CHEM
ELSEVIER Journal of Molecular Structure (Theochem) 417 (1997) 247-254
Abstract
Calculations on optimized geometries, atomic net charges and interatomic Mulliken populations as well as relaxation
energies for the carbonylmetallate monoanions Mn(CO);, HFe(C0); and Co(C0); have been carried out by density functional
theory at the local density approximation (LDA) level and at the LDAINL level with further non-local corrections for exchange
and correlation included self-consistently. On comparison with the corresponding hydrides, there were found to be shorter M-C
distances and longer C-O separations in the carbonylmetallate anions. From Mulliken population analysis, it is shown that H+
dissociation from hydride molecules leads the electronic charges on the carbonylmetallate anions to delocalize further on the
carbonyl groups, while the M-C bonding is strengthened and the C-O bonding is weakened. The relaxation energies calculated
are found to be - 63.01, - 82.00 and - 53.54 kJ mol-’ for Mn(CO);, HFe(C0); and Co(CO);, respectively. 8 1997 Elsevicr
Science B.V.
negative charges on these highly reduced transition molecular density and to represent Coulomb and
metal centers for the carbonylmetallate monoanions exchange potentials accurately [ 1 I]. All the calcula-
Mn(CO);, HFe(CO)i and Co(CO),. tions are carried out with a spin-restricted scheme.
Theoretical methods in quantum chemistry may, in The geometry optimization procedure is based on
principle, be applied in organometallic thermo- the analytic gradient method implemented at the
chemistry. However, calculations on large organo- LDA level by Versluis et al. and at the LDA/NL
metallic molecules with the ab initio method are still level by Fan et al. [12]. The optimization uses the
impractical. Thus, much attention has recently been Newton-Raphson method and Hessian is updated
paid to methods based on density functional theory as with the Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno
an alternative to the ab initio scheme. The application strategy [ 131. Convergence is achieved once changes
of approximate density functional theory to organo- in coordinate values are less than 0.01 unit (distances
metallic chemistry has recently been reviewed by are given in atomic units and angles in radians) and
Ziegler and co-workers [5]. We shall, in the present the norm of all gradient vectors is smaller than 0.01.
investigation, make use of approximate density We have fully optimized the geometries of
functional theory with non-local correction terms of Mn(CO);, HFe(C0); and Co(CO), by LDA and
electron exchange and correlation energies for geo- LDA/NL. The geometry of Mn(C0); has been
metry optimizations, bonding energy calculations optimized respectively within the CA,,, Cjv and D1,
and electronic structures for Mn(CO);, HFe(C0); symmetry constraints. The geometry optimization of
and Co(C0);. HFe(CO)i is within the Cjv symmetry constraint. The
geometry of CO(CO), has been optimized respect-
ively within the Cjy and Td symmetry constraints.
2. Computational details For a comparison of the differences in electronic
structure between Mn(C0); and HMn(CO)s, HFe
All reported calculations are carried out by utilizing (CO), and H2Fe(C0)4, and Co(CO)i and
the Amsterdam density functional (ADF) package, HCO(CO)~, the hydrides HMn(CO)S, H2Fe(CO)_,
version 1.1.3. The local density approximation and HCo(CO)d are also calculated by density func-
(LDA) with local exchange and correlation potentials tional theory with the LDA and LDA/NL approxima-
makes use of the parametrization of Vosko et al. [6]. tions. Structure parameters of these hydrides in our
Non-local corrections (NL) with Becke’s non-local calculations are taken from experimental data
exchange correction [7] and Perdew’s non-local obtained by gas-phase electron diffraction [ 131. In
correlation correction [8] are added in each SCF- our work, the calculated relaxation energies [5]a for
consistent cycle. Convergence is achieved once the Mn(CO);, HFe(C0); and Co(CO), represent the
maximum number of elements of the commutator of energies gained when the Mn(CO);, HFe(C0); and
both the Fock matrix and the density matrix is smaller Co(CO), anions rearrange from the geometries
than lo-’ and the norm of the commutator is under taken up in their hydrides HMn(CO)s, H2Fe(CO)$
lo4 in absolute value. The numerical integration pro- and HCo(CO)+
cedure applied for the calculations is the polyhedron
method developed by Velde and co-workers [9]. The
electronic configurations of the molecular systems are 3. Results and discussion
described by an uncontracted triple-c ST0 basis set
[lo] on Mn 3d,4s, Fe 3d,4s, and Co 3d,4s as well as a 3.1. Optimized structures
double-r ST0 basis set on 0 2s,2p, C 2s,2p, and H 1s.
