Practice Films
T h e first films made by the Navajos were made after two days of
instruction in the technical use of the camera, exposure meter,
and splicer. T h e Navajos were told: “Here is a hundred feet of
film. Shoot anything you want with it.” They were then asked
what they were going to do, or subsequently what they had done.
All the students decided to make little movies out of what was to
us a practice assignment in the use of technology. T h e concept
of “mere” practice seemed alien to the Navajo (either because of
inherent dislike of waste, or because of inability to imagine use-
less practicing). At this point, it must be remembered there had
been no instruction in editing o r concepts of filmmaking.
264 ) Appendix
MIKEANDERSON:
The Pinlon Tree. z minutes.
This was the first subject that Mike thought of. He said, “I
make a movie of a piiion tree. It grows from small to big.” The
film is a series of twelve edemes (shots) in which Mike started
with a small bush (but shown full in the frame), going to bigger
and bigger bushes, and finally trees. After this series of edemes
(which Mike photographed in such a way that all the trees were
the approximately same size in the frame) he continued with a
dying piiion tree, then a fallen and dead piiion tree, then some
old rotting branches of a tree, and finally a single piiion acorn.
Mike’s only sequencing during editing was to transfer part of
the acorn shot to the beginning of the film, keeping the other part
for the ending.
JOHNNY
NELSON:The Navajo Horse. 3% minutes. (Photos 6-11.)
This was Johnny’s second film. Here he wanted to make a
movie about “how important a horse is to the Navajo and how
Appendix 265
he knows all about him.” The film started with ten or fifteen
extreme close-ups of hoofs, nostrils, eyes, saddle, bridle, etc.
Some of the shots were moving and some were still. At one point
Johnny asked Worth, “If I take lots of shots of parts of a horse,
and then take shots of many horses, and put the shots of parts of
one horse in between all the horses, will people think the parts
of one are parts of all?” H e then tried to photograph another
hundred feet of film showing many horses at the Squaw Dance
(a ceremony held the next day). This was successful, and he made
a film which started with several shots of complete and different
horses, then cut back and forth from extreme close-ups of the one
horse to shots of the horses as a group getting ready for a dash
across the fields (part of the ceremony). In editing the film, he
arranged his shots in an order different from that in which he
took them in the camera, and cut shots into shorter pieces, using
them in several different places in the film. The end of the film
shows the dash of the horses across the field marking the start of
the ceremony.
TSOSIE
SISTERS: John Adair Hangs Out the Laundry. 2 minutes.
TSOSIE:
MAXINE The Boys on the Seesaw. 1% minutes. (Photos 2-3).
Here Maxine photographed two boys on a seesaw. She took a
series of shots from the same cademe showing the boys and the
seesaw going up and down. When the film came back from the
lab she decided to cut it up and “splice it for fun.” She achieved
266 ) Appendix
the remarkable feat of cutting the action of a seesaw into parts,
re-arranging them in a different order without changing the flow
of action.
The Ants.
MIKEANDERSON: 2% minutes.
Mike wanted to photograph red ants in an ant hole. He
crouched over the tiny hole and heap of sand and waited for ants
to emerge. Since he shot with a wide angle lens, the ants were
almost invisible and Mike did nothing further with this footage.
Appendix 267
There were several other films made during the first practice
day. All the students showed more or less the same skill in the
use of the camera. All of them exposed their film accurately,
loaded the cameras accurately, and were in general able to
achieve just what they said they wanted to achieve.
BENALLY:
SUSIE A Navajo Weaver. 2 0 minutes. (Photos 26-30).
Susie chose to depict her mother as she wove a rug. The film
starts with a series of short shots showing a Navajo woman weav-
ing at her loom. It then turns to the job of raising the sheep,
shearing the wool, digging yucca roots for soap with which to
wash the wool, carding and spinning, walking, digging and
searching for roots with which to make dye, dying the wool, and
putting the warp on the loom. Interspersed with these activities
are large sections showing the mother walking and searching for
the various materials necessary to make and to complete all these
stages in the process of weaving. When towards the end of the
film, after I5 minutes have gone by, the mother actually begins to
weave the rug, we see interspersed shots of Susie’s little brother
mounting his horse and taking care of the sheep, the sheep graz-
ing, and various other activities around the hogan. The film only
shows about three inches of a six-foot rug being actually woven,
and only about 4% minutes of actual weaving. It jumps from the
last shot which shows the mother handling the wool on the loom
to the final shots which have the mother standing inside the
hogan holding up a series of finished rugs. These are always
shown in close-ups and long shots with the rugs held both hori-
zontally and vertically. T h e same sequence is repeated with a
268) Appendix
different set of rugs with the mother standing outside the hogan.
Of particular note in this film is the fact that there is only one
close-up of a face-the “I am thinking about the design” shot
which we mention in our analysis.