Anda di halaman 1dari 11

CHAPTER – 6

THERMAL POWER DEVELOPMENT

6.1 Construction Monitoring of Commissioning programme of thermal


Thermal Power Projects generating units during 2005-06 is shown as
Annexure-6B.
Central Electricity Authority is New bench marks for synchronization for
closely monitoring the progress of various various thermal units achieved are as under:
construction activities of thermal projects
under execution in the Country for timely
commissioning. Regular visits are made by
Unit Old New
the officers to the sites for assessing the
Size Bench Bench
progress of various construction activities
Mark Mark
and rendering necessary advice/assistance in
resolving the problems being faced by the 500 49 37
project authorities to meet the schedule of MW Months Months
commissioning. Joint Co-ordination 250 32 28
Meetings (JCMs) are held in CEA with MW Months Months
project authorities, main plant & equipment
manufacturers and other equipment 210 32 26
suppliers to review the progress. MW Months Months
Monitoring mechanism in CEA has been
strengthened & Nodal officers have been
nominated for each project for monitoring 6.1.1 Achievement of Commercial
the progress of a project. Operation of Newly Commissioned
Units
The major constraints in timely
achievement of various milestones are After synchronisation of the units,
identified and taken up at various levels like the status of completion of pending works is
MoP/ State Govt./ Project authorities to also monitored and follow-up actions taken
resolve the issues. for early commercial operation of the units.

