Lew Perren
Brighton Business School, University of Brighton, Mithras House, Lewes Road, Brighton BN2 4AT, UK
Tel: 01273 642979; Fax: 01273 642980; Email: L.Perren@brighton.ac.uk
Received: 5th January, 1999; Revised: 16th August, 1999; Accepted: 11th November, 1999
ness and Enterprise Development (JSBED) (Perren, Post, 1996).5 It must also be recognised that many
1999). It developed an empirically veri®ed frame- owner-managers will not wish to pursue growth
work from 16 case studies that explained how (eg Hakim, 1989; Barkham et al., 1996; Watson et
growth was in¯uenced by a myriad interacting al., 1998) and that the diagnostic toolkit will be of
factors. This led to a discussion of the policy little help to them. Thus, the early questions will
implications of the framework. focus on the owner-managers' growth orientation
Part 2 is presented here and explores the man- (G1) to help them decide whether they wish to
agerial implications of the framework. The continue with the rest of the diagnosis.
emphasis moves from a historic analysis of cases to Thirdly, the diagnostic toolkit cannot oer the
a practical agenda for helping owner-managers guarantee of future growth nor its prediction.
and advisers achieve growth. This switch of The complexity of interacting elements is just too
emphasis raises some methodological issues. First, great (eg Runciman, 1999) and, as the part 1 ana-
although the agenda is now more practical, it is lysis showed, many of the factors that in¯uence
still important that an audit trail of evidence is growth are outside the control of the owner-
maintained (Miles and Huberman, 1994). The con- manager. This may leave growth beyond the
version of elements from the framework in part 1 grasp of some owner-managers, even when there
to the diagnostic questions in part 2 needs to be is the possibility of compensation between
systematic and transparent. Tables 1 and 2 provide factors. However, the diagnostic toolkit can oer a
example conversions. They show how there is a systematic process for an owner-manager to
need for elements in the framework to be trans- develop awareness of his or her circumstances, to
lated into more general questions while retaining explore the potential for growth and perhaps to
the underlying meaning. identify opportunities that are currently being
Secondly, the audience has changed from neglected.
academics and policy makers to owner-managers. The diagnostic toolkit will employ a Socratic
Therefore, it is important that the diagnostic questioning approach as a way of unleashing the
questions are presented in an appealing way that owner-manager's intimate knowledge (eg Curran
will make them easy to use. Technical language et al., 1997; Perren et al., 1998)6 of his or her
will be avoided (eg Curran et al., 1997; Perren et business and galvanising it into analysis. Russell
al., 1998),2 the personal pronoun `you' will be (1961) suggests that the Socratic method should
employed to draw the owner-manager into the be used when we already have `knowledge to
process (eg Kirschenbaum and Henderson, 1990)3 come to a right conclusion, but have failed,
and a clear diagrammatic overview provided (eg through confusion of thought or lack of analysis,
De Bono, 1990; Eccles and Nohria, 1992).4 The to make the best logical use of what we know'
metaphor of a `diagnostic toolkit' will be used to (p. 110). The diagnostic toolkit may also act as a
convey functionality and utility (eg Keizer and stimulus for owner-managers to investigate
Table 1: Example elements from an independent factor in¯uencing the interim growth driver resource
access (G3) (excerpt from Table 6 from part 1)
(F12) Debtors and creditors 1 . A supplier oering special terms of business can A,E,F,G,I,J,L,M,N
be a positive in¯uence (in combination with
factor 8)
2 . A supportive bank can be a positive in¯uence B,E,F,G,H,J,K,M,P
3 . Especially quick-paying customers and good C,D,G,K,N
debtor management can be a positive in¯uence.
4 . Poor debtor control can be a negative F
in¯uence.
5 . Cash based business with low stocks can be a I,O
positive in¯uence.
6 . A major bad debt can be a negative in¯uence. N
Table 2: Example questions developed from elements in Table 1 (excerpt from Table 5 from part 2)
G3. Resource access Questions (please skip irrelevant questions) Audit trail
Independent factors
aspects of the business that have been overlooked, in¯uence against an interim growth driver may
even when there is readily available information be counterbalanced by another factor's in¯uence.
