Could someone in this forum clearly explain me the significant differences betwe
en Acceleration & Recovery Schedules, Whether it will create a room to Claim add
itional money from Client due to loss of time.
Guest.Top Printer-friendly versionLogin or register to post commentsSend to frie
nd..
Replies
Mon, 2004-07-12 06:41 #1 .Stuart Ness
Offline
Joined: 2004-06-30
Content Credits: 352
Groups: None Guys,
I can t agree with you that the title of a Schedule represents the party responsib
le for the delay caused.
I have seen Acceleration Schedules imposed on Contractors by the Client/Employer
simply because the Contractor himself was delayed by his own failures and unabl
e to schedule the project properly.
I have also seen (and been involved in) Recovery Schedules put forward by Contra
ctors when they have suffered from delays caused by the Client/Employer and wher
e they do not want to delay the schedule and get hit (unfairly) for LD s. Such a R
ecovery Schedule represents Constructive Acceleration.
I was involved in a project in Brazil last year, where the Contractor prepared a
"Hush Plan". It wasn t until a couple of weeks after my arrival in Brazil that I
discovered that a number of Brazilians cannot pronounce the letter "R" and inste
ad use the letter "H". Consequently, what I thought had been a very confidental
schedule, was in fact a "Rush Plan" for recovery of the project. ;-)
To reply to the original question, I don t think that it matters as to what you ca
ll the Schedule, the main criteria for claiming extra time and money is down to
your entitlement under the Contract and having an excusable delay.
Cheers,
Stuart
www.rosmartin.com .Top Login or register to post comments..Mon, 2004-07-12 10:33
#2 .Forum Guest
Offline
Joined: 2009-01-28
Content Credits: 4
Groups: Heavy Civils The topic is quiet interesting really, What i feel, Accelea
rtion means, to complete the job at any cost in time to meet the dateline. The q
uestion arises here is Who caused the delay? If the delay is caused by Client, C
ontractor will submit EOT Schedule, to avoid this kind of thing, the Client only
can request the Contractor to accelerate the job. so i feel Acceleration Schedu
le is usually prepared at the request of clients, but i ve no idea whether they wi
ll pay any extra money to the contractor!! in order to accelerate the job(anyhow
it depends on the mutual agreement as per the project contract).
Also i feel Recovery Schedule is to recover from the loss of time. Again the que
stion arises, who caused the loss of time? this time by the Contractor. so clien
t will request contractor to prepare recovery schedule, therefore the contractor
has to bring more resources(of-course based on the remaining bugetted man-hrs)t
o complete the job in time. Of course, I feel we can t claim anymoney in the recov
ery schedule due to contracor s delay.
So i feel both the terms are used against the contractors by the client. Client
only can say the contractor to Accelerate the job, Hence Acceleartion schedule i
s prepared due to Client s request(I feel most of the time this kind of schedule i
s prepared due to client s delay) and If the Contractor delays the job, Client wil
l instruct the contractor to recover the loss of time, hence Contractor has to p
repare and submit the recovery schedule.
Any more suggestions?............
Regards
Daya .Top Login or register to post comments..Tue, 2004-07-06 10:10 #3 .Martin C
orkill
Offline
Joined: 2003-07-04
Content Credits: 19
Groups: Building Services / E&M Yeah, I agree with Steven. Acceleration programm
e is for when the client has caused a delay which the contractor is trying to re
cover for them, a recovery programme is when the contractor has caused the delay
itself and is trying to recover. Acceleration will give cause for a financial c
laim, recovery won t. .Top Login or register to post comments..Tue, 2004-07-06 03:
47 #4 .Steven Oliver
Offline
Joined: 2002-11-08
Content Credits: 313
Groups: Railway Construction The very broad distinction, I would make is that
Acceleration schedule is at client cost to finish the project earlier, whilst a
recovery schedule is at contractor cost to recover lost time.
Very broad and very dependant on the project and contract terms. HTH .Top Login
or register to post comments..Sun, 2004-07-04 09:41 #5 .Forum Guest
Offline
Joined: 2009-01-28
Content Credits: 4
Groups: Heavy Civils Just a question on that last comment "Time is inversely pro
portional with cost."
IMHO I am not sure if it is entirely true in today s context !!
However it does open a room for inputs on this point from our learned forum memb
ers !
Any comments ? .Top Login or register to post comments..Sat, 2004-07-03 04:56 #6
.Ernesto Montales
Offline
Joined: 2002-03-23
Content Credits: 57
Groups: Building Works, Oracle, Pinoy Planning Planet Community Acceleration Sch
edule and or Recovery Schedule is somewhat related in context. When you say acce
leration schedule you are in the process of completing the project earlier than
the baseline by making , this could apply whether the project is delayed or not.
For Recovery schedule the basic meaning itself suggest that we need to get back
on track in relation with the baseline schedule, or in can be called accelerate
d schedule also cause you have to work on a shorter time period that the orginal
to get back on track.
Whether recovery or accelarated schedule, there is always additional resources (
money, materials,men & machines) involve for the program to take effect, cause T
ime is inversely proportional with cost.
Regards
E. Montales
__________