The year wise targets of thermal capacity Out of 8 nos. thermal units, which
addition vis-à-vis achievement during last were under stabilisation during 2004-05, the
three years of 10th Plan are given below: commercial operation of TDL Thermal
Power Station-St.V U-7 (250MW),
Ramagundam STPS St. III U-7 (500MW),
Year Target Achieve % Talcher STPP St.II U-5 (500 MW) and
(MW) ment Achieve Mejia TPS Extn. U-4 (210MW) has been
(MW) ment achieved. However, the thermal units viz.
2002 3502.1 2223.1 108 TDL Thermal Power Station-Stage-V, U-8
-03 (250MW), Talcher STPP St.II U-6
2003 1361.6 1437.34 105.5 (500MW), Rihand STPS St.II Unit-3
-04 (500MW) and Akrimota Lignite based TPP
U-1 (125MW) are still under stabilization
2004 3161.52 2933.92* 92.8
and will be declared in commercial
-05
operation in due course.
*for details see Annexure-6A
6.2 Thermal Technology Development iii) Emissions of Green House Gases
(GHG), Suspended Particulate
Central Electricity Authority Matter (SPM), Sox, NOx etc.
provides the leadership in introducing new iv) Ash disposal issues
technologies for thermal power stations. In v) Environmental impacts due to coal
the current year with the help of other mining/ transport
experts in the field of thermal power, CEA vi) Low plant availability due to higher
has come out with its recommendation for forced outages.
introduction of 800 – 1000 MW supercritical vii) Lower operational efficiency
units in the country. Under the initiative
taken by Member (Thermal), CEA, efforts 6.2.1.1 Supercritical Technology
are being made to identify the right
technologies, major technical parameters, Super-critical units which provide
sizing of auxiliary equipments etc are being better plant efficiency have been operational
taken up. CEA also plays a major role in the in the world for the last three decades in
introduction of clean coal technologies. various unit sizes ranging from 500 to 1300
MW. Most of the super critical units are
The choice of technology for a operating in USA, Russia, Japan, Germany,
power project depends on a number of Italy & South Korea. Design of these units
factors viz. Unit size, location of the project, vary from manufacturer to manufacturer in
fuel type, other inputs available, likely regard to boiler configuration (two pass or
emissions and permissible emission levels. tower type), type of water wall tubing
Each of these aspects has a bearing on the (vertical or spiral, bare or rifled) start up
installation and operation costs of the project system etc. So far in India, we do not have
and the net impact of these factors gets any operating plant with supercritical
reflected in the tariff. The maturity and parameters. Many units of 660 MW
provenness of technology, its availability at capacity are now planned with supercritical
competitive costs and reliable support technology at Sipat, Barh etc.
during entire project life is also given due
consideration. There are various However, with a view to decide on
technologies available for power generation optimal size and supercritical parameters of
in Indian Power sector and new technologies the thermal units to be inducted in the Indian
coming up with more efficiencies and power sector based on various techno-
environment friendly. economic considerations, the “Committee to
recommend the next higher unit size for
6.2.1 Clean Coal Technologies Coal Fired Thermal Power Stations” was
constituted by the Central Electricity
Green House Gas (GHG) emissions Authority with representatives from
from thermal power stations have been utilities, manufacturers, Ministry of Power
drawing greater attention in the recent past. and Planning Commission. The Committee
The efficiencies of turbine and boiler need in its report has recommended 800- 1000
to be improved to reduce the GHG MW as the next higher size of Unit with
emissions. The continued use of high ash Super Critical parameters in view of the
content coal in electricity generation advantages which are brought out in the
involves a number of issues and concerns. report.
Some major concerns are:
6.2.1.2 Circulating Fluidized Bed
i) Higher plant initial cost Combustion (CFBC)
ii) Higher auxiliary power consumption
in Coal/Ash handling systems CFBC technology used for power
plant applications entails higher cost as
compared to PC technology. However, cost plant performance. Blending of high & low
is comparable when PC technology ash coals is another option which could be
necessitates installation of FGD system. considered as an approach to meet the
environment restrictions. The
World over, maximum size of CFBC characteristics of blends of two or more
units is around 300 MW. First 250 MW unit coals may not be proportional to the ratio of
was installed in France (Gardanne) in 1995. the individual coals in the blends. Hence, in
Currently, quite a few 250 MW units are dealing with operational and environmental
operating using different fuels viz. coal, issues relating to blends, it is necessary to
lignite, petcoke etc. carry out extensive and detailed
investigation on grinding characteristics,
CFBC technology has selectively combustion characteristics and
been applied in India for firing lignite. environmental impact potential for the
