Short communication
A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T
Article history: Pure metastable b-MnS thin films have been deposited by chemical bath deposition (CBD) method and
Received 26 July 2010 subsequently annealed in a Na2S solution (denoted as hydrothermal annealing). The effects of
Received in revised form 18 November 2010 preparative parameters and hydrothermal annealing on structure, morphology and optical property of
Accepted 6 December 2010
the films have been investigated. Experimental results indicate that the crystalline b-MnS thin films can
Available online xxx
be prepared at a low concentration of Mn and S ions without using any organic chelator. The as-
deposited b-MnS can be transformed to g-phase MnS after the hydrothermal treatment in an autoclave
Keywords:
at 200 8C for 1 h. The estimated Eg values are in the range of 3.15–3.18 eV.
A. Thin films
B. Chemical synthesis
Published by Elsevier Ltd.
C. X-ray diffraction
D. Phase transactions
D. Optical properties
Please cite this article in press as: Y. Shi, et al., Mater. Res. Bull. (2010), doi:10.1016/j.materresbull.2010.12.009
G Model
MRB-4985; No. of Pages 4
2. Experimental Also, the CBD bath should contain Mn salt and a suitable
complexing agent to have soluble species of Mn2+ in the aqueous
2.1. Preparation of MnS thin films medium. In this study, NH3/NH4Cl was used as buffer to fix the
solution pH values and ammonia to control Mn2+ concentration,
Microscope glass slides of 26 mm 76 mm 1 mm dimension according to the following reaction:
were used as substrates. Before the deposition the substrates were
first etched with diluted hydrochloric acid (5%), then degreased MnðNH3 Þ4 2þ $ 4NH3 þ Mn2þ (2)
with ethanol, ultrasonically cleaned with purified deionized water
Finally, the initial concentration of Mn2+ and S2 ions in the
and finally dried in air.
mixed solution also plays an important role in the growth of MnS
The chemicals used for the preparation were AR grade. Pure
thin film. From previous studies, it should be noted that
b-MnS thin films was deposited using freshly prepared aqueous
triethanolamine (TEA) was usually used as a complexing agent
solutions of 10 mL of 0.25 mol/L Mn(CH3COO)2, 10 mL NH3/
to ensure the slow release of Mn2+ ions [17,20]. However, at a low
NH4Cl buffer solution (pH 10.5), 10 mL of 0.25 mol/L CH3CSNH2
initial concentration of Mn and/or S ions, the addition of TEA may
and 20 mL deionized water. The reactants mentioned above
result in a too low Mn2+ concentration in bath solution and cause a
were mixed well in 50 mL beakers with constant stirring. Then
non-uniform and discontinuous film formation, as reported by
the pre-treated substrates were introduced vertically into the
Lokhande et al. [17]. In this study, without the addition of TEA, b-
beakers when the solution temperature was appropriate. The
MnS was successfully obtained at the lower concentrations of Mn
deposition parameters such as temperature and growth time
and S ions (0.25 mol/L), which is only a quarter of the concentra-
have been optimized and the films prepared in this study were
tion for the synthesis of g-MnS in the previous report [20].
under the fixed synthesis conditions: bath temperature
The total formation of MnS film could be presented from the
(T) = 60 8C, and time (t) = 4 h.
formula (3):
The as-deposited b-MnS films were further hydrothermal
treated in a sealed Teflon-lined autoclave with 1 M Na2S solution at Mn2þ þ CH3 CSNH2 þ 2OH Ð MnS þ CH3 CSNH2 þ H2 O (3)
200 8C for 1 h to investigate the annealing effects.
