c

c
cc
c

c
c

c
c   c
c   c   c  c
c c 

c c  c c

c
c 
ccccc
c 
cc
c
 cc c
cc
c

 c

c
c
 cc
 c
cc
c

cc
c
c  ccc c  c
cc c
c
c
c c c
c
c
c

cc
c
c
c c
c cc c

c c

c
c 
c c cc cc

c
c
c  
c
 c
c  c
c c c  c 

c
c 
c  c
c   c


 c
c

cc
 c
c ccc
c

c c
c
  c c
cc
c
cc

c

c

c

c
c
c
cc
c
c cc

c c c  
c
c c
cc
ccc

c  c c   c
c  c 
c 
c c

c  c 
 c
c   c
c    c
c c c
c  c
c    c 
c c c 

c

c
c 
!c  c

cc
c  ccc
c

c

c
c  cc
 cc


cc
c

c c ccc

"cc#
  ccc c
c c
c

c cc

c c#
   c

cc c c

c
 c

c 
 c
 c
c
c ccc c
c
c
c

c c
cc

cc

c
c


cc 
c

cc
c c
c c  c cc

cc
c


c
 c c
 c
c  c  c
c 
cc"c
cc
c
c  c
c
cc
  cc
c
c
c c
 c c c$  
%cc
 c c
 c   ccc cc
cc

cc
c&

 c
c
c  c'
!c
c  c
c

c
c c
c cc

 c
c
c
c
c c
c
c
c( c
c

&
cc
cc
c 
c
c 
cc
c c
c c
c
c
  cc
c


c c
cc
c
c
 c cc c
c
c

c 
c
cc c
 c
c


c
c
cc  c c  c
c
c  c) c
c'
c
c 
c*c
c+
cc
c(
c
+  ccc 
 c c
c  c
c c

cc
 c
cc c
c
c
 cc
c
cc#
  c 
 cc

 c 
 ccc$   %c c
cc c


c
c
c
cc
  c
c
c  c
c
cc


ccc
Y
 

 
I would like to take you on an amazing journey, one that shows that there is a design to
creation and should show there is more to the story than meets the eye. So many times I have
wondered if there was a way to see God͛s footprint, or personal signature in creation ʹ and in
truth there are many ways to see it for those who seek God as a Christian ʹ but what about the
non-Christians? Science dictates many different things along the lines of creation ʹ but there
are more things that science cannot prove, then there are of things which science can prove. I
have always loved the sciences, even as a young boy I was always asking questions about things
I probably should not have been concerning myself with at that age ʹ but was still fascinated by
understanding how things worked. Since I have grown older, I have focused more on things
which science cannot explain ± as these are the things which I want answers for. What I am
about to show you, is a pattern which I have come to know ± that science has no
explanation for. This pattern is something that can be found from the greatest things, to the
very basics ± I challenge you to find it as we go along.

Here are 3 images of actual distant galaxies taken by the

hubble telescope ± scientists call them spiral galaxies, and I
have to admit that there are other types of galaxies in the
universe, however spiral galaxies by far outnumber any other
type of galaxy which can be found. As a matter of fact, so
much that the other galaxies which are out there that are not
spiral galaxies are considered galaxies with anomalies.
Obviously if I am going to show any type of pattern, I must
start with the biggest known thing that I can find, and as far
as I know ± galactic size is about the biggest.
Stepping it down a notch we find that our own solar system has a fundamentally similar
pattern in it. If you notice the orbits of the planets ± they dynamically rotate around our
Sun. If we were to remove the lines, representing the orbits ± and instead animated the
revolutions, it becomes even more clear, however I am not able to post an animated
representation, so for that you will have to do an online search, or you can see a great
example found here: http://janus.astro.umd.edu/SolarSystems/c

cc
 
cc
cc 
cccccc
c
 c
c
c  
c

 cc cc 
c

 c
c cc
ccc
c  cc c

cc 
c
 cc ccccc
cc
c
cc  cc
c c
cc cc 
c

c
cc 

cc cc

cc
c
c ets get our head out of space, and into the clouds ± we can see the same type of pattern
evolve all the way from the furthest reaches of space, onto our very own planet earth.
Coincidence? Perhaps ± that¶s why it is important to trace it further down even still, to make
sure that these types of patterns are still staying together.

cc

c
ccc 
 !ccc cc

cc
c"c c  c
c
  c

# c ccccc  cc
$ c
  
ccc cc

ccc
  c cccc
c
c"c
c

c c
c  cc
cc c c

 cc cc

c c ccc

ccc 
c  ccccc
c

 c
cc
c
cc
 ets take it even deeper, to the left we have human skin ± to the right we have plant tissue
± can you see the pattern still present? If you do not ± please keep in mind that you have to
look outside of the box sometimes, to actually see what is in it.

c
c

One of these is a human egg, the other is a sheep¶s egg, which one is which? In truth it
doesn¶t really matter ± what does matter is the pattern, even down at this level.  ets keep
on going down

Here we have red blood cells on the right, a red and white blood cell in the middle ± what
do you think the right picture is of? It looks very similar to the white blood cell ± however it
is the H1N1 virus, even this adheres to the pattern we have been following and I hope you
can see the pattern maturing as well ± onward we go
ccc

We are almost at the end of our journey ± at the chromosomes, and then finally the prize
which follows the pattern all the way up to the very largest principals in our known universe
± and that is the DNA strand. Notice the pattern yet, if not it would be wise to go to the
very beginning and start all over.  et us drift down just a little bit further and we will be
done.

c
cc

 c cc 
ccc 

c c"cc
c
 cc c cc
c cc
 c"c
cc
c
  cc  c"ccc
cc
 cc"cccc  ccc
cc
ccc c%c

 &c

 cc c
c
c
 cc
c
‰ven the little snowflake has the principals and properties of the grand design that has been
unraveling since our start, is it all coincidence? I don¶t think so ± but you have to be the one
to decide if all of this was built in chaos, or built by hands that had a design in mind. If you
are still trying to piece things together I will explain, that everything which is present on
earth or elsewhere ± has order. There is no order in chaos, there is no way to maintain
balance in it. The dynamics which have been illustrated only scratch the surface of showing
a design and structure in creation itself. There are many other forms and facets ± but they
will all converge on the same premise as that which is touched on in this chapter. Moreso ±
if we can find a common form from the outer reaches and see this same form/process here
on earth, it is more than just coincidence ± it becomes scientific evidence of something far
greater than we are conceiving.

One of the hardest things to do is to take what we have had

imprinted into our minds as fact , since youth, and
restructure the thought process to something completely
different then what we are familiar with. If we allow other¶s
perception to become our reality, then we have the
perception of another and not our own. One can jump into
the middle of a concept , and come to understand and accept
that concept ± but unless one goes back to the basics and
research the entirety of the concept, truly understanding the
dynamics are lost and as a result, the person is blindly
embracing its origins.

To touch on Darwinism, not to the degree that many

scientists and scholars do to this day, I would like to point out some huge contradictions
that capsize his basic theories on ‰volution ± which can easily be identified by anyone who
knows at least a little about the sciences. The main premise of his theory on evolution is the
widely held notion that all life is related and has descended from a common ancestor: the
birds and the bananas, the fishes and the flowers -- all related. Darwin's general theory
presumes the development of life from non-life and stresses a purely naturalistic
(undirected) "descent with modification". That is, complex creatures evolve from more
simplistic ancestors naturally over time. In a nutshell, as random genetic mutations occur
within an organism's genetic code, the beneficial mutations are preserved because they aid
survival -- a process known as "natural selection." These beneficial mutations are passed on
to the next generation. Over time, beneficial mutations accumulate and the result is an
entirely different organism (not just a variation of the original, but an entirely different
creature).

These variations cannot be proven as a science ± the basic development of a species of

creature can and do change over time, due to migration and exposure of variation in
climate. By mapping the Y chromosome of the male species of any given creature ± some
variations over time can be seen, but absolutely nothing which suggests an entirely different
species of creature, animal, or human being. On top of this, the chromosomes of plants, and
animals ± do not map on a similar or compatible level which would suggest any association
to one another.

This difference suggests that basic plant life, and microbes are from two distinctly different
origins. This variation alone causes a major hole in Darwin¶s theory.

The next part of Darwin¶s proposal suggests Natural Selection. Natural selection acts to
preserve and accumulate minor advantageous genetic mutations. Suppose a member of a
species developed a functional advantage (it grew wings and learned to fly). Its offspring
would inherit that advantage and pass it on to their offspring. The inferior (disadvantaged)
members of the same species would gradually die out, leaving only the superior
(advantaged) members of the species. Natural selection is the preservation of a functional
advantage that enables a species to compete better in the wild. Natural selection is the
naturalistic equivalent to domestic breeding. Over the centuries, human breeders have
produced dramatic changes in domestic animal populations by selecting individuals to
breed. Breeders eliminate undesirable traits gradually over time. Similarly, natural selection
eliminates inferior species gradually over time.

If we are to take this and use it on humans in a lab experiment, we would come to find the
very same thing that Hitler did during his experiments into creating a perfected race, the
Aryans. The Nazis learned that selectively creating children from two sources which fit a
strict criteria ± did not produce the results they were looking for ± which was a smarter,
stronger breed of humans. There have been several well documented experiments out there
which closely resemble this concept, but all have the same results ± failure to achieve their
goal.
Breeding one type of dog with another, will produce a mixed litter- but none of these
animals ± despite their intermixed state, would inherit any super genes which would leave
them above the rest of the others. Selective breeding of animals, despite the genetic
differences, would not allow them to have any superior qualities over their counterparts.
Dogs will never grow wings, it is not part of their genetic makeup ± and unless a gross
mutation on a pretty large scale occurs, they never will. The old term ³when pigs fly´ is
what comes to mind, according to Darwin, it¶s only a matter of time ± even though it is not
even realistic to perceive.

Moving aside from Darwin, and the 1800s ± into current 21st century biology
± the evolutionary theory declares that everything has a mere appearance of
design. Richard Dawkins, author of The Blind Watchmaker and a professor at
Oxford University (U.K.), is probably the leading proponent of evolutionary
theory since the death of Stephen Jay Gould.

Dawkins writes:

³Biology is the study of complicated things that give the appearance of having been
designed for a purpose.´

He goes on to say:

³...the living results of natural selection overwhelmingly impress us with the appearance of
design as if by a master watchmaker...´

Dawkins is an atheist who

staunchly maintains that the design
we see is merely an illusion -- that
these amazingly complex systems
are an accidental product of natural
selection. In ° other fields of
human endeavor we find that
"design necessitates a designer."
Design detection methodology is a
prerequisite for many disciplines,
including archaeology,
anthropology, forensics, criminal
jurisprudence, copyright law,
patent law, reverse engineering,
crypto-analysis, random number
generation, and S‰TI (the Search
for ‰xtra-Terrestrial Intelligence).
In general, we find "specified
complexity" to be a reliable
indicator of the presence of
intelligent design. Chance can explain complexity, but not specification. A random sequence
of letters can be complex, but not specified (it is meaningless). A Shakespearean sonnet is
both complex and specified (it is meaningful). You can't have a Shakespearean sonnet
without Shakespeare, just as you cannot have an amazing and interwoven complexity which
can be tracked from distant galaxies, all the way down to the very core of our existence ±
without an intelligent designer behind it all.

What about Organic life from inorganic (chemical) material?

Could life evolve randomly from inorganic matter? Not according to mathematicians.

In the last 30 years a number of prominent scientists have attempted

to calculate the odds that a free-living, single-celled organism, such as
a bacterium, might result by the chance combining of pre-existent
building blocks. Harold Morowitz calculated the odds as one chance in
10 to the 100,000,000,000th power. Sir Fred Hoyle calculated the
odds of only the proteins of an amoebae arising by chance as one
chance in 10 to the 40,000th power.

...the odds calculated by Morowitz and Hoyle

are staggering. The odds led Fred Hoyle to
state that the probability of spontaneous
generation 'is about the same as the
probability that a tornado sweeping through
a junk yard could assemble a Boeing 747
from the contents therein.' Mathematicians
tell us that any event with an improbability
greater than one chance in 10 to the 50th
power is in the realm of metaphysics -- i.e. a
miracle.

Sciences have been able to do many things, but science has not been able to take (as the
bible already covers in Genesis) a combination of all the basic building blocks of life, in raw
form ± and create life from it. I have seen the results where chemists have tried, and the
most they have came up with ± was a overpriced petri-dish that they claim ³life grew out of
our chemical soup´ ± when they have only made conditions good and ripe for microbes and
fungi to grow on the side of glass. But the microbes and fungi were already present. If you
have a seed, spore, or any active/dormant organism, with the proper conditions ± you can
make it grow ± and this is exactly what they have done. Science will never be able to
engineer a living creature, without living material to start with ± period.

The thoughts out there are endless, and just when it doesn¶t seem that there is any other
argument into the case, someone has to scream against God with another hair-brained
notion that their intellect supersedes every mathematician, every scholar in history, and all
the collective works of our sciences ± and attempt to offer God as a myth, and their
explanation holds the real truth. For shame, do your math ± if you¶re not good at it then let
a real mathematician give you the odds for your idea. If your idea has odds greater that 10
to the 50th power, you might want to reconsider the possibilities.

The scientific community strongly tries to persuade the world that we have evolved
for billions of years, yet science already admits to the provable Cretaceous±Tertiary
extinction event, which occurred approximately 65.5 million years ago and wiped out an
extremely large amount of life on the earth. Most of the great predators along with most
vegetation and plant eaters died off because of the food scarcity. And, lets not forget about
the Toba supereruption (Youngest Toba Tuff) which occurred between 69,000 and 77,000
years ago at  ake Toba (Sumatra, Indonesia), and it is recognized as one of ‰arth's largest
known eruptions. The related catastrophe theory holds that this supervolcanic event
plunged the planet into a 6 to 10 year volcanic winter. Some researchers argue that the
Toba eruption produced not only a catastrophic volcanic winter but also an additional 1,000-
year cooling episode for the entire world. Monkeys and all plant/fruit eating creatures would
have been systematically wiped out. Science have stated, if not proved that most if not all
fresh water creatures would have been wiped out ± starting with the smallest of species,
then a chain reaction occurring in the ecological food chain. Yet, from these events ± so
much diversity could spring forth in the abundance that we have today. Frogs became birds
and cockroaches became men.

Despite how the science community wishes to present their ³facts´ ± if you take a
creature into a different climate or diversify their conditions, they are not going to mutate
(and I have to use this term because evolution = mutation) into another being ± without a
key element, a hidden factor behind this mutation, which is much different than natural
adaptation. Science may argue that natural causes (or selection) can cause this mutation,
but for this to be fundamentally stable ± there would be no limitation, and all creatures
would have to follow the same principal ± that we are all on the same path of convergence,
or all be mutating toward a common ³super species´ ± since we originated from the same
principal points in the evolutionary chain.

If we take all scientific accounts into our existence, and the existence of many other
species, science itself proves that the theories which exist today very unreliable and fallible.
Suppose that some species did exist and survive during these large catastrophic events
(and I am sure that they did) ± it would mean that these surviving creatures (and plants),
are the common roots to all other life that exists today. Which would also mean that
evolution, would have had to start over with these few existing creatures ± and be only
69,000 ± 77,000 years young from present day ±we would have fossil evidence of these
great changes, dating 77k forward ± instead, when we look at fossil evidences, we look as
far back as we can hoping to make the connection when there should be substantial
evidences from recent history. In truth, there is not a long enough time span to have the
diversity that we have today, at least according to the sciences which support the idea of
evolution.
 There are so many things and people out there which try and cover up or condemn
the testimony (inspired by God, the divine) of simple fishermen, carpenters, shepherds, and
tradesmen that our sciences are unearthing today, as being genuine and true. On all
accounts, there is more compelling evidence of biblical history holding firm in truth, just
through archeology ± then all of the theoretical views on this earth, combined.

The bible itself does not indicate the time span from the first day, to the second day,
to the third day for God ± and who would know that time span, without being God himself ±
which is the author of time itself? When we take into consideration that ³man´ as we know
ourselves to be today, science admits that 50 thousand years or so ago, Homo Sapiens
started ³showing up´ ± their answer is evolution. They also claim that they replaced the
other hominid like species by cross breeding them out ± but when you start getting into
dominant/recessive genes and breeding, the genes are passed on ± meaning there would
still be evidence of cavemen like traits in our makeup and there is not. Homo Sapiens
(according to science) were the minority ± and became the majority, with all other hominid
like species disappearing ± our sciences prove that Neanderthals and Homo Sapiens were
two distinctly different species living on earth at the same time.

The next argument that I have heard is

that monkeys, men, and apes of today all
share common ancestors ± yet when
proof is asked, we are given either
fabricated examples (incomplete and even
mixed bone/fossil evidence) which
support the argument of the evolutionists.
Or we are given no examples at all ± or
species which are the closest they can
come up with ± which AR‰ a nonrelated
species of creatures.

We associate Gorillas, Baboons, chimpanzees, proboscis

monkeys, spider monkeys, and woolly monkeys all to fit into
the same category ³Monkey´ ± and while they do carry similar
traits, they are all different species. A baboon can never hope
to be a gorilla, and never will be ± to be so generalized in our
approach to things instead of recognizing some of the most
simplest of laws we fail completely. We also do the same
association with ³Dinosaurs´ ± yet not all were even close in
resemblance, or even semi similar in nature. According to
science ± there were humanlike beings even back in this age ±
even though they have no actual substantial or credible proof
to support it.

When God created life ± He did so, in great diversity ± not in generality. So we find
white wooly tigers in cold regions, and those found in Africa or india, creationists believe
that they were at one time the same, and traveled into these areas and their bodies started
changing. While I believe that adaptation can and does occur ± if you were to take a dark
black man and a dark black woman, and took them into Siberia ± and isolated them; as
long as there is no outside interference ± the children of their children¶s children are not
going to become lighter in color so that they can absorb more light. Nor will a white family if
taken to Africa and the same experiments performed, ever produce black children. Have we
truly become that ignorant to believe these sorts of things?

When God created Adam, and ‰ve ± He created them unique ± upright, and apart
from all of His other creation. The bible does not say that there weren¶t other species of
humanoid like creatures on the earth ± which were not called ³man´ and ³woman´. The
bible also does not set an upper or lower limit to the species which were created, or when
they were created.

It is almost incomprehensible to think that apes

(³primates´) such as gorillas, chimpanzees, and
other monkeys could exist in our timeframe and
we somehow mutated from them ± and there be
no trace of cavemen (troglodytes, Neanderthals,
etc) existing today. It¶s my understanding that
the sub-species of the homo sapiens would be far
better equipped and able to survive over the
lesser primate species.  et science try to explain
that one. The fact of the matter is, they cannot.

A pastor of the ³Mexico Beach Civic Center´ wrote

the following excerpt, and I support their
statements ± as the evidence out there
substantiates it:

³³Here's the truth about the so-called human ancestors:

Very few of the skeletons, of the so called "human ancestors" or cave men, are complete, or
even nearly complete. In fact, all of the highly publicized ones are fraudulent for one
reason or another.  et's look at the record:

Neanderthal Man

First a skull cap was found, and then some relatively complete skeletons were found, in
Germany, around the turn of the century. The first relatively complete skeleton appeared
stooped over, and hunch-backed. This was heralded as the missing link, that Darwin had
said must be found. Suggested dates for Neanderthal Man have ranged from a few
thousand years old to perhaps a hundred thousand years old.
Modern science has since shown, however, that the ape-like
appearance came from a disease,- probably a vitamin deficiency.
Today all reputable scientists classify Neanderthal Man as fully human
- homo sapiens. Modern human beings, living in our age have been
found to have Neanderthal type skeletal structures.

The following statement came from a prominent scientist this year.

Bill Kimbel, science director of the Institute of Human Origins at
Arizona State University said, " Scientists used to think Homo Sapiens
evolved from Neanderthals, a closely related species, he said, but
now know that both species lived during the same time period, and
that W‰ DID NOT COM‰ FROM TH‰ N‰AND‰RTHA S. "  ittle by little
we are learning the truth, as the evolutionists admit their errors. Child͛s Skeleton with Rickets

But, YOU STI   FIND N‰AND‰RTHA  MAN AS A POSSIB ‰ HUMAN ANC‰STOR IN

T‰ TBOOKS! What does that tell you about our modern educational system?

Piltdown Man

Around 1912 some bones, teeth, and primitive

implements were found in Piltdown, Sussex,
‰ngland. The remains were claimed to be
500,000 years old, and the finding was endorsed
by the media, and the scientific community.

In 1956 this find came to be known as "The Great

Piltdown Hoax", when it was learned that the
whole thing had been fabricated. The teeth had
been filed. And, both teeth and bones had been
treated chemically to make them look old! This
demonstrates how easily scientists can be fooled,
when they want desperately to prove that
evolution is a fact.

But, YOU STI   FIND PI TDOWN MAN AS A

POSSIB ‰ HUMAN ANC‰STOR IN SOM‰ of the
MOD‰RN T‰ TBOOKS! What does that tell you
about our modern educational system?

Nebraska Man

A scientist named Harold Cook discovered ON‰ FOSSI IZ‰D TOOTH in Nebraska in 1922,
just in time for it to be introduced into evidence at the famous Scopes trial. At the time, it
was portrayed in the media as coming from a race of ape-like humans about 1 million years
old. An artist representation appeared in a popular national magazine, a full page, in living
color, showing Nebraska Man, and his family, in primitive surroundings, all based upon that
one tooth!
 Not too long afterwards, the tooth
was found to belong to an extinct
peccary! ( a pig like animal ) Yet
there are still school books today
that portray this fraud as a missing
link. It has been observed that our
family tree is kind of slippery.
Ancestors hold on there, for a few
years, then they slip off!

But, you still find Nebraska Man as a

possible human ancestor in
textbooks! What does that tell you
about our modern educational
system?

Peking Man

A pile of broken skulls was allegedly found near Peking, China early in the last century.
While plaster casts supposedly taken of one or more skulls exist today, the originals are
nowhere to be found. This is one of the supposed ancestors who are termed homo erectus
. Various theories abound concerning these skulls, but since the fossil skulls are not
available for examination, this is hardly scientific evidence.

But, you still find Peking Man as a possible human ancestor in textbooks! What does that
tell you about our modern educational system?

Java Man

The other main representative, that is supposedly homo

erectus , is Java Man. In 1891, a small piece of the top of
a skull, three molar teeth, and a fragment of a left thigh
bone were found in Java. These were not found together,
but some distance apart.

Much skepticism has come from the fact that these

fragments were found some distance apart. The
discoverer, himself, stated not too long ago, that he
thought that these came, not from an ape-like man,
but from a gibbon. Parts of these fragments look
very human like while the remaining parts look very
ape like, indicating that they were very likely not
from the same creature. But, you still find Java Man
listed as a possible human ancestor in textbooks! What does that tell you about our
modern educational system?

 ucy

Much has been written about a 1/2 complete fossil skeleton of a young female, ape like
creature, of about 12 years in age found in ‰thiopia in the mid 70's. At the time, this was
heralded as a representative of the oldest human ancestors, over a million years old. Most
textbooks, even today, use this as their strongest evidence for human evolution.

The whole scam fell apart, not

too long ago, when the
discoverer himself, admitted
that the thigh bone, ( the key
piece in the whole speculation
that "  ucy " walked upright )
was found over 1/2 mile away
from the rest of the skeleton,
and obviously was not from the
same skeleton !

Yet, YOU STI   FIND "  UCY "

AS A POSSIB ‰ TYP‰ OF
HUMAN ANC‰STOR IN
MOD‰RN T‰ TBOOKS! What
does that tell you about our
modern educational system?

Summary

Yes, there are other supposed

missing links. The CO‰ ACANTH
was supposedly a missing link
between fish and land animals,
until a fisherman caught one off
the coast of Madagascar in 1938.
Since then, a number of these
unusual creatures have been
caught. Obviously, it's no longer
a missing link! But the pattern
has been established. First the
discovery, then the big media
splash. Then 20-50 years later,
the truth comes out,- a hoax, a
distortion, a fraud, or a mistake. As I write this page, I am looking at a recent Biology
text. It contains most of the errors I have described above,- still stated as fact. Yes, our
public school students are being deceived into accepting the evolution myth. Based upon
the pattern which we have seen, you can trust that new discoveries will be debunked, just
as these older ones have been. ³´

Darwin may be comfortable with the notion that one of his great ancestors was once a
toadstool, but 21st science has already proved him wrong, and is continuing to do so. In
order to have true science, one must substantiate it as fact. In order to substantiate
something as fact ± all evidences have to support it, and continue to support it fully ± from
every aspect and angle. We instead teach unsubstantiated, incomplete, and even tampered
evidences as the truth ± instead of being honest with everyone. To me, this inconsistency
shows that we cannot accept the validity that the scientific community is going to protect
and safeguard against falsities and not make claims until ³fact´ can be validated as credible.
Remember, substantial evidence does not deem something as being factual until it can be
proven as such without any reasonable doubt. Having even 20 intact and full skeletons of
ancient times to speak for all of mankind upon the face of this earth ± is not enough to
postulate it into complete truth and gospel. Science is deemed all things provable, yet it
cannot prove the evolutionists claims ± and the other sciences surrounding the theory (and
that is, what it still is) do not support it, so that would mean that one of the sciences is
truth, and the others which do not support it are un-credible and unreliable.