Following power stations in India have individual as well as different blends. CEA
adopted CFBC technology: has carried out a techno-economic study reg.
use of Washed Coal Vs. ROM Coal and the
* Surat lignite (2x125 MW) - under report is under finalisation.
operation
* Akrimota (2x125 MW) - under 6.2.1.4 Integrated Gasification Combined
installation Cycle
* Neyveli (2x250 MW) - under installation
Integrated Gasification Combined
6.2.1.3 Coal Beneficiation Cycle (IGCC) System is one of the clean
coal technologies in which coal is converted
Indian coal as available to power into gaseous fuel which after cleaning is
generation is by and large poor quality with used in CCGT plants. The IGCC systems,
high ash content. This coal quality gets which are commercially available have
further deteriorated through shown higher efficiencies and exceptionally
overburden/extraneous matters during good environmental performance in Sox
mining, primarily due to lack of adequate removal, Nox reduction and particulate
safeguards and quality control. Power plant removal. IGCC, if commercially proven,
operators are continuously demanding for will be one of the most attractive power
more consistent quality coal. The possible generation technologies for the 21st century.
options are to go for washed coal or to adopt Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle
coal blending to improve the coal quality. technology is also being considered in view
Coal beneficiation as a possible route for of the development of advanced gas turbines
coal quality improvement has great with very high efficiencies. The Project
potential. In view of the fact that a large Advisory Group set up by MOP with
number of power plants are located much Chairman CEA as its Chairman, submitted
farther from the coal mine, any cost incurred its Report during Jan, 1999 for setting up a
in reducing ash content by 8 to 10% through 100 MW IGCC demonstration Project either
coal beneficiation gets compensated through at NTPC Dadri or at Kaperkheda TPS of
reduced transportation cost for stations MSEB. NTPC Dadri was ranked No. 1 in
located at a distance of 600-700 km or more. order of Preference. An Inter-Ministerial
In addition, there are benefits of using Steering Group under the Chairmanship of
beneficiated coal such as lower initial capital Secretary (Power) was constituted with the
cost, improved plant performance, reduced approval of Union Minister of State for
O&M etc. Even in the case of pithead Power (Independent charge) for monitoring
stations, any effort to improve the coal the IGCC Demonstration Project. The
quality by merely removing the extraneous Group which included CEA also was
matter would go a long way in improving intended to establish clearly whether the
coal intake comes down through the IGCC policy provides for fiscal terms and
process and to assess the suitability of contractual arrangements to explore and
gasifying the Indian coal as well as exploit CBM. Raniganj, Jharia, Bokaro and
establishing the economics of the project North Karanpura are the basins estimated to
and for initiating measures for setting up a have the best CBM potential in India. It is
demonstration project. The group decided estimated that the gas reserves in Jharia and
that a 100 MW IGCC demonstration plant Raniganj fields will be about 200 Billion
will be set up at NTPC, Auraiya jointly by cubic metres. If CBM can be exploited
BHEL and NTPC. economically, it will be valuable fuel for
power generation and other applications.
6.2.1.5 Integrated Solar – Thermal and However, this fuel is still at the exploratory
Combined Cycle – Nuclear stage. Adequate proven resource and
Technology techno economics will have to be
established before considering it as a viable
Our country is gifted with vast option.
potential to generate electric power from
solar energy. Direct solar insolation for over 6.2.2 Other Clean Technologies
10 months in a year are available in the Thar
desert stretching over vast areas of 6.2.2.1 Combined Cycle Technology :
Rajasthan and Gujarat. Even if 1% of it is
used, it can generate about 6000 MW of With increased availability of natural
electric power. The high initial cost of Solar gas/ LNG, it is but natural to install
power plant prevents its commercialization. combined cycle plants because of various
However, Solar with Coal fired and inherent advantages such as short gestation
combined cycle with Nuclear energy options period, less space requirement, environment
are being studied in CEA to have better friendly native and easy to operate &
techno-economics of power generation. control. There has been a steady progress in
combustion turbine technology with
6.2.1.6 Coal Bed Methane ( CBM ) : availability of large capacity advanced class
higher efficiency gas turbines in the range
A number of coal fields in the upto 330 MW ratings and single shaft
country are associated with the presence of machines. The performance of gas turbine
methane. Coal bed methane can be tapped technology has improved dramatically over
by drilling bore holes as in the case of the past twenty years. The thermal
natural gas. This CBM reserve has been efficiency of gas turbine power systems has