The 0, C and H atoms are given an extra polarization 3.1.1. Mrl(CO)~
function: 0 3d ({3d =2.00); C 3d ({3d =2.20); H 2p The optimized structures of Mn(C0); under the
({+ = 1.25). The inner core shells for all atoms except Cd,,, Cl” and Djh symmetry constraints are presented
the H atom are treated by the frozen core approxima- in Table 1. The crystal structure data from X-ray
tion. A set of auxiliary s, p, d, f and g ST0 functions, analysis are available for the trigonal-bipyramidal
centered on all nuclei, is introduced to fit the Mn(C0); in ]Ni( 1, lo-phen) 31[Mn(CO)tI 2 (see
Z. Chrn et al.Nournal of Molecular Structure (Throchern) 417 (1997) 247-254 219
Table I
Optimized geometries”
HCo(CO),
c-3, LDA/NL” I.801 1.803 I.151 I.148 I .499 98.2 179.9
Exptl’ I.818 I .764 I.141 I.141 I.556 99.7 172.6
- _
’ Key: eq. equatorial: ax, axial. Interatomic distances are given in AngstrGm\.
h Bond angles are given in degrees.
’ Ref. [15].
’ Ref. [S]a.
’ Ret’. 1141.
’ Average value.
p Ref. [ Ih].
h C,,-Fe-C,,.
’ Fe+C,,AO,,.
C,,--Fe-C .I\,
’ Fe-C,,PC,i,.
‘Ref [ 171.
250 2. Chen et ai./Journal of Molecular Structure (Theochem) 417 (1997) 247-254
Table 1). For the purpose of comparison, both the within 0.02 A from the crystal structure data [16]
molecular structure for HMn(CO)S obtained by gas- obtained from X-ray diffraction analysis, except Fe-
phase electron diffraction [14] and the calculated C,, which has a deviation of 0.07 A and Fe-H with a
geometry [5]a of this molecule obtained by DFT at deviation of 0.04 A. We are not able to rationalize the
the LDA/NL level are listed in Table 1. It is found in large deviations between experiment and theory for
Table 1 that the geometries optimized by LDA/NL, in this Fe-C,, distance. For the Fe-H distance, we
general, agree better with experimental structures than expect that at least some of the deviation might be
those optimized by LDA, which is consistent with due to experimental uncertainties in the position of
Ziegler’s calculations [5]a. Thus, in this text we the H atom. On the other hand, the calculated bond
shall mainly discuss the results calculated by LDA/ angles are within 0.5” from experimental observations
NL. Our calculations show that for the structures of and reproduce well the experimental fact that the
Mn(C0); under the Cd”, CjV and Djh symmetries, the equatorial CO groups are slightly leaning toward the
Djh geometric configuration is the most stable one in axial hydrogen atom [ 151. Again, it is interesting to
terms of energy. The calculated total bonding energies note the differences in the corresponding bond distances
are found to be 12.63 kJ mol-’ and 4.19 kJ mol-’ between H2Fe(CO)1 and HFe(CO)i. It is found in
lower than those for the Cd, and CjV geometries, Table 1 that the Fe-C,, and Fe-C, experimental
respectively. The calculated geometry is in distances are shortened from 1.802 A and 1.832 A
good agreement with the experimental data [ 151 in H11Fe(C0)4 to 1.75 A and 1.72 A in HFe(CO);,
obtained from X-ray diffraction analysis for the respectively, while the C,,-O,, and C,,-O,, experi-
[Ni(l,lO-ghen)j][Mn(CO)s]~ crystal, with deviations mental separations are lengthened from 1.145 A in
of 0.02 A (bond distance) and 2” (bond angle). It H*Fe(CO)., to 1.15 A and 1.18 A in HFe(CO)i,
should be remembered that our calculations have respectively. These changes in the bond distances
ignored the role of the counterion [Ni( l,lO-phen)]” indicate the effect of the dissociation of H+ ions on
in the crystal field. On the other hand, the calculated the Fe-C and C-O chemical bonds.