One of the biggest speakers in this world who opposes God and Creation, and supports
‰volution is none other than Richard Dawson (as discussed earlier in this chapter). During
an interview with Ben Stein, in a movie/documentary entitled ³‰xpelled´ ± Dawson was
confronted with a very intriguing question by Stein. Partial transcripts of the movie are
below:

This is a partial text of the interview of Richard Dawkins by Ben Stein in the film ‰xpelled.
This is the key section in which Richard Dawkins acknowledges that it is possible to find
evidence of design in biology, and that it could have been seeded here by a "higher
intelligence" from elsewhere in the universe.

B‰N ST‰IN: How did it get created?

DAWKINS: By a very slow process.

B‰N ST‰IN: Well, how did it start?

DAWKINS: Nobody knows how it got started. We know the kind of event that it must have
been. We know the sort of event that must have happened for the origin of life.

B‰N ST‰IN: And what was that?

DAWKINS: It was the origin of the first self-replicating molecule.

B‰N ST‰IN: Right, and how did that happen?

DAWKINS: I told you, we don¶t know.

...

B‰N ST‰IN: What do you think is the possibility that Intelligent Design might turn out to be
the answer to some issues in genetics or in Darwinian evolution.

DAWKINS: Well, it could come about in the following way. It could be that at some earlier
time, somewhere in the universe, a civilization evolved, probably by some kind of Darwinian
means, probably to a very high level of technology, and designed a form of life that they
seeded onto perhaps this planet. Um, now that is a possibility, and an intriguing possibility.
And I suppose it¶s possible that you might find evidence for that if you look at the details of
biochemistry, molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer.

...

And that Designer could well be a higher intelligence from elsewhere in the universe. But
that higher intelligence would itself have had to have come about by some explicable, or
ultimately explicable process. It couldn't have just jumped into existence spontaneously.
That's the point.

To me, Dawkins explanation is crazier than the thought that God exists ± so the question
has to be proposed, Who has delusions? Dawkins wrote the book ³The God Delusion´ ± but
I¶d have to say, that if there is anyone walking around creating delusions, it would be
Dawkins.

If you would like to see the clip first hand, it can be found here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKpAZHrpD2k

Not only does this man know nothing about God biblically, He seems to admit God by his
own hateful and vindictive words against Him. Why would he feel compelled to write such,
in his own words, to a ³nonexistent and fictitious being´?


Y


  
Stepping back to the ³footprint´ which I presented in my first chapter and saying it was
much deeper than it appears, our ancestors knew it. Below is ancient representations of the
same ± in American Indian pictographs, in old ‰gyptian glyphs, in ancient Greek art, in
ancient pottery, buildings, old ‰nglish ceremony sites, in ancient African art ± and many
more illustrations of the same can be found, including in sacred rites and ³magical´
symbolism.
The majority of the circles signify (astonishingly) life, time, creation, or spirit throughout the
known world. This is not a coincidence ± nor is it a coincidence that this identifier is pretty
much the same throughout all the tribes around the world. We ³think´ that our ancestors
could not possibly conceive things on that level because they were not a developed people
through our modern sciences and way of thinking.

What do these spiral and circular based creations represent? What is the significance behind
them and why can we find that almost every culture used them for spiritual purposes and
meaning? I cannot begin to explain because it is part of the ancient world ± but one thing is
clear regarding them ± all points of life and creation follow that principal and it seems our
forefathers knew a bit more than we give them credit for.

With our culture, we are constantly trying to perfect the wheel ± but with this constant
perfection we create a great amount of flaw and imperfection. We took something which
was working perfect already and traded it in for a new model. This modernization of every
aspect is where we lose the benefit of having something truly valuable. Cars which were
designed in the 50s and 60s were the best of our time - but we were not satisfied, we had
to continue to modernize and accessorize. Making a lighter, cheaper, streamline and
dynamic car that talks, and does everything but drive (which is only a matter of time says
some auto manufacturers).

But when has science and the advancement of human endeavors ‰V‰R achieved the
spiritual? Though some may sanctify it as being the gospel ± it has never and will never
cross past the veil of the spirit world. When we attempt to go back to the ancient ways, we
find that we are in a gridlock, which we created for ourselves. All the ancient knowledge and
practices have been wiped out by modernization, a forced belief system onto the Native
Americans (convert or die), diseases which were brought from ‰urope have extinguished
many tribes outright (polio, smallpox, killer flus to name a few), ‰uropean instigated
³sacking´ of Indian villages, slavery. And the list goes on and on of the various acts against
the ancient world, which has led us to today.

As we have made strides and advances in our own modern achievements, we rely less and
less on the spiritual world to guide us in our answers. Why ask God for things when we can
asks doctors, scientists, politicians, and those which seem to be visionaries of our modern
day and age? We have the ultimate repository of collected data and information at our
disposal with only a few mouse clicks and keystrokes. We can find any amount of
information in a variety of degrees and formats ± without even touching a book, or without
even consulting someone else for thoughts or opinions.

All the while ± we get only a partial perspective, without any understanding of the
dynamics, mechanics, or broader view which allows us to identify faults within the
teachings. We accept because we have become too lazy, like having a remote for the TV
instead of getting up to turn a knob and change a channel ± but on a much larger and
grander scale. We want someone else to do the work for us, and when someone comes up
with something that just seems to be good, we say ³that sounds or seems right enough for
me´ ± and just accept it as being fact. But we go even further, not only do we accept it as
being fact (such as Darwin and other evolutionist¶s beliefs) ± the institutions cram these
things into the minds of our youth in hopes of creating a singular belief system inside and
outside of any spiritual understanding of our existence.

Now, it may sound that I am totally against theories and practical applications of science
and it¶s foundations ± and that I am against everything which Darwin and others like him
have speculated and hypothesized, but I am not. I love the sciences, and I am absolutely
intrigued by where and how far we have come with them ± but that is with real sciences,
and not science fiction. To the immediate left, you have God ± and to the immediate right,
you have those which systematically try to extinguish any notion of God¶s existence by
fashioning their own views and trying to get those which don¶t know any better to support
and believe them. Science is one thing, but anyone ± even the most hardened scientific
minds, will freely admit ± that if something cannot legitimately be proven into fact, it¶s not
science. Individuals running around trying to sculpt their own personal beliefs onto the
backbone of scientific facts, are heretical, and historically have been deemed cultists or mad
(insane).

The human engine is falling apart, and the ones that are running the show ± are running it
for all of us. We are more willing to accept, rather than to question and condemn incorrect
doctrines and teachings. We have fell into a cult like ideology, and raise the minds of the
mighty confused, into positions greater than that of God Himself. Should we even dare to
question why our society is so lost and obsessed with its own selfish interests or why our
children become ruthless and unruly?

We have missed the mark, we have failed to achieve greatness not only as a people but
individually, because we refuse to take a step back and relearn the sovereign ways of our
ancestors and how they had things right, where we do not.

Our ancestors held us, kept us, and were much stronger as a nation, as a tribe, and as
individuals ± than we could ever hope to achieve. ‰ven our own ³Declaration of
Independence´ and its original intentions are ignored ± the declaration starts with ³We The
People´ ± where the only application of ³We´ seen greatly in our nation anymore is for self
centered purposes.

c
Y
 
A show called ³500 Nations´, hosted and co-produced by Kevin Costner ± changed my life
forever, I became ‰ TR‰M‰ Y upset after watching it due to the countless horrors our
country is currently resting upon. I knew many things about the Native American Indians
but there were many things which I didn¶t know. Our history books (the ones which we are
given in Jr. High, High School, and even College) do not paint an appropriate picture of how
this nation (the United States) was established, or ³won´. I would suggest any individual
reading this book to watch the mini-series in full so that you can be on the same page as I
am when I say, that the United States should not be allowed to stand today.

Our founders and forefathers, of you want to consider them that (Jefferson, Washington,
etc) did not want the full truth to be revealed. However because there was no way to stop
the Indians from recording the events, nor was it possible to stop peacekeepers and those
which opposed the horrid treatment of the Ancients from recording events in journals,
letters, and other forms of documentations and declarations- the true information, intent,
and actions were revealed. What disgusts me and disgraces me to this day, about our
³great´ country ± is the condemnation and advantages are still taken against the American
Indians now.

It has not stopped, even in our ³cultured and refined´ society ± we still are robbing them of
their land, the old agreements/treaties are not being honored and enforced, and as the
tribes of the nation are still shrinking because of horrible conditions on the reservations,
polluted waters, and infringements of their land, soil, livestock, streams and rivers, and
their very culture. A tiny example of the atrocities is listed below, in truth ± there was
conquest after conquest upon the native American Indians, until they were almost
completely exterminated.

Andrew Jackson made his reputation fighting Indians; he believed that the Indians
³wandering habits of life´ engrossed too much valuable land, and that only ³necessity
would prompt them to industry and agriculture.´ ........

....
Jackson from the start rejected Indian claims to tribal lands²he would concede individual
farms, but adamantly denied tribal jurisdictions.
....
The 
 c 
c°
cc 
In 1831 the Supreme Court ruled that five ³civilized tribes´ were not sovereign like a foreign
nation and could not sue in federal court, but the next year John Marshall ruled that on
Cherokee land ....Georgia.. ..laws did not apply to Indian Nations. Georgia ignored the
court¶s ruling and President Jackson refused to back the court's decision. He said, ³John
Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it.´
The Trail of Tears was the relocation and movement of Native Americans, including many
members of the Cherokee, Creek, Seminole, and Choctaw nations among others in the
United States, from their homelands to Indian Territory (present day Oklahoma) in the
Western United States. The phrase originated from a description of the removal of the
Choctaw Nation in 1831.Many Native Americans suffered from exposure, disease, and
starvation while en route to their destinations, and many died, including 4,000 of the
15,000 relocated Cherokee.

In 1831, the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Muscogee-Creek, and Seminole (sometimes

collectively referred to as the Five Civilized Tribes) were living as autonomous nations in
what would be called the American Deep South. The process of cultural transformation
(proposed by George Washington and Henry Knox) was gaining momentum, especially
among the Cherokee and Choctaw. Andrew Jackson was the first U.S. President to
implement removal of the Native Americans with the passage of the Indian Removal Act of
1830. In 1831 the Choctaw were the first to be removed, and they became the model for all
other removals. After the Choctaw, the Seminole were removed in 1832, the Creek in 1834,
then the Chickasaw in 1837, and finally the Cherokee in 1838.After removal, some Native
Americans remained in their ancient homelands - the Choctaw are found in Mississippi, the
Seminole in Florida, the Creek in Alabama, and the Cherokee in North Carolina. A limited
number of ‰uropeans and Africans (usually as slaves) also accompanied the Native
American nations on the trek westward. By 1837, 46,000 Native Americans from these
southeastern nations had been removed from their homelands thereby opening 25 million
acres for settlement by whites.

~~

Aren¶t you proud to be an "American"?

The old cliché "That was a long time ago, it wasn¶t right but it's not happening today" or "Its
not my fault" ... No? The system which you/we embrace was, and still is the law. Did the US
even try to ratify the holocaust it created? No .. As a matter of fact, many of our
current laws have encapsulated the tribes to the point of almost utter extinction.

We all look at the German / Nazi holocaust with utter fright and disgust - but our own
governing leaders which we esteem so greatly for their fearlessness and might, were a
bunch of Hitler¶s before he was even on the map. Yet most don¶t even bat an eyelash at it
because we were taught many lies about our early beginnings as a "proud nation".
How is what we did to the Native Americans, any different than what Hitler did in the
concentration camps?

Under Union Flag, a man by the name of General Philip Sheridan was a extremely great
tactician and won many battles. In 1888 he was promoted to the rank of four-star general
by President Grover Cleveland (I need to remind you, we are only talking 132 years ago -
not thousands of years ago) - him, along with many other "leaders" and "American people"
which shared his views - were outright racists against the Indians.

The Indians on the Great Plains had been generally peaceful during the Civil War. In 1864,
Major John Chivington, a Colorado militia officer, attacked a peaceful village of Arapahos
and Southern Cheyenne at Sand Creek in Colorado, killing over 150 Indians. That attack
ignited a general war with the Indians. The protection of the Great Plains fell under the
Department of the Missouri, an administrative area of over 1,000,000 mi. , encompassing
all land between the Mississippi River and the Rocky Mountains. Maj. Gen. Winfield S.
Hancock was assigned to the department in 1866, but had mishandled his campaign,
resulting in Sioux and Cheyenne raids of retaliation.

The Indians continued to attack mail coaches, burn the stations, and kill the employees.
They also raped, killed, and kidnapped a considerable number of settlers on the frontier to
try and put fear of a larger retaliation in the minds of the ³US Government System´. Under
pressure from the various governors in the Great Plains, General Grant turned to Phil
Sheridan. In September 1866, Sheridan arrived at the former Fort Martin Scott near
Fredericksburg, Texas, where he spent three months subduing Indians in the Texas Hill
Country.

In August 1867, Grant appointed Sheridan to head the Department of the Missouri and
pacify the Plains. His troops, even supplemented with state militia, were spread too thin to
have any real effect. He conceived a strategy similar to the one he used in the Shenandoah
Valley. In the Winter Campaign of 1868±69 he attacked the Cheyenne, Kiowa, and
Comanche tribes in their winter quarters, taking their supplies and livestock and killing
those who resisted, driving the rest back into their reservations. By promoting in
Congressional testimony the hunting and slaughter of the vast herds of American Bison on
the Great Plains and by other means, Sheridan helped deprive the Indians of their primary
source of food. Professional hunters, trespassing on Indian land, killed over 4 million bison
by 1874. Sheridan wrote, " et them kill, skin and sell until the buffalo is exterminated".
When the Texas legislature considered outlawing bison poaching on tribal lands, Sheridan
personally testified against it in Austin, Texas. He suggested that the legislature should give
each of the hunters a medal, engraved with a dead buffalo on one side and a discouraged-
looking Indian on the other. This strategy continued until the Indians honored their treaties.
Sheridan's department conducted the Red River War, the Ute War, and the Great Sioux War
of 1876-77, which resulted in the death of a trusted subordinate,  t. Col. George Armstrong
Custer. The Indian raids subsided during the 1870s and were almost over by the early
1880s, as Sheridan became the commanding general of the U.S. Army.
There is an anecdote told concerning Sheridan during his campaign against the Indians.
Comanche Chief Tosawi, or Silver Knife, reputedly told Sheridan in 1869, "Me Tosawi. Me
good Indian," to which Sheridan is said to have replied, "The only good Indians I ever saw
were dead." This was then misquoted as "The only good Indian is a dead Indian". Sheridan
later denied he had made the statement to Tosawi. ‰arlier that year, on May 28, Rep.
James M. Cavanaugh said in the House, "I have never seen in my life a good Indian ...
except when I have seen a dead Indian." That remark may have been mistakenly attributed
to Sheridan.

Almost every indian tribe and clan followed these divine principals "Honor the Creator, Do
not take life except in self defense, do not steal or destroy the property of others, deal
honestly with everyone, honor parents and elderly, parents and elders are to provide for
and teach the children, Support law and order and keep the peace, Don't covet, Help the
needy, sick, injured and disabled, perform your contracts with God and man" - there are
many more... ‰ven without a bible. Yet, still ± they were considered the renegades,
fugitives, savages ± we invaded their land, and destroyed the ground which they held
sacred. The Indians could have actually pushed all the invading countries back into the sea
if they would have wanted to ± but the Indians wanted peace, and trade ± and always
turned the other cheek and looked to the gentler solution. Those that came to rape the land
for their own prosperity would not have such a thing.

Spiritually speaking, we are our own chains - the shackles which bind us to hell and death
are from our own creation - and not chains and shackles created by God for us to suffer in.
These shackles and chains which hold us are a refusal of the basic laws of life. These laws or
basic principals are not only found in the bible's passages from Moses - but also found in the
basic instructions and teachings from ever ancient tribe across the world. There is no
coincidence then for the same God/Creator which gave these instructions to every tribe in
the world, to also pass them on to Moses on Mount Sinai. These laws are much older then
Moses himself.

The United states is not founded nor was created using these principals, instead those which
were truly following the standard code of laws given by the creator, were sold as slaves to
our still existent system, or slaughtered and their land stolen from them. If you look at the
ancient tribal beliefs and laws - it¶s almost as if you are reading directly out of the bible's 10
commandments...

It is absolutely embarrassing - that the church "puritans" (the ones that brought "God" onto
the "American soil", also the same ones responsible for the Salem witch trials) that barked
about the bible and God - were trying to get the Indians to convert, or consequentially
labeling them as practitioners of witchcraft, unwelcome at the outposts, heretics, and
pagans/heathens. Many of the Indian children which were taken into these puritan led
schools - were held captive, and they either accepted the belief system - or were sold into
slavery. The real charlatans were the founding roots of our society.
We try to "hush" our history and paint a different picture. So that we do not have to face up
to the fact that our grandfathers, and their fathers and grandfathers, were the reason for all
the death and destruction, the mayhem and murder, the assorted roles to ransack this land
and force its inhabitants into slavery and confinement.. the truth is the truth, deal with it ±
and if you¶re led to, then DO SOM‰THING about it ± but don¶t ignore the truth...

If you all are really interested in knowing more truth about the American Indians and our
history I suggest you buy or rent out Kc   - if you have any heart at all, it will be
upsetting but I value the truth over hushed words any day.

With three different tribes of Indian in my linage, I no longer embrace myself as being an
American, I embrace myself as being of Indian descent. I cannot value or condone any
system that has systematically destroyed a peaceful, loving, and proud culture ± and
reduced them to slaves to a system which does not work, for them or for us. If you really
want to get technical, we are all slaves to this system ± and the US will not tolerate any
less. If you don¶t believe me ± try refusing to pay their taxes. Just because a system exists,
does not make it right ± nor does the information which is given to us to work with, make
the truth complete. We are a parasitic host to a system which does not care about anything
but itself.

We are all subservient to this system which is violent, corrupt, and self indulging ± at our
expense and the most that we can hope for, is someone with a rational and ethical way to
try and pursue (push) our requests through congress and get it accepted and processed into
law ± but how often does this occur one might ask? Not very. When we go back to the
original treaty proposed to the ³American people´ , it starts with ± ³We the people´.. But
what I see, is just another broken promise, just another broken treaty cleverly called a
³declaration´ ± created and resting upon a foundation of lies, deceit and corruption. I could
declare that I see the moon smiling at me ± and by all truth, to me, it probably is. However,
the next gent could come along and declare something totally different.. To declare
something does not make it so just because it was declared ± and you see, the government
knows this and is careful how it appears to the rest of the world, but until the bombs drop
declaring war means squat ± you see, it always has been and always will be, just a game of
words led by corrupt politicians who enable themselves to do just about anything thinkable
to our country, and our people. By me speaking this way, the US of A could declare that I
am a supporter of terrorism or some other label, and because of their weight and shift in
the mass media world, they would do a marvelous job at acquiring the majority vote to this
declaration despite its authenticity ± you win the people, you win the vote. There were
several other cultures and civilizations that also followed these principals, ideas, and
guidelines ± the Ancient Romans and Nazi Germany are both very good examples. The
Roman Senate is in fact a mirror of Congress today, minus the fact that the brightest minds
belonged to the senate of history past ± and today the majority are political bushwhackers.
One of the greatest roman tactics of policy and change, was to create an illusion to the
people ± and get their support, despite what was actually taking place. And this is what
finally led them to their demise as a ³great power´. While their existence as a super power
is no longer present, their teachings live on ± and have been adopted as the ³rule of thumb´
to many structured countries, especially the United States.

For many God fearing Christians, this should be upsetting news, but one needs to unhinge
the construction to actually see what and how it was made ± and what kind of foundation it
is resting on to begin with. Not with books that supports ideas and mixes fact with fiction ±
but historical documents, evidences which were recorded as fact for that time. If you can
find more than just one supporting historical document to support a case, you are on to
something worthy of deeper investigation.

For this very reason, I have dedicated my life to identifying the falsities which man has
brought upon us all. There has been so many times that we have been lured and our minds
corrupted by propaganda that was created to get us to adhere to a certain thought or
teaching process. I say, that we need to break out of the mold and get to the bottom of it
all for all mankind¶s sake. If we continue to keep a cycle of lies revolving, then our children
and the youth of tomorrow will not even have the opportunity to learn any of the ways of
the old ± as even much of these ways are lost forever and we have no way of reclaiming
them, or understanding them. We want to see what we want to see, and when something
radical comes along which does not maintain the ³code´ which we deem as civilized or
appropriate ± we typically will brush it aside, or in the case of the Indians, brush it under
the rug and hope that no one is really looking for the truth about it all.

This applies for all the ancient tribes of the North American continent.. Almost 88% of all
Indian settlements were destroyed at either the hands of the ‰uropean conquests, or the
individual tribes were extinguished completely from the disease infested ‰uropeans that
came over here tainting a healthy balanced eco system and its people. There is no question
where disease comes from, sin.. The ‰uropean communities were excelled in that area, just
as they are to this day. The States have suffered tremendously but not because it was/is a
weak nation, but because the majority of its people care about one thing, themselves. This
was not the way of the Indians ± they cared so much about other tribes, that when they
acquired great wealth ± they shared and distributed it in gift giving to other tribes of the
area. They firmly believed that material wealth was not to be kept, but shared. That makes
each and every one of us, ruthless and vagabond in our own ways.

Most people do not even know what ³Thanksgiving´ is all about, and it¶s a shame because in
that aspect ± there is quite a bit of literature and historical truth, even in the
elementary/high school history books. The Indians helped teach the settlers how to survive
here, to plant and grow crops ± how and where to hunt. At the end of the harvest season,
the natives and settlers got together and did what the Indians were quite accustomed to
doing already, sharing the wealth of the crops, harvest, and season ± and gave in thanks
(Thanks Giving), in honor to the Creator. This was not a pilgrim started tradition; this was a
Native American tradition far before the settlers ever arrived.

So, who are the real savages I ask?

The situation spiritually however leaves a much more grievous wound than it appears on the
surface. We have lost sight of the truth, and by something so big and tragic such as this to
be downplayed and hushed in the educational institutions ± shows the track we are on.
When lies become science, and our spiritual roots become lies ± we are drawing toward an
avalanche of dis-truth, misrepresentations, and false teachings as being the norm to our
way of life, and our very existence.
Y
 
A
 





  
 
 

I have met so many people during the walks of my life ± each holding certain pieces of the
full picture. I have a strong belief even within my own being, that I know ³A few parts about
many things, and many parts of only a few things´. Although my mind acts like a sponge
with new concepts that I learn ± I am banking more on their associations rather than their
specifics. The old coined phrase ³‰verything happens for a reason´ is a force which I have
learned not to question, but there are times I need to reconcile with it because of the lack of
understanding to its ways. People will intercede their own thoughts and feelings into this
³reason´ or ³purpose´ ± and many times will end up with something quite different then
their actual associations. This accosted identification is what causes disillusion between
people ± and that rift, causes a state of confusion and self-propelled separation.

We, being human beings are all on a journey ± as travelers and visitors in a place which we
can only see through our physical eyes, but there is so much more out there holding
everything together which we cannot see.

Science can illustrate them as cosmic forces, whether these ³forces´ are gravitational,
centrifugal, inertial, or any of the other man pondered form factors. They can design and
create machines and instruments which simulate, gauge, and can even generate these
dynamics ± but science fails to truly explain them. Why they are there to begin with.
‰instein and Tesla were both visionaries because they thought outside of the box and came
to realizations how little they (and we) truly know about the forces at work. In truth, they
calculated and built things which ³simulate´ a few of the dynamics in the area of invisible
forces. ‰instein was excellent with his statements that the more he learned, the more he
realized he didn¶t know. We all have a equivocation when it concerns God, the creator. We
put Him in a box and realize Him only to the extent of what we have learned God to be ±
but God is Almighty , and can make anything possible ± far beyond our scope or
comprehension of any sciences we have. God is the sciences, all the mathematics of human
equation flow right back to him, so how will science ever be able to explain that? If we
believe in the laws of man¶s formula, we will never be able conceive God¶s formula.

The same applies to other bases of knowledge of what is, and what isn¶t. Organized religion,
philosophy, and theology all fit under the same clasps of ³human understanding and
reasoning´. The bible, both Old Testament and New Testament are a collected and compiled
works of T‰STIMONY. So is the same of any experiences written down of the natural world,
and the supernatural world. Testimony means that someone has testified to the best of their
abilities ± the events which they were witness to or experienced on a more personal level.
This same term is used in the courtrooms of today ± the exact same way.

By reading an article about how a witch confessed to innocence at the Salem Witch Trials,
reading her story ± reading the stories of all the eye witnesses the day she was tried and
burned. This is, testimony ± because someone felt it necessary to testify to the accounts of
that day. If I were to write down all the experiences of my life, and attempted to explain to
the best of my ability ± lacking in substance or not ± it would still be my testimony.

The bible has been written ± and God¶s word is God¶s word, but to think that the testimony
has ended there is a falsity. God wants us to acknowledge His presence today, and
tomorrow ± just as He did back in the days of the scriptures. If you go searching about
miracles of this day, of great consequence and individual consequence ± you will learn that
the Testament is still being written. Christ wanted us to always acknowledge God, the
Father ± and testify, pay witness to the great things we see from the Father. If we do not do
this, we are without works.

The very same thing applies in our walk, with unique individuals ± who each have different
takes on God, life, the spiritual world, creation, and the internal and external workings of
everything under the sun. But, if we create mutinies for another¶s viewpoints ± we may
inevitably be etching parts of the truth out of the picture, for us and any which learn from
us. No one person knows everything, and no one religious viewpoint can be totally held as
the definitive answer to a Creator which no one can rightfully define.

There are many parallels in this world to find the truth, but one must first be interested in
finding these parallels and spiritually realizing that they all converge to specific things. I will
give you an example of one.