estimated to be 486.55 billion cubic metres. more than doubled at the same time
The amount of methane stored in coal is reliability has improved and emission levels
related to the rank and the depth of the Coal. have decreased significantly. The
Higher the Coal ranks and the deeper the thermodynamic improvements that have
coal is presently buried, the greater its allowed for such a dramatic increase in gas
capacity to hold gas. Oil and Natural Gas turbine efficiency have been identified as
Corporation has already drilled Research & rise in Gas Turbines inlet temperature,
Development wells in Raniganj Coal Fields. pressure, multi-pressure steam supply, and
A GEF funded project for exploration of optimization of losses.
CBM, with UNDP as the implementing
agency is also in progress. The project 6.2.2.2 Fuel Cell Technology :
could also reduce the methane emission in
the atmosphere and help to use it gainfully Fuel cells are electro-chemical
for power generation. A CBM Policy in for devices that convert energy from fuel
its exploration and exploitation in the directly into electricity through electro-
country is understood to be existing. The chemical reactions. These cells normally
use hydrogen directly as fuel or as derived Turbine generator for 500 MW unit’
from natural gas or other hydro carbons. were finalised.
About 4-5 major technologies for fuel cells d) Technical Standard for ‘Quality
are in various stages of development Assurance at Manufacturers’ works for
worldwide. A fuel cell development Thermal Power Generating Stations was
programme is under way in India under the under preparation.
ageis of Ministry of Non-conventional
Energy Sources and several organizations e) Study for assessment of consumptive
like BHEL, SPIC, Indian Institute of water requirement for TPS in the country
Science, Bangalore, Central Glass and running on open & closed cycle mode of
Ceramic Research Institute, Calcutta have condenser cooling is in progress.
undertook research projects for f) A report on the economics of use of
development of various technologies of fuel washed coal in large sized pit head
cells indigenously. M/s BHEL are in the station was prepared after visiting Power
process of developing 25 kW fuel cell stack Stations and Coal Washeries across the
with Phosphoric Acid Fuel Cell (PAFC) country.
technology. A study to observe
performance of imported 200 kW fuel cells g) Safety standards for thermal Power
stack under Indian conditions is also in Generating Stations were prepared as per
progress at BHEL. M/s SPIC are in the requirements of section 73(c) of
process of developing 5 KW solid polymer Electricity Act 2003.
fuel cells stacks. M/s Electrochemical h) R&D proposals of four prioritized theme
Institute, are engaged in Molten Carbonate areas in Thermal & Nuclear power
Fuel Cell (MCFC) technology. Project for generation have been finalized and got
development of direct methanol fuel cell is the same approved by the Standing
in progress at IISc., Bangalore under a Committee on R&D.
UNDP research programme. Fuel cell
applications include distributed generation i) Under the Thermal Technology
in hospitals, airports, research institutes etc. Improvement programme scheme
Apart from power generation, variants of approved by MoP, Softwares for thermal
fuel cell also find applications for transport power station design, piping design &
in electric driven vehicles. stress analysis, civil structure design &
analysis, cost & performance analysis
6.3 Important Works Carried out: were procured and concerned engineers
were provided training on these
a) Technical Standard on Operation Norms softwares.
for Coal/Lignite based power stations j) Review of new technology options:
and Combined Cycle Gas Turbine
(i) Burning Intensification Technology.
Stations was finalized and sent to CERC.
(ii) Computer Flow Dynamics in the boiler
Operation Norms for DG Power Stations
to minimize system pressure drop
are under finalisation.
(iii) Water consumption optimization in
b) Based on the recommendations of the ash handling system & dry cooling
committee, next higher size of coal fired system.
thermal units adopted is 800-1000 MW (iv) Integration of nuclear cycle with Gas
supercritical unit. A task force has been turbine Combined Cycle for
constituted for its induction along with maximising overall efficiency.
suitable provisions of technology
transfer.
c) Standard specifications for ‘Steam
generator and auxiliaries and ‘Steam
6.4 Other Technology related (iv) Norms on Heat rate & O&M
Activities: expenses for Indraprastha Power
Generation Company Limited.
a) Feasibility Report of R&M of Coal (v) Review of co-generation project at
Handling Plant and Control & Ajaibpur sugar complex as desired
Instrumentation system of Main plant of by MOE&F.
Chandrapur TPS scrutinized and (vi) Operational limitations for
recommendations sent to DVC. minimum load with use of tube
mills as referred to by APGENCO.
b) The Techno-Commercial offers received
(vii) Determination of installed capacity
for the ash handling plant of Giral
for a combined cycle Gas based
Lignite Power Project (1x125 MW)
plant as referred by APTRANSCO.
scrutinized and comments sent to
