Anda di halaman 1dari 6

Land Exchange

Update Western Land Exchange Project


Seattle, Washington
Spring 2005 Research, Advocacy, & Outreach for Land Exchange Policy Reform Vol. 9, No. 1

WLXP sues over Mormons’ de facto control of public site


W
estern Land Exchange Project and four a bill to sell Martin’s Cove and surrounding public
individual plaintiffs—including two descen- land to the Church. Opposition from Wyoming’s
dents of Mormon pioneers—have sued the congressional delegation and many citizens scuttled
Department of Interior and BLM
for abdicating their management respon-
sibilities at Martin’s Cove, a national
historic site in Wyoming. At the instruc-
tion of Congress, Interior has entered
into a 25-year lease that effectively cedes
management of the site, which is federal
land, to the Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-day Saints (LDS). Plaintiffs believe
this violates the First Amendment’s pro-
hibition on government establishment
of any religion. The national office of All visitors to Martin’s Cove must enter through Church property at
the ACLU is representing the plaintiffs. the Mormon Handcart Visitors Center. PHOTO: WLXP
The complaint can be read at http://
www.aclu.org/ReligiousLiberty/ReligiousLiberty. that bill. However, before retiring at the close of the
cfm?ID=17685&c=29. 107th Congress, Hansen was successful in getting a bill
passed that codified the 25-year lease.
Martin’s Cove, near the Sweetwater River about
55 miles southwest of Casper, is situated along the While this case differs from our past litigation,
four major historic westward migration routes: the WLXP’s interest in the Martin’s Cove issue is consis-
Oregon, California, Mormon Pioneer, and Pony tent with our mission to keep public lands in public
Express Trails. It has been listed on the ownership and control. The BLM is osten-
National Register of Historic Places since
“Plaintiffs maintain that the sibly still the manager of Martin’s Cove,
1977. The site is significant to the LDS Church cannot act as gate- but the agency has allowed a religious
Church because in 1856 Mormon pio- organization to monitor activities at and
neers traveling west with handcarts were keeper or storyteller for prop- manage interpretation of a unique historic
trapped by a severe early winter storm site. We believe LDS members have every
near the Cove, and several perished.
erty that everyone agrees has right to visit Martin’s Cove to experi-

The Church initially tried to acquire historic value beyond its sig- ence an important part of their religious
history, but we object to the pervasive
Martin’s Cove outright. A land exchange
proposal fell through when the Church
nificance to the LDS Church.” Church-authorized message, presented to
the exclusion of other messages or inter-
failed to offer the BLM lands of equiva- Complaint filed by ACLU pretations of American history. All people
lent significance. In 2002, then-Con- in Western Land Exchange should be able to visit public lands without
gressman Jim Hansen (R-UT) introduced Project v. Norton. the imposition of any religious message.
Mining company seeks
Past issues of our congressional land deal in Arizona
R
esolution Copper, a joint venture of Rio
newsletter, Land
Exchange Update,
Tinto and Broken Hill Properties, two Nevada lands sold without court-
are available in the
of the world’s largest mining compa-
nies, has prepared draft legislation to seize ordered analysis
O
ownership of 3,025 acres of federal land n February 9, the Bureau of Land
Reading Room of Management auctioned off 13,300
known as Oak Flat, with plans for a future
our website, copper mine. The company would offer in acres of federal land in Lincoln County,
www.westlx.org trade scattered parcels near public lands. Nevada for more than $47 million. The
Resolution Copper is lobbying the Arizona land, which had been appraised at $12.4
congressional delegation to sponsor legis- million, is just north of Mesquite, Nevada.
lation the company itself has drafted. In 2002, the Western Land Exchange Proj-
ect successfully sued BLM for trying to sell
The draft legislation is loaded with gifts for
the land without sufficiently analyzing the
Resolution. Most notable is the revocation
environmental impact of privatization and
of a 1955 Executive Order that expressly
development. (Land Exchange Update,
prohibited mining at Oak Flat, a popular
Spring 2004, Summer 2004). Congress
recreation area about an hour’s drive from
later intervened by passing the Lincoln
Phoenix. The bill cagily avoids any men-
County Development, Recreation, and
tion of the executive order.
Conservation Act of 2004, which ordered
The draft bill sidesteps the environmen- the sale within 75 days of the Act’s pas-
tal analysis normally required under the sage. BLM relied on the Act to evade the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). analysis the court had ordered as a result
Environmental consequences could be of our lawsuit. The agency claims analysis
substantial, given that the bill expedites will nonetheless be completed as part of an
a mining operation, but Resolution has EIS for other federal projects in the area.
“The Bonanza is little interest in studying (or revealing) We’ll see.
the impacts of de-watering, mine tailings,
BACK.” and soil subsidence. The bill would also
—Government bro- let Resolution select and pay the appraiser
who would put a value to both the private Federal land in Lincoln County, Nevada
chure for Lincoln was recently auctioned off after Congress
and federal lands.
County land auction expedited its sale and swept aside a WLXP
lawsuit. Photo: WLXP