Noah, and the great flood. The bible gives reference to Noah as being the seed in which the
tribe of Judea would be replanted. It does not say that the entire populous of the world
would be destroyed and washed away during this flood, it does however speak of the
lineage of Noah and how it correlates with Israel. While there is scripture pointing to this,
evidence of Noah¶s great quest and journey turns somewhat empty handed as far as proof.
That is of course, if you are only looking for Noah¶s boat as the baseline of the evidence,
and the possibility that the scriptures are accurate, outside the realm of blind faith.

What about the evidence which can easily be identified? Since it is not part of biblical
scripture, most cast out outside notions ± even though they may very well support that
Noah did weather the flood.

 ets look at the ‰gyptians for a moment ± which by every standard, are night and day in
comparison to Judaic belief.

Nu, the ‰gyptian god of the Primeval Sea, is represented on the marble sarcophagus of Seti
I as being up to his waist in water with arms upraised to carry the Solar Boat across the
Sky. The boat, with its ten royal occupants, is being carried above the flood waters
engulfing their mountainous island home in the West. According to Budge (1960), Nu had
been ordered to bring about this very flood by Atum in order to purify the world. Does this
primeval flood scene depict the final migration from the  ands of the West to ‰gypt because
of the sudden loss of Atlantis?
 In the vignette (left) Nu's name is immediately above his
head (Osiris appears at the very top). Hieroglyphs identify
two of the figures on the left as Tehuti (Thoth) and Seb
(Kronos). The legend below the boat reads: "Come forth
from the waters and bear up this god." The text just above
the boat reads: "The god rests in the Ant Boat with the gods
who are with him." (Budge, 1960)

The ‰gyptians knew and recorded a great flood, and not coincidentally do we find something
very amazing about it. Atum is being recorded to have created the flood to ³purify the
world´. This purification process, despite it¶s possible difference in meaning, is identically the
reason the flood of Noah occurred. We will get to the biblical reason for the flood later in the
book ± for now, I want you to see the parallels and understand that it¶s not just one place
that you can account of the great flood ± but in truth, many.

Greece ±

The following article is an excerpt from ³The Story of the Greatest Nations and the World¶s
Famous ‰vents, Vol1´ , a historical reference book first published in 1913 by ‰dward S. ‰llis
and Charles F. Horne, PhD. The book covers ancient times from Babylonia until Greek
civilization.

³ëhen comes the Greek story of the flood. Bereft of Prometheus' guidance, men and women grew so
wicked that Jupiter sent a great flood which destroyed them all, except one good man, Deucalion, a son
of Prometheus, and one good woman, Pyrrha, a daughter of Epimetheus. ëhese two were preserved as
being fit to live. ëhe flood submerged all earth except Mount Olympus, where the gods lived, and Mount
Parnassus, where Deucalion and Pyrrha found shelter. ëhen the waters withdrew, and from the oracle of
Apollo on Parnassus came a voice commanding the two survivors to people the world anew with more
worthy inhabitants. ëhey were told to begin by casting behind them "the bones of their mother."
Deucalion shrewdly interpreted this strange oracle as referring to the stones, the bones of Mother
Earth. So as he and Pyrrha left the oracle, they tossed stones over their shoulders. All that Deucalion
threw took form as men, those of Pyrrha became women. She was slighter than Deucalion, and threw
smaller stones, so women have ever since been less of stature than men.

ëhe son of Deucalion was that Hellen from whom all the later Greeks claimed descent. Yet it is notable
that even in their legends they retain the traces of their divided race. On Hellen's family tree there is a
distinct place assigned for each Achaean hero. But the heroes of the older Aegean people are never
traced from Hellen. Each one is given independent origin as the child or grandchild of some god. ëhus
we have a fairly positive way for deciding of each hero in the stories that follow whether he was in truth
Achaean or whether the memory of him had been preserved from older non-Achaean days.͟

It is IMP‰RATIV‰, that we see past the stories and understand the reason, and truth. Again,
we see that the flood occurred, lives were spared to repopulate, and was destroyed for a
cleansing purpose.

 ike the ‰pic of Atrahasis, and the Jewish version in 1 ‰noch, 7, it starts with an
insurrection by lesser supernatural beings -Giants in this case- and an account of human
sin, which make Zeus/Jupiter decide to destroy the world.

The ties to Babylonian texts will account for most of the Greek and also the Roman accounts
of the flood itself.

Akkadian

‰pic of Gilgamesh, toward the end of the He who saw the deep version by Sin-liqe-unninni,
there are references to the great flood (tablet 11). The hero Gilgamesh, seeking
immortality, searches out Utnapishtim in Dilmun, a kind of paradise on earth. Utnapishtim
tells how ‰a (equivalent of the Sumerian ‰nki) warned him of the gods' plan to destroy all
life through a great flood and instructed him to build a vessel in which he could save his
family, his friends, and his wealth and cattle. After the Deluge the gods repented their
action and made Utnapishtim immortal.

Chinese

Shujing, or "Book of History", probably written around 500 BC‰ or earlier, states in the
opening chapters that ‰mperor Yao is facing the problem of flood waters that "reach to the
Heavens". This is the backdrop for the intervention of the famous Da Yu, who succeeded in
controlling the floods. He went on to found the first Chinese dynasty. The translator of the
1904 edition dated the Chinese deluge to 2348 BC‰, calculating that this was the same year
as the biblical flood. In fact, it is considered by many historians that the Mideast flood
legend (including the biblical flood) was erroneously linked to a flood mentioned in the
Sumerian king list, which was actually dated to 2900 BC‰

German

In Norse mythology, there are two separate deluges. According to the Prose ‰dda by Snorri
Sturluson, the first occurred at the dawn of time before the world was formed. Ymir, the
first giant, was killed by the god Odin and his brothers Vili and Ve, and when he fell, so
much blood flowed from his wounds that it drowned almost the entire race of giants with
the exception of the frost giant Bergelmir and his wife. They escaped in a ship and survived,
becoming the progenitors of a new race of giants. Ymir's body was then used to form the
earth while his blood became the sea

Menominee (American Indian)

In Menominee mythology, Manabus, the trickster, "fired by his lust for revenge" shot two
underground gods when the gods were at play. When they all dived into the water, a huge
flood arose. "The water rose up .... It knew very well where Manabus had gone." He runs,
he runs; but the water, coming from  ake Michigan, chases him faster and faster, even as
he runs up a mountain and climbs to the top of the lofty pine at its peak. Four times he
begs the tree to grow just a little more, and four times it obliges until it can grow no more.
But the water keeps climbing "up, up, right to his chin, and there it stopped": there was
nothing but water stretching out to the horizon. And then Manabus, helped by diving
animals, and especially the bravest of all, the Muskrat, creates the world as we know it
today.

Mi'kmaq (American Indian)

In Mi'kmaq mythology, evil and wickedness among men causes them to kill each other. This
causes great sorrow to the creator-sun-god, who weeps tears that become rains sufficient
to trigger a deluge. The people attempt to survive by traveling in bark canoes, but only a
single old man and woman survive to populate the earth.

Caddo (American Indian)

In Caddo mythology, four monsters grew in size and power until they touched the sky. At
that time, a man heard a voice telling him to plant a hollow reed. He did so, and the reed
grew very big very quickly. The man entered the reed with his wife and pairs of all good
animals. Waters rose, and covered everything but the top of the reed and the heads of the
monsters. A turtle then killed the monsters by digging under them and uprooting them. The
waters subsided, and winds dried the earth.

Incans (South American Indian)

In Inca mythology, Viracocha destroyed the giants with a Great Flood, and two people
repopulated the earth. Uniquely, they survived in sealed caves.

All around the world, the story differs to some degree ± yet holds strong to some common
rooting. But what about scientific proof of this? That part is actually fairly easy and has been
scientifically scoured already.

It was all the way back in 540 B.C. that a Greek philosopher named enophanes noted that
sometimes you can find seashells embedded in rocks high up on mountain tops. How is this
possible? The sea creatures who build the shells never leave the ocean, and even if they
were flung up on land, there¶s no way they¶d get up a mountain. What¶s going on here?
 enophanes proposed an answer which
was, in fact, correct, although no one
believed it until a couple thousand years
later. He said that maybe the mountains
had once been underwater.

Where is the last place you would expect to

find a seashell? Probably on the top of a
mountain right? Well, you can as scientists
have already done. Yet scientists formulate
up a barrage of reasons why these
seashells can be found high in the
mountains, because they do not want to attribute it to the ³God´ factor ± or the scriptures.
That was the way of the Indians, the natives, the uneducated of the world to declare
because they didn¶t understand the complexity of the sciences. Riiiight«..

There have been pictographs found in high caves, in some regions of North America which
depict the great flood pretty accurately. This would mean that the native Indians sought
shelter in these caves during the flood, and the only means they had to account for what
they were seeing, was through their art on the walls of these cave. It doesn¶t stop there,
archeology has uncovered many artifacts as well which also support this. Other
archaeological evidences prove the presence of Christian teaching in America many
centuries prior to the ³discovery´ of America by ‰uropeans. This, of course, is in perfect
harmony with the scriptural account of the Nephite Records (do some reading).

In the north-central state of Michigan, there have been thousands of ancient artifacts
unearthed which unmistakably depict scriptural events. [Similar objects have been
discovered in other Midwestern states, and as far south as  ouisiana.] Ancient slate tablets
found in Michigan are engraved with pictographs of Old-Testament events such as the
building of the Great Tower and the Flood of Noah. To me, this does not stretch the truth
thin, it supports what Genesis has already stated. If you understand that the tribes of the
earth were scattered to the four corners of the ‰arth, before the flood of Noah took place ±
this would not come as a surprise.

Now, lets get moving on to the ³reason´ behind God¶s wrath. In the book of Genesis we see
what has caused God to become so upset.

Genesis 6:1-12

When men began to multiply on the face of the ground, and daughters were born to them,
the sons of God saw that the daughters of men were fair; and they took to wife such of
them as they chose. Then the  ORD said, 'My spirit shall not abide in man forever, for he is
flesh, but his days shall be a hundred and twenty years.'
"The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, 
c
c
, when the sons of God
came in to the daughters of men, and they bore children to them. These were the mighty
men that were of old, the men of renown. The  ORD saw that the wickedness of man was
great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil
continually. And the  ORD was sorry that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him
to his heart. So the  ORD said, 'I will blot out man whom I have created from the face of
the ground, man and beast and creeping things and birds of the air, for I am sorry that I
have made them.'

"But Noah found favor [grace] in the eyes of the  ORD. These are the generations of Noah.
Noah was a righteous man, blameless in his generation; Noah walked with God. And Noah
had three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth.

"Now the earth was [thoroughly] corrupt in God's sight, and the earth was filled
[continually] with violence. And God saw the earth, and behold, it was corrupt; for all flesh
had corrupted their way upon the earth."

It is obvious the term ³Sons of God (angels) came in to the daughters of men (women), and
they bore children to them.´ Their offspring called ³The Nephilim´, the mighty men that
were of old, the men of renown is also quite evident to its meaning ± the Giants.

There were offspring which did survive the flood, or the intermixing did not completely come
to an end, found with giants such as Goliath or Og, King of Bashan. (Numbers. 13:33, 1
Sam. 17). Deuteronomy 18:10 describes Og's bedstead, "...behold, his bedstead was a
bedstead of iron; is it not in Rabbah of the Ammonites? Nine cubits (13.5 feet) was its
length, and four cubits (6 feet) its breadth, according to the common cubit."

Coming to terms with exactly the size and strength of Goliath (and possibly other
giants/nephilim), we can find a generous amount of information in the bible.

David's slaying of the giant Goliath is recorded in 1 Samuel 17 where we learn how big he
was, "And there came out from the camp of the Philistines a champion named Goliath, of
Gath, whose height was six cubits and a span (9.5 - 10.8 ft or more). He had a helmet of
bronze on his head, and he was armed with a coat of mail, and the weight of the coat was
five thousand shekels (~125 pounds) of bronze. And he had greaves of bronze upon his
legs, and a javelin of bronze slung between his shoulders. And the shaft of his spear was
like a weaver's beam, and his spear's head weighed six hundred shekels (~15 pounds) of
iron; and his shield-bearer went before him." 2 Samuel 21:18-22 records the following
glimpse of the giants still living in Israel in the time of King David, "After this there was
again war with the Philistines at Gob; then Sibbecai the Hushathite slew Saph, who was one
of the descendants of the giants. And there was again war with the Philistines at Gob; and
‰lhanan the son of Jaareoregim, the Bethlehemite, slew Goliath the Gittite, the shaft of
whose spear was like a weaver's beam. And there was again war at Gath, where there was
a man of great stature, who had six fingers on each hand, and six toes on each foot,
twenty-four in number; and he also was descended from the giants. And when he taunted
Israel, Jonathan the son of Shimei, David's brother, slew him. These four were descended
from the giants in Gath; and they fell by the hand of David and by the hand of his
servants."

These are human like beings, only huge and strong ± and a bit unusual in appearance even
outside of their size. What about Giants existing now? According to scientists, because we
do not have a live specimen or a freshly dead one to study, the answer is a resounding no
across the scientific community. However, there are many believers of Sasquatch, Yeti, or
³Bigfoot´ creatures ± yet only A small minority of accredited scientists profess the view that
evidence collected of alleged Bigfoot encounters warrants further evaluation and testing.

While most casts have five toes²like all known apes²some casts of alleged Bigfoot tracks
have had numbers ranging from two to six. It is interesting to note, that with six toes it
matches one of the bible¶s references to the Nephilim/Giants, as with Og, King of Bashan.

The Native Americans, before any settlers arrived, were already well aware of these
³bigfoot´ beings, and even went on to warn the ‰uropean invaders of the existence of these
creatures in the forests.  ittle to no attention was made to the superstitious beliefs of an
uncultured and uncivilized race, such as the Indians.

The Tule River Indian Reservation was established in 1873 on 54,116 acres. The reservation
lands are heavily timbered and include several Giant Sequoia Groves. The reservation is
surrounded by thousands of acres of national forest system lands. It is rare for an Indian
tribe to own a site they believe they were created at, and records seem to imply that the
location of the reservation was chosen to incorporate Painted Rock for that reason.

Painted Rock is first described by Mallery in 1889. Mallery (1889) stated that the paintings
were "famous and well-known in the area." He described the paintings as created by being
pecked, painted, and then pecked again to ensure a "long lasting effect." Mallery also
described the Coyote ‰ating the Moon, and a large bear-like creature covering one wall. He
stated that the locals called the creature, "Hairy Man." Steward noted the paintings in 1929,
and stated that a Tribal elder, living at the location in 1900, had identified the large painting
as the "Hairy Man."

There are stories originating from the Sitecah from the Paiute Indians (Nevada). They told
of red-haired men and women of light colored skin as tall as 12 feet who originally lived in
the area when the Paiutes had first arrived. ‰vidently these human giants liked to eat the
Indians so they had problems making friends. The Indian tribes of the area finally joined
and ambushed the giants killing most of them on the spot. The remaining giants took refuge
in a cave. The Indians demanded they come out and fight but the giants refused. So, the
Indians piled brush into the cave and set it on fire. Any giants that did run out were shot
with arrows, the remaining giants were asphyxiated.

In the 1800s this cave was known as Horse Shoe Cave but is now called  ovelock Cave.
 ovelock cave is located around 20 miles South of  ovelock Nevada.

In 1911 bat guano harvesters started working

in this same cave. After digging out four feet of
guano they found many broken arrows that the
Indians had fired into the cave as well as other
interesting artifacts, and yes, they found red-
haired giants. ‰ven in the shrunken mummified
condition the skeletons ranged in height from 8
feet to just under 12 feet. I will leave it up to
you to decide on the heights based on the
photo of one of the cave giant¶s jaw bone and
dental cast of a regular man¶s teeth. Most of
the artifacts have been lost over time due to
lack of interest from science. Go figure.
However some of the artifacts are in the
Humboldt Museum at Winnemucca Nevada and
in the Nevada State Historical Society¶s
museum at Reno.

The Review-Miner June 19, 1931 Reported the find of two giant skeletons in the Humboldt
lake bed. Both skeletons were wrapped in a gum treated fabric. The first skeleton was 8 and
one half feet tall, the second was just under 10 feet tall.

Out of all the reported cases, across the world - no one has seemed to make the biblical
connection to the scriptural Giants. Why? To get a better view of where the stories will take
you in connection to ³Bigfoot´ ± take a look at this listing. Bigfoot is known as many names
depending on the part of the world or culture you are looking at.

°
 ± Mongolia, °  ± Philippines,   - Afghanistan and Pakistan ,
 - Vietnam , 
  ± Siberia, c
 ± Scotland,  ± Japan,
 c
 - South America ,  c ± Malaysia,  c
 ± Indonesia,
 - China ,  ± Tibet,  - Australia
So how can so many cultures and locations around the world be incorrect? The answer is,
they cannot. While most folk-lore is extremely isolated to a small surrounding area ± the
story of giants stretch around the world. Almost every major ancient religion has giants
identified in their teachings. One of the biggest argument and debate over the ³Bigfoot´
view, is the lack of bodies ± if we honestly take into consideration that these beings are
indeed a cross between humans and angels ± who is to say what their abilities are, or what
their lifespan is. Humans are, as the bible suggests ± made up of the dusts of the earth on a
physical sense ± imagine taking a celestial being, and intermingling it with something
comprised of terrestrial material. You would have a ³Perseus´ effect (clash of the titans).
Not only would you have that, but if you take into consideration that angels are considered
being eternal (until God destroys those which are still unruly in the end) , it¶s possible that
these Giants do not have a lifespan anywhere comparable.

Is this absurd? According to the bible, many notable figures in the Old Testament lived very
long lives. But what about the science behind it. Well, lets take a look at some of the
species currently living on earth today. Starting with plants ± there is no lifespan of a tree,
it can be thousands, possibly even hundreds of thousands of years old ± as long as the
conditions which have sustained it do not change through man¶s conquest and destruction.

How about animal life? Well according to scientists the Hydrozoan species Turritopsis
nutricula is capable of cycling from a mature adult stage to an immature polyp stage and
back again. This means that there may be no natural limit to its life span. However, no
single specimen has been observed for any extended period, and it is impossible to estimate
the age of a specimen.

The Antarctic sponge Cinachyra antarctica has an extremely slow growth rate in the low
temperatures of the Southern Ocean. One specimen has been estimated to be 1,550 years
old.

A specimen of the Icelandic Cyprine Arctica islandica (also known as an ocean quahog), a
mollusk, was found to have lived 405 years and possibly up to 410. Another specimen had a
recorded life span of 374 years.

Some koi fish have reportedly lived more than 200 years, the oldest being Hanako, died at
an age of 226 years on July 7, 1977

So is the thought of a part human part angelic hybrid surviving a great and many years that
absurd, when our own sciences can prove creatures that are alive today can do so in a
natural state?

Perhaps the way we associate things to one another needs to change. Perhaps the
Bigfoot/Giants/Nephilim are in more abundant numbers than we know, and we seldom see
them because they have abilities which give them the power to remain hidden from sight or
to transform into another creature and/or being ± we know that angels possess these sort
of powers.
Y

 
O
  


  
 

For so long, man has illustrated angels as

those chubby little babies with wings,
beautifully magnificent male and female forms
± perfect from any blemish or stain. They are
almost always portrayed with wings such as
those of eagles or doves ± with human like
demeanor, bodies, and faces.

Scripture does not say it, nor does scripture

support the idea. While I am sure that the
angels feel honored seeing that we accept
their identities to closely resemble that of
mankind, and in a sense make them home
amongst us ± we fail to see the biblical
definition and also fail to recognize their
extremely different appearances. In my book
³Opening the Doorway´, I outlined some of
the characteristics of angels listed in the bible,
but only scratched the surface of what
scripture contains. Angels appear in both the
Old and New Testaments, most of the ancient
detail we have about angels is NOT biblical at
least from what was considered as the accepted books of the canon, but instead comes from
the apocrypha (books written before 100 BC that were rejected from inclusion in the Old
Testament) and the pseudepigrapha (books written from 200 BC to 100 AD that were never
considered for inclusion in the canonical Bible). This is not material that was considered
³acceptable´ by the general assemblies, and by those which feel that the canon (Holy Bible
of today) contains all accurate accounts of what should be considered while all other
knowledge outside of these canonical books should not. Without going into the apocrypha or
pseudepigrapha materials, here is what we can see:

Daniel saw an angel with arms and legs resembling polished metal and precious stones, and
a face like lightning (Daniel 10:5-6). The angel that rolled back the stone from Christ's tomb
was radiating dazzling light (Matthew 28:3;  uke 24:4). The book of Revelation describes
some highly unusual beings who may be a variety of angel in Revelation 4:6-8.

When people in the Bible saw an angel, their typical response was to fall on their faces in
fear and awe. Some Bible passages picture angels with wings (Isaiah 6:2,6). Other verses
talk about angels flying, and we assume that the wings would be useful for that flight
(Daniel 9:21). Most references to angels in the Bible say nothing about wings, and in
passages like Genesis 18-19, it is certain that no wings were visible. The most important
things to consider is how the bible described them, and if we take these things into account
here is what we come up with:

Polished metal , precious stones, face like lightning, radiating light, unusual, flying (in the
skies/in the air) , some with several faces, some with many wings, some described with
animalistic qualities (appearance of an eagle, appearance of an ox)

Now ± given the descriptions of these beings we could conclude many different thoughts
about the visual experience that the author bared witness to. We have to take a great deal
of consideration that the authors of the books in the bible were not exposed to the
technological advances of our day ± so if let¶s say they saw an airplane in the sky ± they
would have associated it to a growling or hissing giant monster bird which left smoke and
fire in its wake, or some other description based on the knowledge that they possessed at
the time. It is possibility that the writers of the bible were in fact seeing what we now call
³UFOs´ or ³Alien Craft´. According to the definitions which we have from the authors, it is a
very distinct possibility.

If you look at these pictures, you have the eyes all about them, before and behind ± you
also have the lightning, the polished metal, precious stones (multi-colored lights) radiating
light, they are very unusual, and they have sort of wings ± also flying. Depending on the
ship and it¶s design you could also start seeing how they could be described as eagles, oxen
(horns, tail), and the like. We need to consider that just because the scientific community
would state that these beings could not be ³of our world´, does not make them right. The
extremely interesting fact about when these craft truly started becoming more and more
active ± was after the development of our nuclear capabilities, and after the detonation of
these weapons in tests. These nuclear tests and experiments could not be seen from distant
alien races in faraway places of the universe, that thought is absurd. Instead I believe that
it indicated that we (and they also would be effected if they are inhabitants), were on the
doorstep of complete and utter annihilation. The greatest of ³alien´ activities have always
seemed to be in close proximity to major nuclear or technologically advanced installations,
not just in the United States ± but all across the globe.

In fact Hitler, and the Nazis were extremely

obsessed with these UFOs that they were in the
process of developing ships with these
characteristics.  ater, the United States did in
fact manufacture several hover like vehicles such
as the ones the Germans were designing ± but
were unable to create anything close to what we
hear reports of. The picture to the right is one
such creation called the ³Avro´ saucer, and was
almost an exact duplicate of the Nazi schematics
captured during the war.

The one that you see in this photograph is more of

a gliding craft than it is anything else. The
dynamics of this vehicle was the start of stealth
based technology, and silent vehicle systems, not
one based on engine technology, but rather using
the aerodynamics of the design to skip across the
air like a smooth rock skipping across the water.

‰ven more interesting angels are also referenced as stars many times in the bible ± which
to me suggests how their appearance could possibly resemble ³stars´ in the sky.

Here are just a few references to angels being called ³stars´ in the bible:

Isaiah 14:12
How you have fallen from heaven, O morning star, son of the dawn!
Job 38:7
7 When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?

Revelation 1:17-20
17 And when I saw him, I fell at his feet as dead. And he laid his right hand upon me,
saying unto me, Fear not; I am the first and the last: 18 I am he that liveth, and was dead;
and, behold, I am alive for evermore, Amen; and have the keys of hell and of death. 19
Write the things which thou hast seen, and the things which are, and the things which shall
be hereafter; 20 The mystery of the seven stars which thou sawest in my right hand, and
the seven golden candlesticks. The seven stars are the angels of the seven churches: and
the seven candlesticks which thou sawest are the seven churches

Revelation 12:3-4
3 And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having
seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads. 4 And his tail drew the third
part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the
woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born.

From a biblical perspective, our identification to angels is quite the contrary to what is
written and if you take what into consideration of visions and distinct definitions of the
biblical description of angels, you can get an extremely wild picture in your mind:

Isaiah 6:2 describes angels with six wings, each pair having its own function--two to cover
his face, two to cover his feet and two to fly. ‰zekiel has a vision of angels with six wings
and multiple faces, and also of angels as fiery wheels, or thrones, with many eyes.

The variety of descriptions led scholars and theologians to conclude that there were several
kinds of angels. After all, a huge creature with six wings and four faces would not be
mistaken for a human by anyone, let alone Abraham.

In truth, the reality to angels may very well be the reality of God ± as God has spoken
through animals, bushes, and a column of fire ± Angels could very well take on a similar
shape or form to provide their messages in times of need or command, to the receiver of
this message, and have an appealing appearance so that their message isn¶t mistaken to be
by a monster (by our ³civilized minds´). Satan has appeared in the form of a serpent, and
also a great dragon with many heads and horns ± so if Satan can have multiple
appearances, why not the rest of the angelic order? True that many of the representations
of words in the biblical texts could very well be teaching parables and not necessarily the
actual physical appearances, but it does use serpent (in beast reference) several times in
the bible to identify Satan.