(viii) Extension of foreign collaboration
RRVUN.
for Waste Heat Recovery Steam
c) Report on Free Governor Mode of
Generators by Indian manufacturer.
Operation in Thermal units was finalised
(ix) Issue related to minimum draw
& submitted to Central Electricity
down level at Rihand reservoir.
Regulatory Commission (CERC) in
(x) Issues related with modifications in
fulfillment of the advice sought by them.
Indian Boiler Regulations.
This report was prepared in consultation
with major utilities and equipment
6.7 Renovation & Modernisation of
manufacturers after field trials of the
Thermal Power Stations
modified scheme.
In order to improve the performance
6.5 Investigation of failures
of existing Thermal Power Stations, a
i) G T- 6 failure at Raichur TPS Renovation and Modernisation (R&M)
ii) G T-1 failure at Tau Devi Lal Programme called Phase-I R&M
Thermal Power Station, Panipat Programme was launched by the
iii) Turbine Bearings Failure at Unit II Government of India all over the country in
(120 MW) of Tau Devi Lal Thermal September 19 84 for completion during the
Power Station Seventh Plan Period. This programme was
successfully completed and intended
6.6 Technical advice benefits were achieved.
Technical advice was sought by 6.7.1 R&M (Phase-II) Programme
regulators/ State governments/ utilities/
other govt. departments on various issues In view of the encouraging results
under Section 73 (m) of Electricity Act achieved from the Phase-I programme, the
2003. Some of the major advices given are: Phase-II programme for R&M of 44 nos. of
(i) Provision of Bus sectionalizer thermal power stations was taken up in the
breakers in 220 KV common bus year 1990-91. Power Finance Corporation
bar at 515 MW Combined cycle (PFC) was assigned to provide loan
power plants at Hazira assistance to the State Electricity Boards for
(ii) Bid evaluation report for Tenughat R&M works. All the schemes were
TPS extension. identified by the Roving teams comprising
(iii) Formulation of methodology for of engineers from CEA, BHEL and
restructuring ownership of a concerned utilities. An expenditure of
centrally owned thermal power Rs.862 crores was incurred and an
station. additional generation of 5000 MU/ year has
been achieved. Also, the Life Extension
works on 4 units (300 MW) of Neyveli efficiency. In order to improve the over-all
Thermal Power Station were completed. performance of the under performing
thermal power stations, CEA have
6.7.2 9th Plan Programme constituted Plant Performance Improvement
Groups called Roving Teams comprising
The CEA reviewed the progress of engineers from CEA, BHEL, NTPC, SEBs
Phase-II R&M Programme and the balance etc. These teams visit the power plants and
activities still required to be carried out were suggest the measures for improvement of
included in the 9th Plan Programme along their performance. The Team draws an
with the subsequently identified additional action plan and regularly monitors the
activities. During the 9th Plan Programme, performance and also take up follow up
127 Units (17306 MW) at 29 Power Stations visits to the plant till their performance
at an estimated cost of Rs.913 crores were improves to the desired level. During the
taken up for R&M. The works have almost year 2004-05, the Roving teams have visited
completed. In addition, another 25 units Amarkantak (1x30+1x20+2x120 MW),
(1685 MW) for Life Extension at an Kutch Lignite (2x70+1x75 MW) and
estimated cost of Rs.1700 crores. Life Parichha (2x110 MW) thermal power plants.
Extension works on all the 25 units planned
for 9th five year plan have been completed. 6.8 O&M Safety Standards (OSS) for
Thermal Power Plants
6.7.3 10 th Plan Programme
As per section 73 (c) and 53 (a) of
During the 10th plan, 106 old thermal Electricity Act, 2003, CEA is required to
units with a total capacity of about 10413 formulate Safety Standards for construction
MW at an estimated cost of Rs.9200 crores and O&M of electrical plants and lines. An
have been identified for Life Extension Advisory Committee for formulating Safety
Works. Out of 106 units, Life Extension Standards for thermal generation sector was
works of 7 units have been completed and constituted under the Chairmanship of
further action is being taken by concerned Member (Thermal), CEA. The Safety
SEBs/utilities to carryout the works on Standards have since been finalized and
remaining units. After implementation of report submitted by the Committee.
life extension (LE) schemes, the economical
operating life of the units will get extended 6.8.1 Quality Assurance Standards
by another 15-20 years besides the overall (QAS) during O&M of Thermal
improvement in the performance of the Power Plants
units. Also R&M works on 57 units (14270
MW) at an estimated cost of Rs.977 crores An Advisory Committee for
have been identified for improvement of formulating Quality Assurance Standards
their performance. (QAS) for Thermal Generation Sector was
constituted under the chairmanship of
6.7.4 Programme for the year 2004-05 Member (Thermal), CEA. Various meetings
were convened and drafts Quality Assurance
During the year 2004-05, the work of Standards (QAS) during O&M of thermal
Life Extension of Korba East (unit 5) and power plants were prepared.