(eg Daniels and Henry, 1998).7 The intention is Figure 1 develops this theme by providing a
to encourage `soft analysis' by posing `the right diagnostic toolkit to help micro-enterprise
questions' so `complex issues get opened up to owner-managers and advisers explore the in¯u-
thoughtful consideration instead of being closed ences on the interim growth drivers (G1 to G4),
down prematurely by snap decisions' (Mintzberg, highlight ways of `compensating' de®cits in parti-
1998, pp. 222±223).8 cular factors (F1 to F16) and suggest methods to
help them think creatively about development
THE DIAGNOSTIC TOOLKIT opportunities.
Now the methodological issues have been The factors in Figure 1 are grouped into three
explored, it is timely to present the diagnostic categories, illustrated by dierent shapes.10 Hexa-
toolkit. The analysis in part 1 suggested that, for a gons represent those factors that will require a
business to achieve growth beyond the micro- degree of self-awareness on the part of the owner-
enterprise phase, the combined in¯uence of the manager and, to some extent, may be viewed as
independent factors on all four of the interim part of his or her psychological make-up. The psy-
growth drivers (G1 owner's growth motivation, chological make-up of individuals that start up
G2 expertise in managing growth, G3 resource businesses has caused considerable discussion over
access and G4 demand) must be positive.9 An the years (eg Chell et al., 1991; Shaver and Scott,
interim growth driver can be in¯uenced by a 1991; Chell and Pittaway, 1998); indeed Daryl
number of dierent independent factors. This Mitton (1989) described research in this area as `a
introduces the possibility of `compensation', the theory jungle'. The approach here is pragmatic; a
phenomenon where a de®cit in one factor's trek through this theory jungle is outside the scope
Key
Factors that are pervasive and the owner-manager has little control over.
Growth of Micro-enterprise.
of this paper. The hexagons merely suggest, in a factor. Octagons represent those factors (mostly
common-sense way, that diagnosing these factors internal to the business) over which the owner-
will require the owner-manager to consider his or manager has more control. There has been a long-
her own wishes and feelings. running debate in the strategy literature regarding
Squares represent those factors (mostly external) the level of control that a business can have over its
that exercise a pervasive in¯uence, rather like grav- aairs (eg Whittington, 1993) and various schools
ity.11 The owner-manager may be able to adjust of thought have emerged (eg Mintzberg, 1998).12
the strategy of the micro-enterprise to take account Becoming entangled in this debate would be an
of these factors or look for compensation, but he unhelpful distraction, so a pragmatic approach is
or she can exercise little in¯uence over the actual adopted. Indeed, some researchers in the strategy
area have themselves recently been calling for more `investing' friends etc (F9) and competitive
pragmatic approaches (eg Jones, 1998).13 The dynamics (F16).
square and octagons categories are not intended to
be absolute, they merely indicate, in a common- Diagnosing and compensating for expertise in
sense way, the level of control that an owner- managing growth (G2)
manager is likely to have over a given factor. Table 4 converts elements from the framework in
Now an overview of the diagnostic toolkit has part 1 to provide questions that diagnose and com-
been provided, it is timely to focus on the diagno- pensate for expertise in managing growth (G2).
sis and compensation of the interim growth dri- The questions focus on ®ve potential in¯uencing
vers. Each interim growth driver will be factors: transferable support skills (F7); key
considered in turn, and a table detailing the diag- employees (F10); family, `investing' friends etc
nostic questions provided. (F9); active professional advisers (F11) and transfer-
able network of contacts (F8).