If you also take into account that life itself has such a wide and extremely diverse
appearance ± it should be abundantly obvious that God truly appreciates diversity in His
creation, so one should not be surprised at all to see this same diversity in the creation of
the angels. I have a personal feeling that since mankind was created in the image of God,
would it not be fitting that the other creatures be created in the image of something? Who is
to say that something is not the angelic order? And if so ± perhaps we should all start
rethinking just what angels truly look like instead of pretending that angels have the body
of Adonis and the face of Michael  andon from  ittle House on the Prairie.

Demons (commonly referred to as ³Fallen Angels´ or some other entity) are always
portrayed as the ugly, grotesque, hideous, warped and disfigured beings seen in movies,
drawings, paintings, and imaginations.c

But how much of this is true, and how much of it is constructed in the minds of the
imaginative? In truth , there is nothing which identifies the beings seen here to a demon or
an angel with the exception of our opinions, they could be either considering one looks
somewhat like a bear, and the other somewhat like a bat ± could we legitimately determine
if these beings are good or bad just by appearance alone? If your answer is yes, then how
different are you to that of a bat, or a bear? Are they evil beings just because they do not
share the appearance of what you would consider to being wholesome or that they don¶t
have similar appearances to your own self? The mind plays tricks with people, and things
are not always what they appear to be. We are the ones that are notorious for labeling
things good or bad, even if they are not.

Some have phobias ± such as people with arachnophobia, which see spiders as truly evil
and frightening creatures. Some see them as beautiful, and some are amazed and keep
them as family pets. Whichever is the case, the answer is a personal one ± not necessarily
the right or true one. And while the one which sees them as beautiful is the most passive
and has the greatest concern for the spider¶s best interests and well being ± they all fail to
one of the greatest acknowledgements which need to come about ± and that they are part
of God¶s created ± no matter the species, or even the planet they came from, for that
matter. If He felt the need and importance for them to be here, then that is all which truly
matters.

Many people do not understand what the word ³demon´ is, its proper definition, or where it
originated from.

Daemon (Greek for "soul"), is the source for the ‰nglish word demon. It was a complex
term that could refer to more than one type of spirit entity, and ultimately came to be
associated with invisible spirits (both good and evil) that occupied the ethereal spaces
between God and humanity. These were beings that flew between the world and the sky,
the lower and the upper regions, connecting what was above with what was below, acting
as sort of guardian angels.

The term ³demon´ was never used in the Old Testament, or the New Testament ± and is
used improperly in current times.

The Greek notion of daemons as personal familiar spirits was originally derived from similar
notions widespread throughout the Near ‰ast²from Greeks to Babylonians, from ‰gyptians
to Persians. Sometimes one central spirit became the leading principle, and was called the
archetype of the Anthropos²the Self in human form, often experienced as an inner guide.
The daemon of Socrates, described by Plato as Socrates' good spirit, is the most familiar
example of these entities. This spirit manifested as a figure or a voice, which forbade the
philosopher from doing certain things and encouraged him to undertake others. A later
variation of this basic idea is that of a guardian spirit who mediates between the spirit world
and man, bringing dreams and foretelling the future.

Another context in which the daemon is mentioned in the early Platonic dialogues is in
connection with love--‰ros. According to Socrates, ‰ros is not the beautiful beloved, but is,
rather, the spirit who inspires the lover, giving the lover his divine madness. ‰ros is neither
mortal nor immortal, but the spirit who interprets and conveys messages back and forth
between men and gods. He is described as a "great spirit daemon²and like all spirits a
being intermediate between the divine and the mortal."

The role of daemons was of considerable importance in Plutarch's universe. They were
regarded as a crucial intermediary between the gods and humanity, intervening in the
affairs of human life in ways that would be unworthy of more exalted beings. In the De
defectu oraculorum, Plutarch's chief concern is the way daemons administer the oracles,
although he also considers them in the much wider context of mythology in general. Some
daemons are evil, and Plutarch's belief in them is the basis behind the story of Typhon and
the other giants in mythology²the fallen daemons confined in bodies as a punishment.
The ancient Jewish philosopher Philo said that air was the region inhabited by incorporeal
souls, which the philosophers call daemons, but which the Scriptures more appropriately call
angels. When the Hebrew Scriptures were being translated from Hebrew to Greek, the
translators apparently considered using the word daemon to translate the Hebrew malakh
(angel, a word literally meaning "messenger"). However, because of the complexity and
moral ambivalence of the Greek term, the translators chose angelos, Greek for
"messenger." 4
 
 
  

Y
    ! "

þ
 
 

  




 

 
 

  
        
 
   
  

    

!   
 "      # 
  
!
! 

!   

 $ 


%
& ' 
(
     
 
 
 
)
    *+  
)

mor the blind that walk upon this earth this chapter may be
extremely hard to understand, but one must remember the
verses above, it is imperative to understand the design
without losing one͛s place here ʹ we have to walk through
the design, but not necessarily be a part of it.

mrom the dawning of time, since our walk upon the dust and clay of this earth, angels have been
here among us, but none as bold or blunt to his position and power as Lucifer. Lucifer has
tempted man(kind) throughout every stage ʹ from the Garden of Eden, to the temptation of God
through Job, to the temptation of Jesus in the desert, to the possession of Judas, to present day
spiritual destruction, discord, and lies. Lucifer has been trying to find any way to make man(kind)
turn away from God͛s works, His words, His teachings, even the acknowledgement of His creation
and the fact that everything is truly God͛s to begin with. Lucifer has jumped a claim to something
that was never his to begin with, and the beginnings of this started far before man created the
first wheel.

During this time ʹ Lucifer and those which followed him have been building and constructing the
design that we see today, one layer at a time and one brick at a time. Great engineering feats and
government systems have been put into place ʹ not to serve God, but to serve Lucifer͛s ultimate
goals and plans for the future. ëhese plans have been slowly evolving and surfacing over time,
with historical proof of failed attempts to bring forth his ultimate engine against the Kingdom of
God. Examples of the failed attempts can be seen in Roman history, German History, mrench
History, Indian/Persian History, etc. etc. ʹ where each have had the opportunity to sit at a great
seat of military power trying to encapsulate the rest of the world through dominance and
consumed by war ʹ but failed, because it was not the proper time (God͛s).

None have been as successful than that of the United States ʹ it is here we have a stable position
of rule and domination through the design and implementation it has on us. ëhe United States is
not based on a radical new political architecture, but rather an architecture which worked for
thousands and thousands of years ʹ that of Egypt.

ë 
   stretched from roughly 3150 BCE to 30 BCE, making it the longest lived at 3130
years.

ëhe pharaoh (president) was the absolute monarch of the country and, at least in theory, wielded
complete control of the land and its resources. ëhe king (Pentagon) was the supreme military
commander and head of the government, who relied on a bureaucracy of officials(underlings:
lieutenants, corporals, etc) to manage his affairs. In charge of the administration was his second in
command, the vizier (congress), who acted as the king's representative and coordinated land surveys,
the treasury, building projects, the legal system, and the archives. At a regional level, the country was
divided into as many as administrative regions called nomes each governed by a nomarch (senators),
who was accountable to the vizier for his jurisdiction. ëhe temples (US Administration Offices) formed
the backbone of the economy. Not only were they houses of worship, but were also responsible for
collecting and storing the nation's wealth in a system of granaries and treasuries administered by
overseers (IRS), who redistributed grain and goods.

Much of the economy was centrally organized and strictly controlled. Although the ancient Egyptians did
not use coinage until the Late period, they did use a type of money-barter system, with standard sacks
of grain and the deben, a weight of roughly 91 grams (3 oz) of copper or silver, forming a common
denominator. Workers were paid in grain; a simple laborer might earn 5½ sacks (200 kg or 400 lb) of
grain per month, while a foreman might earn 7½ sacks (250 kg or 550 lb). Prices were fixed across the
country and recorded in lists to facilitate trading; for example a shirt cost five copper deben, while a cow
cost 140 deben. Grain could be traded for other goods, according to the fixed price list. During the 5th
century BC coined money was introduced into Egypt from abroad. At first the coins were used as
standardized pieces of precious metal rather than true money, but in the following centuries
international traders came to rely on coinage.

In truth we are a mirror of an Egyptian system of government ʹ which might explain why the pyramid
can be found on our basic dollar monetary system. One only needs to change a few elements, to have
the original United States design in whole. If we look at the system now, not just in the United States ʹ
but in any country͛s design ʹ the obvious goal Lucifer has for us (in design) becomes obvious,
subservient and ignorant people following the masses and the government design right into oblivion ʹ
losing all sense of individualism, true freedom, or independent thought.

As we become more and more reliant on the governments, we lose more and more of the
fundamental elements which make us free. If we look at all the branches of administration and
organizational power the government has out there ʹ we can follow it all the way down to the
very ground we walk on. People still cling to the sense that they own something of value, how
valuable is it when it can be seized at any moment, for any reason? All the government would
have to do is mandate and enforce it ʹ and it would be so, failing to accept this mandate now
makes you a criminal of local, state, and government levels.. Now what?

Coming to terms with this fact, makes you all the more wise and you should hearken these words.
It very well can happen, at any time, for any reason ʹ as deemed ͞necessary͟.

A good example of this is Waco, ë . ʹ now, there are many controversies surrounding what
happened at Waco ʹ I will round up the most important into a nutshell and you should think
about it. ëhe Waco tragedy did not have to happen at all ʹ why did it happen? David Koresh was a
free thinker and his compound was a place where the community could leave the normal grips of
society and attempt to redesign a new one. ëhe media had a circus pointing to those living in the
compound as cultists and the local governments didn͛t like the idea of having someone trying to
keep the sense of independence and freedom true to its word.

During the standoff, not one shot was fired by the branch-dividians, until the Aëm and other
alphabet gangs started shooting into the compound killing and wounding people inside. ëhe
government agencies drew first blood, and like the movie ͞Rambo͟ ʹ it became a point of survival
and instinct, not rational thinking.

ëhe government order was to secure the compound because of the notion that Koresh had illegal
and dangerous arms in that compound. If one wants to really do some digging ʹ you can see that
Koresh did have an arms operation at the compound ʹ but it was to buy and sell for profit to
provide funding to the compound and its inhabitants, just like any other business operation, and
weapons trade in ë and abroad is not uncommon at all, nor is it ͞illegal͟.

ëhe agencies raided the compound, and all the while through the entire parade of force seen in
the media clips ʹ not one ͞illegal weapon͟ such as the claims of them having grenades, and
military grade weapons such as rocket launchers, mortars, cannons, C4, cyanide gas, etc.. were
ever used. If I were under siege, I would be using my most heavy weapons to try and secure a
means of escape for myself and the others around me. Koresh didn͛t use them, because he didn͛t
have them.

Do you really believe you are free still?

ëhe governments know that they control everything ʹ just as Chapter 3 outlined in my book , we
are now the Indians and we are living on the government reserves, not our own land. Land
ownership ALWAYS defaults back to the government, if you don͛t believe me read on.

Private Land Ownership

ͻLands not held by any other governmental agency are in private ownership. Private land use is
regulated by state laws and codes established by cities and counties. ëhese are the only three
agencies allowed to regulate the use of land. ëhe most common local land use regulation is the
zoning or land development code. No private land can be used or developed without zoning
compliance. Private land owners pay property taxes based on each state's own laws.

Property Rights

ͻëhe right to use property is given by a city or county when its zoning code lists land uses
permitted in the various zoning districts. If a land use is permitted, no one can deny a land owner
the right to develop that use on privately owned property. ëhe jurisdiction may regulate where
the use is placed, how far back from property lines and design features such as height or
architecture, but it cannot refuse the right of a property owner to use the land in accordance with
the zone's regulations. Sometimes zones list uses that can be approved with the discretion of the
local government. Property owners must apply for approval to develop these land uses. Called
"Conditional" or "Special" Use Permits, cities and counties have the ability to approve or deny
such requests. ëhis type of use is called a "property privilege" because of the requirement for
permit approval.

We are still regulated by local, state, and federal agencies ʹ even if we ͞own͟ it. It gets much
deeper than that ʹ read our constitution:

ëhe 5th Amendment's Eminent Domain Clause says that the government cannot take away
anyone's private property for public use without giving them just compensation in return. ëhis
clause is also known as the "ëakings" Clause, because the government can "take" the property.
ëhe 5th Amendment Eminent Domain Clause in the American Bill of Rights reads like this:

"...nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."

ëhey can, at any time, invoke this law. But when it comes to ͞special circumstances͟, such as for
the interests of ͞National Security͟, wartime efforts, or under martial law, the government needs
no reason ʹ no explanation, nor any excuse. ëhey can and will come in, seize your land, seize your
property, and kick you to the curb. ëhere are laws in place which entitle them to everything you
own, to be seized and used not at their expense, at yours. ëhere are civil out-reach programs that
can be found by searching the internet which proves it can, and does happen.
ëhe power of the government should not be taken lightly, while the majority of the people in the
world feel that the government is in place to ͞protect and serve͟ the nation, there are free
thinkers out there that see it is to maintain a constant grip of control, and to promote
uncertainties which leave us subservient to its design.

Now that we have went through the physical world pattern of things, it͛s time to talk about the
spiritual design. Everything you see, how all the governments and administrations operate, are in
tandem with one another. ëhe structure of the government systems are a spider web design, not
just in the United States, but all of the governments of the world are slowly drawing towards it͛s
center. Why? All the governments of the world are bankrupt (except for a few) ʹ they are
collapsing on themselves because the monetary system currently in place just does not work
anymore.

ëhe governments when united in the effort to quickly introduce a new way and system, must be
͞Globally͟ aligned. We are doing so by the global and economic efforts of our leaders. While all of
this will appear as a great time in world history because jobs and the economies will flourish and
everyone seems to have everything they could ever want or need, when it truly does start
occurring, I can guarantee you that which sits in the middle of the elaborate web-work, will be
the antichrist.
ëhe obstacles that are still in the way are quickly being removed from our nation... Namely our
Constitution - civil liberties - and freedoms on which our nation was founded. In order for this
Global Socialist system to be successful here in America the powers that control our corrupt
politicians must convert our nation from a Republic to a Socialistic government much the same
way as they did the nations of Europe (now the European Union).

ëhe media has been a very major part of their propaganda by repeating to us over and over that
the United States of America is a democracy knowing that hearing it enough we would accept it.
Democracy is a majority rules type government with No restrictions other that just that "ëhe
Majority Rules" while a Republic is a system of laws protecting it's core foundation. ëhe mounding
mathers who wrote the Constitution gave us a Republic. ëhey believed democracies were
dangerous and unworkable and they were correct.

ëhe media will be used in many ways in the day's to come. ëhey feed us the Agenda's that are to
be implemented upon us. ëhere are no main stream media's that have not been corrupted and
bought off. ëhey are all locked into the global propaganda system. How many times have you
heard the word "Global" in your media? It is no coincidence but rather a premeditated
propaganda campaign intended to program your way of thinking about America on a Global level.

Global Community - Global Village - Global Citizenship - Global Planners (United Nations) - Global
ID - Global ëax - World Monetary System - World Court (International Court of Justice) - Global
Military and Policing tools - Global Warming - Global ëerrorism - Global Disasters - Global
Spirituality - Global Religion (Interfaithism). Global governance (Government) is being forced
upon us at every turn. Like sheep being lead into the corral we are being led into the database of
the antichrist system.

ëhe spider web is being built around us right now. ëhe National ID is designed to be the main
system to pull in the masses. It's the point of the spear designed to pierce our liberties and
freedom and take them down but it is only the point of the spear. While we fight against it they
are encircling us with the web of government intervention designed to bring in the rest of the
populous.

ëhe antichrist, the beast, the false prophet ʹ they are all seen as a person, living people.. I have
never really felt that way, because the result of angel͛s copulation with humans result in
Nephalim or giants such as Goliath, I truly feel it͛s a system. ëhe false prophet , the system of
belief ʹ the antichrist, the systems which oppose Christ, the beast, the engine or system which
drives it all and keeps it all together.

Angels have never, nor will ever possess ͞flesh and bone͟ ʹ and while there is still a possibility of
a great dark tyrant coming into being, being led by Lucifer himself which through his
extraordinary powers, blinds everyone except the believers in Christ, I just don͛t believe it to be
an actual physical man ʹ but rather a system put into place and effect by mankind.
ëhe term antichrist ʹ means anything which opposes or is opposite of Christ, it does not
necessarily mean a man.

ëhe term false prophet ʹ means anything which teaches false doctrines, falsity in prophecy of the
Bible, falsehood in religion.

ëhe beast ʹ the word itself comes from the Middle English beste, from Old mrench, from Latin
bestia, but the proper English definition of this is ͞A brutal, contemptible person.͟, which in truth
could also be summarized into a system designed by someone of that nature.

We are living in dark days, because while our country has always had its own personal problems ʹ
we are no longer talking about just our country - we are now talking a ͞Global͟ scale of problems
throughout the ͞kingdoms͟ of the earth. Everything you see out there in the world of power,
politics, and control ʹ are from the direct design of the fallen ones. It works for him, because it
was laid out by him. As I pointed out at the beginning of this chapter, Lucifer(Satan) said it all to
Jesus in Luke 4:5-7 ʹ He ͞owns͟ the ͞power͟ and ͞glory͟ of the kingdoms of the world. And went
on to say ͞for that is delivered unto me; and to whomsoever I will I give it͟.

What Lucifer foolishly does not see, is that he owns nothing but dust and dirt ʹ the bible also says
this, in Genesis.

mirst and foremost, before I point out the serpent in Genesis and what the scripture says, you
have to understand the word serpent. ëhe word serpent in the American English dictionary means
a snake, or snake like creature ʹ and this is how we portray Lucifer in many pictures and portraits
of the Garden of Eden. But in truth, ëhe Hebrew word rendered "serpent" in Gen. 3 is Nachash
(from the root Nachash, to shine), and means a shining one. Again, we are misled by words and
have missed the real definition.

Genesis 3:14

14 And the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou
 cursed above all
cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the
days of thy life:

Lucifer has nothing but dust ʹ can make no claims to anything except the physical adobes which
man builds out of the dust, clay, dirt ʹ and call it his kingdoms.

Consequentially however, we have to live in this world and suffer at the hands of its designer
(aside from God͛s intervention). And this is where we need to especially come to acknowledge
that we must, for our own sakes ʹ step out of the world, just as Christ wanted us to ʹ for this very
reason.
In a nutshell, what Christ wants us to truly learn in this life, here upon this earth ʹ can be found
summarized in John 15.

John 15:1-17

1I am the true vine, and my mather is the husbandman. 2Every branch in me that beareth not fruit
he taketh away: and every branch that beareth fruit, he purgeth it, that it may bring forth more
fruit. 3Now ye are clean through the word which I have spoken unto you. 4Abide in me, and I in
you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, except it abide in the vine; no more can ye, except
ye abide in me. 5I am the vine, ye are the branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same
bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing. 6If a man abide not in me, he is cast
forth as a branch, and is withered; and men gather them, and cast them into the fire, and they are
burned. 7If ye abide in me, and my words abide in you, ye shall ask what ye will, and it shall be
done unto you. 8Herein is my mather glorified, that ye bear much fruit; so shall ye be my disciples.
9As the mather hath loved me, so have I loved you: continue ye in my love. 10If ye keep my
commandments, ye shall abide in my love; even as I have kept my mather's commandments, and
abide in his love. 11ëhese things have I spoken unto you, that my joy might remain in you, and
that your joy might be full.

12ëhis is my commandment, ëhat ye love one another, as I have loved you. 13Greater love hath
no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends. 14Ye are my friends, if ye do
whatsoever I command you. 15Henceforth I call you not servants; for the servant knoweth not
what his lord doeth: but I have called you friends; for all things that I have heard of my mather I
have made known unto you. 16Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you, and ordained you,
that ye should go and bring forth fruit, and that your fruit should remain: that whatsoever ye shall
ask of the mather in my name, he may give it you. 17ëhese things I command you, that ye love one
another.

18If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before it hated you. 19If ye were of the world,
the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of
the world, therefore the world hateth you. 20Remember the word that I said unto you, ëhe
servant is not greater than his lord. If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you; if
they have kept my saying, they will keep yours also. 21But all these things will they do unto you
for my name's sake, because they know not him that sent me. 22If I had not come and spoken
unto them, they had not had sin: but now they have no cloke for their sin. 23He that hateth me
hateth my mather also. 24If I had not done among them the works which none other man did,
they had not had sin: but now have they both seen and hated both me and my mather. 25But this
cometh to pass, that the word might be fulfilled that is written in their law, ëhey hated me
without a cause.

John 15:18-19 says it as plainly as it gets, true Christians are not to be of the world / we are not
part of it. ëhe reason is simple, the world is that which embraces the design, and embraces its
designer.
Y
#"
$%& 


[   



   
 





When we look at good and evil, light

and dark ʹ we generally will look
outside of ourselves to reference it or
represent it. We usually see our own
self as being in the middle, or on the
better side of the spectrum ʹ much
like the way that a convict in prison is
always innocent of the crimes they
committed. It is not in human nature
to lie, that is a choice which is made
and not everyone lies or feels right
about lying to others ʹ what is human
nature is the denial of facing
ourselves for what we really are and
truly do. In the seat of the soul we
are not bound by either side ʹ but
many times bind our own selves with false truths, some of which we end up becoming our own worst
enemy. Many also believe that we are trapped in a tug of war between right and wrong ʹ and while the
feeling may be there, there is no actual tug of war because neither side has the ability to pull you, push
you, or make you do anything.

God, ëhe mather made sure of this by creating a free gift to everyone, called free will ʹ which sets the
spiritual boundaries of man, spirit, angels, and Himself. ëhe old phrase ͞You can kill me, but you can͛t
keep me͟ is the truth and is the understanding we must adhere to. If the worst possible thing that could
happen to me was to physically die in any given situation, instead of having to reject what I believe,
what I have come to know, and who I am spiritually ʹ I would accept it without question. ëhere are
things much worse than death that we can face toward spiritual completeness. Scripture indicates to
live is to die, not on a literal sense ʹ but to watch our former self pass away.

ëhere are even people in this world that believe they can create a covenant with Satan, a pact or
agreement in exchange for their souls. You see it in movies, you hear it in music, you can read about it in
the manifesto of some covens practicing witchcraft and magick, you hear about it even from some
religious ministries. ëhis is another one of those manmade misconceptions illustrated in tales and
folklore, one cannot trade something which is not rightfully theirs to begin with ʹ and in scripture, in the
end ʹ you see that Satan sits alone in his judgment. ëhe bible does not say that spirits owned by Satan
are delivered up to be judged, that is because he owns nothing other than those things which he has
done in his own unruliness against God.
When we face God, it will be by the same measure. We will not be able to blame anyone, not even
Lucifer, for our own actions of darkness, evil, corruption, and rejection. ëhe most that Lucifer will be
guilty of against us, goes right back to the tree, seduction and deception. Even though he is able to lure
and trick us into ways that are not fitting to God ʹ He cannot make us do anything. So being armed with
this, and looking back into the mirror ʹ we have to ultimately face ourselves. ëhe question is, are we
going to make an honest evaluation of the person looking back at us or are we going to continue down a
path of denying the truth about ourselves. I cannot speak for everyone, but I really do not like it when I
have someone pointing out faults and flaws that I have ʹ I am well aware of them and also embrace the
realization that I am imperfect in many ways. But, who enjoys having another point these things out to
us?

ëhe worst thing that we could do is evaluate ourselves in an

untrue manner. If we do this, despite our like or dislike on any
given issue we have ʹ God will ultimately see, point out, and
judge us on the truth of the matter and no amount of denial
will help us at that point. One of the most difficult things is to
be able to conquer ourselves, and then allow God to conquer
the obstacles in our path to get where we need to be. It
requires one to really open up on the inside and see exactly
who they are individually. If you do this, and allow His grace,
love, and mercy to take hold in your spirit ʹ you will have
found one of the biggest keys that you need to elevate your
spiritual consciousness of His presence.

We have always had the opportunity of denial, even if we are proved guilty beyond any and all
reasonable sense. We can still say, ͞I didn͛t do that͟ or ͞I wasn͛t there͟ ʹ but would we continue to say
that if God was there watching us the whole time? Probably those which do it now, would do it then too
even knowing He was watching the whole time. Who do we think we are kidding or tricking? Perhaps
those which are around us, but what͛s the reward? It͛s like running a race; getting a 1st place trophy for
coming in last and telling everyone that you came in 1st just because you have something for it. A
reward for no effort ʹ is one of the things which upsets many working people in this world because
people are getting them, but aren͛t even worthy of it. And you see ʹ that may work for this world, and
this lifetime, but not the next.

A confessing alcoholic is nothing without making it an obligation, a duty, and taking actions necessary to
quit. Same with a drug user, same with a sex addict, a liar, or any number of spiritually and physically
damaging conditions which could be listed. If someone is talking the talk, but not walking the walk then
they are hoping for that reward and having no investment or drive to truly reach out and get it.
Addictions, psychological problems, deviant behaviors, broken families, no morals taught to our children
ʹ all these things are breaking down the foundation for God in this world ʹ yet all of them can be
reversed and mended, but by one person at a time. It takes months ʹ sometimes years to plan, finance,
and build a building ʹ and only a few minutes to destroy it. ëhe same applies to our spiritual foundation
in God ʹ and also our walk away from the numerous things which are ruling our lives through addictions.
If we don͛t take a firm grip to break away, then we may never do so. An alcoholic for example ʹ can go
months, maybe even years breaking free ʹ and convince themselves that it͛s ok to still drink alcohol and
that they are no longer an alcoholic because they don͛t drink all the time, yet they are going out on
mriday nights binge drinking at the bars. I use alcohol as an example, because for substance abuse in the
world, it ranks #1 on the lists.