Mn-C,, distance of 1.839 .$ is slightly longer than the
Mn-C,, distance (1.824 A), which correctly repro- 3.1.3. Co(CO),
duces the experimental measurements [ 141. Hence We have fully optimized two geometries of
the calculated geometry for Mn(C0); using DFT- Co(CO), with C3” and Td symmetries. The calculated
LDA/NL is satisfactory in our studies. CjV configuration is 0.87 kJ mall’ higher in energy
It is worth pointing out that there is one notable than the Td structure. This agrees well with the experi-
difference in the corresponding Mn-C and C-O mental Td geometry obtained by X-ray analysis of the
distances between HMn(CO)s and Mn(C0);. It is crystal structure for TICO(CO)~ [17]. It should be
shown from the experimental data in Table 1 that pointed out that there are no discrete T~CO(CO)~
after the dissociation of H+ ions in HMn(CO)S, the moieties in the solid state. Thus, the counterion Tl’
Mn-C,, and Mn-C,, separations are shorter by in the TlCo(C0)4 crystal affects significantly the bond
0.058 A and 0.034 A, respectively, while, in contrast, distances in Co(C0);. The experimental Td geometry
the C,,-O,, and C,-O,, distances are longer by for Co(CO), is in fact slightly distorted. The three-
0.013 A and 0.011 A, respectively. It is interesting fold-related carbonyl group has a Co-C-O angle of
to remark here that this trend in bond distance changes 155”, not 180”. Therefore, there are two sets of corre-
is important in understanding the stability of the sponding bond distances and bond angles. The experi-
compounds studied. mental structural data for the two sets are given in
parentheses in Table 1. The calculated Co-C distance
3.1.2. HFe(C0): of 1.789 A is found to be 0.036 A shorter than the
The experimental geometry of the HFe(CO)i anion experimental average value of 1.825 A [ 171. Also, the
has been found to be a configuration with CjV theoretical estimate of the C-O distance agrees with
symmetry [ 161. The geometry optimization in our cal- the experimental average data to within 0.056 A.
culations has been carried out within the CjV sym- However these theoretical values are within the
metry constraint. All bond distances are calculated corresponding experimental bond distances of the
% Chen ct ul./Journul oJMoleculnr Structure (Them-hem) 417 (1097) 247-254 251
two sets mentioned above. In this case, a direct com- 3.2. Mulliken population analysis
parison of the bond distances calculated by LDA/NL
between HCO(CO)~ and Co(CO), might help to 3.2.1. Atomic net churges
understand the change in chemical bonding due to For the Mn(CO);, HFe(C0); and Co(W), species
the H’ dissociation in HCo(CO)+ as well as their hydrides, the central transition metal
It is found in Table 1 that the calculated Co-C atom is in a low formal oxidation state. Hence, the
distance in Co(C0); is 0.013 i shorter than the problem of electronic charge distribution in the mole-
average calculated value of Co-C in HCo(CO)+ In cules or anions has been a subject of intense interest.
contrast, the C-O separation in Co(CO), is calculated On the basis of Mulliken population analysis, atomic
to be larger than the average calculated distance of C- net charges for the species mentioned above are given
O in HCo(CO)+ It should be noted that the trend in the in Table 2. It is found in Table 2 that the calculated
decrease of the M-C (where M is Mn, Fe, Co) dis- atomic net charges on the central metal atoms and the
tances upon an increase in the C-O separation carbon atoms of the carbonyl groups are all positive,
becomes obvious. These structural changes show but not too high, while all the oxygen atoms of the
that when H+ ions in Mn(CO);, HFe(CO)4 and carbonyl groups have negative net charges. To avoid
Co(CO)i are removed by dissociation, the interaction confusion in the charge signs. we prefer herein to
between the central metal atom and the coordinating discuss electronic charges on atoms rather than “net
carbon atom at the carbonyl groups becomes stronger charges”. It is interesting to note that the electronic
with a concomitant weakening of the bonding charges on the central metal atoms in the hydride
between the carbon and oxygen atoms in the carbonyl molecules are greater than those in the corresponding
groups. anions. The dissociation of H- ions in the hydride
Table 2
Atotmc net charges
” Average value.
