Group Members____________________________
Date ________________________
STAGE 2
These are assessor’s questions.
What is evidence of in-depth understanding, as opposed to superficial or naïve understanding?
Where should we look, and what should we look for to determine the extent of student learning?
What kinds of assessment evidence will anchor our curricular units and thus guide our
instruction.
Evidence of Understanding
When planning to collect evidence of understanding, consider a range of assessment methods.
• This includes such checks for understanding as
o oral questions, observations, dialogues, student logs, self-assessments, and peer
assessments
o traditional quizzes, test, and open-ended prompts
o performance tasks and projects.
• They vary in
o scope
from simple to complex
o time frame
from short-term to long-term
o setting
from decontextualized to authentic contexts
o structure
from highly to ill-structured.
Types of Assessment
Quiz and Test Items
• Consists of simple, content focused questions that…
o Assess for factual information, concepts, and discrete skills
o Use selected-response or short-answer formats
o Are convergent—typically have a single, best answer
o May easily be scored using an answer key or machine scoring
o Are secure or not know in advance
Academic Prompts
• Open-ended questions or problems that require students to think critically and to prepare
a response, product or performance
o Are open, with no single best answer or solution
o Are often ill-structured, requiring the development of a strategy
o Involve analysis, synthesis, evaluation, or a combination of these
o Require an explanation or defense of an answer and methods used
o Require judgment-based scoring, using criteria and performance standards
o May or may not be secure
Performance Tasks and Projects
• Involves complex challenges that mirror the issues and problems adults face
• Challenges are authentic
o Range in length from short-term to long-term
o Require tangible product or performance
o Use real or simulated settings with the kinds of constraints, background noise,
incentives, and opportunities an adult would find in a similar situation
o Require students to address an identified audience
o Are based on a specific purpose that relates to the audience
o Allow students greater opportunity to personalize the task
o Are not secure
o The task, criteria, and standards are known in advance and guide student work
Task 1
Write the targeted understanding and core performance task in the middle box—what students
should understand and be able to do. Then, brainstorm types of evidence that might be most
useful, insightful, and fair for rounding out the picture to produce sufficient evidence or
understanding.
Formal observations or interviews of Public performances
students
Targeted
Written, oral, or visual Understandings Student self‐assessments,
(displayed) products in Logs, and peer reviews
response to prompts
Core Performance Task
Student exhibits or Short‐answer quizzes
models And tests