Many alcoholics drink because 1) they like who they become, 2) it allows them to escape from facing the
truth, 3) it is driven due to their social status, network of friends, or peers, 4)helps them relax and they
like how it feels, 5) they just like the taste

On a social scale, alcoholism is what destroys the common sense and natural response which would
come from the person if they were sober. Some people are drawn to that, and even more people prey
on people like that ʹ especially women. ëhe sad thing is that most come to a sober realization when it͛s
already too late, something horrible happens, and then it͛s alcohol to the rescue again ʹ to help the
person cope with what͛s happened to them. In a never ending spiral of disillusion, remorse, and regrets.
I came from a family torn apart by alcohol, and even though I did not fall into this trap ʹ I understand it
extremely well.

On a spiritual level, any drug or substance that we put into our bodies ʹ causes our hearts to change,
causes our mind-frame to be altered, causes our bodies to become numb, and causes our spiritual being
to be tainted. So many people do not understand the spiritual being within every one of us, and just
how powerful that being is. ëhe spiritual high from feeling that energy, is greater and more powerful
than any intoxicating effects that drugs or alcohol can create ʹ combined. ëo explain this, especially to
those which fill their bodies with these poisons is near to impossible ʹ and to show them, while they
have these chemicals inside their bodies is completely impossible.

But, for those that are truly seeking the spirit and spiritual understanding they can be shown and
worked with. mor example, I have a spiritual gift of touch ʹ not touch by any means ͞normal͟ because it
is felt throughout the spirit inside the person͛s body. ëhis ability has also shown to have healing
properties ʹ but even more important than that, it allows the person that͛s being touched to actually
feel the spiritual being within them. I am not one to boast on any gift or gifts, because they are that of
God and His allowance, and not my own ʹ but I have also seen skeptics and agnostics/atheists alike
rethinking the foundations of their beliefs or thoughts, which to me is grandiose for the gains the Lord
can profit. I personally have no desire to profit from it, it͛s not for me to gain anything ʹ except another
win for the Lord and the ëruth.

Many automatically assume that I am fabricating fantasies about the ͞Gifts of the Spirit͟, but the gifts of
the spirit shown in scripture are many, diverse, and bountiful to those which seek them. Jesus had all
the spiritual gifts of God and the embodiment of the word itself (the word was made flesh). Jesus also
pointed out that we could become far greater than He, because He was going to His mather͛s kingdom ʹ
but we still have presence on the earth ʹ indicating that there was no limit to how much we could grow
in truth, spirit, or spiritual being.

ëhe same elements are in place for the disbelievers. In truth, one͛s disbelief can be just as powerful as
one͛s belief can. mor this reason, God loves the disbelievers ʹ but he͛s not going to try and work through
them either ʹ it all would be against the God given gift of free will. ëhis gift is not taken lightly by God
because it sets the balance (or scales) for everything and everyone. Even though I have a gift to touch
people ʹ getting a total disbeliever or anarchist towards God to even give me the chance to try and
show them would be nearly impossible. It is a scientific fact, that a person can ͞will͟ themselves to die ʹ
or ͞will͟ themselves to live longer for a purpose (honestly however ʹ God given or granted for such),
and in the same token someone can will themselves to not feel anything supernatural or spiritual, even
if it͛s right in front of them.

Nothing is going to happen without God͛s permission ʹ and by me saying this, it could turn into a
lengthy and heated argument as to why God allows certain things to happen which appear to have no
rhyme or reason. But you would have to understand Him to understand why, and I don͛t think anyone
on this earth can make such a claim safely.

When it comes to spiritual goodness, or spiritual evilness ʹ in our eyes, we look at elements of
something, weigh it to our own opinions, weigh it to society͛s acceptance, weigh it to what we͛ve been
taught, weigh it to any specific morality we possess as a person, weigh it against our religious beliefs ʹ
and then come up with our final determination in the matter.

But our take on goodness, and God͛s take in the matter, is most assuredly very different. People of the
world usually feel that if something is socially acceptable ʹ that it͛s also morally acceptable. Large
groups of people, even cities can be swayed to believe this ʹ and through God͛s righteous judgments for
Sodom and Gomorrah ʹ the answer should be obvious.

ëhe correct thing would be to seek if God would condone certain behaviors or actions, and not just what
the ͞norm͟ believe. At the same time, one would have to be careful in this because one person͛s view
and take on God may be similar ʹ but not necessarily the same as others, and that is where scripture can
ideally come into play, as a tool for learning what has already happened or to find the end results for
specific decisions already made in the past. Common sense would tell you if you were under a rock cliff,
and a boulder was plummeting toward your head ʹ to move, I do not think that anyone would have to
question what the results would be. But for what God wants us to have and hold true to, are things
which need to be sought out. If someone hits a stumbling block and doesn͛t want to accept what
scripture says or agree with God͛s opinion ʹ then generally they will go on and do it, and find whatever
means they wish to excuse themselves from the actual cost or judgment their decision will have. But just
as with the boulder, if it͛s already been answered, it becomes obvious. So is the answer to where we
determine what is good, and evil. Some are doing it properly ʹ while others are making their own way.
Y
'Y
 Y!
America is no longer, the ͞Land of the mree, Home of the Brave͟ ʹ we are economically in a death spiral.
On the surface, it appears that we are starting to come out of the collapse but the problem is much
bigger then what is on the surface. ëake a look at this chart:

m
   


 
È

    





c '(c c '(c c

'c ')c c ')c c

' c  )È
c c  )c c

c ('c c ('c c

c ((c )'c ' c 'c

)c ')( c c 'c 'c

' c  ) c *'c ) '*c  c

'c 'c (c * c )(c

'c% &c )(c  c  c (*c

'c% &c )(*c c  *c *c

''c% &c ()()*c (c ( c ((c

'c% &c *'c *c ''*c ( *c

'c% &c  )c  c ') c ( )c

ëhere is some gap in between 1950 to 2008, I cut out some of the data just to fit the chart on one page.
What is extremely important is to see that our debt has never gone down over time, nor is there any
forecasting charts out there which show any decline to the debt of the United States. When you look at
the chart, understand that the number 12,594.8 is in billions of dollars. ëhis chart shows ONLY what we
owe foreign ministries across the world ʹ because of our borrowing from foreign countries ʹ and not all
the debt associated to the United States. Below is the breakdown of these countries and how much we
currently owe them as of December 2009:

m    4ë

4
  

Nation billions of dollars Percentage

China (Mainland) 894.8 24.3

Japan 765.7 20.8

Oil exporters 207.4 5.6

United Kingdom 178.0 4.8

Brazil 169.3 4.6

Hong Kong 148.7 4.0

Russia 141.8 3.8

Caribbean Banking Centers 128.2 3.5

Taiwan 116.5 3.2

Switzerland 89.7 2.4

All Others 848.9 23.0

Grand Total 3689.0

ëhe US debt in the hands of foreign governments was 25% of the total in 2007, virtually double the 1988
figure of 13%.Despite the declining willingness of foreign investors to continue investing in US dollar
denominated instruments as the US dollar fell in 2007,the U.S. ëreasury statistics indicate that, at the
end of 2006, non-US citizens and institutions held 44% of federal debt held by the public. About 66% of
that 44% was held by the central banks of other countries, in particular the central banks of Japan and
China. In May 2009, the US owed China $772 billion. In total, lenders from Japan and China held 44% of
the foreign-owned debt.
ð    
    
    
 

  

ëhe answer is simpler then the solution. mrom our pocket books: ëhrough taxation, pensions, social
security, stocks bonds and securities. ëhe government has slowly been evolving a program to eliminate
the honest worker, and produce a subservient slave to carry the burden which they have created for all
of us.

We are migrating to a situation where we either work for the program, or wallow in our stool filled holes
that we call ͞home͟. ëhe start of this breakdown occurred in the real estate sectors, so many people
losing their homes from the financial crash and over inflated mortgage payments. ëhe trends are not
getting any better, even though the banks are showing signs and forecasting smoother sailing ahead,
they are still financial institutions and are interested in growth and prosperity just as any other business
or organization. People buying into property beware ʹ what you see from the bank͛s perspective, is only
what they are showing on the surface. Who pays for the capsizing homes and bank owned properties
which they cannot sell appropriately to keep rising earnings fiscally? ëhe current owners of property,
who use the bank in question for their loan. Now, this may not be verbally explained to the righteous
owners of any given property, but rest assured ʹ the bank does not, and will not pay for their losses here
ʹ they will find a method to at least break even for the fiscal year͛s profits.

What was the problem with these loans? Many of the people who lost their homes had option
ARM(͞adjustable rate mortgages͟) loans. ëhese loans gave people the option to pay a very low rate for
a period of time before the loan adjusted to a much higher rate. ëhe problem with these loans was that
the borrowers couldn͛t always afford the true cost of the loan, especially since the loan became more
expensive if they only made the minimum payments. Borrowers had the option to pay more, but many
couldn͛t or wouldn͛t. ëhe minimum payment didn͛t even cover the interest that was accruing so the
excess interest was just tacked on to the principal (meaning that if they borrowed $400,000, they might
end up paying for a $450,000 loan after the reset). When option ARMs reset, the monthly payment
tends to increase 60 to 90 percent. ëo put this into perspective, an 80% increase raises a $1500 monthly
mortgage payment to $2700.

When all of the loans ended up defaulting at the same time, the market became flooded with two types
of properties ʹ homes owned by people trying to sell their houses and homes owned by banks who had
foreclosed on the previous owner who was unable to make their payments. ëhis surplus of properties
on the market, in conjunction with the banks doing damage control and reducing their risk by lending
only to the most qualified borrowers drove the prices down as sellers had more and more difficulty
selling their houses. Newer communities or neighborhoods where a lot of houses had been sold in 2004,
2005 and 2006 were hit hardest.

One of the most horrible things that a US citizen will ever have to face, is never feeling they have the
right, or ability to own property in the United States of America. ëhis was absolutely unheard of, back in
the 1920s-1950s ʹ if we had decent jobs, and were modest in the way we handled our finances there
was absolutely no reason we could not invest in our own plot of land ʹ and settle down. Now, the most
that many middle class individuals have the ability to do is rent ʹ because of the complete breakdown of
real estates, and banks.
ëhis is not all by accident however, there were many ways that the government could have enacted to
pacify the threat. ëhey however, did not.

USD GBP CAD ‰UR AUD

1 1.50612 0.967651 1.3641 0.902421

0.663954 1 0.642476 0.905699 0.599166

1.03343 1.55647 1 1.4097 0.932589

0.733084 1.10411 0.709369 1 0.66155

1.10813 1.66898 1.07228 1.5116 1

As of current , if you look at the above chart, you will see how the American dollar reflects to several
other countries ʹ which is Britain, Euro(pa), Australia, and Canada. ëhere are more complete listings out
on the internet for whoever is interested in tracking this data ʹ but the point which I want to make is
this ʹ where the United States dollar actually was worth something at one point in history ʹ is now
considerably down in worth compared to other countries. We are currently #6 in the full list of currency
values ʹ making us #6 in wealth and prosperity ʹ globally. Because of this reason, and our apparent
inability to fix the US first, then worry about everything else in the world ʹ we risk financial takeover
from other countries ʹ period. Our country could eventually be bought out, or borrowed out to the
point that we lose the US of A, in its entirety. How can one of the great ͞world powers͟ be so incredibly
short sighted?

It͛s not in truth, everything is going exactly as planned from the spiritual scope of things.

ëhe bible, speaks of love for money being at the root of all evil. In 1 ëimothy 6:1-10, it gives example of
this:

1 Let as many servants as are under the yoke count their own masters worthy of all honour, that the
name of God and his doctrine be not blasphemed. 2 And they that have believing masters, let them not
despise them, because they are brethren; but rather do them service, because they are faithful and
beloved, partakers of the benefit. ëhese things teach and exhort.

3 If any man teach otherwise, and consent not to wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Jesus
Christ, and to the doctrine which is according to godliness; 4 He is proud, knowing nothing, but doting
about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy, strife, railings, evil surmisings, 5 Perverse
disputings of men of corrupt minds, and destitute of the truth, supposing that gain is godliness: from
such withdraw thyself. 6 But godliness with contentment is great gain. 7 mor we brought nothing into
this world, and it is certain we can carry nothing out. 8 And having food and raiment let us be therewith
content. 9 But they that will be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and hurtful
lusts, which drown men in destruction and perdition. 10 mor the love of money is the root of all evil:
which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with
many sorrows.

In a nut shell, it is talking about being content with what we have, if we have food and covering ʹ we͛re
ok. ëhe problem is, the world͛s greed and corruption (also shown in the same scripture) can ransack
other͛s ability to have these simple things. We have came a perverse nation, allowing children ʹ and
others to suffer out of its own greed and misguidance. We see other͛s misfortunes and ͞unfortunate͟,
but what is being done about it? We say, ͞that͛s sad͟ ʹ but are you doing anything instead of counting
how much you have and being thankful that you͛re not there?

No ʹ I am not trying to lay blame on any specific person with that statement, this is something that
should be unheard of in our country. We can all pull together for resources to Haiti during their crisis,
but turn a blind eye to our own problem here in the United States. I really have to question our motives?
Is it more acceptable because we make a one time contribution ʹ instead of helping a family to survive
until better circumstances come about? ëhat we were somehow being a ͞good Samaritan͟, and now we
can go back to ignoring the issues for a while, as if the problem has been taken care of? If anything, this
issue is directed toward our government, more than anything. Semper-mi or Semper midelis is Latin for
"Always maithful" ʹ I think we as a country need to put this to the test in the streets, and not just as a
motto for the Marine Corps.

If we continue with the mindset that this is not our problem, we are wrong͙ It͛s everyone͛s problem ʹ
and if we don͛t feel it in the pockets now, we will eventually.. ëhe spiral decay will eventually hit
everyone no matter where they are perched. As the economical and social decay continues to head
downward ʹ everything increasingly gets more and more expensive, jobs continue to become less
available as companies fold, more people in the streets giving rise to higher taxation and greater
government provisions ʹ crime increases, death increases, illnesses become rampant, until the entire
system collapses on itself and we that are still with, are still in a state of ͞standing by͟ because we didn͛t
think it would ever come to this. A little too little, a little too late.. Hindsight may be 20/20 but the
problems are not going to correct themselves.

With the social and economical structure that we have today, many of the personal responsibilities and
obligations which we feel toward one another, stay close to the family unit ʹ and don͛t go much further.
Back in the days of colonization, and even to the days of the old west (͞little house on the prairie͟) ʹ if
you were an honest person looking for honest work you could find it. If you did not have a place, many
times the business owner would furnish you a place to stay. ëhere was more of a brotherly and sisterly
respect, and establishment back then, as opposed to what we have now ʹ there were always people
outside of what was established as being right and wrong, gunslingers ʹ bullies, ruffians, and the like
which used fear and terror to get their way ʹ but this was not the majority.

We, proved by sciences and already established in the scripture, are family to one another. mrom distant
ancestors, it all still takes root back to super ancestors, and finally back to a main source. Science can
map the ë chromosome back to its origins, and it has already been proven that we all match up as being
related back to the same common ancestors. If that is the case, what happens to another ʹ isn͛t just
another, but a family member ʹ immediate or not does change the fact, or the case.

We take things like this with little thought ʹ but it is unlikely God will take that with little consideration
when it͛s time. Especially for those which do harm to others with little thought or concern.

Which leads me to the second portion of the economic collapse, not just in the united states ʹ but also
in almost every country which buy/sell/trade as a economical means of prosperity and stability.

Revelation 13:17ʹ18
And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number
of his name. Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is
the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.

ëhis revelation passage has been debated for many years, and in truth there are a wide variety of
thoughts and view which can go toward it. But we have to cautiously remember, that revelation is based
on the words of Jesus, and also the prophecies of Daniel. Most of the end time scriptures are exactly
that ʹ toward the end. You have to understand what the scripture is saying at it͛s very start. No man will
be able to buy or sell except those with the mark, or the name, or the number ʹ in other words those
which conform, adhere, and embrace this model of the antichrist. ëhe model is not one which could
have been shaped thousands of years ago ʹ there was not enough control over the people to do it. Most
people were simple back then, shepherds, farmers, tradesmen. If someone put a system into place,
people would have just avoided it and went about their sales and trades privately with other individuals.
Now a days however, we are heavily reliant on our financial income to survive through jobs, securities,
bonds, loans, and institutions that if there was a change enforced, most would find it necessary to
comply to the changes.

ëhis is what I see happening right now, in this day and age.

Revelation 13:16 says this:

And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right
hand, or in their foreheads

ëhis is the major indicator of what is going to be seen as a system of economics, by means of either
force or necessity. Currently the state of the economy of the entire world is in collapse, we are only
seeing the very early stages of it, the worst is yet to come. You can check on the Russian economy ʹ a
single loaf of bread costs around $10.00 in some areas and the reason for outrageous prices is the value
of the money itself, and the manufacturers of the bread have to earn enough to stay in business. In
impoverished countries, the cost of goods is so high that things like store bought items is considered
luxury. We here in the US take things like this with a grain of salt and our own lavish lifestyles for
granted, but what happens when jobs become even more scarce, manufacturers see a greater decline of
their product being bought out in the market? ëhe first thing, is cutbacks in labor to reduce cost ʹ the
next step is either closing out or increasing prices to sustain the company. Once you get down to the
bare minimums ʹ the options become increasingly smaller.. If the company folds, it gives room for
another manufacturer of the same sort of goods, to increase their prices ʹ because the demand will fall
more heavily on them and they have a greater corner in the market. Look around you, businesses once
thriving in strip malls ʹ have moved out, stores which have been open for years, closing ʹ businesses
closing their doors because they cannot sustain their company any longer because no one has the
money to spend. Building after building for lease or sale, houses empty ʹ homeowners gone.. ëaxation
and cost of living expenses becomes greater to those which still reside in the impoverished areas.

I told a close friend about 6 or 7 years ago, that the mark of the beast was very real ʹ that fear,
knowledge, technology, and terrorism would be the catalysts, but there would have to be a great
collapse in the currency in order for the country to mandate a different type of system then what we
have today. And the need for a newly found system will be a great one as time marches on, because of
what is found in Revelation:

Revelation 6:5,6 ʹ And when he had opened the third seal, I heard the third beast say, Come and see.
And I beheld, and lo a black horse; and he that sat on him had a pair of balances in his hand. [6] And I
heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures
of barley for a penny; and see thou hurt not the oil and the wine.

ëhe population explosion, which suddenly burst on the scene, was not a great surprise to the human
race. ëhe world͛s population has roughly, in a somewhat similar pattern, followed the old formula of
daily penny doubling. Suppose someone proposed to give you five billion dollars if you would double a
penny he gave you for forty days, and then give him all the proceeds of the doubling process on the
fortieth day ʹ Would you take the deal? A single penny on the first day would produce two cents on the
second day, four cents on the third day, eight cents on the fourth day, sixteen cents on the fifth day,
thirty-two cents on the sixth day, sixty-four cents on the seventh day, and only a dollar and twenty-eight
cents on the eighth day. So, based on what you͛ve read so far, it seems like a pretty good deal. But on
day forty you would have to fork over more than five billion dollars. ëhis principle has been the
backbone of when the famine prophecy prediction would occur ever since eight people stepped off the
Ark of Noah. ëhis principle opened the famine seal, and will cause it to intensify until Armageddon.

ëhe world͛s famine outbreaks in its developing countries have been occurring closer and closer together
in time since World War II, and the trend will accelerate until the Second Advent. Why? A few thousand
years ago eight men and women descended in an ark ͞upon the mountains of Ararat,͟ and then began
to multiply. At first, like the penny, the increase was insignificant from a numerical standpoint. When
Jesus was born the world population had only reached about 200 million. When Columbus sailed the
ocean blue in 1492 it had barely reached 400 million. But, like the multiplying principle of the penny, it
began to accelerate noticeably about the time of the Civil War, and exploded after the Great Depression
of the thirties. In 1989 the world population reached five billion and, the same year, eleven million of
the earth͛s residents died of starvation. ëhe population of our planet passed six billion in October of
1999, and is predicted to reach ten billion in 2030. Some say it will only reach between eight and nine
billion by 2030. But even if that is true, how can the additional three plus billion be fed, if eleven million
died of starvation in 1989 with a population of only five billion.

Some say, ͞don͛t worry, agricultural technology is on the way to solving the famine problem.͟ No way!
ëhe latest U.N. study found ten percent of the world͛s soil profile badly damaged. ëhe three-year study
accessed the soil conditions on a global scale, and involved more than 250 soil scientists. It marked the
first time since World War II that soil profiles had been accessed on a global scale. As reported by Larry
B. Stammer in the Los Angeles ëimes, the study found that ͞about two-thirds of all seriously eroded land
is in Asia and Africa, home to most of the world͛s poor. ëhe article, using the report as its basis,
proclaimed: ͞Despite the much acclaimed great green revolution of the past several decades, which
have produced unprecedented gains in food production by the introduction of fertilizers and hybrid
grains, per-capita food production has declined in some eighty developing countries in the past decade͟
ëhe 1993 report, ͞Vital Signs, ëhe ërends ëhat Are Shaping Our muture,͟ as reported in the Arkansas
Democrat Gazette of July 18, 1993, stated: ͞ëhis new report shows the first clear sign that population is
outpacing the available food supply for humans. ëhe trend is mostly because of record world population
growth, but also reflects a slowdown after decades of increasing food supplies. ëhe main sources of food
ʹ farms, ranches, and oceans ʹ all are approaching, or may have reached, their maximum per-capita
output, according to the Vital Signs Report.͟

ëhe simple truth is this, in 1993, for the first time since records began to be maintained, world food
utilization exceeded world food production. Utilization continued to exceed food production until 1996,
and a massive endeavor was made by technology to catch up with utilization. ëhe endeavor allowed
food production to pass utilization in 1996, and it continued to exceed utilization until 1999, but the
population passed six billion in October of 1999, and the production again fell below utilization, where it
has remained to the present. In April of 2003, a report published by the International Committee of the
mourth International, stated that 200 million people in Africa are malnourished. ëhe world food
production has not been able to keep up with the stork in the twenty-first century, and the disparity can
only increase with an increasing population growth.

So where is the development of the mark today? Well, if you go to your grocery stores, your all-in-one
shops, and many of the bigger marketplaces ʹ you will find a device which is revolutionizing the way that
we scan in and scan out of our stores:
Currently you will find, automated system readily available for quick check out. No cashier to talk to or
wait for, no worries about getting double charged, no worries about handing checks or credit card
information to someone who could steal it. Quick, easy, painless. While this system is one which relies
on cash, check, or charge being fed to it ʹ the technology itself is only an infant prototype of what is on
the horizon for the world.

ëhis unit is the wave of the future

ëhis device is what is known as the RmID checkout station ʹ and when
you start seeing these gizmos in the shopping centers ʹ beware, the
mark of the beast is coming quickly. Most individuals are not even
aware that these are in production by several manufacturers, and are
starting to take the world by storm for their ease and operation. All
you have to do is take your cart , and push it through a single scanner
system ʹ the checkout station tallies all the items in your cart, and
the only thing left for you to do is pay, bag your groceries, and leave.
Because the system is RmID based technology, it will be very easy for
it to be converted into accepting the RmID chip which are being
injected into the ͞brave few͟ who have decided to ͞take technology
into their own hands͟, literally. I thought, how insane can someone
be to even conceive of such a thing ʹ but then I remembered that when things really get crazy as the
world continues to spiral out of control, more and more stringent methods will be incorporated ʹ until
eventually we find ourselves either having the mark, and able to go through one of these systems ʹ or
not having the mark ʹ and not being able to buy or sell. If you take out all the cashiers, replace them
with these units ʹ and have several armed cronies with M16s to make sure no one is cheating the
system, a forced credit system using RmID technology would be required to make it in life. Crazy and
space age sounding, yes ʹ but with everything that is happening in the world ʹ its not that far off, or
even far-fetched for that matter.
About 7 years ago I started reading stories like this one:

(CNN) -- Queuing to get into one nightclub in Spain could soon be a thing of the past for regular
customers thanks to a tiny computer chip implanted under their skin.ëhe technology, known as a
VeriChip, also means nightclubbers can leave their cash and cards at home and buy drinks using a
scanner. ëhe bill can then be paid later.

ëhe system is also designed to curb identity theft and prevent fraudulent access to credit card accounts
that is increasingly common in crowded restaurants and clubs.Clubbers who want to join the scheme at
Baja Beach Club in Barcelona pay 125 euros for the VeriChip -- about the size of a grain of rice -- to be
implanted in their body.

ëhen when they pass through a scanner the chip is activated and it emits a signal containing the
individual's number, which is then transmitted to a secure data storage site. ëhe club's director, Conrad
Chase, said he began using the VeriChip, made by Applied Digital Solutions, in March 2004 because he
needed something similar to a VIP card and wanted to provide his customers with better service.

"I believe we should use new technology to provide our customers with the best service and
entertainment," Chase told CNN. He said 10 of the club's regular customers, including himself, have
been implanted with the chip, and predicted more would follow. "I know many people who want to be
implanted," said Chase. "Almost everybody now has a piercing, tattoos or silicone. Why not get the chip
and be original?" In the wake of the Madrid train bombings that killed 190 people in March, Chase said
VeriChip could also boost security by speeding up checks at airports, for example. He denied the scheme
had any drawbacks. ëhe VeriChip is an in-house debit card and contains no personal information. It is
made of glass so poses no health risk, Chase said.

