• On the other hand, recall (subsection 4.1) that the slope of the budget
line measures the rate at which the market is willing to exchange good
1 for good 2. That is, the opportunity cost of consuming good 1.
• Therefore, at any market rate of exchange (as given by the slope of the
budget line) other than the M RS, the consumer would want to trade
26
one good for the other. But, if the market rate of exchange equals the
MRS the consumer wants to stay put.
Figure 1
• Hence, we can see that convexity is very natural: the more we have of
one good, the more we are willing to give some of it up in exchange for
the other good.
• The utility function, u(x1 , x2 ), can be used to measure the M RS, which
is the rate in which the consumer is willing to substitute small amount
of good 2 for good 1. Using calculus, the derivation of the M RS is
done by using differentials. That is, consider a change (dx1 , dx2 ) that
keeps the level of utility constant:
∂u (x1 , x2 ) ∂u (x1 , x2 )
du = dx1 + dx2 = 0
∂x1 ∂x2
• The first term measures the change in utility from the small change
dx1 and the second term measures the change in utility from the small
change dx2 . That is,
du = M u1 dx1 + M u2 dx2 = 0
27
Rearranging,
dx1 M u1
=−
dx2 M u2
That is,
∂u(x1 ,x2 )
dx1 ∂x1
M RS ≡ = − ∂u(x1 ,x2 )
dx2
∂x2
6.3 Cobb-Douglas
• The most commonly used utility function in economics is the Cobb-
Douglas (Paul Douglas was an economist at the University of Chicago
and later became a U.S. senator. See www.igpa.uillinois.edu/ethics/htm/about_phdouglas.ht
utility function:
u (x1 , x2 ) = xα1 xβ2
where α, β > 0 and describe the preferences of the consumer
M RS = − Mu
Mu2
1
and
28
v(x1 , x2 ) = ln u (x1 , x2 ) = ln(xα1 xβ2 ) = α ln x1 + β ln x2
• The indifference curves for this utility function looks just like the ones
for the original Cobb-Douglas utility function (you should verify it).
• It follows that at (x∗1 , x∗2 ) the indifference curve is tangent to the budget
line. Note that, clearly, the above holds for an interior optimum and not
for a boundary optimum. Can you see why a Cobb-Douglas preferences
induce an interior solution?
Figure 2
• Let’s find the demand functions for x1 and x2 for the Cobb-Douglas
utility function. The problem that we want to solve is
choose x1 , x2
to max u (x1 , x2 ) = xα1 xβ2
subject to p1 x1 + p2 x2 = m
or,
29
choose x1 , x2
to max v (x1 , x2 ) = α ln x1 + β ln x2
subject to p1 x1 + p2 x2 = m
• There are several ways to solve this problem. The first way is to sub-
stitute the budget constraint in to the objective function,
m p1
max α ln x1 + β ln( − )x1
p2 p2
The f oc for this problem is
∂ α p2 p1
= −β =0
∂x1 x1 m − p1 x1 p2
β m
x2 =
α + β p2
Figure 3
• The second,
αx2 p1
M RS = − =−
βx1 p2
and,
p1 x1 + p2 x2 = m
which are two equations with two unknowns that can be solved for the
optimal bundle. Thus, substituting:
βp1 x1
p1 x1 + p2 =m
αp2
30
βp1
p1 x1 + x1 = m
α
αp1 x1 + βp1 x1 = αm
α m
x1 =
α + β p1
• This is the demand function for good 1. Similarly, the demand function
for good 2:
β m
x2 =
α + β p2
L = α ln x1 + β ln x2 − λ(p1 x1 + p2 x2 − m)
31
• Normal good - a good for which the quantity demanded always changes
in the same way as income changes. Put precisely,
∂x(p, m)
>0
∂m
• Inferior good - Clearly,
∂x(p, m)
<0
∂m
Note that nearly any kind low-quality is an inferior good.
Figure 4
• Now we can construct the income offer curve and the Engel curve.
The income offer curve (or income expansion path) depicts the optimal
choice at different level of income holding prices constant. The Engel
curve is just plotting the optimal choice of a single good against income.
That is,
Figure 5
Figure 6
• Now, let us consider price changes while income is fixed and construct
the price offer curve Consider a decrease in p1 while p2 and m are fixed.
Figure 7
Figure 8
32
Figure 9
• Note that when the consumer is willing to substitute the goods on a one-
to-one basis all that mattered to her is the total number of units from
both goods. Clearly, a utility function that represents this preferences
must be constant along the indifference curves and must assign a higher
value to more preferred bundles.
• The simplest utility function that represents one-to-one perfect substi-
tutes preferences is clearly
u (x1 , x2 ) = x1 + x2
However, any other monotonic transformation of u (x1 , x2 ) such as
v (x1 , x2 ) = v(u (x1 , x2 ))2 = (x1 + x2 )2
also represents the same preferences. Note that both yield indifference
curves with a slope of −1.
• Note that when p2 > p1 (p2 < p1 ) then the slope of the budget line
is flatter (steeper) than of the indifference curve. Thus, the demand
function for good 1 is
m/p1 if p2 > p1
x1 = [0, m/p1 ] if p2 = p1
0 if p2 < p1
Figure 10
• When the consumer is willing to substitute good 1 for good 2 at a
constant rate different from one-to-one, say, for example, that she would
ask for two units of good 2 to compensate her for giving up one unit of
good 1, a utility function that represents the preferences is
u (x1 , x2 ) = 2x1 + x2
which yields indifference curves with a slope of −2.
• In general, the form of a utility function representing perfect substitutes
preferences is
u (x1 , x2 ) = αx1 + βx2
where α, β > 0 and measure the value of goods 1 and 2 to the con-
sumer respectively. Note that the slope of a typical indifference curve
is constant and given by −α/β.
33
6.5 Perfect complements
• Perfect complements are goods that are always consumed together in
fixed proportions (the left shoe - right shoe case). So, in some sense the
goods just complement each other. The case of perfect complements is
illustrated in the next figure.
Figure 11
• In the case of left shoe - right shoe all that mattered to the consumer
is the total number of pairs of shoes. Thus, her utility function takes
the form
u (x1 , x2 ) = min{x1 , x2 }
or any monotonic transformation.
where α, β > 0 and α/β is the ratio in which the goods are optimally
consumed
6.6 References
• H. Varian, Intermediate Microeconmics - A Modern Approach, fifth
edition, Norton. (3.6-3.8, 4.1-4.5).
34