Kothagudem (unit-7) were completed.
6.9 Environment Management
6.7.5 Roving Teams
Chief Engineer (C&E) represents
A number of thermal power stations CEA on the “Expert Committee”
are operating at sub-optimal level of reconstituted by MoE&F for Environment
performance with low availability and Impact Assessment of Thermal Power
Projects. CEA collects and analyses the generated from the lignite/coal based TPS is
environmental related data from power ash in the form of fly ash (80-90%) and
stations for environmental up-gradation in bottom ash (10-20%). (considering 38% ash
respect of power projects. CEA also content as an average and at 80% PLF)
provides input data to MoEF during the would be of the order of 181.26 million
appraisal of schemes by the committee for tones per annum. Since the economics prefer
the clearance of projects from environmental installation of coal/lignite based TPS near
angle. During the period April 2004 – the source of coal/lignite i.e. pit head, ash
March 2005, the Expert Committee generated is to be utilized in various ways
considered 26 projects with an installed by locating industries in the vicinity
capacity of 24008 MW out of which 21 depending upon characteristics and other
projects with the installed capacity of 13138 engineering properties of the ash.
MW were recommended for clearance from
environmental angle. Presently, the ash based products are
at developmental stage and need to be made
6.9.1 Green House Gases Mitigation more environmental friendly by bringing ash
revolution. Some of the areas of application
The Asian Institute of Technology include:
(AIT), Bangkok, Thailand had taken up a
research project titled “Mitigating (i) Brick/Block/Tiles manufacturing
Environmental Emissions from Power (ii) Cement manufacturing
Sector: analysis of technical and policy (iii) Roads and embankment construction
options in selected Asian countries” funded (iv) Structural fill for reclaiming low
by Swedish International Development lying areas
Agency (SIDA). CEA & IIT, Kanpur were (v) Mines fill
selected by AIT National Research Institute (vi) Agriculture, Forestry and Wasteland
for phase-III of the programme after the development
successful completion of ARRPEEC phase- (vii) Part replacement of cement in mortar
II. Under phase-III, the objective of the and concrete
programme was "Mitigating environmental (viii) Hydraulic structure (Roller
emissions from the power sector in selected compacted concrete)
Asian countries - strategies for promotion of (ix) Ash Dyke Raising
Energy Efficient Technologies". Studies (x) Building components – Mortar,
under this programme have been completed Concrete, Concrete Hollow Blocks,
in Nov. 2004 and reports have been Aerated Concrete Blocks etc.
submitted to AIT, Bangkok. (xi) Other medium & high value added
products (Ceramic tiles, wood,
6.10 Fly Ash Utilisation paints,.) payment blocks, Light
weight aggregate, extraction of
At Present, the installed capacity of alumina, cenospheres etc.
coal/lignite based TPS in the country is
about 67,791 MW as on 31.5.05 and the As mentioned above, by the end of
figure is likely to increase with coming up of 2012, the ash likely to be generated from
thermal capacity of 11115 MW by 1,01,311 MW coal/lignite thermal capacity
remaining period of Xth Plan and 30,000. shall be of the order of 168.622 million
MW during XIth Plan aggregating to total tones per annum. Until or unless ways and
coal/lignite capacity as 108906. MW at the means are developed for utilization of
end of XIth Plan. It is estimated that from a enormous amount of ash are not adopted, the
total thermal capacity (coal/lignite) based situation would become unmanageable/out
TPS of 108906 MW by end of XIth Plan, the of control. One of the measures that the
ash generated in the form of by products Govt. has initiated is regulation enacted by
MoE&F for 100% ash utilization. This is Tariff Policy, the recovery of expenses
being enforced by the Court of Law. Owing incurred towards utilization / disposal of ash
to the difficulties faced by the generating produced at fossil-fuel based power
companies in disposing off ash generated generating stations.
continuously. Govt. of India is considering
creation of Fly Ash Missions at various 6.10.1 Monitoring of Fly Ash Generation
levels which are likely to promote & help in & Utilization
developing infrastructure facilities for
utilizing ash in a big way so as to achieve Central Electricity Authority
the target of 100% utilization by 2009. A continued to monitor the fly ash generation
number of measures are being taken to and ash utilization of coal/lignite based
encourage various sectors to consume ash. thermal power plants pertaining to power
The expenditure incurred by ash producer in utilities of the Centre and the states.
relation to measure required to be taken for
ash utilization are required to be passed The progressive ash utilization data
through the tariff until the time when ash up to the year 2003-04 has been compiled in
starts getting paid for itself. In this context, the Graph shown as under :-
CEA has suggested to MoP to include in the
PROGRESSIVE ASH GENERATION & UTILIZATION OF COAL/ LIGNITE BASED T.P.S.