ëhis was the mentality in 2004 ʹ ͞Why not get the chip and be original͟, or ͞We offer discounts to chip
owners͟, or ͞It can protect your identity, credit card accounts, or medical information͟. But this
mentality is now shifting to something on a larger scale:

In August of 2006 this release went to the newspapers:

A mlorida company wants to get under the skin of 1.4 million U.S. servicemen and women.

VeriChip Corp, based in Delray Beach, mla., and described by the D.C. Examiner as "one of the most
aggressive marketers of radio frequency identification chips," is hoping to convince the Pentagon to
allow them to insert the chips, known as RmID (Radio mrequency Identification) chips under the skin of
the right arms of U.S. servicemen and servicewomen to enable them to scan an arm and obtain that
person͛s identity and medical history. ëhe chips would replace the legendary metal dog tags that have
been worn by U.S. military personnel since 1906.
ëhe device is usually implanted above the triceps area of an individual͛s right arm, but can also by
implanted in the hand if scanned at the proper frequency. ëhe VeriChip responds with a unique 16-digit
number, which can correlate the user to information stored on a database for identity verification,
medical records access, and other uses. ëhe insertion procedure is performed under local anesthetic,
and once inserted it is invisible to the naked eye.

ëhe company, which the Examiner notes has powerful political connections, is "in discussions͟ with the
Pentagon, VeriChip spokeswoman Nicole Philbin told the Examiner. "ëhe potential for this technology
doesn͛t just stop at the civilian level,͟ Philbin said. Company officials have touted the chips as versatile,
able to be used in a variety of situations such as helping track illegal immigrants or giving doctors
immediate access to patient͛s medical records.

On Monday the Department of State started to issue electronic passports (e-passports) equipped with
RmID chips. According to reports the U.S. government has placed an order with a California company,
Infineon ëechnologies North America, for smart chip-embedded passports.

ëhe Associated Press said the new U.S. passports include an electronic chip that contains all the data
contained in the paper version name, birth date, gender, for example and can be read by digital
scanners at equipped airports. ëhey cost 14 percent more than their predecessors but the State
Department said they will speed up going through Customs and help enhance border security.

mebruary 28, 2006

͞When Big Brother Gets Under Your Skin͟

by Maureen marrell

"Can a microscopic tag be implanted in a person's body to track his every movement? ëhere's actual
discussion about that. You will rule on that -- mark my words -- before your tenure is over." -- Sen.
Joseph Biden, to Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, Sept. 2005.

On meb. 12, the minancial ëimes reported on CityWatcher.com, a Cincinnati-based company implanted
RmID (Radio mrequency ID) silicon chips into two of its employees. ëhe company defended the practice,
assuring that the procedure was not meant to track employees or infringe on their rights, but anti-RmID
activists took exception. "It worries us that a government contractor that specializes in surveillance
projects would be the first to publicly incorporate this technology in the workplace," Liz McIntyre said in
a press release, triggering "irate e-mails" to CityWatcher.com's Web site.

McIntyre, co-author of Spychips: How Major Corporations and Government Plan to ërack Your Every
Move with RmID, and Communications Director for Consumers Against Supermarket Privacy Invasion and
Numbering (CASPIAN) has been at the fore of a campaign against this new technology, alongside
CASPIAN founder and director and Spychips co-author Katherine Albrecht. In a Dec. 2005 interview in
Mother Jones, Albrecht underscored deeper concerns, particularly now that former Bush administration
official ëommy ëhompson serves on the board of Applied Digital, the company that manufactures
VeriChip.

MJ: What's your take on the VeriChip Company and ëommy ëhompson -- former Secretary of Health and
Human Services under the Bush administration and now VeriChip Board member -- advocating more
RmID technology for medical information?

KA: It absolutely scares the heck out of me. In the last six months to a year, this company has really
stepped up its efforts to get some powerful players behind it. ëhe fact that people listen to this with a
straight face is even more extraordinary to me. You've got ëommy ëhompson talking about linking
medical records with a chip implanted in your arm. You've got Senator Joe Biden in the Supreme Court
confirmation hearings talking about implant chips to track people with a straight face. It's unbelievable
how quickly we've gone from saying "Oh, that's pet chipping technology, we'll never put that in people"
to people with a straight face suddenly talking about implanting chips into American citizens. ëerrifying.

ëhe Harvard-educated Albrecht, it should be pointed out, also believes that this technology relates to
the "Mark of the Beast" referred to in the book of Revelation. "ëhe Mark of the Beast, 666: a prophesy
from 2000 years ago. How many people (know that) technological developments of the last 10 to 20
years could be combining to make the Mark of the Beast a reality, and possibly even in our lifetimes?"
she asks in a video entitled On the Brink of the Mark.

ëhough religious convictions fuel her passion, Albrecht says privacy concerns extend beyond religious
and political lines. "Regardless of whether your beliefs are progressive or conservative, socially or
politically, everybody's got a reason to not want somebody spying on them," she told Mother Jones.
"Whether you're afraid that Big Brother is going to take the form of an evil corporation or Big Brother is
going to take the form of an evil government or take whatever form, everybody's got a reason to be
concerned."

Not everyone sees something sinister looming behind this new technology, however.

RmID chips are currently being used to track everything from products to consumer trends to pets to
medical histories. Mississippi morgue workers used RmID chips to inventory "unidentified remains" in the
wake of Hurricane Katrina and more than 800 hospitals are currently using RmID technology to monitor
infants in maternity wards. Hackensack University Medical Center in Hackensack, N.J. has installed
equipment to read medical information from implanted chips, while 68 other hospitals are poised to do
the same.

ëechdirt, the highly touted blog charged with "decoding tech news for the masses" has also pointed to
this technology's benefits. "ëhere's a crowd of folks who are extremely anti-RmID chips. ëhey often raise
important privacy issues, but they tend to go a bit overboard in their stance in that they rarely offer any
kind of solution to RmID chips other than to ban them all completely. ëhat's the wrong approach, since
RmIDs can have real value, and many of the downsides can be solved with technology," wrote Mike on
ëechdirt's site. (Albrecht also concedes that RmID "is a great technology if you want to track things from
point A to point B" but says that the benefits "absolutely pale in comparison to the risks that this
technology poses").

ëechdirt, however, shares some of Albrecht's concerns. "[If] there's one company in the space that
seems worth being extra skeptical about, it's Applied Digital, the makers of the VeriChip -- an
implantable RmID chip," Mike wrote, before chronicling less savory aspects of the company's history.
"We were quite surprised, in fact, to hear earlier this year that former Health & Human Services
Secretary ëommy ëhompson agreed, not only to be on their board, but also to get chipped himself.
ëurns out, though, that he might not have really meant it," he added. (ëhough ëhompson vowed to get
an RmID implant in July, 2005, as of December, he had yet to do so.)

Skittishness is understandable, as many see a sizable difference between having products tracked
through RmID chips and using the same technology in people. "ëhis may be appropriate for cattle, pets
or packages, but for humans it is a very different issue," Lee ëien, an attorney for the Electronic mrontier
moundation, told the Chicago ëribune. Paula Brantner, an attorney for Workplace mairness, believes most
employees would balk at the idea of being chipped. "ëhis is incredible. It raises something out of '1984.'
It is a very invasive way of keeping tabs on your workers," she said.

Others argue that implanted microchips pose a risk beyond Big Brother concerns. Independent
researcher Jonathan Westhues has demonstrated how easy it is to hack and clone imbedded chips and
steal information. "I could sit next to you on the subway, and read your chip's ID. At this point I can
break in to your house, by replaying that ID. So now you have to change your ID; but as far as I know,
you cannot do this without surgery," he wrote on his Web site.

ëhough recent polls show that 81% of Americans believe "that the right to privacy [is] 'essential',"
Applied Digital's CEO Scott Silverman says Americans are becoming more receptive to the idea of RmID
implants. "When we first announced VeriChip, a network poll asked people if they would put one in
their bodies. Only 9% said yes," Silverman said, noting that the percentage rose to 33% once ëommy
ëhompson signed on. A study conducted by Applied Digital later indicated that 80% of those polled said
they "would have a VeriChip implant to identify their medical records in case of an emergency."

ëhough this technology took root during World War II, in the past few years, it has been brought to the
national consciousness through several surreal avenues. Hollywood remakes such as the Manchurian
Candidate and the Stepford Wives featured chipping as a means of control and manipulation; Oklahoma
City bomber ëimothy McVeigh famously complained the US Army had implanted a chip in his right
buttock; and the History Channel featured a discussion of the possibility of a future "microchip
population" in a segment on secret societies. (ëhe idea was forwarded by David Icke, it should be noted,
who also believes that both Presidents Bush and Bill and Hillary Clinton belong to a race of shape-
shifting reptiles.)
Lately, however, RmID news has moved beyond the surreal to become 100% real -- and the progression
has been amazingly swift:

* In 2000, Katharine Mieszkowski wrote an article for Salon, pointing to a future wherein implants are
inserted into children, soldiers, employees and Alzheimer's patients. "ëhe whoa-dude notion of
surveillance chips being installed in human beings is poised to cross over from the realm of science
fiction into everyday reality, and soon," she noted, adding, "What's disturbing is just how quickly these
devices, which only recently would have been laughed off as a cyborg fantasy, are becoming accepted."
mive years later, ëommy ëhompson told the Philadelphia Inquirer that the new technology "will prevent
babies from being picked up by the wrong people in a maternity ward and make sure people in nursing
homes don't walk away."

* In 2002, "the summer of the child abduction" was punctuated by a front page article in the
Philadelphia Inquirer, which addressed the benefits of chipping children and then monitoring them via
global satellite positioning systems. "We have GPS units for our cars If your car is stolen, we can locate
it. Do we love our cars more than our children?," Applied Digital spokesman Matthew Cossolotto asked.

* In 2003, California State Senator Debra Bowen addressed security concerns regarding RmID
technology. "How would you like it if, for instance, one day you realized your underwear was reporting
on your whereabouts?," she said during a hearing. In Jan. 2006, the Cleveland Plain Dealer made a
similar observation. "One of the insidious ways corporations can draw information -- and, hence, gain
advantage -- from consumers' wallets, bank accounts and shopping habits is with a technology called
Radio mrequency Identification," the paper noted.

* In July 2005, the tech blog Boing Boing featured back-to-back entries regarding imbedded chips.
"President Bush's former Health and Human Services Secretary, ëommy ëhompson, onetime Governor
of Wisconsin, is getting an RmID implant. Why is he volunteering for the Mark of the Best? Promotional
reasons! ëhompson is on the board of Applied Digital, owner of RmID vendor VeriChip," the site
explained.

* In Sept. 2005, after Sen. Joseph Biden discussed "chipping" during Supreme Court Chief Justice John
Roberts' confirmation hearings, the Washington Post ran an amusing op-ed on the subject. "I can't wait
for the day when we all have microchips implanted in our heads," Catherine Getches wrote, adding that
"by 2006 the State Department plans to put Radio mrequency Identification (RmID) tags into new U.S.
passports to keep track of us."

* In meb. 2006, the Chicago ëribune reported that approximately 70 people in the US are now sporting
implants ("mostly for medical reasons") and that the technology has been adopted worldwide.
Employees at the organized-crime division of Mexico's attorney general office in Mexico City have
implanted microchips, as do "2,000 patrons of nightclubs in Barcelona, Spain, and Rotterdam,
Netherlands."
In Sept., 2001, the late Hunter S. ëhompson assessed the state of our Brave New World. "ëhe 22 babies
born in New York City while the World ërade Center burned will never know what they missed. ëhe last
half of the 20th century will seem like a wild party for rich kids, compared to what's coming now," he
wrote. While that seems true enough, what will the future hold for those babies' babies? Newborns are
already being tracked via RmID technology, and it's not unfeasible that "chipping" could become as
commonplace as circumcision. After all, when a former government official tells a major daily
newspaper that RmID "will prevent babies from being picked up by the wrong people in a maternity ward
and make sure people in nursing homes don't walk away" and announces plans to get "chipped" himself,
the day might come when Big Brother could literally get under our skins.

After all, in the past few years, the notion of Big Brother has gone from George Orwell's fantasy to
mainstream acceptance. And though Mark of the Beast superstitions are often quite laughable, they
become less humorous against the backdrop of today's Apocalyptic political climate. ("ëhis is going to be
just like the Book of Revelation said it was going to be -- the end of the world as we knew it," ëhompson
concluded in July, 2003 -- an assessment a surprising number of Americans seem to share.)͟

In 2010 ʹ many of our US servicemen and women are being taunted to get chipped, and because the
military stresses to always follow orders or requests from higher ranks, most are. Many
industrial/manufacturing companies in Europe require their employees to have a chip implanted into
them, before they are even considered for hire.

If you do a search on the internet for RmID or VeriChip ʹ you will come up with more than you bargained
for. Many retailers are going toward the automated checkout lines, both NCR and IBM have designs for
a RmID automatic checkout, where the RmIDs are scanned and you don͛t even have to pull the items out
of your cart. It will get to the point that RmID and implantable chips will be a requirement for buying and
selling. No one seems to be conscious to the fact that this new scheme is that of the antichrist.

I have designed a model, and a plan ʹ that could reshape the way we live. ëhat could bring us back to
the ways of the old and allow us to live together in balance, without money, aid, jobs, institutions, or
organizations. It consists of some of the most basics of human achievement, and requires very little
effort. I have talked to many people and asked the same general questions ʹ people are thrilled about
the idea, think it would work perfectly. ëhe primary drawback and what loses people͛s interest is that
modernization would have to go out the door. ëhe cell phones, internet, computers, televisions, and all
the luxuries we have come to incorporate into our way of living ʹ would be useless. When people think
of human achievement and endeavor ʹ they think of technology and advances in sciences. When I think
of human achievement and endeavor ʹ I think of strength, courage, and determination to do the best
for one another. ëwo separate scores, two separate sets of principals. I hope to one day put my plan
into action ʹ first on a small scale, and let it grow from there ʹ but until then, it will remain a dream.

What isn͛t a dream is that we are not helpless or hopeless ʹ we can break out of the mold which the
world governments have set up for us. I͛m not talking about being a gunslinger, as in the days of old ʹ
but rather introduce a better way of living for ourselves and for others which are around us.
Reincorporation of family morals and values by restructuring our way of thinking to the way which
works ʹ such as the way of our grandfathers, or great grandfathers. ëhere are many ways that we can
make positive impacts not only on our immediate family, but also amongst the scores of people around
us ʹ just by acting as a example. We have to get back to the basic principles of what is right and wrong,
good and evil, and start washing ourselves of all the negativity we are allowing to creep in through the
back door. ëhis country was built on a system of fundamentals, but that system of fundamentals had a
strong set of principals as well. If we are to ever achieve that greatness back, it has to start with each of
us individually. As of right now, if I would go outside ʹ I would be in a land of strangers. If the
fundamentals which were once present in society would come back to their former glory ʹ I wouldn͛t
feel so isolated; instead I would feel comfortable knowing that the majority of people out there embrace
ideals similar to my own.


Y
( 
%
m

 



 

ëhe bible in all its greatness, cannot grant any wisdom to those which do not seek the deeper meaning
of its contents. We all rely heavily on biblical scholars, pastors, ministers, rabbis, and other spiritual or
church leaders to guide us in our understanding of the secrets which the Holy scriptures contain. But all
of them were taught by a teacher, who was taught by a teacher, who was taught by a teacher.
Identification by concept and learned response is one of the great drawbacks that many spiritual leaders
have in regards to biblical definitions. In order to truly understand an ant, one must become an ant ʹ we
have the ability to study and understand certain things that ants do as far as tasks and hoarding are
concerned, but we know nothing about the thoughts, emotions, struggles, trials, or how the ant
perceives the world around them. Much is the same for God, we cannot fathom God͛s thoughts, works,
or reasons ʹ they are far too structured and superior than our own, just as our thoughts, works, or
reasons are far too advanced for an ant to comprehend. Yet ʹ we rely on others to provide us with the
answers ʹ instead of trying to understand God on a more personal level.

By taking the teachings of man and trying to establish God in our lives, we generally will see Him as
being present on earth and active in our lives ʹ but yet there is still a distance in between. Almost as if
He is there, but He is boxed outside of our immediate area ʹ and other divine presences work in His
absence. How closer can one get, then existing within your own body and being? When Adam was
created, God breathed ͞the breath of life͟ into him. Before that, he was nothing more than a
construction of surface dirt.

ëhe divine connection between man and God ʹ and man with the earth was something that many of the
Native Americans acknowledged without a bible in hand, because they were spiritually connected with
God on a much deeper level than we are today. We look at the culture and faith structure of the Native
Americans from an outside perspective; we do not take it all in as we should. What we would see if we
did is the Indians gave tribute to God, the Creator with just about everything. ëheir ceremonies were
thick in praise to God ʹ but the question remains, how did they know without having European
influences and the Holy Bible?

ëhe ancient Egyptians had what͛s called today as ͞ëhe Book of the Dead͟ ʹ and there are many which
believe that the 10 commandments of the Old ëestament are based upon these hieroglyphs. I instead
believe that it follows hand in hand with how the Indians have the commandments, and also how other
distant cultures had these same laws of life ʹ it was given to them by God, the mather.

In chapter 125 of the book of the dead, the individual has to appear before 42 judges and has to answer
42 questions.

͞Hail to thee, great God, Lord of the ëwo ëruths. I have come unto thee, my Lord, that thou mayest
bring me to see thy beauty. I know thee, I know thy name, I know the names of the 42 Gods who are
with thee in this broad hall of the ëwo ëruths . . . Behold, I am come unto thee. I have brought thee
truth; I have done away with sin for thee. I have not sinned against anyone. I have not mistreated
people. I have not done evil instead of righteousness . . . I have not reviled the God. I have not laid
violent hands on an orphan. I have not done what the God abominates . . . I have not killed; I have not
turned anyone over to a killer. I have not caused anyone͛s suffering . . . I have not copulated (illicitly); I
have not been unchaste. I have not increased nor diminished the measure, I have not diminished the
palm; I have not encroached upon the fields. I have not added to the balance weights; I have not
tempered with the plumb bob of the balance. I have not taken milk from a child͛s mouth; I have not
driven small cattle from their herbage͙ I have not stopped (the flow of) water in its seasons; I have not
built a dam against flowing water. I have not quenched a fire in its time . . . I have not kept cattle away
from the God͛s property. I have not blocked the God at his processions. ͞

ëhe Maya/Aztecs ʹ almost the exact identity of the spiritual laws and sacraments can be taken directly
from their legal system and punishments.

͞Under the Aztec legal system, crimes were severely punished. While capital punishment was common,
other punishments included restitution, loss of office, destruction of the offender͛s home, prison
sentences, slavery, and shaving the offender͛s head. mor certain crimes, punishment could extend to the
family of the guilty party. ëhese crimes included theft, treachery, and a priest͛s violation of the rule of
chastity. ëhe Aztecs had a prison system, which included the cuauhcalli (a "death row"), the teilpiloyan
(a debtors͛ prison), the petlacalli (a prison for individuals who were found guilty of minor crimes), and a
fourth type of prison which involved a judge drawing lines or placing sticks on the ground and ordering
the prisoner not to cross them. Conditions in the petlacalli were so harsh that many prisoners died while
in custody.

Numerous offenses were punishable by death, including homicide, perjury, rape, abortion, highway
robbery, moving boundary markers, serious defamation of character, destruction of crops, selling stolen
property, weight and measure fraud, witchcraft, incest, official graft, pederasty, inciting a public
disturbance, sedition, treason, desertion or insubordination by soldiers, use of the emperor͛s insignia,
and serious judicial misconduct. Capital punishment could be carried out through hanging, drowning,
stoning, strangulation, beheading, beating, disembowelment, burning, quartering, and opening the
chest to remove the perpetrator's heart. It was possible for victims or families of victims to intervene in
the execution of a sentence. If they chose to forgive the perpetrator, his death sentence was removed
and he would become a slave of the victim͛s family.

ëheft was considered a serious crime. Capital offenses included theft from merchants, theft from a
temple, theft of arms or military insignia, and theft of more than 20 ears of corn. Petty theft was
generally punished through restitution. If the perpetrator wasn͛t able to pay for the stolen item, he
became the victim's slave.

Adultery was a capital offense for the guilty couple and for those who were aware of the offense and
failed to report it. Men were punished for adultery only they had relations with a married woman.
Married women were considered guilty regardless of the circumstances of the marital status of their
lovers.
Public drunkenness was punishable by death for younger individuals. However, elders could consume as
much alcohol as they wished.

Children under the age of ten were considered to be legally incapable of committing criminal acts, but
were still expected to respect and obey their parents. If they failed to do so, their parents could bring
them before the court, which could order punishments such as beatings, disinheritance, or death
(especially if children assaulted their parents). Children of nobility were sentenced to death if they were
disrespectful, cowardly, or wasteful.

Sources: Aguilar-Moreno (2006), Avalos (1994), Carter (1964), Kellogg (1995), and Seus (1969)͟

ëheir main God / Deity was Quetzalcoatl. His message of love and wisdom is reflected in the following
advice of an Aztec noble to his sons:

"ëake great pains to make yourselves friends of God who is in all parts, and is invisible and impalpable,
and it is meet that you give Him all your heart and body, and look that you be not proud in your heart,
nor yet despair, nor be cowardly of spirit; but that you be humble in your heart and have hope in God.
Be at peace with all, shame yourselves before none and to none be disrespectful; respect all, esteem all,
defy no one, for no reason affront any person."

Quetzalcoatl was described as a white man, with a beard, who wore long robes, and who gave a
message of love, forbidding the blood sacrifice, teaching of the One Supreme God, and giving the ëoltecs
many material things of their culture, such as the calendar. He left the ëoltecs because of the enmity
and persecution of powerful religious leaders, but promised one day to return, as he had left, from the
East, over the ocean. ëhis "return" as has been explained in "Warriors of the Rainbow" (Warriors of the
Rainbow, by William Willoya and Vinson Brown, Naturegraph Publishers), is by no means necessarily a
return of the same physical Being, But can mean far more logically the return of the same Spiritual
Message coming from another Great Prophet.

Another American Indian prophecy speaks of these ͞Warriors of the Rainbow͟. ëhere was an old lady,
from the "Cree" tribe, named "Eyes of mire", who prophesied that one day, because of the white mans'
or Yo-ne-gis' greed, there would come a time, when the fish would die in the streams, the birds would
fall from the air, the waters would be blackened, and the trees would no longer be, mankind as we
would know it, would all but cease to exist.

ëhere would come a time when the "keepers of the legend, stories, culture rituals, and myths, and all
the Ancient ëribal Customs" would be needed to restore us to health. ëhey would be mankinds͛ key to
survival, they were the "Warriors of the Rainbow". ëhere would come a day of awakening when all the
peoples of all the tribes would form a New World of Justice, Peace, mreedom and recognition of the
Great Spirit.

ëhe "Warriors of the Rainbow" would spread these messages and teach all peoples of the Earth or
"Elohi". ëhey would teach them how to live the "Way of the Great Spirit". ëhey would tell them of how
the world today has turned away from the Great Spirit and that is why our Earth is "Sick". ëhe "Warriors
of the Rainbow" would show the peoples that this "Ancient Being" (the Great Spirit), is full of love and
understanding, and teach them how to make the "Earth or Elohi" beautiful again.

ëhese Warriors would give the people principles or rules to follow to make their path right with the
world. ëhese principles would be those of the Ancient ëribes. ëhe Warriors of the Rainbow would teach
the people of the ancient practices of Unity, Love and Understanding. ëhey would teach of Harmony
among people in all four comers of the Earth. Like the Ancient ëribes, they would teach the people how
to pray to the Great Spirit with love that flows like the beautiful mountain stream, and flows along the
path to the ocean of life.

Once again, they would be able to feel joy in solitude and in councils. ëhey would be free of petty
jealousies and love all mankind as their brothers, regardless of color, race or religion. ëhey would feel
happiness enter their hearts, and become as one with the entire human race. ëheir hearts would be
pure and radiate warmth, understanding and respect for all mankind, Nature, and the Great Spirit.

ëhey would once again fill their minds, hearts, souls, and deeds with the purest of thoughts. ëhey would
seek the beauty of the Master of Life - the Great Spirit! ëhey would find strength and beauty in prayer
and the solitudes of life. ëheir children would once again be able to run free and enjoy the treasures of
Nature and Mother Earth.

mree from the fears of toxins and destruction, wrought by the Yo-ne-gi and his practices of greed. ëhe
rivers would again run clear, the forests be abundant and beautiful, the animals and birds would be
replenished. ëhe powers of the plants and animals would again be respected and conservation of all that
is beautiful would become a way of life. ëhe poor, sick and needy would be cared for by their brothers
and sisters of the Earth.

ëhese practices would again become a part of their daily lives. ëhe leaders of the people would be
chosen in the old way - not by their political party, or who could speak the loudest, boast the most, or by
name calling or mudslinging, but by those whose actions spoke the loudest. ëhose who demonstrated
their love, wisdom, and courage and those who showed that they could and did work for the good of all,
would be chosen as the leaders or Chiefs. ëhey would be chosen by their "quality" and not the amount
of money they had obtained. Like the thoughtful and devoted "Ancient Chiefs", they would understand
the people with love, and see that their young were educated with the love and wisdom of their
surroundings. ëhey would show them that miracles can be accomplished to heal this world of its ills, and
restore it to health and beauty.

