i rr.T,opthP-rgp?fatlgn
,:rrf
:2ii; 5:
,1 tt-l:
'
l:
D
f | 0. 6-2 Graphic example of cones of caries (decay) in pit and fissure of tooth {A) and on facial
(B) and proximal (C) surfaceswhen caries has penetratedapproximately same depth into dentin.
Note differencesin loss of dnamel on external surfaces.D, Sectional view of initial stage of tooth
preparations for lesions in A and B showing cavosurfaceangle (cs/,'axialwall tal,.pul pal wall (p);
enamel wall (e/,'dentinalwall (d/,'margin (m); and der.rtinoenameljunction (,r/.Note in upper ex-
pfoded view that cavosurface angle /cs,fcan be visualized by imaginary projections (w,) of the
preparationwall and (us'/ of the unpreparedsurfacecontiguouswith margin.forming angle cs,.
Ang les (cs) and (cs') are equal because.oppositeangles formed at the intersection of two strailTht
fines are equal. Likewise,minimal restorative material angle (rm) is equal to angle (rrn,/,