The film thickness was measured from the scanning electron The XRD patterns of as-deposited and hydrothermal annealed
image (SEM) of the cross-section of the sample. The thickness of MnS thin film are shown in Fig. 1a and b, respectively. The (1 1 1)
the prepared MnS thin film is found to be about 0.6 mm. The and (2 2 0) peaks at 27.58 and 45.78 (Fig. 1a) exhibit the metastable
structure characterization of MnS films was carried out by a X-ray b-MnS (cubic phase) with lattice constant a = 0.5610 nm (JCPDS,
diffractometer (D/Max-2500, Rigaku Corp.) using Cu Ka radiations. no. 40-1288). The average crystallite size calculated by Scherer’s
The microstructure of the films was studied by transmission formula is 20.8 nm, indicating that the as-deposited b-MnS film is
electron microscopy (TEM) using a Philips TecnaiG2 F20 micro- made up of nanocrystal particles.
scope operating at 200 kV. Optical properties were determined by The hydrothermal annealed film showed several additional
using a JASCO V-570 UV–vis–NIR spectrometer. peaks at 25.68, 29.28 and 50.08 (Fig. 1b), which can be indexed to
(1 0 0), (1 0 1) and (1 0 3) planes of g-MnS (JCPDS, no. 40-1289).
The emergence of a new g-phase may be due to the fact that b-
3. Results and discussion
phase has the lowest free energy for the formation of the MnS
polytypes, followed closely by that of the g-phase [2]. Therefore, b-
3.1. Reaction mechanism
MnS is easily transformed to g-MnS when hydrothermally treated
at 200 8C in this study. Moreover, the intensity of the (1 1 1) plane
The morphology, particle size, optical properties and especial
the crystalline phase of MnS films are critically dependent on the
preparative conditions of CBD technique. The aqueous solution of
Mn(CH3COO)2 was used as Mn2+ source and thioacetamide as S2
source during the MnS deposition. The deposition of MnS occurs
when the ionic product of Mn2+ and S2 exceeds the solubility
product of MnS. The slow release of Mn2+ and S2 ions is the basis
for condense ion-by-ion CBD thin film. According to the early
reports [18–20], three aspects may play the main roles in obtaining
the crystalline CBD MnS thin films.
The first one involves the bath temperature and time. Initial
higher bath temperature favors the formation of crystalline thin
films. It was reported that the MnS film deposited at 30 8C for 3 h is
amorphous while the film deposited at 60 8C consists of phase-
pure g-MnS [20]. As mentioned above, in this study the optimized
bath temperature is 60 8C and bath time is 4 h.
The second one is related to the pH value, which is crucial to the
control of the concentration of S2 ions in the CBD synthesis. The
MnS film is commonly obtained from an aqueous alkaline bath, in
which thioacetamide is used to decompose to yield S2 ions. The
release rate of S2 ions is associated with pH values according to
the following formula:
Fig. 1. X-ray diffraction patterns of as-deposited and annealed (at 200 8C in Na2S
solution for 1 h) MnS thin films (a) as-deposited MnS thin film and (b) annealed
2
CH3 CSNH2 þ 2OH Ð CH3 CONH2 þ S þ H2 O (1) MnS thin films.
Please cite this article in press as: Y. Shi, et al., Mater. Res. Bull. (2010), doi:10.1016/j.materresbull.2010.12.009
G Model
MRB-4985; No. of Pages 4
Fig. 3. Plot of optical absorption vs. wavelength of MnS thin films for (a) as
deposited and (b) annealed at 200 8C in Na2S solution for 1 h.
For TEM studies of the prepared samples, the MnS thin film
deposited on glass substrate was scratched and placed onto a piece
of amorphous carbon coated copper grid. Fig. 2a shows the TEM
image of the as-deposited b-MnS thin film. The morphology of this
sample exhibits an irregular layer structure. The selected area
electron diffraction patterns shown in the inset of Fig. 2a, together
with high resolution TEM image (Fig. 2b), confirm that the lattice
spacing d is 0.32 nm, corresponding to the typical (1 1 1) plane of
b-MnS (JCPDS, no. 40-1288). This value is in good agreement with
the XRD results (see Fig. 1a). Fig. 2b shows the TEM images of b-
MnS thin films after the hydrothermal treatment. It can be seen
that the width of the layer structure increases and the boundaries
becomes more distinct and compact. These TEM observations,
together with XRD results, indicate that the post-deposition
hydrothermal annealing can effectively improve the crystallinity
of the as-deposited MnS thin films.