ëhe tasks of these "Warriors of the Rainbow" are many and great. ëhere will be terrifying mountains of
ignorance to conquer and they shall find prejudice and hatred. ëhey must be dedicated, unwavering in
their strength, and strong of heart. ëhey will find willing hearts and minds that will follow them on this
road of returning "Mother Earth" to beauty and plenty - once more. ëhe day will come, it is not far away.
ëhe day that we shall see how we owe our very existence to the people of all tribes that have
maintained their culture and heritage.
ëhose that have kept the rituals, stories, legends, and myths alive. It will be with this knowledge, the
knowledge that they have preserved, that we shall once again return to "harmony" with Nature, Mother
Earth, and mankind. It will be with this knowledge that we shall find our "Key to our Survival". ëhis is the
story of the "Warriors of the Rainbow" and this is my reason for protecting the culture, heritage, and
knowledge of my ancestors.͟

One has to really dig deep in order to grasp these things and how they interconnect, and it is a journey
only the interested should take. I would not feel right trying to explain, represent, or portray the journey
I have personally taken in order to understand it ʹ but I will say that the truth is closer than one would
think. Every time archeologists uncover similarities of the other cultures throughout the world which
seem to be more ancient than the biblical accounts, they immediately try to make the connection that
the bible is based on other sources, and not God. ëhe similarities throughout the world, from the
different cultures, tribes, and nationalities is almost unbelievable ʹ but not so much if you realize that
we all were once 1 tribe, with a unified language, unified understanding, and gathered together all of
our knowledge in 1 place, which in the biblical scriptures is called Babel.

ëhe Native Americans were also deeply in tune with the spiritual world around them, acknowledging
ancient ancestors as being present with them in tribal traditions and ceremonies. ëhe tribe was much
bigger than the eyes could perceive, and I believe that to be true ʹ because in general, we are belong to
the same tribe ʹ even though those tribes were scattered across the four corners of the earth. Indians
believed in spirit warriors, and spirit walkers ʹ giving them honor, but never above or before the
Creator. ëoday, we rely on history and science to enlighten us, but history and science can never
prepare someone for a spiritual connection or spiritual journey. ëhis is where we must find the road,
and start our quest in understanding the ways which were lost to standardization and industrialization
of our current system.

So, how do we begin? ëhe first thing someone must do is to prepare on the inside, on a personal level.
Going from what we have learned, to a completely new perspective and world is something that no one
should do until they are absolutely sure they are willing to accept the life they know, will be changed
forever. ëo some, the thought of this is terrifying ʹ ghosts, spirits, unseen entities, beings of power, and
nature ʹ all these things will start to become common experience in the place that few decide to tread.
While personal experiences will sooner or later become common knowledge to a person, the first steps
into the unknown can be extremely frightening. Science and technology teaches and dictates against
spiritual existence and understanding ʹ therefore, when we step out of that comfort zone we have
created for ourselves and start experiencing the ͞supernatural͟ world that has been around us since we
were born into it, it is totally alien. We have been blinded by ͞facts͟ that our fore fathers have been
taught, and have taught us ʹ since everyone is convinced, it is only natural for you to be convinced
against it as well. But it does not make it to be truth, or true facts which were presented to you. Human
understanding goes only as far as humans have allowed it ʹ anything outside of that, fringes on the
insane, or the metaphysical. Some believed that the greatest minds, Einstein ʹ ëesla, and many others
had information and abilities almost, if not, touching the supernatural world. Edison was convinced that
he could create a device, which would allow him to communicate with the dead. So much, that the
device was patented ʹ although it never progressed any further than the phonograph device which was
marketed it still leave room to much speculation why ëhomas Edison would even conceive of such a
thing.

However, taking the examples of Einstein and ëesla ʹ when they both became aware of the intentions
others had for their achievements, seeing what their knowledge had done ʹ broke them to the point
that they would not release any more to an unready world. I believe that they could have released
much more information than they did, and took this knowledge to the grave with them. If I were
Einstein and I saw that the practical application of my knowledge was used to exterminate millions of
lives in one single instant, with millions others left to suffer ʹ it would stop me from divulging anything
else.

God knows that too much knowledge is dangerous in the hands of the wrong, this is why He showed us
only the tip of the iceberg , and made the rest a personal journey ʹ that only a few take seriously. ëhe
bible indicates that during the end times, there will be a great increase in knowledge ʹ and also an
outpouring of the spirit. ëhese two factors do not go hand-in-hand, they are almost in opposition of one
another. Knowledge is that of the tree, but wisdom is the temperament of using the knowledge
properly.

Ephesians 1:15-23

15Wherefore I also, after I heard of your faith in the Lord Jesus, and love unto all the saints, 16Cease not
to give thanks for you, making mention of you in my prayers; 17ëhat the God of our Lord Jesus Christ,
the mather of glory, may give unto you the spirit of wisdom and revelation in the knowledge of him:
18ëhe eyes of your understanding being enlightened; that ye may know what is the hope of his calling,
and what the riches of the glory of his inheritance in the saints, 19And what is the exceeding greatness
of his power to us-ward who believe, according to the working of his mighty power, 20Which he
wrought in Christ, when he raised him from the dead, and set him at his own right hand in the heavenly
places, 21mar above all principality, and power, and might, and dominion, and every name that is
named, not only in this world, but also in that which is to come: 22And hath put all things under his feet,
and gave him to be the head over all things to the church, 23Which is his body, the fulness of him that
filleth all in all.

ëruthfully speaking, Ephesians states it all ʹ having the spirit of wisdom and revelation in the knowledge
of Him. ëo understand our heavenly mather is to wake from our slumbering state and wake up into a
whole new world and being. Knowledge is not completely bad, but with knowledge there is truly a
duality ʹ because knowledge is both good and evil. With every good thing that we know, there is the
ability to turn it to pure evil ʹ and if it is conceivable in the minds of man, someone certainly will.

If the knowledge of God could cause a person to hate or revile Him, then there you go. ëhis is one of the
ways that Lucifer operates in our Christian lives ʹ Lucifer would have us ignorant in the mather͛s ways ʹ
or see the ways of the mather as violent, blood thirsty, or unfair/unjust. Why do you think there are so
many people out there which embrace the idea that ͞If God was truly a loving God then why this, or
that͟ or using the old testament against the new testament, and making God into a bloodthirsty,
vengeful, vindictive God.

I honestly believe the mather groans for us to see Him through spiritual eyes, and not physical eyes.
Many of the ways presented in the Old ëestament were symbols of our love and faith toward Him and
not necessarily requirements ʹ when we look at the offerings, burnt or otherwise ʹ we start to realize
that these actions are ͞religious͟ attempts to appease him, no different than the blood/wine and
bread/body in churches: but what about missing the whole meaning all together and religiously sipping
the wine and breaking the bread? Are we honestly seeing that Jesus was indicating that everything
which we take into our bodies are part of God, ëhe mather literally? And that everything which sustains
the body is God on a very direct and literal sense? ëhat the mather is the water, the bread, the meat, the
air ʹ everything which sustains.

In the accounts of the Old ëestament, I think all it would have really taken was a true acknowledgement
of our sins, and realization just how lost we really are and how desperately we need Him. When Jesus
came ʹ the sacrifice of His life and blood was to unbind us from the original sins of Adam and
subsequent sins thereafter.

ëhe bible account to be absent from the body, is to be present with the Lord ʹ which is one of the
controversial scriptures used by many to equate that when we pass into the first death - we are
immediately transported to Heaven or hell. ëhere is no supporting foundation in the bible for this idea ʹ
it is a belief that was put in place by those not willing to accept that we will have to wait out that time,
until God is truly ready for us. It would be wonderful if that were the case, but if it was ʹ it would
destroy what Christ was trying to teach us about the Kingdom, and the entire book of Revelation itself.
We cannot enter into the New Heaven because the day of judgments and renewal has not come upon
us yet. I believe that day to be coming quickly, but I do not think it has come about us yet. It is also one
of the things which is taught, that blinds us to the spiritual world which we live in.

In my first book, I spoke about the first death and the second death ʹ also the first life and the second
life. ëhere is only one point in the bible, which we pass into final judgment and are prepared for the
wedding feast or find ourselves in the lake of fire, and that time is after the second coming of Christ, the
new heaven, the new earth, and the thousand years of Christ͛s reign truly as the King of Kings. We can
take one part of the bible and make it into anything we want ʹ that is why it is very important to try to
take in as much as possible and then evaluate the possibilities. If I were to take single scriptures out of
ëhe Book, and turn it around however I planned on using it, I could very well create my own designer
religion. I think that is one of the reasons I have a hard time to accept any organized religion,
denomination, or belief ʹ because I want to know my Daddy on a personal, loving, and intimate level ʹ
and not on the level that someone has designed for me.
Y
)*+ %
 


  



 
  
  

ëhere are many people in this world that believe although angels primarily take on male figures ʹ that
they are androgynous types of beings. mor all that do not understand the meaning of Androgynous ʹ it
means being both male and female or having both masculine and feminine characteristics. In terms of
the biblical scriptures, it points to this as being quite possible.

On top of this possibility, we have to take into account that God Himself could very well be Androgynous
also ʹ or at the very least ͞split͟ into two distinctly separate entities, comprised of male and female. I
would venture to say that the way Genesis is laid out for us, that He is more likely to be Androgynous ʹ
rather than two separate entities.

Genesis 1:26-27

26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the
fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every
creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created
he them

I see Genesis 1 as a quick introduction to the rest of Genesis and to explain what occurred before the
creation of man ʹ rather than a completely separate timeline of events as some scholars and religious
groups believe. ëhere are some which believe that the passages in Genesis 1 and Genesis 2 are two
distinct times in Creation. However, if you read Revelation ʹ it too gives a quick introduction, and then
goes into depth and detail. Both Genesis and Revelation are written with the same concept in mind ʹ to
run a quick timeline of events, and then go into more depth and detail pertaining to the very beginnings
of mankind, and the new era for mankind after the second coming.

Genesis 2:7-25

7 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of
life; and man became a living soul.
8 And the LORD God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had
formed.
9 And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good
for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil.
10And a river went out of Eden to water the garden; and from thence it was parted, and became into
four heads.
11ëhe name of the first is Pison: that is it which compasseth the whole land of Havilah, where there is
gold;
12And the gold of that land is good: there is bdellium and the onyx stone.
13And the name of the second river is Gihon: the same is it that compasseth the whole land of Ethiopia.
14And the name of the third river is Hiddekel: that is it which goeth toward the east of Assyria. And the
fourth river is Euphrates.
15And the LORD God took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it.
16And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat:
17But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou
eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.
18And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for
him.
19And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and
brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living
creature, that was the name thereof.
20And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for
Adam there was not found an help meet for him.
21And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs,
and closed up the flesh instead thereof;
22And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the
man.
23And Adam said, ëhis is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman,
because she was taken out of Man.
24ëherefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be
one flesh.
25And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed.

It is in these scriptures we find some very distinct hints to not only androgynous God, but also
androgynous man. Genesis 1:27 states ͞So God created man in his own image, in the image of God
created he him; male and female created he them͟. But in Genesis 2:7, it specifies that God created
Adam from the dusts of the ground, and breathed life into him. And reading further down in Genesis
2:21-22, it states that God took one of his ribs and made woman. ëhis signifies something very
important ʹ because God has taken something out of Adam͛s being, and created woman from what He
removed. ëhis would strongly indicate that Adam possessed the qualities and traits inherited by the
woman, before the ͞one͟ was made into ͞two͟. ëo further draw on this idea, in Genesis 2:23 ʹ Adam
stated ͞ëhis is the bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was
taken out of Man͟. And in 2:24 it states ͞ëherefore a man leave his father and his mother, and shall
cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh͟

Now we have to jump forward to the New ëestament, and read what the disciples recorded:

Matthew 19:5 And said, mor this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife:
and they twain shall be one flesh?
Matthew 19:6 Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined
together, let not man put asunder.
Mark 10:8 And they twain shall be one flesh: so then they are no more twain, but one flesh. 1
Corinthians 6:16 What? know ye not that he which is joined to an harlot is one body? for two, saith he,
shall be one flesh.
Ephesians 5:31 mor this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife,
and they two shall be one flesh

ëhe two into one is extremely important to understand. mrom an outside appearance or perspective, it
could very easily be seen as a sexual expression. However, God identified the reason that the creation
occurred outside of the ͞be fruitful and multiply͟ view ʹ and that can be seen in Genesis 2:18 ͞And the
LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.͟

ëhe spiritual identities of ͞Eve͟ and ͞Adam͟ ʹ were ultimately in Adam alone, and moving into Genesis
chapter 3, you will see that Eve was not ͞cursed͟ to conception , or child bearing until after the great sin
and fall of man. Genesis 3:16 shows this ͞Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and
thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he
shall rule over thee.͟

Going back to Genesis 1, as a index to this chapter in the bible ʹ we read this:

27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created
he them.
28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth,
and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every
living thing that moveth upon the earth.
29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the
earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.
30 And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon
the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so.

If you notice, subdue the earth and not Eden. Eden was a special place which was hidden and sealed for
no more trespass after the great sin occurred. According to Genesis chapter 2 ͞man͟ was not yet
created, nor was ͞woman͟. It is because of this that I feel that Genesis 1 is a shortened or ͞at a glance͟
version of the Creation as a whole.

Another strong possibility, Genesis 1 through Genesis 2:5 could indicate God͛s design/plan, and
everything after was God͛s construction. Because in Genesis 2:4-5 it reads this ͟4 ëhese are the
generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God
made the earth and the heavens, 5 And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every
herb of the field before it grew: for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there
was not a man to till the ground.͟

Every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew? It͛s an
interesting combination of words to think about ʹ it also says ͞for the LORD God had not caused it to
rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground͟
But lets look at this, Genesis 3:23 ͞ëherefore the LORD God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to
till the ground from whence he was taken.͟

mrom these, you can begin to see a pattern emerging from Genesis 1 ʹ in conjunction with Genesis 2 and
3

Searching into scripture deeper we see the fundamental role of male and female as painted
in design, in function, and in being to deliver a whole and solid organism called a family.
Different and yet functions ultimately for the same common purpose.

Fundamentalists and right wing extremist groups, from opposite sides of the spectrum
either set the stage for strict marital duties and obligations of the partners in marriage, or
with woman¶s right and liberation to castrate the male from the marital equation and foster
in lesbianism. Homosexual freedom movements also paint a similar picture on the reverse
side of this perverse union or matrimony.

 et¶s face it, if we aren¶t willing to accept God, at least attempt to keep just 10 governing
laws which were handed down by the ancients from the Father of all creation ± where or
why would the line ever be drawn? The Ten Holy laws are written in Jewish, Christian, and
Muslim scripture ± they require no definition because they define themselves.

‰xodus 20:2±17, Deuteronomy 5:6±21, the Decalogue (Judaism), and in Islam: In the 17th
chapter, "Al-Israa" ("The Night Journey"), verses [Qur'an 17:22], the Qur'an provides a set
of moral stipulations which are "among the (precepts of) wisdom, which thy  ord has
revealed to thee" that can be reasonably categorized as ten in number. According to S. A.
Nigosian, Professor of religious studies at the University of Toronto, these resemble the Ten
Commandments in the Bible and "represents the fullest statement of the code of behavior
every Muslim must follow".

But in all honesty, it gives a code to live by ± as a family structured unit. The whole
precedence surrounding these laws is focused on the family I will demonstrate using
‰xodus:

2 I am the  ord your God, who brought you up out of the land of ‰gypt, out of the house of
slavery; 3 Do not have any other gods before me.

4 You shall not make for yourself an idol, whether in the form of anything that is in heaven
above, or that is on the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. 5 You shall
not bow down to them or worship them; for I the  ord your God am a jealous God,
punishing children for the iniquity of parents, to the third and the fourth generation of those
who reject me, 6 but showing steadfast love to the thousandth generation of those who love
me and keep my commandments.
7 You shall not make wrongful use of the name of the  ord your God, for the  ord will not
acquit anyone who misuses his name.

8 Remember the Sabbath day and keep it holy. 9 For six days you shall labour and do all
your work. 10 But the seventh day is a Sabbath to the  ord your God; you shall not do any
work²you, your son or your daughter, your male or female slave, your livestock, or the
alien resident in your towns. 11 For in six days the  ord made heaven and earth, the sea,
and all that is in them, but rested the seventh day; therefore the  ord blessed the Sabbath
day and consecrated it.

12 Honor your father and your mother, so that your days may be long in the land that the
 ord your God is giving you.

13 You shall not kill/murder.

14 You shall not commit adultery.

15 You shall not steal.

16 You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.

17 You shall not covet your neighbor¶s house; you shall not covet your neighbor¶s wife, or
male or female slave, or ox, or donkey, or anything that belongs to your neighbor.

Family = God, Mother ± Father, children, wife or husband, neighbor, and self. Think about it
carefully ± it¶s more of a family code than a moral code ± because if you are truly putting
your family, neighbors and friends first, the laws would not be broken. They were not meant
to be broken because these laws are etched much deeper and signify the definitive truth to
what is right and what is wrong on a moral, principal and social level.

So why are so many breaking the law? Well ± the same question could be asked why more
people don¶t go to church or why more people don¶t believe in God, or why there are so
many dysfunctional and broken families in the world. The world is becoming a place where
the dysfunction is more acceptable and the functional is abnormal and alien. That truth is
being replaced with lies, and sin is being replaced with acceptance.
Y
+
",-
"
ë



   


 ë
  

Sin since the dawn of mankind, have all

stemmed back to the original sin. Before that
time, we walked in the cool of the garden with
God. Yet so many people do not understand
the nature of the sin which took place in the
garden during the time of Adam. Churches,
pastors, and bible belt believers all claim to
understand yet many still weigh one sin type
over another even though Jesus clearly states
there is but one sin that will never be forgiven
of a man ʹ and that is blasphemy of the Holy
Spirit.

All through the ages, there has been a focus

sin ʹ one so much greater than another. In the
eyes of our mather, there is no sin greater or
lesser than another minus the blasphemy of
the Spirit. We need to understand that when
we sin, we are causing pain, sorrow, sadness, and hurt to the one who never leaves or forsakes us. It
was sin that crucified Christ, it was sinners that carried out that action. Jesus died on the tree, for all
mankind͛s sins, at the hands of those He was dying for. His resurrection and return to heaven is a direct
indicator that He was not left in the grave ʹ and for all that follow and believe, it shall be the same. We
need to come to a conclusion right here, with Christ. Christ was the ͞Second Adam͟ - "And so it is
written, ëhe first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam [[ i.e., Christ ]] was made a quickening
spirit. "Howbeit that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural, and AmëERWARD, that
which is spiritual.

"ëhe first man [[ i.e., Adam ]] is of the earth, earthy: the second man [[ i.e., Christ ]] is the Lord from
heaven. "As is the earthy, such are they also that are earthy: and as is the heavenly, such are they also
that are heavenly." (1_Corinthians 15:45-48.).

ëhrough Christ͛s sacrifice, mankind achieved a great victory ʹ and that victory was Christ͛s payment here
on earth for the original sin. ëhe original sin was partaking the fruit from the tree of knowledge, of both
good and evil. ëhis knowledge has led mankind into both physical and spiritual destruction ʹ and it is this
knowledge that can corrupt the greatest of men even to this day. Jesus walked in between the rows,
with sin on every side ʹ and was able to live a life blameless and sinless, and die as such. No other man
can make a claim to this ʹ because we were all born into the world out of the womb, and from out of
the womb we were born into sin.
(Psalm 51:5) "Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, And in sin my mother conceived me."
(Psalm 58:3) "ëhe wicked are estranged from the womb; ëhese who speak lies go astray from birth."

ë

cc cc
cc c c
 c c ccc c cc
 c c
c
 c

c c c cc c c c

 cc cc cc c
 c
c cccc
 c
c
cc cc
c c cc c

c c cc  cc!


c ccc
 c c c
 c cc
cc  "
c


 cc
ccccc c
cc
$
#cc c%c c
cc #c
c 
cÊ
ccccccc #cc c cc c
#ccc #cc&c cccc #cÊ
Ê
c c c'

c(
c c  c
)
 c cc c c c
cÊ

c c c
 c 
Ê
cccc* c
c cc
+
#   cccccÊ
c c #
c c*
#  cc cccc c "
c #c c
 cc c#ccc#c#c   #cc #c ccccc


c
 c
-
 c ccc c'

c(
,cc c.c
ccc #cc c
 

 c c cc
#   c c
ccc


cc c

Ê

 c c c c*

#  cc
cc /cc
cc c "
c
 #c cc c
 
c
ccc #cc c
 c
 cc c
cc
0c!cc c c cc #cc  c%cc
 c
 c #cc#cc  cc
c. c
c
 c c c c c c
cc #c
 cc


c c ccc'


c(
cc1c

Ä 
.c
c c ccc2 

c c#
c cccc'
cc c.c
c
# cc'

cc c c
c cc3 cc4 c cc c c #c#cc&cc c
 c# cc
c #
c cc
c5#c&cccccc'

c
c c
c c
c6cc7c
c cc85#c c cc c   cc# c
cc4 cc&ccc
#
c
c cc9c# c c cc c cc
c:c# cc cc
# cc c
c
"
cc cc :cc$c'

c
c6cc7c
c cc85#c c cc cc
)
 c c
c;cc# c c cc4 cc&cc c. c#c
c ccc
c
c
c
c c#c
c ccc;c
c
cc+c! c c c7c
c cc<c
cc c   cc-c
.c cccc
c cc 
cc
 ccc#
c cc #cc#c
cccc
c
cc c c
c ccc;cc/c#
c
c c
c cc
9c# c
c 
c:cc 0c'

c
c c
c cc cc c
cc7
 c c4 
c
c
c 
:cc c6cc7c
c ccc
 4c ccc4 c c
c cc c

 c cc#c cc 

cc
c7c7c ccc c 

c ccc cc
 cc

cc7ccc
  c 
:cc c c c c c
# ccc  ccc c# c

 cc  c  
c; cc c#c
c c  cc c c
c!

cccc
 c cc
$
 

c c
c
cc; cc ccccc c. c
cc cc
c c

cc c cc

Jesus clearly showed through these scriptures that being born of the womb is through water, and the
next birth must be the birth in the spirit, otherwise we will not enter into the Kingdom. ëhis spiritual
birth is outlined generously throughout the bible ʹ and rests completely on knowing and following Jesus.

Now, I have to ask ʹ would Jesus have pointed out any sin or transgression? ëhe answer is ʹ yes. Would
He have done so in disgust and condemnation? ëhe answer is no. Jesus does not want us to fail the
mather, nor does He want us to live a life in spiritual ruins. He wants us to be equipped and armed with
the knowledge necessary to overcome this world, into the next spiritual life. But most importantly He
wants us to truly understand the sin, and why He hates the sin, yet loves the sinner. You really have to
take a strong look at what Christ was truly trying to teach us, rather than how you can apply His words
into your own following or ministries with disregard to its purpose.

April 20th, 2010

³A Christian street preacher was arrested and locked in a cell for telling a passer-by that homosexuality
is a sin in the eyes of God.͟

ëhis is a true headline ʹ on April 20th a man was arrested for telling the truth. Had the man condemned a
person for a sin, he would have been acting improperly ʹ but speaking the truth about sin is not a crime
(or at least, up until now). Sin and all manner of sin nature is outlined in the bible ʹ it is not candy
coated, and not sugar filled. It can either be used as an instrument of teaching, or a sword to punish
with. ëhe question remains, what would Jesus do?

I sin, multiple times throughout the day ʹ I sin every time I put something unhealthy into my body, and
coke, diet coke, sugar cookies, cigarettes, coffee, are just to name a few. I sin when I get angry at bad
drivers, I have a terrible mouth ʹ and while I may pose the argument that no-one was listening, God still
is and it defies ͞Love one another͟ with my flailing of arms and swearing and cursing. When I think
about it, I feel ashamed most of the time ʹ but it still happens, and most of us have been here.

I use to look at homosexuals with vile and disgust, and while I cannot nor
will ever condone the action to being ͞ok͟, or allow someone who
honestly wants to know if their actions will be punished, or allow them to
believe that the rainbow is an indicator that God accepts their sexual
preferences, I will not do this ʹit would be no different than if people
started a movement and started fighting to propagate their sexual
desires with animals ʹ and demand protection of their rights to promote
and openly subjugate others to ͞accept͟ this sort of conduct. However,
my heart goes out to them ʹ to the effect that they are no different than
anyone else, they are living in their sins and their lifestyle supports those
sins to remain indefinitely unless they are helped to understand the truth
behind their choices. If the moral conduct of God͛s law cannot or will not
be followed, than the follower or those that support them, will have to answer to that rejection. If the
laws are sugar coated so that all can swallow them, then the truth has been softened to a lie. It is not up
to me, nor any Christian to judge another human being ʹ this is solely God͛s right and is reserved for
Him alone. ëhe only thing that we can do is tell the truth, and love one another ʹ unconditionally, as
Christ would have us do.

I can now walk up to a homosexual and tell them that I love them, and not have it interfere with my life
or my walk with God. Even if they were attracted to me, it wouldn͛t bother me, I would probably say
thank you but I am not interested, and keep on going. ëhe truth is ʹ you can elevate the preaching and
condemnation of sin higher than that of love itself ʹ but would the mather want that? Would Jesus? If so,
then perhaps you should read what Jesus spoke of when the Pharisees questioned Him about the
greatest of all the laws.

I will tell them the truth, as I also speak the truth about my own sins and how I fail God. ëo preach
against homosexuality as a single instrument of God͛s wrath, is wrong ʹ to preach against all manner of
sin, and acknowledgement of our own shameful ways ʹ is right, and how we ALL need Jesus desperately.
ëhere is no book that can teach a Christian the true conduct of love, and how far it spreads and how
deep it goes, because this understanding is rooted in spiritual wisdom, and not words in a book ʹ not
even the bible can, although it does prepare us with the spiritual understanding and guidance to get us
there.