Land Exchange Update  Spring 2005


Everybody has plans for Las Vegas land sale money
S
ince the late 1980s, the Las Vegas Valley land values and address the previous tax-
has been the fastest-growing metropoli- payer ripoffs, the bill created a 27,000-acre
tan area in the country. But developers land “disposal” area within which BLM-
seeking more land for subdivisions have managed lands would be put up for auc-
been faced with a thorny problem: most of tion and sold to the highest bidders. The
the Valley (and 83 percent of Nevada over- law allocates the proceeds of the land sales
all) consists of federal land. In the eighties as follows:
and nineties, developers engaged in land
• 85 percent goes to a Special Account
exchanges with the federal government in
managed by the BLM in Nevada for the
order to obtain land in Las Vegas—often
acquisition of environmentally sensitive
by purchasing and then trading land along
land, “capital improvements” at federal
Lake Tahoe, where the federal government
areas such as Lake Mead and the Desert
was actively acquiring land to protect the
Wildlife Refuge, and park-and endan-
Lake.
gered species habitat-related projects.
But the booming Las Vegas market and
• 10 percent goes to the Southern Nevada
corrupt practices within the Bureau of
Water Authority.
Land Management (BLM) resulted in
a host of terrible land deals that richly • 5 percent goes to the State for educa-
rewarded the developers and ripped off tion.
the public, with federal acreage going Proceeds from federal land sales normally
for prices far below its actual market go to the federal Treasury, and this was the
value. The Interior Department Inspec- first time such a deal had been made to
tor General conducted several audits of keep the money in state.
land trades in the Valley in the 1990s, and
the problems the IG discovered were so Revenues were originally projected to
severe that the BLM was ordered to halt all equal about $70 million a year, but the
exchanges there. high bids that Las Vegas land ultimately
won vastly exceeded the minimum bids
In 1998, Congress passed the Southern established through appraisal. As of the
Nevada Public Land Management Act last sale, the program has generated $2
(SNPLMA), as a direct response to the billion.
land exchange scandals—and a new way to
open up federal land for development. In Even before it was evident that the land
the hope of dealing with the volatility of sales were a phenomenal cash cow, Nevada

The SNPLMA has


greatly accelerated the
Mojave Desert’s con-
version to golf courses
and subdivisions.
Photo: Janice Naragon

Land Exchange Update  Spring 2005


Rep. Jim Gibbons began scheming to
redirect the Special Account money away Congratulations to Mayor-elect and
from any purchase of new federal land
and toward local use, such as allocating WLXP member Tony Gioia!
30 percent or more to the State for educa- Our long-time friend
tion. As it is, there has been plenty of local and colleague Tony
benefit—Clark County and its cities have Gioia has just been
received half a billion dollars for “capital elected mayor of Camp
improvements” in the form of recreation Verde, Arizona. Since
developments in Clark County and its 1999, Tony and WLXP
cities. have worked together
to keep the Yavapai
The remaining funds have drawn more Ranch Land Exchange
insidious attention from Washington, from getting through
D.C. Early this year, the Bush Administra- Mayor Tony Gioia Congress, and the bill
tion declared its intention to capture 70 of Camp Verde. failed for five years
percent of the land sale funds and dump in a row. This year, it
the money into the Treasury as an offset appears that it may pass in both cham-
against the huge federal deficit. bers—but not for lack of dedication on the
Nevada politicians went ballistic at this part of Tony and many other Verde Valley
notion and have vowed to keep the money citizens. The land exchange, which would
in Nevada, where they have plenty of plans privatize national forest land in Camp
for it. Rep. Jim Gibbons (R-NV) wants the Verde, was a defining issue in the mayoral
State’s allocation to rise to 35 percent. election; Tony’s opponent was a strong
Senator Ensign (R-NV) proposed last year supporter of the trade and the develop-
that $200 million from the fund be re- ment it would facilitate. Through his work
directed toward replacing grass at local on water, economic, and public land issues
parks with xeriscaping. (A fine idea, but in his hometown, Tony exemplifies the
with federal money?). And in the latest true grassroots citizen activist.
round of sales, the top nominee for Special
Account purchase by the federal govern-
ment was a casino near Lake Mead in Western Land Exchange Project
which Ensign’s father and siblings own a P.O. Box 95545
large share. Seattle, WA 98145-2545
phone 206.325.3503
Congressional staffers say it is unlikely that fax 206.325.3515
the SNPLMA money will be re-directed, www.westlx.org
but the controversy serves as a reminder
that to some politicians, federal land is
just another form of currency—and just as
Board of Directors
Rebecca Rundquist, Pres., Portland, ME
capable of provoking unbridled greed. Marianne Dugan, Eugene, OR
Sandy Lonsdale, Bend, OR