Fig. 2. TEM (a) and HRTEM (b) of as-deposited MnS thin films and TEM (c) of MnS
thin films annealed at 200 8C in Na2S solution for 1 h.
Fig. 4. Plot of (ahn)2 vs. ‘hn’ of MnS thin films for (a) as deposited (b) annealed at
200 8C in Na2S solution for 1 h.
Please cite this article in press as: Y. Shi, et al., Mater. Res. Bull. (2010), doi:10.1016/j.materresbull.2010.12.009
G Model
MRB-4985; No. of Pages 4
[1] T. Dietl, H. Ohno, F. Matsukura, J. Cibert, D. Ferrand, Science 287 (2000) 1019–1022.
UV–vis absorption spectra of the as-deposited b-MnS thin film [2] F.M. Michel, M.A.A. Schoonen, X.V. Zhang, S.T. Martin, J.B. Parise, Chem. Mater. 18
and annealed mixed phases (b and g) MnS thin film are shown in (2006) 1726–1736.
Fig. 3. The absorption edge at around 345 nm for both MnS thin [3] S.A. Mayen-Hernandez, S. Jimenez-Sandoval, R. Castanedo-Perez, G. Torres-Del-
gado, B.S. Chao, O. Jimenez-Sandoval, J. Cryst. Growth 256 (2003) 12–19.
films, is almost the same as the reported value of the metastable [4] J. Mu, Z.F. Gu, L. Wang, Z.Q. Zhang, H. Sun, S.Z. Kang, J. Nanopartic. Res. 10 (2008)
form of MnS nanoparticles at 325/345 nm [24,25]. In addition, an 197–201.
absorption band appears at 440 nm in Fig. 3, which may be [5] L. Jun, Q. Pengfei, Y.i. Peng, M. Zhao yu, Y. Zhiping, Y. Weichao, Q. Yitai, Chem.
Mater. 13 (2001) 2169–2172.
attributed to the electron transition between the sulfur ion and [6] X.H. Zhang, Y.Q. Chen, C. Jia, Q.T. Zhou, Y. Su, B. Peng, S. Yin, M.J. Xin, Mater. Lett. 62
manganese ion [26,27]. (2008) 125–127.
The optical absorption data was analyzed from Eq. (4) in order [7] I. Oidor-Juarez, P. Garcia-Jimenez, G. Torres-Delgado, R. Castanedo-Perez, O.
Jimenez-Sandoval, B. Chao, S. Jimenez-Sandoval, Mater. Res. Bull. 37 (2002)
to determine the bandgap value of direct bandgap semiconductors
1749–1754.
[28]: [8] Z. Pingtang, Z. Qiumei, H. Xianliang, T. Hao, H. Kaixun, J. Cryst. Growth (2008)
4268–4272.
1=2
Aðhn Eg Þ [9] A. Changhua, T. Kaibin, L. Xianming, L. Fanqing, Z. Guien, Q. Yitai, J. Cryst. Growth
a¼ (4) 252 (2003) 575–580.
hn [10] L. David, C. Bradford, X. Tang, T.C.M. Graham, K.A. Prior, B.C. Cavenett, J. Cryst.
Growth 251 (2003) 591–595.
where a is the absorption coefficient, hn is the photon energy and
[11] J.P. Ge, Y.D. Li, Chem. Commun. (2003) 2498–2499.
