Third generation (3G) wireless networks have been well studied and optimized with
traditional radio resource management techniques, but still there is room for improvement.
Cognitive radio (CR) technology can bring significant network improvements by providing
awareness to the surrounding radio environment, exploiting previous network knowledge
and optimizing the use of radio resources using machine learning and artificial intelligence
techniques. Cognitive radio can also co-exist with legacy equipment thus acting as a bridge
among heterogenous communication systems. In this paper, we present a hybrid cognitive
radio engine for 3G wireless networks. The engine is designed using case-based reasoning
(CBR) and decision tree (DT) searches, as the main blocks to the engine's reasoning,
learning and optimization functions. The engine model was implemented and tested via
simulation, it was applied to improve coverage in the network.
The field of Cognitive Radio has transitioned from theory into reality as evidenced by
applications
emerging from pure paper research. Dynamic Spectrum Access is now almost
commonplace [1] and
several cognitive engine architectures are under development [2-4]. Artificial Intelligence
algorithms
comprised of decision making, learning and optimization toolboxes comprise the primary
elements of
these architectures and are typically founded upon the simple yet elegant Observe, Orient,
Decide, Act
(OODA) Loop developed by military strategist, John Boyd [5]. The Mitolla architecture
suggests
prediction aspects within the Plan phase, however there have been limited implementations
of predictive
elements within current cognitive radio efforts. Given the latency limitations imposed by
software
defined radio (SDR), any potential to speed up the cognitive process would be highly
beneficial. This
intelligence prediction algorithms towards time-series based metrics and suggests applying
these future
A proactive paradigm would enable the radio to change its behavior before it needs to.
What if a
predictive engine ran in parallel but slightly ahead temporally of a cognitive radio engine?
Could this
predictive engine take in the same real-time environmental observations of „meters‟ that
our current
cognitive engines input in order to create an estimated prediction of the future values of
certain meters?
For example, a prediction engine could observe signal strength in order to provide the
cognitive engine
with advanced notice of potential changes requiring action. This predicted data could be
combined with
other location specific meters such as GPS direction, heading and velocity to enable the
cognitive engine
to make decisions on a faster time frame than using only real time meters. Additionally,
can we use
The technical merit of this research direction includes identifying candidate predictive
algorithms with
most potential for application to cognitive radio, developing fundamental definitions and
metrics for
proactive communications, correlating these metrics against user needs and applications,
identifying the
observable elements required for acceptable prediction and decision making, and even
identifying on the
basic level what constitutes and acceptable prediction as well as how to recover from bad
predictions.
Utilizing time series prediction with cognitive radio is a relatively uncharted area providing
opportunities
for novel contributions. Broader impacts beyond cognitive radio include improving always-
bestconnected paradigms across heterogeneous wireless mediums, smart-grid operations
where predication
capabilities can thwart potential brown outs, and vehicle-to-vehicle communications where
mobility and
promising applications to Cognitive Radio. Metrics for assessing the success of prediction
algorithms are
decision making and learning. Case Based Reasoning combined integrated with
additional optimization
is seen as the most promising method. A novel direction for developing a proactive
communications
Prevalent algorithms from the literature are discussed as well as metrics for assessing
validity of
from developing Proactive Communications architectures, methods, and metrics has the
potential to
enhance the cognitive radio arena and has broader impacts across many disciplines.
Next steps for progressing this research include comparing several predictive
algorithms across the same
environment and data set and under a variety of comparison metrics. Once identified,
prediction modules
can be integrated in with existing cognitive radio architectures where single or multiple
metrics can be
replaced with their predicted values. We can then compare performance with and
without prediction on
the same platform and same data sets. There are many pitfalls and assumptions with
this research
direction that require further identification and assessment. These include that validity of
prediction
algorithms within the random environment of mobile wireless communications and their
capability to
work with truly random events such as intentional jamming. Furthermore, early on a
case must be made
for whether or not the computation expenses of predictive elements provide value
added benefit in terms