252 Z. Chen et aL/Journal of Molecular Structure (Themhem) 417 ( 1997) 247-254
molecule will certainly increase the electronic charge slightly, for Mn(CO);, HFe(C0)4_ and Co(CO), the
for the anion by one; however, the electronic charge situations differ from each other. The decrease of
on the central metal atom in fact does not increase, on the C-O Mulliken population for Mn(C0); is the
the contrary, it decreases by 0.2751 e, 0.1749 e and smallest, being calculated to be 0.0382 and 0.0002
0.0316 e for the Mn, Fe and Co atoms, respectively. for C,,-O,, and C,,-O,, respectively. In the case of
On the other hand, the dissociation of H+ ions in the HFe(CO)i, the Mulliken populations of C,,-O,, and
hydride molecule leads the electronic charges on the C,,-O,, decrease by 0.0398 and 0.0562, respectively.
oxygen and carbon atoms in the carbonyl groups to For Co(CO);, the Mulliken population reductions for
increase. Table 2 shows that the electronic charge on C,,-O,, and C,,-O,, are calculated to be 0.0854 and
each carbonyl group increases by 0.2253 e, 0.2524 e 0.0936, respectively.
and 0.2426 e on average for Mn(Co);, HFe(C0)4 and The change in the interatomic Mulliken population
Co(CO),, respectively. It is obvious that the electronic might be rationalized on the basis of chemical valence
charges for this species of carbonylmetallate anion are theory. It is well known that in transition metal
further delocalized on the coordinating carbonyl carbonyl compounds there is both CO - M donation
groups after the dissociation of H+ ions in the hydride bonding and M - CO donation back bonding. The
molecule. latter is formed from d electrons on the metal atom,
back bonding to a a* molecular orbital of the carbonyl
3.2.2. Interatomic M&liken populations group. The two types of chemical bonding, CO - M
The calculated interatomic Mulliken populations and M - CO, allow the metal atom to combine with
are listed in Table 3. On comparison with the hydride carbonyl group ligands. Thus, when more valence
molecules, the Mulliken populations between the electrons transfer from the central metal atom to the
central metal atom M and the carbon atom C (both carbonyl groups, the M-CO bond will be strength-
C,, and C,,) for the Mn(CO);, HFe(CO)i and ened, resulting in weakening of the C-O bond of
Co(CO), anions increase significantly. In Table 3, the carbonyl group. Therefore, the carbonyl groups
the increment of the Mulliken populations between play an important role in stabilizing carbonylmetallate
Mn-C,, and Mn-C,, are found to be 0.1168 and anions.
0.0800, respectively, and 0.1118 and 0.1360 for Fe-
C,, and Fe-C,,, respectively. In the case of Co(CO),, 3.3. Relaxation energy
the Mulliken population on the average for Co-C,,
and Co-C,, increases by 0.1420. While it is shown Recently Folga and Ziegler [5]a have investigated
in Table 3 that the Mulliken populations for carbonyl metal-carbon and metal-hydrogen bond energies for
groups in the carbonylmetallate anions decrease certain metal carbonyl compounds by DFT-LDA!NL.
Table 3
Interatomic Mulliken populations
[13] (a) H.B. Schlegel, in: K.P. Lawley (Ed.) Ab Initio Methods in [15] B.A. Frenz, J.A. Ibers, Inorg. Chem. 11 (1972) 1109.
Quantum Chemistry, Adv. Chem. Phys. Vol. 67, Wiley New [16] M.B. Smith, R. Bau, .I. Am. Chem. Sot. 95 (1973) 3288.
York, 1987. (b) J.D. Head, M.C. Zemer, Adv. Quantum Chem. [ 171 D.P. Schussler, W.R. Robinson, W.F. Edgell, Inorg. Chem. 13
20 (1988) 1. (1974) 1.53.
(141 E.A. McNeil, F.R. Scholer, J. Am. Chem. Sot. 99 (1977) 6243.