Diagnosing and compensating for owner's
growth motivation (G1) Diagnosing and compensating for resource
Table 3 converts elements from the framework in access (G3)
part 1 to provide questions that diagnose and com- Table 5 converts elements from the framework in
pensate for owner's growth motivation (G1). part 1 to provide questions that diagnose and com-
The questions focus on ®ve potential in¯uencing pensate for resource access (G3). The questions
factors: desire to succeed (F2); desire to be `one's focus on seven potential in¯uencing factors: active
own boss' (F1); active risk taker (F3); family and risk taker (F3); debtors and creditors (F12); transfer-
Table 3: Diagnosing and compensating for the interim growth driver owner's growth motivation (G1)
G1. Owner's growth motivation Questions (please skip irrelevant questions) Audit trail
Independent factors
Table 4: Diagnosing and compensating for the interim growth driver expertise in managing growth (G2)
G2. Expertise in managing Questions (please skip irrelevant questions) Audit trail
growth
Independent factors
Table 5: Diagnosing and compensating for the interim growth driver resource access (G3)
G3. Resource access Questions (please skip irrelevant questions) Audit trail
Independent factors
Table 5: Continued
Table 6: Diagnosing and compensating for the interim growth driver demand (G4)
Table 6: Continued
. How focused are you on the technical side of the business compared
with its marketing?
. What steps can you take to become even more focused on the
market?
(F3) Active risk taker . How willing are you to take on challenging or risky orders? Element 1
. When do you turn down customers because their requirements are &2
too large or too risky?
. When do you need to take on larger or more dicult orders to
stimulate growth?
. What steps can you take to assess the risk of taking on larger or Element 1
more dicult orders?
(F2) Desire to succeed . What particular markets do you like to serve even though there are
more lucrative customers elsewhere?
. Why do you like to serve these markets?
. What particular technical areas do you like to operate in even
though there are more pro®table areas?
. What new markets could you move to?
(F10) Key employees, partners Re¯ecting on others' skills and attitudes Element 1
etc & (F9) Family, `investing' . What employees, partners or family members have good sales &2
friends etc abilities? Element 1
. How can you make the most of them?
(F10) Key employees, partners . What problems might arise with such employees, partners or family
etc members? Element 3
. What employees or partners have key technical skills?
. How can you make the most of them?
. What customer contacts do your employees have that could be Element 5
helpful?
. How can you attract employees or partners that have customer
contacts? Element 4
. How can you make the most of such contacts?
. What are the risks of an employee or partner setting-up in
competition?
What steps can you take to stop partners setting-up in competition?
Summing-up
. How would you summarise the factors in¯uencing demand?
. What are the opportunities for compensation between factors?
. What actions are you going to take now?
more powerful than words for conveying the power of the famous tank and the formal-
ideas because, unlike words, they exist comple- ity of the ocer in the Roman army.
tely at one moment in time' and they engage 6. Curran et al.'s (1997) investigation of pricing
right-brain thinking that perceives patterns in small businesses found that, while the meth-
and relationships. Eccles and Nohria (1992) ods of information provision were informal,
also point to the importance of diagrams when they supported quite sophisticated decision
communicating a message to managers, they making. Perren et al. (1998) found that
suggest that the success of the Boston Consult- owner-managers of successful growth-orien-
ing Group's growth/share matrix is in part due tated service sector businesses developed inti-
to the ease of its pictorial representation. mate tacit knowledge of their businesses.
5. Keizer and Post (1996) suggest that metaphors 7. Daniels and Henry (1998) suggest that man-
oer a powerful way for managers to com- agers can become prisoners of their mental
municate change. They suggest that Phillip's models and only accept `con®rmatory' infor-
use of the Centurion metaphor for its change mation. The diagnostic toolkit may help man-
programme may have evoked the image of agers to breakout of their mental cage.
8. The following websites helped with framing Keizer, J. A. and Post, G. J. J. (1996) `The Metaphoric
open questions: www.ifaassociates.com, Gap as a Catalyst of Change', in C. Oswick and
www.williecrawford.com, www.consults- D. Grant (eds) Organisation Development: Metapho-
kills.com and talec.ntu.ac.uk. rical Explorations, Pitman, London.
Kirschenbaum, H. and Henderson, V. L. (1990) The
9. An intervening factor emerges as a function of
Carl Rogers Reader, Constable, London.
an independent factor(s) acting in a given
Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M. (1994) `Qualitative
situation, `and helps to conceptualise and Data Analysis', Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
explain the in¯uence of the independent' fac- Mintzberg, H. (1998) `The Fall and Rise of Strategic
tor(s) on the dependent factor (Sekaran, 1992, Planning', in B. de Wit and R. Meyer (eds)
p. 70). Strategy: Process, Context, Content, International
10. This idea was stimulated by one of the anony- Thomson, London (adapted version of an article
mous reviewers. originally in the Harvard Business Review).