Eg is the optical band gap, A is a constant relative to the material. [12] H.M. Pathan, S.S. Kale, C.D. Lokhande, S.H. Han, O.S. Joo, Mater. Res. Bull. 42 (2007)
The absorption coefficient a was evaluated from measurements of 1565–1569.
optical absorbance (A) and film thickness (d) using the formula [13] C. Vargas-Hernandez, V.C. Lara, J.E. Vallejo, J.F. Jurado, O. Giraldo, Phys. Status
Solidi B Basic Solid State Phys. 242 (2005) 1897–1901.
[29]: [14] M. Lakshmi, K. Bindu, S. Bini, K.P. Vijayakumar, C.S. Kartha, T. Abe, Y. Kashiwaba,
Thin Solid Films 370 (2000) 89–95.
1 A [15] M. Lakshmi, K. Bindu, S. Bini, K.P. Vijayakumar, C.S. Kartha, T. Abe, Y. Kashiwaba,
a¼ (5) Thin Solid Films 386 (2001) 127–132.
d log e
[16] P. Pramanik, M.A. Akhter, P.K. Basu, Thin Solid Films 158 (1988) 271–275.
The curve of (ahn)2 vs. hn is plotted in Fig. 4, and the Eg value of [17] C.D. Lokhande, A. Ennaoui, P.S. Patil, M. Giersig, M. Muller, K. Diesner, H. Tributsch,
Thin Solid Films 330 (1998) 70–75.
the product can be estimated by extrapolating the straight line [18] M. Dhanam, B. Kavitha, M. Shanmugapriya, Chalcogenide Lett. 6 (2009) 541–547.
portion of the plot of (ahn) vs. hn = 0. The estimated Eg values of as- [19] C. Gumus, C. Ulutas, Y. Ufuktepe, Opt. Mater. 29 (2007) 1183–1187.
deposited and annealed film are 3.18 eV and 3.15 eV, which fall [20] D.B. Fan, H. Wang, Y.C. Zhang, H. Cheng, B. Wang, H. Yan, Mater. Chem. Phys. 80
(2003) 44–47.
within the range of the bandgap energies reported for MnS thin [21] S. Erat, H. Metin, M. Ari, Mater. Chem. Phys. 111 (2008) 114–120.
film [7,17,19]. [22] J. Hiie, T. Dedova, V. Valdna, K. Muska, Thin Solid Films 511 (2006) 443–447.
[23] S.D. Sartale, B.R. Sankapal, M. Lux-Steiner, A. Ennaoui, Thin Solid Films 480 (2005)
168–172.
Acknowledgements
[24] Y.H. Zheng, Y. Cheng, Y.S. Wang, L.H. Zhou, F. Bao, C. Jia, J. Phys. Chem. B 110 (2006)
8284–8288.
This work is supported by the National Basic Research Program [25] Y.W. Jun, Y.Y. Jung, J. Cheon, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 (2002) 615–619.
[26] S.S. Aplesnin, L.I. Ryabinkina, G.M. Abramova, O.B. Romanova, A.M. Vorotynov,
of China (grant no. 2011CB936002), the doctoral scientific
D.A. Velikanov, N.I. Kiselev, A.D. Balaev, Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys.
research foundation of Liaoning Province of China (grant no. 71 (2005), 125201–125208–125204.
20071088), the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Univer- [27] M. Wakaki, T. Ogawa, T. Arai, Nuovo Cimento Della Societa Italiana Di Fisica D-
sities (grant no. DUT10LK22) and the Specialized Research Fund Condens. Matter At. Mol. Chem. Phys. Fluids Plasmas Biophys. 2 (1983) 1809–
1813.
for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (grant no. [28] Y. Shi, Z.G. Jin, C.Y. Li, H.S. An, J.J. Qiu, Thin Solid Films 515 (2007) 3339–3343.
200801411065). [29] T.X. Wang, W.W. Chen, Chem. Eng. J. 144 (2008) 146–148.
Please cite this article in press as: Y. Shi, et al., Mater. Res. Bull. (2010), doi:10.1016/j.materresbull.2010.12.009