0 penilaian0% menganggap dokumen ini bermanfaat (0 suara)
5 tayangan3 halaman
The book, a doctor in the house, should be better regarded as A Liar In The House. Sanitising history is something else and blaming others in the process is pressing it even further. It cannot be denied that Dr M's time as PM was (and still is) the most corrupt period in the country's history.
The book, a doctor in the house, should be better regarded as A Liar In The House. Sanitising history is something else and blaming others in the process is pressing it even further. It cannot be denied that Dr M's time as PM was (and still is) the most corrupt period in the country's history.
Hak Cipta:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Format Tersedia
Unduh sebagai TXT, PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd
The book, a doctor in the house, should be better regarded as A Liar In The House. Sanitising history is something else and blaming others in the process is pressing it even further. It cannot be denied that Dr M's time as PM was (and still is) the most corrupt period in the country's history.
Hak Cipta:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Format Tersedia
Unduh sebagai TXT, PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd
The book, A Doctor In The House, should be better regarded as
A Liar In The House. Dr M, like a lot of other politicians is
clearly keen to rewrite history, and rewrite it in a manner most suitable for sanitising his 22-year reign as leader. Many people would rather leave Dr M alone since he is an old man despite his many past mistakes and bad actions and unfair treatment of people. Civilised humans much prefer to let any bygones be bygones and leave an elderly human being to enjoy a peaceful retirement. But sanitising history is something else. And blaming others in the process is pressing it even further. It cannot be denied that Dr M's time as PM was (and still is) the most corrupt period in the country's history. The PM's cronies and henchmen benefitted the most under his watch and they all got fat and rich until the 1997-8 financial crisis struck. There were UMNO politicians who went around with bulging suitcases full of cash and some, especially from the very dirty state of Sabah, always spending a lot of time travelling abroad and bedding plenty of ladies in the process. When his deputy fell out with him after the financial crisis, it was revealed that several of Dr M's cronies had brought in foreign women into the country using their VIP authority. Dr M was also responsible for the country losing a very huge sum of money when he unwisely tried to corner the tin market trading on the London metal exchange in the 1980s. The gnomes controlling the tin trading unleashed their reserve stocks and caused Dr M to lose his bet and the country was bloodied in the nose. It was one of many reasons why Dr M decided to pursue the Look East policy during his time as PM. As PM and the top politician (or top dog) in a sea of ambitious politicians, he was naturally always on the lookout for various kinds of scapegoats. Despite his very heavy workload, many were fated to fall victim to his very capable political machinations. Those who were foolish or brazen enough to either oppose him, or disagree with him, soon found out the hard way that not nodding your head in front of the boss was a painful mistake. Each time Dr M decided on something, everyone had to agree and provide the necessary praises. Should he suspect that you were reluctant to go along with him, your career or the good things in life would all too soon come to an end. Dr M was not above being petty as the top politician. When he found out that his deputy was not really fond of the national car project and the Penang bridge, he made certain that his deputy was the first man to drive the national car across the bridge when it was opened after being completed. Reports that the South orean contractor for the bridge rushed the project and resorted to using questionable shortcuts were suppressed. Under Dr M, many religious or racial supremacy groups reared their heads and Dr M was suspected of having encouraged at least some of them. Unlike his predecessors, he was not hesitant to take advantage of the sentiments brought up by these groups to strengthen and consolidate his position within his party and to tighten his control over the administration of the country. Dr M's favourite target was the Chinese community in the country and vernacular schools were looked upon as if they were leper institutions. People like Dr M were always fond of overlooking the fact that vernacular education critically provided jobs that helped many minority people to survive and they also helped to contribute a vital part to the country's development. Today, there are still many Dr M cronies who like to attack the vernacular education in the country despite the indisputable fact that it is popular even among non-chinese communities. The vernacular system suffered a lot under Dr M but still showed enough resilience to enable its society to be largely independent of the authorities and avoid adopting the welfare mentality. The welfare mentality favoured by Dr M's party is a great burden to the country even today. Under Dr M, the country adopted a lot of anti-minority measures supposedly to help the majority in the country and some are still kept standing in place today. These measures are patently unfair and unethical and could be regarded as illegal under other laws. However, few dare speak out against such unfair treatment as the law enforcers are always too ready to pounce at any given moment. Dr M's general treatment of Singapore can be easily likened to a neighbourhood bully pressing his weight against a small fella in his area. Singapore was ejected mainly because L did not want its population to dilute the majority's size and, potentially its political power, in the country. Not because of other reasons put forward by Dr M. His relationship with L Y can be likened to the situation where two tigers find themselves residing on the same mountain. Dr M is no saint compared to L Y. The two men can be described as S E Asia's Mao versus Chiang. Or Eisenhower versus MacArthur. Mao forced the PRC to stand up on its feet while Chiang never failed to tire in his efforts to avenge his failure. MacArthur was one who could never hesitate to compromise on his principles if he ever sensed his goals were about to come within reach while Eisenhower was a man of steely character. All four (or six) men were great leaders but they were cast from very vastly different molds. Dr M's time as PM also saw the start of the huge influx of labour from outside which has greatly worsened now. He was the first man to claim that the country was capable of supporting a population of sixty million (to seventy million). Due to his stand, politicians in the country encouraged the flow of illegal immigrants into their constituencies to provide or boost their much needed power base. This helped to spur lots of corrupt practices which have continued till today. Even as recently as a few months back, Immigration officials were found to be in the 'thick of the action'(corrupt practices). Nowadays, foreign immigrants fill up or control some sectors of the economy, especially the vegetable farms and the street markets, yet minority citizens, born and brought up here are still referred to by given euphemisms such as squatters or outsiders. It is therefore not surprising why the 'pihak luar/lain', the 'pendatang', and even the native communities are shrinking so fast these days. Since his time, the mass media has been given much free licence to air or regurgitate malicious claims or accusations made against the minority (politicians) by powerful groups in the country, and this practice has been allowed to carry on to the present day. In this respect, the country very easily ranks alongside some of the worst of Third World nations. Be in the know. (In truth, other countries like the US, tread more or less on the very same path, too. The current Homeland 'hearings' is one example.) Many legacies have been left behind by Dr M, quite several of them being bad or really bad ones. So, (reading) the book should be taken with a pinch of salt. Not that Dr M did not do anything good at all for the country. He should be regarded as a leader who was of a very strong mind and a man of vision. Just that for him, like other people such as MacArthur, the means were of lesser substance when compared to the desired objectives. Dr M still continues to keep a finger on the pulse of the nation perhaps to ensure that his vision for the country is still alive and that the present leaders do not forget him in a hurry. However, young people would prefer not to pay him too much attention. Today, many young people have left the country permanently for a better future abroad, while others who remained here are heavily involved in dealing with drugs, vice, piracy, counterfeiting, and other illegal activites. Employers prefer to hire foreigners, and most government jobs are closed to minority people. The vision is stil there, but like the book, never believe too much in it.