11. This example was taken from another source, Mitton, D. G. (1989) `The Compleat Entrepreneur',
but the precise reference cannot be remembered. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 13(3), 9±19.
12. Mintzberg (1998) provides a helpful summary Perren, L. (2000) `Factors in the Growth of Micro-
of the dierent schools of thought. Enterprises (Part 1): Developing a Framework',
Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development,
13. Jones (1998) calls for observers not to be over-
6(4), 366±385.
whelmed by the dierent strategic perspectives
Perren, L., Berry, A. and Partridge, M. (1998) `The Evo-
and that they should be `melded together in a lution Of Management Information, Control And
practical situation' (p. 427). Decision-Making Processes in Small Growth
Oriented Service Sector Businesses: Exploratory
REFERENCES Lessons from Four Cases of Success', Journal of Small
Barkham, R., Hart, M. and Harvey, E. (1996) `Growth Business and Enterprise Development, 5(4), 351±362.
in Small Manufacturing Firms: An Empirical Reason, P. (1994) `Three Approaches to Participative
Analysis', in R. Blackburn and P. Jennings (eds) Inquiry', in N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds)
Small Firms: Contributions to Economic Regeneration, Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage, Thousand
Paul Chapman, London. Oaks, CA.
Chell, E. and Pittaway, L. (1998) `The Social Con- Robertson, M. (1994) `Strategic Issues Impacting on
struction of Entrepreneurship', paper presented to Small Firms: their Promise, their Role, their Pro-
the 21st ISBA National Small Firms Policy and blems and Vulnerability, their Future and the Way
Research Conference, Durham, November. Forward', paper presented to the 17th National
Chell, E., Haworth, J. and Brearley, S. (1991) The Small Firms' Policy and Research Conference.
Entrepreneurial Personality, Routledge, London. Runciman, W. G. (1999) The Social Animal, Fontana
Curran, J., Jarvis, R., Kitching, J. and Lightfoot, G. Press, London.
(1997) `The Pricing Decision in Small Firms: Russell, B. (1961) History of Western Philosophy,
Complexities and Deprioritising of Economic Unwin, London.
Determinants', International Small Business Journal, Sekaran, U. (1992) Research Methods for Business: A Skill
15(2), 17±32. Building Approach, Wiley, Chichester.
Daniels, K. and Henry, J. (1998) `Strategy: a Cognitive Shaver, K. G. and Scott, L. R. (1991) `Person, Process,
Perspective', in S. Segal-Horn (ed.) The Strategy Choice: The Psychology of New Venture Creation'
Reader, Open University Press, Milton Keynes Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(2), 23±45.
and Blackwell, Oxford. Stanworth, J. and Gray, C. (eds) (1991) Bolton 20 years
De Bono, E. (1990) Atlas of Management Thinking, Pen- On: The Small Firm in the 1990s, Paul Chapman,
guin, London. London.
Eccles, R. G. and Nohria, N. (1992) `Beyond the Hype: Storey, D. J. (1994) Understanding the Small Firm Sector,
Rediscovering the Essence of Management', Routledge, London.
Harvard Business Review, reprinted in S. Segal- Watson, K., Hogarth-Scott, S. and Wilson, N. (1998)
Horn (ed.) The Strategy Reader, Open University `Small Business Start-ups: Success Factors and
Press, Milton Keynes and Blackwell, Oxford. Support Implications', International Journal of Entre-
Hakim, C. (1989) `Identifying Fast Growth Small preneurial Behaviour & Research, 4(3), 217±238.
Firms', Employment Gazette, (January), 29±41. Whittington, R. (1993) What is Strategy and Does it
Jones, G. (1998) `Perspectives on Strategy', in S. Matter, Routledge, London.
Segal-Horn (ed.) The Strategy Reader, Open
University Press, Milton Keynes and Blackwell, Dr Lew Perren, University of Brighton, Brighton
Oxford. Business School.