120

100
CAPACITY(MWX1000)
ASH GEN. [MTPA]

80
ASH UTI.[MTPA]

NOS.OF TPS.
%AGE UTI.

60

40

20

0 1992- 1993- 1994- 1995- 1996- 1997- 1998- 1999- 2000- 2001- 2002- 2003-
93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04
No.of TPStns. covered 33 33 32 35 68 76 75 76 77 74 76 83
Instd.cap. covered MWx1000 29.543 29.543 22.136 30.868 46.52 53.337 53.395 56.462 54.999 54.641 57.297 62.037
Flyash production MTPA 34.955 36.411 28.992 41.43 68.882 78.055 78.987 74.028 86.294 82.805 91.651 96.28
Flyash Utilization MTPA 0.81 1.29 2.366 2.739 6.635 8.433 9.604 10.88 13.505 15.606 20.787 28.17
%age Utilization % 2.317 3.513 8.161 6.611 9.634 10.804 12.159 14.696 15.650 18.850 22.680 29.26
Fly Ash gen. per 1000mw (MTPA) 1.183 1.232 1.310 1.342 1.481 1.463 1.479 1.311 1.569 1.515 1.600 1.552
flyash utilization per 1000mw (MTPA) 0.027 0.043 0.1068 0.088 0.1426 0.158 0.179 0.1926 0.245 0.285 0.363 0.454