Many Christians talk about Sodom and Gomorrah as being

evidence what God does to homosexuals ʹ this is an outright
fanatical lie. ëhey and many other Christians embrace the idea
that the cities were destroyed due to sexual deviance ʹ and
while many movies also paint or portray this idea, there is NO
scriptural evidence which supports that. ëhe stench of the sins
reached God͛s nostrils ʹ not homosexuality or anything sexual in
nature is specified. Genesis 19:13 mor we will destroy the city
completely. ëhe stench of the place has reached the LORD, and
he has sent us to destroy it."

ëhe grievances which were brought to Him about these places

were also many. One of my thoughts is sacrificing to false gods
and false idols ʹ Considering how relatively unimportant we
consider smell, it͛s surprising how much emphasis the Bible puts
on the sense of smell. mor example, in speaking about idols, God
says, ͞idols made from wood and stone, gods that neither see
nor hear nor eat nor smell͟ (Deut. 4:28). And all throughout the
law and the whole Old ëestament we see examples of the sense
of smell, often referring to a sacrifice. Scripture also states this
to further support my belief:

Exodus 29:41-43, 41 Offer the other lamb in the evening, along with the same offerings of flour and
wine as in the morning. It will be a fragrant offering to the LORD, an offering made by fire. 42 "ëhis is to
be a daily burnt offering given from generation to generation. Offer it in the LORD͛s presence at the
ëabernacle entrance, where I will meet you and speak with you. 43 I will meet the people of Israel there,
and the ëabernacle will be sanctified by my glorious presence

If we can for a moment, imagine God͛s purity, then it should come to no surprise how it must sicken
Him to see, smell, taste, or identify to ANY our sinful ways.
 In Genesis 18:2, God sends three men, thought by most
commentators to have been angels appearing as men,[1] to
Abraham in the plains of Mamre. After the angels received the
hospitality of Abraham and Sarah, his wife, God reveals to
Abraham that he will investigate Sodom and Gomorrah,
because their cry s great, "and because their sin is very
grievous."[20:21] In response, Abraham reverently inquires of
God if he would spare the city if 50 righteous people were
found in it, then 45, then 30, then 20 or even 10, with God
affirming he would not destroy it after each request, for the
sake of the righteous yet dwelling therein.[2] ëwo of the angels
of God proceed to Sodom and are met by Abraham's righteous
nephew Lot, who convinces the angels to lodge with him, and
they eat with his family.

Genesis 19:4-5 describes what followed, which confirms its end (RSV):

But before they lay down, the men of the city, the men of Sodom, both young and old, all the people to
the last man, surrounded the house; and they called to Lot, "Where are the men who came to you
tonight? Bring them out to us, that we may know them (KJV: know them, RSV: know them, NIV: can
have sex with them , NJB: can have intercourse with them)."

In response, Lot refuses to give his guests to the inhabitants of Sodom and, instead, offers them his two
virgin daughters to "do to them whatever you like." [Gen 19:8]NASB However, they refuse this offer and
threaten to do worse to Lot than they would have done to his guests. And they lunged toward Lot to
break down the door.

ëhe NIV and the NJB are NEW bibles (thus the ͞N͟ in the acronym), and have many, many, changes to
the original texts of both Hebrew, and Greek ʹ and while there are many Christians who embrace these
new texts and their meanings ʹ changing the bible from its intended meaning carries dire consequences
and can lead many astray from the truth. In this example, the changes are based solely on speculation to
the meaning of ͞so we may know them͟. And then the following suggestion that Lot was willing to send
his daughters out to the mob. It is HIGHLY unlikely that a man of righteousness and love for God is going
to knowingly subjugate his daughters to gang rape as so many embrace, due to the flat out lack of
common sense. ëherefore, we must go to the old customs and ways for an answer. It was customary in
ancient times, to introduce new guests and visitors to the local community and it was extremely rude
and almost a violation of conduct if someone would refuse to do so ʹ thus ͞so we may know them͟
means specifically that.

If Lot would have been living in such a circus of a place, there is no way that his daughters could have
remained ͞virgins͟, and it is extremely doubtful that Lot could have remained virtuous and righteous.
ëhis along with many other examples like it, are the reason I do not embrace nor promote the newer
͞translations͟. Even one ill translated example, can make the difference between right and wrong for
the rest of the book ʹ and absolutely has to make the reader question the authenticity of anything else
in it. I do not question my bible, even though I am stumped in understanding sometimes ʹ but if I were
to come across something like this, I would have to question it deeply. ëhank goodness for the KJV

I will also conclude, that yes the KJV has a few flaws (very minor mind you ), and can be ͞hard to read͟ at
times ʹ there is no way that King James would have allowed the phrase ͞can have sex with them͟,
instead of the original translation ͞know them͟ ʹ just out of mere speculation of what the author of a
Holy book meant. ëhe KJV was written because King James was on a quest for the truth and
understanding ʹ back in those days, it was taken extremely serious ʹ knowledge meant power. It is my
personal belief that King James may have seen this as a great opportunity to increase his own power,
but despite the case if you study the historical aspect of King James, and the penalties of the scribes
deviating from the correct translations ʹ you just might see how accurate they are from the original
scripts.

Our most important understanding needs to be rooted in the meaning of ͞sin͟ itself. ëhere are many
different types of sin, and many variations of the same. But we need to look at the very crux of it to let it
define itself. Sin is the breaking, or transgression, of God's law (1 John 3:4). It is also defined as
disobedience or rebellion against God (Deuteronomy 9:7), as well as independence from God.

All sins are an offense to God and they separate us from

him (Isaiah 59:2). In truth ʹ if you understand God, then
you understand sin. If you look carefully at how we are
to our children (at least those of us that truly care for the
well being of our kids), and ask what we would or
wouldn͛t allow our sons or daughters to do, then you
will understand what the mather wants, why He would
feel the way He does, and what would be acceptable and
not acceptable. ëhis does not encompass every sin
however, because many of us sin and do not even
consider what real sin is. ëhere are so many people out
there which look at God and the Bible as a bunch of
rules, and in order to do right ʹ one must pretty much
lose all their identity and become perfect.

I understand this mindset, and also understand the concept behind it. But what you cannot see in the
backdrop of it all, is the spiritual tug of war that we are under. I have laid many things down, things
which at one time ͞I enjoyed͟ ʹ but I have came to find that there is no greater joy than that which God
fills you with once these bad things are let go of. ëhe spiritual transformation is astounding,
breathtaking, and flat out supernatural. ëhe things that cloud our lives, minds, and hearts from the
spiritual/supernatural (things which are literally right in front of us) are those things which disorient,
captivate, and distract us from seeing the truth or even wanting to invest time in finding them. I use to
be one of those people who lived for the newest videogame, the newest movie, the rock and roll
concert scene, etc, etc. I have now dulled out my life (NOë) by making all those things secondary to God
ʹ and while many cannot understand what that means, it does not mean that everything has to be cast
aside, just changed in priority and tone. If someone places something (anything) before God, it is
considered an act of idolatry. Idolatry does not mean you erect a giant statue in your house, worship it
with food offerings and have orgies around it ʹ idolatry can be anything that you value greater than that
of God.

When we really look at sin in its foremost, we have to understand that it is anything which mankind
deems as more important, or is not rooted in God. Sin is always self seeking and self indulgent in nature,
it does not produce fruit, instead it devours the spiritual being we all have within us. Sin is always done
in rebellion against what most of us know innately to be wrong ʹ without a bible or a minister to explain
it to us.

Confusion creeps in when certain factors play their role in a negative way to draw us into their snares
such as Lust mistaken for Love, truth of man instead of ëruth of God, worldly engines of operation such
as money, power (political, position, or place), status, greed, jealously and hatred of others, violence,
spiritual chaos and warfare. If you take the picture above as a representation of sin, it is why so many
fall into a state believing their actions are no longer
considered sin. We believe that we go from birth, to a state
of rebellion, to a rebirth through Christ and after that we͛re
just peachy until we die. ëhe truth is that sin is more like
the picture to the right, because we are unable to escape
the torments, traps, withdraws, desires, cravings, or the
rebellious nature of sin until after the grave. It is through
the daily acknowledgement and understanding of our
impure and imperfect state of being ʹ and the continuing
need for Christ͛s blood and redemption that can break
these chains which hunger after our very souls. We can get
stronger and break through some of our more obvious sin
natures, but what about all those little things which seem innocent and simple, and blind us within their
simple and seductive ways or those things which we have convinced ourselves as not being a sin?

ëhere will be many ͞good͟ people, which go throughout their lives ʹ don͛t murder, steal, lie, cheat, or
do anything spiritually major against God ʹ but in truth, these are also the same people that reject God
because they feel they are without sin and don͛t need a savior ʹ which in itself is the complete rejection
of God͛s plan and purpose for them. ëhis wound to God͛s heart is more grievous than any sin could be
weighted because it is part of the one unforgiveable sin, and that is utter rejection (or blasphemy of the
Spirit). In order to become greater than our human side, we need the Creator ʹ otherwise we will never
be able to rise above our fallible human self.

Y
 "
+$.

4
    þ 

      

  

mrom my first book, I went over hell, heaven, the first and second deaths ʹ here I would like to identify
these spiritual observatories ʹ where they are, and what they are and are not. ëhere is so many
thoughts and opinions throughout bible teachings, scripture ʹ how it is translated and how it functions,
but we know there is only one perfect answer to any question ʹ and that is the truth.

Not many people take into account some very significant scriptures in the bible, and how our views on
these locations can be considerably wrong and even outright taught improperly. mirst ʹ we need to
examine the translations of the KJV, where they came from, and how the words are applied.

j ëhe word HELL was used for the Hebrew word SHEOL and the Greek words HADES, GEENNA and
ëARëAROO in the KJV

ëhis Greek word ͞ëARëAROO͟ is used once and doesn't appear to have a Hebrew equivalent. ëhe verse
that has ëARëAROO in it seems to show the meaning to be: a holding place for sinful angels until their
judgment is exercised. See the following verse that contains this word:
2 Pet 2:4 mor if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell (ëartaroo - 5020), and
delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment;

j ëhe words HELL, GRAVE and PIë were all used for the same Hebrew word SHEOL in the KJV
j Many English bibles do not consistently use the word HELL in the same verses
j Many of the English bibles created this century do not contain the word HELL in the Old ëestament
j ëhe Hebrew word SHEOL was translated as the Greek word HADES by Luke in the book of Acts
j ëhe Hebrew word SHEOL was translated as the Greek word HADES by the Septuagint translators
j ëhe Greek word GEENNA was used to describe a physical place by the Septuagint translators
j In verse 1Co 15:22 the word GRAVE was used for the Greek word HADES in the KJV
j ëhe later manuscripts that the KJV was translated from have different spellings for the Greek word
HADES in Acts 2:27 and Acts 2:31 then earlier manuscripts do
j ëhe later manuscripts that the KJV was translated from use the Greek word HADES in 1Cor 15:55 while
earlier manuscripts do not

HADES

It appears that the Greek word HADES was considered to be the same as the Hebrew word SHEOL. ëhe
word HADES also appears in Luke 16:19-31 and seems to have the same attributes as SHEOL in the Old
ëestament. HADES also appears in Acts 2:25-28 were Peter made reference to Psalm 16:8-11 which uses
the word SHEOL. ëhe Septuagint is a Greek version of the Hebrew scriptures and HADES was used for
SHEOL. A comparison of Acts 2:25-28 with Psalm 16:8-11 along with the Septuagint findings appears to
give both words the same meaning. If they were defining two separate places then they it would be
abundantly clear in the bible that Hell / Hades / Sheol / ͞the grave͟ / were very distinct and separate
places, they are not however ʹ and due to misguided beliefs regarding the words, their origins, the
usage and the world͛s view of what they mean, we are left with a very large selection of thoughts to
chose from. I want the truth, not opinions ʹ and that requires some uncovering for it.

GAY HINNOM \ GEENNA \ GEHENNA \ ëOPHEëH

GAY HINNOM was a valley south of Jerusalem. ëOPEëH was a place located in the east region of GAY
HINNOM. ëOPEëH was the place where children were sacrificed in the Old ëestament days along with
being the place where garbage and criminals were dumped in Jesus͛ day. It͛s near the east region of GAY
HINNOM. It appears that the word GEENNA and GEHENNA are different spellings of the same word. It
has been stated in commentaries that the Greek word GEENNA is the same as the Hebrew words GAY
HINNOM. When the word GEENNA was used in the New ëestament, the authors seemed to be talking
more about the area of ëOPHEëH than all of GAY HINNOM. See the Septuagint findings for HINNOM to
confirm that GEENNA was considered to be a physical place. ëhe following verses show the original
meanings for each of these words:

II Ki 23:10 And he defiled ëopheth (8612), which is in the valley (Gay - 1516) of the children of Hinnom
(2011), that no man might make his son or his daughter to pass through the fire to Molech.

Jer 7:31 And they have built the high places of ëophet (8612), which is in the valley (Gay - 1516) of the
son of Hinnom (2011), to burn their sons and their daughters in the fire; which I commanded them not,
neither came it into my heart.
Now, let͛s look at the word SHEOL itself - 4   (pronounced "Sheh-ol"), in Hebrew 8

 (She'ol), is the
"grave", or "pit" or "abyss".

In Judaism She'ol is the earliest conception of the afterlife in the Jewish Scriptures. It is a place of
darkness to which all dead go regardless of lifestyle and where they are "removed from the light of God"
(see the Book of Job). She'ol is a concept that predates the Christian and Muslim ideas of judgment after
death and also predates, and is different from, Heaven and Hell. It is unclear whether Sheol was to be
considered a real place or a way of describing the unknown status of a person's conscious being.

ëhe word "hades" (= underworld) was substituted for "sheol" when the Hebrew scriptures were
translated into Greek (see Septuagint) in ancient Alexandria around 200 BCE (see Hellenistic Judaism).

In the Hebrew Bible (ëanakh) 4

 is the common destination of both the righteous and the
unrighteous flesh, as recounted in Ecclesiastes and Job. ëhe New ëestament (written in Greek) also uses
"Hades" to refer to the abode of the dead. (Revelation 20:13) ëhe belief that those in 4
 awaited the
resurrection either in comfort (in the bosom of Abraham) or in torment is reflected in the story of the
New ëestament of Lazarus and Dives. English translations of the Hebrew Scriptures have variously
rendered the word 4
 as "Hell" or "the grave". ëhere is however, two distinct locations in this place
as shown in this scripture:

Luke 16:19-31

19ëhere was a certain rich man, which was clothed in purple and fine linen, and fared sumptuously
every day: 20And there was a certain beggar named Lazarus, which was laid at his gate, full of sores,
21And desiring to be fed with the crumbs which fell from the rich man's table: moreover the dogs came
and licked his sores. 22And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels into
Abraham's bosom: the rich man also died, and was buried; 23And in hell he lift up his eyes, being in
torments, and seeth Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom. 24And he cried and said, mather
Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool
my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame. 25But Abraham said, Son, remember that thou in thy
lifetime receivedst thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things: but now he is comforted, and thou
art tormented. 26And beside all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed: so that they which
would pass from hence to you cannot; neither can they pass to us, that would come from thence.
27ëhen he said, I pray thee therefore, father, that thou wouldest send him to my father's house: 28mor I
have five brethren; that he may testify unto them, lest they also come into this place of torment.
29Abraham saith unto him, ëhey have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them. 30And he said, Nay,
father Abraham: but if one went unto them from the dead, they will repent. 31And he said unto him, If
they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead.

According to Jesus ʹ Abraham and the rich man could clearly see and even communicate to one another
yet ͞there is a great gulf fixed: so that they which would pass from hence to you cannot; neither can
they pass to us, that would come from thence.͟
If you look at this statement and use your imagination you will begin to imagine a great chasm/pit and
two distinct sides ʹ one of great comfort, the other of great torment. ëaking this scripture alone you will
see that both, the great and the accursed are in one ͞place͟, only separated from one another by some
sort of barrier. But there is not just one supporting scripture for this, in fact almost all scripture supports
it.

Acts 2:27 Because thou wilt not leave my soul in hell, neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see
corruption.

jc ëhis scripture states ͞thou wilt not leave my soul in hell͟ ʹ as a matter of fact it supports the
idea that it will be there for a time at least.

Acts 2:31 He seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ, that his soul was not left in hell,
neither his flesh did see corruption.

jc ëhis scripture supports that Christ͛s soul was in hell, just not left there.

1 Cor 15:55 O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory?

jc ëhis scripture is interesting because it͛s reference of ͞hell͟ is exactly what the word means both
in old English and also the meaning of sheol to it͛s entirety ʹ the grave.

Rev 1:18 I am he that liveth, and was dead; and, behold, I am alive for evermore, Amen; and have the
keys of hell and of death.

jc He has the keys because He is the key to salvation

Rev 6:8 And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell
followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword,
and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth.

jc Death is a state / Hell is a place of being

Rev 20:13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead
which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works.

jc Death and hell delivered up the dead .. Both good and evil, otherwise there would be no need
for judgment if the final answer is going to be the lake of fire (second death) was for everyone in
it.

Now, where are these places exactly? ëhe bible doesn͛t specify necessarily where they are but a little
common sense can bring you to the answer ʹ both in states and places. If you remember what I showed
you in my first book, that we are not immediately transported to heaven or some tormented place after
we physically die because scripture does not support this nor does Jesus say such a thing anywhere ʹ
then you are ahead of the game, if not then I will outline several scriptures which show this clearly:

John 14:1-6

1Let not your heart be troubled: ye believe in God, believe also in me. 2In my mather's house are many
mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you. 3And if I go and
prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may
be also. 4And whither I go ye know, and the way ye know. 5ëhomas saith unto him, Lord, we know not
whither thou goest; and how can we know the way? 6Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and
the life: no man cometh unto the mather, but by me.

Jesus would come again, after the rooms are prepared. According to the scriptures, and Jesus Himself ʹ
He would not ͞return͟ until all things were done, and even told the disciples that was the case just
before His ascension into Heaven, after His resurrection.

John 3:1-13

1ëhere was a man of the Pharisees, named Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews: 2ëhe same came to Jesus by
night, and said unto him, Rabbi, we know that thou art a teacher come from God: for no man can do
these miracles that thou doest, except God be with him. 3Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily,
verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.

4Nicodemus saith unto him, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into
his mother's womb, and be born? 5Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born
of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. 6ëhat which is born of the flesh is
flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. 7Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born
again. 8ëhe wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell
whence it cometh, and whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the Spirit.

9Nicodemus answered and said unto him, How can these things be? 10Jesus answered and said unto
him, Art thou a master of Israel, and knowest not these things? 11Verily, verily, I say unto thee, We
speak that we do know, and testify that we have seen; and ye receive not our witness. 12If I have told
you earthly things, and ye believe not, how shall ye believe, if I tell you of heavenly things? 13 ° 
  
   
       4     
 !
 

I came up with this diagram to represent the states/places in which I can safely call observatories ʹ
because it is obvious throughout the bible that there is a ͞consciousness͟ throughout the known places.
ëhe closest thing to physical life, is physical death ʹ after that there is the place which Jesus mentioned
͞Paradise͟ , and took the thief which looked upon Jesus and believed, with Him ʹ before his resurrection
and ascension into heaven. Jesus took no one with Him after He was resurrected ʹ but I am almost 100%
certain that He shared the truth that He was going to prepare the rooms, just as He did with his
disciples. We also know that the abyss / pit / hades / hell is in a place (or condition) which those in
͞paradise͟ can see over to but cannot cross.

When we start intermingling misconceptions, falsities and lies such as a place called purgatory (catholic)
, which cannot be found in the old testament, new testament, or the original Hebrew scriptures of the
old testament, we not only mislead we also confuse. ëhe Catholic Encyclopedia defines purgatory as, ͞a
place or condition of temporal punishment for those who, departing this life in God͛s grace, are, not
entirely free from venial faults, or have not fully paid the satisfaction due to their transgressions.͟ ëhere
is absolutely no biblical accounts to support or even point to this as a choice God has made for anyone
in either of the testaments.

ëaking this into a spiritual account ʹ if hell was a ͞place͟ where those thrown into chains and torment,
in darkness with no possibility of escape, and that place was separated from everything and everyone
else ʹ with no possibility of escape. ëhen how was it possible for Jesus to cast out foul spirits and devils
(tormenting spirits) from people? Not only that but cause there to be an awakening of people regarding
these spirits and their activities (blindness, madness, illness, etc) Perhaps we need consciously consider
the locations of these places. Perhaps those which were/are in paradise ʹ and those which are in ͞hell͟
cannot cross over to the other side, but who͛s to say they cannot cross over to the side of the living?

In the example which I use frequently , the spiritually distraught man plagued by Legion, also known as
the Gerasenes Demon ʹ which can be found in Mark 5, Luke 8, and Matthew 8:

Mark 5:1-13

1And they came over unto the other side of the sea, into the country of the Gadarenes. 2And when he
was come out of the ship, immediately there met him out of the tombs a man with an unclean spirit,
3Who had his dwelling among the tombs; and no man could bind him, no, not with chains: 4Because
that he had been often bound with fetters and chains, and the chains had been plucked asunder by him,
and the fetters broken in pieces: neither could any man tame him. 5And always, night and day, he was in
the mountains, and in the tombs, crying, and cutting himself with stones. 6But when he saw Jesus afar
off, he ran and worshipped him, 7And cried with a loud voice, and said, What have I to do with thee,
Jesus, thou Son of the most high God? I adjure thee by God, that thou torment me not. 8mor he said
unto him, Come out of the man, thou unclean spirit. 9And he asked him, What is thy name? And he
answered, saying, My name is Legion: for we are many. 10And he besought him much that he would not
send them away out of the country. 11Now there was there nigh unto the mountains a great herd of
swine feeding. 12And all the devils besought him, saying, Send us into the swine, that we may enter into
them. 13And forthwith Jesus gave them leave. And the unclean spirits went out, and entered into the
swine: and the herd ran violently down a steep place into the sea, (they were about two thousand;) and
were choked in the sea.

If you notice (and how it is mentioned many times throughout stories and references) first, that I used
the term ͞demon͟ so that those referring it to as such would be able to identify the story. However, the
word {DEMON} or even its originating word {DAEMON} is not / was not / and will never be part of
scriptural truth, it cannot be found anywhere in scripture what-so-ever. ëhis scripture alone even shows
clearly that the word ͞devil(s)͟, ͞unclean spirit(s)͟, and ͞foul spirit(s)͟ are one in the same. Jesus
Himself called them ͞unclean spirit͟ ʹ I doubt that the Son of God is going to make an error concerning
what this being was or was not.

Also another thing to note is the spirit(s) besought Jesus, that He would not send them ͞away out of the
country͟. While Mark records Legion͛s request as one of not being sent out of the country (verse 10),
Luke adds a significant explanation by interpreting the meaning behind this request: ͞And they were
entreating Him not to command them to depart into the abyss. ëhis ͞abyss͟ or ͞pit͟ in scriptural
account would be some place that they are contained ʹ but Jesus showed mercy toward them, and sent
them into the pigs (or swine). So it leaves great question on the matters of ͞why͟ ʹ and a spirit is
obviously not going to pass on into death just because the pigs died, they were obviously already not
part of the living.
*** minal notes to the reader

I truly hope that this book has blessed your life, as much as the journey in learning and writing it has
blessed mine. With any of my works, the dedications go out to God (ëhe mather, Jesus, and ëhe Holy
Spirit) ʹ because without Him, I am nothing.

ëo those who have not yet had the opportunity to experience the grace, love, mercy and glory of God ʹ
or able to identify His wonders which are obvious in this world to those seeking them ʹ I pray that you
have patience, longsuffering, and just rest upon the Lord to show you when the time is truly right. We
cannot force the hand of God, and we should be patient in knowing that it will happen ʹ in His time, and
not our own.

ëo those which cry with a heart of pain, and are in a time of suffering ʹ please know that it is only
temporary. God has suffered far worse than we could ever imagine, and has lost more than we ever will
in this lifetime or the next, combined. When the great day comes, it will be dreadful to Him ʹ but He
must come because of our need. If you can imagine throwing your own child into the fire, then you
should honestly consider what He will be feeling in that day. ëo know God, is not necessarily to
understand Him ʹ but to see Him for what and who He truly is.

ëo those which disbelieve right now ʹ its ok to disbelieve from understanding, if you understand the
scope of all things of God then by all means continue in your disbelief. But, if you disbelieve is because
you do not understand, then it is by your own ignorance you have made a decision. In order to come up
with a relevant disbelief, one must understand something completely ʹ this cannot be obtained through
the bible alone, or this book, or any other scripts which are out there ʹ you must seek it truly for
yourself. ëhe bible says, ͞Seek, and you shall find͟ ʹ if you are truly searching for God, my friends ʹ you
will find Him, guaranteed, He isn͛t that hidden out of view.

ëo the newly established Christian man, woman, or child. If you have read this ʹ put it in a safe place,
and re-read it after you have learned a great deal about the Lord, its relevance will be far greater, later.
ëhe bible and scripture must be learned ʹ there is no easy way in or out of learning. ëhere honestly is no
͞God for Dummies͟ book out there which will empower you with a true understanding. ëhe walk I have
taken, is and has been a long and tedious one ʹ with many obstacles, and frightening experiences ʹ to
be where I am today ʹ and I still learn new things daily. If you try and skip the walk, you will miss the
mark, completely. ëhere is no way that money can buy you into the vast knowledge which has to be
͞tapped͟ into spiritually ʹ there is also no way to speed-read into the scriptures. ëhe bible has many
practical applications, and it is a manual of sorts ʹ but it͛s not something which should be absorbed
lineally if you hope to understand Him the way both He wishes, and the way you truly need.

God Bless you all