Our two books, “Commons or Commodity: Staff


Janine Blaeloch, Director,
the Dilemma of Federal Land Exchanges” blaeloch@westlx.org

and “The Citizens’ Guide to Federal Land Christopher Krupp, Staff Attorney,
krupp@westlx.org
Exchanges” have been a boon to besieged Joanne Hedou, Program Coordinator,
public lands devotees. Both are available hedou@westlx.org

on our website, www.westlx.org. Graphic Design: HoffmanGraphics.com

Land Exchange Update  Spring 2005


Foundation Supporters ginia Gipson, David Gladstone, Robert
W. & E.G.Green, Charles Hancock, Ann
We gratefully acknowledge the support Harvey, R.J. & Annie Haskins, Joanne
of the following foundations: Hedou, Randall Holmberg, Roland Hoyt,
Anonymous Foundation Thomas Rhodes Hundley, Michael Frome
Ben & Jerry’s Foundation & June Eastvold, Justin Hanson & Karyn
Biodiversity Northwest Moldenhauer, Fayette Krause, Dave Kaiser
Conservation and Research Foundation & Kristin Temperly, Joseph Krupp, Jerome
Horizons Foundation & Vicki Krupp, Chris Krupp, David & Teri
Strong Foundation Leibforth, Curtis Lindner, Craig Lorch,
Mike Lyman, Mike Maloney, Brandt
Thank you to our Donors, Mannchen, Louise Mariana, Marion

Members & Supporters Marsh, Joan McClelland, Ann McCon-


nell, Rick McGuire, Laurene McLane, Tom
Our year-end fundraising letter was a Murray, Rachael Paschal Osborn, Dr. John
great success, bringing in almost $7,000, Osborn, Colleen O’Sullivan, Ann Owchar,
with many donating at a higher level than Giancarlo Panagia, Amy Mergen & Paul
in the past. With members who are that Waitrovich, Dr. Forrest Peebles, Sandra
responsive, we know you value our work. Perkins, Everett & Gail Peterson, Jock
Thank you so much! Pribnow, Tom Pringle, James S Reed, Tom
Anonymous, Marlin Ard, Suzanne Arte- Ring, Prof. William Rodgers, Beth Rogers,
mieff, Molly Attell, Harold Bernhardt, Erica Rosenberg, Lin Rowland, Rebecca
Janine Blaeloch, Joann Blalock, Stephan Rundquist, Gordon Schochet, Michael W.
Block, Denise Boggs, Barton Brown, MD, Shurgot, Paul Kampmeier & Stacy Kihl-
Meg Campbell, Robert Castleberry, Betsy strom, Don Steuter, Robert Stivers, Richard
Dennis, David & Martha Doty, Mark Strickland, Andrew Nelson & Teresa Ward,
Drake, Linda Driskill, George Early, Josiah Clifford Titus, Stephen Trimble, W. van
“Jim” Erickson, Jr., Alan & Myra Erwin, Doorninck, Ray Vaughan, Dale & Christine
Deborah Filipelli, William R. Friese Jr., Volz, Chris Vondrasek, William Weber, Nat
Linda Garrison, Bruce Gaynor, Linda & & Jean White, Jennifer Yogi, Raymond
Mark Giesecke, Tony Gioia, Walter & Vir- Ziarno, Don & Trudy Zimmerman

New WLXP publication available on website at www.westlx.org


In past editions of our newsletter, we’ve For several months, Janine has
talked about the new trend in wilderness been working to educate the
advocacy in which federal land trades and public and environmental advo-
giveaways grease the skids for wilderness cates about the perils of quid
protection. The Western Land Exchange pro quo wilderness. In January,
Project has been actively spreading the Janine, Katie Fite of Western
word on this harmful trend. WLXP direc- Watersheds and Russell Heughins
tor Janine Blaeloch and Western Water- of Idaho Wildlife Federation went
sheds Biodiversity Director Katie Fite have to Phoenix to address a national
co-authored a paper called “Quid pro quo policy committee of the Sierra
wilderness—a new threat to public lands.” Club on this issue. The Club
We have posted the 17-page, illustrated, recently opposed two bad bills in
and footnoted paper on our website at Nevada and Idaho, but has voted
http://www.westlx.org/assets/quid-pro-quo. to stay involved in a third bill. In
pdf. We hope you’ll take a look—and May, Janine will participate in a panel on
please pass it on to others who care about this issue as part of a spring colloquium at
public lands. rescott College in Prescott, Arizona.

Land Exchange Update  Spring 2005


Western Land Exchange Project
PO Box 95545
Seattle, WA 98145-2545

Keeping
Public Lands
Out Of
Corporate
Hands

westlx.org

We’re scrappy...and we get the job done!
Please help support our work for public lands by completing this form
and returning it with your tax-deductible membership/donation to the
Western Land Exchange Project
PO Box 95545
Seattle, WA 98145-2545
Phone 206.325-3503 Fax 206.325-3515

Name: ________________________________________________________________________

Address:_______________________________________________________________________

City:_ __________________________________ State: _____________ Zip:_______________

Phone: ________________________________ Fax:____________________________________

Email:_________________________________________________________________________

Affiliations:_ ___________________________________________________________________

q regular $35 q student/optional low rate $20


q contributing $125 q Public Lands Advocate $500+

3/05

Anda mungkin juga menyukai