YEARS

6.10.2 Dry Ash Collection Scheme generated by it. The steps mentioned include
making available ash for various uses and
Scheme of dry ash collection to be taken utilisation of fly ash in accordance with an
up by the Generating Companies is elucidated action plan so as to achieve 100% utilisation
as under: within a time period of nine or 15 years as the
case may be. These steps were meant to
Ministry of Environment & Forests vide protect the environment, conserve top soil and
notification dated 14th September 1999 and prevent the dumping and disposal of fly ash
subsequent Amendments dated 27-8-2003 to discharged from coal or lignite based thermal
this notification have made it mandatory that power plants on land. As a result of follow up
every coal or lignite based thermal power plant & persuasion actions from Central Government
shall take steps to ensure the utilisation of ash Agencies and of their own, a number of state/
union territory governments have initiated steps The Standing Committee
to facilitate & enhance use of bottom ash as well constituted by CEA is in the process of
as fly ash generated in thermal power stations. identifying new sites in consultation with the
State Utilities. CEA has awarded studies to
The first step towards the above is to CMPDI and NRSA for identification of large
extract and collect the ash in dry form for its pithead and coastal sites respectively by using
disposal to achieve 100% ash utilisation. In the satellite mapping through remote sensing.
above context it was felt necessary to evolve a CMPDI has submitted the report for the
standard scheme for dry ash collection and 36,000 MW pit head power plant sites
disposal system. CEA is presently developing a identified near the coal blocks in the eight
scheme for 100% Ash utilization for a typical major coalfields. They have also identified
1000 MW Thermal Power Station having 2 additional coal blocks for 24,000 MW
units of 500 MW each. capacity for which they will be identifying the
power plant sites. NRSA has submitted the
reports for coastal sites in Gujarat &
6.11 Selection of sites for thermal
Maharashtra. They are carrying out study for
projects
the other coastal states.

To accelerate the hydro power Based on the reports of the teams


development, 50,000 MW hydro electric of the Committee which visited identified sites
initiative was launched by Hon’ble Prime in different states, the Reports of
Minister of India on May 24, 2003. Keeping in CMPDI/NRSA and details of various other
view the huge power generation capacity sites compiled by the Committee, a large shelf
requirement, Ministry of Power/CEA has of potential sites has been created. Many sites
proposed 100,000 MW environment friendly from this shelf have been identified for
Thermal initiative with an aim to have a shelf of benefits during the 11th Plan. The reports of
well prepared detailed project reports (DPRs). CMPDI & NRSA have been forwarded to
concerned State Govts/ NTPC for
In the context of the need to set up development of the identified sites.
additional thermal power stations to meet the
power requirements of the country up to the Under the 100,000 MW
year 2012 AD and beyond, CEA has in Sept., environmental friendly thermal initiative, it
2001 constituted a committee under the is proposed to utilize the services of public
Chairmanship of Member (Thermal) and sector generating companies and
consisting of members from different consultancy organizations for carrying out
Ministries/Deptts./SEBs etc. for selection of preliminary site investigations, preparation
sites for large coastal/Pit head and other of Pre-Feasibility Reports (PFR), tie-up of
Thermal Power Stations. As the process of inputs and obtaining statutory/non-statutory
selection of sites is of continuous nature, the clearances in the name of project and
above mentioned Committee has been converted preparation of DPRs in a time bound
into a Standing Committee. Teams consisting of programme.
the members of the Committee from CEA,
Planning Commission, MOE&F, CMPDI, Higher size coal based units of 800-
Railways etc. are being constituted for visiting 1000 MW of environment friendly super
from time to time the sites tentatively identified critical technology with standardized
by the State agencies. These teams are also designs are proposed to be introduced to
interacting with various States/Central achieve the huge capacity addition
departments for assessing the availability of programme. In order to reduce the cost,
various inputs required for setting up of bulk ordering for 10-12 sets of large size
Thermal Power Plants like land, water, fuel etc. units is being envisaged. A task force will
be set up with members drawn from
generating companies interested in bulk
purchase for preparation of tender
specifications with the help of international
consultants.

It is proposed that coal blocks shall


be handed over to developer for mining coal
with emphasis on use of washed coal. 100%
ash utilization is being envisaged since start
up of plant. Ash will be pulverized &
supplied to actual user inis envisaged to tie-
up with cement and other ash based
industries for location of their plants near
the sites of the power plants. Special
emphasis shall be given on plantation of
trees to keep entire area green.

During the year 2004-05 the


committee identified the following sites :

Maharastra Bhusawal 500 MW


Uran CCPP 400 MW
DVC Areas Kodarma 2000 MW
Ramgarh 2000 MW
M. Pradesh Singrauli 2000 MW
Bansagar 2000 MW
Jabalpur 2000 MW

******

Anda mungkin juga menyukai