10 outlets in Central Java. Here we use price and quantity as our
independent and dependent variables, respectively.
REGRESSION ANALYSIS (2)
QdTV = f(PTV )
QdTV = ⍺0 + 𝛼1PTV+ ei
where,
⍺0 = constant (intercept)
⍺1 = coefficient (slope)
ei = error term
and
The t-statistic of a parameter estimate is the ratio of the value of the parameter
estimate to its standard error. The rule of thumb is that if the absolute value of a
t-statistic is greater than or equal to 2, the manager can be 95 percent confident
that the true value of the underlying parameter in the regression is not zero.
and
Problem with the R-square is that it cannot decrease when additional explanatory
variables are included in the regression. For this reason, many researchers use the
adjusted R-square as a measure of goodness of fit. The adjusted R-square
“penalizes” the researcher for performing a regression with only a few degrees of
freedom (that is, estimating numerous coefficients from relatively few observations).
Evaluating the Overall Fit of the Regression Line (2)
An alternative measure of goodness of fit, called the F-statistic. The F-statistic
provides a measure of the total variation explained by the regression relative to the
total unexplained variation.
The greater the F-statistic, the better the overall fit of the regression line through
the actual data.
As with P-values, the lower the significance value of the F-statistic, the more
confident you can be of the overall fit of the regression equation.
Regression for Nonlinear Functions
Sometimes, a plot of the data will reveal
nonlinearities in the data, as seen in Figure 3–5
“Log-Linear Regression Line”.
Since this is a log-linear equation, the coefficients are elasticities. In particular, the
coefficient of ln(ConsumerConfidence) (0.9) tells us the percentage change in
holiday sales (HS) resulting from each 1 percent change in consumer confidence.
Consequently, when consumer confidence decreases by 4 percent, this means
ln(HS) = 25.8 + 0.9(–4) = 25.8 –3.6 = 22.2.
In other words, the director should expect holiday sales to be 3.6 percent lower in
the city where consumer confidence has declined by 4 percent, and so should not
be particularly optimistic about holiday sales this year. The results indicate the
director could mitigate the sales decrease by lowering price.